Presatovir (GS-5806) for Treatment of Respiratory...
-
Upload
duonghuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Presatovir (GS-5806) for Treatment of Respiratory...
IWCPAT 2017, Chicago
Presatovir (GS-5806) for Treatment of
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection
Polina German, Pharm.D.
Clinical Pharmacology, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA
Disclosures
I am an employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2
Significant Unmet Medical Need of RSV Infection
RSV is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among children <5 years old
– Worldwide: ~3.4 million hospitalizations with up to 200,000 deaths1
– US: ~60,000 hospitalizations among <24 month old infants2
• ~2 million annual outpatient and emergency visits
• Among <1 year olds: 9-fold more respiratory deaths than influenza
RSV infections also affect adults
– Elderly with underlying cardiopulmonary disease (prevalence 5–8%)
• Among >50 year olds: ~10,000 deaths each year3
– Immunocompromised: hematopoietic cell and lung transplant patients (prevalence 2–17%)
• ~25% of upper tract infections progress to lower tract4
• Mortality rate among lower tract infected is ~30%5
No effective treatment for RSV infection is available
RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
1. Nair et al. Lancet. 2010;375:1545-55. 2. Hall et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:588-98. 3. Thompson et al. JAMA. 2003;289:179-86. 4. Kim et al. J Infect Dis.
2014;209:1195-204. 5. Seo et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19:589-96.3
RSV Development Challenges
No formal guidance available for development of agents to treat or prevent RSV
Establishing definition for RSV disease severity
– Lack of widely-accepted definition
Defining appropriate patient population
– Underlying patient factors, age and/or disease severity
Clinical endpoints
– Clinical outcome versus virologic endpoints
– Need to avoid endpoints that are influenced by health care system (eg, duration of
hospitalization)
• “MALRI”: medically attended lower respiratory illness endpoint (eg, physician visits, urgent care and
emergency visits, and hospitalization)
Agents in Development for RSV Treatment
5
RSV
VIRAL PARTICLE
(–) GENOME(+) ANTIGENOME
CYTOPLASM
Transcription
Protein synthesis
Entry via fusion
Assembly
HOST CELL
NUCLEUS
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
RNA replication
Fusion inhibitors
Presatovir, VP-14637,
JNJ-2408068, ALX-0171
RSV Polymerase
Inhibitors
ALS-8176, T-705
(influenza polymerase)
Presatovir Preclinical Characteristics
Allosteric inhibitor of F protein
– Blocks viral entry by inhibiting fusion of the viral envelope with the host cell membrane
In vitro antiviral effect
– Mean EC50 0.4 nM for 75 clinical RSV (types A and B) isolates
In vivo efficacy in a cotton rat model
Concentrates in the lung in Sprague-Dawley rats
– Lung tissue /plasma AUC ratio ~26, ELF/plasma AUC ratio ~9.4 in animal models
Favorable safety profile in toxicology studies
AUC, area under concentration-time curve; EC50, half-maximal concentration; ELF, epithelial lining fluid.6
7
Presatovir Preclinical Characteristics
Limited potential for clinically significant DDIs
Rates of presatovir metabolism by CYPs 1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9 and 2C19 below limit of
quantification
No appreciable Phase II metabolism (eg UGT1A1)
Presatovir is not expected to be an inhibitor of CYP450- or UGT1A1 or an inducer via PXR
or AhR-mediated pathways
AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; BCRP, breast cancer resistance protein; CYP, cytochrome p450; DDI, drug-drug interaction; MATE, multidrug and toxic
compound extrusion protein; OATP, organic anion-transporting polypeptide; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; PXR, pregnane X receptor; UGT, uridine 5’-diphospho-
glucuronosyltransferase.
Transporters / Enzymes Substrate Inhibitor
P-gp/BCRP and OATP1B1/3
MATE1/MATE 2-K —
CYP3A —
(weak)
(weak)
Clinical Program Overview
7 Phase 1 studies in healthy subjects
– SAD, MAD, mass balance, food effect, ethnic bridging, QT, ECHO, DDI studies
with inhibitors/inducers
Phase 2a challenge study in healthy subjects infected with RSV
4 Phase 2b efficacy and safety studies in adults with RSV
– Hospitalized adults with RSV
– HCT recipients with upper respiratory tract infection
– HCT recipients with lower respiratory tract infection
– Lung transplant recipients with RSV infection
ECHO, environmental influences on child health outcomes; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation; MAD, multiple ascending dose.8
Presatovir PK Data in Healthy Adults
Dose-proportional exposure increases across 25 mg to 800 mg
Low variability in PK (CV% 30–40%)
t1/2 ~33–35 hours%CV, % coefficient of variation; plasma-binding-adjusted effective concentration required for 95% inhibition.
Jin et al. ICAAC. September 2-6, 2014, Washington DC, USA.
Presatovir Single Oral Dose
0 1 2 2 4 3 6 4 8 6 0 7 2
1 0
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
Mean P
resato
vir
Co
ncen
tration
, ng
/mL (
±S
D)
25 mg
75 mg
150 mg
500 mg
300 mg
800 mg
Time, h
paEC95 for M37b strain
9
In vivo DDI Potential
– Presatovir may be administered with inhibitors of P-gp/BCRP, OATP1B1/1B3 or
CYP3A
– Moderate/strong CYP3A inducers should not be administered with presatovir
Presatovir may be administered without regard to food1
Lack of effect of race on the PK of presatovir1
10
Clinical Pharmacology
GLSM, geometric least-squares mean.
1. Xin et al. IDWeek 2015, abstr 765.
Object Perpetrator AUC Cmax
Presatovir
Cyclosporine OATP/P-gp/BCRP inhibitor ↑26% ↑11%
Cobicistat CYP3A inhibitor ↑122% ↑13%
Rifampin Strong CYP3A/P-gp inducer 80% 40%
Efavirenz Moderate CYP3A/P-gp inducer 56% 12%
90% CIs of the GLSM ratios extended above (↑) or below (↓) the predetermined equivalence boundaries of 70 to 143%.
Challenge Study in Adults: Treatment Model
The 5d 50/25 mg regimen targeted Cmin ~4x paEC95
Doses and regimens for Cohorts 5–7 (adaptive regimens) informed by interim efficacy/safety
analyses of Cohorts 1–4 (prespecified regimen)
*Included in safety but not efficacy analysis.11
Pretreatment Period Treatment Period
Day −2 2–50 12
CohortPresatovir, mg/d or placebo
1:1
4:1
4:1
4:1
50 25 25 25 251–45d 50/25 mg
53d 50/25 mg
6SD 100 mg
75d 10/5 mg
Admit to
quarantine
RSV
inoculation
Randomization
RSV+ Day 2–5
RSV− Day 5*
50 25 25
100
10 5 5 5 5
0
Discharge
Results: Reduction in Viral Load and Symptoms
DeVincenzo et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:711-22. 12
Reduced Viral Load
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Post-Treatment, d
Me
an
(S
E)
Vira
l L
oa
d, lo
g1
0P
FU
e/m
L
Treatment start
(2–5 d after RSV
inoculation)
p <0.001 Reduced Respiratory Symptoms
-3
-2
-1
2
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
0
1
p=0.005
Me
an
Cha
ng
e (
SE
) F
rom
Ba
selin
e
Post-Treatment, d
Placebo
Presatovir
Reduced Nasal Mucus Production
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
p=0.03
Me
an
(S
E)
Da
ily T
ota
l, g
Post-Treatment, d
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0
Post-Treatment, days
Mean V
L, lo
g10
PF
Ue
/mL (
SE
)
Treatment start
(2–5 days after RSV inoculation)
Presatovir 5d 50/25 mg (n=27)
Presatovir 3d 50/25 mg (n=13)
Presatovir SD 100 mg (n=10)
Presatovir 5d 10/5 mg (n=11)
Placebo (n=27)*
Placebo (n=36)†
Results: Viral Load With Shorter/Lower-Dose Regimens
*Cohorts 1–4; †Cohorts 5–7; p <0.05 for all arms vs placebo.
SE, standard error; VL, viral load.13
-3
-2
-1
0
2
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 00
Results: Similar Effects With Shorter/Lower-Dose Regimens
p <0.05 for all arms vs placebo, except GS-5806 5d 10/5 mg vs placebo for Mucus Weight (p=0.20).
Post-Treatment, days
Mucus Weight Total Symptom Diary Score
Me
an
Da
ily T
ota
l, g
(S
E)
Me
an
Ch
an
ge
(S
E)
Fro
m B
ase
line
Post-Treatment, days
Placebo (n=27)*
Placebo (n=36)†
5d 50/25 mg (n=27)
3d 50/25 mg (n=13)
SD 100 mg (n=10)
5d 10/5 mg (n=11)
Presatovir
14
Mechanistic Modeling
Characterization of the dynamics between viral load (VL), clinical symptom
score (CSS) and presatovir dose
Presatovir dosing simulations (N=100 subjects):
– 100 mg SD, 2 to 200 mg ascending QD dosing, 200 mg Q4D, and 200 mg LD
then 100 mg QD
– Dosing regimens modeled to initiate from 24 to 120 hours post-infection to
examine effect of time of drug initiation post-infection
Lutz J, et al. RSV Symposium 2016, 15
Presatovir Effect as a Function of Dose
Maximum VL and CSS suppression is predicted to occur at doses as low as 50 mg QD
Lutz J, et al. RSV Symposium 2016.16
2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0 1 4 4 1 6 8 1 9 2 2 1 6
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0 1 4 4 1 6 8 1 9 2 2 1 6
1
2
3
4
0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0
-1 0 0
-8 0
-6 0
-4 0
-2 0
0
0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0
-1 0 0
-8 0
-6 0
-4 0
-2 0
0
Placebo
2 mg qd
3 mg qd
6 mg qd
2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0 1 4 4 1 6 8 1 9 2 2 1 6
0 .0
0 .2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
1 .0
13 mg qd
25 mg qd
50 mg qd
100 mg qd
200 mg qd
Presatovir 24 h postinoculation
Presatovir Dose, mgPresatovir Dose, mg
Time, hTime, h
Lo
g10
VL
, P
FU
e/m
L
% D
ecre
ase
in
VL
AU
C0-2
16
CS
SF
ractio
na
l E
ffic
acy
Presatovir Effect as a Function of Time Post-Infection
Minimal VL and CSS suppression is predicted if presatovir is administered greater than 72 hrs post inoculation
Lutz J, et al. RSV Symposium 2016.17
2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0 1 4 4 1 6 8 1 9 2 2 1 6
0 .0
0 .2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
1 .0
2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0 1 4 4 1 6 8 1 9 2 2 1 6
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0 1 4 4 1 6 8 1 9 2 2 1 6
1
2
3
4
2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0
-1 0 0
-8 0
-6 0
-4 0
-2 0
0
2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0
-1 0 0
-8 0
-6 0
-4 0
-2 0
0
Placebo
24 h postinoculation
48 h postinoculation
72 h postinoculation
96 h postinoculation
120 h postinoculation
Presatovir 200/100 mg
Lo
g10
VL
, P
FU
e/m
L
% D
ecre
ase
in
VL
AU
C0-2
16
CS
S
Fra
ctio
na
l E
ffic
acy
Presatovir Initiation Time
Post-Inoculation, h
Presatovir Initiation Time
Post-Inoculation, h
Time, hTime, h
2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0 1 4 4 1 6 8 1 9 2 2 1 6
0 .0
0 .2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
1 .0
2 4 4 8 7 2 9 6 1 2 0 1 4 4 1 6 8 1 9 2 2 1 6
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
18
Mechanistic Modeling: Presatovir Efficacy Intermittent Dosing
Administration of two 200 mg doses, staggered by 4 days, is predicted to achieve maximal
viral suppression
Lutz J, et al. RSV Symposium 2016.
Fra
ctional E
ffic
acy
Lo
g10 V
L,
PF
Ue
/mL
Time, hTime, h
Placebo
Presatovir 200mg Q4D x2
24 h postinoculation
48 h postinoculation
72 h postinoculation
96 h postinoculation
120 h postinoculation
Phase 2b Hospitalized Adult Study
200 RSV+ hospitalized adults
Single-dose regimen
Primary endpoint: daily average change in VL (Day 5)
Secondary endpoints: symptoms, healthcare utilization
190 subjects enrolled (May 2017)
Presatovir 200-mg single dose
Day 1 5 2814
Viral load
Symptoms
n=100
Placebo single dosen=100
19
Phase 2b Bone Marrow Transplant Upper
and Lower Respiratory Tract Studies
Day 1 9 2822
Presatovir 200 mg q4d x5
Placebo q4d x5
Viral Load
Symptoms
56
Optional Extended Viral Follow-up
20
Upper Respiratory Tract Lower Respiratory Tract
RSV+ patients 200 outpatients 60 inpatients
Regimen Multidose Multidose
Primary endpoint Daily average change in VL (Day 9) Daily average change in VL (Day 9)
Secondary endpoints Progression, respiratory failure, mortality Respiratory failure, mortality
Subjects enrolled 188 (June 2017) 60 (May 2017)
Phase 2b Lung Transplant Study
60 RSV+ lung transplant patients
Primary endpoint: daily average change in VL (Day 7)
Secondary endpoints: lung function, symptoms
48-wk follow-up for development of BOS/graft failure after Day 28
61 subjects enrolled
BOS, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.
Day 1 7 2114
Presatovir 200 mg on Day 1; 100 mg/d on Days 2‒14
Placebo daily for 14 d
n=40
n=20
56
Optional extended viral follow-up
Symptoms Daily assessment
Spirometry
28
Viral load
21
Conclusions
Presatovir is a fusion inhibitor for treatment of RSV infection
Favorable clinical pharmacology profile (healthy volunteers)
Favorable safety profile (healthy adults and patients)
Potent antiviral effect that reduces clinical signs and symptoms of RSV
infection in challenge study
Currently being evaluated in 4 ongoing Phase 2b studies in both outpatient
and inpatient settings
22
Acknowledgments
We extend our thanks to the study participants and study team. This study was funded by
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
23