Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

download Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

of 117

Transcript of Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    1/117

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Michael K. Friedland (State Bar No. 157,217)[email protected] S. Razai (State Bar No. 246,922)[email protected] Y. Hsu (State Bar No. 285,853)[email protected]

    KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 Main Street, Fourteenth FloorIrvine, CA 92614Telephone: (949) 760-0404Facsimile: (949) 760-9502

    Attorneys for PlaintiffPREMIER SYSTEMS USA, INC. D/B/A OLLOCLIP

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

    PREMIER SYSTEMS USA, INC. d/b/aOLLOCLIP, a California corporation,

    Plaintiff,

    v.DHARMESH SHAH A.K.A. DAVID

    SHAH d/b/a SOURCE VISTA, an

    individual, and LIVINGSOCIAL,

    INC., a Delaware corporation,

    Defendants.

    )))))

    )))))))))))))

    Civil Action No.

    COMPLAINT FOR PATENTINFRINGEMENT, TRADEDRESS INFRINGEMENT,

    FALSE DESIGNATION OFORIGIN, AND UNFAIRCOMPETITION

    DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    '13CV2281 NLAJB

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 1 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    2/117

    - 1 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Premier Systems USA, Inc. d/b/a Olloclip (Olloclip) hereby complains

    of Defendants Dharmesh Shah a.k.a. David Shah d/b/a Source Vista (Source

    Vista) and LivingSocial, Inc. (LivingSocial) (collectively Defendants) and

    alleges as follows:

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    1. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the claimsin this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338 because Olloclips claims

    for patent infringement, trade dress infringement, false designation of origin,

    and unfair competition pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271 and 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)

    arise under the laws of the United States. This Court has supplemental

    jurisdiction over the claims that arise under state statutory and common law

    pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a) because the state law claims are so related to

    the federal claims that they form part of the same case or controversy and derive

    from a common nucleus of operative facts.

    2. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants becauseDefendants have a continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this

    judicial district, and by committing acts of patent infringement, trade dress

    infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition in this judicial

    district, including but not limited to selling infringing products directly to

    consumers and/or retailers in this district and selling into the stream of

    commerce knowing such products would be sold in California and this district,

    which acts form a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to

    Olloclips claims.

    3. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c)and 1400(a) and (b).

    THE PARTIES

    4. Plaintiff Olloclip is a corporation organized and existing under thelaws of the State of California, having its principal place of business at 16291

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 2 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    3/117

    - 2 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Gothard Street, Huntington Beach, California 92647.

    5. Olloclip is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, thatDefendant Dharmesh Shah a.k.a. David Shah does business as Source Vista

    (Source Vista) with a principal place of business at 5316 Ambergate Lane,

    Dallas, Texas 75287.

    6. Olloclip is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, thatSource Vista operates the website www.sourcevista.com.

    7. Olloclip is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, thatDefendant LivingSocial, Inc. (LivingSocial) is a corporation organized and

    existing under the law of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of

    business at 1445 New York Ave. NW, Suite 200, Washington, D.C. 20005.

    8. Olloclip is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, thatLivingSocial operates the website www.livingsocial.com.

    GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

    9. Olloclip designs and sells quick-connect lens attachments for smartphone cameras, specifically for various models of the Apple iPhone

    (Olloclip Lens).

    10. The Olloclip Lens offers the combination of a fisheye lens, a wide-angle lens, and a macro lens in one compact unit that is easily attachable and fits

    in a persons pocket.

    11. Olloclip was launched in 2011 and designs and manufactures theOlloclip Lens at its headquarters in Huntington Beach, California.

    12. As a result of its highly acclaimed, innovative lens design andtechnology, Olloclip has grown at an impressive pace and is now the best-

    selling smart phone camera lens attachment in the world.

    13. Olloclip diligently protects its intellectual property rights in its lenstechnology as well as its valuable patents and trademarks both in the U.S. and

    abroad.

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 3 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    4/117

    - 3 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    14. Olloclips innovative designs and technology in the Olloclip Lensare also protected by design and utility patents, including United States Design

    Patent No. D678,379 (the D379 Patent) and United States Patent No.

    8,279,544 (the 544 Patent).

    15. On March 19, 2013, the U.S.P.T.O duly and lawfully issued theD379 Patent, entitled LENS COMPONENT. Olloclip is the owner by

    assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D379 Patent. A true and correct

    copy of the D379 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

    16. On October 2, 2012, the U.S.P.T.O duly and lawfully issued the544 Patent, entitled SELECTIVELY ATTACHABLE AND REMOVABLE

    LENSES FOR COMMUNICATION DEVICES. Olloclip is the owner by

    assignment of all right, title, and interest in the 544 Patent. A true and correct

    copy of the 544 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.

    17. Olloclip provides the public with constructive notice of its patentrights pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 287.

    18. The Olloclip Lens bears a unique and distinctive trade dress in theoverall design of the product (Product Trade Dress). The Product Trade Dress

    as a whole does not affect the cost or quality of the Olloclip Lens or serve any

    functional purpose, and it is not the only option for the design of a clip-on lens.

    An example of the Product Trade Dress is depicted below.

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 4 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    5/117

    - 4 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    19. As a result of Olloclips widespread use and display of the ProductTrade Dress in association with its Olloclip lens, (a) the public has come to

    recognize and identify products bearing the Product Trade Dress as emanating

    from Olloclip, (b) the public recognizes that products bearing the Product Trade

    Dress constitute high quality products that conform to the specifications created

    by Olloclip, and that (c) the Product Trade Dress has established strong

    secondary meaning and extensive goodwill.

    20. Olloclip sells its Olloclip Lens in packaging that bears a unique anddistinctive trade dress consisting of the overall image of its packaging as formed

    by white and red lettering on black packaging and a circular transparent window

    on the front of the packaging through which the product is displayed

    (Packaging Trade Dress). The Packaging Trade Dress as a whole does not

    affect the cost or quality of the Olloclip Lens or serve any functional purpose,

    and it is not the only option for packaging a clip-on lens. An example of the

    Packaging Trade Dress is depicted below.

    21. As a result of Olloclips widespread use and display of thePackaging Trade Dress in association with its Olloclip lens, (a) the public has

    come to recognize and identify products bearing the Packaging Trade Dress as

    emanating from Olloclip, (b) the public recognizes that products bearing the

    Packaging Trade Dress constitute high quality products that conform to the

    specifications created by Olloclip, and (c) the Packaging Trade Dress has

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 5 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    6/117

    - 5 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    established strong secondary meaning and extensive goodwill.

    22. Defendants manufacture, use, sell, offer for sale and/or import intothe United States lens attachments for smart phone camera lenses under the

    brands Source Vista 3-Piece Lens KitandInner Eye iPhone Camera Lens Set or

    3 Macro (Accused Products) that infringe Olloclips intellectual property

    rights.

    23. On August 28, 2013, Olloclip sent Defendants a cease and desistletter requesting that Defendants cease the infringement of Olloclips 544

    Patent, D379 Patent, and the Packaging Trade Dress.

    24. Olloclip requested that Defendants cancel any pending sales of theAccused Products. Defendants never responded to this request.

    FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Patent Infringement)

    (35 U.S.C. 271)

    25. Olloclip repeats and realleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1through 24 of the Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

    26. This is a claim for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271.27. Defendants, through their agents, employees and servants, have,

    and continue to, knowingly, intentionally and willfully directly infringe, engage

    in acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the D379

    Patent by directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering for sale

    and/or importing products into the United States that are covered by the claim of

    the D379 Patent, including, for example, Defendants Accused Products.

    28. Defendants acts of infringement of the D379 Patent wereundertaken without permission or license from Olloclip. Defendants had actual

    and/or constructive knowledge of the D379 Patent, and their actions constitute

    willful and intentional infringement of the D379 Patent. Defendants infringed

    the D379 Patent with reckless disregard of Olloclips patent rights. Defendants

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 6 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    7/117

    - 6 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    knew, or it was so obvious that Defendants should have known, that their

    actions constituted infringement of the D379 Patent. Defendants acts of

    infringement of the D379 Patent were not consistent with the standards of

    commerce for their industry.

    29. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants infringement of theD379 Patent, Defendants have derived and received gains, profits, and

    advantages in an amount not presently known to Olloclip.

    30. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289, Olloclip is entitled to Defendantstotal profits from Defendants infringement of the D379 Patent.

    31. Defendants, through their agents, employees and servants, have,and continue to, knowingly, intentionally and willfully directly infringe, engage

    in acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the 544

    Patent by directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering for sale

    and/or importing products into the United States that are covered by at least

    Claim 1 of the 544 Patent, including, for example, Defendants Accused

    Products.

    32. Defendants acts of infringement of the 544 Patent wereundertaken without permission or license from Olloclip. Defendants had actual

    and/or constructive knowledge of the 544 Patent, and their actions constitute

    willful and intentional infringement of the 544 Patent. Defendants infringed

    the 544 Patent with reckless disregard of Olloclips patent rights. Defendants

    knew, or it was so obvious that Defendants should have known, that their

    actions constituted infringement of the 544 Patent. Defendants acts of

    infringement of the 544 Patent were not consistent with the standards of

    commerce for their industry.

    33. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants infringement of the544 Patent, Defendants have derived and received gains, profits, and

    advantages in an amount that is not presently known to Olloclip.

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 7 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    8/117

    - 7 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    34. Defendants will continue to directly and/or indirectly infringe the544 Patent to the great and irreparable injury of Olloclip, unless enjoined by

    this Court.

    35. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, Olloclip is entitled to damages forDefendants infringing acts and treble damages together with interest and costs

    as fixed by this Court.

    36. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285, Olloclip is entitled to reasonableattorneys fees for the necessity of bringing this claim.

    37. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants patentinfringement, Olloclip has suffered and continues to suffer great and irreparable

    injury, for which Olloclip has no adequate remedy at law.

    38. Defendants will continue to infringe Olloclips patents, unlessenjoined by this Court.

    SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Federal Trade Dress Infringement)

    (15 U.S.C. 1125(a))

    39. Olloclip repeats and realleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1through 38 of the Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

    40. This is a claim for trade dress infringement under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

    41. As a result of the widespread use and display of the PackagingTrade Dress, the trade dress has acquired secondary meaning to potential

    purchasers, in that potential purchasers have come to associate the packaging for

    the Olloclip lens bearing the overall design of the Packaging Trade Dress with

    Olloclip.

    42. Subsequent to Olloclips use and adoption of the Packaging TradeDress, Defendants have developed, advertised, and sold lens attachments for

    smart phone camera lenses in packaging that uses trade dress that is confusingly

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 8 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    9/117

    - 8 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    similar to the Packaging Trade Dress. For example, the packaging of

    Defendants Inner Eye iPhone Camera Lens Set or 3 Macro product has the

    overall packaging design of the Olloclip Trade Dress.

    43. As a result of the widespread use and display of the Product TradeDress, the trade dress has acquired secondary meaning to potential purchasers,

    in that potential purchasers have come to associate Olloclip lens bearing the

    overall design of the Product Trade Dress with Olloclip.

    44. Subsequent to Olloclips use and adoption of the Product TradeDress, Defendants have developed, advertised, and sold lens attachments for

    smart phone camera lenses that use trade dress that is confusingly similar to the

    Product Trade Dress. For example, DefendantsInner Eye iPhone Camera Lens

    Set or 3 Macro product has the overall design of the Product Trade Dress.

    45. Defendants use of these features in connection with its lensattachments for smart phone camera lenses is likely to cause confusion, or to

    cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of

    Defendants with Olloclip.

    46. Upon information and belief, Defendants acts of trade dressinfringement were undertaken willfully with full knowledge of the falsity of

    such designation of origin and false descriptions or representations, and with the

    express intent to cause confusion, and to mislead and deceive the purchasing

    public.

    47. Olloclip is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, thatDefendants have derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,

    gains, profits and advantages from Defendants trade dress infringement in an

    amount that is not presently known to Olloclip. By reason of Defendants

    actions, constituting trade dress infringement, Olloclip has been damaged and is

    entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

    / / /

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 9 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    10/117

    - 9 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    48. Due to Defendants actions, constituting trade dress infringement,Olloclip has suffered and continues to suffer great and irreparable injury, for

    which Olloclip has no adequate remedy at law.

    THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Federal Unfair Competition & False Designation of Origin)

    (15 U.S.C. 1125(a))

    49. Olloclip repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-48 ofthis Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

    50. This is a claim for unfair competition and false designation oforigin arising under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

    51. Defendants use of the Product Trade Dress and Packaging TradeDress without Olloclips consent constitutes a false designation of origin, false

    or misleading description of fact or false or misleading representation of fact,

    which is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the

    affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as

    to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods or commercial

    activities by another person in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

    52. Such conduct by Defendants is likely to confuse, mislead, anddeceive Defendants customers, purchasers, and members of the public as to the

    origin of the Packaging Trade Dress and/or the Product Trade Dress, or cause

    said persons to believe that Defendants and/or their products have been

    sponsored, approved, authorized, or licensed by Olloclip or are in some way

    affiliated or connected with Olloclip, all in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

    53. Upon information and belief, Defendants actions were undertakenwillfully with full knowledge of the falsity of such designation of origin and

    false descriptions or representations, and with the express intent to cause

    confusion, and to mislead and deceive the purchasing public.

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 10 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    11/117

    - 10 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    54. Defendants use of the Packaging Trade Dress and the ProductTrade Dress without Olloclips consent each constitutes unfair competition with

    Olloclip.

    55. Olloclip is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, thatDefendants have derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,

    gains, profits and advantages from Defendants false designation of origin, false

    or misleading description of fact or false or misleading representation of fact,

    and unfair competition in an amount that is not presently known to Olloclip. By

    reason of Defendants actions, constituting false designation of origin, false or

    misleading description of fact or false or misleading representation of fact, and

    unfair competition, Olloclip has been damaged and is entitled to monetary relief

    in an amount to be determined at trial.

    56. Due to Defendants actions, constituting false designation of origin,false or misleading description of fact or false or misleading representation of

    fact, and unfair competition, Olloclip has suffered and continues to suffer great

    and irreparable injury, for which Olloclip has no adequate remedy at law.

    FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (California Statutory and Common Law Unfair Competition)

    (Cal. Bus. & Prof. 17200, et seq.)

    57. Olloclip repeats and re-alleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1through 56 of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

    58. This is a claim for unfair competition, arising under CaliforniaBusiness & Professions Code 17200, et seq. and California common law.

    59. Defendants acts of trade dress infringement and false designationof origin complained of herein constitute unfair competition with Olloclip under

    the common law and statutory laws of the State of California, particularly

    California Business & Professions Code 17200, et seq.

    / / /

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 11 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    12/117

    - 11 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    60. Olloclip is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, thatDefendants have derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,

    gains, profits and advantages from Defendants unfair competition in an amount

    that is not presently known to Olloclip.

    61. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants wrongful acts asalleged in this Complaint, Olloclip has been damaged and is entitled to

    monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

    62. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants willful andmalicious actions, constituting unfair competition, Olloclip has suffered and

    continues to suffer great and irreparable injury, for which Olloclip has no

    adequate remedy at law and such irreparable injury will continue unless

    Defendants are enjoined by this Court.

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court award

    Olloclip the following relief:

    A. That Olloclips D379 Patent and 544 Patent each be deemed validand willfully infringed by Defendants under 35 U.S.C. 271;

    B. That Defendants and their agents, servants, employees,representatives, successors, and assigns, and all persons, firms, or corporations

    in active concert or participation with Defendants, be temporarily, preliminarily,

    and permanently enjoined and restrained from directly or indirectly infringing

    the D379 Patent or the 544 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271;

    C. That Defendants account for all gains, profits, and advantagesderived by Defendants infringement of the D379 Patent and the 544 Patent in

    violation of 35 U.S.C. 271, and that Defendants pay to Olloclip all damages

    suffered by Olloclip as a result of Defendants infringement pursuant to 35

    U.S.C. 284;

    / / /

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 12 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    13/117

    - 12 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    D. That Olloclip be awarded Defendants total profits from theinfringement of the D379 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289;

    E. An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damagesbecause of Defendants willful patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284;

    F. An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case warranting anaward to Olloclip of the attorneys fees and costs incurred by Olloclip in

    connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285;

    G. That Defendants and their agents, servants, employees,representatives, successors, and assigns, and all persons, firms, or corporations

    in active concert or participation with Defendants, be temporarily, preliminarily,

    and permanently enjoined and restrained from engaging in, and assisting or

    inducing, directly or indirectly, others to engage in the following activities:

    1. using the Product Trade Dress, the Packaging Trade Dress,or any other trade dress that is confusingly similar thereto;

    2. falsely designating the origin of Defendants goods;3. unfairly competing with Olloclip in any manner whatsoever;4. causing a likelihood of confusion or injuries to Olloclips

    business reputation;

    5. manufacturing, using, displaying, distributing, or selling anyproducts that use trade dress that is confusingly similar to the

    Product Trade Dress, or any other trade dress that is

    confusingly similar thereto; and

    6. manufacturing, using, displaying, distributing, or selling anyproducts in packaging that uses trade dress that is

    confusingly similar to the Packaging Trade Dress, or any

    other trade dress that is confusingly similar thereto.

    H. That Defendants be adjudged to have competed unfairly withOlloclip under the common law of the State of California;

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 13 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    14/117

    - 13 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    I. That Defendants be adjudged to have competed unfairly withOlloclip under California Business & Professional Code 17200, and that

    Defendants actions in so doing be adjudged willful and done knowingly;

    J. That an accounting be ordered to determine Defendants profitsresulting from their infringement, false designation of origin and unfair

    competition, and that Olloclip be awarded monetary relief in an amount to be

    fixed by the Court in its discretion as it finds just as an equitable remedy and as

    a remedy under 15 U.S.C. 1117 and Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200,

    including:

    1. all profits received by Defendants from sales and revenues ofany kind made as a result of its infringing actions, said

    amount to be trebled;

    2. all damages sustained by Olloclip as a result of Defendantsacts of infringement, unfair competition, and false

    designation of origin, and that such damages be trebled; and

    3. punitive damages stemming from Defendants willful,intentional, and malicious acts.

    K. That Olloclip have and recover the costs of this civil action,including reasonable attorneys fees;

    L. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs ofthis action against Defendants; and,

    / / /

    / / /

    / / /

    / / /

    / / /

    / / /

    / / /

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 14 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    15/117

    - 14 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    M. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just andproper.

    Respectfully submitted,

    KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

    Dated: September 23, 2013 By: s/ Ali S. RazaiMichael K. FriedlandAli S. RazaiSamantha Y. Hsu

    Attorneys for PlaintiffPREMIER SYSTEMS USA, INC. d/b/aOLLOCLIP

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 15 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    16/117

    - 15 -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Plaintiff PREMIER SYSTEMS USA, INC. d/b/a OLLOCLIP hereby

    demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

    Respectfully submitted,

    KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

    Dated:September 23, 2013 By: s/ Ali S. RazaiMichael K. FriedlandAli S. RazaiSamantha Y. Hsu

    Attorneys for PlaintiffPREMIER SYSTEMS USA, INC. d/b/aOLLOCLIP

    16268266

    092013

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 16 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    17/117

    Table of Exhibits

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    TABLE OF EXHIBITS

    Page #

    Exhibit 1 ...................................................................................................................................16

    Exhibit 2 ...................................................................................................................................58

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 17 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    18/117

    EXHIBIT 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 18 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    19/117

    USO0D678379S

    ( 1 2 ) United States Design Patent ( 1 0 ) P a t e n t N 0 . 2 US D 6 7 8 , 3 7 9 SO N e i l l e t a l . ( 4 5 ) Date o f P a t e n t : 4 * Mar. 1 9 , 2013

    (54) LENSCOMPONENT D387,787 S * 12/1997 Palmer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/1305,831,778 A * 11/ 1998 .. 359/829*

    ( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : P a t r i c k O N e i l l , H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , CA "U$);Ch0I1gPak,LakeWOOd,CA(U$) 6 , 8 8 9 , 0 0 6 B2 5 / 2 0 0 5 K o b a y a s h iD546,863 S * 7/2007 I t o e t a1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/219

    ( 7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : Premier Systems USA, I n c . , Huntington 1 3 5 6 0 3 0 2 5 * 1 / 2 0 0 8 T O k i W a e t a 1 ~ ~ D 1 6 / 2 0 8Beach CA Us ) 7,600,932 B2* 10/2009 Senba et a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396/529

    7,639,353 B2 12/2009 R o oke* * 7 , 9 6 7 , 5 1 3 B 2 6 / 2 0 1 1 Zhang( ) Term 14 Years 8 , 0 4 0 , 6 2 1 B 2 * 1 0 / 2 0 1 1 Chang 6 1 3 1 . . . . . 3 5 9 / 8 2 4

    D649,970 S * 12/2011 Lyfordetal. . .D14 / 4 33( 2 1 ) Appl.No.: 29/409,978 8 , 0 7 3 , 3 2 4 B 2 * 1 2 / 2 0 1 1 T s a i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 396/5448 , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B 1 1 0 / 2 0 1 2 O N e i l l

    - _ 2007/0275763 A1 1 1/2007 SaWadski t a1 .( 2 2 ) F l l e d ' Dec'3o 2011 2 0 0 7 / 0 2 8 0 6 7 7 A1 1 2 / 2 0 0 7 D r a k e e t a l .( 5 1 ) LOC 9 ) C l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6 - 0 6 g c h i g e f e r l 1

    _ r 1 n, r . eta.(52) U.S.Cl. . . . . . . . D 1 6 / 1 3 4,D 1 4 / 5 1 1 20l0/0048243 A1 200) Fourquin e t a l (58) Field o fClassi? cation Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/130, 2010/0328420 A1 12/2010 Roman

    D 1 6 / 1 3 4 , 1 3 6 , 2 1 9 , 2 5 0 ; 3 5 9 / 4 0 9 , 8 0 8 , 8 2 3 , 2 0 1 1 / 0 1 1 0 6 5 4 A 1 5 / 2 0 1 1 M a k i3 5 9 / 8 2 7 ' D14/432 43 3 24 2 23 9 48 3 5 1 1 FOREIGN PATENTDOCUMENTS

    D 1 4 / 2 1 7 , 4 8 4 ; 3 9 6 / 5 3 0 , 6S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r c o m p l e t e s e a r c h h i s t o r y . W0 WC 0 0 6 0 0 2 6 7 4 1 / 2 0 0 6( 5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d OTHER PUBLICATIONS

    U s } ; P A H / B E N T D O C I i I M E N T S / A m a Z o n . c o m : F i s h E y e l e n s + W i d e n g l e L e n s + M a c r o L e n s 3 - i n - lD141692 S 6 1945 Neme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16 136 - - - - Ktf PdPh 4G td Fb.3 2012.2,428,719 A * 1 0 / 1 9 4 7 Nemeth 359/823 1 o r O 1 one pnne on e 3,090,282 A * 5/1963 Angenieux . . 359/823 * . db .3 , 1 3 3 , 1 4 0 A * 5 / 1 9 6 4 W i n c h el l 3 5 9 / 5 1 1 o ne Yexamlner3,138,060 A * 6/1964 Eggert et a 1 . . 359/7023 , 4 5 4 , 3 2 3 A * 7 / 1 9 6 9 D i e r k s e t a l . . 3 5 9 / 6 1 2 Primary ExamineriPaula Greene3 , 6 2 0 , 1 4 9 A * 1 1 / 1 9 7 1 o g l h f l m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 9 6 / 5 3 3 ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , orFirmiKnob be, M a r t e n s , O l s o n&3 , 8 1 7 , 6 0 1 A * 6 / 1 9 7 4 C o l a 1 a c e e t a l . 359/700 Be ar LLP3,828,991 A * 8/1974 Moore . . . . . . . . . 224/610 D248,160 S * 6/1978 Feinblo om e t a 1 . . D 1 6 /2 3 74,264,167 A 4/1981 Plummer . . . . . . . . . . .. 396/17 (57) CLAIMD264,048 S * 4/ 1982 Magner . . . . . . . . D8/382 The ornamental design f o r a l e n s component, a s shoWn a ndD274,336 s * 6/1984 H u ck enb eck . . D 1 6 /1 3 2 describ edD274,691 S * 7/1984 Wallace . . . . . . . D8/336D275,766 S * 10 /1984 S uzuki . . . . D16/134D295,871 S * 5/ 1988 Charles . . . D16/130 DESCRIPTION4,760,510 A 7/1988 Lahti . . . . . . . 362/365 _ _ _ _4 , 8 9 3 , 1 4 3 A * 1 / 1 9 9 0 Sheng-Huei . 396/530 FIG. 1 1 s a f r o n t , t o p , a nd l e f t s 1 d e perspectlve V1eW of l e n s5 , 0 5 0 , 9 6 3 A * 9 / 1 9 9 1 3 5 9 / 8 0 8 Component;5 , 0 5 4 , 8 8 6 A * 1 0 / 1 9 9 1 0 2 3 1 6 6 1 6 1 . 3 5 9 / 8 2 3 FIG 2- f t 1 t - 1 - t h f .5 , 3 1 1 , 3 5 8 A * 5 / 1 9 9 4 P e d e r s o n e t a l . 3 5 9 / 5 1 0 F I G 3 1 mn 1 3 6 V ? I o n ? . l l e w t h e r e ? 5 , 4 1 6 , 5 4 4 A * 5 / 1 9 9 5 S t a p l e t o n 3 9 6 / 5 4 4 - lsarear 9% 0? V1eW_ e r e o 5 , 4 5 5 , 7 1 1 A 4 10/1995 Palmer u 359/353 FIG. 41s a l e f t s 1 d e e l e v a t 1 o n a l V1eW t h e r e o f ;

    S3 7 4 , 8 7 8 * 1 0 / 1 9 9 6 Palmer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/ 3 0 FIG. 5 i s a r i g h t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l View t h e r e o f ;

    Page 16Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 19 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    20/117

    US D 6 7 8 , 3 7 9 SP a g e 2

    F I G . 6 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 7 i s a bottom p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 8 i s a r e a r , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 9 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 0 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 1 i s a f r o n t , t o p , a n d l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e vieW o fa n o t h e r e m b o d i m e n t of l e n s component;F I G . 12 s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n al v i e W h e r e o f ;FIG. 13 s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W h e r e o f ;F I G . 14 s a l e f t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 5 i s a r i g h t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW t h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 6 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 7 i s a bottom l a n vieW h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 8 i s a r e a r , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 9 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 0 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 1 i s a f r o n t , t o p , a n d l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e vieW o fa n o t h e r e m b o d i m e n t of l e n s component;F I G . 2 2 s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W h e r e o f ;FIG. 23 s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 4 s a l e f t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W t h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 2 5 i s a r i g h t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 6 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 27 s a bottom l a n vieW h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 8 i s a r e a r , b o t t o m , and r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 9 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 0 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , and l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 1 i s a f r o n t , t o p , a n d l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e vieW o fa n o t h e r e m b o d i m e n t of l e n s component;F I G . 32 s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o na l v i e W h e r e o f ;FIG. 33 s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W h e r e o f ;F I G . 34 s a l e f t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 5 i s a r i g h t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 6 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 37 s a bottom l a n vieW h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 8 i s a r e a r , b o t t o m , and r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 9 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ; a n d ,F I G . 4 0 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , and l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f .The f e a t u r e s i l l u s t r a t e d in phantom i n e form n o p a r t o f t h ec l a i m e d d e s i g n .

    1 C l a i m , 4 0 Drawing S h e e t s

    Page 17Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 20 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    21/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 0 1 4 0 US 678,379 S

    F I G . ]

    Page 18Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 21 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    22/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 2 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    Page 19Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 22 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    23/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 3 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    F I G . 3

    Page 20Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 23 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    24/117

    Page 21Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 24 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    25/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 5 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    / / / , / / _F I G . 5

    Page 22Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 25 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    26/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 6 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    Page 23Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 26 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    27/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 7 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    Page 24Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 27 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    28/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 8 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    Page 25Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 28 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    29/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 9 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    Page 26Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 29 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    30/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 0 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    F I G . 1 0

    Page 27Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 30 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    31/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 1 0 1 4 0 US 678,379 S

    F I G . 1 ]

    Page 28Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 31 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    32/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 2 0 1 4 0 US 678,379 S

    Page 29Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 32 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    33/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 3 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    F I G . 1 3

    Page 30Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 33 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    34/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 4 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    F I G . 1 4

    Page 31Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 34 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    35/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 5 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    F I G . 1 5

    Page 32Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 35 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    36/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 6 0 1 4 0 US 678,379 S

    F I G . [ 6

    Page 33Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 36 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    37/117

    Page 34Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 37 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    38/117

    US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 8 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

    F I G . 1 8

    Page 35Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 38 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    39/117

    Page 36Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 39 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    40/117

    Page 37Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 40 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    41/117

    Page 38Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 41 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    42/117

    Page 39Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 42 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    43/117

    Page 40Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 43 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    44/117

    Page 41Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 44 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    45/117

    Page 42Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 45 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    46/117

    Page 43Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 46 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    47/117

    Page 44Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 47 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    48/117

    Page 45Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 48 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    49/117

    Page 46Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 49 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    50/117

    Page 47Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 50 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    51/117

    Page 48Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 51 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    52/117

    Page 49Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 52 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    53/117

    Page 50Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 53 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    54/117

    Page 51Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 54 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    55/117

    Page 52Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 55 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    56/117

    Page 53Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 56 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    57/117

    Page 54Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 57 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    58/117

    Page 55Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 58 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    59/117

    Page 56Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 59 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    60/117

    Page 57Exhibit 1

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 60 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    61/117

    EXHIBIT 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 61 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    62/117

    US008279544B1

    ( 1 2 ) United States Patent ( 1 0 ) P a t e n t N 0 . : U S 8 , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1O N e i l l ( 4 5 ) Date o f P a t e n t : O c t . 2 , 2012

    (54) SELECTIVELYATTACHABLEAND 2007/0275763 A1* 11/2007 SaWadski e t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455/5662007/0280677 A1 1 2 / 2 0 0 7 Drake e t a 1 .REMOVABLE LENSESFOR 2 0 0 9 / 0 1 0 9 5 5 8 A1 4 / 2 0 0 9 S c h a e f e r

    COMMUNICATIONDEVICES 2009/0181727 A1 7 / 2 0 0 9 G r i f ? n , J r . e t a 1 .2 0 1 0 / 0 0 4 8 2 4 3 A1 2/2010 Fourquin e t a 1. . . . . . . . . . .. 455/556.1

    ( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r : P a t r i c k D N e i l l , H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , 2 0 1 0 / 0 3 2 8 4 2 0 A1 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 RomanCA Us ) 2 0 1 1 / 0 1 1 0 6 5 4 A1 5 / 2 0 1 1 Maki_ _ _ FOREIGNPATENTDOCUMENTS( 7 3 ) A s s l g n e e . P r e m i e r S y s t e m s USA, I n c , H u n t 1 n g t o n J P 2 0 0 6 _ 2 5 l 1 5 0 9 / 2 0 0 6

    B e a c h CA U s ) J P 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 6 1 3 7 8 / 2 0 0 7W0 WO 006/002674 l / 2 0 0 6( * ) N o t i c e : S u b j e c t t o a n y d i s c l a i m e r , t h e t e r m o f h i sp a t e n t i s e x t e n d e d o r a d j u s t e d u n d e r 3 5 OTHERPUBLICATIONS

    U - S - C - 1 5 4 0 3 ) by 0 d a y s - Amazoncom: F i s h Eye e n s + Wide n g l e L e n s + Macro L e n s 3 - i n - 1K i t f o r i P o d i P h o n e 4 G , D e c . 2 6 , 2 0 1 1 .

    (21) Appl. No.: 13/366,227 _ _* c i t e d by examlner(22) F i l e d : Feb. 3 , 2012 _ _Prtmary Exammer*ohammed Hasan

    Related U _ s _ Application Data ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , o r Firm * nobbe Martens Olson &Bear LLP( 6 0 ) P r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 6 1 / 4 5 4 , 1 3 6 , ? l e d on M a r .1 8 , 2 0 1 1 , p r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 6 1 / 5 0 3 , 8 3 5 , ( 5 7 ) ABSTRACT

    ?led on J u l . 1 , 2011, provisional application No . - - -6 1 / 5 8 5 85 7 ? l d J 1 2 2012 So me embodlments d i s c l o s e d h e r e i n r e l a t e t o a l e n s compo e on an ' nent having one or more lenses attached to a retainer portion

    5 1 I t Cl con?gured t o removably a t t a c h t o communication d e v i c e s( ) n such a s mobile p h o n e s , t a b l e t c o m p u t e r s , media p l a y e r s , andG02B 7 / 0 2 (200601) t h e l i k e . The r e t a i n e r p o r t i o n m a y be con?gured s o a s n o t t o( 5 2 ) US. l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359/827; 359/819 i n t e r f e r e With u s e r s VieW Of d i s p l a y panel Ofthe Commu( 5 8 ) F i e l d o f Classi?cation Search . . . . . . . . . . . 359/81 14827 n i c a t i o n d e v i c e . I n some embodiments, a p l u r a l i t y of l e n s e sS e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r c o m p l e t e s e a r c h h i s t o r y . m ay b e p r o v i d e d , a n d t h e l e n s e s may b e r e m o v a b l y a t t a c h e dt o t h e r e t a i n e r p o r t i o n a n d m ay b e i n t e r c h a n g e a b l e . A t r u c( 5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d t u r e f o r p r o v i d i n g a ?ash m ay a l s o be p r o v i d e d . I n some

    U S . PATENT DOCUMENTS6 , 8 8 9 , 0 0 6 B2 5 / 2 0 0 5 K o b a y a s h i7,6 3 9,3 53 B2* 12/2009 Rooke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 356/23927 , 9 6 7 , 5 1 3 B2 6 / 2 0 1 1 Z h a n g

    A) ?

    e m b o d i m e n t s , a d d i t i o n a l f e a t u r e s may b e p r o v i d e d , s u c h a sa t t a c h m e n t components t o f a c i l i t a t e a t t a c h m e n t t o s t a b i l i t yd e v i c e s , s u c h a s t r i p o d s , and o u s e r - W e a r a b l e a c c e s s o r i e s .

    2 0 C l a i m s , 4 4 Drawing S h e e t s

    Page 58Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 62 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    63/117

    US. Patent O c t . 2 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 0 1 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    F I G .C

    / / 6Z 5 / / Z /F I G .B

    Page 59Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 63 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    64/117

    US. Patent O c t . 2 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 2 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    Page 60Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 64 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    65/117

    S h e e t 3 0 f 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1S. Patent 0 a . 2 , 2 0 1 2

    Page 61Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 65 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    66/117

    US. Patent O c t . 2 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 4 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    //0

    5Qi f )

    Page 62Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 66 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    67/117

    US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 5 0 f 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    A5070

    F I G . 2B

    Page 63Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 67 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    68/117

    US 8 , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1c t .S. P a t e n t

    F I G . 3 A

    Page 64Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 68 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    69/117

    US 8 , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1S. P a t e n t

    F I G . 3 B

    Page 65Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 69 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    70/117

    US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 8 0 f 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    F I G . 4 A

    Page 66Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 70 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    71/117

    US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 9 0 f 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    F I G . 4 B

    Page 67Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 71 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    72/117

    US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 0 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    F I G . 5 A

    Page 68Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 72 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    73/117

    US. Patent O c t . 2 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 1 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    \' 1

    [$ 1 Q I )Q

    a J205

    F I G . 5 B

    Page 69Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 73 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    74/117

    US. Patent O c t . 2 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 2 0 1 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    F I G . 6 A

    Page 70Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 74 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    75/117

    US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 3 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    Page 71Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 75 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    76/117

    US. Patent O c t . 2 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 4 0 f 4 4

    Page 72Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 76 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    77/117

    US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 5 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    B RE

    \ % \

    Q MR

    Page 73Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 77 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    78/117

    US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 6 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    I/[ F I G .H

    F I G .C

    Page 74Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 78 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    79/117

    Page 75Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 79 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    80/117

    US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 s o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    F I G .F

    4 0 4 m y4 0 2 F I G .E

    / 2 9 w%

    F I G .1 )

    4 0 4

    Page 76Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 80 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    81/117

    US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 9 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

    F I G .]

    j i J F I G9 H

    F I G .C

    Page 77Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 81 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    82/117

    Page 78Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 82 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    83/117

    Page 79Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 83 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    84/117

    Page 80Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 84 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    85/117

    Page 81Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 85 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    86/117

    Page 82Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 86 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    87/117

    Page 83Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 87 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    88/117

    Page 84Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 88 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    89/117

    Page 85Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 89 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    90/117

    Page 86Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 90 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    91/117

    Page 87Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 91 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    92/117

    Page 88Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 92 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    93/117

    Page 89Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 93 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    94/117

    Page 90Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 94 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    95/117

    Page 91Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 95 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    96/117

    Page 92Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 96 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    97/117

    Page 93Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 97 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    98/117

    Page 94Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 98 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    99/117

    Page 95Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 99 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    100/117

    Page 96Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 100 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    101/117

    Page 97Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 101 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    102/117

    Page 98Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 102 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    103/117

    Page 99Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 103 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    104/117

    Page 100Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 104 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    105/117

    Page 101Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 105 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    106/117

    Page 102Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 106 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    107/117

    Page 103Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 107 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    108/117

    Page 104Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 108 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    109/117

    Page 105Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 109 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    110/117

    Page 106Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 110 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    111/117

    Page 107Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 111 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    112/117

    Page 108Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 112 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    113/117

    Page 109Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 113 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    114/117

    Page 110Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 114 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    115/117

    Page 111Exhibit 2

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 115 of 115

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    116/117

    65HY CIVIL COVER SHEET7KH-6FLYLOFRYHUVKHHWDQGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQQHLWKHUUHSODFHQRUVXSSOHPHQWWKHILOLQJDQGVHUYLFHRISOHDGLQJVRURWKHUSDSHUVDVUHTXLUHGE\ODZH[FHSW

    URYLGHGE\ORFDOUXOHVRIFRXUW7KLVIRUPDSSURYHGE\WKH-XGLFLDO&RQIHUHQFHRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLQ6HSWHPEHULVUHTXLUHGIRUWKHXVHRIWKH&OHUNRI&RXUWIRUWKHXUSRVHRILQLWLDWLQJWKHFLYLOGRFNHWVKHHW(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

    . (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS

    (b) &RX QW\R I5 HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG3ODLQWLII & RX QW\RI5 HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG'HIHQG DQW

    (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

    127( ,1/$1'&21'(01$7,21&$6(686(7+(/2&$7,212)7+(75$&72)/$1',192/9('

    (c)$WWRUQH\V(Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) $WWRUQH\V(If Known)

    I. BASIS OF JURISDICTION(Place an X in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for (For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant

    u 86*RYHUQPHQW u )HGHUDO4XHVWLRQ PTF DEF PTF D

    3ODLQWLII (U.S. Government Not a Party) &LWL]HQRI7KLV6WDWH u u ,QFRUSRUDWHGor3ULQFLSDO3ODFH u

    RI%XVLQHVV,Q7KLV6WDWH

    u 86*RYHUQPHQW u 'LYHUVLW\ &LWL]HQRI$QRWKHU6WDWH u u ,QFRUSRUDWHGand3ULQFLSDO3ODFH u

    'HIHQGDQW (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) RI%XVLQHVV,Q$QRWKHU6WDWH

    &LWL]HQRU6XEMHFWRID u u )RUHLJQ1DWLRQ u

    )RUHLJQ&RXQWU\

    V. NATURE OF SUIT(Place an X in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES

    u ,QVXUDQFH PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY u 'UXJ5HODWHG6HL]XUH u $SSHDO86& u )DOVH&ODLPV$FW

    u 0DULQH u $LUSODQH u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\ RI3URSHUW\86& u :LWKGUDZDO u 6WDWH5HDSSRUWLRQP

    u 0LOOHU$FW u $LUSODQH3URGXFW 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u 2WKHU 86& u $QWLWUXVW

    u 1HJRWLDEOH,QVWUXPHQW /LDELOLW\ u +HDOWK&DUH u %DQNVDQG%DQNLQJ

    u 5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW u $VVDXOW/LEHO 3KDUPDFHXWLFDO PROPERTY RIGHTS u &RPPHUFH

    (QIRUFHPHQWRI-XGJPHQW 6ODQGHU 3HUVRQDO,QM XU\ u &RS\ULJKWV u 'HSRUWDWLRQ

    u 0HGLFDUH$FW u )HGHUDO(PSOR\HUV 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u 3DWHQW u 5DFNHWHHU,QIOXHQFH

    u 5HFRYHU\RI'HIDXOWHG /LDELOLW\ u $VEHVWRV3HUVRQDO u 7UDGHPDUN &RUUXSW2UJDQL]DWLR

    6WXGHQW/RDQV u 0DULQH ,QMXU\3URGXFW u &RQVXPHU&UHGLW

    ([FOXGHV9HWHUDQV u 0D ULQH 3 UR GX FW /LD ELOL W\ LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY u &DEOH6DW79

    u 5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW /LDELOLW\ PERSONAL PROPERTY u )DLU/DERU6WDQGDUGV u +,$II u 6HFXULWLHV&RPPRG

    RI9HWHUDQV%HQHILWV u 0RWRU9HKLFOH u 2WKHU)UDXG $FW u %O DFN/ XQJ ([FKDQJH

    u 6WRFNKROGHUV6XLWV u 0RWRU9HKLFOH u 7UXWKLQ/HQGLQJ u /DERU0DQDJHPHQW u ',:&',::J u 2WKHU6WDWXWRU\$FW

    u 2WKHU&RQWUDFW 3URGXFW/LDELOLW \ u 2WKH U3 HU VRQ DO 5HODWLR QV u 66,'7LWOH;9, u $JULFXOWXUDO$FWV

    u &RQWUDFW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u 2 WK HU 3 HU VR QD O 3U RS HU W\ 'D PD JH u 5DLOZD\/DERU$FW u 56,J u (QYLURQPHQWDO0DWW

    u )UDQFKLVH ,QMXU\ u 3URSHUW\'DPDJH u )DPLO\DQG0HGLFDO u )UHHGRPRI,QIRUPD

    u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\ 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ /HDYH$FW $FW0HGLFDO0DOSUDFWLFH u 2WKHU/DERU/LWLJDWLRQ u $UELWUDWLRQ

    REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS u (PSOR\HH5HWLUHPHQW FEDERAL TAX SUITS u $GPLQLVWUDWLYH3URF

    u /DQG&RQGHPQDWLRQ u 2WKHU&LYLO5LJKWV Habeas Corpus: ,QFRPH6HFXULW\$FW u 7D[HV863ODLQWLII $FW5HYLHZRU$SSH

    u )RUHFORVXUH u 9RWLQJ u $OLHQ'HWDLQHH RU'HIHQGDQW $JHQF\'HFLVLRQ

    u 5HQW/HDVH(MHFWPHQW u (PSOR\PHQW u 0RWLRQVWR9DFDWH u ,567KLUG3DUW\ u &RQVWLWXWLRQDOLW\RI

    u 7RUWVWR/DQG u +RXVLQJ 6HQWHQFH 86& 6WDWH6WDWXWHV

    u 7RUW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ $FFRPPRGDWLRQV u *HQHUDO

    u $OO2WKHU5HDO3URSHUW\ u $PHUZ'LVDELOLWLHV u 'HDWK3HQDOW\ IMMIGRATION

    (PSOR\PHQW Other: u 1DWXUDOL]DWLRQ$SSOLFDWLRQu $PHUZ'LVDELOLWLHV u 0DQGDPXV2WKHU u 2WKHU,PPLJUDWLRQ

    2WKHU u &LYLO5LJ KWV $F WLRQV

    u (GXFDWLRQ u 3ULVRQ&RQGLWLRQ

    u &LYLO'HWDLQHH

    &RQGLWLRQVRI

    &RQILQHPHQW

    V. ORIGIN(Place an X in One Box Only)

    u 2ULJLQDO3URFHHGLQJ

    u 5HPRYHGIURP6WDWH&RXUW

    u 5HPDQGHGIURP$SSHOODWH&RXUW

    u 5HLQVWDWHGRU5HRSHQHG

    u 7UDQVIHUUHGIURP$QRWKHU'LVWULFW(specify)

    u 0XOWLGLVWULFW/LWLJDWLRQ

    VI. CAUSE OF ACTION

    &LWHWKH86&LYLO6WDWXWHXQGHUZKLFK\RXDUHILOLQJ(Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity)

    %ULHIGHVFULSWLRQRIFDXVH

    VII. REQUESTED IN

    COMPLAINT:

    u &+(&.,)7+,6,6$CLASS ACTION

    81'(558/()5&Y3

    DEMAND $ &+(&.

  • 7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah - Complaint

    117/117

    -65HYHUVH5HY

    INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44

    $XWKRULW\)RU&LYLO&RYHU6KHHW

    7KH-6FLYLOFRYHUVKHHWDQGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQQHLWKHUUHSODFHVQRUVXSSOHPHQWVWKHILOLQJVDQGVHUYLFHRISOHDGLQJRURWKHUSDSHUVDV

    UHTXLUHGE\ODZH[FHSWDVSURYLGHGE\ORFDOUXOHVRIFRXUW7KLVIRUPDSSURYHGE\WKH-XGLFLDO&RQIHUHQFHRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLQ6HSWHPEHULV

    UHTXLUHGIRUWKHXVHRIWKH&OHUNRI&RXUWIRUWKHSXUSRVHRILQLWLDWLQJWKHFLYLOGRFNHWVKHHW&RQVHTXHQWO\DFLYLOFRYHUVKHHWLVVXEPLWWHGWRWKH&OHUNR

    &RXUWIRUHDFKFLYLOFRPSODLQWILOHG7KHDWWRUQH\ILOLQJDFDVHVKRXOGFRPSOHWHWKHIRUPDVIROORZV

    I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants.(QWHUQDPHVODVWILUVWPLGGOHLQLWLDORISODLQWLIIDQGGHIHQGDQW,IWKHSODLQWLIIRUGHIHQGDQWLVDJRYHUQPHQWDJHQF\XV

    RQO\WKHIXOOQDPHRUVWDQGDUGDEEUHYLDWLRQV,IWKHSODLQWLIIRUGHIHQGDQWLVDQRIILFLDOZLWKLQDJRYHUQPHQWDJHQF\LGHQWLI\ILUVWWKHDJHQF\DQGWKHQWKHRIILFLDOJLYLQJERWKQDPHDQGWLWOH

    (b) County of Residence.)RUHDFKFLYLOFDVHILOHGH[FHSW86SODLQWLIIFDVHVHQWHUWKHQDPHRIWKHFRXQW\ZKHUHWKHILUVWOLVWHGSODLQWLIIUHVLGHVDW

    WLPHRIILOLQJ,Q86SODLQWLIIFDVHVHQWHUWKHQDPHRIWKHFRXQW\LQZKLFKWKHILUVWOLVWHGGHIHQGDQWUHVLGHVDWWKHWLPHRIILOLQJ127(,QODQ

    FRQGHPQDWLRQFDVHVWKHFRXQW\RIUHVLGHQFHRIWKHGHIHQGDQWLVWKHORFDWLRQRIWKHWUDFWRIODQGLQYROYHG

    (c) Attorneys.(QWHUWKHILUPQDPHDGGUHVVWHOHSKRQHQXPEHUDQGDWWRUQH\RIUHFRUG,IWKHUHDUHVHYHUDODWWRUQH\VOLVWWKHPRQDQDWWDFKPHQWQR

    LQWKLVVHFWLRQVHHDWWDFKPHQW

    II. Jurisdiction.7KHEDVLVRIMXULVGLFWLRQLVVHWIRUWKXQGHU5XOHD)5&Y3ZKLFKUHTXLUHVWKDWMXULVGLFWLRQVEHVKRZQLQSOHDGLQJV3ODFHDQ

    LQRQHRIWKHER[HV,IWKHUHLVPRUHWKDQRQHEDVLVRIMXULVGLFWLRQSUHFHGHQFHLVJLYHQLQWKHRUGHUVKRZQEHORZ

    8QLWHG6WDWHVSODLQWLII-XULVGLFWLRQEDVHGRQ86&DQG6XLWVE\DJHQFLHVDQGRIILFHUVRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVDUHLQFOXGHGKHUH

    8QLWHG6WDWHVGHIHQGDQW:KHQWKHSODLQWLIILVVXLQJWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLWVRIILFHUVRUDJHQFLHVSODFHDQ;LQWKLVER[

    )HGHUDOTXHVWLRQ7KLVUHIHUVWRVXLWVXQGHU86&ZKHUHMXULVGLFWLRQDULVHVXQGHUWKH&RQVWLWXWLRQRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVDQDPHQGP

    WRWKH&RQVWLWXWLRQDQDFWRI&RQJUHVVRUDWUHDW\RIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV,QFDVHVZKHUHWKH86LVDSDUW\WKH86SODLQWLIIRUGHIHQGDQWFRGHWDN

    SUHFHGHQFHDQGER[RUVKRXOGEHPDUNHG

    'LYHUVLW\RIFLWL]HQVKLS7KLVUHIHUVWRVXLWVXQGHU86&ZKHUHSDUWLHVDUHFLWL]HQVRIGLIIHUHQWVWDWHV:KHQ%R[LVFKHFNHGWKH

    FLWL]HQVKLSRIWKHGLIIHUHQWSDUWLHVPXVWEHFKHFNHG. 6HH6HFWLRQ,,,EHORZ; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity

    cases.

    III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties.7KLVVHFWLRQRIWKH-6LVWREHFRPSOHWHGLIGLYHUVLW\RIFLWL]HQVKLSZDVLQGLFDWHGDERYH0DUN

    VHFWLRQIRUHDFKSULQFLSDOSDUW\

    IV. Nature of Suit.3ODFHDQ;LQWKHDSSURSULDWHER[,IWKHQDWXUHRIVXLWFDQQRWEHGHWHUPLQHGEHVXUHWKHFDXVHRIDFWLRQLQ6HFWLRQ9,EHORZ

    VXIILFLHQWWRHQDEOHWKHGHSXW\FOHUNRUWKHVWDWLVWLFDOFOHUNVLQWKH$GPLQLVWUDWLYH2IILFHWRGHWHUPLQHWKHQDWXUHRIVXLW,IWKHFDXVHILWVPRUHWK

    RQHQDWXUHRIVXLWVHOHFWWKHPRVWGHILQLWLYH

    V. Origin.3ODFHDQ;LQRQHRIWKHVL[ER[HV

    2ULJLQDO3URFHHGLQJV&DVHVZKLFKRULJLQDWHLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVGLVWULFWFRXUWV

    5HPRYHGIURP6WDWH&RXUW3URFHHGLQJVLQLWLDWHGLQVWDWHFRXUWVPD\EHUHPRYHGWRWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWVXQGHU7LWOH86&6HFWLRQ

    :KHQWKHSHWLWLRQIRUUHPRYDOLVJUDQWHGFKHFNWKLVER[5HPDQGHGIURP$SSHOODWH&RXUW&KHFNWKLVER[IRUFDVHVUHPDQGHGWRWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWIRUIXUWKHUDFWLRQ8VHWKHGDWHRIUHPDQGDVWKHILOL

    GDWH

    5HLQVWDWHGRU5HRSHQHG&KHFNWKLVER[IRUFDVHVUHLQVWDWHGRUUHRSHQHGLQWKHGLVWULFWFRXUW8VHWKHUHRSHQLQJGDWHDVWKHILOLQJGDWH

    7UDQVIHUUHGIURP$QRWKHU'LVWULFW)RUFDVHVWUDQVIHUUHGXQGHU7LWOH86&6HFWLRQD'RQRWXVHWKLVIRUZLWKLQGLVWULFWWUDQVIHUVR

    Case 3:13-cv-02281-AJB-NLS Document 1-1 Filed 09/23/13 Page 2 of 2