Premature ovarian failure in breast cancer How …BMS April 2013 Premature ovarian failure in breast...
Transcript of Premature ovarian failure in breast cancer How …BMS April 2013 Premature ovarian failure in breast...
BMS
April 2013
Premature ovarian failure in breast cancerHow definitive? Measurement & Prognosis
Patrick Neven, MD PhDGynaecologic Oncology
Multidisciplinary Breast Center UZ Gasthuisberg
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Hormones play a critical role in breast cancer carcinogenesis: Aromatase
Androstenedione↔ Testosterone
Estrone ↔ Estradiol
Estronesulfate
↔ ↔
↔AROMATASE
Premenopausal OvariesCyclical Changes
Postmenopausal women- Subcutaneous fatBreast: -Normal tissue-Tumor
SHBG
SHBG
Premenopause FP Free E2 ~ ERPR+ BrCa risk (Eliassen NHS-II JNCI 2006)- 1996-1999 2003 : 197/18521 women developed breast cancer Q1-Q4 RR: 2.8
Postmenopause Free E2 ~ ERPR+ BrCa risk up to 20 yrs (Zhang NHS-I BCRT 2013)
-1989-1990 2010: 707/32826 women developed breast cancer Q1-Q4 RR: 2.8
How do we interfere in estrogen binding in ER-positive breast cancer?
How frequent? Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea
Tamoxifen-induced amenorrhea
Post LHRH-induced amenorrhea
Post R*-castration induced amenorrhea
Post BSO induced amenorrhea
Post-pil amenorrhea, stress, low BMI
How measure if definitive ?
Issues if no definitive menopause?
Tamoxifen
Oral aromatase inhibitors
Extended anti-E therapy
Premature Ovarian Insufficiency in breast cancer
EfficacyToxicityContraceptive needs
]For >12 monthsDefinitive?…
How frequent? More data for vaginal bleeding than for FSH, E2
Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea ~ Age, type, duration, tam Tamoxifen without previous CT: >12 months amenorrhea = rare
“> 12 months” amenorrhea in breast cancerDefinitive? Measurement & Prognosis
Petrek J A et al. JCO 2006;24:1045-1051
How frequent? More data for vaginal bleeding than for FSH, E2
Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea ~ Age, type, duration, tam Tamoxifen without previous CT: >12 months amenorrhea = rare
“> 12 months” amenorrhea in breast cancerDefinitive? Measurement & Prognosis
Cave comparison of rates of CIA across different studies-Considerable differences in treatments used, -Addition of anti-E, -Follow-up duration,-Variability in the definition of CIA (3 m. - 1 yr no menses)-Biochemical bias (what is a high FSH and low E2?)-Amenorrhea and LNG-IUD
Follicular phase chemotherapyInhertitable factors
Specific genesBreast cancer ‘per se”
How frequent? More data for vaginal bleeding than for FSH, E2
Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea ~ Age, type, duration, tam Tamoxifen & no previous CT: >12 m. amenorrhea = rare
“> 12 months” amenorrhea in breast cancerDefinitive? Measurement & Prognosis
Petrek J A et al. JCO 2006;24:1045-1051
↑FSH elevated
E2: LowSymptoms
↑FSH lowE2: HighProg: ~
Ovarian CystsNo Symptoms
Tamoxifen-induced amenorrhea~ AGE
No CT; after LHRH-agonist only: irregular cycles, oligomenorrhea, no effect on age menopause
After CT: decreases bleeding between months 12 and 24 after chemotherapy with 15% fewer women having bleeding.
After CT OS with LHRH-agonist: prolongs CIA and chance to develop definitive menopause but date for the last statement arecontroversial
However, how tamoxifen influences CIA/CIM remains unclear.
Suggested has made that it increases plasma E2 and Prog & interferes with endometrial decidualisation and the hypothalamic–ovarian feedback loop that regulates E-synthesis
How frequent? How insufficient is insufficient? Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea
Tamoxifen-induced amenorrhea
Post LHRH-induced amenorrhea
Post R*-castration induced amenorrhea
Post BSO induced amenorrhea
Post-pil amenorrhea, stress, low BMI
How best to measurement definitive menopause?
How insufficient is insufficient?
Issues if no definitive menopause?
Tamoxifen
Oral aromatase inhibitors Extended anti-E therapy
“> 12 months” amenorrhea in breast cancerDefinitive? Measurement & Prognosis
EfficacyToxicityContraceptive needs
]For >12 months and than…
HOW INSUFFICIENT IS INSUFFICIENT?
THERE IS NO CLINICAL MARKER
THERE IS NO RELIABLE BIOCHEMICAL MARKER
Reliable assessment E2 is mostly lacking
THERE IS NO TVU MARKER (AFC)
Tam & AIs are able to induce follicles….
6 casesBiochemicalMenopause
AI-InducedOvarian Recovery
AS DieudonnéeMenopause 2011
AMH of no help
A special case Mrs S; °1945
1986: R. breast cancer: WE and ALND + RT. 2001: L. breast cancer: WE + ALND + RT + Tam
2002: Typical menstrual cycles (EB: proliferative)
2002: LHRH ag 6m + Anastrozole
2002: Anastrozole and postmenopausal E2 levels 2003: PMB and high E2 levels (327 pg/mL)
US: follicle and thickened endometrial (EB: proliferative)
2004: Tamoxifen : menorraghia.
D&C: Proliferative changes in endometrium. Progesterone ~ 4 .7 µg/L
follicular: 0.2 - 1.5 µg/L; ovulatory: 0.8 - 3.0 µg/Lluteal: 1.7 - 27.0 µg/L; postmenopausal: 0.1 - 0.8 µg/L
18 enrolled subjects
4 with BL elevated E2
14 subjects initiatedanastrozole
4 subjects without increased E2 at
wk 48
2 withdrawals:Subject preferenceNoncompliance
8 (57%) subjects withincreased E2
by wk 48
51 enrolled subjects
4 with BL elevated E22 withdrawals
45 subjects initiatedanastrozole
19 subjects without increased E2 at
wk 48
13 withdrawals:Toxicity (n=9)Subject/physician preference (n=2)Noncompliance (n=2)
13 (29%) subjects withincreased E2
by wk 48
EnrolledN=69 CIA
Part 1 Part 2
Michigan University : APPEL Trial Schema
Henry et al, Ann Oncol, in press
Characteristic All patients (N=45)
Ovarian function recovery (N=13)
No ovarian function recovery
(N=19)
Median age at chemotherapy, yrs (range) 48 (40-55) 43 (40-51) 49 (44-52)
Median age at AI therapy, yrs (range) 50 (40-56) 45 (40-56) 50 (46-55)
Mean BMI (SD) 27.6 (7.8) 29.2 (12.1) 26.7 (4.8)Prior chemotherapy regimen-No taxane-Taxane-based
9 (20%)36 (80%)
2 (15%)13 (85%)
3 (16%)16 (84%)
Median time since chemotherapy, yrs 1.4 (0.3-5.9) 0.6 (0.4-4.8) 2.0 (0.4-5.9)
Prior tamoxifen, no (%) 28 (62%) 7 (54%) 14 (74%)Mean baseline estradiol, pg/ml (SD) 8.4 (7.8) 9.5 (8.5) 8.4 (8.4)
Mean baseline FSH (SD)- prior tamoxifen- no prior tamoxifen
56.4 (31.1)43.3 (23.1)78.5 (29.4)
55.8 (28.4)51.7 (30.7)80.3 (14.8)
54.2 (28.2)44.9 (24.5)78.4 (24.1)
Mean baseline AMH <0.17 <0.17 <0.17Mean baseline Inhibin B 10.1 (0.4) 10.3 (0.8) <10Time to primary endpoint, months 2.1 (0.6-11.9) NA
Patient Characteristics
Henry et al, Ann Oncol, in press
APPEL Trial: Results
• 45 women who developed chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure defined by all means possible were enrolled and treated with anastrozole for 18 months– Recovered ovarian function: 28.9%
– Did not recover ovarian function: 42.2%
– Discontinued AI for other reason: 28.9%• Primarily due to toxicity
RecoveredOvarian Function
RemainedPostmenopausal
Age at Chemotherapy Initiation
Recovery of Ovarian Function During AI Therapy By Age
Henry et al, Ann Oncol, in press
Multivariable Analysis of Predictors of Ovarian Function Recovery
Predictor Odds Ratio P value
Age at chemotherapy 0.48 (0.30-0.77) 0.0022
Time since chemotherapy 0.90 (0.35-2.28) 0.81
BMI 25-30 vs <25
>30 vs <25
1.91 (0.16-23.22)
1.50 (0.13-17.87)
0.61
0.75
Menses at chemotherapy (irregular vs regular)
0.21 (0.01-5.60) 0.35
Prior Tamoxifen (yes vs no) 0.29 (0.02-5.62) 0.41
Baseline estradiol 0.91 (0.74-1.11) 0.34
Henry et al, Ann Oncol, in press
How frequent? Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea
Tamoxifen-induced amenorrhea
Post LHRH-induced amenorrhea
Post R*-castration induced amenorrhea
Post BSO induced amenorrhea
Post-pil amenorrhea, stress, low BMI
How best to measurement definitive menopause?
Issues if no definitive menopause?
Tamoxifen
Oral aromatase inhibitors
Extended anti-E therapy
“> 12 months” amenorrhea in breast cancerDefinitive? Measurement & Prognosis
EfficacyToxicityContraceptive needs
]For >12 months and than…
Fertility: Proper Contraception! Contraceptive needs: Always up to what age?
Two pregnancies on AI: 37 yrs M* / 46 yrs Adj
Safety endometrium: Unopposed estrogen Cyclical progestins? LNG-IUD? OS?
Ov Insufficiency ~ amenorrhea in breast cancerWhat if no definitive menopause?
Who should not use LNG IUS?• Has an untreated pelvic infection now
• Has had a serious pelvic infection in the past 3 months after a pregnancy
• Can get infections easily
• Has or is suspected to have cancer of the uterus or cervix
• Has unexplained bleeding from the vagina
• Has liver disease or liver tumor
• Has or has had breast cancer
• Has a condition of the uterus that changes the shape of the uterine cavity, such as large fibroid tumors
A woman should not use LNG IUS if she:
Mirena prescribing information March 22, 2011
The system contains 52 mg of the hormone levonorgestrel and releases 20µg/24h in the “uterus” for up to five years of protection
Fertility: Proper Contraception! Safety endometrium: Unopposed estrogen
Cyclical progestins? LNG-IUD? OS?
Efficacy tamoxifen? Independent of menopausal status
Should we suppress ovaries?
Value of OS + Tam vs Tam (toxicity)
ZIPP, ABC: controversial outcome Value LHRH-meta-analysis
Ov Insufficiency ~ amenorrhea in breast cancerWhat if no definitive menopause?
Small subset :Tamoxifen ± LHRH (n=1013)
RECURRENCERECURRENCE DEATH AFTER RECURRENCEDEATH AFTER RECURRENCE
010
2030
4050
Dea
th a
fter r
ecur
renc
e (%
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Years since randomisation
HR=0.84, 95% CI = [0.59-1.19], P=0.33
TamoxifenLHRH + tamoxifen
010
2030
4050
Rec
urre
nce
(%)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Years since randomisation
HR=0.85, 95% CI = [0.67-1.09], P=0.20
TamoxifenLHRH + tamoxifen
8.8% vs. 7.3%1.5% reduction
22.8% vs. 18.2%4.6% reduction
Do we need OS if Tam?Meta-Analysis ‘LHRH’-agonists
7,3 yrs of FU
J. Cuzick in Lancet 2007
SOFT TRIAL-Tamoxifen-OS + Tamoxifen-OS + Exemestane
QOL- endpointEfficacy endpoint
Many clinicians meanwhile continue to add OS …
QOL & LONG – TERM TOXICITY
CIA vs no-CIAPrognostic Importance After CT
Swain et al NEJM 2010
HR Recurrence Death
ER-positive 0.51 0.52
ER-negative 0.96 1.08
This clearly reflects importance of ovarian targetted effect of CTNo hit to ovary ~ No hit to subclinical breast cancer
Not necessary via hormonal effect This therefore doesn’t mean one can reduce relapse/death risk by + OS
5228 women with node-pos disease AC vs ACT vs ACTCIA = prognostic if ER-pos breast cancer
ASCO ENDORSEMENT OF CANCER CARE ONTARIO GUIDELINES REGARDING OS by GRIGGS et al. JCO 2011
Adjuvante hormonale therapie ER positive breast cancer:
The Leuven Guidelines45-52 yrs of age
TAMOXIFEN at least 5 yearsExtended: Tam or AI
LONGER IS BETTER!
Not <50 yrs
Extended adjuvant – MA.17 study
Peri-menopausal: 45 - 52 yrsIntermediate or high risk for relapse
[AI] or [Tamswitch] bij CT-amenorrhea– Amenorrhea 12 m ≠ Menopauze (Tam, AI)
• Contraception• Switch to AI
– FSH, Oestradiol, very variable» AI: high FSH, low E2 = temporarely
» Tam: “low” FSH, low E2 can be menopause*Hypogonadotrophe hypo-oestrogenic amenorrhea» Exemestane false positive E2 and ProgHigh FSH and E2 likely to be menopauseAromasin
FSH: 99.2 IU/L Estradiol 32 ng/L
TamoxifenFSH: 37.8 IU/L FSH: 8 IU/L*Estradiol 8 ng/L
Anastrozole/ LetrozoleFSH: 99.2 IU/L Estradiol <5 ng/L
SHOULD WE add OS to safely give AI?
Med FU 62 monthsJCO 2011
WORSE OS AI>TAMHR: 1.75 (1.08-2.83) TEXT TRIAL
Conclusion:Breast Cancer Therapy –
Induced Prolonged AmenorrheaImportant topic: Many premenopausals get CT
Ovarian Insufficiancy differs from menopause
Definition & Measurement impossible!
Many consequences
Avoid AI therapy if CIA < 52 yrs of age
Promote extended anti-E (Tam or AI ~age)
Important Prognostic Factor after CT
Also predictive for adding OS? Await SOFT