Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

11
Clinical Evaluation under the proposed EU regulation for Medical Devices| Westervoort, 05 January 2014 Annet Muetstege

description

Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the current version of the European Medical Device Regulation proposal. What are key elements and how does it impact the clinical evidence needs?

Transcript of Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

Page 1: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

Clinical Evaluation under the proposed

EU regulation for Medical Devices|

Westervoort, 05 January 2014

Annet Muetstege

Page 2: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

05 Jan 2014 ACS Premarket Clinical Evaluation 2

Medical Devices: a diverse sector

Page 3: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

05 Jan 2014 ACS Premarket Clinical Evaluation 3

Proposed EU MDR – Dec 2013

• Current version proposed regulation on Medical Devices►Active Implantable Medical Devices and Medical Devices Directive

combined

►Regulation

► (re)Classification – more Class III medical devices

► Includes requirements on Premarket Clinical Evaluation, Postmarket

Clinical Follow-Up, and Clinical Investigations

• Timelines►EU Council debate 10/12/2013

►EU Parliament elections May 2014

►Entry into force 2015?

Page 4: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

05 Jan 2014 ACS Premarket Clinical Evaluation 4

Clinical Evaluation

• Demonstration of clinical benefit needed for all devices:

″ ‘clinical evaluation’ means the assessment and analysis of clinical data pertaining to a device in order to verify the safety and, performance and clinical benefits of the device when used as intended by the manufacturer.

• Main drivers clinical evidence needs for the clinical evaluation

►Class of device

►Available relevant clinical evidence

►Claims including the intended population

►Primary market

Page 5: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

05 Jan 2014 ACS Premarket Clinical Evaluation 5

Medical Device Class

• Class IIb and III need a Clinical Trial:″ In the case of devices falling within Article 43a(1), with the

exception of those used for a short term, clinical investigations shall be performed …

• Clinical Trial should be a RCT:″ As randomised controlled investigations usually generate a

higher level of evidence for clinical efficacy and safety, the useof any other design or study has to be justified.

Page 6: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

05 Jan 2014 ACS Premarket Clinical Evaluation 6

Existing Clinical Evidence

• More specific and independent sources of existing clinical data for the clinical evaluation are needed:

″ Data from independent scientific institutions or medical societiesbased on their own collections of clinical data shall also be taken into account.

• Using existing clinical evidence, device equivalence on intended purpose and device characteristics should be clear:

″ Equivalence can only be demonstrated when the device that is subject to clinical evaluation and the device to which the existing clinical data relates have the same intended purpose and …characteristics of the devices and the medical procedures … not a clinically significant difference in the safety and performance of the devices.

Page 7: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

05 Jan 2014 ACS Premarket Clinical Evaluation 7

Claims

• In case a Clinical Trial is needed, also

clinical evidence on efficacy in the

intended patient population is

required:″ Clinical investigations shall be … defined in such a way

as to confirm or refute the technical performance of the device, the clinical safety and efficacy of the device whenused for the intended purpose in the target populationand in accordance with the instructions of use, and the manufacturer's claims for the device …

Page 8: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

05 Jan 2014 ACS Premarket Clinical Evaluation 8

Primary market

• Standard of Care and therefore control

therapy tends to differ by country and

expert

• RCT needs design according to best clinical

practices in primary market:″ As randomised controlled investigations usually generate a

higher level of evidence for clinical efficacy and safety, the use of any other design or study has to be justified. Also the choice of the control intervention shall be justified. Both justifications shall be provided by independent experts with the necessary qualifications and expertise.

Page 9: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

05 Jan 2014 ACS Premarket Clinical Evaluation 9

Conclusion

• Current version of the European Medical Device Regulation demands a more extensive clinical evidence base for the Premarket Clinical Evaluation on devices.

• References:

► Propsed EU regulation: http://ec.europa.eu/health/medical-devices/files/revision_docs/proposal_2012_542_en.pdf

► EU Parliament adopted amendments: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-428

► Consolidated proposed MDR: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/15083837/Consolidated%20Version%20proposal_2012_542_en%20medical%20devices%20Word.pdf

Page 10: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

05 Jan 2014 ACS Premarket Clinical Evaluation 10

Questions?

Applied Clinical Services BV

[email protected]

+31 26 848 5281

Page 11: Premarket Clinical Evaluation under the EU MDR proposal

05 Jan 2014 ACS Premarket Clinical Evaluation 11

Applied Clinical Services BV

• Co-founded by Annet Muetstege

• Mission► To contribute to better patient outcomes in health care by partnering with medical

device industry and ensuring that product safety & efficacy claims are supported by

adequate clinical evidence in the most cost-effective manner

• Core services

►Strategic Clinical Evidence PlanningWhat, where, when, how

►Clinical evidence communicationReports, abstracts, M&S material and training

►Clinical project managementProject design, progress, and (co-)monitoring