Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for...

29
Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Transcript of Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for...

Page 1: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Preliminary Assessment

Tribal Emergency Response

Preparedness

Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURPAgency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Page 2: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Project Objectives

• To assess Tribal emergency preparedness and response capabilities, with special focus on radiological hazards.

• To identify support and training needs of Tribes related to emergency preparedness.

Page 3: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Project Objectives(continued)

• To engage Tribal communities in emergency preparedness response activities.

• To help establish criteria and mechanisms for improving, enhancing, or possibly developing integrated Tribal programs related to emergency response.

Page 4: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Project Triggers• Tribal lands are often in rural settings

and/or cover large areas.

• If chemical, biological, or radiological release occurs, Tribes may be the primary government entity to respond.

• Outside agencies need to understand how well prepared Tribes are and what support needs exist.

Page 5: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Accomplishments to Date• Set up pilot assessment to obtain data

from a cross-section of Tribes.

• Identified and selected nine Tribes to participate in the pilot assessment.

• Conducted in-person interviews with the nine Tribes during the summer-fall 2003.

Page 6: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Accomplishments to Date (continued)

• Conducted follow-up with Tribes as needed to ensure completeness and accuracy of Tribe-specific data.

• Compiled findings, prepared Tribe-specific reports.

• Developed a summary report of overall findings.

Page 7: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

MethodsCriteria for Selecting Tribes

• Proximity to major transportation routes.

• Proximity to nuclear/chemical facilities or Department of Defense or Energy sites.

• Potential presence of unregulated landfills (radioactive waste).

• Proximity to U.S. borders.

Page 8: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Methods Data Collection

• Interviewed Tribal representatives one-on-one or in small group settings.

• Topics discussed:- Overall knowledge and understanding- Infrastructure and equipment- Emergency preparedness planning- Communications- Training- Support needs

Page 9: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

MethodsData Compilation

• Extracted and compiled the information recorded during interviews and follow-up communications.

• Prepared Tribe-specific reports and compiled aggregate data in single summary report, identifying overall observations and trends.

Page 10: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Participating Tribes

Page 11: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Size of Participating Tribes

• < 5,000 (3 Tribes)

• 5,001-15,000 (2 Tribes)

• 15,001-30,000 (1Tribe)

• >30,000 (3 Tribes)

Page 12: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Overall Findings

• Tribes are generally aware of the types of hazards and response scenarios that may arise on Tribal lands, but lack specific knowledge.

• A wide range of response preparedness was observed. Some Tribes are better equipped and have more comprehensive emergency response programs than others.

Page 13: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Overall Findings(continued)

• Some Tribes are aware that other state, county, or local emergency response plans exist, but desire more information about where the Tribes fit in.

• Tribal readiness for radiological hazards is limited. Virtually none of the Tribes have the capabilities to identify orphan sources, and most do not have equipment or training for radiological emergencies.

Page 14: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Overview: Support Needs

Tribes report that they need

• Training/technical support.

• Funding for dedicated staff and equipment.

• Improved communications within Tribal Nations and with local, county, and state agencies serving their Tribal areas.

Page 15: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Breakdown of Findings

Page 16: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Infrastructure

• Few Tribes are completely self-sufficient in terms of personnel, equipment, and resources to respond to various emergency situations.

• Most Tribes have law enforcement groups; 4 of the 9 Tribes interviewed have fire departments; others rely on outside first responder services or a combination of Tribal and outside services.

Page 17: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Infrastructure (continued)

• Most Tribes rely on outside or contract medical services. Most facilities serving Tribes are equipped to handle at least 6-20 patients in an emergency; some can treat 50 or more patients.

Page 18: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Infrastructure (continued)

0

2

4

6

8

Law Fire Medical

Emergency Response Teams

Nu

mb

er o

f T

rib

es

Tribal Non-Tribal Both

Page 19: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Equipment

• Less than half the Tribes report having emergency response equipment.

• Tribes with equipment are more prepared for chemical and biological emergencies.

• No relationship was observed between equipment inventory and the Tribal size or land mass.

Page 20: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Emergency Response Planning

• Most Tribes interviewed have some form of an emergency response plan completed or under development. All but one of these incorporates measures to respond to radiological hazards.

• Tribes report cooperation among their first responders and with outside agencies in developing response plans. Still, Tribes expressed interest in fostering more coordination with outside agencies.

Page 21: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Communications• Most Tribes have a system to communicate

with other agencies in an emergency.

• More than half the Tribes have a communications system used by first responders.

• Fewer Tribes have a system to notify the public of an emergency. Those that do often rely on radios and television, among other means.

Page 22: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Support NeedsOverall

At least a third of the Tribes interviewed requested that EPA/ATSDR share information about funding sources, technical support providers, and training tools available to Tribes (for emergency planning and increasing general knowledge about hazards faced).

Page 23: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Training

• Training in emergency response readiness varies among the Tribes. Some Tribes receive extensive training in emergency response readiness, participate in mock drills, and even train others responders.

• Most training has focused on chemical and biological hazards. Fewer responders are trained in radiological hazards or to recognize orphan sources.

Page 24: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Needed Training/ Technical Assistance

• How to safely respond to emergencies, such as the proper use of equipment, particularly for radiological and biological hazards.

• How to develop or improve emergency response plans.

• Assistance with mock drills.

Page 25: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Needed Training/ Technical Assistance

• Templates for emergency response plans.

• Useful Web sites.

• Names of training resources and providers.

Page 26: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Other Needs

• Additional funding and staff dedicated to emergency response planning and training.

• Mechanisms for enhanced information sharing with IHS, the Tribes, and other agencies (How to achieve greater coordination).

• Improved equipment and supplies.

Page 27: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Other Requests

• Inclusion of Tribes in other governmental agencies’ notification procedures.

• Demonstrated commitment from federal agencies to support Tribes.

Page 28: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Next Steps• Use pilot assessment results as a basis for

assessing all the tribes ER capabilities in the U.S.

• Expand the assessment of training/ educational needs.

- Supplement findings with other similar studies, if available.

- Refine pilot questionnaire, based on Tribal input and consider more widespread distribution.

Page 29: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.

Future Considerations• Establish training implementation strategies.

• Raise awareness of identified issues across states and Tribes.

• Form partnerships; foster collaboration among government agencies and Tribes.

• Define role of Federal agencies in the process.

• Identify funding mechanisms for staff, equipment, etc.