PREFACE APPENDIX A.4O: Advanced Metallurgical Assessment … · 2015. 10. 13. · A.4c Feasibility...
Transcript of PREFACE APPENDIX A.4O: Advanced Metallurgical Assessment … · 2015. 10. 13. · A.4c Feasibility...
-
CASINO PROJECT | Supplementary Information Report | Mar 2015
Volume A.ii: Project introduction & oVerView
Volume A.iii: BioPhysicAl VAlued comPonents
Volume A.V: AdditionAl yesAA reQuirements
Volume A.iV: socio-economic VAlued comPonents
Introduction Employment and Income
Employability
Community Vitality
Community Infrastructure and Services
Economic Development and Business Sector
Cultural Continuity
Land Use and Tenure
First Nations and Community Consultation
A.4 Project Description
A.3 Project Location
A.5 Effects Assessment Methodology
A.1A Concordance Table to the Executive Committee’s Request for Supplementary Information
A.4A Tailings Management Facility Construction Material Alternatives
A.2A Traditional Knowledge Bibliography
A.4B Information on Alternative Access Road Alignments
A.4c Feasibility Design of the Heap Leach Facility
A.4d Report on the Feasibility Design of the Tailings Management Facility
A.4F Waste Storage Area and Stockpiles Feasibility Design
A.4e Results of Additional Lab Testing of Leach Ore
A.4G Updated Hydrometeorology Report
A.4h Cold Climate Passive Treatment Systems Literature Review
A.4i Open Pit Geotechnical Design
A.4l Revised Tailings Management Facility Seepage Assessment
A.4m Processing Flow Sheets
A.4n Scoping Level Assessment of Casino Property
A.4o Advanced Metallurgical Assessment of the Casino Copper Gold Project
A.4P Production of Environmental Tailings Samples for the Casino Deposit
A.4Q Mine Site Borrow Materials Assessment Report
A.4r Report on Laboratory Geotechnical Testing of Tailings Materials
A.4j Laboratory Evaluation of the SO2/Air and Peroxide Process
A.4K Metal Uptake in Northern Constructed Wetlands
Effects of the Environment on the Project
Accidents and Malfunctions
Environmental Management
Environmental Monitoring Plans
Conclusions
References
Waste and Hazardous Materials Management Plan
Spill Contingency Management Plan
Sediment and Erosion Control Management Plan
Invasive Species Management Plan
ML/ARD Management Plan
Liquid Natural Gas Management Plan
Socio-Economic Management Plan
Road Use Plan
Economic Impacts of the Casino Mine Project
Heritage Resources Assessment Areas
Heritage Sites Summary
Terrain Features
Water Quality
Air Quality
Noise
Fish and AquaticResources
Wildlife
Rare Plants and Vegetation Health
Variability Water Balance Model Report
Water Quality Predictions Report
Potential Effects of Climate Change on the Variability Water Balance
Updated Appendix B5 to Appendix 7A
2008 Environmental Studies Report: Final
Casino Mine Site Borrow Sites ML/ARD Potential
2013-2014 Groundwater Data Report
Emissions Inventory for Construction and Operations
Casino Geochemical Source Term Development: Appendix B
Extension of Numerical Groundwater Modelling to include Dip Creek Watershed
The Effect of Acid Rock Drainage on Casino Creek
Casino Kinetic Testwork 2014 Update for Ore, Waste Rock and Tailings
Preliminary Risk Assessment Metal Leaching and Acid Rock Drainage
Toxicity Testing Reports
Appendix A2 to Casino Waste Rock and Ore Geochemical Static Test As-sessment Report: Cross-Sections
Updated Fish Habitat Offsetting Plan
Wildlife Mitigation and Monitoring Plan V.1.2.
Moose Late Winter Habitat Suitability Report
Fish Habitat Evaluation: Instream Flow and Habitat Evaluation Procedure Study
Wildlife Baseline Report V.2
A.1
A.2
A.6
A.7
A.13 A.20
A.21
A.22
A.23
A.24
A.25
A.14
A.16
A.17
A.15
A.18
A.19
A.7A
A.22A
A.22B
A.22c
A.22d
A.22h
A.22G
A.22F
A.22e
A.7B
A.7c
A.13A
A.18A
A.18B
A.7d
A.7e
A.7K
A.7m
A.8A
A.7l
A.7n
A.7F
A.7i
A.7j
A.7G
A.7h
A.8
A.9
A.10
A.12
A.11
A.10A
A.12A
A.12c
A.10B
A.12B
Volume A.i: PREFACE
Volume A.ii: Project introduction & oVerView
Volume A.iii: BioPhysicAl VAlued comPonents
Volume A.V: AdditionAl yesAA reQuirements
Volume A.iV: socio-economic VAlued comPonents
Introduction Employment and Income
Employability
Community Vitality
Community Infrastructure and Services
Economic Development and Business Sector
Cultural Continuity
Land Use and Tenure
First Nations and Community Consultation
A.4 Project Description
A.3 Project Location
A.5 Effects Assessment Methodology
A.1A Concordance Table to the Executive Committee’s Request for Supplementary Information
A.4A Tailings Management Facility Construction Material Alternatives
A.2A Traditional Knowledge Bibliography
A.4B Information on Alternative Access Road Alignments
A.4c Feasibility Design of the Heap Leach Facility
A.4d Report on the Feasibility Design of the Tailings Management Facility
A.4F Waste Storage Area and Stockpiles Feasibility Design
A.4e Results of Additional Lab Testing of Leach Ore
A.4G Updated Hydrometeorology Report
A.4h Cold Climate Passive Treatment Systems Literature Review
A.4i Open Pit Geotechnical Design
A.4l Revised Tailings Management Facility Seepage Assessment
A.4m Processing Flow Sheets
A.4n Scoping Level Assessment of Casino Property
A.4o Advanced Metallurgical Assessment of the Casino Copper Gold Project
A.4P Production of Environmental Tailings Samples for the Casino Deposit
A.4Q Mine Site Borrow Materials Assessment Report
A.4r Report on Laboratory Geotechnical Testing of Tailings Materials
A.4j Laboratory Evaluation of the SO2/Air and Peroxide Process
A.4K Metal Uptake in Northern Constructed Wetlands
Effects of the Environment on the Project
Accidents and Malfunctions
Environmental Management
Environmental Monitoring Plans
Conclusions
References
Waste and Hazardous Materials Management Plan
Spill Contingency Management Plan
Sediment and Erosion Control Management Plan
Invasive Species Management Plan
ML/ARD Management Plan
Liquid Natural Gas Management Plan
Socio-Economic Management Plan
Road Use Plan
Economic Impacts of the Casino Mine Project
Heritage Resources Assessment Areas
Heritage Sites Summary
Terrain Features
Water Quality
Air Quality
Noise
Fish and AquaticResources
Wildlife
Rare Plants and Vegetation Health
Variability Water Balance Model Report
Water Quality Predictions Report
Potential Effects of Climate Change on the Variability Water Balance
Updated Appendix B5 to Appendix 7A
2008 Environmental Studies Report: Final
Casino Mine Site Borrow Sites ML/ARD Potential
2013-2014 Groundwater Data Report
Emissions Inventory for Construction and Operations
Casino Geochemical Source Term Development: Appendix B
Extension of Numerical Groundwater Modelling to include Dip Creek Watershed
The Effect of Acid Rock Drainage on Casino Creek
Casino Kinetic Testwork 2014 Update for Ore, Waste Rock and Tailings
Preliminary Risk Assessment Metal Leaching and Acid Rock Drainage
Toxicity Testing Reports
Appendix A2 to Casino Waste Rock and Ore Geochemical Static Test As-sessment Report: Cross-Sections
Updated Fish Habitat Offsetting Plan
Wildlife Mitigation and Monitoring Plan V.1.2.
Moose Late Winter Habitat Suitability Report
Fish Habitat Evaluation: Instream Flow and Habitat Evaluation Procedure Study
Wildlife Baseline Report V.2
A.1
A.2
A.6
A.7
A.13 A.20
A.21
A.22
A.23
A.24
A.25
A.14
A.16
A.17
A.15
A.18
A.19
A.7A
A.22A
A.22B
A.22c
A.22d
A.22h
A.22G
A.22F
A.22e
A.7B
A.7c
A.13A
A.18A
A.18B
A.7d
A.7e
A.7K
A.7m
A.8A
A.7l
A.7n
A.7F
A.7i
A.7j
A.7G
A.7h
A.8
A.9
A.10
A.12
A.11
A.10A
A.12A
A.12c
A.10B
A.12B
Volume A.i: PREFACE
VOLUME A.II: PROJECT INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW
APPENDIX A.4O: Advanced Metallurgical Assessment of the Casino Copper Gold Project
-
ADVANCED METALLURGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE
CASINO COPPER GOLD PROJECT
WHITEHORSE, YUKON
KM3512
December 20, 2012
Work Performed on behalf of Western Copper and Gold Corporation
-
1
1.0 Introduction
Western Copper and Gold Corporation is currently conducting a feasibility
assessment of the Casino Project, located 300 kilometres northwest of
Whitehorse, Yukon. The deposit is described as porphyry mineralization with
geological zones of oxide, supergene, and hypogene mineralization.
Previous test programs have developed a flotation process to extract a bulk
copper-molybdenum and gold concentrate. This program of study was intended to
produce tailings samples for environmental testing and investigate the copper-
molybdenum separation process. The program also provided an opportunity to
evaluate the process using fresh hyrogene drill core. Many of the previous test
programs had been conducted on core sample that had been in storage for a long
time and could have possibly oxidized.
This study was commissioned at the request of Dr. Paul West-Sells, President and
CEO at Western Copper and Gold Corporation. On behalf of Western Copper
and Gold Corporation, Mr. Jeff Austin of International Metallurgical and
Environmental provided technical input on the design of the program. The
objectives of this program, as described by Mr. Austin, were as follows:
- Prepare six composites for laboratory and pilot scale testing; three
composites representing geological sub-types of the hypogene zone were
designated for laboratory testing. Two separate composites of hypogene
and supergene fresh drill core sample were prepared for pilot scale testing.
A third commissioning composite for the pilot plant was also prepared
from old reject sample.
- Evaluate the metallurgical performance of the hypogene composites using
batch and locked cycle flotation tests.
-
2
- Process the pilot composites using the developed flowsheet. From the
pilot testing, obtain samples of tailings and concentrate for subsequent
testing.
- Conduct preliminary copper-molybdenum testing on the concentrate
produced from the pilot campaign.
- Assay the concentrates for minor payable and deleterious elements.
The following technical brief summarizes the key technical points of the program.
All of the test data generated through the execution of this program can be
reviewed in a series of appendices attached to this brief. The appendices are
arranged as follows:
Appendix I - Sample Origin
Appendix II - Flotation Test Data
Appendix III - Particle Sizing Data
Appendix IV - Special Assay Data
Appendix V - Pilot Plant Data
-
3
2.0 Properties of the Hypogene Composites
The chemical content of composite samples were determined by standard
assaying techniques. The results are summarized in Table 1.
Copper averaged about 0.17 percent for all of the composites. This grade was
slightly lower than some of the other samples previously investigated. Weak acid
soluble copper was low for the hypogene composites, averaging about 3 percent
of the total copper. This level is very low, indicating the samples should respond
well to the developed copper flotation process.
Gold in the samples ranged between 0.18 and 0.22 g/tonne. Molybdenum in the
sample was relatively high ranging from 0.019 to 0.071 percent by weight. The
high relative levels of molybdenum to copper should result in high levels of
molybdenum in the bulk copper concentrate.
The IX and WR samples averaged about 2.3 percent by weight sulphur.
Comparatively, the PP Composite had relatively low levels of sulphur. Although
no mineralogical analyses were conducted, past programs would suggest that
pyrite would account for most of the remaining sulphur in the sample.
On this basis, anticipated pyrite levels in the IX and WR Composites would be
high relative to the copper sulphides in the sample. Careful control of flotation
pulp conditions will be required to optimize pyrite rejection from the concentrate.
-
4
PHOTOMICROGRAPH 1CASINO – BULK 1ST CLEANER TAILING V
KM3512 Test 19
Unsized
Gn
*Cp-Chalcopyrite, Py-Pyrite, Gn-Gangue
Cp
Py
TABLE 1CHEMICAL COMPOSITION – LABORATORY HYPOGENE COMPOSITES
Cu Mo Fe Au CuOx CuCN S C Ag
PP Composite Head 1 0.13 0.031 2.97 0.22 0.004 0.008 0.74 0.46 1
PP Composite Head 2 0.14 0.029 2.92 0.22 0.003 0.007 0.74 0.45 1
Average 0.14 0.030 2.95 0.22 0.004 0.008 0.74 0.45 1
IX Composite Head 1 0.17 0.069 2.42 0.21 0.006 0.011 2.10 0.31 2
IX Composite Head 2 0.17 0.073 2.35 0.22 0.005 0.012 2.02 0.31 2
Average 0.17 0.071 2.39 0.22 0.006 0.012 2.06 0.31 2
WR Composite Head 1 0.19 0.018 2.53 0.20 0.004 0.013 2.49 0.16 1
WR Composite Head 2 0.18 0.019 2.47 0.15 0.005 0.013 2.42 0.16 1
Average 0.19 0.019 2.50 0.18 0.005 0.013 2.46 0.16 1
SampleAssay - percent or g/tonne
Note: Au and Ag are shown in g/tonne, all others are in percent.
-
5
3.0 Flotation Testing – Hypogene Composites
3.1 Rougher Test Results
A total of 14 rougher flotation tests were conducted in this program. The
tests were used to establish the initial response of the composites using
previously developed flotation conditions. Primary grind size and rougher
pH were the two primary variables investigated. A summary of the test
conditions and a graphical display of the results are shown in Figure 1.
The following conclusions were reached when reviewing the test data:
The results indicated that there was a negligible effect of primary
grind size on copper rougher flotation response over the range of
primary grind sizes tested; 150µm to 250µm K80.
For the hypogene composites, copper in the feed was about 88 to
95 percent recovered into the feed at a rougher mass recovery of
about 8 to 10 percent. The performance of the samples appeared to
be better than previously tested samples despite lower feed grades*.
Rougher pH appeared to have an effect on the metallurgical
performance. Tests conducted at higher pH had better rougher
response curves. It is assumed that the pyrite in the feed was better
depressed at higher pH allowing more aggressive copper sulphide
flotation.
Molybdenum recovery to the rougher concentrate was also highly
variable. The samples had superior performance when compared
to the other composites. Molybdenum was about 80 percent
recovered from the feed into the rougher concentrate at 9 percent
rougher mass recovery. Molybdenum flotation data is graphically
displayed in Appendix IV, Figure IV-1.
Gold recovery data was not generated for the rougher tests.
* Quantitative mineralogy on ground feed samples should be conducted to determine if the fragmentation properties were morefavourable for these samples.
-
FIGURE 1ROUGHER TEST METALLURGICAL RESPONSE
Feed
155-254µm K80
Nominal Rougher Test Conditions
Note: Detailed test conditions can be found in Appendix II.
RougherTail
Bulk Rougher Circuit
Bulk Rougher Concentrates
6
Stage pHReagents g/tonne
FO 3418A 208
Primary Grind 9.4 –11.5 10-30 - -
Rougher 9.5 – 11.2 - 6-7 12-14
PP Composite
IX Composite
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 5 10 15
Co
pp
er
Re
co
very
-p
erc
en
t
Concentrate Mass Recovery - percent
KM3512-02 WR PG178 pH11
KM3512-04 WR PG178 pH9.5
KM3512-06 WR PG211 pH9.5
KM3512-07 WR PG211 pH11
WR Composite
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 2 4 6 8 10
Co
pp
er
Re
co
very
-p
erc
en
t
Concentrate Mass Recovery - percent
KM3512-05 IX PG178 pH11
KM3512-08 IX PG234 pH11
KM3512-09 IX PG234 pH9.5
KM3512-26 IX PG155 pH11
KM3512-27 IX PG187 pH11
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 2 4 6 8 10
Co
pp
er
Re
co
very
-p
erc
en
t
Concentrate Mass Recovery - percent
KM3512-01 PP PG178 pH11
KM3512-03 PP PG178 pH9.5
KM3512-10 PP PG254 pH11
KM3512-11 PP PG254 pH9.5
KM3512-28 PP PG216 pH11
-
7
3.2 Cleaner Test Results
Based on the latest flowsheet configuration testing*, batch cleaner test
utilized regrind on the first cleaner concentrate. The flowsheet is
presented in Figure 2 along with a graphical presentation of the
metallurgical results. The tests also investigated a lower pH in the cleaner
circuit in an effort to improve molybdenum recovery.
As shown in the top graph of the figure, copper grade and recovery
performance was negatively affected by the reduction of pH in the cleaner.
For molybdenum, there was no clear benefit to metallurgical performance
by operating at a lower pH. It was, therefore, recommended to perform a
locked cycle test at pH 11 in the cleaner circuit.
A series of tests on IX Composite were performed to optimize the
chemical conditions for the first cleaner regrind (Test 22) and a
comparison to rougher regrind (Test 21). Both tests indicated an
improvement in metallurgical performance for copper and molybdenum
over the baseline test. Test 21 also indicated a slight metallurgical
performance gain with the rougher regrind circuit. The operating and
capital cost will be higher for the rougher regrind flowsheet compared to
the first cleaner regrind circuit. Further testing would be required to
confirm these test results.
* KM3134 “Advance Process Development for Casino Copper Gold Project”, March 2012.
-
FIGURE 2BATCH CLEANER METALLURGICAL PERFORMANCE
Note: Detailed test conditions can be found in Appendix II.
8
Cleaner Test Conditions
211 - 254µm K80
BulkConcentrate
BulkCleaner
Tails
RougherTails
Feed
Batch Cleaner Test Performance - Copper
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Co
pp
er
Re
co
very
-p
erc
en
t
Copper Concentrate Grade - percent
KM3512-12 WR BaseKM3512-13 IX BaseKM3512-14 PP BaseKM3512-15 WR pH10 ClnrKM3512-16 IX pH10 ClnrKM3512-17 PP pH10 ClnrKM3512-21 IX Ro R/GKM3512-22 IX Repeat
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 2 4 6 8 10
Mo
lyd
en
um
Re
co
very
-p
erc
en
t
Molybdenum Concentrate Grade - percent
KM3512-12 WR BaseKM3512-13 IX BaseKM3512-14 PP BaseKM3512-15 WR pH10 ClnrKM3512-16 IX pH10 ClnrKM3512-17 PP pH10 ClnrKM3512-21 IX Ro R/GKM3512-22 IX Repeat
Batch Cleaner Test Performance - Molybdenum
Stream pHReagents g/tonne
FO 3418A 208
Primary Grind 10.9-11.5 10 - -
Rougher 11.1-11.5 - 6-8 12-16
Cleaner 1 10.0-11.0 - 0-3 0-6
Regrind 10.0-11.1 10 - -
Cleaner 2-3 10.0-11.4 0 - 4 3-8 6-16
21 - 36µm K80
Bulk 1st
Cleaner Tail
-
9
3.3 Locked Cycle Test Results
A series of locked cycle tests were conducted in this program to establish
the estimates of metallurgical performance anticipated from a continuous
process. Both the first cleaner regrind and rougher regrind flowsheets
were tested in locked cycle for all three composites. Figure 3 displays the
rougher regrind flowsheet schematic used in these samples, along with a
summary of test results.
The first cleaner concentrate regrind data is displayed in Appendix IV,
Figure IV-2. Overall the first cleaner regrind cycle tests did not perform
as well. The reagent dosages in these tests did not appear to be full
optimized as losses of copper were high in the cleaner tailings streams.
Overall, the metallurgical performance of the rougher regrind flowsheet
was very good. Copper in the feed was 89.9, 87.2 and 91.9 percent
recovered into the bulk concentrate for IX, PP and WR Composites,
respectively. The concentrate grades range between 18 and 25 percent
copper. The concentrate grades were lower for IX and PP samples due to
high levels of molybdenum in the concentrate. The WR Composite was
also lower due to higher levels of pyrite*.
Similarly, molybdenum was 78, 79 and 89 percent recovered into the bulk
concentrates. Molybdenum grade ranged from 7.5 to 1.5 percent. Finally,
gold recoveries ranged from 55 percent to 67 percent to the bulk
concentrate.
The apparent use of recently drilled sample has resulted in arguably better
overall metallurgical performance. Additional mineralogy on these
ground feed samples should be performed to verify that the copper and
molybdenum characteristics for these samples are similar to previously
tested composites. If the characteristics are the same, this would increase
confidence that a gain in metallurgical performance will be realized by
treating fresh ore.
* The sulphur grades are high on this concentrate, perhaps indicating higher levels of pyrite.
-
FIGURE 3LOCKED CYCLE TEST RESULTS
Global Composites
Note: a) Detailed test conditions can be found in Appendix II.b) Au and Ag are shown in g/tonne, all others are in percent.
10
Locked Cycle Test Results
FeedFeed
BulkConcentrate
211-254µm K80
RougherTail
1st CleanerTail
31-32µm K80
Stream pHReagents g/tonne
FO 3418A 208
Primary Grind 11.1-11.2 10-20 - -
Rougher 11.0-11.2 - 7 14
Regrind 11.0-11.1 10 - -
Cleaners 11.0 4 8-11 16-22
Summary of Conditions
Weight Assay - percent or g/tonne Distribution - percent
% Cu Mo Fe S Ag Au Cu Mo Fe S Ag Au
KM3512-23 IX Composite
Flotation Feed 100.0 0.17 0.079 2.3 1.84 2.2 0.22 100 100 100 100 100 100
Bulk Con 0.8 18.6 7.484 27.0 34.8 126 15.6 89.9 77.9 9.4 15.5 46.5 57.3
Bulk 1st Clnr Tail 4.9 0.10 0.181 8.5 8.13 5.0 0.57 2.9 11.4 18.0 21.9 11.1 12.5
Bulk Ro Tail 94.2 0.01 0.009 1.8 1.22 1.0 0.07 7.2 10.7 72.6 62.6 42.4 30.1
KM3512-24 PP Composite
Flotation Feed 100.0 0.14 0.027 2.9 0.71 1.2 0.22 100 100 100 100 100 100
Bulk Con 0.5 24.6 4.316 25.9 33.3 107 24.3 87.2 78.6 4.4 23.4 46.0 55.4
Bulk 1st Clnr Tail 6.5 0.06 0.034 4.6 2.09 2.5 0.29 2.6 8.0 10.1 19.1 14.0 8.6
Bulk Ro Tail 93.0 0.02 0.004 2.7 0.44 0.5 0.08 10.2 13.3 85.5 57.4 40.0 36.0
KM3512-25 WR Composite
Flotation Feed 100.0 0.20 0.017 2.5 2.50 2 0.21 100 100 100 100 100 100
Bulk Con 1.0 17.5 1.502 24.9 38.8 82 13.5 91.9 89.4 10.5 16.1 53.8 67.2
Bulk 1st Clnr Tail 5.9 0.11 0.013 13.0 13.9 5 0.36 3.1 4.3 30.9 32.7 16.8 10.0
Bulk Ro Tail 93.1 0.01 0.001 1.6 1.37 1 0.05 4.9 6.4 58.6 51.2 29.4 22.8
Product
-
11
4.0 Pilot Plant Testing
Pilot plant testing was performed on three composites of Casino mineralization.
The initial pilot plant calibration was conducted on a composite constructed from
old sample from previous programs. The main campaigns were performed on two
composites constructed from fresh drill core sample. The samples represented
hypogene and supergene mineralization. Pilot runs P2 and P3 were on the PP
Hypogene Composite, runs P4 and P5 were completed on the PP Supergene
Composite.
The primary objective of the pilot campaign was to produce tailings for
environmental studies. Concentrate form the program was also used to
investigate separation of copper and molybdenum. The flowsheet used to process
the sample is shown in Figure 4, along with a summary of conditions and results.
The primary mill was operated at a nominal 100 kg per hour; copper rougher
flotation was performed in 6, 12 litre flotation cells. Pyrite flotation was
conducted in another 6, 12 litre cells. Rougher concentrate was reground in a 2
litre IsaMill and graded in a conventional first cleaner and column cell cleaner for
stages two and three.
Overall, the performance copper flotation circuit never stabilized. Copper
recoveries from the feed to bulk concentrate ranged between 73 and 87; however,
the concentrate grades were very low. The concentrates were very high in iron
and sulphur, indicating pyrite as the principle diluent.
The pyrite circuit used Potassium Amyl Xanthate (PAX) as the primary collector.
The collector dosages were high to produce a low sulphur tailing required for the
environmental sample. The PAX dosages were not optimized and it was likely
that PAX was recycled to the copper circuit as part of the tailing water recycle.
Elevated levels of PAX in the recycle would cause activation and flotation of
pyrite in the copper circuit.
-
FIGURE 4PILOT PLANT PRODUCTION OF CONCENTRATE AND TAILINGS
Pilot Plant Composites
Note: a) Detailed test conditions can be found in Appendix V.b) Gold assays are in g/tonne, all others are in percent.
12
Bulk Concentrate Performance – Survey Periods
Feed
PyriteRougher
BulkConcentrate
Cu/MoRougher
1st CleanerTail
Stream pHReagents g/tonne
FO 3418A 208 PAX
Primary Grind 8.3-11.4 9 – 16 - - -
Rougher 10.5-11.2 - 1-10 1-18 -
Regrind 10.5-11.4 9-15 - - -
Cleaners 9.2-11.4 - 1-8 0-17 -
Pyrite Rougher 10.2-10.8 - - - 88-419
Summary of Conditions
PyriteConcentrate
PyriteRougher
Tail
PG RG Cu Mo Au Cu Mo Au
P2 167 21 9.9 0.54 8.7 77 59 66
P2 216 31 16.5 0.53 14.8 73 43 56
P2 180 43 8.8 0.38 9.1 76 53 76
P2 221 129 21.5 0.59 22.5 75 24 62
P3 242 187 10.9 1.11 10.9 84 67 73
P3 253 51 7.5 1.05 9.7 86 75 80
P3 280 60 5.8 0.90 7.1 87 75 75
P3 - - 7.5 1.10 7.7 85 81 64
P4 217 84 8.6 0.90 11 81 30 69
P4 256 65 12.7 1.64 15.9 79 74 64
P4 249 84 4.6 0.50 5.4 83 83 75
P4 300 68 7.4 0.60 7.2 79 75 71
P5 274 64 8.5 0.64 9.9 75 65 66
P5 253 62 10 0.89 12.7 75 61 67
P5 243 56 9.5 1.10 10.7 78 69 71
P5 228 38 4.4 0.69 6.8 81 80 82
Assay - percent of g/tonne Recovery - percentGrind Size mm K80Pilot
Run
-
13
5.0 Copper – Molybdenum Separation
The concentrate from the pilot plant was retreated to remove excess pyrite ahead
of copper-molybdenum testing. This work was reported in pilot runs P6 to P8.
While the concentrate grade improved, the bulk concentrate would be considered
low grade.
Despite the lower concentrate grade, the bulk concentrate from the P6 to P8
campaigns was combined and a single cleaner test was conducted to evaluate the
copper-molybdenum process. Conventional copper depression with Sodium
Hydrosulphide (NaHS) and flotation with nitrogen was conducted. The
flowsheet, reagent conditions and metallurgical balance for the test is displayed in
Figure 5.
As shown, the concentrate produced contained low levels of copper and was high
grade. Molybdenum was 94 percent recovered into a concentrate grading 51
percent molybdenite. This data indicates the molybdenum would respond well to
a conventional molybdenum separation process.
-
FIGURE 5BATCH CLEANER METALLURGICAL PERFORMANCE
Note: Detailed test conditions can be found in Appendix II.
14
Cleaner Test Conditions
MolybdenumConcentrate
BulkCleaner
Tails
CopperConcentrate
Pilot BulkConcentrate
Batch Cleaner Test Performance - Molybdenum
63µm K80
NaHS Fuel Oil MIBC Grind Cond. Float
Feed - - - - - - 8.4 130
Rougher 1 1680 20 - - 10 11 11.2 -580
Regrind - - - 5 - - 8.9 -
Cleaner 1 1400 60 60 - 7 8 10.7 -580
Cleaner 2 1750 20 60 - 3 5 10.6 -575
Cleaner 3 1750 12 60 - 3 3 10.7 -580
Stage pH RedoxTime (minutes)Reagents Added g/tonne
Mass
percent Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Moly Concentrate 3.1 0.39 57.4 0.8 37.9 0.1 94.1 0.1 2.6
Moly 2nd Clnr Tail 0.4 16.80 7.1 25.9 35.8 0.4 1.6 0.3 0.3
Moly 1st Clnr Tail 2.7 17.80 1.2 30.3 38.4 2.9 1.7 2.5 2.3
Moly Ro Concentrate 6.1 9.04 29.7 15.3 38.0 3.5 97.4 2.9 5.3
Copper Concentrate 93.9 16.5 0.05 33.9 44.3 96.5 2.6 97.1 94.7
Feed 100.0 16.0 1.87 32.8 43.9 100 100 100 100
Assay - percent Distribution - percentProduct
-
15
6.0 Quality of the Concentrates
The minor element concentrations of the concentrates were measured with
element specific analyses to increase the accuracy. The results of the analyses are
displayed for the composites tested by locked cycle in Table 2. To have sufficient
sample to assay, cycles IV and V were combined. The following comments may
be relevant when reviewing the table:
- The bulk concentrates for some composites showed elevated levels of
arsenic, lead and zinc. However, none of the levels measured would cause
a significant barrier to marketability.
- Silver levels in the bulk concentrate ranged from 82 to 126 g/tonne. At
these levels, payment of silver might be possible.
- The molybdenum concentrate was relatively free of deleterious elements.
Arsenic, lead and zinc may be elements to reassess when more
molybdenum concentrates become available. Rhenium in the concentrate
was 134 g/tonne. See Appendix IV-Special Data for the Rhenium
Certificate.
- Fluorine assays were not reproducible and therefore not reported.
Additional fluorine assays should be conducted when sample becomes
available.
- The minor element data should be reviewed by a specialist to provide
specific advice on the current concentrate market.
-
16
Aluminum Al % Fusion ICP-OES 0.98 0.89 1.11 1.71
Antimony Sb g/t 2 Acid ICP-OES 200 1000 70 100
Arsenic As g/t 2 Acid ICP-OES 771 977 139 1659
Bismuth Bi g/t 2 Acid ICP-OES 126 120 60 68
Cadmium Cd g/t AR FAAS 70 120 50 30
Calcium Ca % WR ICP-OES 0.38 0.20 0.15 0.06
Carbon C % Leco 0.27 0.22 0.16 4.00
Cobalt Co g/t AR FAAS 110 80 150 10
Copper Cu % Titre 18.6 24.6 17.5 0.39
Fluorine F g/t Fusion ISE 150 ND ND ND
Gold Au g/t FA FAAS 15.6 24.3 13.5 1.85
Iron Fe % AR FAAS 27.0 25.9 24.9 0.8
Lead Pb g/t AR FAAS 400 740 240 240
Magnesium Mg % Fusion ICP-OES 0.16 0.10 0.09
-
17
7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
The testing of three hypogene composites produced very good metallurgical
performance, despite relatively low copper feed grades. On average, copper was
90, 87 and 92 percent recovered into bulk concentrates for the IX, PP and WR
composites, respectively. The concentrate grades were within expected ranges
considering the high levels of molybdenum in the bulk concentrate. The WR
Composite had lower concentrate grade perhaps due to pyrite.
Molybdenum was also well recovered to the bulk concentrate at 78, 79 and 89
percent for the IX, PP and WR Composites, respectively. The high relative grade
of molybdenum to copper in the feed resulted in concentrates containing between
1.5 and 7.5 percent molybdenum in the concentrate. The gold in the feed was 57,
55 and 67 percent recovered to the bulk concentrates for IX, PP and WR
Composites, respectively. These results were in line with previous results.
The metallurgical performance of these fresh drill composites were better than
previously tested hypogene composites constructed of old drill core sample.
Mineralogical assessment of the ground feed samples is recommended. If the
fragmentation properties are similar to previously tested samples performed on
old core, this would increase confidence that these latest results should be
expected when treating fresh ore.
The best metallurgical results (quoted above) were produced with a rougher
regrind flowsheet. The first cleaner concentrate regrind circuit locked cycle tests
produced inferior results; however, the tests were not fully optimized for reagents
in the cleaner circuit. This first cleaner regrind circuit has lower capital and
operating cost and, as previously shown, can provide similar metallurgical results
when fully optimized.
The pilot recessing of the hypogene and supergene composites was completed to
produce tailings sample for environmental testing. This objective was effectively
completed with the addition of a pyrite rougher circuit after the bulk copper-
-
18
molybdenum and gold circuit. Tailings samples of each composite were shipped
to the required third party testing groups.
Unfortunately, there was insufficient sample to stabilize bulk concentrate
production for subsequent copper and molybdenum testing. The concentrate was
consistently contaminated with pyrite, resulting in low concentrate grades.
As per normal plant practice, tailings water in the pilot was recycled to the
primary grinding mill. The addition of a pyrite recovery circuit and reagent
(PAX) to recover pyrite was believed to have been the source of the problem.
In an effort to derive some basic copper-molybdenum separation data, the bulk
concentrate was further cleaned to reject pyrite. This concentrate was combined
tested using a conventional copper-molybdenum separation process. The results
should be used with caution as the bulk concentrate was essentially
unrepresentative due to the additional cleaning stages.
-
APPENDIX I – KM3512
SAMPLE ORIGIN
-
1
1.0 Sample Origin
On July 19, 2012, half drill core intervals from several drill holes were received at
ALS Metallurgy Kamloops for testing. The total weight of the shipment was
approximately 3,524 kg. The drill core was identified by drill hole and sample ID
number. Each sample was weighed; Table I-1 displays the details of the samples
received and their respective weights.
Based on instructions from the client, select intervals were crushed and screened
to 6 mesh in preparation for compositing. Five separate composites were
constructed for testing; three hypogene composites for bench testing and two for
pilot plant testing. The details of the composite construction are displayed in
Table I-2.
Not all of the drill core was used, some intact drill core intervals were retained in
storage.
The hypogene composites used for laboratory testing were homogenized and
rotary split into 2 kg charges for metallurgical testing. The charges were sealed
into plastic bags under nitrogen. These samples were stored frozen until their
subsequent use in the test program. Representative head assays of the composites
are displayed in Table I-3.
The pilot plant samples were crushed and screened to pass 5 mm. The samples
were blended with a mechanical loader using a cone and quartering method. The
samples were stored in plastic totes at ambient temperature prior to processing in
the pilot plant.
A commissioning composite was constructed from old test sample. This material,
approximately 1,353 kg, was used to calibrate the grinding and mass flow rates in
the pilot plant.
-
2
I474982 CAS-088 91.00 92.62 1.62 4.0
I474983 CAS-088 92.62 95.00 2.38 6.3
I474984 CAS-088 95.00 98.00 3.00 7.7
I474985 CAS-088 98.00 101.00 3.00 8.0
I474986 CAS-088 101.00 102.31 1.31 3.7
I474987 CAS-088 102.31 105.00 2.69 6.8
I474988 CAS-088 105.00 108.00 3.00 7.7
I474989 CAS-088 108.00 111.00 3.00 7.8
I474990 CAS-088 111.00 114.00 3.00 7.5
I474991 CAS-088 114.00 117.00 3.00 7.6
I474992 CAS-088 117.00 120.00 3.00 7.8
I474993 CAS-088 120.00 123.00 3.00 7.3
I474994 CAS-088 123.00 125.00 2.00 5.5
I474995 CAS-088 125.00 126.50 1.50 3.2
I474996 CAS-088 126.50 129.00 2.50 6.9
I474997 CAS-088 129.00 132.00 3.00 8.4
I474998 CAS-088 132.00 135.00 3.00 7.8
I474999 CAS-088 135.00 138.00 3.00 7.7
I475000 CAS-088 138.00 141.00 3.00 8.4
I477803 CAS-088 141.00 144.00 3.00 7.2
I477804 CAS-088 144.00 147.00 3.00 9.0
I477805 CAS-088 147.00 150.00 3.00 8.6
I477806 CAS-088 150.00 153.00 3.00 7.0
I477807 CAS-088 153.00 156.00 3.00 8.4
I477808 CAS-088 156.00 159.00 3.00 7.1
I477809 CAS-088 159.00 162.00 3.00 7.9
I477810 CAS-088 162.00 165.00 3.00 7.5
I477811 CAS-088 165.00 168.00 3.00 7.7
I477812 CAS-088 168.00 171.00 3.00 8.1
I477813 CAS-088 171.00 174.00 3.00 8.1
I477814 CAS-088 174.00 177.00 3.00 8.1
I477815 CAS-088 177.00 180.00 3.00 8.1
I477816 CAS-088 180.00 183.00 3.00 7.9
I477817 CAS-088 183.00 186.00 3.00 7.5
I477818 CAS-088 186.00 189.00 3.00 7.5
I477819 CAS-088 189.00 192.00 3.00 8.9
I477820 CAS-088 192.00 195.00 3.00 8.0
I477821 CAS-088 195.00 198.00 3.00 7.8
I477822 CAS-088 198.00 201.00 3.00 7.4
I477823 CAS-088 201.00 204.00 3.00 8.4
I477824 CAS-088 204.00 207.00 3.00 8.2
I477825 CAS-088 207.00 210.00 3.00 8.2
I477826 CAS-088 210.00 213.00 3.00 7.6
HoleSample From To Length Weight
TABLE I-1
MASS AND IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLE RECEIVED
-
3
I477827 CAS-088 213.00 216.00 3.00 7.4
I477828 CAS-088 216.00 219.00 3.00 7.5
I477829 CAS-088 219.00 222.00 3.00 8.1
I477830 CAS-088 222.00 225.00 3.00 7.9
I477831 CAS-088 225.00 228.00 3.00 8.4
I477832 CAS-088 228.00 231.00 3.00 8.2
I477833 CAS-088 231.00 234.00 3.00 8.3
I477834 CAS-088 234.00 237.00 3.00 8.2
I477835 CAS-088 237.00 240.00 3.00 8.6
I477836 CAS-088 240.00 243.00 3.00 8.7
I477837 CAS-088 243.00 246.00 3.00 8.3
I477838 CAS-088 246.00 249.00 3.00 7.0
I477839 CAS-088 249.00 252.00 3.00 8.8
I477840 CAS-088 252.00 255.00 3.00 9.2
I477841 CAS-088 255.00 258.00 3.00 8.1
I477842 CAS-088 258.00 261.00 3.00 7.8
I477843 CAS-088 261.00 264.00 3.00 7.9
I477844 CAS-088 264.00 267.00 3.00 7.5
I477846 CAS-088 270.00 273.00 3.00 8.8
I477847 CAS-088 273.00 276.00 3.00 8.5
I477848 CAS-088 276.00 279.00 3.00 8.2
I477849 CAS-088 279.00 282.00 3.00 8.3
I477850 CAS-088 282.00 285.00 3.00 9.3
I477853 CAS-088 285.00 288.00 3.00 7.9
I477854 CAS-088 288.00 291.00 3.00 9.0
I477855 CAS-088 291.00 294.00 3.00 8.4
I477856 CAS-088 294.00 297.00 3.00 9.0
I477857 CAS-088 297.00 300.00 3.00 7.7
I477858 CAS-088 300.00 303.00 3.00 8.9
I477859 CAS-088 303.00 306.00 3.00 7.6
I477860 CAS-088 306.00 309.00 3.00 7.7
I477861 CAS-088 309.00 311.81 2.81 7.7
I477867 CAS-089 15.00 18.00 3.00 13.7
I477868 CAS-089 18.00 21.00 3.00 13.7
I477869 CAS-089 21.00 24.00 3.00 12.1
I477870 CAS-089 24.00 27.00 3.00 14.9
I477871 CAS-089 27.00 30.00 3.00 13.4
I477872 CAS-089 30.00 33.00 3.00 13.2
I477873 CAS-089 33.00 36.00 3.00 13.8
I477874 CAS-089 36.00 39.00 3.00 13.8
I477875 CAS-089 39.00 42.00 3.00 12.8
I477876 CAS-089 42.00 45.00 3.00 7.5
I477877 CAS-089 45.00 48.00 3.00 8.9
TABLE I-1 Continued
MASS AND IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLE RECEIVED
Sample Hole From To Length Weight
-
4
I477878 CAS-089 48.00 51.00 3.00 8.1
I477879 CAS-089 51.00 54.00 3.00 8.3
I477880 CAS-089 54.00 57.00 3.00 6.6
I477881 CAS-089 57.00 60.00 3.00 9.6
I477882 CAS-089 60.00 63.00 3.00 7.7
I477883 CAS-089 63.00 66.00 3.00 7.0
I477884 CAS-089 66.00 69.00 3.00 7.3
I477885 CAS-089 69.00 72.00 3.00 8.0
I477886 CAS-089 72.00 75.00 3.00 5.0
I477887 CAS-089 75.00 78.00 3.00 8.2
I477888 CAS-089 78.00 81.00 3.00 7.6
I477889 CAS-089 81.00 84.00 3.00 6.8
I477890 CAS-089 84.00 87.00 3.00 7.7
I477891 CAS-089 87.00 90.00 3.00 8.7
I477892 CAS-089 90.00 93.00 3.00 8.1
I477893 CAS-089 93.00 96.00 3.00 8.2
I477894 CAS-089 96.00 99.00 3.00 7.9
I477895 CAS-089 99.00 102.00 3.00 7.4
I477896 CAS-089 102.00 105.00 3.00 7.8
I477897 CAS-089 105.00 108.00 3.00 7.8
I477898 CAS-089 108.00 111.00 3.00 7.8
I477899 CAS-089 111.00 114.00 3.00 9.0
I477900 CAS-089 114.00 117.00 3.00 7.0
I477903 CAS-089 117.00 120.00 3.00 11.4
I477904 CAS-089 120.00 123.00 3.00 6.3
I477905 CAS-089 123.00 126.00 3.00 7.1
I477906 CAS-089 126.00 129.00 3.00 7.9
I477907 CAS-089 129.00 132.00 3.00 7.4
I477908 CAS-089 132.00 135.00 3.00 7.7
I477909 CAS-089 135.00 138.00 3.00 8.8
I477910 CAS-089 138.00 141.00 3.00 8.0
I477911 CAS-089 141.00 144.00 3.00 8.2
I477912 CAS-089 144.00 147.00 3.00 7.5
I477913 CAS-089 147.00 150.00 3.00 8.5
I477914 CAS-089 150.00 153.00 3.00 7.8
I477915 CAS-089 153.00 156.00 3.00 7.4
I477916 CAS-089 156.00 159.00 3.00 8.4
I477917 CAS-089 159.00 162.00 3.00 8.1
I477918 CAS-089 162.00 165.00 3.00 7.9
I477920 CAS-089 168.00 171.00 3.00 8.3
I477921 CAS-089 171.00 174.00 3.00 7.5
I477922 CAS-089 174.00 177.00 3.00 8.2
I477923 CAS-089 177.00 180.00 3.00 8.4
TABLE I-1 Continued
MASS AND IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLE RECEIVED
Sample Hole From To Length Weight
-
5
I477924 CAS-089 180.00 183.00 3.00 7.5
I477925 CAS-089 183.00 186.00 3.00 8.5
I477926 CAS-089 186.00 189.00 3.00 9.1
I477927 CAS-089 189.00 190.50 1.50 3.6
I477928 CAS-089 190.50 193.50 3.00 7.9
I477929 CAS-089 193.50 196.50 3.00 9.0
I477930 CAS-089 196.50 199.50 3.00 7.7
I477931 CAS-089 199.50 202.50 3.00 8.5
I477932 CAS-089 202.50 205.50 3.00 7.8
I477933 CAS-089 205.50 208.50 3.00 8.3
I477934 CAS-089 208.50 211.50 3.00 8.4
I477935 CAS-089 211.50 214.50 3.00 8.1
I477936 CAS-089 214.50 217.50 3.00 8.2
I477937 CAS-089 217.50 220.50 3.00 7.5
I477938 CAS-089 220.50 223.50 3.00 7.9
I477939 CAS-089 223.50 226.50 3.00 8.8
I477940 CAS-089 226.50 229.50 3.00 7.7
I477941 CAS-089 229.50 232.50 3.00 7.4
I477942 CAS-089 232.50 235.50 3.00 9.0
I477943 CAS-089 235.50 238.50 3.00 7.9
I477944 CAS-089 238.50 241.50 3.00 8.9
I477945 CAS-089 241.50 244.50 3.00 8.3
I477946 CAS-089 244.50 246.25 1.75 5.4
I477947 CAS-089 246.25 248.00 1.75 3.9
I477948 CAS-089 248.00 251.00 3.00 8.6
I477949 CAS-089 251.00 254.00 3.00 8.1
I477950 CAS-089 254.00 257.00 3.00 7.9
I477953 CAS-089 257.00 260.00 3.00 7.8
I477954 CAS-089 260.00 263.00 3.00 8.6
I477956 CAS-089 266.00 269.00 3.00 8.2
I477957 CAS-089 269.00 272.00 3.00 7.3
I477958 CAS-089 272.00 275.00 3.00 8.9
I477959 CAS-089 275.00 278.00 3.00 8.3
I477960 CAS-089 278.00 281.00 3.00 9.0
I477961 CAS-089 281.00 284.00 3.00 8.3
I477962 CAS-089 284.00 287.00 3.00 8.0
I477963 CAS-089 287.00 290.00 3.00 8.5
I477964 CAS-089 290.00 293.00 3.00 8.7
I477965 CAS-089 293.00 296.00 3.00 7.6
I477966 CAS-089 296.00 299.00 3.00 8.4
I477967 CAS-089 299.00 302.00 3.00 9.2
I477968 CAS-089 302.00 305.00 3.00 9.0
I477969 CAS-089 305.00 308.00 3.00 8.0
TABLE I-1 Continued
MASS AND IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLE RECEIVED
Sample Hole From To Length Weight
-
6
I477970 CAS-089 308.00 311.00 3.00 8.1
I477971 CAS-089 311.00 314.00 3.00 7.8
I477972 CAS-089 314.00 317.00 3.00 8.5
I477973 CAS-089 317.00 320.00 3.00 8.6
I477974 CAS-089 320.00 323.00 3.00 8.5
I477975 CAS-089 323.00 326.00 3.00 9.1
I477976 CAS-089 326.00 329.00 3.00 9.1
I477977 CAS-089 329.00 330.50 1.50 4.0
I477978 CAS-089 330.50 332.23 1.73 4.9
I477992 CAS-090 40.00 43.00 3.00 7.9
I477995 CAS-090 49.00 52.00 3.00 8.2
I479328 CAS-090 141.10 144.00 2.90 8.0
I479329 CAS-090 144.00 147.00 3.00 8.3
I479330 CAS-090 147.00 150.00 3.00 8.9
I479331 CAS-090 150.00 153.00 3.00 8.9
I479332 CAS-090 153.00 156.00 3.00 13.2
I479333 CAS-090 156.00 159.00 3.00 5.9
I479334 CAS-090 159.00 162.00 3.00 9.2
I479335 CAS-090 162.00 165.00 3.00 8.7
I479336 CAS-090 165.00 168.00 3.00 9.1
I479337 CAS-090 168.00 171.00 3.00 9.5
I479338 CAS-090 171.00 174.00 3.00 6.6
I479339 CAS-090 174.00 177.00 3.00 9.9
I479340 CAS-090 177.00 180.00 3.00 8.5
I479341 CAS-090 180.00 183.00 3.00 9.7
I479342 CAS-090 183.00 186.00 3.00 9.1
I479343 CAS-090 186.00 189.00 3.00 8.6
I479344 CAS-090 189.00 192.00 3.00 9.1
I479345 CAS-090 192.00 195.00 3.00 8.8
I479346 CAS-090 195.00 198.00 3.00 8.4
I479347 CAS-090 198.00 201.00 3.00 8.7
I479348 CAS-090 201.00 204.00 3.00 9.0
I479349 CAS-090 204.00 207.00 3.00 9.2
I479350 CAS-090 207.00 209.00 2.00 5.2
I479353 CAS-090 209.00 212.00 3.00 10.4
I479354 CAS-090 212.00 215.00 3.00 9.5
I479355 CAS-090 215.00 218.00 3.00 8.6
I479356 CAS-090 218.00 221.00 3.00 8.5
I479357 CAS-090 221.00 224.00 3.00 8.7
I479358 CAS-090 224.00 227.00 3.00 8.5
I479359 CAS-090 227.00 230.00 3.00 9.4
I479360 CAS-090 230.00 233.00 3.00 8.3
I479361 CAS-090 233.00 236.00 3.00 9.3
TABLE I-1 Continued
MASS AND IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLE RECEIVED
Sample Hole From To Length Weight
-
7
I479362 CAS-090 236.00 239.00 3.00 8.2
I479363 CAS-090 239.00 242.00 3.00 9.5
I479364 CAS-090 242.00 245.00 3.00 9.1
I479365 CAS-090 245.00 248.00 3.00 8.8
I479366 CAS-090 248.00 250.50 2.50 7.3
I479367 CAS-090 250.50 253.50 3.00 9.4
I479368 CAS-090 253.50 256.50 3.00 9.0
I479369 CAS-090 256.50 259.50 3.00 9.5
I479370 CAS-090 259.50 262.50 3.00 9.6
I479371 CAS-090 262.50 265.50 3.00 9.3
I479372 CAS-090 265.50 268.50 3.00 9.6
I479373 CAS-090 268.50 271.50 3.00 9.2
I479374 CAS-090 271.50 274.50 3.00 8.5
I479375 CAS-090 274.50 276.00 1.50 4.3
I479376 CAS-090 276.00 279.00 3.00 9.5
I479377 CAS-090 279.00 282.00 3.00 8.8
I479378 CAS-090 282.00 285.00 3.00 8.0
I479379 CAS-090 285.00 288.00 3.00 8.5
I479380 CAS-090 288.00 291.00 3.00 9.0
I479381 CAS-090 291.00 294.00 3.00 8.4
I479382 CAS-090 294.00 297.00 3.00 8.9
I479383 CAS-090 297.00 300.00 3.00 9.5
I479384 CAS-090 300.00 303.00 3.00 9.2
I479385 CAS-090 303.00 306.00 3.00 9.5
I479386 CAS-090 306.00 309.00 3.00 8.6
I479387 CAS-090 309.00 312.00 3.00 8.7
I479388 CAS-090 312.00 315.00 3.00 8.5
I479389 CAS-090 315.00 318.00 3.00 9.0
I479390 CAS-090 318.00 321.00 3.00 9.7
I479391 CAS-090 321.00 324.00 3.00 9.3
I479392 CAS-090 324.00 327.00 3.00 9.2
I479393 CAS-090 327.00 330.00 3.00 8.2
I479394 CAS-090 330.00 333.00 3.00 9.5
I479395 CAS-090 333.00 335.28 2.28 6.4
I479429 CAS-091 93.00 96.00 3.00 8.4
I479430 CAS-091 96.00 99.00 3.00 9.3
I479431 CAS-091 99.00 102.00 3.00 8.3
I479432 CAS-091 102.00 105.00 3.00 8.9
I479433 CAS-091 105.00 108.00 3.00 8.4
I479434 CAS-091 108.00 111.00 3.00 8.6
I479435 CAS-091 111.00 114.00 3.00 7.4
I479436 CAS-091 114.00 116.00 2.00 5.6
I479437 CAS-091 116.00 118.00 2.00 6.0
TABLE I-1 Continued
MASS AND IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLE RECEIVED
Sample Hole From To Length Weight
-
8
I479438 CAS-091 118.00 121.00 3.00 8.5
I479439 CAS-091 121.00 124.00 3.00 8.2
I479440 CAS-091 124.00 127.00 3.00 9.4
I479441 CAS-091 127.00 130.00 3.00 9.2
I479442 CAS-091 130.00 133.00 3.00 9.3
I479443 CAS-091 133.00 136.00 3.00 8.8
I479444 CAS-091 136.00 138.00 2.00 5.9
I479445 CAS-091 138.00 141.00 3.00 8.9
I479446 CAS-091 141.00 144.00 3.00 10.2
I479448 CAS-091 144.00 147.00 3.00 9.2
I479449 CAS-091 147.00 150.00 3.00 8.3
I479450 CAS-091 150.00 153.00 3.00 8.6
I479453 CAS-091 153.00 156.00 3.00 8.4
I479454 CAS-091 156.00 159.00 3.00 8.8
I479455 CAS-091 159.00 162.00 3.00 8.9
I479456 CAS-091 162.00 165.00 3.00 8.4
I479457 CAS-091 165.00 168.00 3.00 9.2
I479458 CAS-091 168.00 171.00 3.00 7.9
I479459 CAS-091 171.00 174.00 3.00 8.2
I479460 CAS-091 174.00 177.00 3.00 7.0
I479461 CAS-091 177.00 180.00 3.00 8.4
I479462 CAS-091 180.00 183.00 3.00 8.7
I479463 CAS-091 183.00 186.00 3.00 8.6
I479464 CAS-091 186.00 188.00 2.00 5.0
I479465 CAS-091 188.00 190.00 2.00 6.3
I479466 CAS-091 190.00 193.00 3.00 8.2
I479467 CAS-091 193.00 196.00 3.00 9.3
I479468 CAS-091 196.00 199.00 3.00 8.7
I479469 CAS-091 199.00 202.00 3.00 8.5
I479470 CAS-091 202.00 205.00 3.00 8.6
I479471 CAS-091 205.00 208.00 3.00 9.1
I479472 CAS-091 208.00 211.00 3.00 8.7
I479473 CAS-091 211.00 214.00 3.00 9.3
I479474 CAS-091 214.00 217.00 3.00 8.1
I479475 CAS-091 217.00 220.00 3.00 8.6
I479476 CAS-091 220.00 223.00 3.00 8.5
I479477 CAS-091 223.00 226.00 3.00 8.5
I479478 CAS-091 226.00 229.00 3.00 8.5
I479479 CAS-091 229.00 232.00 3.00 8.4
I479480 CAS-091 232.00 235.00 3.00 9.0
I479481 CAS-091 235.00 238.00 3.00 8.8
I479482 CAS-091 238.00 241.00 3.00 8.8
I479483 CAS-091 241.00 244.00 3.00 9.2
TABLE I-1 Continued
MASS AND IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLE RECEIVED
Sample Hole From To Length Weight
-
9
I479484 CAS-091 244.00 247.00 3.00 8.4
I479485 CAS-091 247.00 250.00 3.00 8.6
I479486 CAS-091 250.00 253.00 3.00 9.0
I479487 CAS-091 253.00 256.00 3.00 8.4
I479488 CAS-091 256.00 259.00 3.00 9.3
I479489 CAS-091 259.00 262.00 3.00 9.0
I479490 CAS-091 262.00 265.00 3.00 9.0
I479491 CAS-091 265.00 268.00 3.00 8.5
I479492 CAS-091 268.00 271.00 3.00 9.0
I479493 CAS-091 271.00 274.00 3.00 8.3
I479494 CAS-091 274.00 277.00 3.00 9.3
I479495 CAS-091 277.00 280.00 3.00 8.6
I479496 CAS-091 280.00 283.00 3.00 9.2
I479497 CAS-091 283.00 286.00 3.00 9.0
I479498 CAS-091 286.00 289.00 3.00 8.5
I479499 CAS-091 289.00 292.00 3.00 9.0
I479500 CAS-091 292.00 295.00 3.00 8.8
I479503 CAS-091 295.00 297.18 2.18 6.6
I479504 CAS-092 5.10 8.10 3.00 12.3
I479505 CAS-092 8.10 11.10 3.00 10.1
I479506 CAS-092 11.10 14.10 3.00 13.7
I479507 CAS-092 14.10 17.10 3.00 14.0
I479508 CAS-092 17.10 19.40 2.30 10.9
I479509 CAS-092 19.40 22.40 3.00 14.1
I479510 CAS-092 22.40 25.40 3.00 14.1
I479511 CAS-092 25.40 28.40 3.00 12.3
I479512 CAS-092 28.40 31.40 3.00 8.5
I479513 CAS-092 31.40 34.40 3.00 8.0
I479514 CAS-092 34.40 37.40 3.00 8.4
I479515 CAS-092 37.40 40.40 3.00 8.7
I479516 CAS-092 40.40 43.30 2.90 8.3
I479517 CAS-092 43.30 46.30 3.00 9.2
I479518 CAS-092 46.30 49.30 3.00 8.2
I479519 CAS-092 49.30 52.30 3.00 9.4
I479520 CAS-092 52.30 53.30 1.00 2.4
I479521 CAS-092 53.30 56.30 3.00 8.5
I479522 CAS-092 56.30 59.30 3.00 7.4
I479523 CAS-092 59.30 62.30 3.00 8.7
I479524 CAS-092 62.30 65.30 3.00 8.8
I479525 CAS-092 65.30 68.30 3.00 8.5
I479526 CAS-092 68.30 71.30 3.00 8.5
I479527 CAS-092 71.30 74.30 3.00 8.2
I479528 CAS-092 74.30 77.30 3.00 9.3
TABLE I-1 Continued
MASS AND IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLE RECEIVED
Sample Hole From To Length Weight
-
10
I479529 CAS-092 77.30 80.30 3.00 8.5
I479530 CAS-092 80.30 83.30 3.00 7.7
I479531 CAS-092 83.30 86.30 3.00 8.2
I479532 CAS-092 86.30 89.30 3.00 8.5
I479533 CAS-092 89.30 92.30 3.00 7.4
I479534 CAS-092 92.30 95.30 3.00 8.0
I479535 CAS-092 95.30 98.30 3.00 8.3
I479536 CAS-092 98.30 101.30 3.00 8.2
I479537 CAS-092 101.30 104.30 3.00 8.3
I479538 CAS-092 104.30 107.30 3.00 9.0
I479539 CAS-092 107.30 110.30 3.00 8.6
i479540 CAS-092 110.30 113.30 3.00 8.6
I479541 CAS-092 113.30 116.30 3.00 8.8
I479542 CAS-092 116.30 119.30 3.00 8.1
I479543 CAS-092 119.30 122.30 3.00 9.4
I479544 CAS-092 122.30 125.30 3.00 7.1
I479545 CAS-092 125.30 128.30 3.00 8.5
I479546 CAS-092 128.30 131.30 3.00 8.1
I479547 CAS-092 131.30 134.30 3.00 8.3
I479548 CAS-092 134.30 137.30 3.00 7.6
I479549 CAS-092 137.30 140.30 3.00 7.8
I479550 CAS-092 140.30 143.30 3.00 7.9
I479553 CAS-092 143.30 146.30 3.00 7.8
I479554 CAS-092 146.30 149.30 3.00 8.9
I479555 CAS-092 149.30 152.30 3.00 7.8
I479556 CAS-092 152.30 155.30 3.00 8.3
I479557 CAS-092 155.30 158.30 3.00 8.6
I479558 CAS-092 158.30 161.30 3.00 8.3
I479559 CAS-092 161.30 164.30 3.00 8.8
I479560 CAS-092 164.30 167.30 3.00 8.5
I479561 CAS-092 167.30 170.30 3.00 9.1
I479562 CAS-092 170.30 173.30 3.00 9.3
I479563 CAS-092 173.30 176.30 3.00 8.5
I479564 CAS-092 176.30 178.00 1.70 5.4
I479565 CAS-092 178.00 181.00 3.00 7.9
I479566 CAS-092 181.00 184.00 3.00 8.4
I479567 CAS-092 184.00 187.00 3.00 8.9
I479568 CAS-092 187.00 190.00 3.00 9.3
I479569 CAS-092 190.00 193.00 3.00 8.8
I479570 CAS-092 193.00 196.00 3.00 8.7
I479571 CAS-092 196.00 199.00 3.00 9.1
I479572 CAS-092 199.00 202.00 3.00 8.8
I479573 CAS-092 202.00 205.00 3.00 10.4
TABLE I-1 Continued
MASS AND IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLE RECEIVED
Sample Hole From To Length Weight
-
11
I479574 CAS-092 205.00 207.00 2.00 4.8
I479575 CAS-092 207.00 210.00 3.00 9.1
I479576 CAS-092 210.00 213.00 3.00 8.2
I479577 CAS-092 213.00 216.00 3.00 9.8
I479578 CAS-092 216.00 219.00 3.00 9.2
I479579 CAS-092 219.00 222.00 3.00 8.6
I479580 CAS-092 222.00 225.00 3.00 8.7
I479581 CAS-092 225.00 228.00 3.00 9.0
I479582 CAS-092 228.00 231.00 3.00 8.6
I479583 CAS-092 231.00 234.00 3.00 9.1
I479584 CAS-092 234.00 237.00 3.00 9.3
I479585 CAS-092 237.00 240.00 3.00 8.7
I479586 CAS-092 240.00 243.00 3.00 9.0
I479587 CAS-092 243.00 246.00 3.00 8.5
I479588 CAS-092 246.00 249.00 3.00 9.5
I479589 CAS-092 249.00 252.00 3.00 9.1
I479590 CAS-092 252.00 255.00 3.00 8.6
I479591 CAS-092 255.00 258.00 3.00 8.0
I479592 CAS-092 258.00 261.00 3.00 9.3
I479593 CAS-092 261.00 264.00 3.00 8.7
I479594 CAS-092 264.00 267.00 3.00 9.1
I479595 CAS-092 267.00 270.00 3.00 9.1
I479596 CAS-092 270.00 273.00 3.00 7.9
I479597 CAS-092 273.00 276.00 3.00 7.6
I479598 CAS-092 276.00 279.00 3.00 9.7
I479599 CAS-092 279.00 282.00 3.00 8.5
I479600 CAS-092 282.00 285.00 3.00 8.9
I479603 CAS-092 285.00 288.00 3.00 9.6
I479604 CAS-092 288.00 291.00 3.00 8.5
I479605 CAS-092 291.00 292.50 1.50 5.2
I479606 CAS-092 292.50 294.13 1.63 5.2
TABLE I-1 Continued
MASS AND IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLE RECEIVED
Sample Hole From To Length Weight
-
12
I477829 CAS-088 219.00 222.00 8.1 Half Core
I477835 CAS-088 237.00 240.00 8.6 Half Core
I477841 CAS-088 255.00 258.00 8.1 Half Core
I477847 CAS-088 273.00 276.00 8.5 Half Core
I477855 CAS-088 291.00 294.00 8.4 Half Core
I477861 CAS-088 309.00 311.81 7.7 Half Core
I479379 CAS-090 285.00 288.00 8.5 Half Core
I479381 CAS-090 291.00 294.00 8.4 Half Core
I479383 CAS-090 297.00 300.00 9.5 Half Core
I479385 CAS-090 303.00 306.00 9.5 Half Core
I479387 CAS-090 309.00 312.00 8.7 Half Core
I479389 CAS-090 315.00 318.00 9.0 Half Core
I479391 CAS-090 321.00 324.00 9.3 Half Core
I479393 CAS-090 327.00 330.00 8.2 Half Core
I479395 CAS-090 333.00 335.28 6.4 Half Core
I479479 CAS-091 229.00 232.00 8.4 Half Core
I479483 CAS-091 241.00 244.00 9.2 Half Core
I479487 CAS-091 253.00 256.00 8.4 Half Core
I479491 CAS-091 265.00 268.00 8.5 Half Core
I479495 CAS-091 277.00 280.00 8.6 Half Core
I479499 CAS-091 289.00 292.00 9.0 Half Core
I479584 CAS-092 234.00 237.00 9.3 Half Core
I479588 CAS-092 246.00 249.00 9.5 Half Core
I479592 CAS-092 258.00 261.00 9.3 Half Core
I479596 CAS-092 270.00 273.00 7.9 Half Core
I479600 CAS-092 282.00 285.00 8.9 Half Core
I479606 CAS-092 292.50 294.13 5.2 Half Core
TABLE I-2B
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
WR Composite
Sample IDWeight
(kg)FormFrom ToHole
TABLE I-2A
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
Sample IDWeight
(kg)Form
IX Composite
From ToHole
-
13
I477957 CAS-089 269.00 272.00 7.3 Half Core
I477959 CAS-089 275.00 278.00 8.3 Half Core
I477962 CAS-089 284.00 287.00 8.0 Half Core
I477964 CAS-089 290.00 293.00 8.7 Half Core
I477966 CAS-089 296.00 299.00 8.4 Half Core
I477968 CAS-089 302.00 305.00 9.0 Half Core
I477970 CAS-089 308.00 311.00 8.1 Half Core
I477972 CAS-089 314.00 317.00 8.5 Half Core
I477974 CAS-089 320.00 323.00 8.5 Half Core
I477976 CAS-089 326.00 329.00 9.1 Half Core
I477978 CAS-089 330.50 332.23 4.9 Half Core
I477805 CAS-088 147.00 150.00 8.6 Half Core
I477806 CAS-088 150.00 153.00 7.0 Half Core
I477807 CAS-088 153.00 156.00 8.4 Half Core
I477808 CAS-088 156.00 159.00 7.1 Half Core
I477809 CAS-088 159.00 162.00 7.9 Half Core
I477810 CAS-088 162.00 165.00 7.5 Half Core
I477811 CAS-088 165.00 168.00 7.7 Half Core
I477812 CAS-088 168.00 171.00 8.1 Half Core
I477813 CAS-088 171.00 174.00 8.1 Half Core
I477814 CAS-088 174.00 177.00 8.1 Half Core
I477815 CAS-088 177.00 180.00 8.1 Half Core
I477816 CAS-088 180.00 183.00 7.9 Half Core
I477817 CAS-088 183.00 186.00 7.5 Half Core
I477818 CAS-088 186.00 189.00 7.5 Half Core
I477819 CAS-088 189.00 192.00 8.9 Half Core
I477820 CAS-088 192.00 195.00 8.0 Half Core
I477821 CAS-088 195.00 198.00 7.8 Half Core
I477822 CAS-088 198.00 201.00 7.4 Half Core
I477823 CAS-088 201.00 204.00 8.4 Half Core
I477824 CAS-088 204.00 207.00 8.2 Half Core
I477825 CAS-088 207.00 210.00 8.2 Half Core
I477826 CAS-088 210.00 213.00 7.6 Half Core
I477827 CAS-088 213.00 216.00 7.4 Half Core
TABLE I-2C
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
PP Composite
Sample IDWeight
(kg)FormFrom ToHole
TABLE I-2D
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
HYP PP Composite
Sample ID Hole From ToWeight
(kg)Form
-
14
I477828 CAS-088 216.00 219.00 7.5 Half Core
I477830 CAS-088 222.00 225.00 7.9 Half Core
I477831 CAS-088 225.00 228.00 8.4 Half Core
I477832 CAS-088 228.00 231.00 8.2 Half Core
I477833 CAS-088 231.00 234.00 8.3 Half Core
I477834 CAS-088 234.00 237.00 8.2 Half Core
I477836 CAS-088 240.00 243.00 8.7 Half Core
I477837 CAS-088 243.00 246.00 8.3 Half Core
I477838 CAS-088 246.00 249.00 7.0 Half Core
I477839 CAS-088 249.00 252.00 8.8 Half Core
I477840 CAS-088 252.00 255.00 9.2 Half Core
I477842 CAS-088 258.00 261.00 7.8 Half Core
I477843 CAS-088 261.00 264.00 7.9 Half Core
I477844 CAS-088 264.00 267.00 7.5 Half Core
I477846 CAS-088 270.00 273.00 8.8 Half Core
I477848 CAS-088 276.00 279.00 8.2 Half Core
I477849 CAS-088 279.00 282.00 8.3 Half Core
I477850 CAS-088 282.00 285.00 9.3 Half Core
I477853 CAS-088 285.00 288.00 7.9 Half Core
I477854 CAS-088 288.00 291.00 9.0 Half Core
I477856 CAS-088 294.00 297.00 9.0 Half Core
I477857 CAS-088 297.00 300.00 7.7 Half Core
I477858 CAS-088 300.00 303.00 8.9 Half Core
I477859 CAS-088 303.00 306.00 7.6 Half Core
I477860 CAS-088 306.00 309.00 7.7 Half Core
I477948 CAS-089 248.00 251.00 8.6 Half Core
I477949 CAS-089 251.00 254.00 8.1 Half Core
I477950 CAS-089 254.00 257.00 7.9 Half Core
I477953 CAS-089 257.00 260.00 7.8 Half Core
I477954 CAS-089 260.00 263.00 8.6 Half Core
I477956 CAS-089 266.00 269.00 8.2 Half Core
I477958 CAS-089 272.00 275.00 8.9 Half Core
I477960 CAS-089 278.00 281.00 9.0 Half Core
I477961 CAS-089 281.00 284.00 8.3 Half Core
I477963 CAS-089 287.00 290.00 8.5 Half Core
I477965 CAS-089 293.00 296.00 7.6 Half Core
I477967 CAS-089 299.00 302.00 9.2 Half Core
I477969 CAS-089 305.00 308.00 8.0 Half Core
I477971 CAS-089 311.00 314.00 7.8 Half Core
I477973 CAS-089 317.00 320.00 8.6 Half Core
I477975 CAS-089 323.00 326.00 9.1 Half Core
I477977 CAS-089 329.00 330.50 4.0 Half Core
TABLE I-2D Continued
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
HYP PP Composite
Sample ID Hole From ToWeight
(kg)Form
-
15
I479376 CAS-090 276.00 279.00 9.5 Half Core
I479377 CAS-090 279.00 282.00 8.8 Half Core
I479378 CAS-090 282.00 285.00 8.0 Half Core
I479380 CAS-090 288.00 291.00 9.0 Half Core
I479382 CAS-090 294.00 297.00 8.9 Half Core
I479384 CAS-090 300.00 303.00 9.2 Half Core
I479386 CAS-090 306.00 309.00 8.6 Half Core
I479388 CAS-090 312.00 315.00 8.5 Half Core
I479390 CAS-090 318.00 321.00 9.7 Half Core
I479392 CAS-090 324.00 327.00 9.2 Half Core
I479394 CAS-090 330.00 333.00 9.5 Half Core
I479465 CAS-091 188.00 190.00 6.3 Half Core
I479466 CAS-091 190.00 193.00 8.2 Half Core
I479467 CAS-091 193.00 196.00 9.3 Half Core
I479468 CAS-091 196.00 199.00 8.7 Half Core
I479469 CAS-091 199.00 202.00 8.5 Half Core
I479470 CAS-091 202.00 205.00 8.6 Half Core
I479471 CAS-091 205.00 208.00 9.1 Half Core
I479472 CAS-091 208.00 211.00 8.7 Half Core
I479473 CAS-091 211.00 214.00 9.3 Half Core
I479474 CAS-091 214.00 217.00 8.1 Half Core
I479475 CAS-091 217.00 220.00 8.6 Half Core
I479476 CAS-091 220.00 223.00 8.5 Half Core
I479477 CAS-091 223.00 226.00 8.5 Half Core
I479478 CAS-091 226.00 229.00 8.5 Half Core
I479480 CAS-091 232.00 235.00 9.0 Half Core
I479481 CAS-091 235.00 238.00 8.8 Half Core
I479482 CAS-091 238.00 241.00 8.8 Half Core
I479484 CAS-091 244.00 247.00 8.4 Half Core
I479485 CAS-091 247.00 250.00 8.6 Half Core
I479486 CAS-091 250.00 253.00 9.0 Half Core
I479488 CAS-091 256.00 259.00 9.3 Half Core
I479489 CAS-091 259.00 262.00 9.0 Half Core
I479490 CAS-091 262.00 265.00 9.0 Half Core
I479492 CAS-091 268.00 271.00 9.0 Half Core
I479493 CAS-091 271.00 274.00 8.3 Half Core
I479494 CAS-091 274.00 277.00 9.3 Half Core
I479496 CAS-091 280.00 283.00 9.2 Half Core
I479497 CAS-091 283.00 286.00 9.0 Half Core
I479498 CAS-091 286.00 289.00 8.5 Half Core
I479500 CAS-091 292.00 295.00 8.8 Half Core
I479503 CAS-091 295.00 297.18 6.6 Half Core
TABLE I-2D Continued
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
HYP PP Composite
Sample ID Hole From ToWeight
(kg)Form
-
16
I479565 CAS-092 178.00 181.00 7.9 Half Core
I479566 CAS-092 181.00 184.00 8.4 Half Core
I479567 CAS-092 184.00 187.00 8.9 Half Core
I479568 CAS-092 187.00 190.00 9.3 Half Core
I479569 CAS-092 190.00 193.00 8.8 Half Core
I479570 CAS-092 193.00 196.00 8.7 Half Core
I479571 CAS-092 196.00 199.00 9.1 Half Core
I479572 CAS-092 199.00 202.00 8.8 Half Core
I479573 CAS-092 202.00 205.00 10.4 Half Core
I479574 CAS-092 205.00 207.00 4.8 Half Core
I479575 CAS-092 207.00 210.00 9.1 Half Core
I479576 CAS-092 210.00 213.00 8.2 Half Core
I479577 CAS-092 213.00 216.00 9.8 Half Core
I479578 CAS-092 216.00 219.00 9.2 Half Core
I479579 CAS-092 219.00 222.00 8.6 Half Core
I479580 CAS-092 222.00 225.00 8.7 Half Core
I479581 CAS-092 225.00 228.00 9.0 Half Core
I479582 CAS-092 228.00 231.00 8.6 Half Core
I479583 CAS-092 231.00 234.00 9.1 Half Core
I479585 CAS-092 237.00 240.00 8.7 Half Core
I479586 CAS-092 240.00 243.00 9.0 Half Core
I479587 CAS-092 243.00 246.00 8.5 Half Core
I479589 CAS-092 249.00 252.00 9.1 Half Core
I479590 CAS-092 252.00 255.00 8.6 Half Core
I479591 CAS-092 255.00 258.00 8.0 Half Core
I479593 CAS-092 261.00 264.00 8.7 Half Core
I479594 CAS-092 264.00 267.00 9.1 Half Core
I479595 CAS-092 267.00 270.00 9.1 Half Core
I479597 CAS-092 273.00 276.00 7.6 Half Core
I479598 CAS-092 276.00 279.00 9.7 Half Core
I479599 CAS-092 279.00 282.00 8.5 Half Core
I479603 CAS-092 285.00 288.00 9.6 Half Core
I479604 CAS-092 288.00 291.00 8.5 Half Core
I479605 CAS-092 291.00 292.50 5.2 Half Core
TABLE I-2D Continued
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
HYP PP Composite
Sample ID Hole From ToWeight
(kg)Form
-
17
I474992 CAS-088 117.00 120.00 7.8 Half Core
I474993 CAS-088 120.00 123.00 7.3 Half Core
I474994 CAS-088 123.00 125.00 5.5 Half Core
I474996 CAS-088 126.50 129.00 6.9 Half Core
I474997 CAS-088 129.00 132.00 8.4 Half Core
I474998 CAS-088 132.00 135.00 7.8 Half Core
I475000 CAS-088 138.00 141.00 8.4 Half Core
I477803 CAS-088 141.00 144.00 7.2 Half Core
I477804 CAS-088 144.00 147.00 9.0 Half Core
I477927 CAS-089 189.00 190.50 3.6 Half Core
I477928 CAS-089 190.50 193.50 7.9 Half Core
I477929 CAS-089 193.50 196.50 9.0 Half Core
I477931 CAS-089 199.50 202.50 8.5 Half Core
I477932 CAS-089 202.50 205.50 7.8 Half Core
I477933 CAS-089 205.50 208.50 8.3 Half Core
I477935 CAS-089 211.50 214.50 8.1 Half Core
I477936 CAS-089 214.50 217.50 8.2 Half Core
I477937 CAS-089 217.50 220.50 7.5 Half Core
I477939 CAS-089 223.50 226.50 8.8 Half Core
I477940 CAS-089 226.50 229.50 7.7 Half Core
I477941 CAS-089 229.50 232.50 7.4 Half Core
I477943 CAS-089 235.50 238.50 7.9 Half Core
I477944 CAS-089 238.50 241.50 8.9 Half Core
I477945 CAS-089 241.50 244.50 8.3 Half Core
I477946 CAS-089 244.50 246.25 5.4 Half Core
I477947 CAS-089 246.25 248.00 3.9 Half Core
I479328 CAS-090 141.10 144.00 8.0 Half Core
I479329 CAS-090 144.00 147.00 8.3 Half Core
I479330 CAS-090 147.00 150.00 8.9 Half Core
I479331 CAS-090 150.00 153.00 8.9 Half Core
I479332 CAS-090 153.00 156.00 13.2 Half Core
I479333 CAS-090 156.00 159.00 5.9 Half Core
I479335 CAS-090 162.00 165.00 8.7 Half Core
I479336 CAS-090 165.00 168.00 9.1 Half Core
I479337 CAS-090 168.00 171.00 9.5 Half Core
I479338 CAS-090 171.00 174.00 6.6 Half Core
I479339 CAS-090 174.00 177.00 9.9 Half Core
I479340 CAS-090 177.00 180.00 8.5 Half Core
I479341 CAS-090 180.00 183.00 9.7 Half Core
I479342 CAS-090 183.00 186.00 9.1 Half Core
I479343 CAS-090 186.00 189.00 8.6 Half Core
I479344 CAS-090 189.00 192.00 9.1 Half Core
TABLE I-2E
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
SUS PP Composite
Sample ID Hole From ToWeight
(kg)Form
-
18
I479345 CAS-090 192.00 195.00 8.8 Half Core
I479347 CAS-090 198.00 201.00 8.7 Half Core
I479348 CAS-090 201.00 204.00 9.0 Half Core
I479349 CAS-090 204.00 207.00 9.2 Half Core
I479350 CAS-090 207.00 209.00 5.2 Half Core
I479353 CAS-090 209.00 212.00 10.4 Half Core
I479354 CAS-090 212.00 215.00 9.5 Half Core
I479355 CAS-090 215.00 218.00 8.6 Half Core
I479356 CAS-090 218.00 221.00 8.5 Half Core
I479357 CAS-090 221.00 224.00 8.7 Half Core
I479358 CAS-090 224.00 227.00 8.5 Half Core
I479359 CAS-090 227.00 230.00 9.4 Half Core
I479360 CAS-090 230.00 233.00 8.3 Half Core
I479361 CAS-090 233.00 236.00 9.3 Half Core
I479362 CAS-090 236.00 239.00 8.2 Half Core
I479363 CAS-090 239.00 242.00 9.5 Half Core
I479364 CAS-090 242.00 245.00 9.1 Half Core
I479365 CAS-090 245.00 248.00 8.8 Half Core
I479367 CAS-090 250.50 253.50 9.4 Half Core
I479368 CAS-090 253.50 256.50 9.0 Half Core
I479369 CAS-090 256.50 259.50 9.5 Half Core
I479370 CAS-090 259.50 262.50 9.6 Half Core
I479371 CAS-090 262.50 265.50 9.3 Half Core
I479372 CAS-090 265.50 268.50 9.6 Half Core
I479373 CAS-090 268.50 271.50 9.2 Half Core
I479374 CAS-090 271.50 274.50 8.5 Half Core
I479375 CAS-090 274.50 276.00 4.3 Half Core
I479435 CAS-091 111.00 114.00 7.4 Half Core
I479436 CAS-091 114.00 116.00 5.6 Half Core
I479437 CAS-091 116.00 118.00 6.0 Half Core
I479438 CAS-091 118.00 121.00 8.5 Half Core
I479439 CAS-091 121.00 124.00 8.2 Half Core
I479440 CAS-091 124.00 127.00 9.4 Half Core
I479441 CAS-091 127.00 130.00 9.2 Half Core
I479442 CAS-091 130.00 133.00 9.3 Half Core
I479443 CAS-091 133.00 136.00 8.8 Half Core
I479444 CAS-091 136.00 138.00 5.9 Half Core
I479445 CAS-091 138.00 141.00 8.9 Half Core
I479446 CAS-091 141.00 144.00 10.2 Half Core
I479448 CAS-091 144.00 147.00 9.2 Half Core
I479450 CAS-091 150.00 153.00 8.6 Half Core
I479453 CAS-091 153.00 156.00 8.4 Half Core
TABLE I-2E Continued
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
SUS PP Composite
Sample ID Hole From ToWeight
(kg)Form
-
19
I479454 CAS-091 156.00 159.00 8.8 Half Core
I479455 CAS-091 159.00 162.00 8.9 Half Core
I479456 CAS-091 162.00 165.00 8.4 Half Core
I479457 CAS-091 165.00 168.00 9.2 Half Core
I479458 CAS-091 168.00 171.00 7.9 Half Core
I479459 CAS-091 171.00 174.00 8.2 Half Core
I479460 CAS-091 174.00 177.00 7.0 Half Core
I479461 CAS-091 177.00 180.00 8.4 Half Core
I479462 CAS-091 180.00 183.00 8.7 Half Core
I479463 CAS-091 183.00 186.00 8.6 Half Core
I479517 CAS-092 43.30 46.30 9.2 Half Core
I479518 CAS-092 46.30 49.30 8.2 Half Core
I479519 CAS-092 49.30 52.30 9.4 Half Core
I479520 CAS-092 52.30 53.30 2.4 Half Core
I479521 CAS-092 53.30 56.30 8.5 Half Core
I479522 CAS-092 56.30 59.30 7.4 Half Core
I479523 CAS-092 59.30 62.30 8.7 Half Core
I479524 CAS-092 62.30 65.30 8.8 Half Core
I479525 CAS-092 65.30 68.30 8.5 Half Core
I479526 CAS-092 68.30 71.30 8.5 Half Core
I479527 CAS-092 71.30 74.30 8.2 Half Core
I479528 CAS-092 74.30 77.30 9.3 Half Core
I479530 CAS-092 80.30 83.30 7.7 Half Core
I479531 CAS-092 83.30 86.30 8.2 Half Core
I479532 CAS-092 86.30 89.30 8.5 Half Core
I479533 CAS-092 89.30 92.30 7.4 Half Core
I479534 CAS-092 92.30 95.30 8.0 Half Core
I479535 CAS-092 95.30 98.30 8.3 Half Core
I479536 CAS-092 98.30 101.30 8.2 Half Core
I479537 CAS-092 101.30 104.30 8.3 Half Core
I479538 CAS-092 104.30 107.30 9.0 Half Core
I479539 CAS-092 107.30 110.30 8.6 Half Core
i479540 CAS-092 110.30 113.30 8.6 Half Core
I479541 CAS-092 113.30 116.30 8.8 Half Core
I479543 CAS-092 119.30 122.30 9.4 Half Core
I479544 CAS-092 122.30 125.30 7.1 Half Core
I479545 CAS-092 125.30 128.30 8.5 Half Core
I479546 CAS-092 128.30 131.30 8.1 Half Core
I479547 CAS-092 131.30 134.30 8.3 Half Core
I479548 CAS-092 134.30 137.30 7.6 Half Core
I479549 CAS-092 137.30 140.30 7.8 Half Core
I479550 CAS-092 140.30 143.30 7.9 Half Core
TABLE I-2E Continued
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
SUS PP Composite
Sample ID Hole From ToWeight
(kg)Form
-
20
I479553 CAS-092 143.30 146.30 7.8 Half Core
I479554 CAS-092 146.30 149.30 8.9 Half Core
I479555 CAS-092 149.30 152.30 7.8 Half Core
I479556 CAS-092 152.30 155.30 8.3 Half Core
I479558 CAS-092 158.30 161.30 8.3 Half Core
I479559 CAS-092 161.30 164.30 8.8 Half Core
I479560 CAS-092 164.30 167.30 8.5 Half Core
I479561 CAS-092 167.30 170.30 9.1 Half Core
I479562 CAS-092 170.30 173.30 9.3 Half Core
I479563 CAS-092 173.30 176.30 8.5 Half Core
I479564 CAS-092 176.30 178.00 5.4 Half Core
TABLE I-2E Continued
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
SUS PP Composite
Sample ID Hole From ToWeight
(kg)Form
-
21
Cu Mo Fe Au CuOx CuCN S C Ag
PP Composite 0.14 0.030 2.95 0.22 0.004 0.008 0.74 0.45 1
IX Composite 0.17 0.071 2.39 0.22 0.006 0.012 2.06 0.31 2
WR Composite 0.19 0.019 2.50 0.18 0.005 0.013 2.46 0.16 1
HYP PP Composite 0.21 0.032 2.52 0.35 0.01 0.018 2.19 0.19 1
SUS PP Composite 0.29 0.028 4.01 0.38 0.027 0.093 3.22 0.18 1
Assay - percent or g/tonneSample
TABLE I-3
REPLICATE HEAD ASSAY DATA
-
APPENDIX II – KM3512
FLOTATION TEST DATA
-
INDEX
TEST PAGE
1 Rougher Test – PP Composite.............................................................................1
2 Rougher Test – WR Composite...........................................................................3
3 Rougher Test – PP Composite.............................................................................5
4 Rougher Test – WR Composite...........................................................................7
5 Rougher Test – IX Composite.............................................................................9
6 Rougher Test – WR Composite.........................................................................11
7 Rougher Test – WR Composite.........................................................................13
8 Rougher Test – IX Composite...........................................................................15
9 Rougher Test – IX Composite...........................................................................17
10 Rougher Test – PP Composite...........................................................................19
11 Rougher Test – PP Composite...........................................................................21
12 Cleaner Test – WR Composite..........................................................................23
13 Cleaner Test – IX Composite ............................................................................25
14 Cleaner Test – PP Composite............................................................................27
15 Cleaner Test – WR Composite..........................................................................29
16 Cleaner Test – IX Composite ............................................................................31
17 Cleaner Test – PP Composite............................................................................33
18 Locked Cycle Test – PP Composite ..................................................................35
19 Locked Cycle Test – WR Composite ................................................................40
20 Locked Cycle Test – IX Composite ..................................................................45
21 Cleaner Test – IX Composite ............................................................................50
22 Cleaner Test – IX Composite ............................................................................52
23 Locked Cycle Test – IX Composite ..................................................................54
24 Locked Cycle Test – PP Composite ..................................................................59
25 Locked Cycle Test – WR Composite ................................................................64
26 Rougher Test – IX Composite...........................................................................69
27 Rougher Test – IX Composite...........................................................................71
28 Rougher Test – PP Composite...........................................................................73
29 Cleaner Test – P6 to P8 Cleaner Concentrate ...................................................75
-
1
DATE:
PROJECT NO: KM3512-01
PURPOSE: Preliminary Rougher Test.
PROCEDURE: Perform a standard one product rougher test.
FEED: 2 kg of PP Composite ore ground to a nominal 178mm K80.
FLOWSHEET: 1
Reagents Added g/tonne Time (minutes) pH
Lime Fuel Oil 3418A 208 MIBC Grind Cond. Float
Primary Grind 2000 10 11 11.1
BULK CIRCUIT:
Rougher 1 - 2 4 8 1 2 11.0Rougher 2 √ 2 4 - 1 2 11.0Rougher 3 √ 2 4 - 1 2 11.0Rougher 4 √ 1 2 8 1 3 11.0
Flotation Data RougherFlotation Machine: D2A Mill:Cell Size in liters: 4.4 Charge/Material:Aspiration: Water:
Water Type:Impeller Speed in rpm: 1100
August 28, 2012
Stage
Fresh
Air
Grinding Data Primary GrindM3-Mild
20kg-Mild1000 ml
-
2
KM3512-01 PP CompositeOverall Metallurgical Balance
Product Weight Assay - percent or g/t Distribution - percent
% grams Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Bulk Ro Con 1 1.7 32.9 6.90 1.099 10.2 11.00 79.1 65.1 5.7 24.6
Bulk Ro Con 2 1.4 27.5 0.57 0.157 4.3 2.55 5.5 7.8 2.0 4.8
Bulk Ro Con 3 1.5 30.5 0.19 0.031 3.2 1.21 2.0 1.7 1.7 2.5
Bulk Ro Con 4 2.7 54.2 0.06 0.011 3.0 0.60 1.2 1.1 2.8 2.2
Bulk RoTl 92.7 1837.3 0.02 0.007 2.8 0.53 12.2 24.3 87.8 65.9
Feed 100.0 1982 0.14 0.028 3.0 0.74 100 100 100 100
KM3512-01 PP CompositeCumulative Metallurgical Balance
Cumulative Cum. Weight Assay - percent or g/t Distribution - percent
Product % grams Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Product 1 1.7 32.9 6.90 1.099 10.2 11.00 79.1 65.1 5.7 24.6
Product 1 to 2 3.0 60.4 4.02 0.670 7.5 7.15 84.6 72.9 7.7 29.4
Product 1 to 3 4.6 90.9 2.73 0.456 6.1 5.16 86.6 74.6 9.4 31.9
Product 1 to 4 7.3 145.1 1.74 0.290 4.9 3.46 87.8 75.7 12.2 34.1
Product 5 92.7 1837.3 0.02 0.007 2.8 0.53 12.2 24.3 87.8 65.9
Feed 100.0 1982 0.14 0.028 3.0 0.74 100 100 100 100
-
3
DATE:
PROJECT NO: KM3512-02
PURPOSE: Preliminary Rougher Test.
PROCEDURE: Perform a standard one product rougher test.
FEED: 2 kg of WR Composite ore ground to a nominal 178mm K80.
FLOWSHEET: 1
Reagents Added g/tonne Time (minutes) pH
Lime Fuel Oil 3418A 208 MIBC Grind Cond. Float
Primary Grind 2000 10 13 10.5
BULK CIRCUIT:
Rougher 1 1000 2 4 8 1 2 11.0Rougher 2 √ 2 4 - 1 2 11.0Rougher 3 - 1 2 8 1 2 11.0Rougher 4 - 1 2 - 1 2 11.0
Flotation Data RougherFlotation Machine: D2A Mill:Cell Size in liters: 4.4 Charge/Material:Aspiration: Water:
Water Type:Impeller Speed in rpm: 1100
Air 1000 ml
Fresh
August 28, 2012
Stage
Grinding Data Primary GrindM3-Mild
20kg-Mild
-
4
KM3512-02 WR CompositeOverall Metallurgical Balance
Product Weight Assay - percent or g/t Distribution - percent
% grams Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Bulk Ro Con 1 1.8 35.4 9.70 0.807 15.7 19.10 89.2 76.2 11.2 14.1
Bulk Ro Con 2 1.1 22.1 0.54 0.079 9.9 8.41 3.1 4.7 4.4 3.9
Bulk Ro Con 3 1.2 23.1 0.19 0.020 4.5 4.46 1.1 1.3 2.1 2.2
Bulk Ro Con 4 1.3 26.6 0.09 0.013 2.4 2.30 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.3
Bulk RoTl 94.6 1887.5 0.01 0.003 2.1 1.99 5.9 17.0 81.1 78.5
Feed 100.0 1995 0.19 0.019 2.5 2.40 100 100 100 100
KM3512-02 WR CompositeCumulative Metallurgical Balance
Cumulative Cum. Weight Assay - percent or g/t Distribution - percent
Product % grams Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Product 1 1.8 35.4 9.70 0.807 15.7 19.10 89.2 76.2 11.2 14.1
Product 1 to 2 2.9 57.5 6.18 0.527 13.5 14.99 92.3 80.9 15.5 18.0
Product 1 to 3 4.0 80.6 4.46 0.382 10.9 11.97 93.5 82.1 17.6 20.2
Product 1 to 4 5.4 107.2 3.38 0.290 8.8 9.57 94.1 83.0 18.9 21.5
Product 5 94.6 1887.5 0.01 0.003 2.1 1.99 5.9 17.0 81.1 78.5
Feed 100.0 1995 0.19 0.019 2.5 2.40 100 100 100 100
-
5
DATE:
PROJECT NO: KM3512-03
PURPOSE: To Repeat Test 1 at a pH of 9.5.
PROCEDURE: Perform a standard one product rougher test.
FEED: 2 kg of PP Composite ore ground to a nominal 178mm K80.
FLOWSHEET: 1
Reagents Added g/tonne Time (minutes) pH
Lime Fuel Oil 3418A 208 MIBC Grind Cond. Float
Primary Grind 800 10 11 10.4
BULK CIRCUIT:
Rougher 1 - 2 4 23 1 2 9.8Rougher 2 - 2 4 - 1 2 9.6Rougher 3 - 2 4 - 1 2 9.5Rougher 4 √ 1 2 - 1 3 9.8
Flotation Data RougherFlotation Machine: D2A Mill:Cell Size in liters: 4.4 Charge/Material:Aspiration: Water:
Water Type:Impeller Speed in rpm: 1100
Air 1000 ml
Fresh
August 30, 2012
Stage
Grinding Data Primary GrindM3-Mild
20kg-Mild
-
6
KM3512-03 PP CompositeOverall Metallurgical Balance
Product Weight Assay - percent or g/t Distribution - percent
% grams Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Bulk Ro Con 1 2.2 44.3 4.00 0.93 10.3 13.0 74.1 76.3 7.6 38.3
Bulk Ro Con 2 1.6 31.9 0.69 0.06 11.1 11.2 9.2 3.6 5.9 23.8
Bulk Ro Con 3 1.5 30.1 0.21 0.02 7.2 5.48 2.6 0.9 3.6 11.0
Bulk Ro Con 4 1.8 36.2 0.16 0.009 4.4 1.73 2.4 0.6 2.6 4.2
Bulk RoTl 92.8 1846.8 0.02 0.005 2.6 0.19 11.6 18.5 80.2 22.7
Feed 100.0 1989 0.12 0.027 3.0 0.76 100 100 100 100
KM3512-03 PP CompositeCumulative Metallurgical Balance
Cumulative Cum. Weight Assay - percent or g/t Distribution - percent
Product % grams Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Product 1 2.2 44.3 4.00 0.93 10.3 13.0 74.1 76.3 7.6 38.3
Product 1 to 2 3.8 76.2 2.61 0.57 10.6 12.2 83.3 79.9 13.5 62.1
Product 1 to 3 5.3 106.3 1.93 0.41 9.7 10.3 86.0 80.8 17.2 73.1
Product 1 to 4 7.2 142.5 1.48 0.31 8.3 8.15 88.4 81.5 19.8 77.3
Product 5 92.8 1846.8 0.02 0.005 2.6 0.19 11.6 18.5 80.2 22.7
Feed 100.0 1989 0.12 0.03 3.0 0.76 100 100 100 100
-
7
DATE:
PROJECT NO: KM3512-04
PURPOSE: To Repeat Test 2 at a pH of 9.5.
PROCEDURE: Perform a standard one product rougher test.
FEED: 2 kg of WR Composite ore ground to a nominal 178mm K80.
FLOWSHEET: 1
Reagents Added g/tonne Time (minutes) pH
Lime Fuel Oil 3418A 208 MIBC Grind Cond. Float
Primary Grind 600 10 13 9.5
BULK CIRCUIT:
Rougher 1 25 2 4 15 1 2 9.5Rougher 2 √ 2 4 8 1 2 9.5Rougher 3 - 1 2 - 1 2 9.5Rougher 4 - 1 2 - 1 2 9.5
Flotation Data RougherFlotation Machine: D2A Mill:Cell Size in liters: 4.4 Charge/Material:Aspiration: Water:
Water Type:Impeller Speed in rpm: 1100
Air 1000 ml
Fresh
August 30, 2012
Stage
Grinding Data Primary GrindM3-Mild
20kg-Mild
-
8
KM3512-04 WR CompositeOverall Metallurgical Balance
Product Weight Assay - percent or g/t Distribution - percent
% grams Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Bulk Ro Con 1 5.9 118.5 3.11 0.30 25.2 36.3 93.0 88.5 58.8 80.5
Bulk Ro Con 2 1.2 23.1 0.30 0.02 12.2 12.6 1.7 1.2 5.6 5.4
Bulk Ro Con 3 0.7 14.5 0.19 0.01 12.0 14.0 0.7 0.4 3.4 3.8
Bulk Ro Con 4 0.5 10.3 0.15 0.009 11.4 12.6 0.4 0.2 2.3 2.4
Bulk RoTl 91.7 1826.9 0.01 0.002 0.8 0.23 4.1 9.6 29.9 7.8
Feed 100.0 1993 0.20 0.020 2.5 2.68 100 100 100 100
KM3512-04 WR CompositeCumulative Metallurgical Balance
Cumulative Cum. Weight Assay - percent or g/t Distribution - percent
Product % grams Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Product 1 5.9 118.5 3.11 0.30 25.2 36.3 93.0 88.5 58.8 80.5
Product 1 to 2 7.1 141.6 2.65 0.25 23.1 32.4 94.8 89.8 64.4 85.9
Product 1 to 3 7.8 156.1 2.42 0.23 22.1 30.7 95.5 90.2 67.8 89.7
Product 1 to 4 8.3 166.4 2.28 0.21 21.4 29.6 95.9 90.4 70.1 92.2
Product 5 91.7 1826.9 0.01 0.002 0.8 0.23 4.1 9.6 29.9 7.8
Feed 100.0 1993 0.20 0.02 2.5 2.68 100 100 100 100
-
9
DATE:
PROJECT NO: KM3512-05
PURPOSE: Preliminary Rougher Test.
PROCEDURE: Perform a standard one product rougher test.
FEED: 2 kg of IX Composite ore ground to a nominal 155mm K80.
FLOWSHEET: 1
Reagents Added g/tonne Time (minutes) pH
Lime Fuel Oil 3418A 208 MIBC Grind Cond. Float
Primary Grind 2000 10 14.5 11.4
BULK CIRCUIT:
Rougher 1 - 3 6 15 1 2 11.0Rougher 2 - 2 4 - 1 2 11.0Rougher 3 - 1 2 - 1 2 11.0Rougher 4 √ 20 40 - 1 2 11.0
Flotation Data RougherFlotation Machine: D2A Mill:Cell Size in liters: 4.4 Charge/Material:Aspiration: Water:
Water Type:Impeller Speed in rpm: 1100
Air 1000 ml
Fresh
August 30, 2012
Stage
Grinding Data Primary GrindM3-Mild
20kg-Mild
-
10
KM3512-05 IX CompositeOverall Metallurgical Balance
Product Weight Assay - percent or g/t Distribution - percent
% grams Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Bulk Ro Con 1 1.6 31.3 9.54 3.06 19.8 23.7 89.9 68.8 13.4 19.4
Bulk Ro Con 2 0.8 15.4 0.55 0.47 16.9 16.8 2.6 5.2 5.6 6.8
Bulk Ro Con 3 0.6 11.2 0.26 0.15 18.1 21.8 0.9 1.2 4.4 6.4
Bulk Ro Con 4 2.7 52.8 0.10 0.04 19.4 23.9 1.6 1.4 22.1 33.0
Bulk RoTl 94.4 1871.3 0.01 0.02 1.4 0.71 5.1 23.4 54.5 34.5
Feed 100.0 1982 0.17 0.070 2.3 1.93 100 100 100 100
KM3512-05 IX CompositeCumulative Metallurgical Balance
Cumulative Cum. Weight Assay - percent or g/t Distribution - percent
Product % grams Cu Mo Fe S Cu Mo Fe S
Product 1 1.6 31.3 9.54 3.06 19.8 23.7 89.9 68.8 13.4 19.4
Product 1 to 2 2.4 46.7 6.58 2.21 18.8 21.4 92.5 74.1 19.0 26.1
Product 1 to 3 2.9 57.9 5.35 1.81 18.7 21.5 93.3 75.2 23.4 32.5
Product 1 to 4 5.6 110.7 2.85 0.96 19.0 22.6 94.9 76.6 45.5 65.5
Product 5 94.4 1871.3 0.01 0.02 1.4 0.71 5.1 23.4 54.5 34.5
Feed 100.0 1982 0.17 0.07 2.3 1.93 100 100 100 100
-
11
DATE:
PROJECT NO: KM3512-06
PURPOSE: To Repeat Test 4 at a Coarser Primary Grind.
PROCEDURE: Perform a standard one product rougher test.
FEED: 2 kg of WR Composite ore ground to a nominal 211mm K80.
FLOWSHEET: 1
Reagents Added g/tonne Time (minutes) pH
Lime Fuel Oil 3418A 208 MIBC Grind Cond. Float
Primary Grind 600 10 11.5 9.4
BULK CIRCUIT:
Rougher 1 25 2 4 23 1 2 9.5Rougher 2 √ 2 4 - 1 2 9.5Rougher 3 √ 1 2 - 1 2 9.5Rougher 4 √ 1 2 - 1 2 9.5
Flotation Data RougherFlotation Machine: D2A Mill:Cell Size in liters: 4.4 Charge/Material:Aspiration: Water:
Water Type:Impeller Speed in rpm: 1100
Air 1000 ml
Fresh
Stage
Grinding Data Primary GrindM3-Mild
20kg-Mild
September 5, 2012
-
12
KM351