PREDICTIVE SAFETY MODEL IN CLINICAL TRIALS A …...- ECG Test or Examination: (QTC FRIDERICIA) Vital...
Transcript of PREDICTIVE SAFETY MODEL IN CLINICAL TRIALS A …...- ECG Test or Examination: (QTC FRIDERICIA) Vital...
PREDICTIVE SAFETY MODEL IN CLINICAL TRIALS – A SPOTFIRE CASE STUDY
Prem Narasimhan
Bristol Myers Squibb
Introduction • Current Environment
• Shifting through large volumes of data and glean knowledge from heterogeneous/multidimensional datasets, especially static and silo-ed.
• What are the Needs
• Need for interactive data visualization tools to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their data review process.
• TIBCO Spotfire® value proposition for BMS
• Dynamic, interactive and capable of 360 degree data review. • Efficient identification of trends, patterns, and outliers and then seamlessly
engage in further exploration. • Spotfire has the ability to improve: the quality of data, the efficiency and
effectiveness of data review, the depth of understanding of the data and, most importantly, the safety of study patients.
Drug Development Process
Ph I: Healthy Volunteers to Determine Safety & Dose Ph II: Patient Volunteers to Efficacy & Side effects
Ph III: Used to Monitor Adverse Reactions to Long-Term use
Ph IV: Safety Surveillance
IND NDA
Drug Development Life Cycle
Objective
To characterize normal individuals safety parameter variability in Normal Healthy Volunteers (NHV) taking placebo in Phase-I clinical trials.
Current knowledge on NHV
1. Currently there are very few published studies of NHV receiving placebo from which to provide estimates of the variability of safety parameters.
2. Data to aid decision-making in early phase trials are limited. 3. Selected safety findings from early phase studies in NHV may
result in delay or termination. 4. Integrated 25 First-in-human (SAD/MAD) NHV placebo.
Questions addressed by the analysis?
What is the probability of selected safety events based on?
• Pre-determined criteria.
• Pre-treatment rates of selected safety events.
• Exposure-adjusted incidence rates.
What added to our knowledge?
• In an integrated analysis of NHV assigned to placebo, there were no safety concerns involving DILIs, ECGs, or SAEs/Deaths.
• Abnormalities in DBP were as noted
Future impact on clinical pharmacology and therapeutics? • Findings could help inform the evaluation of safety findings in future HNV
studies. • The inclusion and exclusion criteria for future studies in NHVs should be
carefully re-examined.
• Helps in analyzing safety parameters within a selected population of interest.
Home-Normal Health Volunteers
Demo NHV Spotfire Build
Studies included Normal Health Volunteers
Patient List of Normal Health Volunteers
Demographics of Normal Health Volunteers
Subject Characteristics of Normal Health Volunteers
AE Incidence in Normal Health Volunteers
AEs by Relatedness in Normal Health Volunteers
AEs by Severity/Intensity in Normal Health Volunteers
AEs by Relatedness (%) in in Normal Health Volunteers
Lab. Distribution in in Normal Health Volunteers
Labs. Over Time and Toxicity in Normal Health Volunteers
Labs. Over Time and Toxicity Box in Normal Health Volunteers
Labs. Over Time and Toxicity Waterfall in Normal Health Volunteers
eDISH Plot in Normal Health Volunteers (Evaluation of drug-induced serious hepatotoxicity)
EKG Waterfall in Normal Health Volunteers
EKG Box in Normal Health Volunteers
Filter Settings
adeg
- ECG Test or Examination: (QTC FRIDERICIA)
Vital Signs Waterfall in Normal Health Volunteers
Filter Settings
advs
- Vital Signs Test: (SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE)
adeg
- ECG Test or Examination: (QTC FRIDERICIA)
Vital Signs Box in Normal Health Volunteers
Benefits and Audience Takeaways
1. Safety parameters in Phase-I NHV studies can deviate from the normal range • possibly due to multiplicity of sampling and • fluctuations in normal physiology.
2. The safety parameter out-of-range findings in NHVs receiving placebo may
serve • as a reference to strengthen the basis for signal detection and • decision making during early drug development.
3. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for future studies should be re-examined with
these results in mind.
Key Points
1. First-in-human trials typically recruit normal healthy volunteers (NHVs) who are administered either placebo or investigational drug.
2. Safety parameters in clinical trials include pre-specified normal reference ranges for vital signs, physical examinations, electrocardiograms (ECGs) and laboratory tests.
3. Early phase studies can be terminated or interrupted due to select safety findings; however, deviation in safety parameters from normal reference ranges may not necessarily be pathologic or abnormal.
4. Careful interpretation of safety data is critical to decision making and future safety monitoring.
5. This tool could serve clinicians and PV&E group, as a fallback tool while planning.