precRec on D2, D3
12
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Precision FR Precision vs. FR D2 (random-threshold) D2 (random-weighted) D3 (random) D2 (uniform-threshold) D2 (uniform-weighted) D3 (uniform)
description
Comparing the performance of precRec on D2 (prob. data) using uniform, random approaches and D3 (deterministic data) using a threshold of 0.5. These graphs are updated after corrections to the source precision & recall of deterministic data.
Transcript of precRec on D2, D3
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Prec
isio
n
FR
Precision vs. FR
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Prec
isio
n
Number of Sources
Precision vs. Number of Sources
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Prec
isio
n
Number of Tuples
Precision vs. Number of Tuples
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Prec
isio
n
Truth Fraction (TF)
Precision vs. Truth Fraction
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Rec
all
FR
Recall vs. FR
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Rec
all
Number of Sources
Recall vs. Number of Sources
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Rec
all
Number of Tuples
Recall vs. Number of Tuples
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Rec
all
Truth Fraction (TF)
Recall vs. Truth Fraction
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
F-1
FR
F-1 vs. FR
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
F-1
Number of Sources
F-1 vs. Number of Sources
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
F-1
Number of Tuples
F-1 vs. Number of Tuples
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
F-1
Truth Fraction (TF)
F-1 vs. Truth Fraction
D2 (random-threshold)D2 (random-weighted)
D3 (random)D2 (uniform-threshold)
D2 (uniform-weighted)D3 (uniform)
![Welcome [irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com]...on All-Net & # Div teams D1 D2 D1 D2 D3 D3 Total Eligible Berryessa nanas nanas nanas nanas 1 1 2 ... – School Year and Players Grade must](https://static.fdocuments.us/doc/165x107/5f39c21f0b096c32973b384a/welcome-irp-cdn-on-all-net-div-teams-d1-d2-d1-d2-d3-d3-total-eligible.jpg)
