Precipitation Tests

17
Precipitation Tests Lattice Formation

description

Precipitation Tests. Lattice Formation. Ab in gel. Ag. Ag. Ag. Ag. Diameter 2. Ag Concentration. Radial Immunodiffusion (Mancini). Method Ab in gel Ag in a well. Interpretation Diameter of ring is proportional to the concentration Quantitative Ig levels. -. +. Ag. Ag. Ab. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Precipitation Tests

Page 1: Precipitation Tests

Precipitation Tests

Lattice Formation

Page 2: Precipitation Tests

Radial Immunodiffusion (Mancini)

• Interpretation– Diameter of ring is

proportional to the concentration

• Quantitative– Ig levels

• Method– Ab in gel– Ag in a well

Ag Concentration

Dia

met

er2

AgAgAgAg

Ab in gel

Page 3: Precipitation Tests

Immunoelectrophoresis• Method

– Ags are separated by electrophoresis

• Interpretation– Precipitin arc represent individual antigens

Ag-+

Ag

Ab

Ag

Ab

– Ab is placed in trough cut in the agar

Page 4: Precipitation Tests

Immunoelectrophoresis

• Method

• Interpretation

• Qualitative– Relative concentration

Page 5: Precipitation Tests

Countercurrent electrophoresis• Method

– Ag and Ab migrate toward each other by electrophoresis

– Used only when Ag and Ab have opposite charges

• Qualitative–Rapid

Ag Ab- +

Page 6: Precipitation Tests

Radioimmuoassays (RIA)Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent

Assays (ELISA)

Lattice formation not required

Page 7: Precipitation Tests

Competitive RIA/ELISA for Ag

• Method– Determine amount

of Ab needed to bind to a known amount of labeled Ag

+

Prior to Test

Labeled Ag

+

Test

+Patient’ssample

LabeledAg

+

– Use predetermined amounts of labeled Ag and Ab and add a sample containing unlabeled Ag as a competitor

Page 8: Precipitation Tests

Competitive RIA/ELISA for Ag • Method cont.

– Determine amount of labeled Ag bound to Ab NH4SO4

anti-Ig • Immobilize the Ab

• Quantitative– Most sensitive test

+ Test

+Patient’ssample

LabeledAg

+

– Concentration determined from a standard curve using known amounts of unlabeled Ag

SolidPhase

SolidPhase

Page 9: Precipitation Tests

Solid Phase Non-Competitive RIA/ELISA

• Ab detection– Immobilize Ag– Incubate with sample– Add labeled anti-Ig– Amount of labeled Ab

bound is proportional to amount of Ab in the sample

• Quantitative

SolidPhase

AgImmobilized

Ab in Patient’s

sample

LabeledAnti-Ig

Page 10: Precipitation Tests

Solid Phase Non-Competitive RIA/ELISA

• Ag detection– Immobilize Ab– Incubate with sample– Add labeled antibody– Amount of labeled Ab

bound is proportional to the amount of Ag in the sample

• Quantitative

SolidPhase

Ag

Immobilized

Ag in Patient’s

sample

LabeledAb

Page 11: Precipitation Tests

Tests for Cell Associated Antigens

Lattice formation not required

Page 12: Precipitation Tests

Immunofluorescence

• Direct– Ab to tissue Ag is labeled with fluorochrome

Ag

FluorochromeLabeled Ab

Tissue Section

Page 13: Precipitation Tests

Immunofluorescence

• Indirect– Ab to tissue Ag is

unlabeled– Fluorochrome-labeled anti-

Ig is used to detect binding of the first Ab.

Ag

FluorochromeLabeled Anti-Ig

Tissue Section

UnlabeledAb

• Qualitative to Semi-Quantitative

Page 14: Precipitation Tests

Immunofluorescence

• Flow Cytometry– Cells in suspension are labeld with fluorescent tag

• Direct or Indirect Fluorescence– Cells analyzed on a flow cytometer

FlowTip

Laser

FLDetector

LightScatter

Detector

Page 15: Precipitation Tests

Immunofluorescence

• Flow Cytometry cont.– Data displayed

Green Fluorescence Intensity

Nu

mb

er o

f C

ells

Unstained cells

FITC-labeled cells

One Parameter Histogram

Red Fluorescence Intensity

Gre

en F

luor

esce

nce

In

ten

sity

Two Parameter Histogram

Page 16: Precipitation Tests

Assays Based on Complement

Lattice formation not required

Page 17: Precipitation Tests

Complement Fixation

– Ag mixed with test serum to be assayed for Ab– Standard amount of complement is added– Erythrocytes coated with Abs is added– Amount of erythrocyte lysis is determined

Ag

Patient’sserum

Ag No Ag

Ag

• Methodology