Precarious professionalism

97
Precarious Professionalism

description

Inaugural Lecture 6 March 2014

Transcript of Precarious professionalism

Page 1: Precarious professionalism

Precarious Professionalism

Page 2: Precarious professionalism
Page 3: Precarious professionalism
Page 4: Precarious professionalism
Page 5: Precarious professionalism
Page 6: Precarious professionalism

•Professionalism?

Page 7: Precarious professionalism

Why did you become a lawyer?

Why do you think others want to

become lawyers?

Page 8: Precarious professionalism

The (wannabe) lawyers…

Page 9: Precarious professionalism

And the non lawyers…

Page 10: Precarious professionalism

Are these values important?

Page 11: Precarious professionalism

Salaries of trainees before minimum salary

abolished• SRA 2011

Page 12: Precarious professionalism

Defining professionalism

Page 13: Precarious professionalism

Professions, ―are devoted to the

service of the public, above

and beyond material

incentives.‖ Larson

Page 14: Precarious professionalism

―the use of discipline knowledge

and skill for the public good.‖

Page 15: Precarious professionalism

that raising up implies, ―a duty to appraise what they do in the light of the large good, duty which licenses them to be more than passive servants of the state, of capital, of the firm, the client, or even of the immediate general public.‖

Page 16: Precarious professionalism

Ideological to institutional claim

Market

State

Self

Page 17: Precarious professionalism

Separate from the market

but rewarded by the market

Page 18: Precarious professionalism
Page 19: Precarious professionalism

Profession

Market

State

Public

Self

Page 20: Precarious professionalism

Legitmacy crisis

Reality check

Page 21: Precarious professionalism

Key, precarious claims• We are more competent

• We are more ethical

• Our solutions are the most relevant

• Our knowledge is state of the art

• Our regulation is optimal

Page 22: Precarious professionalism

1. We are (more) competent

Page 23: Precarious professionalism

What do we mean by quality?

Page 24: Precarious professionalism

How many cases should pass?

/100

Page 25: Precarious professionalism

If professionalism is not to be precarious, then would

we not see the professions outperform the non-

professionals?

Page 26: Precarious professionalism

Non-solicitors vs Solicitors

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

Solicitors Non-Solicitors

Very good or better Poor or worse

0% 5% 10% 15%

Getting a Result

Solicitors Non-Solicitors

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

Good ir better Poor or worse

Solicitors Non-Solicitors

Page 27: Precarious professionalism

3 more studies…

Specialist LA SW Contracts

Solicitors -30%

NFPs -14%

Generalists awarenessof legal issues when

they decided to advise

Solicitors -68%

NFPs -74%

Wills

Solicitors -22%

Will writers -21%

Page 28: Precarious professionalism

/100?

Page 29: Precarious professionalism
Page 30: Precarious professionalism

Prosecutors

HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (2009), Thematic review of quality of prosecution advocacy and case presentation

Page 31: Precarious professionalism

Prosecutors

HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (2009), Thematic review of quality of prosecution advocacy and case presentation

Page 32: Precarious professionalism

Better off without lawyers?

Page 33: Precarious professionalism

Gulati and Scott

"Most of what we mark up

and send round, we don't

understand at all."

Page 34: Precarious professionalism

Our solutions are the most relevant

Our knowledge is state of the art

Page 35: Precarious professionalism

•Take Instructions

•Draft Contracts

1

•Negotiate Terms

•Redraft Contracts

2•Finalise Contract

•Put it in a file

3

Page 36: Precarious professionalism

Systemise/monitor contract termsMonitor/structure negotiations

(playbooks)Automate processes (coding)

• Take Instructions

• Draft Contracts

1

• Negotiate Terms

• Redraft Contracts

2• Finali

se Contract

• Put it in a file

3

• Take Instructions

• Draft Contracts

1

• Negotiate Terms

• Redraft Contracts

2• Finali

se Contract

• Put it in a file

3

• Take Instructions

• Draft Contracts

1

• Negotiate Terms

• Redraft Contracts

2• Finali

se Contract

• Put it in a file

3

• Take Instructions

• Draft Contracts

1

• Negotiate Terms

• Redraft Contracts

2• Finali

se Contract

• Put it in a file

3

• Take Instructions

• Draft Contracts

1

• Negotiate Terms

• Redraft Contracts

2• Finali

se Contract

• Put it in a file

3

• Take Instructions

• Draft Contracts

1

• Negotiate Terms

• Redraft Contracts

2• Finali

se Contract

• Put it in a file

3

• Take Instructions

• Draft Contracts

1

• Negotiate Terms

• Redraft Contracts

2• Finali

se Contract

• Put it in a file

3

• Take Instructions

• Draft Contracts

1

• Negotiate Terms

• Redraft Contracts

2• Finali

se Contract

• Put it in a file

3

• Take Instructions

• Draft Contracts

1

• Negotiate Terms

• Redraft Contracts

2• Finali

se Contract

• Put it in a file

3

• Take Instructions

• Draft Contracts

1

• Negotiate Terms

• Redraft Contracts

2• Finali

se Contract

• Put it in a file

3

Page 37: Precarious professionalism

Profession

Market

State

Public

Self

Page 38: Precarious professionalism

Design – Decide –Evaluate

• Online Dispute Resolution that resolves the majority

of cases without any human agency

• An algorithm predicts US supreme court outcomes –

using just 6 Variables – better than experts

• Machine learning software better at discovery of

evidence tasks than humans

• Software which tells you where to pitch your offer

• AI and IBMs Watson – if it can help diagnose

cancer….

Page 39: Precarious professionalism

We are more ethical?

Page 40: Precarious professionalism
Page 41: Precarious professionalism

35% trust lawyers, 30% do not

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Trust

Don’t trust

Page 42: Precarious professionalism

How could you? How do you?

Page 43: Precarious professionalism
Page 44: Precarious professionalism

21% think lawyers act in the best interests of their client

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Act in the best interest of consumers

Act in the best interest of consumers

Page 45: Precarious professionalism

20% think lawyers act ethically

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Act ethically

Act ethically

Page 46: Precarious professionalism

A capacity for sophistry…

Page 47: Precarious professionalism

A general professional regard?

• there is a fundamental quality

inherent in this profession of integrity, ethics, and ideals and

we are all very client service-

oriented. We put at the forefront

the needs of our clients.• James Schiro, then CEO PWC

47

Page 48: Precarious professionalism

• ―We are professionals that follow

our code of ethics and practice

by the highest moral standards.

We would never be influenced by

our own personal financial well-being.‖ • Gary Shamis, American Institute of Certified Public

Accountants

Page 49: Precarious professionalism

Does thinking of oneself as a professional make one more ethical?

• Maryam Kouchaki, Professionalism and Moral Behavior: Does a Professional Self-Conception Make One More Unethical?

Page 50: Precarious professionalism

• [Barristers] must promote and protect

fearlessly and by all proper and lawful

means the lay client's best interests and do

so without regard to his own interests or to

any consequences to himself or to any other

person...

Bar Code of Conduct

Page 51: Precarious professionalism

You must observe your duty to

the court in the administration of justice

Page 52: Precarious professionalism
Page 53: Precarious professionalism

Status/Money

Doing good

Interesting work

Page 54: Precarious professionalism

Zeal too strong?

• Reaching the top

• PEP and other

indicators

• Hourly rates

• Business focus

• 'client first was

bred into me'.

Page 55: Precarious professionalism

Does money affect the way we think?

Page 56: Precarious professionalism

The money prime

Page 57: Precarious professionalism

Client first…

Putting the client first was bred into

me. The regulatory objectives set

out in the Legal Services Act serve

to remind us of (and enforce) our

higher duties, to the rule of law and

the wider public interest

Page 58: Precarious professionalism

Client first……but from day to day the principal question in the mind of a solicitor will always be, 'what is best for this client?' That is what it means to be a professional and it is where we differ — or are supposed to differ — from people in other walks of life. It is not a question of "box-ticking", for we are trustees of the values we have inherited, with a duty to future generations.

The Rt Hon the Lord Hunt of the Wirral MBE

Page 59: Precarious professionalism

Where two or more Principles come into

conflict

• the one which takes precedence is the

one which best serves the public

interest in the particular

circumstances, especially the public

interest in the proper administration of

justice.

Page 60: Precarious professionalism

Hidden biases

Page 61: Precarious professionalism

Framing… why might this be important?

• ‗‗This research project is being

conducted to advance the ideals and

aspirations pursued by applied social

science.''

• ‗‗This research project is being

conducted with strict adherence to

the standards and obligations required

of applied social science.'‗

Page 62: Precarious professionalism
Page 63: Precarious professionalism
Page 64: Precarious professionalism

How commercial lawyers see their role

• ―always make sure that the client …understand[s]

the law. I think they also need to understand what

the law is trying to achieve, so that if there is a grey

area they know the correct way to interpret it.‖

Page 65: Precarious professionalism

Grey Discomfort

―Ill-advised activity by some senior

managers…‖ and

―the demands of management to

do certain things, which …hover on

the edge of illegality.‖

Page 66: Precarious professionalism

Managed dissonance…―[O]k, you‘re not really being asked

to make it happen but you‘re being

asked to kind of... brainstorm these

ideas which you feel deeply

uncomfortable about, but which

you kind of have to go along with

because the top management has

kind of given this undertaking to do

everything it can to help….‖

Page 67: Precarious professionalism

What kind of unlawfulness is okay?

―non-criminal” activity ―sort of on the

edge of commercial practice”

…. When you‘re advising a best course

of action which isn’t criminal, it’s just

commercial, they can choose to ignore

you, and you‘re an employee.‖

Page 68: Precarious professionalism

Public, client or firm interest?

―I would say that the firm that I work for is primarily focused on its own commercial interests and I think it would argue that it‘s by placing importance on the other two that that is going to be best achieved.‖

Page 69: Precarious professionalism

Overbilling a client

―... well I know what they will do

[laughs] …is keep their mouth

shut, and not look like idiot...

because …they don‘t want to lose

the firm money and look like

people who want to give it away.

… you do that at some risk to

yourself…‖

Page 70: Precarious professionalism

Promotion or compliance?

I don‘t think I‘ve ever come across any support or encouragement on [the ethics] front. …it‘s assumed that you‘ve …gone through your ethics training …and you are meant to know it all. Nothing has ever, really ever, been said to me …from the partners or in terms of training that in any way encourages it or supports it.

Page 71: Precarious professionalism
Page 72: Precarious professionalism

Where were the lawyers?• Lehman needed that Opinion to

argue for an accounting approach which reduced their leverage

• Linklaters advised that Repo Transactions were ‘true sales’ (they were at English Law)

• There were other tests Lehman needed to apply

• Lawyer’s advice used by Lehman’s to give impression the tests had been passed. When only one had been

• Did/should Linklaters’ understand the consequences and do anything about it?

• Kershaw and Moorhead (2013) Consequential Responsibility for Client Wrongs: Lehman Brothers and the Regulation of the Legal Profession

Page 73: Precarious professionalism

Nightjack• J hacks email, establishes

who Nightjack is

• Meets AB (in-house lawyer)

• J establishes ID via legitimate means

• DC Horton seeks Injunction

• No cross-examination

• AB drafts injunction

• Affidavit implies, or states, J began search process legitimately

• Sceptical opponents do not take the point

Page 74: Precarious professionalism
Page 75: Precarious professionalism

Rupert Murdoch @ Leveson

• I think the senior executives were all informed, and I --were all misinformed and shielded from anything that was going on there, and I do blame one or two people for that, who perhaps I shouldn't name, because for all I know they may be arrested yet, but there's no question in my mind that maybe even the editor, but certainly beyond that someone took charge of a cover-up, which we were victim to....

75

Page 76: Precarious professionalism

Some other cases with questions

Page 77: Precarious professionalism

Our regulation is optimal?

Page 78: Precarious professionalism

Our regulation is optimal?

Profession

Market

State

Public

Self

Page 79: Precarious professionalism

LS Regulatory Review• lay membership of the approved

regulators;

• separating the representative and

regulatory functions of the approved

regulators;

• opening up the market to new business

structures and/or greater flexibility

• the handling of consumer complaints.

• consumer panels

Page 80: Precarious professionalism

• Overly complex

• Insufficiently independent of government

• Some support for scaling back regulation

• LSB overreaching or overly prescriptive

Page 81: Precarious professionalism

Key faultlines

• Independence of regulators

from the professions

• Single regulator or multiple

regulators?

Page 82: Precarious professionalism

Market ProblemsCost

Quality?

Access

Page 83: Precarious professionalism

Quality vs cost

who decides and how?

Page 84: Precarious professionalism

Regulatory TechniquesEntry Education and training

Fit and proper person tests

COLP/COFAs

Systems and internal processes

Consumer information

CPD

Page 85: Precarious professionalism

Regulatory TechnologiesInsurance

Specialisation Panels

Quality marks

Codes/outcomes/rules

Risk profiling, monitoring and supervision

In-house complaints procedures

Page 86: Precarious professionalism

Regulatory ApproachesLegal Ombudsman

Compensation/costs reduction

Investigation

Informal resolution

Censure / Fine / Suspension / Strike Off

Page 87: Precarious professionalism
Page 88: Precarious professionalism

SRA Benchmarking Survey 2011

Page 89: Precarious professionalism

SRA Benchmarking Survey 2011

Page 90: Precarious professionalism

SRA Benchmarking Survey 20101

Page 91: Precarious professionalism

Some final words…• What we need is?

o a deliberative science policy culture,

o emphasising reflexive learning and responsiveness;

o an open organisational culture, emphasising innovation, creativity, interdisciplinarity, experimentation and risk taking;

o top-level leadership and commitment to public engagement and to taking account of the public interest; and

o commitments to openness and transparency.o Stilgoe et al

Page 92: Precarious professionalism

Some final words…• What we need is?

o a deliberative science policy culture,

o emphasising reflexive learning and responsiveness;

o an open organisational culture, emphasising innovation, creativity, interdisciplinarity, experimentation and risk taking;

o top-level leadership and commitment to public engagement and to taking account of the public interest; and

o commitments to openness and transparency.

Page 93: Precarious professionalism

Some final words…• What we need is?

o a deliberative science policy culture,

o emphasising reflexive learning and responsiveness;

o an open organisational culture, emphasising innovation, creativity, interdisciplinarity, experimentation and risk taking;

o top-level leadership and commitment to public engagement and to taking account of the public interest; and

o commitments to openness and transparency.

Page 94: Precarious professionalism

Some final words…• What we need is?

o a deliberative science policy culture,

o emphasising reflexive learning and responsiveness;

o an open organisational culture, emphasising innovation, creativity, interdisciplinarity, experimentation and risk taking;

o top-level leadership and commitment to public engagement and to taking account of the public interest; and

o commitments to openness and transparency.

Page 95: Precarious professionalism

Some final words…• What we need is?

o a deliberative science policy culture,

o emphasising reflexive learning and responsiveness;

o an open organisational culture, emphasising innovation, creativity, interdisciplinarity, experimentation and risk taking;

o top-level leadership and commitment to public engagement and to taking account of the public interest; and

o commitments to openness and transparency.

Page 96: Precarious professionalism

Some final words…• What we need is?

o a deliberative science policy culture,

o emphasising reflexive learning and responsiveness;

o an open organisational culture, emphasising innovation, creativity, interdisciplinarity, experimentation and risk taking;

o top-level leadership and commitment to public engagement and to taking account of the public interest; and

o commitments to openness and transparency.

Page 97: Precarious professionalism

Thank you for listening