Pre0019-Mottet Nicolas - SIOGADT benefit RTOG 85-31 1 EORTC22863 2 EORTC 22961 3 N 977 415 970 ADT...
Transcript of Pre0019-Mottet Nicolas - SIOGADT benefit RTOG 85-31 1 EORTC22863 2 EORTC 22961 3 N 977 415 970 ADT...
25/11/2016
1
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
OptimizingOptimizingOptimizingOptimizing the management of the management of the management of the management of
localizedlocalizedlocalizedlocalized prostate cancer prostate cancer prostate cancer prostate cancer in in in in
senior senior senior senior adultsadultsadultsadults
Nicolas MottetChairman EAU-ESTRO-SIOG prostate cancer guidelinesHead of Urology departmentJean-Monnet UniversitySaint-Étienne, France
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
DisclosuresDisclosuresDisclosuresDisclosures
• Receipt of grants/research supports: • Astellas
• Pasteur
• Pierre Fabre
• Sanofi-Genzyme
• Takeda pharmaceutical / Millenium
• Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: • Astellas
• Bayer
• BMS
• Ferring
• IPSEN
• Janssen
• Novartis
• Nuclétron
• Pierre Fabre
• Sanofi-Genzyme
• Takeda pharmaceutical / Millenium
• Zeneca
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
Senior Senior Senior Senior adultsadultsadultsadults have highhave highhave highhave high----risk risk risk risk PCaPCaPCaPCa
Muralidhar V et al. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015;13:525-30.e1-3
• SEER database (US): N=383,039
PCa: prostate cancer
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
case
s
Age (years)
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%23-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-104
Prostate cancer diagnosed in 2004-2011 by age and NCCN risk group
High risk
Intermediate risk
Low risk
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
HighHighHighHigh----risk risk risk risk PCaPCaPCaPCa ---- A A A A lethallethallethallethal diseasediseasediseasedisease????
Akre O et al. Eur Urol 2011;60:554-63
• Swedish national registry
• N=2,625 M0• T3-4, or
• T2 and PSA 50-99 ng/ml
• Non-curative intent treatment
27% 42%
PSA: prostate-specific antigen
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
HighHighHighHigh----risk risk risk risk PCaPCaPCaPCa ---- LLLLocalocalocalocal therapytherapytherapytherapy andandandand ageageageage
• Irish Cancer Registry (2002-2008); N=5,456 pts with T1-T2 N0M0 PCa
De Camargo Cancela M et al. Br J Cancer 2013;109:272-9
91 87
52.6
6.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
40-59 60-69 70-79 80+
% w
ith
loca
lth
erap
y
Age (years)
Local therapy
Gleason <889
81
50
16
0
20
40
60
80
100
40-59 60-69 70-79 80+
% w
ith
loca
lth
erap
y
Age (years)
Local therapy
Gleason 8-10
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
SPCG 4 SPCG 4 SPCG 4 SPCG 4 –––– SurgerySurgerySurgerySurgery improvesimprovesimprovesimproves survivalsurvivalsurvivalsurvival
• 695 men randomized to RP or WW• T2: >75%
• Mean PSA: 12.8 ng/ml
• Median follow-up: 23.2 years
• RP improves OS and CSS
Bill-Axelson A et al. N Engl J Med 2014;370:932-42
Population RR (CI 95%)
OSCSS
0.71 (0.59 – 0.86)
0.56 (0.41 – 0.77)
CI: confidence interval; CSS: cancer-specific survival;
OS: overal survival; RP: radical prostatectomy;
RR: relative risk; SPCG: Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group;
WW: watchful waiting
25/11/2016
2
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
PIVOT PIVOT PIVOT PIVOT ---- SurgerySurgerySurgerySurgery does does does does notnotnotnot improveimproveimproveimprove survivalsurvivalsurvivalsurvival
• N=731 men randomized to RP or WW• T1c: 50%
• Gleason ≤6: 70%
• Low risk: 40%; intermediate risk: 34%
• Median follow-up: 10 years
Wilt TJ et al. N Engl J Med 2012;367:203-13
Cancer-specific deathOverall PSA >10 ng/ml
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Overall death 0.88 (0.71-1.08) 0.22 0.67 (0.48-0.94) NA
Cancer-specific death 0.63 (0.36-1.09) 0.09 0.36 (0.15-0.89) NA
HR: hazard ratio; NA: not available
Overall death
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
ProtecTProtecTProtecTProtecT trial trial trial trial –––– Treatment Treatment Treatment Treatment vsvsvsvs activeactiveactiveactive monitoringmonitoringmonitoringmonitoring
• N=1,643 men• T1c: 76%
• Gleason 6: 77%
• Median PSA: 4.6 ng/ml
• Randomized to:• RP (RX discussed if R1 / pT3a / PSA >0.2)
• RX: 74 Gy + 3-6 months ADT(Neoadjuvant /concomitant)
• Active monitoring
Hamdy FC et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1415-24
ADT: androgen deprivation therapy;
ProtecT: Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment;
RX: radiotherapy
RP (n=553)Radiotherapy (n=545)Active monitoring (n=545)
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
ComorbiditiesComorbiditiesComorbiditiesComorbidities ---- THE THE THE THE keykeykeykey driver for survivaldriver for survivaldriver for survivaldriver for survival
• N=19,639 (SEER database)
• No curative local treatment
Albertsen PC et al. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1335-41
T2
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
Life Life Life Life expectancyexpectancyexpectancyexpectancy, , , , ageageageage andandandand health statushealth statushealth statushealth status
Walter LC. JAMA 2001;285:2750-6; Updated to Walter LC. JAMA 2014;311:1336-47 (eAppendix 3) - Calculation from US 2010 Life Tables; update
20
16
12
9
6
4
15
11
8
54
3
9
6
43
21
0
5
10
15
20
25
70 years 75 years 80 years 85 years 90 years 95 years
Me
dia
n l
ife
exp
ect
an
cy (
ye
ars
)
Top 25th percentile
50th percentile
Lowest 25th percentile
Age
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
HHHHealth status is ealth status is ealth status is ealth status is keykeykeykey in in in in localizedlocalizedlocalizedlocalized PCaPCaPCaPCa
• Predictors of non-PCa death:• Comorbidities: strongest predictor
• Age: less significant predictor
• Health status also affects the patient’s ability to tolerate therapies
• Screening to identify patients requiring health status assessment• Comorbidity• Nutritional status• Cognitive and physical functions
Droz JP et al. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:e404–14
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
SurgerySurgerySurgerySurgery for highfor highfor highfor high----risk PCarisk PCarisk PCarisk PCa
• Multi-institutional cohort; N=3,828 with high-risk localized PCa
Briganti A et al. Eur Urol 2013;63:693-701
PCa death
Overall death
CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index
25/11/2016
3
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
ComplicationsComplicationsComplicationsComplications of RPof RPof RPof RP ----
More More More More relatedrelatedrelatedrelated totototo comorbiditiescomorbiditiescomorbiditiescomorbidities thanthanthanthan ageageageage
Post-operative complications after RP are related
to comorbidities, not age
Alibhai SM et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1525-32
Number of comorbidities
Ra
te o
f co
mp
lica
tio
ns
70-79
60-69<60
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0 1 2 3 4+
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
ComplicationsComplicationsComplicationsComplications in 3,477 in 3,477 in 3,477 in 3,477 consecutiveconsecutiveconsecutiveconsecutive RPRPRPRP
Potency Return of
continenceAge
(years)All
Bilateral nerve sparing
Unilateral or partial nerve sparing
< 5050-5960-6970+
92%85%70%51%
93%85%71%52%
75%69%45%56%
95%96%93%86%
P <0.001 <0.001 <0.0001
Kundu SD et al. J Urol 2004;172:2227-31
Higher risk of erectile dysfunction and incontinence in senior adults treated by RP
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
RT in senior RT in senior RT in senior RT in senior adultsadultsadultsadults ---- ToxicityToxicityToxicityToxicity
1Jani AB et al. Urology 2005;66:566-70; ²Hamilton AS et al. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2517-26
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Acute GU Acute GI Late GU Late GI
% o
f m
en
GU/GI toxicity1
(grade ≥2)
<60 yr 60-70 yr 70-74 yr ≥75 yr
P=0.10 P=0.19
P=0.22
P=0.09
70
59
41
63
32
18
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
<65 yr 65-74 yr ≥75 yr
% o
f m
en
Erection quality²
(firm enough for sexual intercourse)
Before treatment 24 months after treatment
GI: gastrointestinal; GU: genitourinary; RT: radiotherapy
N=527 consecutive men; RT in single institution N=497 localized PCa patients treated with RT randomly selected from SEER database
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
RT + short course ADTRT + short course ADTRT + short course ADTRT + short course ADT
• N=206 localized unfavourable risk PCa• Post-hoc analysis; hypothesis generating only
D’Amico AV et al. JAMA 2008;299:289-95
Moderate or severe comorbidity
100
80
60
40
0
20
6 10820 41 3 5 7 9
N=49Log-rank P=0.08
RT+ADT
RT alone
Ove
rall
surv
ival
, %
Time after randomization, years
No or minimal comorbidity
Ove
rall
surv
ival
, %
100
80
60
40
0
20
RT alone
6 10820 41 3 5 7 9
N=157Log-rank P<0.001
RT+ADT
Time after randomization, years
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
RT + ADT in locally advanced RT + ADT in locally advanced RT + ADT in locally advanced RT + ADT in locally advanced PCaPCaPCaPCa
1Pilepich MC et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61:1285-90; ²Bolla M et al. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:1066-73; ³Bolla M et al. N Eng J Med 2009;360;2516-27
100
75
50
25
0
P=0.002
%
RX + LHRH
RX
Years
ADT benefit RTOG 85-311 EORTC 228632 EORTC 229613
N 977 415 970
ADT duration Progression 3 years 6 months / 3 years
Patients T3 and/or N+ T1-2 grade 3 or T3-4 N0 (N1)
T1-4, N0-2 (or pN), M0
CSS YES YES YES
OS YES YES YES
RX + LHRH
RXP=0.0004
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
Locally advanced Locally advanced Locally advanced Locally advanced PCaPCaPCaPCa
Local treatment is mandatoryLocal treatment is mandatoryLocal treatment is mandatoryLocal treatment is mandatory
1Engel J et al. Eur Urol 2010;57:754-61; ²Mason MD et al. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2143-50
HR=2.04 if RP stopped
Surgery (Retrospective cohort N1)1
N=938 (45% T3)Radiotherapy (NCIC PR3 trial)²
N=1,205 (T3/T4 N0/Nx OR T2, PSA >40 µg/l OR T2, PSA >20 µg/ml, Gleason 8-10)
Ove
rall
surv
ival
(%
)
Time (years) Time (years)
HR=0.7
25/11/2016
4
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
OverusageOverusageOverusageOverusage of ADT monotherapy in senior adultsof ADT monotherapy in senior adultsof ADT monotherapy in senior adultsof ADT monotherapy in senior adults
• EORTC 30891 trial• N=985 with T1-4, N0-2 (unwilling /unfit for local therapy)
• 46% T3-4, 77% N0
• Median follow-up: 12.8 years
• 30% died without any ADT
• Benefit of immediate ADTonly in patients at high-risk of death 3-5 yrs after diagnosis (PSA >50 ng/ml, PSA DT <1 yr)
Studer UE et al. Eur Urol 2014;66:829-38
HR=1.21(95% CI 1.05-1.39)P=0.0085
Deferred ADT
Immediate ADT
DT: doubling time
All-causesmortality
Non-PCamortality
PCamortality
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
ADT ADT ADT ADT monotherapymonotherapymonotherapymonotherapy in senior in senior in senior in senior adultsadultsadultsadults
BenefitsBenefitsBenefitsBenefits and and and and harmsharmsharmsharms shouldshouldshouldshould bebebebe carefullycarefullycarefullycarefully weightedweightedweightedweighted
• Increased risk of fracture1
• Increased risk of diabetes2
• Increased risk of thromboembolic events3
• Increased risk of dementia4
• Increased risk of all-cause morbidity in the following cases5-7:• Chronic heart failure
• History of myocardial infarction
• History of stroke
1.Shahinian VB et al. N Engl J Med 2005;352:154-64; 2Keating NL et al. J Clin Oncol 2006;27:4448-56; 3Ehdaie B et al. Cancer 2012;118: 3397-406; 4Nead KT et al. JAMA Oncol 2016; doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3662; 5D‘Amico AV et al. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2420-5; 6Hayes JH et al. BJU Int 2010;106:979-85; 7Nguyen PL et al. Int J RadiatOncol Biol Phys 2012;82:1411-6
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
Vale CL et al. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:243-56
OS
PFS
PFS: progression-free survival
Docetaxel in M0: no placeDocetaxel in M0: no placeDocetaxel in M0: no placeDocetaxel in M0: no place
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
EAUEAUEAUEAU----ESTROESTROESTROESTRO----SIOG guidelines SIOG guidelines SIOG guidelines SIOG guidelines 2016201620162016
Senior adultsSenior adultsSenior adultsSenior adults
www.uroweb.org
SAEU
.CA
B.1
6.0
7.0
04
0i
Treatment decisions in localized diseaseTreatment decisions in localized diseaseTreatment decisions in localized diseaseTreatment decisions in localized disease
• Treatment decision should NOT be based on age
• Treatment decisions should consider:• The risk of dying from cancer (disease factors)
• The risk of dying from another cause (many related to comorbidities than age)
• Treatment-specific side effects / aggressiveness
• PCa-associated complications to interfere with comorbidity
• Patient's preferences