Pradygdha Kumayan Jati - Addressing RE Development Challenges

8/6/2019 Pradygdha Kumayan Jati - Addressing RE Development Challenges

1/25

Addr

RE DevelopmLesson Learn fr

in IND

IBEKA exFeed in Tarif

June 21

ssing

nt Challenges,m Micro-Hydro

IBEKA

N

ESIA

periences, ADB ACEFth

2011


2/25

IBE

IBEKA:

People Centered Business

Director: Mrs. Tri Mumpuni

(Indonesian Coordinator at ParGovernment

IBEKA Focus:

Rural development with renewatools and bargaining.

The use of Renewable Enertheir own way out of pover

A

nd Economics Institute

ners for a New Begining of US

IBEKA

le energy power generation as

y to motivate villager in makingy


3/25

IBEKA histor

Pesantren Infrastructure ProjectElectrification, M

Clean water, Gr

1979 - 1990

Greater Bandung Small Metal Enterprise Development

MHP Disse

1990 -

1986 - 1994

Mandiri Foundation, app

19891988 1990

IB

EKA Foundation, People Centered Busines

y

HP

vitation, Deep Well

IBEKA

Project (Swiss Contact)

ination Project (GTZ-SKAT)

994

ropriate technology group

1991 1992 1993

s and

Economic Institute

Notarial Act17 Agustus 1992


4/25

Renewable EnIndo

NO Non Fossil Energy POTENTICAPACI

1 Hydro 75.670

2 Geothermal 28.53 G

4 Biomass 49.810

5 Solar 4,80 kWh/

6 Wind 3 6 m

7 Uranium 3.000 M

(e.q. 24,112 ton) f

*) Only in Kalimantan Barat

rgy Potential inesia

ALY

INSTALLEDCAPACITY

USAGE RATIO(%)

W 4.200 MW 5,55

1.189 MW 4,2

, ,

W 445 MW 0,89

2/day 14,1 MW -

s 1,4 MW 0,015

r 11 years*)

30 MW 1,00


5/25

ElectrificRASIO ELEKT

NAD

72,65%

Sumut

85.76%

Riau + Kepri

63.15%

Kalbar

53.74%

Kalteng

49.87%

Kalti

66%

Sumbar

68.75%

Sumsel

50.75%

Bengkulu

50.64%

Babel

69.27%

Lampung

49.23%

Jakarta

100%

Banten

58.44%Jabar

63.40% Jateng

63.77%

Jambi

47.03%

Jogya

74.37%

Jatim

63.67%

B

78.

Kalsel

67.38%

Suls

60.8

RTAHUN 1980 1985 1990 1995Electrificati

on Ratio 8% 16% 28% 43%Target 2009: 67.2%, 2020: 90%, 2025: 93%

tion RatioIFIKASI

Sulut

61.84%

Gorontalo

43.31%

Malut

54.15%

Category :

> 60 %

41 - 60 %

20 - 40 %

16

ali

37%

NTB

0.48%

NTT

26.35%

Sulteng51%

Sultra

43.88%

l

%

Maluku

58.06%

Papua + Irjabar

35.35%

sio Elektrifikasi : 63.9%000 2005 2006 2007 2008

3% 62% 63% 64 % 65%


6/25


7/25

Technical

Selecting appropriat

+Available nearby RE

Economical Scale:

+Focus on the rural escommunication)

From Micro-Hydro:+Flow duration curve

+power plant design

hallenges

technology:

potential

sential needs (lights &

rediction


8/25

Technical

Hydro Power Plant

+River Dam design

+Turbine & mechanic

+Electrical installation

Everything can be cal

Flow duration curveOnly can be predicted

hallenges

esign:

l design

ulated & design


9/25

Grid ystem


10/25

TechnicalFlow duration curve:

100 year flood:Qt: Peak flow for t-period (m3/day)

: o a run-o coe c en

iT : rain flow for T-period (mm/h)

A : area

hallenges Bearing Lifetime:


11/25

True Ch Mainly caused from:

+Interference (disturbactivity by local villa

+High land acuisitionland cost after const

+Decreasing of Flow f

+Many unofficial retrib

llengesSocial Aspects

nce) of constructioner

ost / high additionaluction

om deforestation

tion by local villager


12/25

True ChallenWhat happen if focus

with: Establishment of local

+ ower manu ac ur ng coon quality)

Capacity building on te

+Speed up rural developactivity

+Lower Overhead cost (2

social)

es + Strategyn Social Development

anufacturing

s ong erm superv s ng

hnical & management

ent with sustainable

supervisor: technical &


13/25


with:

Even share between

+ Investor = provide o+ Community = have

man power

(Fully implemented aftreach payback)

It will raise the pride avillager to find their


:

erall financingatural resources +

r the investment

d motivation of ruralay out of poverty


14/25


with:

Provide incentive for

plantation activity.

+More ensure the flow


community who lived

stability in the future


15/25

ELECTRIFICATION & COM

MicrohydroMicrohydroMicrohydroMicrohydroCommunityCommunityCommunityCommunityaaaa

u a naus a n aus a n au a na

IBEKA

MUNITY EMPOWERMENT

evelopment,evelopment,evelopment,evelopment,mpowermentmpowermentmpowermentmpowermentdddd

y r nc e y r n c es y r nc e s y r nc e


16/25

political stability

favorable economicaland social trends

Local resources

Ecological soundnessgood environmental condition

outside contributions

ADVISE, TECHNOLOGY,TRAINING, FINANCIAL

complementarytransparent/open

well dosed

IBEKA

Local contribution

manure

continuously monitored

IBEKA


17/25

Technical

aspect

Civil Construction

Mechanical &Electrical

Distribution Line

Communitypreparation

ocial

Microhydrodevelopment

Physical

quantitative outreach

projectoriented

attitude

neglecting community condition and persp

CAPACITY b

ermentattitu

de

Microhydro

development

internalizing community condition and perspe

Capacity& Equitybuilding

aspect(phase I)

Socialaspect(phase II)

STABILITY LINE

Social transformation

qualitative goals

CAPACITY &

EQUITY building

localemp

o

IBEKA

20% - 30%

Keppres 80

th 2003

(PRA)RECON -NAISSANCEand CON -SOLIDATION

PARTISIPA -TORYCONS -TRUC -TION

1

2

ase line data

rganization set-up 70% - 80%

S

hortTerm

SocialDevelopment

Terminology

ective

uilding

SUSTAINABILITY BOUNDARYctive

Village ResourceUtilization

Entrepreneurinitiation

Child Education &Youth Mainstreaming

Incomegeneration

OrganizationManagement

Lon

gTerm

SELF

ORGANI -ZING

ADDEDVALUE

INTEGRATION

cro y ro anagemen

MediumTerm

EDUCATION,LONGEVITYCREATION

SATURATION,MATURA -TION

Trainingandappren -ticeship

IBEKA


18/25

MicrohydroMicrohydroMicrohydroMicrohydroaaaaPublic PrivaPublic Priva Public Priva Public Priva

ELECTRICITY & COMM

IBEKA

evelopmentevelopmentevelopmentevelopmentddddPartnershipPartnershipPartnershipPartnership

NITY EMPOWERMENT

IBEKA


19/25

UN-ESCAP

co

U

organization

I. Project initiator / source of

CINTA MEKAR PUBLI

PT. HIDROPIRANTIHIBS (private, for profit)

YAYASAN IBEKA(NGO, non profit)

U

U

tribution

$ 75.000To be granted to CintaMekar Village Coop, as

und

C PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP 1

IBEKA

$ 75.000

$ 75.000

commun y s are.

Dedicated for MHPdissemination andtraining facility

50% private share

IBEKA


20/25

II. Cash flow projection

Joint Venture monthly

100 Kw x 24 h x 25 d/mth x Rp

De reciation O eration & main

CINTA MEKAR PUBLIC P

Earning b

Earning

PT Hidropira

Mekarsari c

ower sales income

432,-/Kwh =

(+/- US $ 2,970)

Rp 25.920.000,-

tenance = R 15.500.000 -

RIVATE PARTNERSHIP 2

IBEKA

fore tax =

after tax =

(+/- US $ 1,088)

ti 50 %

Rp 10.420.000,-

Rp 9.470.000,-

oop 50 %

IBEKA


21/25

CINTA MEKAR PUBLIC P

Village development activit

Dedicated for

Education * Scholarship

Electrification 122 house hold

Approximate Mekarsari coop

ra n ng or a

Health care

Seed capital / income generati

Village infrastructure

Village operational contribution

Cooperative operational cost

The priority above is for the first 17 month ope

set by public meeting, and have been change

IBEKA

RIVATE PARTNERSHIP 3

(8 %)

(62,5 %)

onthly income Rp 4.735.000,-

0 %

65 %

t

(8 %)

g (10 %)

(4 %)

(2,5 %)

(5 %)

ration, based on electrification cost for 122 hh,

by the same manner after 122 hh electrified

16 %

7,5 %

4 %

2,5 %

5 %


22/25

SumRural energy with ren

Economics & Technicalculated, but in the

Social incentive musFeed in Tarif (comm

in catchment area +

arywable power:

cal can be design &implementation it

.

t be calculated in thenity in surrouding also

more forest plantation)


23/25

SumRural energy with ren

Hydro), have the PotReduction of construct

Lower overheads + noStabile power delivery

Stabile return (even fo+Most important: The

be sustainable, and

alleviation.(Main Go

arywable power (Micro

ential of:ion cost

illegal retribution(more ensure flow)

Off-grid)ural development canromote povery

l)

I hope my water resources can be developed for


24/25

I hope my water resources can be developed forsustainable rural development.

Even share will give a pride and motivation for us to getout of poverty by ourself.Rural economy development & education will teach us topreserve forest as the water resources.


25/25

IB

IBEKA:

People Centered Business

Jl. Madrasah II No.28 Jakarta, In

(Secretary: [email protected])

. .

Program Officer: Pradygdha Ku

([email protected]), exper

Anti Corruption expert's assist

Waste To Energy Power Gen

Tidal Power Generation Rese

Municipal Waste Processing (

New Zealand's Sustainable E

More on appropriate RE techn

KA

nd Economics Institute

donesia +62-21-5492087

.

ayan Jati, ST.

ence:

nt

ration Research

rch

iogas, Gasification, Landfill)

ergy Study 2008.

ology for rural development.

Pradygdha Kumayan Jati - Addressing RE Development Challenges

Documents

Transcript of Pradygdha Kumayan Jati - Addressing RE Development Challenges