BAPU: Efficient and Practical Bunching of Access Point Uplinks
Practical point
description
Transcript of Practical point
![Page 1: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Practical point
There are some situations where atypia is noted, but other factors preclude a diagnosis of FEA, ADH, or DCIS.
E.g. Very few cells, fragmented specimen, only in lobules.
May use something along the lines of: Epithelial proliferation with atypia, see comment.
Results in close follow-up, re-core, excision, depending on clinical/radiographic setting.
![Page 5: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
CCC
FEA
![Page 9: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Risks and management
UDH ADH LG DCIS FEARR of IDC 1.5x 3-5x 8-10x Less than
ADHUpgrade rate to DCIS on excision
N/A 15-50%* N/A 25-40% **
Management Nil Excise Excise +/- radiation
Excise
Type of risk Indicator, bilateral
Indicator, bilateral
Precursor Indicator
** Limited data and wide variation in reported upgrade rate.
* 3 or more foci on core biopsy and micropapillary architecture predict greater risk.
![Page 10: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Diagnostic reproducibility
Multiple studies have indicated that interobserver agreement is poor, particularly when standardized criteria are not used.
Most variability among ADH vs small volume LG DCIS
In one study, diagnostic consistency was not significantly better when interpretation was confined to a single image, rather than the whole slide(s), reflecting inconsistencies in morphological interpretation
?Concerns re accurate risk of breast ca development because of this
Elston et al. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 1769-72.
![Page 11: Practical point](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568165f4550346895dd919ab/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Diagnostic reproducibility
Jain et al. Mod Pathol 2011 Jul;24(7):917-23.