ppt.pptx
-
Upload
suliman-garalleh -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
Transcript of ppt.pptx
Case presentation
*Name: Faris Shnbor
*Age: 11 years old
*Gender: Male
*Occupation: Student
*Date of examination: 9 – Oct -2014
**Chief Complaint:
-Patient complained of his forwardly placed and misaligned upper incisors.
**Medical history:
-His dad claimed that Faris is medically fit and he doesn't take any medications.
**Dental history:
- multiple previous restorations, and primary teeth extractions, with no complications
**Social history & habits : -Patient denied any habit. **patient motivation:
The patient was very motivated to start and follow up the treatment.
Extra-Oral Examination
Extra-Oral photos
Extra oral Examination
Frontal View
*Acceptable facial balance and symmetry.
* Deviated chin
*Normal Lower anterior Facial Height (50-55%)
Extra oral examination Frontal view
Facial symmetry Upper & lower facial heights
Extra oral Examination
Profile View
Convex profile angle.Class II skeletal Relationship.
?????????????????
Extra oral examination profile view
Profile view
Average FMPA.(about 30°)
Extra oral Examination
Soft tissue analysis
Soft tissue Analysis1. Incompetent lips
2. Reduced Nasolabial angle
Soft tissue Analysis, Cont.
Prominent upper and lower lips to the E-Line
Upper lip by(2mm) lower lip by (4mm)
Soft tissue Analysis, Cont.
Paranasal area
Soft tissue Analysis, Cont.
Intra-Oral Examination
Intra-oral photos
Intra-Oral Examination
Upper Arch
Poor Oral Hygiene
Upper Arch:
Teeth Number: 12 teeth. 6 teeth/ sideCs, Ds, Es were still presentU shaped archMultiple restorationsAverage upper incisors inclinationmild crowding (4 mm) ‘clinically” ????????????
Intra Oral Examination
Intra-Oral Examination
Lower Arch
Lower Arch:
Teeth Number: 12 teeth, 6 teeth per side Cs, Ds, Es were still present
Average Incisor inclination.
Mild crowding in the lower anterior segment.(2mm) “clinically”
Intra-Oral ExaminationInter-arch relation ships
Increased Over Jet (8 mm)Class II div I incisor relationship
????????Right Side: Canine (class II quarter unit)Molar (class II full unit)
Left Side:Canine (class II quarter unit)Molar (class II full unit)
Anterior Posterior Relation
Vertical Relation:Increased OverbiteHyper active upper lip muscle Gummy smile
Transverse RelationNormal Upper midline is coincident with the midfacial axisUpper and lower midline is not concident ( lower midline is shifted to the right by 2mm)
Study casts
Space Analysis Jonhston and Tanaka Upper Jaw
Space available: Rt 24 Lf 25 Space Predicted: Rt 22 Lf 22 Spacing +2 mm +3mm
Space Analysis Johnston and Tanaka Lower Jaw
Space available: Rt 27 Lf 27 Space Predicted: Rt 21.5 Lf 21.5 Spacing +5.5 mm +5.5 mm
Panoramic Radiograph Late mixed dentition All teeth are present
No pathology Rotated lower
premolars
Lateral cephalogram
Cephalometric Land marks
Cephalometric Tracing
Normal value interpretation
Pre- Treatment Variable
82± 3 82 SNA
79 ± 3 retrognathic mandible
75 SNB
1±3 skeletal class II 7 ANB
108 ± 5 105 UI - Mx
92 ± 5 proclined 101 LI - Mn
5±126 127 Gonial angle
27 ± 5 30 MM angle
27 ± 5 31 FM angle
1- skeletal class II 2 AO ahead of BO
Wit’s measurements
50%-55% 52% Anterior face height
0-2 1.5 Lower incisor to A-Po
90±5
133±10
93
123
A-B/FOP
Interincisal angle
87±3 retrognathic mandible
76 SN-Po
Diagnosis Class II div I incisor relaionship based on class II skeletal
relationship complicated by
Increased overjet and over bite Bilateral Class II full unit molar relationship Mild upper and lower crowding of the current dentition Incompetent lips Shifted lower midline to the right by 1mm Prominent upper and lower lips Gummy smile
Over all Aims of Treatment To correct incisor relationship, align the upper incisors
and relief the anterior crowding in the upper arch To correct molar relation ships To reduce the overjet and overbite To correct the shifted midline To achieve esthetically pleasing soft tissue “correct the
gummy smile”
Treatment plan suggestion
Phase 1 Functional appliance to stimulate the
mandibular growth and to decrease upper and lower skeletal discrepancy
Phase 2 Reassessment of the dentition, and referal for
fixed treatment
Functional applianceAndreasen with maxillary torquing spurs
Retention
possibly Continue wearing the functional appliance
during phase 1
Thank you