powers of executors
-
Upload
bipluv-jhingan -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
Transcript of powers of executors
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
1/19
The Powers and Duties of Administrators
and Executors
Bipluv Jhingan (666)
Archana Suswaram (654)
INTRODUCTION
THE EXECUTOR
A person making a will is called a testator and has an obligation and a choice to nominate his or
her Executor and the role which he will be and willing to serve in it.
A person named as an executor in a will is free to accept or reject the position within a
reasonable time following the testator's death. If it is rejected, the court then must appoint
another representative, causing a delay in the settlement of the estate and its final distribution to
the heirs, and incurring greater legal fees for the estate.
Competency to become a Executor
Anyone who is capable of making a will is capable of becoming an executor.. Courts can
disqualify as executors persons who are legally incompetent or unsuitable. When this occurs, the
court appoints either an alternative executor, if the will has named one, or an administrator.
A person cannot be disqualified as an executor merely because he or she might inherit part of the
estate. Executors must submit the will to probate court, then dispose of the estate according to
the will.
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
2/19
THE ADMINISTRATOR
A court usually appoints an administrator when a person dies without leaving a will. Courts are
required by statute to name the spouse of the decedent as administrator. Where no spouse is
involved, administration is usually assigned to the next of kin, such as parents, brothers and
sisters, nieces and nephews, or cousins. Special laws, called statutes of Descent and Distribution,
determine the next of kin who are entitled to serve as administrators.
To appoint an executor is to place one in the stead of the testator who may enter, to the
testators goods and chattels and who has actionagainst testators debtors and who may dispose
of the same goods and chattels towards the payment of the testators debts and performance of
his will. Unless separate executors are appointed an executorship is indivisible,1an executor is
the person appointed ordinarily by the testator by his will or codicil to administer testatorsproperty and to carry into effect the provisions of the will. An executor de son tort is one
who takes upon himself the office of an executor or meddles with the goods of a deceased
person, without being appointed by testators last valid will or by a codicil to that will or without
having obtained grant of administration from a competent court.
A will must contain expressly or by necessary implication the name of the executor;
otherwise no probate can be granted to any person.2Where in a will the testator did not appoint
any executor but granted the whole of his property to a person by testamentary disposition, such
persons may be called a universal legatee and not an executor. A universal legatee can be
legitimately granted letters of administration in respect of the whole estate of the deceased if
such prayer is made by him, but no probate can be granted to a universal legatee in the absence
of appointment being made in the will either expressly or by necessarily implication.3A person
appointed as an executor by a will, cannot be burdened with the duties and obligations of an
executor, if he has not accepted the office of the executor.4
1Williams and Mortimer,Executors, Administrators and Probate, 16thedn., p. 16.2Inder Chand v. SAP Sabha, AIR 1977 Del 34.3Lallubhai Chhotabhai v. Vithakbhai Parshottambhai, AIR 1982 Guj 222.4Bakshiram v.. Lilan Devi, AIR 1960 Punj 231.
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
3/19
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
4/19
Only actions which are personal to the promisor e.g. promise to marry or which involve personal
skill or ability d not survive.
Order 31, rule 1 of the Code of Civil procedure in all suits concerning the property vested in an
executor or an administrator.
306. Demands and r ights of action of or against deceased sur vive to and against executor or
administrator.
This section lays down that all rights to prosecute or defend any actions or special proceedings
survive to and against his executors or administrators. The words executor and administrator
means person appointed by the court to administer the estate of the deceased person. The term
special proceedings covers summary proceedings under s.543 of the Indian Companies Act.
This section covers testamentary actions,8actions against a licensee,9actions in torts,10damages
for medical negligence,11
railway accident claim12
etc. The dictum in Peoples Bank v Desraj13
that the section is wide enough to include estate represented by heirs is wrong and was not
accepted by the court in the case of Official liquidatorvJugal Kishore14
.
In the 178th
Law commission report changes have been suggested to section 306 of the Indian
Succession Act. As per the Law Commission the section provides for the continuation of
proceedings by legal representatives of the injured upon his death. The commission relied upon
the decision of the Karnataka High Court in the case ofKanammav Dy. General Manager15
in
which the full bench recommended that the section should be so amended so as to permit the
survival of the right of the injured person to seek compensation to his legal representatives ,
irrespective of the fact that whether the death was related to the accident or not.
307. Power of executor or admini strator to dispose of property
Sub-s (1) Sub Section 1 provides the powers of the executors and the administrators in the case
when the deceased was a European, Parsi or an Indian Christian. An executor or administer has
8Pramanand Patel and Indu Patel v. Sudha Chowgule and Ors., 2008 (2) All MR 6949Ha Malbari (dead) by Lrs. v. Nasiruddin Pimuthmal & Ors., (1997) 8 SCC 5810Peoples Bank of Northern India Ltd. v. Hargopal, AIR 1936 Lah 27111Shri Aan Singh (dead) by Lrs. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors., 135 (2006) DLT 60412Arthamudi Ramu v. Union of India, 2008 ACJ 165913AIR 1935 Lah 70614AIR 1939 All 1151990(3) Kar Lj 605
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
5/19
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
6/19
308. General Powers of admini stration.-
Clause (a) Management of the estate The testator may respite confidence in the executor and
may confer upon him the rights to manage his property in a manner the testator would have
managed it. In the absence of any direction in the will as regards management, the executor has,
as a legal representative, power to incur expenditure for the proper management of the estate of
the deceased and to effect improvements which are reasonable and proper. If the property is in
disrepair he has the power to incur expenditure for such repairs. In all such acts with regard to
the management of the property entrusted to him, he must act with the same degree of care as a
man of ordinary prudence would in his own affairs.18
Clause (b) Expenses for improvement of property This clause permits the executor to incur
expenditure on such religious charitable and other objects, and on such improvements, with the
sanction of the High Court This clause was construed in Kali Kumar v. Rash Vehari Banerji.19
The court observed that the question of expenditure is not limited or qualified what is limited or
qualified are the religious charitable and other objects for the expenditure shall only be for
religious charitable and other objects. The question as to how is the reasonableness and propriety
of religious charitable and other objects are to be determined? The reasonableness and propriety
of the religious, charitable and other objects are to be determined with reference to the property.
309. Commission or agency charges.-
Ordinarily, a legal representative is not entitled to any allowance for his time and trouble he is
only entitled to out-of-pocket expenses. An executor or a trustee is not allowed any remuneration
as a rule especially when a legacy is given to him for his pains on the ground that he may not put
himself in a position in which his interests or duty may conflict.20
This section enables the executor or the administrator to stipulate for the payment of commission
within the limits laid down in the Administrator-General by or under the Administrator-General's
Act, 1913 (3 of 1913). The fee is charged under the rules framed under the Act. The percentage
18Lakhmichand v. kuvarbai, (1905) ILR 29 Bom 170.19(1974) 2 Cal 195-20420Burden v. Burden, (1813) 1 Ves & B 170.
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
7/19
is to be calculated on the income and not the corpus and on the value of the asset collected by
him and not on the net value of the assets.21
310. Purchase by executor or admini strator of deceased's property- This section is based on the
rule that a legal representative shall not derive any pecuniary benefit from his office. He may not
directly or indirectly purchase any portion of the assets for himself. It is further based on the
principle that an executor is bound to do everything in his power for the estate and is therefore
precluded from buying the assets, irrespective of undervalue or otherwise, because he nay there
by nr induced to neglect his duty.22
This rule debarring executor from purchasing any part of the
property indirectly or directly has been rested by the courts of equity on the public policy.23
This
shall be regarded as breach of trust without any inquiry.
Even if the sale is made to the executor by the order of the court the voidable nature of the
purchase remains.
311. Powers of several executors or admini strators exercisable by one.-
Where there are several executors the powers of all maybe exercised by any one of the, unless
there is anything to the contrary in the will.24
The Co- executors are considered as one person in
law, irrespective of their number. That is why the acts of one in respect of administration are
deemed to be the act of others unless the will states that they should act jointly Thus unless
specified they have a joint and entire authority over the property. Illustration (vi) to the section
shows that the powers of the executors can be restricted when the testator directs the two or more
of his executors to form a quorum. . There is no bar on the court to issue probate to any one of
them on the basis of the conduct of one of them disentitling to be named as such, with the other
executor. One of several executors may release a debt,25
renew a barred debt,26
settle an
account27
, surrender a legacy, assent to a legacy, sell the property, give a valid receipt or
discharge, endorse a promissory note etc.
21Watkin v Sarat Chander Ghose Moulicl (1904) ILR 31 Cal 57222Re Boles and British Land Co. [1902] 1 Ch 244, 246.23Brij Kishore Singh v Nazuk Bai AIR 1948 Cal 1924AIR 1921 Cal 29225Jacomb v. Harwood, (1751) 2 Ves Sen 26526Alamuri Sitaramasumani v. Sreenath Prativadi, (1922) 42 Mad LJ 55927Smith v Everett (1859) 27 Beav 446
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
8/19
312. Sur vival of powers on death of one of several executors or admini strators.
Upon the death of one of the several legal representatives in the office, with its incidents, duties,
powers, and the interest in all the property vested in them by virtue of their office, devolves upon
the survivors or survivor.
Where a special power or special direction is given to a particular executor personally by reason
of special confidence in him such power does not survive.28
313. Powers of administrator of effects unadministered:
Where all the people to whom a grant of probate or administration has been made have died
without completing administration and where, in the case of probate no claim of executor
continues, a grant is made to a new personal representative (administrator de bonis non) to
enable the administration of the estate to be completed.
This section enacts that an administrator de bonis non is entitled to all the properties which have
remained unadministered by the first executor or administrator, as he acquires the same power of
disposal as the original executor or administrator. If the original executor or administrator has
fraudulently alienated the property for his own use in collusion with the purchaser, such
propertied will be considered as unadministered and will pass to the administer de bonis nonwho
may apply to have the sale set aside.29
314. Powers of administrator during minority.-An administrator during minority has all the
powers of an ordinary administrator.
An administrator during minority has the same powers over the property of the minor as an
ordinary administrator. The limit of his administration is the minority of the person entitled to the
property; there is on other limit.
28Amrito Lall Dutt v. Surnomoye Dassee, (1897) ILR 24 Cal 589.29Cubbidge v. Bootwright, 1 Russ Ch Cas 549.
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
9/19
315. Powers of married executrix or administratrix.-When a grant of probate or letters of
administration has been made to a married woman, she has all the powers of an ordinary
executor or administrator.
This section is now superfluous having regard to the amendment made in ss. 223 and 236 by Act
18 of 1927. Previous to the Act, a grant could not be made to a married woman without the
previous consent of her husband. The powers of a married executrix or administratrix are the
same as any other executor administrator.
DUTIES OF AN EXECUTOR OR ADMINISTRATOR
The duties of an executor or administrator are given in sections 316 to 331 of the Act. These
duties range from personal to purely legal duties.
316. As to deceased's funeral.-
A man cannot dispose of his body by his will and after death the custody and possession of the
body belong to his executors until it is buried.30
If a man dies possessed of property, the duty of
burying his body falls on his legal representatives but it is the duty of the executor to give effect
to the wishes of the deceased and if the deceased has left no directions, the executor must dispose
of the body in the usual manner prevailing in the community and the caste to which the deceased
belonged.31
The deceased should be buried in a manner suitable to the estate he leaves behind and funeral
expenses according to the degree and quality of the deceased are allowed.32
The expenses are to
be allowed according to the directions in the will. If it is directed that the expenses should be
paid out of legacy and not out of general estate, then it is paid out of the legacy33
. Where the will
directs a particular amount to be expended on the funerals, up to that amount the executor can go
and not beyond. But if it appears that even that amount would mean clear extra valence, it is
30Williams v. Williams, (1882) 20 Ch D 659.31R v. Stewart, 12 Ad&El 773.32Nistarini v. Nandalal, 30 Cal 369.33Camini v. Adm-General of Madras (1906) ILR 29 Mad 290
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
10/19
within the discretion of the executor to expend less and ignore the direction in the will.34
The
executor is not bound to repay undertaken who gives credit to any person(stranger) who in turn
has given order as to the funeral. But if the person who gave the order for the funeral has paid for
the funeral, not voluntarily, he may have an action against the executor for reasonable
expenses.35
317. I nventory and account.-
It is the first duty of an accounting party, whether an agent, a trustee, a receiver or an executor
for, in this respect they all stand in the same position, to be constantly ready with the accounts.36
By this section a statutory obligation is placed upon the executors and administrators to exhibit
in court an inventory of all the property- movable and immoveable, and of all credits and debts
due to the estate of the deceased within six months from the date of grant without any
proceedings calling upon them to do so. An order for submitting inventory and account may be
passed after the grant is revoked.37
The section does not make it obligatory on the court to require an executor or administrator to
exhibit an inventory and account. It merely imposes a duty on the executor or administrator to do
so. If he does not do, so the court may require him to do so.38
If the person to whom the grant is
made wilfully or without reasonable cause omits to file an inventory and account when called
upon to do so, runs the risk of the grant being revoked. Igf he files a false inventory and account,
he will render himself liable to be prosecuted under sub-section 4.
318. I nventory to include property in any part of I ndia in certain cases.-
In the case of grant throughout the whole of India in addition to the requirements in s.317, the
inventory must show separately the property situated in each state and the approximate value of
such property. The probate duty will be assessed for the whole property according to the scale of
34Stag v. Punter, (1744) 3 Atk 119.35Green v. Salmons (1838) 8 A&E 34836Pearse v. Green, (1819) 1 Jac & W 135.37Re Thomas (deceased), [1959] 3 All ER 897.38Moola v. Moola, 35 IC 950.
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
11/19
the state in which the court is situated and not according to different scales prevailing in the
states where the properties are.39
319. As to property of, and debts owing to, deceased.-
This section lays down that it is the duty of the executor or administrator to collect and get the
property of the deceased as well as to collect his debts with due diligence. It would be dereliction
of duty if on account of undue delay in collecting the debt, the debt becomes time barred. In such
a case he is personally liable.40
He is also allowed to make investments in accordance with
authorization from the testator.41
In case where the residue is given for life with remainders over,
it is the duty of the executor in the absence of special provision to see that the fund is properly
invested. It is the duty of the executor to get in as speedily as possible all moneys of the deceased
remaining outstanding. The executor will be personally liable if he unduly delays in filing a suit
for recovery, which enables the debtor to avail the benefit of The Limitation Act. The executors
od not have the absolute duty to realise mortgages created by the deceased himself but they have
a discretion which they must exercise as practical men.
320. Expenses to be paid before all debts.-
Under s. 316 it is the duty of the legal representative to provide funds for the funeral expenses
out of the property left by the deceased. It is not the duty of the husband to provide funeral
expenses of wife, nor of the father for the funeral expenses of his son or daughter.42
If the legal
representatives so provides funds under this section, he gets priority for such payment over all
liabilities. If the will gives discretion to the executors, the court cannot fix any sum so long as the
discretion is properly and honestly exercised and the court will leave it to them to determine how
much be spent.43
The court grants reasonable amounts for funeral expenses having regard to the
status of the deceased and the value of the estate.
The funeral expenses, gives priority to payment of medical expenses of the deceased, boardingand lodging charges for one month prior to death.
39Re G. T. Williams, AIR 1924 Cal 115.40Howard v. Kinsey, ILR 12 Mad 573.41Wragg v. Palmer, [1919] 2 Ch 58.42Rees v. Huhes. [1946] KB 517.43Mawjibhai v. Mulpibhoy, 4 Bom LR 199.
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
12/19
321. Expenses to be paid next af ter such expenses.-
After the funeral expenses, medical expenses etc come a few other mandatory expenses, such as
(in order of payment)
a. The expenses of obtaining the grant which includes the probate duty and legal charges.The section does not declare a charge on the estate in favour of the lender who lends
money to the executor.44
b. The costs of judicial proceedings for the administration of the estate.Executorship expenses denote all expenses incidental to the proper performance of the duty of an
executor or administrator.
Cost of administration suit- The costs of the proceedings which were in their origin properly
directed for the benefit of the estate will be ordered to be paid out of the estate. Otherwise, as a
general rule, the costs of the proper parties, whose clain is a first charge on the property, are to be
defrayed before the claims of the persons beneficially entitled thereto are satisfied.
322. Wages for certain services to be next paid, and then other debts: The section is not
confined to the servants who actually work in the house but include other servants who would
ordinarily belong to an Indian household,with the exception of a tailor.45
A judgment debt takes
priority over other debts. But a creditor of the deceased who has obtained attachment on the
property of the judgement debtors property prior to the preliminary decree in an administration
suit is not entitled to priority over the other creditors.46
323. Save as afor esaid, al l debts to be paid equal ly and rateably
This section enjoins on the executors and administrators the duty of equal and rateable payments
of debts; it also declares that no creditors shall have priority over another.47
The executor has to
44Filix Joseph Sarpasadam & Ors. V. P. Rm. Sp. Subramania Chettiar, AIR 1937 Mad 484.45Banno v. Upendra, 8 Bom LR 244.46Gourgopal De Sarkar & Ors. V. Kamalkalika Datta & Ors., AIR 1934 Rang 3647Mathurdas Vassanji v. Raimal Hijri, AIR 1935 Bom 385
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
13/19
repay the debts exercising due diligence and therefore, despite there being no rule of law that it is
the duty of the executor to repay the debts within one year of death, due diligence may require
that payment be made within one year. On failure to repay within the year, the executor is called
upon to justify the delay.48
Creditors of ordinary debts shall not have any priority and the repayment must be done equally
and rateably. If the legal representative pays such debts as he knows of otherwise than equally
and rateably, he is personally liable to the creditor for improper distribution of the estate.
Creditors or their representatives who have the decree for the recovery of a judgement debt, the
executor or legal representative is bound to pay the full amount of the decree though there may
be other creditors and the assets may be insufficient to pay all in full.49
324. Application of moveable property to payment of debts where domicil e not in I ndia.
Sub-section 1 this sub-section is a counterpart to section 5(2) of the Act. It provides that
although succession to the movable property of a foreigner is governed by the law of domicile,
the application of such movable property in India for the payment of that persons debt in India
is to be regulated by the provisions of this Act.
Sub-section 2this sub-section lays down the mode of equitable distribution.
Sub-section 3this sub-section re-enacts the provisions of the probate and Administration Act
1881.
325. Debts to be paid before legacies.-Debts of every description must be paid before any
legacy.
This section lays down the rule of distribution that no legatee is entitled to anything until all the
debts left by the deceased are discharged. Debts of every description must be paid, viz., ordinary
debts, bond debts, judgement debts and mortgage debts. In case of contingent liabilities, the
48Re Tankard, Tankard v. Midland Bank [1942] Ch 69.49
Khusrubhai Nasarvanji v. Hormajsha Phirozsha(1892) 17 Bom 637
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
14/19
executor is not entitled to make provision for the payment of such liabilities, as they do not
constitute a debt until the contingency occurs.
326. Executor or administrator not bound to pay legacies without indemni ty.-
After the payment of all debts, the next in order of payment is the payment of legacies. This
section provides that before making any payment of legacies, the executor or administrator must
see whether there are any contingent liabilities, if there are, it is the duty of the legal
representative to make arrangement for such payment whenever they may become due. If he
distributes the property without regard to contingent liabilities, he will do so at his peril.
Beneficiaries, including legatees, are paid after taking sufficient indemnity from the
beneficiaries, with regard to any future liability to a contingent creditor. On the payment to a
contingent cresitor becoming due i.e on the happening of the contingency, the executor may
claim repayment of the sum which he has paid to the legatee.
327. Abatement of general legacies.
After the payment of debts, the legacies are to be paid and the order for payment of legacies is:
(a) Specific legacies(b) Demonstrative legacies; and(c) General legacies.If the estate is not sufficient to pay all the legacies in full; the general legacies abate pro rata in
the absence of a contrary direction by the testator. This section enacts that the executor has no
right to retain any money on account of legacy to himself or to any person for whom he is a
trustee, in priority to other general legatees. But if by express words or fair construction of the
will, the intention of the testator is clearly manifest to give one general legatee a priority over the
others, that intention must be given effect to. 50
50Re Marsh (1741) 2 Atk 171
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
15/19
328. Non-abatement of specif ic legacy when assets suf f icient to pay debts.-Where there is a
specific legacy and the assets are sufficient for the payment of debts and necessary expenses, the
thing specified must be delivered to the legatee without any abatement.
So long as the assets of the testator are sufficient to pay the debts and necessary expenses, it is
the duty of the executor to deliver the thing specifically bequeathed to the legatee without any
abatement. Apart from the deductions necessary for debts and expenses, a specific legacy must
be delivered to the legatee without any abatement.51
329. Righ t under demonstrative legacy when assets suf f icient to pay debts and necessary
expenses.-Where there is a demonstrative legacy, and the assets are sufficient for the payment of
debts and necessary expenses, the legatee has a preferential claim for payment of his legacy out
of the fund from which the legacy is directed to be paid until such fund is exhausted and if, after
the fund is exhausted, part of the legacy still remains unpaid, he is entitled to rank for the
remainder against the general assets as for a legacy of the amount of such unpaid remainder.
Demonstrative legacies are not liable to abate with general legacies so long as the fund out of
which they are directed to be paid is sufficient to pay such legacies. But when the fund is
exhausted and the legacies become payable out of general rates, such legacies are liable to abate
with the general legacies on a deficiency of assets, unless there is a direction to the contrary.52
330. Rateable abatement of specif ic legacies.-If the assets are not sufficient to answer the debts
and the specific legacies, abatement shall be made from the latter rateably in proportion to their
respective amounts.
So long as the assets are sufficient, a specific legacy is not subject to the rule of abatement. It is
only when the assets are not sufficient for payment of the debts and the executor is obliged to sell
the thing specifically bequeathed to discharge the debts that the doctrine of abatement is applied
to the specific legacy, any if there are several specific legacies they abate pro rata. Testatorbequeathing rent of specific property to his wife and daughters, bequest being specific is liable to
abatement in proportion to all of the rent of property.53
51Maherwan Jahangir v. Dhunbai Kavasha Mistry, AIR 1940 Mad 785.52Chinnam Rajamannar v.Tadikonda Ramachendra Rao, (1906) ILR 29 Mad155.53Bhagirathibai v. Adv-General Bombay, AIR 1937 Bom 384.
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
16/19
331. Legacies treated as general for purpose of abatement.-For the purpose of abatement, a
legacy for life, a sum appropriated by the will to produce an annuity, and the value of an annuity
when no sum has been appropriated to produce it, shall be treated as general legacies.
This section declares that a legacy for and annuity when no sum is appropriated to produce it, are
to be treated as general for the purposes of abatement and do not have any priority over general
legacies. On a deficiency of assets, they abate with the general legacies. But the whole of the
residue must first be exhausted.
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
17/19
RESTRICTIONS ON THE GENERAL POWERS CONFERRED AN EXECUTOR OR
ADMINISTRATOR
An executor or administrator has very extensive powers of management and disposition over the
property of the deceased. Section 307(1) of the Indian Succession Act confers on him the
powers todispose of the property of the deceased wholly or in part in such manner as he may
think fit.
Thus a purchaser or mortgagee dealing with the executor is not bound to enquire into facts
outside the will. If the will contains no restrictions on the statutory power of the executor the
alienation binds the beneficiaries under the will. The lender is not bound to enquire into the
circumstances existing prior to the testator's death to see whether the alienation is supported by a
justifying necessity. In Sunil Kumar v. Sisir Kumar, 1940 PC 30, Lord Thankerton observed: In
their Lordships opinion much of the Statutory power conferred by S. 307 on executors in India
would be nullified if such a duty of enquiry was imposed on parties dealing with executors.
Restrictions :- Where the deceased was a Hindu, a Mohammedan, Buddhists, Sikhs, or Jain, or
an Exempted person, the Statutory power is subject to the following restrictions :-(a) In the case
of executors :- The executor's power of disposal over immovable property may be restricted by
the will. The court granting probate may, however, by order in writing permit the executor to
dispose of in a particular manner though it is not warranted by the restrictions imposed by the
will.(b) In the case of administrators :- Previous permission of the court granting letters of
administration, is required for executing (i) Mortgage, charge, sale, gift of exchange or (ii) A
lease for a term exceeding five years.
Any alienation contrary to these restrictions is voidable at the instance of any other person
interested in the property.
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
18/19
LIABILITY OF AN EXECUTOR OR ADMINISTRATOR FOR LOSS OCCASIONED
BY HIM TO THE ESTATE:
The liability of the executor or administrator arises in two sets of cases:
Devastatavit: Deavastation consists in misapplication of the estate of the deceased or subjecting
to loss or damage. Suppose the executor pays a non- existent spurious debt out of the estate. It is
a case of devastav it.
Other such cases are :-
(a)Neglecting to renew a renewable lease.
(b) Neglecting to terminate a non-profitable lease, which is terminable on notice.
Neglecting to realize part of the estate: The executor or administrator is liable also for failure to
get in part of the property of the estate. Thus if he does not collect a debt or collects only a part
of it from a debtor who is able to pay in full or allows a debt to become barred by time, he is
liable to make good the loss caused to estate thereby.
ExecutorDe Son Tort (of his own wrong)
An executor de son tort means an executor of his wrong. Under S. 303 a person becomes such
an executor in the following circumstances:
(i) There is no rightful executor (or administrator ) in existence and a person does anyact which belongs to the office of executor. Then he becomes an executor de son tort.
Suppose A sues as executor of the deceased though he is not the executor. Such an act
appertains to the office of executor. So A is an executor of his wrong.
(ii) A person intermeddles with the estate of the deceased when there is no executor orthe administrator, then he becomes an Executor de son tort. Suppose A sells some of
the goods of the deceased. This makes him an executorde son tort. Thus if A has sold
the goods of the deceased in the ordinary course of business he does not become an
executor of his own wrong i.e. Wrongful act. Suppose during his lifetime B appoints
A his agent to sell his goods. After B's death, A not knowing about it continues to sell
B's Goods. This does not make A an executor of his own wrong. But if he comes to
-
8/12/2019 powers of executors
19/19
know of B's death(whereby the agency is terminated) and still continues to sell B's
goods, A becomes an executor of his wrong.
A person who intermeddles with the estate of the descendants so becomes an executor de son tort
incurs a liability to the extent of the assets, which have come into his hands. He can take credit
for:
(i) the payments made to the rightful executor or administrator, and(ii) the payments made in due course of administration. This liability can be enforced by:the
rightful executor of administrator; creditor of the deceased or legatee of the deceased (S.
304).
Relying upon the SC judgment, the Delhi High Court Held in Klaus Mittelbachert v. East Hotels
Ltd.54, considered the question under S. 306 of the Indian Succession Act whether the action
damages for personal injuries would abate on the death of the plaintiff. It was held that if the
action for damages is purely based upon a tort the action would abate; but if it is based upon a
contract it will survive to the executors and administrators.
AdministratorDe Bonis Non
Section 258 of the Indian Succession Act provides for the grant of administration de bonis non in
the case of a person dying testate. If the executor to whom the probate has been granted dies
before the administration of the estate, a new representative is appointed for the purpose of
administering such of the estate as remains unadministered. Such a representative is called the
Administrator de bonis non.
For the grant of administration de bonis non there should be a part of the original testator's estate
remaining un-administered. Suppose the funeral and testamentary expenses have been paid, all
the legatees are satisfied and the surplus of the estate is invested in authorised securities. In such
a case, there is nothing left to administer. The executor in fact sheds his character as executor
and becomes a trustee. Even if he dies there is no scope for appointing an administrator de bonis
non. This is because for a grant de bonis non a part of the original testator's estate should remain
un-administered.
54AIR 1997 Del 201