PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs....
Transcript of PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs....
![Page 1: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
A. "Women are more risk averse than men.”
B. "In our sample, we found a statistically significant difference in mean risk aversion between men and women using the [name of elicitation procedure], with women on average being more risk averse."
![Page 7: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
References: INET: “Are Women Really More Risk Averse than Men?” INET working paper (2012)
JES: “Are Women Really More Risk Averse than Men?”
Journal of Economic Surveys 29(3), July 2015 JEM: “The Power of Stereotyping and Confirmation Bias to
Overwhelm Accurate Assessment: The Case of Economics, Gender, and Risk Aversion.” Journal of Economic Methodology 21(3), 2014.
FE: “Not-So-Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking” Feminist Economics, forthcoming.
![Page 9: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
100%
Women Men
Detectable with n = 2!
*Only two categories are allowed!
![Page 11: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
100%
Number of Y chromosomes per cell
Women Men
0 1
![Page 12: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
100% Women Men
Short Hair
Long Hair
![Page 13: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Women
Men
![Page 14: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Women Men
Hair Length (in cm)
![Page 15: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
“Our fMRI results provide support for involvement of medial PFC regions, including anteromedial PFC and the rostral ACC, while participants made sterotypic associations about gender or race. In contrast, dorsolateral PFC structures were recruited when participants were required to inhibit these well-learned associations about gender and race.” Knutson, Mah, Manly, and Grafman,
“Neural Correlates…” (2007)
![Page 18: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• “Essences” are a priori, mentally created beliefs, not statistical facts.
• To add to beliefs about “essential” natures, all it takes is n=2!*
*Prentice and Miller, "Essentializing Differences Between Women and Men." Psychological Science, 2006.
![Page 25: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
A. "Women are more risk averse than men.”
As a bald, generic statement, this is likely to be taken as confirmation of a gender “essence” (whether the researcher intends this or not).
![Page 26: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
1. There is variation within each gender, as well as across gender
2. The distributions overlap, showing some degree of similarity.
3. The distributions also have some degree of difference, measurable as a difference in an aggregate statistic (usually the mean).
4. The measured difference does not apply to individuals: One cannot accurately predict behavior from an individual’s gender, or gender from behavior.
Women Men
![Page 29: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
B. "In our sample, we found a statistically significant difference in mean risk aversion between men and women using the [name of elicitation procedure], with women on average being more risk averse."
![Page 30: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Effect size (Cohen’s d) where
Cohen (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
![Page 32: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
d ≅ 0.35
d ≅ 2.60 (e.g. heights)
![Page 33: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Index of Similarity
Nelson, INET 2012, and JES 2015
![Page 37: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
IS = 1 – ½(|.37-.33|+|.63-.67|) = 1- 0.04 = .96
![Page 38: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Example: d ≈ .4, IS ≈ .7
Nelson, JES 2015. Data from Beckmann and Menkhoff (2008)
![Page 39: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Meta-analysis of 35 articles on gender and risk preference and perception (a representative subset shown here) (Nelson, INET 2012 and JES, 2015)
![Page 40: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Meta-Analysis of 37 studies (contained in 15 articles or papers) using the “Investment Game” (Nelson, FE, forthcoming)
![Page 41: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Steve
Jane Steve
Jane
Jane Steve
![Page 44: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Women
Men
![Page 45: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
![Page 46: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
![Page 47: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
• Differences were only statistically significant in 1 out of 4 countries studied.
• But article concludes “a victory for gender difference” and “robust gender differences,” with a suggestion that female investors be paired with female investment advisors.
Example #1: In a single study
![Page 48: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Stanley and Doucouliagos (2010). “Picture This…” Journal of Economic Surveys
Precision
Magnitude
A tool: Meta-Analysis and the Funnel Diagram
![Page 49: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
![Page 50: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Precision
Magnitude
Stanley and Doucouliagos (2010)
![Page 51: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Example #2 Meta-Analysis (Nelson, JEM 2015) of subset of 18 publications (Economics and risk preference only) from JES study
![Page 52: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Nelson, JEM, 2015
![Page 53: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Example #3:Meta-Analysis (Nelson, FE, forthcoming), 35 studies contained in 15 articles from “Strong Evidence for Gender Difference in Risk Taking,” Charness and Gneezy, 2012, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
![Page 54: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
![Page 55: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Nelson, FE, Forthcoming
![Page 56: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
![Page 57: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
![Page 58: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
![Page 59: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Study Comparison d
Carr and Steele, 2010 : Females only: no stereotype threat vs. threat
.68 to 1.05
Meier-Pesti and Penz, 2008 Males only: masculinity-primed vs. femininity-primed NSS to .91
Ronay and Kim, 2006 Males only: with same-sex
discussion vs. without .58 to 1.16
Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74
![Page 60: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect" for risk perception,” 2012
![Page 61: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
![Page 62: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
![Page 63: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
![Page 64: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
= Belief
= Evidence
![Page 65: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
![Page 66: PowerPoint Presentation€¦ · Weaver, Vandello, et al., 2012 ; Males only: gender threat vs. gender affirmation .57 to .74 ; Dan Kahan, “Checking in on the "white male effect"](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050506/5f9770adfea3d34cee165fb1/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)