Power and Conflict in Consumer Product Channels. Vendor Rewards Rewards can be realized in retailer...
-
Upload
emily-leonard -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Power and Conflict in Consumer Product Channels. Vendor Rewards Rewards can be realized in retailer...
Power and Conflict in Consumer Product Channels
Vendor Rewards
• Rewards can be realized in retailer gross margins
• Protection from competition– Exclusive territories, protection from
competition– Unique products/exclusive distribution
• Trade promotion/deals– Trade discounts– Cooperative advertising
• Information on retail competitors
Retailer rewards
• “Category Management Privilege”
• Display space for an item– Intra-brand adjacencies on shelf/store– Location in store, visibility– Cooperation on promotional display
• Information on competing manufacturers
• Information on consumer purchasing
Retailer Coercion, Coercive Power
• Dropping/de-listing a product, product line
• Reducing display space
• Poorer display space, comparative display
Evidence of retailer coercive power in vendor concessions
• Unique SKUs– Sam’s Club SKUs, “variety flats”
• Slotting allowances
• Appearance in-store specials, undistributed print materials
Vendor Coercion?
• Full-line forcing, tying arrangements, minimum resale prices—are all illegal.
• Discontinuing as a distributor (usually spelled out in contractual agreements), seldom attempted in administered channels.
• Supplier has little, if any, coercive power
Expertise
• B’s perception that A has special knowledge, skills, experiences
• Examples:– Category management– Superior consumer research– Retailer pricing– Retailing costs and assignment of costs
Referent/Identification
• Consistency in brands, approaches to brand management, target customers– Porsche/BMW and U.S. import dealers network– Clothing designers and more prestigious
department stores
Legitimate
• Traditional power, usually grounded in the laws and customs:– Resale price maintenance– Exclusivity of territories– Non-competition clauses
• Tradition, religious origins, cultural origins– “Honor thy father and mother”– Inferiority of the hireling– Markup is an unethical behavior
Conflict and interdependence
• When a channel member perceives the behavior of another to be impeding the attainment of its goals or the effective performance of its instrumental behavior patterns
• “Voice” versus “Exit”: Channel member will either express felt conflict or leave the channel.
• Goal Incongruence
• Domain Dissensus
• Differing Perceptions of Reality– Differing perceptions of retail management
Conflict Types
Goal Incongruity
• Suppose: – The retailer’s goal is to maximize the sale of
manufacturer’s line– The supplier’s goal was to maximize the profitability of
its retailers
• However—just the opposite is true:– The retailer’s goal is to maximize it’s profitability and
satisfy the needs of the local market.– The manufacturer’s goal is to maximize market share
and profitability of its brands.
Actions affecting goals
• Procter & Gamble going to EDLP with distributors
• No more inside margin for grocery wholesalers
• Suppliers adding distributors
Domain Dissensus
• The large customer and vertical competition
• Influencing the retailer’s operation
• Retailer requesting unique products, changes in production, packaging.
• Retailer influencing advertising
Differing perceptions of reality
• Ignorance of the other channel member’s – Responsibilities, – Roles, – Priorities
• Discounting the other channel member’s – Sophistication,– Knowledge,– Experiences
Economic sourcesInherent Conflict
• Nature of costs
• Fixed costs
• Marginal costs, variable costs
Conflict Episodes
• Minor exchanges, requests• Denials of requests• Actions affecting competitors• Actions affecting directly affecting margins
(removal of deals)• Actions directly affecting volume (denying
a product)• Vertical competition
Dysfunctional conflict
• Anti-competitive practices– Shifting business between competitors
• Lawsuits– Point of no return
Conflict resolution
• Exchange of members
• Membership in trade associations
• Third-party arbitration
• Purchase
• Civil lawsuits