Potential of Sweet Potato and Sweet Sorghum as Advanced Biofuel

22
Potential of Sweet Potato and Sweet Sorghum as Advanced Biofuel Crops for Low Input Production on Small Farms Michael Bomford and Tony Silvernail

Transcript of Potential of Sweet Potato and Sweet Sorghum as Advanced Biofuel

Potential of

Sweet Potato and

Sweet Sorghum

as Advanced

Biofuel Crops for

Low Input

Production on

Small Farms

Michael Bomford

and Tony Silvernail

US Biofuel Mandates

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022

Billion

gallons

advanced biofuel

cellulosic biofuel

conventional biofuel

Energy Independence and Security

Act of 2007, Section 202

US Biofuel Mandates

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022

Billion

gallons

advanced biofuel

cellulosic biofuel

conventional biofuel

Conventional biofuel:

Ethanol derived from corn

starch

Energy Independence and Security

Act of 2007, Section 202

US Biofuel Mandates

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022

Billion

gallons

advanced biofuel

cellulosic biofuel

conventional biofuel

Energy Independence and Security

Act of 2007, Section 202

Cellulosic biofuel:

Renewable fuel derived from any

cellulose, hemicellulose, or lignin that is

derived from renewable biomass and that

has lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions

that are at least 60 percent less than the

baseline

US Biofuel Mandates

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022

Billion

gallons

advanced biofuel

cellulosic biofuel

conventional biofuel

Energy Independence and Security

Act of 2007, Section 202

Advanced biofuel:

Renewable fuel, other than ethanol

derived from corn starch, that has

lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions that

are at least 50 percent less than

baseline

Small, organic, sustainable

• Smaller farms tend to use land more efficiently

• Organic farms tend to use energy more

efficiently

– Synthetic fertilizers and pesticides can account for 30-

50% of energy involved in grain production

• Need alternative feedstock crops

– Compatible with small farms, organic farms, southern

farms

– Higher ethanol yield than corn

– Compatible with decentralized processing

Small farms are

more productive

Production per unit area

Syria

Sudan

Uganda

Tanzania

Nigeria

Ethiopia

Peru

Barbados

Bangladesh

India

Myanmar

Nepal

S. Korea

Thailand

Cornia, Giovanni Andrea. 1985. "Farm Size, Land Yields and the Agricultural

Production Function: An Analysis for Fifteen Developing Countries." World

Development 13(4):513-534.

“Because of its reduced energy inputs, organic

agriculture is the ideal production method for

biofuels.

[…]

As the aim of biofuels is to reduce dependency on

non-renewable energy sources and to mitigate

environmental damage of fossil fuel emissions,

organic production of biofuels furthers these goals

in a way that conventional agriculture does not.”

Ziesemer 2007, UN-FAO

Objectives

• Compare sweet sorghum and sweet potato to

corn in terms of

– Potential ethanol yield (land use efficiency)

– Energy use efficiency

– Labor use efficiency

• Compare efficiencies at three small organic farm

scales

– Biointensive

– Market garden

– Small farm

Crops

Image

EthanolEthanolBiodieselEthanolFuel

Sweet

potato

Sorghum

syrup, grain

Edamame,

grain

Sweet

corn, grain

Food

Ipomoea

batatas

Sorghum

bicolor

Glycine

max

Zea

mays

Latin name

Sweet

potato

Sweet

sorghumSoybeanCorn

Common

name

Small Farm Scales

• Biointensive– Human-powered; no fossil fuels

– Smallest scale

• Market garden– Walk-behind tractor is largest fossil fuel powered machine

• Small farm– Conventional4-wheeled tractors

Biointensive mini-farming

“Biointensive mini-farming

techniques make it possible to

grow food using

– 99% less energy in all forms -

human and mechanical,

– 66-88% less water, and

– 50-100% less fertilizer, compared

to commercial agriculture.

They also produce two to six

times more food and build the

soil.”

John Jeavons. 1995. Cultivating our Garden.

http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC42/Jeavons.htm

Rep 1

Rep 2

Rep 3

Rep 4

Corn

Soybean

Sweet potato

Sweet sorghum

Food

Fuel

Food

Fuel

Food

Fuel

Small

farmMarket

gardenBio-

intensive

Small

farm

Small

farm

Small

farm

Market

garden

Market

garden

Market

garden

Bio-

intensive

Bio-

intensive

Bio-

intensive

N50 m

38 m

22 m

18 m

7 m

6 m3.4 m

2008

0.1

1

10

Fres

h ed

amam

eDry

soy

bean

Fres

h sw

eet c

orn

Dry

gra

in c

orn

Fres

h sw

eet p

otat

oDal

e so

rghu

mM

81E

sorg

hum

Yield (kg/m2,

log scale)

Biointensive

Market Garden

Small Farm

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Biointensive Market garden Small farm

Energy use

(MJ/m2)

+ S.E.

Metabolic energy

Fuel energy

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

24

27

30

Biointensive Market garden Small farm

Labor use

(min/m2)

+ S.E.

Theoretical EtOH yield

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Corn Dale M81E Sweet potato

Theoretical

EtOH yield

(l/ha)

Biointensive

Market Garden

Small Farm

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Theoretical EtOH

yield

(mL/min)

Biointensive

Market Garden

Small Farm

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Corn Dale M81E Sweet potato

Theoretical

EtOH yield

(mL/MJ)

Biointensive

Market Garden

Small Farm

Eout/Ein

40

0

10

20

30

Conclusions

• Yields under low input, small-scale organic production systems– Field corn about 33% below average

– Sweet potato about average

– Sweet sorghum about 50% higher than average

• Field corn and sweet sorghum yields lower in Biointensive-scale system; sweet potato yields similar across scales

• Biointensive scale gives highest energy efficiency; small farm gives highest land and labor use efficiency

• Sweet sorghum and sweet potato more compatible with low-input small farm systems than corn

Thanks to

• Harold Benson

• Kimberley Holmes

• Robert Barney

• John Rodgers

• Joelle Johnson

• Brian Geier

• KSU Farm crew

• CASS program

• Post Carbon Institute

Contact:

Michael Bomford

502-597-5752

[email protected]

Learn more:

EnergyFarms.net

Organic.KYSU.edu