POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF (ADVANCED) · PDF file45 Elimination of pharmaceutical residues...
Transcript of POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF (ADVANCED) · PDF file45 Elimination of pharmaceutical residues...
Titelmasterformat durch Klicken bearbeiten
Torsten C. Schmidt, Holger Lutze
POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF (ADVANCED) OXIDATION PROCESSES
IN WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Cairo, February 19, 2013
Outline
Introduction/Overview of Oxidative Processes
Examples of our Recent Work: Lab Scale: Mechanistic Investigations with
Probe Compounds: Degradation of Micropollutants
Pilot Scale: Implementation of Ozonation in Drinking Water Treatment
(Full Scale: Advanced Treatment of Wastewater Effluents)
Conclusions and Outlook
Use of Oxidation Processes in Water
Treatment
Advantages:
• Constant process performance
• No disposal of concentrates or solids
(compared with AC sorption or membrane filtration)
Areas of Use:
• Drinking water
– Disinfection, Decolorization, Fe(II) and
Mn(II) Removal, Micropollutant Elimination
• Municipal wastewater
– Disinfection, Further elimination of micropollutants
• Industrial wastewater
• High purity industrial process waters
Important Considerations in Oxidative
Treatment Processes
Pollutants Oxidation CO2, H2O
Lifetime
Mechanisms
Kinetics
Transformation
products
Biodegradability
D Toxicological
effects
Scavenging by matrix
components
Possible loss of efficiency,
Oxidation byproducts
Prediction of
elimination based
on properties
possible?
Oxidation
Modified after U. von Gunten, eawag
Energy Demand/Carbon Footprint?
Estrogen Receptor
Effect? Effect
Oxidation
Estrogenically active compound
Effect of Oxidative Transformation:
Reduction of Estrogenicity
Transformation product
binds? binds
Modified after U. von Gunten, eawag
17b-Estradiole (E2)
Reduction of estrogenicity is proportional to
concentration decline of EE2
Lee et al. 2008
Reduction of Estrogenic Effects (EEEQ) of 17a-
Ethinylestradiole by Oxidative Processes
dose, M
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Rel
ativ
e E
E2
or
EE
EQ
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Relative EE20.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Rel
ativ
e E
EE
Q
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Chlorine
dose, M
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Bromine
Relative EE20.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Rel
ativ
e E
EE
Q
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
dose, M
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Ozone
Relative EE20.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Rel
ativ
e E
EE
Q
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
UV fluence, mJ/cm2
0 100 200 300 4000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
OH radical
Relative EE20.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Rel
ativ
e E
EE
Q
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
dose, M
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Chlorine dioxide
Relative EE20.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Rel
ativ
e E
EE
Q
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
dose, M
0 10 20 30 40
Ferrate
Relative EE20.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Rel
ativ
e E
EE
Q
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1
r2 = 0.96 r
2 = 0.99
1 1
r2 = 0.99
1
r2 = 0.99
1
r2 = 0.99
1
r2 = 0.99
Rel
ativ
e E
E2
or
EE
EQ
EE2
EEEQ
Modified after U. von Gunten, eawag 17a-Ethinylestradiole (EE2)
Oxidation + Biological Filtration:
Reduction of Toxic Effects in Whole Effluents
• Data from WWTP Regensdorf, CH:
Adapted from S. Zimmermann, EPFL
Elimination by ozonation and slow sand filtration in %
Bioluminescence
suppression
Acetylcholinesterase
suppression
Algae test
(photosynthesis)
Algae test
(growth)
YES Assay
Overview Advanced Oxidation Processes
UV based Ozone based H2O2 based
UV/H2O2
UV/O3
O3/H2O2
No Chemicals
O3/AC
Ozonation
Fenton Ultrasound
UV/TiO2
H2O+Ultrasound OH +H
H2O + VUV(120-160nm) OH +H
2O3 + HO2- 2OH +3O2
O3 + AC OH + O2
O3 + (OH-, NOM) OH
H2O2 + UVC 2 OH (F = 1)
O3+UVC H2O2 OH+O2
TiO2 + hn h+ + e- OH + O2-
Vacuum UV (VUV)
OH- yield: 50%
[Jarocki et al., in prep.]
H2O2
Fe(II) Fe(III)
OH
H2O2 HO2
[Fe(III)HO2]2+
Also direct
photolysis
pH < 4
BrO3-
NDMA
Comparison of Advanced Oxidative
Processes
UV based Ozone based H2O2 based
UV/H2O2(TiO2)
UV/O3
O3/H2O2
No Chemicals
O3/AC
Ozonation
Fenton Ultrasound
Energy demand
Vacuum UV
Loss of oxidation efficiency via matrix scavenging, assimilable organic carbon
formation, unknown transformation products
Negative Effects
Br- HOBr/OBr-
BrO3-
O3
O3/•OH
H2O2
Br-
Describing Pollutant Removal
Oxidant
No. of publ.
kinetic const.
k (ca. 2008)
Ozone ~ 500
OH Radicals ~ 2000
Chlorine ~ 300
Chlorodioxide ~ 100
Ferrate(VI) ~ 50
)
d Pk ox P
dt =
)0
lnP
k ox tP
=
Typical second order kinetic
constants for a pollutant P:
pH, T!
Quantification oxidant exposure:
• Matrix dependent
• Dosage dependent
• Consideration of secondary oxidants
Determination kinetic constants:
• Direct measurements
• Indirect measurements (Competition kinetics)
• Quantitative structure activity relationships (QSARs)
• Estimation from similar oxidants
Modified after U. von Gunten, eawag
Mechanistic Investigations
Degradation of Micropollutants:
Example Diclofenac
N
HOOCCl
Cl
H
O3
N
HOOCCl
Cl
H
O3
Possible sites of ozone attack
Diclofenac (Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug)
Ref.: Sein et al. (2008), Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 6656
Degradation of Micropollutants:
Example Diclofenac
Ref.: Sein et al. (2008), Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 6656
CH2
C O OH
N
Cl
Cl
H
O
O
O
CH2
C O OH
N
Cl
Cl
H
O3
CH2
C O OH
N
Cl
Cl
- O3
- H+
.
O3 + H2O OH + O2 + OH
([Diclofenac]0 = 50 µM) ■ Diclofenac ■ Iminoquinone (major intermediate) ■ 2,6-Dichloroaniline
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 50 100 150 200 250
[Ozone] / µM
[Dic
lofe
na
c]
an
d [
Pro
du
cts
] / µ
M
N
O
Cl
Cl
CH2
COOH
Ref.: Sein et al. (2008), Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 6656
Diclofenac Degradation in Presence of t-BuOH
Suggested Reaction Mechanism for the
Formation of the Iminoquinone Intermediate
CH2
N
Cl
Cl
.CO2H
O3 / - O2
CH2
N
Cl
Cl.
CO2H
OH
CH2
N
Cl
Cl.
CO2H
HO
CH2
N
Cl
Cl.
CO2H
O2
HOOO
- HO2
CH2
N
Cl
Cl
CO2H
O
1,2 H-shift
Iminoquinone
Ref.: Sein et al. (2008), Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 6656
Pilot-Scale Study
• Provides drinking water for ca. 80% of the
population of Luxemburg
• The drinking water treatment plant was
build up in 1969
• Modernization of treatment and increase
of water production to 100’000 m3/d
planned
SEBES
Surface area: 3,8 km2 Capacity: 60 Mill. m3
SEBES Syndicat des Eaux du Barrage
d'Esch-sur-Sûre
Raw Water
Postozonation
pH Adjustment/Flocculation
Membrane Filtration
Preozonation
pH Adjustment/Flocculation
Membrane Filtration
Biological Filtration
Simplified Scheme of the Pilot Plant
Pilot Study SEBES
Accompanying Lab Studies:
Ozone Scavenging
Ozone half life time vs. ozone dose preozonation (RW O3), postozonation (UF O3) and AOP O3/H2O2 (UF AOP)
206
402
573
701
26
230260
523
63 57 58 46
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1 2 3 5
t[s]
c(O3) [mg/l]
RW O3
UF O3
UF AOP
0
0,005
0,01
0,015
0,02
0,025
0,03
1 2 3 4 5
Ozo
ne e
xp
osu
re [
M×
s]
c(O3) [mg/L]
RW O3
UF O3
UF AOP
Accompanying Lab Studies:
Disinfection Efficiency
Ozone exposure vs. ozone dose; preozonation (RW O3), postozonation (UF O3) and AOP O3/H2O2 (UF AOP); reaction time 500 s, DOC: raw water 2 mg/L, UF filtrate 1 mg/L, alkalinity: 0.4 mM, pH: 7
99% inactivation
B. subtilis spores
Accompanying Lab Studies:
Bromate Formation Potential
Bromate formation vs. ozone dose, c(Br-): 20 µg/L, complete ozone depletion, preozonation (RW O3), postozonation (UF O3) and AOP O3/H2O2 (UF AOP), DOC: RW 2 mg/L, UF 1 mg/L, Alkalinity: 0.4 mM, pH: 7
Bromate TLV
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 2 3 5
c(B
rO3
- )[µ
g/l]
c(O3) [mg/l]
RW O3
UF O3
UF AOP
Bromate drinking water standard
Design of Postozonation
Design of Postozonation
PN 2
PN 3
PN 1
H2O2
Q = 1 m3/h
c(O3) = 1, 3, 5 mg/L
c(H2O2) = ca. c(O3)
Reaction time = 10 min
0102030405060708090
100
Raw water Flocculation/UF UF O3 AC filter
Re
sid
ua
l c
on
c. in
%Pilot: Micropollutant Elimination
Bentazone MTBE
Dichlorobenzamide
Diclofenac
Carbamazepine
Sulfadiazine
Ozon dose UF O3 1 mg/L O3, PN 3
kO3: < 10, 700, > 103 M-1s-1
Pilot: Micropollutant Elimination
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1 2 3 4
Co
nc
en
tra
tio
n [
µg
/l]
Sampling point
No transformation of Chlorthalonil M12 by O3 or •OH
S OO
OH
NH2
O
Cl
ClCl
N
PN1 PN2 PN3 Complete ozone consumption
AOP O3/H2O2 , O3 4 mg/L, H2O2 17 mg/L DOC 1 mg/L, Alkalinity: 0.4 mM, pH: 7
Summary of Pilot Study
(Preozonation)
Intermediate disinfection
Intermediate oxidation efficiency
Bromate formation at high ozone doses
O3
Flocculation + UF
O3
(Postozonation)
Good disinfection
Lowered oxidation efficiency
Increased bromate formation
O3 + H2O2
(Post AOP)
Poor disinfection
High oxidation efficiency
Bromate formation can be controlled
Reservoir
Synergy via switch between two modi
Disinfection modus Oxidation modus
Full-Scale Implementation
45
Elimination of pharmaceutical residues in
municipal wastewater treatment plants
(WWTP: Schwerte, Bad Sassendorf & Duisburg-Vierlinden)
Institut für Siedlungswasserwirtschaft und Abfalltechnik
Lehrstuhl für Siedlungswasser- wirtschaft und Umwelttechnik
Abteilung für Hygiene, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin
Project management: Dr. Thomas Grünebaum (Ruhrverband, Essen)
Research projects „Reine Ruhr“
Final report: http://www.lanuv.nrw.de/wasser/abwasser/forschung/abwa
sser.htm
Elimination of Selected Target Compounds in Large Scale WWTP
2 mg Ozone/L, zspec = 0.36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Elim
inati
on
[%
]
n.d.
© Jochen Türk, IUTA
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Elim
ina
tio
n [
%]
5 mg Ozone/L, zspec = 0.91
Take-home Messages
Oxidative Processes can be used to meet (additional)
goals of water and wastewater treatment
Optimized technical use requires a profound
understanding of chemistry of oxidant species
including formation of oxidation byproducts
For micropollutant elimination detailed knowledge of
transformation reaction is needed but enormous
effort needed
Comprehensive economical and effect-orientied
evaluations are still largely lacking
Acknowledgements
• Current and Previous Coworkers in Oxidative Processes: Alexandra Jarocki, Alexandra Beermann, Maike Cyris, Agnes Tekle-Rötering, Sebastian Kowal, Alaa Salma, Myint Sein, Clemens von Sonntag, Jochen Türk, numerous students
• Collaborators: Urs von Gunten, Georges Kraus, Jean-Paul Lickes, Stefan Panglisch, André Tatzel
• Funding: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, BMWi/AiF, BMBF, Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, Wasserchemische Gesellschaft, EU MC-ITN ATWARM
ANAKON 2011, Zürich Wasser 2012, Neu-Ulm