Poster 150 Obesity Misclassification and Cardiometabolic Risk in Adults with Functional Mobility...
Transcript of Poster 150 Obesity Misclassification and Cardiometabolic Risk in Adults with Functional Mobility...
e64 Other
Participants: 16 subjects, 23-59 years, divided into Group I (diabetic) and
Group II (control).
Interventions: To measure the bite force a digital dynamometer (model
IDDKkratos)waspositioned in the region of the firstmolars (left and right) and
threemeasurements were madewith an interval of twominutes between them.
Main Outcome Measures: Three measurements were made with an interval
of two minutes between them.
Results: It was found that there was statistically significant difference
between the groups (p <0.05). Patients with diabetes had lower bite force
values on both sides as compared with the control group, and this finding
was statistically significant (p <0.01).
Conclusions: These results show that diabetes influences the bite force.
This finding is clinically relevant because most diabetics experience
considerable tooth loss over time, and this should be taken into account
during the oral rehabilitation process.
Key Words: Maximal bite force, diabetics, stomatognatic sistem, EMG
Disclosure: Simone Regalo has nothing to disclose. Financial support:
FAPESP 2012/00928-0 e 2012/00897-8; Protocol No CEP:
2011.1.1162.58.9
Poster 150
Obesity Misclassification and Cardiometabolic Risk in Adults withFunctional Mobility Impairment: NHANES 2003-2006
Mark Peterson (University of Michigan), Soham Al Snih
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to estimate the degree of obesity
misclassification and cardiometabolic risk among adults with chronic
motor impairments.
Design: Cross-sectional.Setting: In-person interview and physical examination, from the combined
2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES) datasets.
Participants: Representative sample of 852 individuals, aged 20-85 years,
reporting at least one major functional limitation related to mobility or
lower body function.
Intervention: BMI, percent body fat (%BF) determined by dual energy X-
ray absorptiometry (DXA) and established markers of insulin sensitivity,
lipid profile and cardiovascular risk were analyzed.
Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the performance of BMI
as a continuous variable, as well as various specific BMI thresholds to
detect obesity defined by %BF.
Results: 41% of subjects classified as “lean” and 98% of individuals classi-
fied as “overweight” according to BMI had a %BF within the obesity range.
The BMI cutoff for obesity had excellent specificity in both men (100%) and
women (98.4%), but poor sensitivity (<55%). The optimal threshold for BMI
to detect obese %BF was 25kg$m-2 for both sexes. Each component of car-
diometabolic risk and the metabolic syndrome were robustly associated with
%BF, even after adjusting for age, gender, and sociodemographic factors.
Conclusions: Obesity misclassification and cardiometabolic risk is prev-
alent among individuals with motor impairment, and thus diagnostic
screening for obesity should be modified in mobility-impaired populations.
Key Words: Obesity, body composition, mobility impairment, abdominal
adiposity, metabolic syndrome.
Disclosure: Mark Peterson has nothing to disclose.
Poster 151
The Self-Report Fecal Incontinence and Constipation Questionnaire(FICQ) in Patients with Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Seeking OutpatientRehabilitation
Ying-Chih Wang (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)
Objective: To perform a psychometric analysis of the Fecal Incontinence
and Constipation Questionnaire (FICQ) in patients seeking outpatient
rehabilitation services due to pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and to develop
an Item Response Theory (IRT)-based item bank suitable for computerized
adaptive testing (CAT) application for this patient population.
Design: Cross-sectional data analysis. We assessed a 20-item FICQ for
unidimensionality and local independence, differential item functioning
(DIF), item fit, item hierarchical structure, and test precision using IRT
partial credit model.
Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation.Participants: 644 patients (mean age 52, SD 16, min 18, max 91) being
treated for their PFD in 64 outpatient rehabilitation clinics in 20 states (USA).
Interventions: NAMain Outcome Measure(s): FICQResults: Factor analyses supported the two-factor subscales as original
defined: items related to either leakage or constipation severity. Removal
of two items improved unidimensionality and local independence. Among
remaining items, two items were suggestive of adjustment for DIF by age
group and by number of PFD comorbid conditions. Item difficulties were
suitable for patients with PFD with no ceiling or floor effect. Mean item
difficulty parameters for each subscale ranged from 38.8 to 62.3, and 28.1
to 63.3 (0 to 100 scale), respectively. Endorsed leakage items representing
highest difficulty levels were related to delay defecation, and confidence to
control bowel leakage. Endorsed constipation items representing highest
difficulty levels were related to the need to strain during a bowel move-
ment and the frequency of bowel movements.
Conclusions: Results supported its initial use for patients with PFD in
outpatient rehabilitation services.
Key Words: Rehabiliation, pelvic floor, fecal incontinence
Disclosure: Ying-Chih Wang has nothing to disclose.
Poster 152
Clinicians’ Use of the Multiple Errands Test for adults withNeurological Disorders
Emily Joan Nalder (Baycrest Hospital), Nicole Anderson,Amanda Clark, Deirdre Dawson
Objective: To investigate clinicians’ experiences adapting the Multiple
Errands Test (MET) to their worksites and determine how findings inform
their clinical practicewhen working with adults with neurological disorders.
Design: Qualitative research design.
Setting: Participants interviewed worked in inpatient, outpatient and
community based rehabilitation settings.
Participants: A purposive sample of 8 clinicians with experience using the
MET in clinical practice were recruited.
Interventions: Not applicableMain Outcome measures: The MET is an ecologically valid assessment of
how executive dysfunction impacts real-life performance. Individuals
complete required tasks (e.g., purchasing items) while adhering to set rules
(e.g., you must not speak to the examiner). In-depth semi-structured inter-
views were conducted using an interview guide to explore topics such as
organisational context, processes for adapting theMET, and use ofMETdata
in clinical practice.
Results: Preliminary analyses showed the MET to be clinically useful for
monitoring rehabilitation progress, functional capacity evaluations and
lifetime care planning. Organisational factors influenced how the METwas
used, and site specific adaptations to the assessment. Strategies employed
by individuals during MET completion were a dominant data source used
by clinicians to interpret individual performance.
Conclusions: Findings indicate observations of client behaviour and
strategy use during MET completion inform clinical decisions around
rehabilitation needs. Results will inform the development of knowledge
translation strategies (e.g., the development of a training manual for the
MET) to effectively address clinician needs across contexts.
Key Words: Executive function, task performance and analysis, profes-
sional practice, rehabilitation.
Disclosure: Emily Nalder has nothing to disclose.
www.archives-pmr.org