Post implementation in Project management

16
Post Implementation A PRESENTATION BASED ON CASED STUDY OF HP’ POST IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE 1

description

Importance of ERP implementation Risk identification in ERP implementation Minimizing risk in ERP implementation

Transcript of Post implementation in Project management

Page 1: Post implementation in Project management

1

Post ImplementationA PRESENTATION BASED ON CASED STUDY OF HP’ POST IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE

Page 2: Post implementation in Project management

2

Overview

About

• Importance of ERP implementation

• i* modelling in real time problems

What will you learn?

• Risk identification in ERP implementation

• Minimizing risk in ERP implementation

• Importance of IT in business

Page 3: Post implementation in Project management

3

Phases in Post-Implementation

Go Live Readiness: Readiness Checkpoint; Assessment of Development, configuration, conversion, testing, training, communications, operations, command central, reporting and users.

ERP Training: Training for system users by trainer having experience in respective dept.

Stabilization: Preparation of subject matter excerpts. Helps users to operate in correct way.

Post Production Support: Managing daily system operation and ensuring correct working by Training , Go-live support, Data Validation, Data correction, Patches and fixes.

Knowledge Transfer: Documenting project monitoring and tracking collaboration and communication, subject matter expertise and lesson learned repository.

Implication for Management: Identify the issue and focus resources and efforts. Comprehensive knowledge transfer when consultant, staff, implementation partner staff and end-user leave.

Page 4: Post implementation in Project management

4

Product Life cycle chart

Implementation Operation and post production

Application Management

Required Maintenance

Testing

Base personnel

Major upgrades

Resource requirement

Production

High

Med

Low

Go-Live

Backlog

New

Modules

Developm

entD

esign and gap

Project preview

Page 5: Post implementation in Project management

5

Case Study : SAP ERP Implementation, HP

Issues Identified in failure of ERP implementation of HP

• Gap B/w training and going live : Users forgot the details to use the system

• Shortcoming in ERP testing procedure: Development of robust testing procedure and test data is essential in ERP implementation.

Page 6: Post implementation in Project management

6

Process Flow: SAP ERP Implementation, HP

Interaction b/w project manager, project sponsors and implementation team

SD (Strategic Dependency) diagram for Process Flow

Project manager

Funds

Requirements

Approve Changes

Implementation of ERP

Business Sponsor

Implementation Team

Page 7: Post implementation in Project management

7

Current Training

Training should be a continual and ongoing process in ERP implementation: Allows end users to understand new procedures in better way.

Providing most of the training in the essential transaction before going live very important: Prevents users from forgetting at time of use.

Informing users about where process is used and implication on overall system: They remain concerned about making mistakes.

Availability of Real-time Data: Helps understanding the system in better way and eliminates fear of making mistakes.

Examination for Users: It helps to identify the understanding progress of user hence knowing whether they are ready to go live or not.

Hierarchal training procedures: It makes problem solving easier and manager can act as mentor.

Page 8: Post implementation in Project management

8

Current training procedure at HP

SD (Strategic Dependency) diagram for Training procedure at HP

ERP trainer and consultant

Logistics team

Project Manager

Authorization Team

Training Course Material

EmployeesCourse Material

Stationary and Transportation

Stationary and transportation

Course Material

Stationary and Transportation

Course Material

Creation of login ID

Training of ERP

Creation of Login Id

Creation of Login IDs

Training of ERP

Page 9: Post implementation in Project management

9Recommendation to HP for training Procedure

To-and-fro relationship between various actors involved, namely, The Core Team, The Trainers, and The End Users (Employees)

Trainer’s training at beginning of implementation: Utilize the software to complete end to end business process and impart trainer to keep End-user training closely related to overall corporate strategy. Selection of Training Schedule

Management of Geographic Constraints

Establishment of training schedule

Definition of training Assessments

Scheduling proper end-user training development from your go-live date: It will prevent delay between training and going live which was major failure for HP implementation fail.

Page 10: Post implementation in Project management

10

Continued…..

Scheduling proper end-user training development from your go-live date: It will prevent delay between training and going live i.e. incompetent training, which was major reason for failure of HP ERP implementation. Trainer should provide the training to End users in following 3 modules: General End –User training

Selected End-User Training

Effective Training Assessment

Page 11: Post implementation in Project management

11

Problems in Testing Procedure at HP

No testing of modules were present

No robust test plan and development data

Testing was not done on the basis of real time Data and customer.

Page 12: Post implementation in Project management

12

Testing procedure at HP

Dependency of testing coordinator, project manager, implementation team, tester and user.

SD (Strategic Dependency) diagram for Testing procedure at HP

Implementation team

Testing Coordinator

Project manager User

TesterCompletion of Implementation

Integration testing

System testing User acceptance testing

Unite Testing

Develop test cases

Test case specification

Page 13: Post implementation in Project management

13Recommended testing procedure at HP

Tester is not only required to do unite testing , system testing and integration testing but also parallel testing and stress testing using the real data and real customers

SD (Strategic Dependency) diagram for Recommended Testing procedure at HP

Test Team Coordinator

User Acceptance

TestingUserTester

Parallel Testing

Stress Testing

Integration Testing

System testing

Unit testing

Page 14: Post implementation in Project management

14

Risk Assessment and Management

Risks Database failure/Overload: Due to presence of many backlog orders risk of database failure is very

high. Have a backup system to handle the database overload will mitigate the risk to great extent.

Inconsistency/Incompatibility: The compatibility gap between legacy system and new system (SAP) is a big risk in any ERP implementation project. Manual updating of transactions of various modules of legacy system can make many format compatible.

Page 15: Post implementation in Project management

15

Database failure

Confirm order

Stock check

Update Database

Payment success

Backup database User friendly

messages

Order confirmation

No Order confirmation

No DB Update

Technical snag

Order Backlog

OrderOrder module

Update Status

Efficient Service

DB..Failure

DB Failure handling

Backup DB handling

Page 16: Post implementation in Project management

16

Inconsistency/Incompatibility

LegacySAP

DB Update

Updating of modules

Order sequencing

Time Consuming

Order priority

Manual Updating

DB Update

OrderOrder

PositionCompartment