Porosity Methods Comparison

download Porosity Methods Comparison

of 3

Transcript of Porosity Methods Comparison

  • 8/15/2019 Porosity Methods Comparison

    1/3

    X-4Scale : 1 : 2500

    DEPTH (11200.FT - 13000.FT) 11/06/2008 09:24DB : IP Database NewNo 2008 (222)

    1

    DEPTH

    (FT)

    2 !a""a#a$

    I%&':!# (!PI)0.

    200.

    Poos*t$

    I%&':+N,e0.6 0.

    at*

    I%&':DT40. 140.

    Poos*t$

    &*:P*De% (e )0. -0.

    &*:P*o% (e )0. -0.

    &*:P*o%H# (e )0. -0.

    &*:P*Ne' (e )0. -0.

    &oo:P5# (())0. -0.

    11400

    11600

    11800

    12000

    12200

    12400

    12600

    12800

    13000

  • 8/15/2019 Porosity Methods Comparison

    2/3

  • 8/15/2019 Porosity Methods Comparison

    3/3

    X-5Scale : 1 : 2500

    DEPTH (10000.FT - 119.FT) 11/06/2008 09:29DB : IP Database NewNo 2008 (1)

    1

    DEPTH

    (FT)

    2 !a""a#a$

    I%&':!# (PI)0. 200.

    Poos*t$

    I%&':+N,e ( )0.6 0.

    at*

    I%&':DT ('e/7t)40. 140.

    Poos*t$

    &*:P*De% (e)0. -0.

    &*:P*o% (e)0. -0.

    &*:P*Ne' (e)0. -0.

    &*:P*o%H# (e )0. -0.

    &oo:P5# ()0. -0.

    10200

    10400

    10600

    10800

    11000

    11200

    11400

    11600