popov statbility
-
Upload
prashantsingh04 -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of popov statbility
8/12/2019 popov statbility
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/popov-statbility 2/6
( ) ( 12 x f x g )−−=ψ (8)
then the Jacobian matrix of this system is (where we have to
give for the coordinate of singular point
)
21 ; x x
0 ; 2101 == x x x
( )⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
∂∂
∂∂=
21
0
10
x x
ψ ψ xJ (9)
and then following equations represents the linearization of
the nonlinear equations about the equilibrium point
( )
( ) ψψ
d
d
d
d
22
1011
2
2101
x x
x x x
xt
x x xt
∂
∂+−
∂
∂=
=−
(10)
2211 x x x ∂∂∂
These equation
Table I: Linearized equations of nonlinear systems
NoEquation of nonlinear
systemψ
Singular
pointsLinearized equation
1 0=+′+′′ y yby y r 121 x xbx r −− [ ]0;0 0=+′′ y y
2 0=+′+′′ cy yby ya r 121 x
a
c x x
a
b r −− [ ]0;0 0=+′′ ya
c y
[ ]0;0
1012
21
ψψψ x x x x
x x
∂+
∂−
∂=′
=′⇒
s correspond to the linearized second order
0=+′+′′ ya
c y
a
b y
3 02 =++′+′′ dycy yb ya 2112 x
a
d x
a
c x
a
b−−−
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡− 0;
d
c0=+−′+′′
a
c y
a
c y
a
b y
4 0=++′+′′ t dycy yb ya t x
a
d x
a
c x
a
b112 −−− [ ]0;0 0=+′+′′ y
a
c y
a
b y
5 0=+′+′+′′ dy ycy yb yar 1212 x
a
d x x
a
c x
a
b r −−− [ ]0;0 0=+′+′′ ya
d y
a
b y
[ ]0;0 0=+′+′′ ya
d y
a
b y
6 02 =++′+′+′′ eydy yc yb ya r 21122 x
a
e x
a
d x
a
c x
a
b r −−−−
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡− 0;
e
d 0=−′+′′ y
a
d y
a
b y
7 0=++′+′+′′ t r eydy yc yb ya t r x
a
e x
a
d x
a
c x
a
b1122 −−−−
[ ]0;0 0=+′+′′ ya
d y
a
b y
8 ( ) 0=+′++′′ cy ynymb ya r ( ) 121 x
a
c xnxm
a
b r −+− [ ]0;0 0=+′+′′ ya
c ym
a
b y
9 ( ) 0=+′++′′
cy ynymyb ya
qr p
( ) 1211 xa
c
xnxmxa
b qr p −+− [ ]
0;0 0
=+′′ ya
c
y
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2009 Vol IIWCECS 2009, October 20-22, 2009, San Francisco, USA
ISBN:978-988-18210-2-7 WCECS 2009
8/12/2019 popov statbility
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/popov-statbility 4/6
( )
( )[ ] ( ) 22
2112
21221
22
11
21
12122
,
x x x x x x x x
x x
V x
x
V x xV
+−=−+−+=
=′∂
∂+′
∂
∂=′
The function V ́ is negative semidefinite (because for x2
= 0 the function V ́ is for arbitrary x1 equals zero) and the
system is globally stable.
III. POPOV CRITERION
The Popov criterion is considered as one of the most ap-
propriate criteria for nonlinear systems and it can be com-
pared with the Nyquist criterion for linear systems [4].
However there are reservations that relate to the very es-
sence, correctness and reliability of the criterion. It is nec-
essary to emphasise that this criterion is reliable, but the
conditions of its appl. should be clearly specified in advance.
Table II: Lyapunov´s functions for second-order systems
No Equation of system Restriction Lyapunov function V
1 0=+′+′′ cy yb ya -
2 0=+′+′′ cy yby ya qr r even q odd
22
21 x x
a
cV +=
3 0=+′+′′t qr
cy yby ya r even q,t odd
4 ( ) 0=+′++′′ t q sr cy ynymyb ya r,s even q,t odd
5 ( )( ) 0=+′+′++′′ t k q sr cy y f yenymyb ya r,s even k,q,t odd
22
11
1
12 x x
t a
cV t +
+= +
Table III: Lyapunov´s functions for third-order systems
No Equation of system Restriction Lyapunov function V
1 0=′+′′+′′′ r m yb ya y a,b>0
m,r odd23
12
1
2 x x
r
bV
r ++
= +
2 0=′+′′+′′′+′′′ ht r nm ye y yb y ya y
a,b,e>0
m,r odd
n,t,h even
23
12
1
2 x x
h
eV
h ++
= +
3 0=′+′′′+′′′+′′′ ht sr pnm ye y y yb y y ya y
a,b,e>0
h,m,r odd
n,p,s,t even
23
12
1
2 x x
h
eV h +
+= +
4
01 =′′′+
+′′′+′′+′′′+′′′
− z
ut sr pnm
y y yd
y y yc y yb y ya y
a,b,c,d>0
m,p,s,z odd
n,r,t,u even
23
12
1
2 x x
d V z +
+= +
5
0=′+
+′′′+′′+′′′+′′′
h
ut sr pnm
ye
y y yc y yb y ya y
a,b,c,e>0
m,p,s,h odd
n,r,t,u even
23
12
1
2 x x
h
eV
h ++
= +
6
01 =′+′′′+
+′′′+′′+′′′+′′′
− h z
ut sr pnm
ye y y yd
y y yc y yb y ya y
a,b,c,d,e>0
h,m,p,s,z odd
n,r,t,u even 23
12
11
1
2
1
2
x xh
e
x z
d V
h
z
++
+
++
=
+
+
701 =−′+′′′+
+′′′+′′+′′′+′′′
− y y y y y
u yt y s yc y ybn ym ya y r p
a,b,c>0
m,p,s odd n,r,t,u
even( ) 2
32
21 x x xV +−=
801 =+′+′′′+
+′′′+′′+′′′+′′′
− fy ye y y yd
y y yc y yb y ya y ut sr pnm
a,b,c,d,e>0f<0
d
f e
2=
m,p,s odd
n,r,t,u even
23
2
21 x xd
f xd V +⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛ +=
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2009 Vol IIWCECS 2009, October 20-22, 2009, San Francisco, USA
ISBN:978-988-18210-2-7 WCECS 2009
8/12/2019 popov statbility
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/popov-statbility 5/6
Fig. 1 shows the system configuration with one nonlinear
element and a linear part with the transfer function G( s) that
can include all linear elements. It shows the nonlinearity that
is single-valued, time–invariant and constrained to a hatch
sector bounded by slopes k that is assumed to satisfy: for the
case when all poles of G( s) are inside the left-half plane
( )∞<≤≤ k
e
e f 0 ,
for the case when G( s) has poles on the imaginary axis (the
so-called critical case)
( )∞<≤< k
e
e f 0
.
Fig.1: Non-linear control circuit and characteristic of
nonlinear element
For the case that G( s) has poles only inside the left-half
s-plane, the static characteristic can be zero both in the be-
ginning and out of the beginning. For the case when G( s) has
poles on the imaginary axis, it must not be zero out of the
beginning.
A nonlinear circuit with a transfer function of the linear
part G( s) and with the nonlinear element (with the above
described nonlinearity) is globally asymptotically stable
when an arbitrary real number q (> 0 or = 0 or < 0) exists
where for every ω ≥ 0 the following inequality is completed
( ) ( )[ ] 01
ωω1Re >++k
jGq j (14)
The Popov criterion can be – for more convenience – ap-
plied graphically in the G ( jω)-plane. Let us apply a modified
frequency response function G*( jω), defined
for (15)( ) ( )
( ) ( )ωIm.ωωIm
ωReωRe
jG jG
jG jG
=
=
∗
∗
0ω ≥
and we obtain the graphical interpretation of the Popov cri-terion for global asymptotic stability (GAS): The sufficient
condition for GAS of nonlinear circuit is that the plot of
G*( jω) should lie entirely to the right of the Popov line which
crosses the real axis at -1/k at a slope 1/q (q is an arbitrary
real number) .
In this contribution table III shows the commonly used
nonlinear circuits (with stability being solved). The table has
been constructed for the circuits with different transfer
function G( s).There is an algebraic solution to the inequality
(14) on condition that:
0 ≤ k < ∞ (only for poles G( s) inside the left-half of s-plane);
0 < k < ∞ (also for poles G( s) on the imaginary axis); a, b >0; ω... for every value from 0 to ∞ ; q...arbitrary.
In the table IV, the frequency response function of the
linear part of the circuit is presented in the form inserted to
the inequality (14), and the resultant relation is presented
after modifications. If the inequality is satisfied for k, q, a, b,
ω, the circuit in question is globally asymptotically stable
(GAS)
Table IV: Modified frequency response plots
N
o
G( s) G*( jω)
1 a
2 as
3as
1
4a s +
1
∞=ω
5a s
s
+
6 2
1
as
7( )2
1a s +
8( )2
a s
s
+
9( )2
1
a s s +
10( )3
1
a s +
11( )2
a s s
b s
+
+
12 ( )( )2
1
a sb s ++
Im
ReIm
-1 /a
Im
Re1 /a
ω
=0
-1
Re1ω=0
∞=ω a
∞=ω
ReIm
ω=0
Re
Im
1/a2
ω
=0∞=ω
Im Re
-1
ω=0
∞=ω
Im Re
ω=0
∞=ω
321
a−
ImRe
ω=0
∞=ω 38
1a
−
31
a
Im-1 /a2
ω=0 -1 /a
∞=ω
Re
ImRe
ω=0
∞=ω 2)(2
1
baa +−
ba21
Im
∞=ω
Re
Im
ω=0
Rea
u
equation u=ke
slope: k
static
characteri
( ) sG
u
eeu w=0
k
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2009 Vol IIWCECS 2009, October 20-22, 2009, San Francisco, USA
ISBN:978-988-18210-2-7 WCECS 2009
8/12/2019 popov statbility
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/popov-statbility 6/6
for every value k . If it is not the case, then it is possible to
determine for which k circuit is GAS or that it is not for any k
(this calculation is illustrated in the table). Therefore the table
will allow us to directly determine the stability of the
nonlinear circuit with the transfer function G( s) and the
nonlinearity that satisfies the slope k . Table V illustrates the
modified frequency response plots enabling us graphic solu-
tions to stability.
IV. CONCLUSION Stability analysis of nonlinear control systems is difficult
task in engineering practice. This paper can help to solve the
problem. The describe methods creates tables and graphs for
three methods of stability analysis.First method is method of linearization. The table
includes the nonlinear equations and directs their linear ap-
proximation. Second method is Lyapunov direct method.
The table contains Lyapunov functions for usually used
control circuits second and third-order. The last method is
Popov criterion. The table will allow us to directly determine
the stability of the nonlinear circuit with the transfer function
G( s) and the nonlinearity that satisfies the slope k .
R EFERENCES
[1] R. Iserman, “Digital Control Systems”, Springer , Berlin, 1989
[2] W. S. Levine, “The Control Handbook ”, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton,
Florida 1996
[3] I. Svarc, R. Matousek, “How and when to use Popov and circle criteria
for stability”, In Proceedings of the ICCC ’2008, Sinaia (Romania),
2008, pp. 663-666. ISBN 978-973-746-897-0
[4] I. Svarc, “Stability analysis of nonlinear control systems using lin-
earization”, In Proceedings of 5th ICCC’2004, Zakopane, pages 25 - 30
[5] I. Svarc, “A new approach to graphs to stability of nonlinear controlsystems”, Journal Elektronika, Warsaw, No 8-9/2004, pages 18-22
[6] N. Sidorov, B. Loginov, A. Sinitsyn, M. Falaleev, “Lyapunov-Schmidt
Method in Nonlinear analysis and Applications”, Kluwer Academic
Publisher , 2002
Table V: Results of stability analysis by Popov´s criterion
No G( s) G( jω) in inequality (14)
( ) ( )[ ] 01
1Re >++k
jGq j ω ω Solution of (14)
Conditions of
stability
1 a a ka+1 > 0 GAS for every k
2 as ajω 1 - k ω3q > 0 GAS for every k
3as
1
ω a j
1− qk + a > 0 GAS for every k
4a s +
1
2222ω
ω
ω +−
+ a j
a
a
02
22
>+
+++
ω
ω aqak GAS for every k
5a s
s
+
2222
2
ω
ω
ω
ω
++
+ a
a j
a
( )
0
1
2
22
>+
++−
ω
ω aaqk GAS for every k
6 2
1
as
2
1
ω a− 2
ω ak < not stable for
arbitrary k
7( )2
1
a s +
( ) ( )222222
22 2
ω
ω
ω
ω
+−
+
−
a
a j
a
a
( )
( ) 0
12
222
22
>++
++−
ω
ω
a
kaaqk GAS for every k
8( )2
a s
s
+
( ) ( )222
32
222
22
ω
ω ω
ω
ω
+
−+
+ a
a j
a
a
( )( ) 0
2222
222
>++
+−+
ω
ω ω
a
aqak GAS for every k
9( )2
1
a s s +
( ) ( )222
22
222
2
ω ω
ω
ω +
−+
+
−
a
a j
a
a…
GAS for
k < 2a3
10 ( )31
a s + ( ) ......1
3 =+ a jω … GAS fork < 8a3
11( )2
a s s
b s
+
+
( )...
2 =
+
+
a j j
b j
ω ω
ω
32234
2456
28104
6124
abbabaa
babaak
−+−
+−−>
12( )( )2
1
a sb s ++
( )( )...
12 =
++ a jb j ω ω
( )2
4322345 281282
ba
abbababaak
+
++++<
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2009 Vol IIWCECS 2009, October 20-22, 2009, San Francisco, USA
ISBN:978-988-18210-2-7 WCECS 2009