CMH_Pub_10-19 Transportation Corps - Responsibilites, Organization
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan July 2010 Steering Committee -...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan July 2010 Steering Committee -...
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
July 2010
Steering Committee - January 28, 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
Polk Transportation Planning OrganizationPolk Transportation Planning Organization
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Topics
• Project Prioritization
• Transit
• Highways
• Non-Motorized Facilities
• Financial Resources
• Public Outreach
• Schedule
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Transit Prioritization
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Eight Scoring Criteria address:
•Previous Planning Efforts (2060
TVP, PTA Expansion Plan)
•Regional Connectivity and
Accessibility (Transit
Centers/Park and Ride Lots)
•Demographic and Socio-
Economic Indicators (Transit
Potential Areas)
•Urban Form and Planned Growth
(TSDA, TCCO)
•Public Input
Transit Evaluation Criteria & Scoring
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Additional Considerations
• PTA Plan represents first five years of cost affordable transit improvements
• Subsequent phasing will be based on project ranking with the following considerations emphasized:
– Anticipated route productivity (ridership)
– Available projected revenues
– Public input
– Timing of growth – implement improvements in growth areas concurrent with anticipated development
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Highway Prioritization
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
State Intermodal System (SIS) Cost-Feasible Projects in Polk County
Road From To Improvement Type
Phase Cost (YOE $M)
Period
US 98 Manor Dr CR 540-A Widen to 6L Const 30.707 2015-2019
US 27 N of SR 540 N of SR 542
Widen to 6L Const 25.485 2015-2019
US 98 CR 540A SR 540 Widen to 6L Const 69.825 2020-2025
US 27 Richie Rd Barry Rd Widen to 6L ROW & Const
89.487 2020-2025
US 27 Barry Rd Lake Co Line
Widen to 6L ROW & Const
148.006 2031-2035
Source: SIS Long Range Capacity Plan (Approved 2009)
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Highway Project Prioritization – Non-SIS Roads
Based on Approved 2035 Goals & Objectives
• Multi-Modal System Development
• Environmental Sustainability
• Regional Support
• Freight & Goods Movement
• Efficiency & Interconnectivity
• Safety & Security
• Public Input
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d)• Candidate projects evaluated by whether they
would:
– Complete or fill gap(s) in system
– Connect directly to desired destinations or facilities
– Be within specific designated areas
– Address problems or enhance designated facilities
– Satisfy need(s) expressed by public to date
Project Evaluation Criterion Assessment Scoring (Points)
Project Completes:
Sidewalk Top 100 In Top 100 = Y 1
Sidewalk Gap Fills Sidewalk Facility Gap/Need = Y 1
Bicycle Top 100 In Top 100 = Y 1
Bicycle Facility Gap Fills Bicycle Facility Gap/Need = Y 1
Project Connects Directly to:
Airport Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Park & Ride Lot Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Transit Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Regional Intermodal Hub Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Regional Activity Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Freight Activity Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
High Speed Rail Station Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Project is Within:
Environmental Justice (EJ) Area F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None
F=2, P=1, N=0
Multimodal LOS District District I, II or III III=3, II=2, I=1
Transit Supportive Development Area
F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None
F=2, P=1, N=0
Transit Corridors and Centers Overlay
F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None
F=2, P=1, N=0
100-Year Flood Hazard Area H = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low
H=0, M=1, L=2
ETDM Environmental Screening Tool Analysis:
Potential Cumulative Degree of Effect
H = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low (see EST Results tab)
H=0, M=1, L=2
Project Evaluation Criterion Assessment Scoring (Points)
Project Enhances or Improves:
Evacuation Route Y = Evac Route 1Regional Road Network Y = on Regional Network 1Regional Transit Route Y = Serves regional or inter-county
transit route1
Strategic Intermodal System Facility Y = on SIS 1
Major Truck Route Y = on Truck Route 1Major Road Network Connectivity Y = Makes New Connection between
Major Roads1
Current Congestion LOS D; LOS E; LOS F; all others = A-C (based on 5 yr LOS)
F=5, E=3, D=1, A-C=0
Future Congestion Volume to Capacity Ratio (based on 2035 E+C Network V/C)
>1.50 = 5, 1.25 to 1.50 = 3, 1.00 to
1.24 = 1, <1.00 = 0
Safety Top 50 Crash Locations (2005 - 2009) # = Number of Locations
intersected by project
Public Involvement:
Public Input on Project Public comments received on facility or corridor (as of April 2010)
# = Number of times cited as need
in surveys
Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology (Cont’d.)•Environmental Screening GIS Tool Used to Evaluate Potential Degree of Effect on Natural & Man-Made Environment•Analyzed project impact within 500’ buffer•Scores based on # of features found or % of buffer area falling within:
Wetland Areas Recreational Areas
Wildlife & Habitat Areas Prime Farmlands
Flood Hazard Areas Historic/Arch. Sites
Special Areas (e.g. Green Swamp Contaminated Sites
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
2030 TRIP 2035 MVP
Criteria Relative Weight Criteria Relative Weight
Existing Congestion
12.5% Efficiency & Interconnectivity
20%
Future Congestion 12.5%
Freight/Economic Competitiveness
20% Freight & Goods Movement
15%
Community Impacts
10% Multi-Modal System Dev.
15%
Environmental Impacts
10% Environmental Sustainability
20%
Safety 20% Safety & Security 20%
Project Status 10% Regional Support 5%
Short-Term Need 5% Public Input 5%
Total 100% Total 100%
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d)
•Relative Weight (%) assigned to each category divided by maximum points for that category to arrive at weighted scores
•Ranking based on weighted scores
•Ranked project list divided into Tiers I, II and III
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Non-Motorized Prioritization
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
PRIORITY ROAD FROM TO COST
5 CR 557* US 17/92 I-4 $1,560,461.30
9 US 17/92 (SEVENTEENTH ST)* HINSON AVE CR 547 $126,970.00
19 US 98* EDGEWOOD DR LAKE PARKER AVE $379,640.30
20 US 98* SR 540 EDGEWOOD DR $355,516.00
22 US 98* LYLE PKWY CR 540A $812,608.00
35 SR 546 (MEMORIAL BLVD)* I-4 WABASH AVE $609,456.00
36 CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)* US 92 10TH ST $634,850.00
39 US 17/92 (HINSON AVE)* US 27 10TH ST $153,633.70
40 US 27* SR 60 TOWERVIEW BLVD $761,820.00
44 US 92/98 (MEMORIAL BLVD)* LAKE PARKER AVENUE SR 659 $589,140.80
51 US 98* CR 540A SR 540 $961,162.90
52 SR 542* CARL FLOYD RD US 27 $711,032.00
54 SR 542 (CENTRAL AVE)* 14TH ST CARL FLOYD RD $457,092.00
55 SR 35 (BARTOW RD)* LAKE PARKER AVE S MAIN ST $152,364.00
70 SR 60* CR 655 US 27 $2,056,914.00
75 US 17/92* ROCHELLE AVE US 27 $1,409,367.00
87 US 92* SR 659 SR 655 $1,498,246.00
88 US 98* DAUGHTERY RD CR 35A $1,485,549.00
95 US 17* SR 60A CONNECTOR SPIRIT LAKE RD $1,193,518.00
$15,909,341.00
Cumulative Total for Top 100 Sidewalk Projects $51,750,305.63
Less Projects Included in Highway Needs $15,909,341.00
$35,840,964.63
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
PRIORITY ROAD FROM TO COST
3 CR 557* US 17/92 I-4 $1,721,239.98
24 WABASH AVE S* ARIANA ST US 92 $284,656.38
25 US 17 (FIFTH ST)* CRYSTAL BEACH RD GILBERT ST $473,540.52
34 US 17/92 (LAKE SHORE WAY)* COLUMBIA ST ROCHELLE AVE $170,261.76
35 US 92 (WABASH AVE)* GEORGE JENKINS BLVD SR 546 $242,090.94
39 US 92/98 (MEMORIAL BLVD)* FLORIDA AVE LAKE PARKER AVE $268,694.34
49 SR 544 (AVE T NW)* US 17 1ST ST NW $133,017.00
50 US 17/92 (HINSON AVE)* US 27 10TH ST $327,221.82
55 US 17 (SIXTH ST NW)* 6TH ST SW @ AVE A SW SR 544 $465,559.50
64 CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)* US 92 10TH ST $675,726.36
85 SR 60 (HESPERIDES RD)* US 27 SR 17 $316,580.46
88 US 92/98 (MEMORIAL BLVD)* LAKE PARKER AVENUE SR 659 $569,312.76
99 SR 37* ALAFIA RIVER (NORTH PRONG) SR 60 $106,413.60
$5,754,315.42
Cumulative Total for Top 100 Bike Projects $39,960,967.14
Less Projects Included in Highway Needs $5,754,315.42
$34,206,651.72
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Other Arterials (State & Fed.), $423
Enhancement Funds (Fed.), $12
TRIP, $30
Local Ad Val Tax, $650
Local Op. Gas Tax, $117
Impact Dist A, $17
Impact Dist B, $57
Impact Dist C, $76
Impact Dist D, $58
Impact Dist E, $79
Highway Funding Forecast by Source($M, 2015 - 2035)
Total Funding = $1,668 MTotal Project Cost Est. = $6,946 M
Difference = ($5,278 M)
DRAFT
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Federal Cash Grants, $210
State Cash Grants, $79Federal
Discretionary Grants, $28
State Service Development
Grants, $7
Passenger Fares, $40
Proposed Local Tax, $892
Transit Funding Forecast(2015 - 2035, $M) Total Funding = $892 M
Total Capital Cost Est. = $2,004 MTotal Operating Cost Est.* = $998 M
Difference = ($2,110 M)
* Assumes constant rate of growth in service & rail service starting in 2035
DRAFT
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Next Steps:• Finalize project evaluation & rankings (still
draft at this point)• Assign funding sources to candidate
projects to determine cost feasibility• Break large projects into smaller segments• Confirm funding assumptions• Obtain and consider public input on project
priorities
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Public Involvement – Outreach
Website - www.2035mobilityvisionplan.org
Public Workshops
August/September
West, Central and East/Ridge
Updated Newsletter
Specific input on projects in the Plan
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Project ScheduleSept
2009
Dec Mar
2010
June Sept Dec 2010
2011
Draft GOPs
Draft Needs Plan
Project Eval./Priorities
Draft Cost Feasible Plan
TPO Approves Draft
Community Workshops
TPO Adoption
Final MVP Document
July 2010July 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
July 2010
Questions / Comments Review & Concur with Project
Prioritization