Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Steering Committee -...
-
Upload
sherman-greer -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Steering Committee -...
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
August 2010
Steering Committee - January 28, 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
Polk Transportation Planning OrganizationPolk Transportation Planning Organization
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Topics
• Introduction
• Project Prioritization
• Transit
• Highways
• Non-Motorized Facilities
• Financial Resources
• Draft Cost Feasible Plan
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Introduction
• The Draft Cost Feasible Plan is a financially constrained version of the 2035 Needs Plan based on available revenue (federal, state & local) through the year 2035.
• The Draft Cost Feasible Plan contains the most important projects (priorities) indentified in the Needs Plan.
• These projects are the source for the TPO’s future priority projects.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Introduction
• Staff is requesting the Board to review and approve the 2035 Draft Cost Feasible Plan.
• Public Review and Comment Period• August 12th through December 9th.
• 2035 MVP Public Hearing and Final Adoption is scheduled for December 9th.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Transit Prioritization
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Eight Scoring Criteria:
•Previous Plans (2060 Plan,
PTA Expansion)
•Regional Connectivity and
Accessibility (Transit
Centers/Park and Ride Lots)
•Transit Potential
•Urban Form and Planned
Growth
•Public Input
Transit Evaluation Criteria & Scoring
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Additional Considerations
• PTA Plan represents first five years of cost affordable transit improvements
• Subsequent phasing will be based on project ranking with the following considerations emphasized:
– Anticipated route productivity (ridership)
– Available projected revenues
– Public input
– Timing of growth – implement improvements in growth areas concurrent with anticipated development
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Highway Prioritization
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Yellow indicates Change Since March
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
State Intermodal System (SIS) Cost-Feasible Projects in Polk County
Road From To Improvement Type
Phase Cost (YOE $M)
Period
US 98 Manor Dr CR 540-A Widen to 6L Const 30.707 2015-2019
US 27 N of SR 540 N of SR 542
Widen to 6L Const 25.485 2015-2019
US 98 CR 540A SR 540 Widen to 6L Const 69.825 2020-2025
US 27 Richie Rd Barry Rd Widen to 6L ROW & Const
89.487 2020-2025
US 27 Barry Rd Lake Co Line
Widen to 6L ROW & Const
148.006 2031-2035
Source: SIS Long Range Capacity Plan (Approved 2009)
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Highway Project Prioritization – Non-SIS Roads
Based on Approved 2035 Goals & Objectives
• Multi-Modal System Development
• Environmental Sustainability
• Regional Support
• Freight & Goods Movement
• Efficiency & Interconnectivity
• Safety & Security
• Public Input
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d)• Candidate projects evaluated by whether they
would:
– Complete or fill gap(s) in system
– Connect directly to desired destinations or facilities
– Lie within specific designated areas
– Address problems or enhance designated facilities
– Satisfy need(s) expressed by public
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Non-motorized Transportation
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Non-motorized Facilities
• Top 100 Projects identified for:– Bicycle Improvements – typically done as part
of road projects– Sidewalk Improvements – done as part of
road projects or stand-alone enhancements
• Multi-Use Trail Projects– Typically done as funding & opportunities
arise
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
PRIORITY ROAD FROM TO COST
5 CR 557* US 17/92 I-4 $1,560,461.30
9 US 17/92 (SEVENTEENTH ST)* HINSON AVE CR 547 $126,970.00
19 US 98* EDGEWOOD DR LAKE PARKER AVE $379,640.30
20 US 98* SR 540 EDGEWOOD DR $355,516.00
22 US 98* LYLE PKWY CR 540A $812,608.00
36 CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)* US 92 10TH ST $634,850.00
51 US 98* CR 540A SR 540 $961,162.90
55 SR 35 (BARTOW RD)* LAKE PARKER AVE S MAIN ST $152,364.00
$4,983,572.50
Cumulative Total for Top 100 Sidewalk Projects $51,750,305.63
Less Projects Included in Highway Needs $4,983,572.50
$46,766,733.13
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
PRIORITY ROAD FROM TO COST
3 CR 557* US 17/92 I-4 $1,721,239.98
24 WABASH AVE S* ARIANA ST US 92 $284,656.38
55 US 17 (SIXTH ST NW)* 6TH ST SW @ AVE A SW SR 544 $465,559.50
64 CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)* US 92 10TH ST $675,726.36
$3,147,182.22
Cumulative Total for Top 100 Bike Projects $39,960,967.14
Less Projects Included in Highway Needs $3,148,182.22
$36,812,784.92
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Financial Resources
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Other Arterials (State & Fed.), $409
Enhancement Funds (Fed.), $13
TRIP, $44
Local Ad Val Tax, $991
Local Op. Gas Tax, $175
Impact Dist A, $26
Impact Dist B, $92
Impact Dist C, $117
Impact Dist D, $88
Impact Dist E, $121
Community Redev.
Areas, $33
Highway Funding Forecast by Source(YOE $M, 2015 - 2035)
Total Funding = $2,109 M (YOE)
DRAFT
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Highway Capacity NeedsEstimated Costs (2016 –
2035, in PDC)
Total Needs $5,918 M
Cost Feasible Projects $1,819 M
Difference $4,099 M
DRAFT
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Central Polk Parkway• PD& E study underway• $30 to $36M needed to fund Design in Cost
Feasible Plan• Right-of-Way & Construction Unfunded• Seek Additional Funding through:
– Next SIS Plan - TRIP– Federal Earmark(s) - Private Sources– Toll Revenues
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Federal Cash Grants, $210
State Cash Grants, $79
Federal Discretionary Grants, $28
State Service Development
Grants, $7
Passenger Fares, $81
Proposed Local Tax, $914
Transit Funding Forecast(2015 - 2035, YOE $M) Total Funding = $1,320 M (YOE)
DRAFT
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Transit Needs (2011 – 2035) Estimated Costs (PDC)
Total Needs* $3,214 M
Cost Feasible Projects $1,004 M
Difference $2,210 M
DRAFT* Assumes operating needs phased in over life of plan
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Funding Set-Aside for Other Projects• $80 M reserved for 2016 - 2035• For Congestion Management Projects, to be
determined:– Sidewalk Projects– Multi-Use Trail Projects– Intersection Improvements– Intelligent Transportation System Enhancements
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Questions / Comments Action Requested: Approve Draft Cost
Feasible Plan for Public Distribution & Feedback The Citizens and Technical Advisory
Committees recommend that the TPO Board approve the 2035 MVP Draft Cost Feasible Plan.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
End Presentation
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Project Evaluation Criterion Assessment Scoring (Points)
Project Completes:
Sidewalk Top 100 In Top 100 = Y 1
Sidewalk Gap Fills Sidewalk Facility Gap/Need = Y 1
Bicycle Top 100 In Top 100 = Y 1
Bicycle Facility Gap Fills Bicycle Facility Gap/Need = Y 1
Project Connects Directly to:
Airport Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Park & Ride Lot Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Transit Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Regional Intermodal Hub Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Regional Activity Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Freight Activity Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
High Speed Rail Station Y=Direct Connection/Access 1
Project is Within:
Environmental Justice (EJ) Area F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None
F=2, P=1, N=0
Multimodal LOS District District I, II or III III=3, II=2, I=1
Transit Supportive Development Area
F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None
F=2, P=1, N=0
Transit Corridors and Centers Overlay
F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None
F=2, P=1, N=0
100-Year Flood Hazard Area H = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low
H=0, M=1, L=2
ETDM Environmental Screening Tool Analysis:
Potential Cumulative Degree of Effect
H = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low (see EST Results tab)
H=0, M=1, L=2
Project Evaluation Criterion Assessment Scoring (Points)
Project Enhances or Improves:
Evacuation Route Y = Evac Route 1Regional Road Network Y = on Regional Network 1Regional Transit Route Y = Serves regional or inter-county
transit route1
Strategic Intermodal System Facility Y = on SIS 1
Major Truck Route Y = on Truck Route 1Major Road Network Connectivity Y = Makes New Connection between
Major Roads1
Current Congestion LOS D; LOS E; LOS F; all others = A-C (based on 5 yr LOS)
F=5, E=3, D=1, A-C=0
Future Congestion Volume to Capacity Ratio (based on 2035 E+C Network V/C)
>1.50 = 5, 1.25 to 1.50 = 3, 1.00 to
1.24 = 1, <1.00 = 0
Safety Top 50 Crash Locations (2005 - 2009) # = Number of Locations
intersected by project
Public Involvement:
Public Input on Project Public comments received on facility or corridor (as of April 2010)
# = Number of times cited as need
in surveys
Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology (Cont’d.)•Environmental Screening GIS Tool Used to Evaluate Potential Degree of Effect on Natural & Man-Made Environment•Analyzed project impact within 500’ buffer•Scores based on # of features found or % of buffer area falling within:
Wetland Areas Recreational Areas
Wildlife & Habitat Areas Prime Farmlands
Flood Hazard Areas Historic/Arch. Sites
Special Areas (e.g. Green Swamp Contaminated Sites
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
2030 TRIP 2035 MVP
Criteria Relative Weight Criteria Relative Weight
Existing Congestion
12.5% Efficiency & Interconnectivity
20%
Future Congestion 12.5%
Freight/Economic Competitiveness
20% Freight & Goods Movement
15%
Community Impacts
10% Multi-Modal System Dev.
15%
Environmental Impacts
10% Environmental Sustainability
20%
Safety 20% Safety & Security 20%
Project Status 10% Regional Support 5%
Short-Term Need 5% Public Input 5%
Total 100% Total 100%
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d)
•Relative Weight (%) assigned to each category divided by maximum points for that category to arrive at weighted scores
•Ranking based on weighted scores
•Ranked project list divided into Tiers I, II and III
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Yellow indicates Change Since March
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Yellow indicates Change Since March
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
FDOT Costing Tool Examples
Project Area Description Constr. Cost Estimate
Rural New 2L Undivided Road w/ 5’ Paved Shoulder
$4,524,370 per Centerline Mile
Urban Widen 2L to 4L w/ 4’ Bike Lane & 6’ Sidewalk
$5,763,328 per Centerline Mile
Urban Widen 4L to 6L w/ 4’ Bike Lane & 6’ Sidewalk
$6,349,351 per Centerline Mile
Rural Diamond Interchange over Rural Divided Crossroad
$24,659,686 per Interchange
Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan
August 2010
Capital Operating
State Hwy. Projects $5,117 M
Local Road Projects $2,031 M
Bus Transit Projects $180 M $51.9 M*
Rail Transit Projects $1,824 M $21.4 M*
Bike/Ped/Trail Projects
Preliminary Cost Estimates (2010 $)
* Annual Operating Costs At Build-Out