POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID, 1991-1992

14
Chapter 2, In The Book: “Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health” By: Marion Nestle Presented By: Samantha Privratsky

description

POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID, 1991-1992. Chapter 2, In The Book: “Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health”  By: Marion Nestle Presented By: Samantha Privratsky. The Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health Through Food Guidelines. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID, 1991-1992

Page 1: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

Chapter 2, In The Book: “Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health”

 By: Marion Nestle

Presented By: Samantha Privratsky

Page 2: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

• Conflict of interest by USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) when aiming to protect agriculture AND to advise the public about diet and health issues

• Marion Nestle exemplifies this issue through her analysis of the 1991 Food Pyramid Controversy

Page 3: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

(1991)USDA Secretary, Edward R. Madigan, rejected the Printing of the latest, The Eating Right Food Pyramid, because he claimed that, “It is confusing to Children.”

Page 4: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

(1956-1979)The Basic Four Guide (1991) The Eating

Right Pyramid

Servings: (some serving sizes unknown) Meat = 2-3 servings Milk = 2-3 cups Vegetables = 3-5 servings Fruit = 2-4 Grain = 6-11

Explicitly hierarchical: majority of foods from grain, vegetables, fruit; image suggests eating less meat and dairy than the other food groups

The relative size unity suggests that a person should eat an equal amount of all four food groups, even if the suggested servings read differently

Servings(some serving sizes unknown): Meat 2-3 servings; 4-6 ounces/servngmilk 2-3 cups; Vegetables/Fruit = 4 or moreGrain = 4 or more

Page 5: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

• In 1992 the USDA came out with a revised image of the “Eating Right” Pyramid after 1 year of further research and incessant publicity• Spent 1 Million Dollars only to confirm the previous research conducted by the DHEW:

• Even though the meat and dairy producers preferred the Bowl image guidelines because the shape suggested greater equality among food groups, Research showed the pyramid image providing the most clarity and understanding for the general public

• Only a few changes were made to The Eating Right Pyramid and yet the USDA secretary justified the costs, “We spent 855,000 on comprehensive tests to answer concerns raised by commodity groups, nutritionists, and health care professionals…..The results clearly indicate that the “Food Guide” was the most effective symbol” (Secretary Madigan, April, 28, 1992).

Page 6: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

THE FOOD GUIDE PYRAMID (1992)Changes made on image from 1991-1992:

• •Title (‘Eating Right’ to ‘Food Guide’) due to Complaints from Kraft Foods

•Recommended servings located outside the pyramid and not within food groups

•Increase in meat serving size: “Basic Four” = 4-6oz•“Food Guide” = 5-7oz

Page 7: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

• 1977 Dietary Goals, Congress Under Pressure to support Health promotion :• to reduce chronic disease(Heart Disease, Diabetes, etc..)• prevent public nutrition deficiencies• reduce the cost of healthcare

•USDA and DHEW (Department of Health, Education, and Welfare) were competing for the control of nutrition education and research•USDA won this battle with the help of President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat ,who wanted control over these issues

Page 8: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

(1977) Farm Bill (Public Law 95-113), Congress granted USDA shared responsibilities over dietary advice to the public with DHEW(Department of Health, Education, and Welfare)

(1988) House Appropriations Committee reaffirmed USDA’s “lead agency” responsibility for dietary guidance

DHEW argued that more “appropriate” agencies , which work within the DHEW, should be responsible for education and research on diet and health, Agencies such as: Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Disease Control (CDC) National Health Institute of Health

Page 9: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

• USDA’s Human Nutrition Information Service (HNIS)• (1980 )Developed a Food Wheel Dietary Guideline based off of

serving size and daily servings per food group, however; the food industry requested to downplay any “eat less” suggestions

• (1988-89) developed the Pyramid symbol to focus on eating a variety of foods and not on “eating less”

• Research , focus groups, showed that participants easily caught on to the proportionality concept: people knew just by looking at the pyramid that they were supposed to eat more servings of bread than dairy

• The HNIS conducted nearly 10 years of extensive research• Pyramid Food Guide had passed six levels of USDA policy review and three divisional reviews; it was fully cleared for publication at every political level within USDA•Why did Secretary Madigan block the printing of the “Eating Right Pyramid?”

Page 10: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

•Wednesday, April 10th: “Eat Less Meat” Front page news due to Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine(PCRM) advocating for four new vegetarian food groups.•April 13th: publicity highlighting the “progress” achieved creating the Pyramid symbol because it suggests that we eat less meat and dairy and therefore will increase our health and wellbeing•April 15th: Secretary Madigan scheduled a meeting with the Cattlemen’s association two days after the Washington Post story appeared.

• Cattlemen among other trade associations were not content with their position on the pyramid and argued that it would negatively affect their business

Page 11: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

• Now Appears as an Icon, in education, nutrition, textbooks, but also in advertisements, cookbooks etc….

•The pyramid has developed food pyramids for ethnic and cultural groups to suit almost any dietary preference

•The Food Pyramid has not shown to be effective in meeting the 1977 “Dietary Goals” and lowered healthcare costs goals set by the USDA, therefore, further research is necessary.

Page 12: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

1956-1979 Basic Four

1980-1991 Eating Right Pyramid

1992-2005 The Food Guide Pyramid 2005 Food Pyramid

Page 13: POLITICS VERSUS SCIENCE OPPOSING THE FOOD PYRAMID,  1991-1992

•Website for MyPyramid contains a link to the new “Know your Farmer, know your Food”•Obama Administration giving funds to support local food within schools and in communities to benefit local farmers •Also funds to support EBT low income cards so they can have access to farmers markets and healthy local food.•There are many other food pyramid spin offs from the original 1992, and 2005 versions which are specifically science based anddo not agree with the USDA versions.