Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

download Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

of 8

Transcript of Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

  • 7/28/2019 Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

    1/8

    1

    Commonwealth Executive Master of Business Administration

    &

    Commonwealth Executive Master of Public Administration

    MCP1608 - Marketing Management

    Assignment

    Deadline for Submission: 10th

    March 2010

    Mini Project

    Recently Sri Lankans experienced a presidential election.

    Critically evaluate one of the candidates propaganda in

    marketing perspective. You can use any marketing concept

    /strategy for your evaluation,

    Your answer should not exceed 1500 words.

  • 7/28/2019 Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

    2/8

    2

    Recently held presidential election of Sri Lanka was an election that captured attention

    much attention of twenty million Sri Lankan masses as well as rest of the world. This was

    the first time Sri Lanka experienced a presidential election after successfully crushing and

    defeating terrorists who fought for a separate state in north and east of the island, at the

    bank of Nandikadal lagoon of the east coast of Sri Lanka. So before few months to the

    declaration of presidential election, it seemed popularity of ruling alliance of the

    president Mahinda Rajapaksa was at its peak and they won two third majority in

    provincial elections. Knowing the fact president Rajapaksa called for an early presidential

    election and a landslide victory was anticipated.

    But with the declaration of 5th

    presidential election of Sri Lanka, opposition

    parties tactically formed an alliance and nominated former army commander who

    wedged the war against terrorists successfully as the common candidate of opposition

    parties, against Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa.

    Thus once it seemed to be an easy victory was turned to a deadly street fight

    where the victory was needed to be hard earned either by former president or army

    commander. At least this was the picture seen by Colombo centered Sri Lankan society

    and interested international parties. At this context both candidates had to address voting

    segments that were not owned by them, their supporting parties or else in other words it

    was needed to widen existing market share (votes) of a candidate in order to get a

    breakthrough and a clear victory.

    Thus the war on presidency of island nation freed recently from terrorism was

    begun. Finally former president Mahinda Rajapaksa managed to have a clear victory by

    defeating his major opponent common candidate of the opposition alliance. When

    Colombo centered society and the media were anticipating a close range fight between

    ruling party and opposition alliance candidates, how Mahinda Rajapaksa managed to

    record a clear victory is something attracting interest of study.

    Therefore here it is going to evaluate President Mahinda Rajapaksa s election

    campaign in a political marketing perspective for understanding president Rajapaksa

    market his politics and himself in order to attract desired out come votes.

  • 7/28/2019 Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

    3/8

    3

    One major brand that is being marketed since 2005 presidential election was

    Patriotism, was again re launched as the flagship brand of the political marketing

    campaign of Mahinda Rajapaksa for 2010 presidential election also. Several famous

    products like admiring war efforts made by UPFA government and Mr.Rajapaksa sleadership as a president for liberating north and east people from terrorism, anti western

    slogans, Api Wawamu Rata Nagamu program, recognizing and admiring Aurveda /

    Sinhala medicine and related things, Mathata Thitha program and recognizing and

    admiring role of Buddhist clergies were launched under flagship brand called Patriotism.

    Same brand manager Mr.Wimal Weerawansa who worked for Mr. Rajapaksa in 2005 for

    the same brand Patriotism with proven spectacular success records of capturing the target

    market in the island, was again employed with higher sales targets.

    It can be observed that in 2010 presidential election campaign Mr. Rajapakse

    wanted to capture market segments like Politicians, activists/ supporters undecided

    voters, non voters and opposition with the brand of Patriotism. Further various

    demographic segments like senior citizens (Jesta Purawasi), Youth, professionals, women

    were addressed.

    When it comes to consider Politicians segment, even though it was not known and

    clear to the masses what was went on behind the screen, last minutes crossover of UNP

    chief organizer S. B. Dissanayke and prominent Kurunehegala district parliamentarian

    Johnston Fernando, were made to seen by public as attractions to this Patriotism brand.

    So in political marketing context, those moves can be considered or at least can be seen

    as results of successful implementation of marketing strategies. Those two moves were

    huge blows for the opposition alliance while giving vital strategic and propaganda sense

    advantages to Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa led ruling alliance. Although there were lots of

    rumors regarding those cross over, both parliamentarians could save their faces as there

    had been a fine wall of Patriotism created for them to cover. Furthermore it can be seen

    that same patriotism brand acted as a huge barrier to exit for ruling party politicians who

    wanted to join with opposition alliance specially with UNP. This is evident that formercricket captain Arjuna Ranatunga who joined with the common candidate at the

    presidential election now contesting as a candidate of JVP led coalition with lot of

    uncertainty of getting elected, still without joining with UNP where he may have more

  • 7/28/2019 Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

    4/8

    4

    chance of getting elected to the parliament. This situation shows the success of targeting

    and implementation of Patriotism brand in the event of creating a barrier to exit for the

    Politician segment of the country.

    Some professional categories like actors, singers, Aurvedic doctors, teachers,

    nurses and some grades of government workers like Gramaniladari were also address and

    attracted via Patriotism brand. Here Mr. Rajapaksa had a tactical advantage as the

    incumbent president for organizing large gathering of selected professional categories at

    the Temple Trees and promoting his brand through his brand manager Wimal and sales

    managers like Champika among the gathered crowd who later to covey massage of the

    brand as well as image of Mr.Rajapaksa to entire country.

    Potential of this campaign was early recognized by opposition parties and

    requested intervention of election commissioner by pointing out those activity as

    violations of election rules. But this threat was also tactically and effectively removed by

    Mr. Rajapaksa s camp by interpretation of treating people in any time any where as atradition of Sinhala Buddhist culture. In fact as a common belief Sinhala Buddhist are

    expected to do Dhana whenever possible. So president also has the right of following

    ancient tradition of the nation. Here despite of logic of the argument and despite of

    harmfulness of tactics in the future, in political marketing perspective, this also can be

    considered as a brilliant move of Mr. Rajapakse in the event of promoting his Patriotism

    brand among the people. Furthermore this situation strengthened the already established

    image of Mr.Rajapaksa as a Sinhala Buddhist country man among the crowd in the

    peripheral.

    When segments like non voters and undecided voters are considered, for non

    voters, it is needed to communicate importance of being active voters and for undecided

    voters, it should be needed to persuade them importance of voting for the former

    president in 2010 presidential election.

    Mr. Rajapaksa could secure support of majority of famous artists in the country

    with him. Most of actors and singers actively supported 2010 presidential election

    campaign of Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa. Tharunyata Hetak that appeared to be newly setup youth front of Sri Lanka Freedom Party, strategically had organized massive

    television and radio advertisement campaign using singers and actors who were

  • 7/28/2019 Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

    5/8

    5

    supporting election campaign of the former president. When the nature of that massive

    advertisement campaign is closely considered in a political marketing context, it can be

    seen that whole advertisement campaign was largely an undifferentiated campaign

    through which most of famous actors, players and singers of the country appealed

    common masses for voting with them to Mr. Rajapaksa in this presidential election.

    The main theme of advertisement campaign was introducing Mr. Rajapaksa as a

    sensitive and experienced leader and also it could be seen that some emphasis had been

    put to introduce 2010 presidential election as a crucial election country facing so far since

    the election. Therefore potential undecided voters were encouraged to vote for Mr.

    Rajapasa in the coming crucial election and non voters were made understood this as an

    important moment of the history of the country and being an active voter as a duty of

    every responsible citizen of the country. Furthermore this advertisement campaign

    strengthened major Patriotism brand of Mr. Mahinda Rajapakse among people. And also

    this massive undifferentiated advertisement campaign itself was a barrier to entry for

    opposition parties.

    It can be concluded that this advertisement campaign may had affected on voters

    segments like potential undecided voters and not voters positively. Over 80% of postal

    voters had cast their ballots and over 74% of total eligible voters had come to polling

    stations for voting in Election Day for voting. Voting percentage was even higher than

    this in most of southern districts of the country where majority is Sinhalese. Again this

    shows powerfulness of capturing various market segments with flagship brand Patriotism

    and success of bringing potential voters and non voters to polling stations through that

    massive Tharunyata Hetak advertisement campaign. State owned television and radio

    channels which have largest coverage island wide were largely employed for this

    advertisement campaign in order to have a largest possible market penetration. Although

    there were some allegations of using state owned properties for only shake of president sparty, it seems that majority in the peripheral of the country was not much conscious

    about them. As here it is not intend to examine ethics of using public property for private

    use, act of selecting media having largest coverage in target audience and hiring that

    media to convey desired massage to target audiences in a cost effective manner are

    understandable.

  • 7/28/2019 Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

    6/8

    6

    In order to secure and maintain support and loyalty of activist and supporters

    segment it is needed to maintain a strong relationship with them. Most of supporters and

    activist of Mr. Rajapaksa s election campaign were from Sri Lanka Freedom Party that isthe largest party of the ruling alliance. Therefore as an important step of building up a

    strong relationship with party activist, a large party gathering was organized at the

    Sugathadasa stadium for SLPF supporters and activists. And there Mr. Rajapaksa was

    reelected as the chairman of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party. Further activist were made to

    request for a presidential election from Mr. Rajapaksa who agreed as everybody expected

    brilliantly conducting himself as a peoples leader.This occasion was utilized for another important event of Mr. Rajapaksa s

    election campaign. That was the launch of the Mahinda Chinthanaya 2 (SubaAnagathayak) manifesto, aiming coming presidential election. Since then main theme of

    UPFA government was a brighter future Suba Anagathayak.Furthermore this manifesto that was used to address some psychographic and

    demographic segments was distributed island wide through party supporters and activists

    via door to door canvassing.

    Through Brighter Future manifesto Mr. Rajapakse seemed to be launching his

    next brand for the market named voters of Sri Lanka. This new brand was the

    Development and products like Flyovers, Southern Lanka Expressway, Hambantota port,

    Kerawalapitiya & Norochchole Power Plants, Moragaha Kandda project and Colombo

    south harbor were marketed under his Development brand. This product line was

    promoted basically through televisions, radios and public speeches as an undifferentiated

    promotional campaign. But when the situation was closely examined, it can be observed

    that through this product line of Mr. Rajapaksa s political marketing campaign, more

    focusing had been made to capture votes at the center. In other words this Development

    brand is more to market in city based voting segments like professionals, merchants and

    investors. Furthermore this new Development brand was also employed to strengthen the

    market of flagship brand Patriotism. It can be seen that Mr. Rajapaksa achieved

    considerable market share among city based voters also through his new brand

    Development, this was evident by his victories of Colombo and Kandy suburbs

  • 7/28/2019 Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

    7/8

    7

    electorates that led him to have an overall victory of Colombo and Kandy districts once

    known as fortresses of UNP led opposition alliance.

    In the presidential election campaign of Mr. Rajapaksa, it can be noticed that

    higher priorities had been made in addressing voting segment of opposition party voters

    who were opposition party supporters, activist and potential opposition party voters. This

    voting segment negatively advocated Mr. Rajapaksa s election campaign. So those were

    the people to be made neutral. For the purpose of achieving this target, negative

    campaigning and distribution of disinformation targeting this segment were done.

    In order to prevent support of potential opposition party supporters support going

    for the common candidate, threat of possible military dictatorship in the island was

    shown. This campaign was supported by showing and pointing flaws in personal

    character of opposition party candidate using ex-service men and women of the army via

    radio and television. Films made to disgrace the times of Idi Amine and Hitler were

    telecasted over and over again through state TVs. Mahinda Abeysundare wrote

    Watarauma and Wimasuma to state TV channels and Hudson Samarasinha conducted Rata Yana Atha in sate radios basically for disinformation and negative campaigningfor the purpose of neutralizing opposition party supporters. Voting percentage among

    ethnic Tamil voters in North was remarkably low. Here our interest only goes to examine

    Mr. Rajapaksa s election campaign in marketing point of view, it can be concluded this

    negative campaigning program also had its success.

    Although it can be observed that some greater attempts were being made for

    attracting some demographic segments like upcountry Tamil plantation workers through

    coalitions made with Chandrasekaran and Thondaman, Eastern ethnic Muslims through

    Athaulla and Ferial team, Eastern Tamils via coalition with Chandrakanthan and Karuna

    and Wanni and Northern Tamils via Devanada, Mr. Rajapaksa s major target market inthe election was Shinhala Buddhist voters at the peripheral of the country.

    When election results were examined it can be seen that positioning of Mr.

    Rajapakse s brand in this segment was with spectacular success. Especially Sinhalapeople were made to have a thought that voting for Mr. Rajapaksa as a duty of them in

    return of his favor of giving strong leadership to eliminate terrorism.

  • 7/28/2019 Political Marketing of presidential election 2010

    8/8

    8

    Finally it can be concluded Mr.Rajapaksa as a very good political marketer who have

    understood Sri Lankan market voters very well. He had known gravity can be made byvoters in the peripheral of the country. More or less Sri Lanka is still a large village in

    which people are still largely influenced by Sinhala Buddhist tradition. Media like

    Twitter and Face book only have touched few spots in this village. So campaign based on

    WWW had no dominance role as far as local voters are concerned. Mr. Rajapaksa and his

    team had understood this ground reality of the market. So that is why when UNP (now

    with a leader from Colombo elite class) selected democracy, good governance, and anti corruption conducts as major brands of opposition common candidate and JVP (failed to

    judge the market correctly and select appropriate strategy) supported above brands whole

    heartedly, Mr. Rajapaksa selected development and patriotism for the Sri Lankan market

    of which majority of voters coming from rural areas and backgrounds.

    Finally as everywhere else in the business world in this business also marketerwho understood his market correctly and had proper action plan to capture targeted

    market segments achieved his target a brighter future.

    REFERANCE:

    1. www.mahindarajapaksa.com2. www.sarathfonseka.com/3. http://www.lankalibrary.com/pol.html4. http://www.bath.ac.uk/management/research/pdf/2004-01.pdf

    By W.M.B.T.Chandrasekara

    http://www.mahindarajapaksa.com/http://www.mahindarajapaksa.com/http://www.mahindarajapaksa.com/http://www.mahindarajapaksa.com/http://www.sarathfonseka.com/http://www.sarathfonseka.com/http://www.sarathfonseka.com/http://www.sarathfonseka.com/http://www.lankalibrary.com/pol.htmlhttp://www.bath.ac.uk/management/research/pdf/2004-01.pdfhttp://www.bath.ac.uk/management/research/pdf/2004-01.pdfhttp://www.bath.ac.uk/management/research/pdf/2004-01.pdfhttp://www.lankalibrary.com/pol.htmlhttp://www.sarathfonseka.com/http://www.mahindarajapaksa.com/