Politeness

14
Linguistic Politeness Muhammad Azam Research Scholar COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Lahore, Pakistan

Transcript of Politeness

Page 1: Politeness

Linguistic Politeness

Muhammad AzamResearch Scholar

COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Lahore, Pakistan

Page 2: Politeness

Definition

• Held (2005)

• Politeness may be understood as a specific type of linguistic structure, which “expresses the speaker´s attitude and are thus not explicable by semantic, but rather by pragmatic means”

Page 3: Politeness

Definition

• Yule (1996, p. 59)

• A linguistic interaction is necessarily a social interaction. Thus, participants do not only convey meaning but also observe social rules and their utterances are shaped also by social distance and closeness.

Page 4: Politeness

Political Behaviour

• “Thank you” or “Have a nice day” or address terms “sir” and “madam” as polite,

• Watts (2003) groups them under the term “politic behaviour”.

• The politic behaviour is a standard behaviour expected by society in certain situations. Its omission would be considered as impolite, rather than neutral behaviour.

Page 5: Politeness

Political Behaviour

• “Thank you” or “Have a nice day” or address terms “sir” and “madam” as polite,

• Watts (2003) groups them under the term “politic behaviour”.

• The politic behaviour is a standard behaviour expected by society in certain situations. Its omission would be considered as impolite, rather than neutral behaviour.

Page 6: Politeness

Politeness Models

• Social norm model• Robin Lakoff

• Her model of politeness is highly rationalist and leans on Grice´s Cooperation Principle.

• Two rules are given: be clear and be polite. According to these rules, utterances can be classified as “well-formed or non-well-formed”

Page 7: Politeness

Politeness Models

• Conversational maxim model• it is not sufficient to use the Cooperative Principle as

the sole criterion for explaining the relation between sense and force and he introduces Politeness Principle.

Page 8: Politeness

Politeness Models

• Tact Maxim: Minimize cost to other, Maximize benefit to other• Generosity Maxim: Minimize benefit to self, Maximize cost to

self• Approbation Maxim: Minimize dispraise of other, Maximize

praise of other• Modesty Maxim: Minimize praise of self, Maximize dispraise of

self• Agreement Maxim: Minimize disagreement between self and

other, Maximize agreement between self and other• Sympathy Maxim: Minimize antipathy between self and other,

Maximize sympathy between self and other (Leech, 1983, p. 132).

Page 9: Politeness

Politeness Models

• Conversational contract model• Fraser and Nolen

• Politeness is seen as acting according to requirements of the conversational contract. Participants´ rights and obligations represent the substance of the contract and “every individual on entering a social interaction, must recognise a set of rights and obligations which determine how s/he is meant to behave.

Page 10: Politeness

Brown and Levinson´s Politeness Theory

• The use of politeness is seen as deliberate and free decision of the individual based on consideration of context and the face wants of involved participants.

• Face and face threatening acts• Every member of society has a public self image, or “face”.

– It represents the way a person is perceived and since it is not a constant value and it continually develops, it has to be attended to in interaction.

Page 11: Politeness

Brown and Levinson´s Politeness Theory

• In the process of maintaining face, every person has two aims:

• saving their own face (defensive orientation)• saving others´ faces (protective orientation)• Face consists of two aspects,

• positive face is the want to be independent and not imposed on by others.

• negative face Positive face is less obvious and it denotes the want to be accepted and liked, to be treated as a member of the same group, and to know that one´s wants are shared by others

Page 12: Politeness

Negative politeness strategies

• Brown and Levinson list following 10 strategies that make use of negative politeness:

• 1. Be conventionally indirect• 2. Question, Hedge• 3. Be pessimistic• 4. Minimize the imposition• 5. Give deference• 6. Apologize• 7. Impersonalize S and H, avoid the pronouns “I” and “you”• 8. State the FTA as a general rule• 15• 9. Nominalize• 10. Go on record as incurring a debt, or as not indebting H (1987, p. 131).

Page 13: Politeness

Positive politeness strategies• 1. Notice, attend to H• 2. Exaggerate (interest, approval, sympathy with hearer)• 3. Intensify interest to H• 4. Use in-group identity markers• 5. Seek agreement• 6. Avoid disagreement• 7. Presuppose/raise/assert common ground• 8. Joke• 9. Assert or presuppose S´s knowledge of and concern for H´s wants• 10. Offer, promise• 11. Be optimistic

Page 14: Politeness

Positive politeness strategies• 12. Include both S and H in the activity• 13. Give (or ask for) reasons• 14. Assume or assert reciprocity• 15. Give gifts to H (goods, sympathy, understanding, cooperation) (Brown

&• Levinson, 1987, p. 102)