Policy Brief - World Health Organization · Screening for Disease, which was published as a World...
Transcript of Policy Brief - World Health Organization · Screening for Disease, which was published as a World...
Policy Brief
Screening in Europe
by
Walter W HollandSusie Stewart
Cristina Masseria
The views expressed by authors or editors do notnecessarily represent the decisions or the stated policies of the European Observatory on HealthSystems and Policies or any of its partners.
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this policy brief do not imply theexpression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Observatory on Health Systems andPolicies or any of its partners concerning the legalstatus of any country, territory, city or area or of itsauthorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Where the designation“country or area” appears in the headings of tables,it covers countries, territories, cities, or areas. Dottedlines on maps represent approximate border lines forwhich there may not yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the EuropeanObservatory on Health Systems and Policies in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, thenames of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
The European Observatory on Health Systems andPolicies does not warrant that the information contained in this policy brief is complete and correctand shall not be liable for any damages incurred asa result of its use.
© World Health Organization 2006, on behalf of the EuropeanObservatory on Health Systems and Policies
All rights reserved. The EuropeanObservatory on Health Systems andPolicies welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translateits publications, in part or in full (see address on inside back cover).
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
Screening in Europe*
The attack on disease must not be meddlesome; the desire to do something must be guided by sure argument that good will come of it.
Gibson AG. The Physician’s Art. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1933
INTRODUCTION
The concept of screening in health care – that is, actively seeking to identifya disease or pre-disease condition in individuals who are presumed andpresume themselves to be healthy – grew rapidly during the twentiethcentury and is now widely accepted in most of the developed world. Usedwisely, it can be a powerful tool in the prevention of disease. But it isessential to observe the long-established principles and criteria and resistthe introduction of screening practices that do not meet these requirements.
We begin this summary by outlining the historical background to screeningand by looking at some definitions of the practice based on experience inthe United States and the United Kingdom but relevant more widely. We goon to examine the criteria for screening and its evaluation and the benefitsand disadvantages of the practice. We then consider a number of keyissues that are relevant at all stages and to every type of screening in anycountry. Finally, we look at current screening practices within the EuropeanUnion (EU), using the United Kingdom as a model, before drawing anumber of general conclusions.
Historical background
The benefits of screening for disease prevention were first demonstrated in the 1940s by the use of mass miniature radiography (MMR) for theidentification of individuals with tuberculosis (TB). After the end of theSecond World War, when effective treatment for TB was introduced, the use of MMR became widespread in many western countries, including theUnited States and the United Kingdom.
Policy brief
1
* Based on Holland WW, Stewart S (2005). Screening in Disease Prevention: What Works?Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd in association with The Nuffield Trust and the EuropeanObservatory on Health Systems and Policies.
Gradually the concept of screening began to be considered equallyapplicable to the prevention of other diseases. The United States led theway, and in 1961 Thorner and Remein of the US Public Health Servicepublished the first comprehensive review of the principles of screening.1
In 1968, Wilson and Jungner produced their Principles and Practice ofScreening for Disease, which was published as a World HealthOrganization monograph.2 This remains a landmark contribution to thescreening literature.
In the late 1960s, screening came to the forefront of the health agenda inthe United Kingdom. The Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust convened aworking party on screening under the chairmanship of Professor TomMcKeown. The report highlighted two main conclusions.3 First, evaluation often screening procedures had revealed that in six of these, at least some ofthe basic principles and criteria were not being met; second, that theexisting research and administrative framework for screening wasinadequate and needed to be strengthened. The unmanaged introduction ofscreening for cervical cancer, for example, illustrated very clearly the needfor national planning and coordination before any programme could beintroduced into the National Health Service or any other health care system.
In this context, the Ministry of Health created a Joint Standing Committee onScreening in Medical Care but, although this met between 1969 and1980, its terms of reference were purely advisory and its authority andeffectiveness were limited. The establishment in 1996 of the UnitedKingdom National Screening Committee (NSC) filled this planning gap andcreated a mechanism to influence the implementation and evaluation ofeffective national screening programmes and to identify areas for furtherresearch. The NSC reports to ministers and represents an important centralreference point for all considerations of screening in the United Kingdom.4
This provides an important model for other countries.
DEFINITIONS
There have been various definitions of screening over the years and anumber of the most commonly used in the United States and the UnitedKingdom are summarized in Table 1.
Put simply, what we are talking about in screening is seeking to identify adisease or pre-disease condition in apparently healthy individuals. The mostrecent definition from the UK NSC7 introduces the risk to benefit concept,
2
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
acknowledging that screening can harm as well as help – a responseperhaps to the increasing public climate of complaint and litigation. It isimportant also to distinguish between population screening (where peoplethought to be at risk are invited for screening, as in the nationalprogrammes for cancer of the breast and cervix), and opportunisticscreening for prevention or case-finding (where individuals have sought
3
Source Definition
US Commission on Screening is the presumptive identification of Chronic Illness unrecognized disease or defect by the application of (1957)5 tests, examinations or other procedures, which can
be applied rapidly. Screening tests sort out apparentlywell persons who apparently have a disease from those who probably do not.
McKeown (1968)3 Screening is medical investigation which does not arise from a patient’s request for advice for a specific complaint.
Wilson and Jungner Mass screening is the large-scale screening of whole(1968)2 population groups. Selective screening is screening
of certain high-risk groups in the population. Multiphasic screening is the administration of two or more screening tests to large groups of people. Surveillance is long-term observation of individual populations. Case-finding is screening of patients already in contact with the health services to detect disease and start treatment. Early disease detection refers to all types of screening.
NSC – First Report Screening is the systematic application of test or (1998)6 inquiry to identify individuals at sufficient risk of a
specific disorder to warrant further investigation or direct preventive action among persons who have not sought medical attention on account of symptoms of that disorder.
NSC – Second Report Screening is a public health service in which (2000)7 members of a defined population, who do not
necessarily perceive that they are at risk of, or are already affected by, a disease or its complications, are asked a question or offered a test to identify those individuals who are more likely to be helped than harmed by further tests or treatment to reduce the risk of disease or its complications.
Table 1: Definitions of screening
medical advice for a specific symptom or complaint and opportunity istaken to suggest various other tests, such as the measurement of bloodpressure or cholesterol, appropriate to their age and sex).
CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
The basic criteria to be fulfilled before screening for any condition isintroduced have been stated clearly over many years. They are fundamentalto the integrity of the screening process in any country. They are reproducedin full on the UK National Screening Committee’s web site (www.nsc.nhs.uk),and are summarized in Table 2.
Evaluation must also be an integral part of any screening procedure. In1971, Cochrane and Holland8 suggested seven criteria for evaluation andthese remain as valid today as they were then (Table 3).
BENEFITS AND DISADVANTAGES
The benefits and disadvantages of screening have been fully described overthe years and have been elegantly summarized by Chamberlain9 (Table 4).
4
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Category Criteria
Condition The condition sought should be an important health problem whose natural history, including development from latent to declared disease, is adequately understood. The condition should have a recognizable latent or early symptomatic stage.
Diagnosis There should be a suitable diagnostic test that is available, safe and acceptable to the population concerned. There should be an agreed policy, based on respectable test findings and national standards, as to whom to regard as patients, and the whole process should be a continuing one.
Treatment There should be an accepted and established treatment or intervention for individuals identified as having the disease or pre-disease condition and facilities for treatment should be available.
Cost The cost of case-finding (including diagnosis and treatment) should be economically balanced in relation to possible expenditure on medical care as a whole.
Table 2: Summary of criteria for screening
5
Factor Criteria
Simplicity The test should be simple to perform, easy to interpret and,where possible, capable of use by paramedics and other personnel.
Acceptability Since participation in screening is voluntary, the test must be acceptable to those undergoing it.
Accuracy The test must give a true measurement of the condition or symptom under investigation.
Cost The expense of the test must be considered in relation to the benefits of early detection of the disease.
Repeatability The test should give consistent results in repeated trials.
Sensitivity The test should be capable of giving a positive finding when the individual being screened has the condition being sought.
Specificity The test should be capable of giving a negative finding when the individual being screened does not have the condition being sought.
Table 3: Summary of criteria for evaluation of screening
Benefits Disadvantages
Improved prognosis for some Longer morbidity in cases where prognosis iscases detected unaltered
Less-radical treatment which Overtreatment of questionable abnormalitiescures some early cases
Resource savings Resource costs
Reassurance for those with False reassurance for those with false-negative test results negative results
Anxiety and sometimes morbidity for those with false-positive results
Hazard of screening test itself
Source: Chamberlain.9 Reproduced by kind permission of the author and publisher.
Table 4: Benefits and disadvantages of screening
The benefits are straightforward. Early and accurate diagnosis andintervention will lead to an improved prognosis in some patients. At thisstage treatment may need to be less radical. Scarce health servicesresources will be saved by treating diseases before they progress, and thosewith true-negative test results can be reassured.
The disadvantages are more complex. There will be longer periods ofmorbidity for patients whose prognosis is unchanged and there may beovertreatment of non-serious conditions or abnormalities identified. There arealso resource costs in finding more illness both in terms of the tests themselves,the personnel costs and the subsequent management of whatever is found.There is the unpalatable certainty that some individuals with false-negativeresults will be given unfounded reassurance and that some with false-positive results will experience, at the very least, unnecessary anxiety and,at the worst, inappropriate treatment. Finally, there is the possibility,however remote, of hazard from the screening test itself.
There is a need for balance in the screening debate, between the extremesof enthusiasm and scepticism. Two points are particularly relevant here. The first is that there may be public demand (fuelled by vested interests) forthe introduction of a screening test that does not meet the establishedcriteria; an example of this is in screening for cancer of the prostate wherethe current screening test – prostate-specific antigen (PSA) – does not meetthe criteria for accuracy or specificity. The second point is that the rhetoricbehind the introduction of a screening programme may not match the realityof its implementation in routine practice; this is illustrated in screening fordiabetic retinopathy in Glasgow, Scotland, where retention of staff, non-attendance and over-referral of patients with minor defects are some of thepracticalities creating problems.10
KEY ISSUES IN SCREENINGThere are a number of key issues that are relevant at all stages and in everytype of screening programme in any country, and are closely interrelated.
Genetics
Genetic screening is an area that has developed very rapidly in recentyears with the mapping of the human genome. Many see it as opening upa new era in the prevention, early diagnosis and identification of disease.However, caution is essential.
6
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
The two most frequently cited objectives of screening for a recessive carrierstate, for example, are to reduce the prevalence of the disorder and toinform the reproductive choices of individuals and couples at risk.Information is thus regarded as worthwhile in itself, regardless of thepossibility of prevention or treatment. While this type of screening cancertainly help to evaluate risk and may be appropriate in certain high-riskgroups, if nothing can be done to alter the finding, the need for and use ofsuch information must be very carefully considered. Is it useful to diagnosewithout being able to treat?
The main purpose of genetic screening at present is to prevent rather thantreat disease. In this it differs from much current screening practice and itmust not be allowed to overlook the basic principles and criteria ofscreening. Open debate on the best way forward is urgent and the ethicaland human implications of the use of the human genome must beconsidered and patient autonomy safeguarded.
Information
Few would disagree that clear information about the benefits and harms ofany screening procedure should be available to all individuals invited toparticipate in any programme. In practice, however, this often involvesnothing more than providing a leaflet and possibly offering a briefdiscussion with a health professional with the emphasis on achieving apositive response. This is not enough.
Information provided should be based on results from respectable scientifictrials in a form that is acceptable, accessible and useful to those receivingit. There must be information about the whole screening process, includingfollow-up tests, some of which may be invasive and unpleasant. We shouldalso resist the current tendency towards “disease-mongering”, whereordinary and inevitable life processes, such as shyness and baldness, aretransformed into medical conditions amenable to treatment by those seekingto promote their products.
Information is thus another central concept in modern health care in generaland screening in particular. It must be provided not, as so often in the past,with the purpose of encouraging participation in a programme, but to givea balanced and understandable picture of the options and the possibleoutcomes, with the end-point being truly informed consent (or refusal) toparticipate.
7
Economics
Economic aspects of screening have come to the fore in the consideration ofscreening in the last decade. This is partly due to theoretical advances inthe application of economic principles in health services but also because ithas been realized that some screening procedures require large amounts ofresources with little benefit to the population. With the increase in theperception by both policy-makers and the public that stringent criteria mustbe applied before screening procedures are introduced, economic factshave been increasingly demanded in order to try to quantify the costs andbenefits in terms that are more readily understood.
As economic theory has entered the field, it has been increasinglyrecognized that screening is not a universal panacea and that it may alsodo harm. All screening procedures involve the examination and testing oflarge numbers of individuals in order to find the few with an abnormality.There are two main consequences of this.
First, those who undergo screening are often understandably anxious whilewaiting for the result and become even more anxious if they have toundergo further investigation. These further investigations may not be pain-or risk-free and people eventually found to be clear of disease may stillhave a residual anxiety that something may be wrong.
Second, although most screening tests are simple, relatively cheapprocedures in themselves, the actual costs are by no means trivial becauseof the large numbers involved. Some screening tests that are advocated(often by “for-profit” providers) – for example, whole-body scanning – areexpensive. Further investigation of those found to be positive on screening,many of whom will eventually prove negative, is also likely to be expensive.
A screening service provided for one population consumes resources thatwill be unavailable for use elsewhere. Economic approaches maydemonstrate conflicting aspects of policy decisions – for example,increasing efficiency may reduce equity. They may also highlight thediffering perspectives of providers, consumers and industry. In all healthservices, however funded, financial resources are, and will continue to be,insufficient; expert economic analysis and advice must be an integral part ofthe system and must help to guide policy.
8
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Ethics
Ethical considerations, such as the harm-to-benefit ratio, must be paramountwhenever a screening programme is being put forward for implementation.In all instances there are going to be disadvantages to some members ofthe population screened. All screening examinations are preliminary andwill involve further investigation to verify that those who screen positivereally do have the abnormality and require treatment (true positives), and toeliminate those who screen positive but do not actually have the abnormality(false positives). Those individuals with negative test results will not normallybe tested further, although some of them may actually have the abnormalityin question (false negatives). This obviously has serious implications.
Screening tests, even with all the safeguards, can never be foolproof andare subject to human and technical error and variation so that even withthe most thorough quality assurance mechanisms, mistakes will occur. Inany assessment of screening in a population an assessment has to be madeof the harm-to-benefit ratio.
Any abnormality identified, whether in a national screening programme orin primary care, must be treatable and the investigation itself must notcause harm. Many believe that early diagnosis, particularly of cancer andheart disease, will lead to the possibility of treatment and improvement inprognosis. This is an attractive concept and can lead to a demand for ascreening procedure to be introduced, irrespective of whether it has beenshown that diagnosis guarantees an improved outcome. The belief thatidentifying the presence of a condition equates with the ability to alter itsnatural history may beguile the public but is unfortunately false.
Through advances in technology, the potential for testing – particularly inthe field of genetics – is immense. However, the technical ability to performa screening procedure does not guarantee its ethical acceptability, as manyexperiments in other areas of science and medicine illustrate. More thanever before it is vital that the key principles on which screening should bebased remain in sharp focus.
Audit, evaluation and quality control
In any screening programme, as with any other service programme,adequate steps must be taken to ensure that the original objectives arebeing met and that the methodology meets appropriate standards.
9
The ideal method for evaluating a screening programme is the randomizedcontrolled trial in which individuals in a population are allocated, atrandom, either to a group that is screened or to a group that receives onlyits normal medical care. Randomized controlled trials are expensive anddifficult to manage and may also be ethically questionable in situationswhere the control group is denied treatment for the condition in question.Despite this, the UK National Screening Committee will only recommend theintroduction of any new screening programme after assessing the findings ofa properly conducted randomized controlled trial. The Committee alsokeeps all screening programmes under regular review to ensure that theycontinue to perform in the way intended and continue to be effective.
The components of an effectively organized screening programme havebeen described by Hakama11 and are summarized in Box 1.
The importance of maintaining the quality of screening programmes shouldnever be underestimated. Evaluation, audit and quality control should be anintegral part of any screening programme to ensure that it is achieving whatit has set out to do in a way that is acceptable to those involved.
CURRENT SCREENING PROGRAMMES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
We recommend the following screening programmes at each stage of thelife-cycle based on our experience in the United Kingdom. The situationvaries throughout the EU, as we illustrate in the next section.
Antenatal and neonatal screening*
Two issues should be emphasized in the context of antenatal screening. The first is that care must be taken not to medicalize this usually normalstage of life where most pregnancies have a successful outcome. The secondis that there must be full, balanced and understandable informationavailable for pregnant women and properly trained health professionalswith time to provide and/or explain it. This is important for all pregnantwomen but particularly for those who experience difficulty and defect.
Our recommendations for screening in the antenatal period are summarizedin Table 5.
10
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
* Key references: www.healthforallchildren.co.uk; www.nelh.nhs.uk/screening/child
11
• The target population should be identified.
• Individuals in the population who are to be screened need to be identified.
• All those eligible for screening should be encouraged to attend – for example,by issuing a personal invitation, and offering suitable timing of screeningexaminations to suit the needs of those involved.
• There should be adequate premises, equipment and staff to ensure that thescreening examination is done under pleasant circumstances and is acceptableto those attending.
• There should be an appropriate, satisfactory method of ensuring the maintenance of the best standards of the test(s) by:
i initial and continuing training of the personnel conducting the test(s);ii demonstration (by appropriate records) of the maintenance standards of
equipment used in the examination – for example, calibration of X-raymachines in mammography;
iii routine checks of the validity of the tests performed – for example, random duplicate measurements for biochemistry, cytology, and reading of X-rays.
• There should be adequate and appropriate facilities for the diagnosis andtreatment of any individual found to require this. There should be as littledelay as possible between the screening attendance, advice that thescreening test was negative, advice that the screening test result requiredfurther investigation, and referral to the appropriate centre for furtherinvestigation or treatment. A timetable should be established for these differentprocedures and there should be continuous monitoring to ensure that thetime intervals between the various stages are complied with.
• There should be regular checks to ascertain the satisfaction level of thosewho have undergone the screening process – those investigated, thescreen-negatives and those invited who have not participated.
• Finally, regular periodic checks should be made of the records of thescreened individuals to ascertain their adequacy.
Box 1: Components of an effectively organized screening programme
Screening procedures in the neonatal period can be divided into those thatare part of routine screening for all newborn babies either by clinicalexamination or biochemical tests and those procedures for conditions suchas hearing loss that will require separate testing. Our recommendations aresummarized in Table 6.
The UK National Screening Committee aims to produce a singlecoordinated Antenatal and Neonatal Screening Programme throughout thecountry and, while considerable progress has been made, much remains tobe done to improve the organization and equity of services for this lifestage.
12
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
RoutineAnaemiaBlood group and RhD status Blood test Early in pregnancy withHepatitis B effective follow-up for any HIV abnormalities identifiedRisk factors for pre-eclampsiaRubella immunitySyphilis
Asymptomatic bacteriuria Urine test As above
Fetal anomalies Ultrasound and Between 18 and 20 weeksAnencephaly blood test, if with effective follow-upSpina bifida indicated
Chromosome abnormalities Quadruple serum Second trimester withDown syndrome tests, ultrasound effective follow-up
High risk onlyThalassaemia/sickle cell diseaseTay-Sachs disease
Under research reviewDuchenne muscular dystrophyChlamydiaGestational diabetesFragile X syndromeHepatitis CGenital herpesHTLV1Streptococcus B
Table 5: Our recommendations for screening in the antenatal period
Screening and surveillance in childhood and adolescence*
Screening and surveillance (or observation) in childhood are important infollowing up difficulties already identified and in diagnosing disorders forwhich effective treatment is available. It should be a seamless extension ofantenatal and neonatal care and provides the opportunity for establishing abasis for good health in later life with appropriate advice on healthy eating,home and road safety, and immunization. All reasonable steps should betaken at this early stage to promote good health and prevent illness.
Our recommendations for screening in childhood are summarized in Table 7.
Childhood is the time to build on the care given in the antenatal andneonatal periods that should have identified any major problems andinstigated treatment where appropriate. Vigilance to find any abnormalitiesnot previously detected is important, but since the vast majority of children
13
Condition Comment
RoutineBloodspotPhenylketonuriaCongenital hypothyroidism Must be properly evaluatedCystic fibrosis In process of introduction for all neonatesSickle cell disease
Physical examinationCongenital heart disease Adequate training programmes in Congenital cataract physical examination must be developedCryptorchism
Congenital dislocation of the hip/ Use of ultrasound as primary screeningdevelopmental dysplasia of the hip test to be evaluatedOther congenital malformations
Other testsHearing impairment Implementation ongoing
Under research reviewBiotinidase deficiencyCongenital adrenal hyperplasiaDuchenne muscular dystrophy
Table 6: Our recommendations for screening in the neonatal period
* Key references: www.healthforallchildren.co.uk; www.nelh.nhs.uk/screening/child
are healthy, the focus should be on laying good foundations formaintenance of that health in the future. The growing problem of childhoodobesity is not at present a matter for screening, although advice on weightcontrol, exercise and healthy eating should be available in primary careand in school. Since weight/height measurements are taken regularly atvarious ages by GPs and in schools, action should be taken on the results totry to improve the diet of children and encourage their participation ingames and exercise rather than submitting them to a “screening” test.
The more deprived and disadvantaged children and those who have recentlyarrived from abroad as refugees or asylum seekers may have missed out onearlier medical and dental checks and strenuous efforts should be made toidentify them to make sure that any omissions or inequities are minimized.
14
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Condition Comment
Hearing impairment • Follow-up on neonatal programme where indicated
• School entry “sweep” test to continue • Case-finding to identify late onset or
progressive impairment• Investigation of any children with educational
or behavioural problems
Amblyopia and impaired • Orthoptist screening in 4–5-year-olds vision • Attention to be paid to children who miss
this test for any reason
Dental disease • School dental screening mandatory and should continue, but should be kept under research review
• Early contact with dentists to be encouraged• Problems include shortage of dentists and
lack of parental compliance, especially among the more deprived
Congenital hip dysplasia/ • Children identified by neonatal screening to developmental dysplasia of be reviewedthe hip (CHD/DDH) • Parental observations and concerns to be
investigated
Deprived, disadvantaged or • Need to identify such children and instigate socially isolated children screening/case-finding where relevant
Table 7: Our recommendations for screening in childhood
Screening in adolescents and young adults is another crucial area thatneeds to be approached with sensitivity. This is a period of life when formalcontact with the health service is infrequent for most individuals. But it isalso a time when individuals are coping with profound physical andemotional changes and seeking their independence, but often lack theexperience and judgement to use it wisely.
The margins between childhood and adolescence are becoming blurredwith many children appearing to mature earlier, physically, if notemotionally. It is a difficult period of adjustment towards adulthood and onethat is poorly understood, partly due to the difficulties of communication.The focus of screening and surveillance at this sensitive stage should takeaccount of what adolescents and young adults themselves feel they requireand how it can be most effectively provided. Among their main needs are:
• accessible confidential health services;• greater involvement in planning services;• health education that reflects their experiences, especially about drugs
and alcohol;• specialized advice centres for those with drug problems.
The most constructive approach in this age group is opportunistic case-finding in primary and community care with sensitive and confidentialadvice, support and health education provided in a way and at a placethat is acceptable and helpful to young people to enable them moresuccessfully to bridge the difficult gap between childhood and maturity.
The only screening programme that we would consider appropriate inadolescence and early adulthood is the opportunistic programme forChlamydia, as detailed in Table 8.
15
Condition Comment
Chlamydia Opportunistic screening of those aged 25 and under who access sexual health services or primary care
Table 8: Our recommendation for screening in adolescence and early adulthood
Screening in adults
Screening in adults is potentially big business. Media interest in health isinsatiable, and anyone who reads the newspapers, watches television orlistens to radio can hardly fail to be aware of the various diseases that maybe lying in wait for them. Of course, it is of benefit if potential healthproblems can be identified early and treated, or at least alleviated. Butsociety must beware of turning health into an obsession and must resist boththe increasing medicalization of life and the growing politicization ofmedicine. Above all, before any further national screening programme isintroduced, it must be clear that the long-established screening criteria aresatisfied and that the evidence base exists.
The national programmes for breast and cervical cancer should becontinued but kept under review with an emphasis on quality control and onproviding balanced and understandable information to enable women tomake a truly informed choice without pressure from health professionals onwhether or not to participate. Efforts must also be made to improvecoverage of those at highest risk.
A national programme of screening for colorectal cancer by faecal occultblood testing in adults aged from 50 to 74 years has been agreed in theUnited Kingdom but it is essential that adequate diagnostic, treatment andfollow-up facilities are in place before it is introduced.
Screening for risk factors of coronary heart disease and stroke should becarried out in the primary care setting with advice, treatment and follow-upas appropriate.
In the case of abdominal aortic aneurysm, it now seems clear thatultrasound screening in men aged 65 years and over would reducemortality from this condition, although the benefit for those aged over 75years has been questioned. As with colorectal cancer, however, nationalimplementation should await the certainty that adequate facilities andresources are available.
In the case of screening for diabetic retinopathy, close attention must bepaid to audit and the need to be absolutely clear about how, when andwhere to screen. Anecdotal evidence from Scotland suggests that the size ofthe problem may have been underestimated and that the reality ofimplementation does not match up to the rhetoric.
16
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Screening in adults is an area ripe for exploitation from private andcommercial sectors. It is essential that there is respectable scientific evidenceof benefit before any further programmes are introduced. Skrabanek’scontention that “medicine has no mandate to be meddlesome in the lives ofthose who do not need it”12 remains valid.
Our recommendations for screening in adults are summarized in Table 9.
Screening in the elderly
Society is facing a major challenge in how best to maintain health andquality of life in populations where the proportion of people aged over 60years now outnumbers those aged under 16 and the number of individualsaged over 85 is rising.
17
Condition Comment
Breast cancer National programme should be continued but kept under close review with emphasis on quality control, staff training and good information.
Cervical cancer National programme should be continued with review of alternative types of tests and of age range of those eligible and frequency of screening. Good information to be a priority.
Colorectal cancer National screening programme by faecal occult blood testing for adults aged 50–74 years.
Abdominal aortic Ultrasound screening of men aged 65 and over aneurysm seems a reasonable proposition provided the
necessary resources are in place.
Diabetic retinopathy National programme of screening for all diabetics aged over 12. It is essential to be quite clear about how, when and where screening should happen to ensure effective implementation.
Risk factors for Weight surveillance/case-finding approach incoronary heart disease primary care.(CHD)/strokeBlood pressureCholesterolSmoking cessation
Table 9: Our recommendations for screening in adults
A system of regular surveillance and case-finding in primary care wouldseem to be the most appropriate form of screening, particularly in thoseaged 75 and over, but the resource implications of this must be confronted.Several simple tests, such as identifying difficulties with sight or hearing orproblems with feet, can make a huge difference to the comfort and qualityof life. Depression is another area where identification and treatment couldimprove well-being. Social and community support are also vital in enablingolder people to enjoy as independent and contented a life as possible.
The emphasis in screening at this stage of life should be on improvingquality of life and preserving function and independence, rather than onproviding “heroic” treatments to prevent mortality.
Our recommendations for screening of the elderly in primary care aresummarized in Table 10.
SCREENING PRACTICE WITHIN THE EUIn this section we review briefly the position on screening in 28 countries,with regard, where relevant, to cervical, breast and colorectal cancers,phenylketonuria, Down syndrome, spina bifida, HIV, TB and Chlamydia.Detailed information on screening in the original 15 countries of the EU canbe found in Annexe 1; information on screening in the New Member Statesand the Candidate Countries of Turkey and Bulgaria is provided in Annexe2.
The screening situation across Europe is generally very different from that inthe United Kingdom because of the differing structures and financing ofhealth services. Few other countries have a single national body to review
18
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Physical assessment Mental assessment Social assessment
Hypertension Depression Falls Early heart failure Alcohol use Undernutrition Hearing loss Isolation Vision loss Incontinence Lack of physical activity Foot problems Review of medication
Table 10: Our recommendations for screening in the elderly
screening practice and policy, and population registers for recall andfollow-up of patients are also comparatively rare. Screening tends to betargeted at individuals rather than populations and not all countries adhereto the criteria summarized in Table 1. In many countries health serviceprovision is devolved to local or regional government and screeningpractice in different areas can vary widely as a result.
Antenatal screening: Down syndrome and spina bifida
The situation in relation to screening in the antenatal period in the UnitedKingdom has been described in the previous section and summarized inTable 5. Elsewhere in Europe screening at this stage of life seems to focuson Down syndrome and spina bifida.
In Denmark, from September 2004, pregnant women have had the optionof undergoing an examination to indicate risk of Down syndrome and ofhaving a test for spina bifida.
In Finland, participation in the screening of Down syndrome and spina bifidais voluntary. Almost all municipalities offer ultrasonic scanning for pregnancyin weeks 13–14 and 16–19. Amniocentesis and serum screening areprovided for women between 35 and 40 years of age (the age limit dependson the municipality – for example, in Helsinki the age limit is 40 years).
In France, Down syndrome is systematically screened for in prenatalexaminations. A blood test is offered to every pregnant woman.Amniocentesis is systematically offered to women considered to be at risk:mothers aged 38 years or over, those who have had abnormal blood testresults, defects detected in previous pregnancies, or where there arechromosomal anomalies in parents. Spina bifida is detected by ultrasoundin week 17 of pregnancy.
In Greece, pregnant women aged 35 years and over are offeredamniocentesis.
In Italy, guidelines are very vague but a test for Down syndrome isrecommended to all women at risk and for those aged over 35 years. Thetake-up of antenatal screening varies across regions.
In the Netherlands, tests for Down syndrome and spina bifida (triple tests) arerecommended for all women aged over 35 years at three months of pregnancy.
19
In Spain, antenatal screening is performed either in primary care or inhospital. The guidelines for monitoring a normal pregnancy include: triplescreening for Down syndrome and spina bifida, virus serology for hepatitisB, Rh incompatibility, virus serology for rubella and serology for Toxoplasmagondii. Amniocentesis is highly recommended for women over the age of35 years.
In Sweden, all pregnant women are offered one ultrasound scan in thesecond trimester (gestational weeks 15–20) and 97% of women comply.Women aged 35 years or older are given more detailed information by aphysician and are offered amniocentesis routinely.
In Bulgaria, a selective national antenatal screening programme is in place.Amniocentesis is offered free of charge to all pregnant women over 35years of age, to women who already have a child suffering from anycongenital malformation, and to those referred by a genealogist.
In the Czech Republic and Estonia, testing for spina bifida and Downsyndrome is part of basic screening during the prenatal period. Genetictesting is part of routine prenatal care for pregnant women over 37 years ofage and where indicated among younger pregnant women. Twoultrasounds are also part of the routine management of all pregnancies.
In Hungary, ultrasound examination for Down syndrome is carried out inweek 12 of pregnancy.
In Latvia, tests for Down syndrome are provided for pregnant womenconsidered at high risk in weeks 11 and 17 of pregnancy. High-risk groupsinclude women over 35 years of age; father over 45 years of age; one orboth parents previously affected by radiation; or those women who havehad an acute viral infection during the first trimester of pregnancy.
In Lithuania, screening for Down syndrome is performed only on thoseconsidered at risk, or if specifically requested. All pregnant women aged35 and over, those who have previously had babies with congenitalabnormalities, and those who request it are sent to the Human GeneticsCentre for a triple test which is performed during weeks 14–15 ofpregnancy. Routine ultrasound examinations are performed during weeks18–20 and 30–32 of pregnancy.
20
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Neonatal screening: phenylketonuria
The situation in relation to screening in the antenatal period in the UnitedKingdom has been described in the previous section and summarized inTable 6. The UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre was established in 2002 with a remit to monitor and improve the quality of newbornbloodspot screening procedures and their outcomes for parents and theirbabies.
In France, neonatal examination is routine for neonates. This includes bloodtesting for phenylketonuria, congenital hypothyroidism, adrenal hyperplasia,haemoglobinopathies/sickle cell anaemia and cystic fibrosis.
Screening for phenylketonuria is recommended in all countries belonging tothe EU before May 2004, except Finland, where screening of the nativeFinnish population is not considered necessary (screening is done, however,if both parents are of western European, American, or Jewish, Kurdish orYugoslavian origin). In the new Member States and Candidate Countries,screening for phenylketonuria is recommended in Bulgaria, the CzechRepublic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and Slovenia.
Breast cancer
The situation in relation to screening for cancer of the breast in the UnitedKingdom has been described in the previous section and is summarized inTable 9.
In Belgium, based on the directives developed by Europe Against Cancer,the three Communities and the Federal Government signed a protocol, inOctober 2000, to organize and finance a national campaign of breastcancer screening for women aged 50–69 years. The responsibility for thecoordination of the campaign rests with 11 recognized screening centres.There are five centres in Wallonia (one per province), five in Flanders (inthe four Flemish universities and in Bruges) and one in Brussels. Thescreening centres are responsible for making information available to thetarget group, sending out the invitations, retesting where necessary,recording data and reporting to the referring doctor. In Flanders thecampaign started on 15 June 2001, and in Wallonia and Brussels a yearlater.
In Denmark, screening programmes for breast cancer are established intwo of the 14 county councils (Funen and H:S) for women aged 50–69
21
years. These two screening programmes cover 20% of the targetpopulation.
In Finland, under the terms of the Public Health Act, women between theages of 50 and 59 years are invited every two years for breast screening.
In France, screening for breast cancer, previously limited to somedépartements (32 at the end of 2002), has been extended since January2004. Every woman between 50 and 74 years (except for those inGuyana) is invited for a free breast screening every two years. A strategicobjective of the Public Health Act, which came into force in August 2004, is to “reduce the percentage of late-stage breast cancer detected in women,notably by increasing the screening coverage rate up to 80% in womenaged between 50 and 74 years“. The Act calls for specific programmes totarget isolated, disabled or deprived women who might be reluctant toparticipate. This has been partly achieved by the production of audiovisualmaterials for people suffering from visual or hearing deficiencies, and bythe translation of brochures into community languages. Several campaignsat national and local levels are also planned. Patients’ and women’sassociations are involved in this information/distribution effort.
In Ireland, Phase 1 of BreastCheck, a national breast screening programme,started in February 2000 and already offers screening in several areas,with coverage expected to extend nationwide by the end of 2007. Breastscreening outside the BreastCheck programme is available to all women ifthey are referred by a GP.
In Italy, screening policies for breast cancer have been included in thepackage of essential levels of care provided by the national health system(Essential Level of Assistance) by Decree “DPCM 29/11/2001”. All nationalhealth plans have set targets for these areas of prevention. Registers aremanaged at regional level, however, and screening programmes are morewidespread in northern and central Italy. There is usually a system fortargeting and recalling patients, but the target population varies accordingto regional health plans so the position is varied.
In the Netherlands, there is a national programme for breast cancerscreening.
In Spain, since 1990 breast cancer detection programmes have beenimplemented in all Autonomous Communities. The programmes’ target
22
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
population varies across regions but in most it includes women aged 50–65years.
In Sweden, national guidelines from the National Board of Health andWelfare recommend mammography screening for early detection of breastcancer for women aged between 40 and 74 years. Examination intervals are18 months for women under 55 years, and 24 months for women over 55.
Among the new Member States, a pilot programme for breast cancerscreening has started in Cyprus and covers women aged 50–69 years.
In Estonia, there is a screening programme for breast cancer, financed andadministered by the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. The target populationis women aged 45–59 years, and the screening interval is three years.
In Hungary, mammography screening was introduced in 2002 for womenaged 45–65 years, and the procedure is repeated biannually with a goodparticipation rate.
In Latvia, screening for cancer is included in the prophylactic programmefor adults and covered through the health care budget. For breast cancer,women aged 50–69 years are recommended to undergo onemammography every two years.
In Slovakia, breast cancer screening is provided by the State and paid forby health insurance companies. The target population is women aged40–60 years and the method is periodic mammography.
Cervical cancer
The situation in relation to screening for cancer of the cervix in the UnitedKingdom has been described in the previous section and is summarized inTable 9.
In Denmark, screening for cervical cancer is available in all 14 countycouncils. Women in the age group 23–59 years are invited to participate,except in Copenhagen, where coverage is limited to those aged 25–45years.
In Belgium, a programme of cervical cancer screening has been runningsince 1994, when the Flemish Government decided to reorient the
23
organization of secondary prevention of cervical cancer according to theEuropean guidelines. The programme targets women aged between 25 and64 years, who are invited for a Pap smear every three years. The programmeis administered and evaluated by the Scientific Institute of Public Health incollaboration with the Communities. Despite scientific support, no formalscreening programme is organized in the French Community.
In Finland, the Public Health Act states that women aged 30–60 yearsshould be invited for screening for cervical cancer every five years.
In France, cervical cancer screening is offered to women aged 25–69 yearsevery three years. A recent study estimated that 35% of women in the targetage group have never, or only rarely, been screened. Targeted messageswill be used to reach these women and coverage could be increased by theparticipation of GPs (96% of Pap tests are currently carried out bygynaecologists). The 48th objective of the Public Health Act of 2004 is “tocontinue the annual 2.5% decrease of cervical cancer incidence, notably byincreasing screening coverage rate to 80% for women aged 25–69 andHPV [human papillomavirus] test utilisation.“
National screening programmes for cervical cancer are available also inGermany (for the statutory health insured) and the Netherlands.
In Italy, screening programmes for cervical cancer are similar to those forbreast cancer. Registers are managed at regional level and screeningpolicies are more widespread in northern and central Italy.
In Ireland, Phase 1 of a National Cervical Screening Programme, whichoffers free cervical screening to women aged 25–60 years in the Mid-Western Health Board (MWHB) area, has recently started.
In Spain, cervical cancer screening through cytology is offered to all womenaged 35 years and over, but there are regional differences. In Catalonia,for example, there is a personalized register of all target individuals(women aged 20–64 years). Cervical cancer screening (Pap smear) isrecommended every three to five years. In the Balearic Islands, screeningfor cervical cancer prevention is opportunistic rather than population-based.
In Sweden, organized cervical cancer screening has been implemented sincethe mid-1960s. Guidelines for recommended screening are every third yearfor women aged 23–50 years and every fifth year for women aged 51–60.
24
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
In Bulgaria, a national strategy for prophylactic cancer screening(2001–2006) was approved in 2000. Given the scarce resources availablefor this strategy, however, it only recommends preventive examinations forcervical cancer as part of regular gynaecological examinations.
In Cyprus, there is a national policy on screening for cervical cancer basedon the population register and covering all women aged 25–65 years.
In Hungary, a gynaecological cervical screening programme was launchedin 2004. It is based on Pap smear testing of all women aged 25–65 yearsevery three years.
In Latvia, women aged 20–35 years are recommended to have anoncological test every three years. For women aged 35–70 years, the test iscarried out annually.
Since July 2004, in Lithuania a cervical cancer prevention programme hasbeen financed by the Compulsory Health Insurance Fund. The programmetargets women aged 30–60 years and screening is performed every threeyears.
In Slovenia, there is a national policy on screening for cervical cancer thatincludes all women between the ages of 25 and 64 years. There is activefollow-up through a central surveillance system, and the screening interval isthree years, after two initial smears over six months have proved negative.
Colorectal cancer
The situation in relation to screening for colorectal cancer in the UnitedKingdom has been described in the previous section and is summarized inTable 9.
In Denmark, a trial for colorectal cancer has started in two of the countycouncils where men and women aged 50–74 years are invited to participate.
In Finland, a pilot project for colorectal cancer screening of people betweenthe ages of 60 and 69 years was introduced in 2004 in severalmunicipalities.
In France, colorectal cancer screening is the 53rd objective of the 2004Public Health Act and is currently the subject of trials in 22 départements.
25
People aged 50–74 years are invited for a faecal occult blood test (FOBT)every two years. If the result is positive, a colonoscopy is carried out. Theprogramme will be assessed shortly to define the national strategy for2007. Initial results showed an increasing rate of participation (up to 50%in some départements) because of active participation by GPs.
HIV screening
In the United Kingdom, HIV screening is offered to all women in the earlystages of pregnancy with clear referral paths for positive cases (Table 5),and is compulsory for blood and organ donors.
Elsewhere in the EU, HIV screening tends to be targeted at vulnerable socialgroups. It is more common among the new Member States and CandidateCountries.
In the Czech Republic, for example, HIV screening is compulsory for donorsof blood, organs or any biological material, and for pregnant women. InEstonia, it is compulsory during pregnancy, on entering the military serviceand for prisoners. In Latvia, the target population includes pregnant women,individuals to be recruited for military service, those involved in the nationalarmed forces and international peace maintenance, and prisoners. InSlovenia, HIV screening is performed on pregnant women, patients with anewly established diagnosis of syphilis, and on all donors of blood ororgans. In Turkey, it is compulsory for blood donors, registered sex workers(once every three months), illegal migrant sex workers, men recruited formilitary service, any patient undergoing a blood test at a public health unit,pregnant women, patients before undergoing surgery and couples intendingto marry.
HIV screening programmes are also offered to all pregnant women inFinland and France, although it is not compulsory. Screening is compulsory,however, for donors of blood, organs, sperm or milk.
Tuberculosis screening
Screening for TB is not at the moment recommended as a nationalprogramme in the United Kingdom although it was originally the earliestscreening programme introduced with successful results.
26
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Screening for TB is performed in several European countries and particularlyin the new Member States and Candidate Countries. In Hungary, forexample, TB screening is based on a defined population register with asystem for targeting and recalling individuals (aged 18 years and over), onan annual basis. In 2003, 134 fixed and 48 mobile pulmonary screeningstations were operating, and 3 717 518 screening examinations werecarried out (43% of the adult population was screened).
A massive TB screening programme is in place also in Romania. Thousandsof people are screened by X-ray examination: soldiers, recruits, teachers inschools (every year), children entering kindergarten and their parents,couples before marriage and prisoners. All individuals who work in thefood industry or those who are handling food also require an annual X-rayexamination.
In Turkey, there is a national policy for screening, monitoring and treatingTB. This is based on a defined population, which includes primary schoolchildren (between 7 and 11 years of age), registered sex workers (once ayear), and men conducting their compulsory military service (20–41 years).TB screening is also a procedural requirement for all job applicationsassociated with joining any of the existing insurance schemes.
The key points on screening in the European Union are summarized in Box 2.
CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of this brief account, it is evident that screening programmesand practices vary widely across the countries of the EU and will continueto do so for many years to come. This is inevitable given the differingstructures and financing of health services, and differing demographicfeatures of the population. There are, however, key objectives to strive for.These include having one national body per country responsible for practiceand policy, scrupulous adherence to the long-established screening criteria,accurate population registers, greater uniformity of access across differentareas of a given country and across different socioeconomic groups, andsound research evidence on which to base practice.
The wide variation in practice in Europe illustrates the complexity ofscreening. Some lessons, however, stand out:
27
• the need for greater consideration to be paid to the effectiveness ofscreening;
• the need for more attention to be given to evaluating the processes ofscreening;
• above all, an imperative to involve participating individuals in decisionson screening and to give them clear and understandable informationabout what it involves.
Arguably, the most significant development in the screening field in theUnited Kingdom in the last 15 years has been the establishment in 1996 ofthe National Screening Committee (NSC), and this could be used as a modelfor organizing screening in other countries. The NSC now has overallresponsibility for screening policy and for identifying screening proceduresthat should be provided by the National Health Service. It has accepted thelong-established criteria for the assessment of appropriate tests and has beeneffective in both commissioning good quality research where required andin maintaining continuing surveillance and review of existing programmes.
Accurate population registers are essential to facilitate adequate call/recallsystems, which are crucial for the effectiveness of any screening procedure.
28
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
• Antenatal screening programmes for Down syndrome and spina bifida areperformed only in a few countries and are mainly optional. They are oftenonly recommended to women at high risk.
• Neonatal screening for phenylketonuria is systematically recommended inall countries belonging to the EU before May 2004, except Finland.
• Breast cancer screening and cervical cancer screening programmes arerecommended in some European countries.
• HIV screening is more common among the new Member States and threeCandidate Countries and covers specific vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women and blood donors.
• TB screening is performed in a few European countries, especially centraland eastern European countries, such as Hungary, Romania and Turkey.
• Not all the countries follow the basic criteria for screening. A populationregister to allow recall and follow-up of patients is often missing. A singlenational body for reviewing tests and practice is rare.
Box 2: Screening in the EU: key points
Screening must also be adapted to the particular needs of differing localpopulations. There must be rigorous checking of the quality of screeningservices and their evaluation, including medical audit. There should also bea coordinated and measured approach to screening with a gradual roll-outof programmes to ensure effective implementation and to avoid overloadingthe health services.
There remains a need for good research on which to base recommendationsfor screening, but funding is difficult to find. Screening research in theUnited Kingdom is subsumed under the title of Health Services Research butit is expensive to carry out; large numbers of subjects are needed, and ittakes a long time to produce results. Precedence in funding tends to begiven to studies of greater political significance, such as waiting-list targets,where results can be expected more quickly.
Although there is increasing concern with the strength of evidence before aparticular screening test is introduced and greater emphasis on possibleadverse effects, the dilemma as to whether a specific test should beprovided, even if it has not met the criteria, has not been satisfactorilysolved. This can be illustrated by the demand for PSA testing in the UnitedKingdom where the Prostate Cancer Risk Management Programme hasbeen introduced in primary care to provide advice and testing for thosewho request it, rather than providing a national screening programme forwhich there is currently insufficient evidence of benefit.
Challenges
Screening today faces a number of challenges in the EU as elsewhere.
The first of these is the growth of private screening and full-body checks,and the increased demand from the public in the mistaken hope thatscreening will ensure future good health. This trend is currently moreapparent in the United States and the United Kingdom than in Europe as awhole but is likely to spread. A recent survey of screening in the consumermagazine Which? asked two screening experts to give a verdict on theinformation and tests provided by five private full-body screening services.13
They concluded that information provided about the likely benefits, harmsand limitations of the tests was in most cases inadequate, or evenmisleading, and expressed major misgivings about the value of paying forfull-body scans. It was of interest, however, that the two lay peopleinterviewed for the survey were enthusiastic about screening, highlightingthe gap between professional and public perceptions.
29
Screening provided by national health services may not be perfect but it hasbeen introduced on the basis of sound scientific evidence, is subject toongoing scrutiny and provides continuity of care and follow-up. This is notnecessarily the case in the private sector.
Second, we must continue to work on providing honest and comprehensibleinformation about the various programmes and tests, and train or re-trainthose providing it in how to communicate clearly and without bias. It isessential that those invited to participate in screening are able to make aninformed choice and are fully aware of all the implications. This will not beeasy, particularly, for example, with long-established programmes such ascervical cancer screening where in some places it is still perceived thatwomen should agree to screening when invited.
It must also be acknowledged that some of the tests involved are extremelyunpleasant. Faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer is relativelysimple and non-invasive; colonoscopy, the next step after a positive result,most certainly is not.
Third, there is still great variability in the take-up of screening betweendifferent geographical areas and different socioeconomic groups. It isworrying that the more affluent members of the population who aregenerally at lower risk are more likely to accept invitations for screening,while those in the more deprived sectors at higher risk do not. Strategies forimproving equity of access must be devised and implemented.
Finally, there is a major task to educate and inform the media and thepublic as to what screening can and cannot do. Screening is not and cannever be a universal remedy but, used selectively and on the basis of soundresearch evidence, it can continue to be a good use of resources. Providedit remains open to constant review and critical evaluation and is capable ofchange in the light of new evidence, screening will remain a powerful toolin the fight against disease and its impact for the foreseeable future.
30
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
REFERENCES
1 Thorner RM, Remein QR (1961). Principles and Procedures in theEvaluation of Screening for Disease. PHS publication no. 846. PublicHealth Monograph no. 67.Washington: Public Health Service.
2 Wilson JMG, Jungner G (1968). Principles and Practice of Screeningfor Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization.
3 McKeown T (ed.) (1968). Screening in Medical Care: Reviewing theEvidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the Nuffield ProvincialHospitals Trust.
4 www.nsc.nhs.uk/
5 US Commission on Chronic Illness (1957). Chronic Illness in the US.Vol. I. Prevention of Chronic Illness. Cambridge, Mass: HarvardUniversity Press.
6 Health Departments of the United Kingdom (1998). First Report of theUK National Screening Committee, April.
7 Health Departments of the United Kingdom (2000). Second Report ofthe National Screening Committee, October.
8 Cochrane AL, Holland WW (1971). Validation of screeningprocedures. British Medical Bulletin, 27(1):3–8.
9 Chamberlain Jocelyn M (1984). Which prescriptive screeningprogrammes are worthwhile? Journal of Epidemiology and CommunityHealth, 38:270–277.
10 Wykes WN (2004). Personal communication.
11 Hakama M (1986). Screening for cancer. Scandinavian Journal ofSocial Medicine Supplement, 37:17–25.
12 Skrabanek P (1994). The Death of Humane Medicine. London: SocialAffairs Unit.
13 Health Screening (2004). Which?, 12 August.
31
ANNEXE 1
Screening tables: the EU before May 2004
34
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Tuber
culo
sis
Ow
ing
to th
e re
lativ
ely
low
inci
denc
e of
TB
inA
ustri
a, n
o ge
nera
lpl
an o
n sc
reen
ing
is in
plac
e. U
ntil
2000
, the
gene
ral v
acci
natio
npl
an r
ecom
men
ded
inoc
ulat
ion
agai
nst T
B.N
ow o
nly
spec
ific
risk
grou
ps (e
.g.
hosp
ital e
mpl
oyee
s)ar
e va
ccin
ated
.
HIV
Ther
e is
no
natio
nal p
olic
y on
scr
eeni
ng fo
r H
IV. S
ome
1.2
mill
ion
peop
le in
Aus
tria
have
an
HIV
test
done
ever
y ye
ar, 5
0000
0 of
them
whe
n m
akin
g a
bloo
d do
natio
n.Fo
r pre
vent
ion
of H
IV in
fect
ion,
gen
eral
info
rmat
ion
broc
hure
s en
sure
con
tinui
ty in
the
diss
emin
atio
n of
bas
icin
form
atio
n ab
out t
his
dise
ase.
Tar
get-g
roup
-spec
ific
publ
icat
ions
and
cam
paig
ns a
re a
ddre
ssed
to c
erta
in
age
grou
ps (e
.g. y
oung
peo
ple)
or
peop
le w
ho in
dulg
e in
cer
tain
form
s of
hig
h-ris
k be
havi
our
(peo
ple
who
frequ
ently
cha
nge
sexu
al p
artn
ers,
sex
tour
ists,
pro
stitu
tes
and
thei
r cu
stom
ers)
. The
dut
y of
the
Fede
ral
Min
iste
r of
Hea
lth to
impl
emen
t mea
sure
s to
edu
cate
peo
ple
abou
t HIV
and
the
prev
entio
n of
HIV
infe
ctio
n is
embe
dded
in th
e A
ustri
an A
IDS
Act
, 198
5.
In a
dditi
on to
its
cent
ral i
nfor
mat
ion
activ
ities
, the
hea
lth d
epar
tmen
t sup
ports
the
regi
onal
AID
S he
lp
insti
tutio
ns a
nd a
num
ber
of s
elf-h
elp
insti
tutio
ns. T
he c
ontin
uous
info
rmat
ion
and
cons
ulta
tion
activ
ities
of t
heA
IDS
help
insti
tutio
ns r
ange
from
car
ryin
g ou
t ano
nym
ous
HIV
ant
ibod
y te
sts a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d ad
viso
ry ta
lks,
right
up
to th
e ps
ycho
logi
cal c
are
of H
IV-p
ositi
ve p
eopl
e an
d th
ose
with
full-
blow
n A
IDS.
The
Fede
ral M
inis
try fo
r H
ealth
and
Wom
en p
ublis
hes
statis
tics
on in
cide
nce
and
deat
hs, d
iffer
entia
ted
byris
k gr
oups
and
pro
vinc
es, o
n a
mon
thly
bas
is.
Chla
mydia
No
info
rmat
ion
avai
labl
e.
Aust
ria
Tuber
culo
sis
In th
e Fr
ench
Com
mun
ity a
ll ne
w c
ases
of T
B m
ust
be d
ecla
red
to th
e pr
ovin
cial
hea
lth in
spec
tor.
The
Foun
datio
n fo
r Re
spira
tory
Con
ditio
ns a
ndH
ealth
Edu
catio
n (F
onda
tion
cont
re le
sA
ffect
ions
Res
pira
toire
s et
pou
r l’E
duca
tion
à la
Sant
é: F
ARE
S) p
roce
sses
the
regi
ster
of a
ctiv
eca
ses
of T
B fo
r th
e W
allo
on d
istri
ct a
nd th
e m
etro
polit
an d
istri
ct o
f Bru
ssel
s. In
the
Flem
ish
Com
mun
ity th
e re
cord
ing
is in
the
hand
s of
the
heal
th in
spec
tion
of th
e Pr
even
tive
and
Soci
alH
ealth
Car
e D
ivis
ion.
All
data
are
bro
ught
toge
ther
in th
e Be
lgia
n tu
berc
ulos
is r
egis
ter.
This
pol
icy
is fi
nanc
ed b
y th
e C
omm
uniti
es.
HIV
In B
elgi
um th
ere
are
seve
n A
IDS-
refe
renc
e ce
ntre
s w
ith e
ight
refe
renc
e la
bora
torie
s, r
ecog
nize
d an
d fin
ance
d by
the
fede
ral g
over
nmen
t. O
ne o
f the
ir ta
sks
is to
impl
emen
t co
nfirm
atio
n te
sts o
n se
ra fo
und
posi
tive
at a
det
ectio
n te
st.Si
nce
only
thes
e se
ven
refe
renc
e ce
ntre
s ar
e qu
alifi
ed to
run
thes
e te
sts, t
he re
cord
ing
give
s a
com
plet
e pi
ctur
e of
the
tota
lnu
mbe
r of
per
sons
with
HIV
. The
ref
eren
ce c
entre
s al
so tr
yto
col
lect
bas
ic e
pide
mio
logi
cal f
acts.
For
this
a sta
ndar
dize
dfo
rm is
sen
t to
ever
y do
ctor
who
dia
gnos
es H
IV, r
eque
sting
info
rmat
ion
on s
ex, a
ge, n
atio
nalit
y, p
ossi
ble
man
ner
ofco
ntag
ion
and
clin
ical
sta
ge a
t the
poi
nt o
f dia
gnos
is.
This
reg
istra
tion
is fi
nanc
ed b
y th
e fe
dera
l sta
te a
nd d
ata
are
anal
ysed
by
the
Scie
ntifi
c In
stitu
te o
f Pub
lic H
ealth
.
Chla
mydia
Chl
amyd
iais
one
of t
he o
rgan
ism
sth
at h
ave
to b
e re
porte
d by
the
115
sent
inel
mic
robi
olog
y la
bora
torie
s re
pres
entin
g 59
% o
f all
reco
gniz
edpr
ivat
e or
hos
pita
l mic
robi
olog
y la
bora
torie
s in
200
4. It
mus
t be
repo
rted
to th
e Sc
ient
ific
Insti
tute
of
Publ
ic H
ealth
, whi
ch fo
llow
s th
e tre
nds
in n
umbe
rs o
f iso
late
s of
diff
eren
tor
gani
sms
repo
rted
to th
e ne
twor
k in
ord
er to
car
ry o
ut s
urve
illan
ce o
fin
fect
ious
dis
ease
s. T
his
regi
strat
ion
is fi
nanc
ed b
y th
e fe
dera
l sta
te.
Bel
giu
m
Tabl
e A
1.1
TB,
HIV
, Chl
amyd
ia
35
Tuber
culo
sis
Wor
ld H
ealth
Org
aniz
atio
n (W
HO
) and
the
Inte
rnat
iona
lU
nion
Aga
inst
Tube
rcul
osis
and
Lun
g D
iseas
e (IU
ATLD
), ad
vise
ever
y co
untry
to h
ave
a na
tiona
lpro
gram
me
on tu
berc
ulos
is,
whe
reby
eve
ry c
ase
is r
epor
ted
to th
e au
thor
ities
. In
Den
mar
kca
ses
are
repo
rted
to th
e m
edic
al o
ffice
r of
hea
lth. T
reat
men
tsar
e of
fere
d at
pul
mon
ary
units
, whi
ch e
nsur
e th
at tr
eatm
ent i
sca
rrie
d ou
t, m
edic
atio
n is
take
n as
pre
scrib
ed, a
nd th
at th
epa
tient
is c
ured
. The
sam
e un
its a
lso m
ake
sure
that
the
envi
ronm
ent a
roun
d ev
ery
infe
ctio
us c
ase
is e
xam
ined
clos
ely.
Eve
ry m
embe
r of
the
patie
nt’s
fam
ily is
X-ra
yed
and
Man
toux
teste
d.
In 1
986
the
prev
alen
ce o
f TB
was
the
low
est e
ver
at 2
99ca
ses.
Sin
ce th
en it
has
nea
rly d
oubl
ed, p
rimar
ily d
ue to
imm
igra
tion
from
are
as w
ith a
hig
h pr
eval
ence
. The
re a
reon
ly a
few
rec
orde
d ca
ses
of T
B tra
nsm
itted
from
imm
igra
nts
to n
ativ
e D
anes
.
HIV
Scre
enin
g fo
r H
IV is
oppo
rtuni
stic.
Tes
ts ar
eav
aila
ble,
and
free
of
char
ge, a
t eve
ry G
P su
rger
y an
d at
larg
erho
spita
ls th
roug
hout
the
coun
try, w
here
an
onym
ous
testi
ng a
ndco
unse
lling
are
avai
labl
e.In
form
atio
n ab
out t
hete
sting
opt
ions
is
prom
oted
in h
igh-
risk
popu
latio
ns, e
spec
ially
amon
g th
e ho
mos
exua
lpo
pula
tion.
Chla
mydia
As
with
all
othe
r se
xual
ly tr
ansm
itted
dis
ease
s (S
TDs)
, tes
ting
for
Chl
amyd
iais
offe
red
at e
very
GP
surg
ery
and
at la
rger
hos
pita
ls.W
heth
er th
e pr
esen
t scr
eeni
ng o
ptio
n sh
ould
be
chan
ged
to a
strat
egy
whe
re a
ll yo
ung
peop
le in
the
age
grou
p 16
–25
year
sar
e of
fere
d a
year
ly h
ome
test
is u
nder
con
side
ratio
n. A
hom
ete
st w
ill a
lso b
e of
fere
d to
par
tner
s w
hen
know
n. T
his
strat
egy
isin
tend
ed to
red
uce
the
frequ
ency
of C
hlam
ydia
and
the
num
ber
of u
roge
nita
l inf
ectio
ns, i
nfer
tility
, ect
opic
pre
gnan
cy a
nd c
hron
icab
dom
inal
pai
n. T
he s
trate
gy w
ill b
e co
st-ef
fect
ive
afte
r the
four
thye
ar o
f scr
eeni
ng. B
ecau
se o
f con
cern
s ab
out s
tigm
atiz
atio
n,ho
me
tests
are
gen
eral
ly w
ell a
ccep
ted
by th
e ta
rget
gro
up, w
hosh
ould
hav
e im
med
iate
acce
ss to
info
rmat
ion
and
advi
ce.
All
thre
e di
seas
es a
re b
eing
kep
t und
er s
urve
illan
ce b
y th
e St
ate
Seru
m In
stitu
te. T
he s
cree
ning
tests
and
, if n
eede
d, th
e tre
atm
ent,
are
free
of c
harg
e w
ith c
osts
cove
red
by th
e co
unty
cou
ncils
.
Den
mark
Tuber
culo
sis
The
natio
nal p
olic
y on
scr
eeni
ng fo
r TB
isop
portu
nisti
c i.e
. it i
s ba
sed
on id
entif
ied
case
s. A
phy
sici
an is
res
pons
ible
for
notif
ying
ever
y TB
cas
e to
the
natio
nal r
egis
ter
of
infe
ctio
us d
isea
se a
dmin
iste
red
by th
eN
atio
nal P
ublic
Hea
lth In
stitu
te. T
here
are
abou
t 500
new
TB
case
s in
Fin
land
ann
ually
.
HIV
Scre
enin
g fo
r H
IV fo
r pr
egna
nt w
omen
was
sta
rted
in 1
993.
Exc
ept f
or p
regn
ant w
omen
, the
scr
eeni
ngsy
stem
for
HIV
is o
ppor
tuni
stic.
The
Nat
iona
l Pub
licH
ealth
Insti
tute
mai
ntai
ns a
n H
IV la
bora
tory
, whi
chfo
llow
s, p
redi
cts
and
tries
to p
reve
nt n
ew H
IV c
ases
.In
the
perio
d 19
80–2
003,
162
5 H
IV c
ases
wer
eid
entif
ied
in F
inla
nd. T
he F
inni
sh m
unic
ipal
ities
,w
hich
org
aniz
e an
d fin
ance
mat
erni
ty c
linic
ser
vice
s,or
gani
ze th
e sc
reen
ing
prog
ram
me
for
HIV
for
preg
nant
wom
en.
Chla
mydia
The
natio
nal s
cree
ning
pol
icy
for
Chl
amyd
iais
oppo
rtuni
stic.
Onl
y Fi
nnis
h St
uden
t Hea
lthSe
rvic
es (Y
THS)
org
aniz
e sy
stem
atic
scr
eeni
ngfo
r C
hlam
ydia
for
first-
year
uni
vers
ity s
tude
nts
and
for
stude
nts
mak
ing
gyna
ecol
ogic
al v
isits
.Fo
r fir
st-ye
ar u
nive
rsity
stu
dent
s sc
reen
ing
isun
derta
ken
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith a
phy
sica
l ex
amin
atio
n. F
inni
sh S
tude
nt H
ealth
Ser
vice
s ar
e fin
ance
d m
ainl
y by
the
Nat
iona
l Soc
ial
Insu
ranc
e In
stitu
te (K
ELA
in F
inni
sh) a
nd s
tude
nts.
Finla
nd
36
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Tuber
culo
sis
No
info
rmat
ion
avai
labl
e.
HIV
HIV
scr
eeni
ng is
sys
tem
atic
and
com
pulso
ry fo
rbl
ood,
org
an, s
perm
or m
ilk d
onor
s. It
issy
stem
atic
ally
sug
geste
d in
pre
nupt
ial a
ndpr
enat
al e
xam
inat
ions
and
ofte
n to
peo
ple
unde
rgoi
ng s
urgi
cal p
roce
dure
s.If
som
eone
wish
es to
ben
efit
from
HIV
sc
reen
ing,
ther
e ar
e tw
o po
ssib
ilitie
s:1.
Atte
ndan
ce a
t spe
cial
cen
tres
(Con
sulta
tions
de D
épist
age
Ano
nym
e et
Gra
tuit:
CD
AG
),w
here
tests
are
free
and
ano
nym
ous.
The
reis
at le
ast o
ne c
entre
per
”de
partm
ent”
.2.
Con
sulta
tion
with
a G
P or
spe
cial
ist, w
how
ill p
resc
ribe
an H
IV te
st. T
he te
st is
perfo
rmed
in a
labo
rato
ry a
nd fu
lly
reim
burs
ed.
Chla
mydia
In 2
003,
the
Min
istry
of H
ealth
ask
ed th
e N
atio
nal A
genc
y fo
r Eva
luat
ion
in H
ealth
Car
e(A
NA
ES) t
o ev
alua
te th
e op
portu
nity
to s
et u
p a
natio
nal p
olic
y fo
r Chl
amyd
iasc
reen
ing.
AN
AES
reco
mm
ende
d th
e ad
optio
n of
an
oppo
rtuni
stic
strat
egy
for s
cree
ning
, tar
getin
g th
epo
pula
tion
at ri
sk in
cen
tres
for b
irth
plan
ning
and
edu
catio
n (C
entre
s de
pla
nific
atio
n et
d’
éduc
atio
n fa
mili
ale)
, in
cent
res
for f
ree
and
anon
ymou
s sc
reen
ing
(CD
AG
), in
ant
i-ven
erea
ldi
seas
es d
ispen
sarie
s (D
ispen
saire
s an
ti-vé
nérie
ns:D
AV),
in c
entre
s fo
r abo
rtion
, and
in
cent
res
for m
othe
r and
chi
ld c
are.
Chl
amyd
iasc
reen
ing
shou
ld b
e of
fere
d to
mal
es a
ndfe
mal
es u
nder
the
age
of 3
0 w
ho a
re s
exua
lly a
ctiv
e, w
ho h
ave
chan
ged
sexu
al p
artn
er in
the
last
12 m
onth
s, o
r who
se p
artn
er m
ay b
e in
fect
ed w
ith a
sex
ually
tran
smitt
ed d
iseas
e.Pa
rticu
lar a
ttent
ion
shou
ld b
e gi
ven
to p
eopl
e w
ho d
o no
t hav
e re
gula
r con
tact
with
the
heal
th c
are
syste
m.
AN
AES
also
reco
mm
ende
d pi
lot s
tudi
es in
gen
eral
pra
ctic
e to
eva
luat
e th
e pr
eval
ence
of
the
Chl
amyd
iain
fect
ion,
and
to a
ctiv
ely
prom
ote
the
use
of c
ondo
ms
in th
e ge
nera
l pop
ulat
ion.
The
redu
ctio
n of
Chl
amyd
iapr
eval
ence
(and
oth
er S
TDs)
is on
e of
the
100
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
Publ
ic H
ealth
Act
of A
ugus
t 200
4, b
ut th
e m
eans
of a
chie
ving
this
goal
are
not
des
crib
ed.
France
Tuber
culo
sis
The
Infe
ctio
us D
iseas
esA
ct o
f 200
0 ha
s m
odifi
ed th
e ta
rget
grou
ps fo
r TB
scre
enin
g.Te
ache
rs a
nd m
any
othe
r pro
fess
iona
lgr
oups
dea
ling
with
the
publ
ic a
re n
o lo
nger
rout
inel
y sc
reen
ed,
whi
le e
lder
ly p
eopl
em
ovin
g to
an
insti
tutio
n,an
d as
ylum
see
kers
,ar
e no
w s
cree
ned.
HIV
and C
hla
mydia
Ther
e is
no n
atio
nal p
olic
y on
scr
eeni
ng fo
r HIV
or C
hlam
ydia
. Cas
e-fin
ding
for H
IV o
r Chl
amyd
iain
fect
ions
is p
aid
for b
y sta
tuto
ryhe
alth
insu
ranc
e in
the
pres
ence
of i
ndic
ativ
e co
mpl
aint
s or
sym
ptom
s. S
cree
ning
is e
ncou
rage
d in
pre
gnan
cy a
nd re
com
men
ded
in“r
isk g
roup
s” b
y pr
ofes
siona
l gui
delin
es b
ut is
sub
ject
to th
e de
cisio
n of
the
phys
icia
n an
d pa
tient
(“op
portu
nisti
c”).
With
rega
rd to
HIV
ther
e is
a na
tiona
l pol
icy
not t
o en
cour
age
testi
ng, b
ut to
focu
s on
pra
ctic
al p
rote
ctio
n m
essa
ges
(con
dom
s, ri
sk-
pron
e sit
uatio
ns, n
egot
iatio
n sk
ills,
as
wel
l as
solid
arity
with
thos
e af
fect
ed).
Man
y ot
her c
ount
ries
use
both
vol
unta
ry c
ouns
ellin
g an
dte
sting
stra
tegi
es. T
he G
erm
an a
nd D
utch
pub
lic e
duca
tion
syste
ms,
for e
xam
ple,
enc
oura
ge v
olun
tary
cou
nsel
ling
and
are
silen
t abo
utte
sting
to tr
y to
avo
id a
redu
ctio
n in
saf
e be
havi
our.
For t
he s
ame
reas
on, t
estin
g w
as e
ven
proa
ctiv
ely
disc
oura
ged
amon
g ho
mos
exua
lsin
the
early
and
mid
-199
0s. I
n ge
nera
l, w
ritte
n ed
ucat
ion
mat
eria
ls ar
e pr
ovid
ed a
nd b
alan
ce te
sting
is re
com
men
ded
if lo
ng-te
rm
partn
ers
wan
t a c
hild
or w
ant t
o ch
oose
ano
ther
con
trace
ptiv
e. T
here
is e
xten
sive
info
rmat
ion
abou
t tes
t val
idity
, tes
t cha
ract
erist
ics,
the
win
dow
per
iod
and
reco
mm
enda
tions
for s
uppo
rt an
d fu
ture
beh
avio
ur.
HIV
and
Chl
amyd
iaw
ere
neve
r def
ined
as
“sex
ually
-tran
smitt
able
infe
ctio
ns”
(STI
s) in
a le
gal s
ense
sin
ce th
is w
ould
hav
e m
eant
unt
il19
99 th
at le
gal o
ptio
ns to
per
form
com
pulso
ry te
sting
and
trea
tmen
t cou
ld h
ave
been
app
lied
to “
non-
com
plia
nt”
STI p
atie
nts
unde
rtre
atm
ent o
r to
“pro
misc
uous
peo
ple
susp
ecte
d of
spr
eadi
ng th
e di
seas
e”. T
he In
fect
ious
Dise
ases
Act
of 2
000
abol
ished
the
1956
com
pulso
ry re
gula
tions
for a
ll ST
Is, w
hich
, in
prac
tice,
had
rare
ly b
een
appl
ied.
Ger
many
Tabl
e A
1.1
con
t.
37
Tuber
culo
sis
Acc
ordi
ng to
Pre
siden
tial D
ecre
e /
GN
G 2
62A
/195
0,th
e re
porti
ng o
f TB
in G
reec
e is
com
pulso
ry. C
ases
shou
ld b
e re
porte
d w
ithin
one
wee
k of
dia
gnos
is b
y th
e cl
inic
ians
in c
harg
e. N
atio
nal h
ospi
tals
prov
ide
the
tube
rcul
osis
bul
letin
and
ask
the
patie
nt to
fill
in a
ll th
ere
leva
nt in
form
atio
n co
ncer
ning
the
statu
s an
d se
verit
y of
his
or
her
dise
ase.
Th
e In
tern
atio
nal U
nion
Aga
inst
Tube
rcul
osis
and
Resp
irato
ry D
isea
ses
(IUA
LATD
) and
WH
O h
ave
laun
ched
gui
delin
es to
pro
mot
e an
ti-tu
berc
ulos
isca
mpa
igns
in fa
vour
of v
acci
ne p
rogr
amm
es. E
mph
asis
is p
lace
d on
the
vacc
inat
ion
of th
e fo
llow
ing
high
-risk
grou
ps:
•im
mig
rant
s;
•ne
onat
es w
hose
mot
hers
hav
e be
en in
fect
ed w
ithH
IV;
•ch
ildre
n w
ith M
anto
ux (–
) (ne
gativ
e), a
nd a
fam
ilym
embe
r w
ith r
ecog
nize
d tu
berc
ulos
is;
•Ro
m p
eopl
e.In
acc
orda
nce
with
the
WH
O g
uide
lines
(WH
O/W
ER 2
004,
79:
25–4
0), M
embe
rs a
re in
vite
dto
dev
elop
a m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n sy
stem
for
reco
rdin
g TB
cas
es a
nd c
olle
ctin
g re
liabl
eep
idem
iolo
gica
l dat
a.
A s
igni
fican
t red
uctio
n in
rec
orde
d ca
ses
of T
B is
obse
rved
in G
reec
e, in
com
paris
on w
ith th
e re
st of
the
EU M
embe
r St
ates
. In
2002
Gre
ece
mai
ntai
ned
one
ofth
e lo
wer
rat
es a
mon
g EU
cou
ntrie
s w
ith 6
.6 c
ases
per
100
000
peop
le, w
hile
the
EU a
vera
ge w
as 1
1.55
.
HIV
In G
reec
e se
vera
l pol
icie
s ha
ve b
een
impl
emen
ted
to c
ontro
l, m
onito
ran
d pr
even
t the
HIV
epi
dem
ic. T
he H
elle
nic
Cen
tre fo
r In
fect
ious
Dis
ease
Con
trol (
KEEL
) is
resp
onsi
ble
for
HIV
/AID
S ca
se r
epor
ting
and
has
esta
blis
hed
a re
liabl
e m
onito
ring
netw
ork
of n
ine
AID
SLa
bora
torie
s Re
fere
nce
Cen
tres
and
17 H
IV/A
IDS
clin
ics
in p
ublic
and
priv
ate
hosp
itals.
A
IDS
case
rep
ortin
g w
as im
plem
ente
d in
Gre
ece
in 1
984.
It is
anon
ymou
s, c
onfid
entia
l and
man
dato
ry b
y la
w A
1/61
22/1
9-9-
1986
. The
firs
t tw
o ch
arac
ters
of t
he n
ame
as w
ell a
s th
e pa
tient
’sda
te o
f birt
h ar
e us
ed a
s pe
rson
al id
entif
iers
to p
reve
nt d
uplic
atio
n.Th
e re
porti
ng o
f HIV
cas
es w
as in
itial
ly im
plem
ente
d in
Gre
ece
in19
98. I
t is
anon
ymou
s, c
onfid
entia
l and
man
dato
ry b
y la
wB1
/529
5/7-
8-19
98. T
he n
ew s
urve
illan
ce s
yste
m fo
r m
onito
ring
HIV
infe
ctio
n w
as im
plem
ente
d at
Eur
opea
n le
vel i
n Ja
nuar
y 19
99.
KEEL
is r
espo
nsib
le fo
r co
llect
ing
and
mon
itorin
g da
ta o
n H
IV a
ndot
her
infe
ctio
us d
isea
ses.
Rep
ortin
g is
obl
igat
ory
and
all h
ospi
tals
and
heal
th c
entre
s ar
e ob
liged
to r
epor
t tre
ated
cas
es. K
EEL
pres
ents
the
colle
cted
info
rmat
ion
ever
y si
x m
onth
s. A
pre
-spec
ified
sta
ndar
dfo
rmat
is u
sed
in o
rder
to e
nsur
e ho
mog
enei
ty o
f the
rep
orte
d da
ta.
Acc
ordi
ng to
the
“Hal
f-Yea
r” e
ditio
n of
KEE
L (3
0 Ju
ne 2
004)
, the
num
ber
of H
IV p
ositi
ve p
erso
ns (i
nclu
ding
AID
S ca
ses)
rep
orte
d in
Gre
ece
over
the
first
half
of 2
004,
was
esti
mat
ed to
be
6923
cas
es,
and
arou
nd 2
21 w
ere
new
HIV
infe
ctio
ns. T
he p
erce
ntag
e of
men
repo
rting
HIV
infe
ctio
n w
as o
n av
erag
e 4
times
hig
her
than
that
of
wom
en.
Dat
a on
new
ly d
iagn
osed
HIV
infe
ctio
ns s
houl
d be
inte
rpre
ted
with
cau
tion
beca
use
they
may
not
rep
rese
nt in
cide
nce
and
beca
use
they
dep
end
heav
ily o
n va
ryin
g pa
ttern
s of
HIV
testi
ng a
nd re
porti
ng.
Chla
mydia
Ther
e ar
e no
dat
aav
aila
ble
on C
hlam
ydia
in G
reec
e. O
n th
e ba
sis
of s
ever
al in
terv
iew
sco
nduc
ted
by o
ur te
am a
tth
e U
nive
rsity
of A
then
sw
ith o
ffici
als
at th
eM
inis
try o
f Hea
lth a
ndKE
EL, i
t was
rep
orte
d th
atKE
EL is
in th
e pr
oces
s of
deve
lopi
ng a
reg
istry
of
sexu
ally
and
com
mun
icab
le d
isea
ses
incl
udin
g C
hlam
ydia
,kn
own
as S
exua
llyC
omm
unic
able
Dis
ease
sSu
rvei
llanc
e.
The
aim
is to
dev
elop
am
onito
ring
syste
m fo
rC
hlam
ydia
, fin
ance
dex
clus
ivel
y by
KEE
L.
A p
ilot p
roje
ct is
des
igne
dan
d w
ill b
e im
plem
ente
din
the
near
futu
re a
t the
And
reas
Syg
ros
Hos
pita
lin
Ath
ens
as w
ell a
s at
the
Aph
rodi
siac
Hos
pita
lin
The
ssal
onic
a.
Gre
ece
38
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Tuber
culo
sis
Ther
e is
a T
B va
ccin
atio
n pr
ogra
mm
e, th
eBC
G in
ject
ion,
whi
ch is
adm
inis
tere
d to
all
child
ren
in Ir
elan
d in
the
first
few
mon
ths
oflif
e. It
is n
ot o
ppor
tuni
stic.
HIV
The
Dep
artm
ent o
f Hea
lth a
nd C
hild
ren
intro
duce
d a
polic
y of
vo
lunt
ary
ante
nata
l HIV
scr
eeni
ng in
Irel
and
in A
pril
1999
. As
part
ofth
is p
rogr
amm
e, H
IV s
cree
ning
is o
ffere
d to
all
wom
en w
ho a
ttend
for
ante
nata
l ser
vice
s.
Chla
mydia
No
natio
nal s
cree
ning
pol
icy.
Chla
mydia
Rout
ine
scre
enin
g fo
r as
ympt
omat
icin
fect
ion
is r
ecom
men
ded
for
adol
esce
nt w
omen
who
are
sex
ually
activ
e an
d fo
r w
omen
at h
igh
risk
of in
fect
ion.
How
ever
, thi
s is
left
to lo
cal h
ealth
aut
horit
ies
and,
ul
timat
ely,
to th
e de
cisi
on o
f in
divi
dual
doc
tors
.
Irel
and
Tuber
culo
sis
With
the
intro
duct
ion
of th
e de
cree
of 2
9Ju
ly 1
998,
all d
iagn
osed
cas
es o
f TB
and
myc
obac
terio
sis
mus
tbe
not
ified
to th
e he
alth
aut
horit
ies.
Scr
eeni
ng is
carr
ied
out a
t reg
iona
l lev
el. F
or e
xam
ple,
the
ASR
of E
mili
a Ro
mag
na h
as d
evel
oped
sof
twar
e fo
rm
onito
ring
and
surv
eilla
nce
of T
B. D
urin
g 20
03,
314
case
s of
TB
in th
e ad
ult p
opul
atio
n (o
ver
14ye
ars
old)
wer
e re
porte
d in
this
reg
ion,
of w
hich
25%
wai
ted
for
a m
onth
bef
ore
cont
actin
g a
doct
or, a
nd 5
0% h
ad a
del
ay in
dia
gnos
is g
reat
erth
an tw
o m
onth
s.
HIV
Rece
ntly,
the
Min
istry
of H
ealth
has
esta
blis
hed
a N
atio
nal
Com
mis
sion
for
HIV
(“C
omm
issi
one
Naz
iona
le p
er la
lotta
cont
ro l’
AID
S“) w
hich
is in
tend
ed to
dev
ise
educ
atio
nal a
ndpr
even
tive
strat
egie
s an
d to
pro
mot
e co
ntin
uing
edu
catio
nfo
r doc
tors
in th
e fie
ld o
f inf
ectio
us d
iseas
es. T
he c
omm
issio
nw
ill a
lso m
onito
r th
e sp
read
of H
IV b
oth
at n
atio
nal a
ndin
tern
atio
nal l
evel
, with
par
ticul
ar e
mph
asis
on
high
-risk
ca
tego
ries.
It w
ill p
rom
ote
and
mon
itor
rese
arch
in H
IV a
ndau
dit t
he le
vel o
f car
e pr
ovid
ed fo
r H
IV p
atie
nts.
Mor
eove
r,th
e co
mm
issi
on w
ill u
pdat
e gu
idel
ines
for
certa
in ty
pes
oftre
atm
ent a
nd v
erify
DG
Rs ta
riffs
for
infe
ctio
us d
isea
ses.
Italy
Tuber
culo
sis
No
info
rmat
ion
avai
labl
e.H
IV a
nd C
hla
mydia
Ther
e is
no
natio
nal s
cree
ning
pro
gram
me
for
HIV
or
Chl
amyd
ia. H
owev
er:
•al
l pre
gnan
t wom
en c
an u
nder
go a
n H
IV te
st as
par
t of a
nten
atal
and
pos
tnat
al s
cree
ning
;•
the
loca
l pub
lic h
ealth
age
ncie
s (G
GD
s) a
re in
cha
rge
of H
IV te
sting
of s
peci
fic r
isk
grou
ps.
How
ever
, the
GG
Ds
have
set
up
volu
ntar
y H
IV s
cree
ning
for
men
and
wom
en in
hig
h-ris
k gr
oups
(hom
osex
uals,
drug
add
icts,
pro
stitu
tes)
.
Net
her
lands
Tabl
e A
1.1
con
t.
39
Tuber
culo
sis
Scre
enin
g is
opp
ortu
nisti
c. N
eona
tes
are
vacc
inat
ed. A
ll TB
-rela
ted
serv
ices
are
finan
ced
by th
e na
tiona
l hea
lth s
ervi
ce(in
divi
dual
s ar
e ex
empt
from
any
sor
t of
paym
ent).
Chi
ldre
n in
con
tact
with
TB
patie
nts
are
give
n tre
atm
ent.
Som
e ty
pes
of T
B ar
e w
ithin
the
syste
m o
fco
mpu
lsory
not
ifica
tion
of d
isea
se.
HIV
Scre
enin
g is
opp
ortu
nisti
c. N
otifi
catio
n of
HIV
beca
me
com
pulso
ry in
200
4. D
rugs
for
AID
Spa
tient
s ar
e fu
lly r
eim
burs
ed b
y th
e sta
te; p
atie
nts
are
exem
pted
from
use
r ch
arge
s in
the
NH
S; b
utH
IV-p
ositi
ve p
atie
nts
pay
for
drug
s ou
tside
hos
pita
l. Th
ere
are
guid
elin
es fo
r te
sting
pre
gnan
tw
omen
, with
the
aim
of i
mpr
ovin
g de
tect
ion
and
early
trea
tmen
t.
Chla
mydia
Scre
enin
g is
opp
ortu
nisti
c. C
hlam
ydia
is n
ot
spec
ially
targ
eted
in th
e na
tiona
l pro
gram
mes
, but
is tr
eate
d w
ithin
the
grou
p of
sex
ually
tran
smitt
eddi
seas
es. S
cree
ning
is u
sual
ly d
one
thro
ugh
the
Pap
test,
with
gui
delin
es o
n fre
quen
cy o
f tes
ting.
Th
ere
is n
o po
pula
tion
regi
ster
to a
llow
for
targ
etin
g an
d re
calli
ng p
atie
nts,
nor
do
curr
ent
info
rmat
ion
syste
ms
allo
w fo
r th
at.
Port
ugal
Tuber
culo
sis
Regi
onal
gov
ernm
ents
have
res
pons
ibili
ty fo
r TB
con
trol a
ndpr
even
tion
prog
ram
mes
. Gui
delin
es w
ere
prov
ided
in a
co
nsen
sus
docu
men
t on
TB p
reve
ntio
n an
d co
ntro
l. Th
isdo
cum
ent o
utlin
es th
e ne
ed fo
r co
oper
atio
n be
twee
n th
eM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth a
nd th
e D
epar
tmen
ts of
Hea
lthof
the
regi
onal
gov
ernm
ents
in o
rder
to c
reat
e a
prac
tical
and
effic
ient
net
wor
k fo
r con
trol a
nd p
reve
ntio
n of
TB.
In 1
995,
with
the
crea
tion
of th
e na
tiona
l Net
wor
k fo
r Ep
idem
iolo
gica
lSu
rvei
llanc
e, r
espi
rato
ry tu
berc
ulos
is w
as in
clud
ed in
the
natio
nal r
egis
try o
f com
pulso
ry n
otifi
catio
n di
seas
es. I
n 20
02al
l typ
es o
f TB
wer
e in
clud
ed in
the
regi
stry.
In 1
996
only
82%
of t
he A
uton
omou
s C
omm
uniti
es h
ad d
evel
oped
are
gion
al p
rogr
amm
e fo
r TB
pre
vent
ion
and
cont
rol.
Alth
ough
TB n
otifi
catio
n is
obl
igat
ory,
in 1
999
only
78%
of t
he c
ases
dete
cted
in Z
arag
oza
wer
e ac
tual
ly r
egis
tere
d, a
nd th
ispe
rcen
tage
var
ied
from
45%
in V
alen
cia
in 1
990–
1993
to94
.5%
in C
aste
llon
in 1
997–
1999
.
HIV
Resp
onsib
ility
for A
IDS
is sh
ared
bet
wee
n th
e ce
ntra
lgo
vern
men
t and
the
Aut
onom
ous
Com
mun
ities
,al
thou
gh th
e M
inis
try o
f Hea
lth is
the
key
spon
sor
ofth
e N
atio
nal P
lan
Aga
inst
AID
S (th
e fir
st on
e w
asap
prov
ed in
199
7, a
nd w
as fo
llow
ed b
y a
new
one
in 2
001)
. A m
ultis
ecto
ral a
ppro
ach
(com
mun
itypa
rtici
patio
n, c
oord
inat
ion
of c
entra
l/re
gion
al/l
ocal
adm
inist
ratio
n, in
terd
iscip
linar
y ap
proa
ch),
strat
egie
sof
pro
ven
effe
ctiv
enes
s an
d eq
uity
(hum
an r
ight
s,to
lera
nce
and
solid
arity
; equ
al o
ppor
tuni
ties
and
non-
disc
rimin
atio
n; r
educ
tion
of v
ulne
rabi
lity)
are
som
e of
the
prin
cipl
es g
over
ning
the
New
Pla
n(2
001–
2005
). A
ctio
n in
this
are
a is
dire
cted
tow
ards
bet
ter k
now
ledg
e an
d an
alys
is of
the
real
ityof
the
epid
emic
; the
dev
elop
men
t of p
reve
ntio
n pr
ogra
mm
es (i
nfor
mat
ion
cam
paig
ns, n
eedl
eex
chan
ge, p
reve
ntio
n of
sex
ual t
rans
mis
sion
,m
etha
done
sub
stitu
tion
prog
ram
mes
); tra
inin
g an
d su
ppor
t pro
gram
mes
for
heal
th c
are
staff;
re
com
men
datio
ns o
n tre
atm
ent;
scre
enin
g, e
tc.
Chla
mydia
Ther
e is
no
spec
ific
Chl
amyd
iasc
reen
ing
prog
ram
me.
How
ever
, the
cont
rol a
nd p
reve
ntio
n of
sex
ually
trans
mitt
ed d
isea
ses
is in
clud
edam
ong
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
HIV
infe
ctio
n an
d A
IDS
Mul
tisec
tora
lPl
an 2
001–
2005
. “I
nten
sify
act
iviti
es fo
r pr
even
tion,
early
dia
gnos
is a
nd tr
eatm
ent o
fin
fect
ions
ass
ocia
ted
with
dru
g us
e,he
patit
is, t
uber
culo
sis
and
STD
s, a
sw
ell a
s H
IV, f
rom
hea
lth c
entre
s an
ddr
ug a
buse
trea
tmen
t ser
vice
s”(“
Prev
entio
n in
intra
veno
us d
rug
user
s”, H
IV In
fect
ion
and
AID
SM
ultis
ecto
ral P
lan
2001
–200
5).
“Offe
r co
mpr
ehen
sive
car
e to
wom
en th
at in
clud
es e
arly
det
ectio
nof
STD
s (h
erpe
s, C
hlam
ydia
and
HPV
) and
cer
vica
l can
cer”
Spain
40
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Tuber
culo
sis
Som
e ex
ampl
es o
f reg
iona
l TB
cont
rol a
nd p
reve
ntio
n pr
ogra
mm
es:
The
Dep
artm
ent o
f Hea
lth o
f Cas
tilla
y L
eón
has
deve
lope
d a
prog
ram
me
for
prev
entio
n an
d co
ntro
l of
TB (1
999)
. It d
efin
es th
e ta
rget
pop
ulat
ion
(peo
ple
with
cl
inic
al h
isto
ry c
ompa
tible
with
TB;
rel
ativ
es a
nd p
eopl
e w
hoha
ve b
een
in c
onta
ct w
ith T
B pa
tient
s; h
igh-
risk
popu
latio
n),
the
obje
ctiv
e (to
red
uce
TB p
reva
lenc
e by
200
7) a
nd th
eac
tions
to b
e ta
ken.
Th
e TB
con
trol a
nd p
reve
ntio
n pr
ogra
mm
e of
the
Dep
artm
ent o
f Hea
lth o
f Val
enci
a gi
ves
resp
onsi
bilit
y fo
r TB
dete
ctio
n to
pub
lic h
ealth
pro
fess
iona
ls in
prim
ary
care
set
tings
.Th
ese
agen
cies
aim
to a
ctiv
ely
cont
rol h
igh-
risk
popu
latio
ns(H
IV in
fect
ed, d
rug
addi
cts,
pris
oner
s an
d in
stitu
tiona
lized
men
tally
ill,
imm
igra
nts,
the
polic
e fo
rce
and
med
ical
pe
rson
nel).
Tre
atm
ent i
s pr
ovid
ed b
y sp
ecia
lists.
Pub
lic h
ealth
adm
inis
tratio
n is
res
pons
ible
for
regi
stry,
info
rmat
ion
and
heal
th k
now
ledg
e in
itiat
ives
.
HIV
Rece
ntly,
AID
S pa
tient
s w
ere
incl
uded
in th
e gr
oup
whi
ch p
ays
a re
duce
d ch
arge
for
med
icin
es.
The
HIV
tests
can
be
carr
ied
out i
n Sp
ain
free
ofch
ange
and
con
fiden
tially
thro
ugho
ut th
e N
atio
nal
Hea
lth S
yste
m.
Sinc
e 19
83 th
ere
has
been
a N
atio
nal H
IVRe
gistr
y an
d si
nce
the
end
of th
e 19
80s
all
Aut
onom
ous
Com
mun
ities
hav
e ha
d th
eir
own
Regi
onal
HIV
Reg
istry
. H
IV s
urve
illan
ce c
onsi
sts o
f per
iodi
c su
rvey
sai
med
at r
epre
sent
ativ
e gr
oups
of t
he g
ener
al
popu
latio
n as
wel
l as
targ
et p
opul
atio
n gr
oups
as
defin
ed in
the
HIV
Infe
ctio
n an
d A
IDS
Mul
tisec
tora
l Pla
n 20
01–2
005
(ado
lesc
ents
and
youn
g pe
ople
, int
rave
nous
dru
g us
ers,
com
mer
cial
sex
wor
kers
, hom
osex
uals,
wom
en, p
rison
ers,
imm
igra
nts
and
ethn
ic m
inor
ities
).
Chla
mydia
In 1
990
a C
hlam
ydia
scre
enin
gpr
ogra
mm
e w
as im
plem
ente
d in
the
Fam
ily P
lann
ing
Cen
tre “
Mig
uel
Serv
et”
in L
a C
oruñ
a. T
he m
ain
obje
ctiv
e of
the
prog
ram
me
was
tore
duce
the
prev
alen
ce o
f Chl
amyd
iain
the
area
(at t
hat t
ime
the
prev
alen
cera
te a
mon
g w
omen
was
5.1
%).
Spec
ific
aim
s in
clud
ed th
e re
duct
ion
of th
e pr
eval
ence
by
50%
dur
ing
the
first
year
(199
0–19
91) a
nd th
en b
yan
add
ition
al 5
0% d
urin
g th
e ne
xttw
o ye
ars
(199
2–19
93) t
o re
ach
apr
eval
ence
rat
e of
1.2
–1.3
%.
Spain
con
t.
Tabl
e A
1.1
con
t.
41
Tuber
culo
sis
Ther
e is
no
natio
nal s
cree
ning
pro
gram
me
for
TB.
In S
wed
en, g
ener
al v
acci
natio
n ce
ased
in 1
975,
and
sin
ce th
en c
hild
ren
have
been
pro
tect
ed b
y m
eans
of t
arge
ted
actio
n. In
eve
ry c
ase
of T
B, a
n an
alys
is o
fth
e in
fect
ion
is c
arrie
d ou
t for
sur
vey
purp
oses
, and
chi
ldre
n w
ho h
ave
com
e in
tocl
ose
cont
act w
ith th
e sic
k pe
rson
are
vac
cina
ted.
Vac
cina
tion
is al
so re
com
men
ded
for
all c
hild
ren
of im
mig
rant
s fro
m c
ount
ries
whe
re T
B is
mor
e pr
eval
ent t
han
inSw
eden
, as
wel
l as
for
child
ren
trave
lling
to s
uch
coun
tries
, and
thos
e w
ho w
ill b
eliv
ing
in c
lose
con
tact
with
the
loca
l pop
ulat
ion.
All
asyl
um s
eeke
rs a
re a
lso o
ffere
d PP
D te
sting
at t
heir
first
heal
th c
heck
-up,
as
are
preg
nant
wom
en if
thei
r hi
story
sug
gests
that
they
mig
ht b
e co
nsid
ered
at r
isk.
The
Nat
iona
l Boa
rd o
f Hea
lth a
nd W
elfa
re r
elea
sed
guid
elin
es in
199
0 on
pr
even
tive
mea
sure
s co
ncer
ning
TB
but t
hese
are
cur
rent
ly u
nder
rev
isio
n.
HIV
and C
hla
mydia
Nat
iona
l stra
tegi
es fo
r th
e en
tire
area
of h
ealth
and
sex
ualit
y ar
epr
esen
tly la
ckin
g an
d w
ill b
e de
velo
ped
by th
e N
atio
nal I
nstit
ute
ofPu
blic
Hea
lth. I
n ad
ditio
n, w
ork
has
been
initi
ated
on
esta
blis
hing
an
actio
n pl
an fo
r th
e pr
even
tion
of u
nwan
ted
preg
nanc
ies.
This
is b
ased
on
prev
entiv
e w
ork
carr
ied
out u
nder
pro
visi
ons
ofth
e C
omm
unic
able
Dis
ease
s A
ct, t
he H
ealth
and
Med
ical
Ser
vice
sA
ct a
nd th
e pu
blic
hea
lth p
olic
y of
the
Nat
iona
l Ins
titut
e of
Pub
licH
ealth
with
res
pect
to H
IV a
nd S
TIs,
as
wel
l as
with
in th
e fra
mew
ork
of v
ario
us r
egio
nal/
loca
l pro
gram
mes
.C
urre
ntly,
scr
eeni
ng fo
r C
hlam
ydia
and
HIV
is o
ppor
tuni
stic
with
preg
nant
wom
en b
eing
offe
red
tests
, as
are
thos
e di
spla
ying
ris
kbe
havi
ours
.
Swed
en
Tuber
culo
sis
No
natio
nal s
cree
ning
pro
gram
me.
H
IV a
nd C
hla
mydia
HIV
testi
ng is
offe
red
to w
omen
in e
arly
pre
gnan
cy. T
estin
g is
com
pulso
ry fo
r bl
ood
and
orga
n do
nors
.O
ppor
tuni
stic
scre
enin
g fo
r C
hlam
ydia
is o
ffere
d to
thos
e ag
ed 2
5 an
d un
der
who
acc
ess
sexu
al h
ealth
ser
vice
sor
prim
ary
care
.
United
Kin
gdom
42
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
r, b
reast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rTh
ere
are
two
maj
or s
yste
ms
in p
lace
with
reg
ard
to s
cree
ning
for
the
abov
e-m
entio
ned
form
s of
can
cer.
Ever
y A
ustri
an o
ver
the
age
of 1
9 is
ent
itled
to a
ttend
a v
olun
tary
pre
caut
iona
ry c
heck
-up
once
a y
ear,
free
of c
harg
e. T
his
exam
inat
ion
cons
ists
of a
sta
ndar
d pa
rt fo
r bo
th s
exes
(blo
od te
st, u
rine
test,
sto
ol te
st,cl
inic
al e
xam
inat
ion
of th
e bo
dy in
clud
ing
the
brea
st an
d th
e re
ctum
, per
sona
l ses
sion
with
the
doct
or) a
nda
gyna
ecol
ogic
al p
art f
or w
omen
con
sisti
ng o
f a g
ener
al g
ynae
colo
gica
l exa
min
atio
n an
d a
smea
r te
st.
In 2
002
abou
t 1 m
illio
n pr
ecau
tiona
ry c
heck
-ups
at a
cos
t of a
bout
€62
mill
ion
wer
e ca
rrie
d ou
t. O
nem
illio
n ch
eck-
ups
corr
espo
nd to
13.
6% o
f all
thos
e el
igib
le. O
f the
se, 6
5% w
ere
mal
e an
d 35
% fe
mal
e.
The
conc
ept o
f the
pre
caut
iona
ry c
heck
-up
is c
urre
ntly
bei
ng r
evis
ed. B
esid
es s
ome
new
exa
min
atio
ns,
the
mai
n fo
cus
of th
e “V
orso
rgeu
nter
such
ung
– N
eu”
lies
in h
ealth
y lif
esty
le a
dvic
e. In
ord
er to
incr
ease
pa
rtici
patio
n in
the
prec
autio
nary
che
ck-u
p an
invi
tatio
n pr
ogra
mm
e (C
all/
Reca
ll Sc
hem
e) is
pla
nned
.Pe
ople
bet
wee
n 19
and
40
will
get
an
invi
tatio
n ev
ery
thre
e ye
ars,
and
thos
e ov
er 4
0 ev
ery
two
year
s.Pe
ople
ove
r 50
will
be
info
rmed
abo
ut in
testi
nal c
ance
r, an
d w
omen
ove
r 40
abo
ut th
e po
ssib
ility
of
havi
ng a
mam
mog
raph
y ev
ery
two
year
s.Be
side
s th
e pr
ecau
tiona
ry c
heck
-up,
wom
en a
re a
sked
to a
ttend
a g
ynae
colo
gica
l rou
tine
cont
rol
appo
intm
ent o
n a
year
ly b
asis
whe
n a
smea
r te
st is
car
ried
out.
Cur
rent
ly th
ere
is n
o ca
ll an
d re
call
syste
m e
stabl
ishe
d bu
t thi
s is
bei
ng d
evel
oped
.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aIn
the
cour
se o
f the
“A
ustri
an E
arly
-reco
gniti
onpr
ogra
mm
e fo
r inh
erite
d m
etab
olic
diso
rder
s”ev
ery
new
born
chi
ld is
scr
eene
d fo
r PK
U.
Ther
e is
no
univ
ersa
l com
pulso
ry s
yste
m o
fsc
reen
ing
for
Dow
n sy
ndro
me
in p
lace
.Ph
ysic
ians
are
obl
iged
to in
form
an
expe
ctan
tm
othe
r ab
out t
he p
ossi
bilit
y of
vol
unta
rysc
reen
ing
for
the
cond
ition
.Th
e po
ssib
le in
corp
orat
ion
of s
cree
ning
fo
r D
own
synd
rom
e an
d ot
her
pren
atal
exam
inat
ions
into
the
mot
her-c
hild
pas
s is
curr
ently
und
er d
iscu
ssio
n.
Ther
e is
no
syste
mat
ic s
cree
ning
for
spin
abi
fida.
Aust
ria
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rA
pro
gram
me
of c
ervi
cal c
ance
r sc
reen
ing
has
been
run
ning
sin
ce 1
994
whe
n th
e Fl
emis
hG
over
nmen
t dec
ided
to re
orie
nt th
e or
gani
zatio
nof
sec
onda
ry p
reve
ntio
n of
cer
vica
l can
cer
acco
rdin
g to
Eur
opea
n gu
idel
ines
. Sin
ce th
en,
early
det
ectio
n of
cer
vica
l can
cer
has
mov
edgr
adua
lly fr
om th
e str
ictly
opp
ortu
nisti
c to
mor
eor
gani
zed
scre
enin
g. It
targ
ets
wom
enbe
twee
n th
e ag
es o
f 25
and
64, w
ho a
re
invi
ted
to h
ave
a Pa
p sm
ear
take
n on
ce e
very
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rBa
sed
on th
e di
rect
ives
dev
elop
ed b
y Eu
rope
Aga
inst
Can
cer,
the
Com
mun
ities
and
the
fede
ral
gove
rnm
ent s
igne
d a
prot
ocol
on
25 O
ctob
er20
00 to
org
aniz
e an
d fin
ance
, on
a na
tiona
lsc
ale,
a c
ampa
ign
of b
reas
t can
cer
scre
enin
g fo
r w
omen
bet
wee
n th
e ag
es o
f 50
and
69.
The
fede
ral g
over
nmen
t pay
s fo
r th
e ra
diol
ogic
alco
sts. T
he o
rgan
izat
iona
l cos
ts ar
e pa
id b
y th
eC
omm
uniti
es. T
he r
espo
nsib
ility
for
coor
dina
ting
the
cam
paig
n is
giv
en to
rec
ogni
zed
scre
enin
g
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aTh
e de
tect
ion
of P
KU fa
lls u
nder
the
Com
mun
ities
’pr
ogra
mm
e of
mas
s sc
reen
ing
of c
onge
nita
lm
etab
olic
dis
orde
rs. T
he C
omm
uniti
es fi
x th
eco
nditi
ons
whi
ch th
e ce
ntre
s fo
r th
e de
tect
ion
ofco
ngen
itally
met
abol
ic d
evia
tions
mus
t ful
fil. N
orm
ally
a bl
ood
sam
ple
is ta
ken
on th
e fif
th d
ay a
fter
birth
.D
own
synd
rom
e: d
urin
g pr
egna
ncy,
at l
east
thre
eul
traso
und
exam
inat
ions
can
be
reim
burs
ed b
yna
tiona
l hea
lth in
sura
nce.
Thi
s is
usu
ally
car
ried
out
as a
rou
tine
exam
inat
ion
to fo
llow
the
norm
al
Bel
giu
m
Tabl
e A
1.2
Cer
vica
l can
cer,
brea
st c
ance
r, co
lore
ctal
can
cer,
PKU
, Dow
n sy
ndro
me
and
spin
a bi
fida
43
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rth
ree
year
s. T
he p
rogr
amm
e is
adm
inis
tere
dan
d ru
n by
the
Scie
ntifi
c In
stitu
te o
f Pub
licH
ealth
in c
olla
bora
tion
with
the
Com
mun
ities
.D
espi
te s
cien
tific
sup
port,
no
form
al s
cree
ning
prog
ram
me
is o
rgan
ized
in th
e Fr
ench
Com
mun
ity. A
ccor
ding
to th
e 20
01 h
ealth
inte
rvie
w s
urve
y, 7
0% o
f wom
en b
etw
een
25an
d 64
had
a P
ap s
mea
r ta
ken
in th
e pr
evio
us th
ree
year
s. N
ew s
cree
ning
met
hods
will
be
eval
uate
d by
the
Scie
ntifi
cIn
stitu
te o
f Pub
lic H
ealth
.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rce
ntre
s. E
leve
n sc
reen
ing
cent
res
have
bee
nid
entif
ied:
five
in W
allo
nia
(one
per
pro
vinc
e),
five
in F
land
ers
(in th
e fo
ur F
lem
ish
univ
ersi
ties
and
one
in B
ruge
s) a
nd o
ne in
Bru
ssel
s. T
hesc
reen
ing
cent
res
are
resp
onsi
ble
for
iden
tifyi
ngth
e ta
rget
gro
up, s
endi
ng in
vita
tions
, the
sec
ond
read
ing,
rec
ordi
ng o
f dat
a an
d fo
r re
porti
ng to
the
refe
rrin
g do
ctor
. In
Flan
ders
the
cam
paig
nsta
rted
on 1
5 Ju
ne 2
001;
and
in W
allo
nia
and
Brus
sels,
in J
une
2002
.Th
ere
is n
o sp
ecifi
c go
vern
men
t pol
icy
onsc
reen
ing
for
colo
n an
d re
ctal
can
cer.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
ade
velo
pmen
t of t
he fe
tus.
Bet
wee
n w
eeks
10
and
14of
pre
gnan
cy a
spe
cific
ultr
asou
nd in
to a
bnor
mal
accu
mul
atio
n of
liqu
id in
the
neck
of t
he fo
etus
can
be c
ondu
cted
. On
the
basi
s of
this
res
earc
h, D
own
synd
rom
e ca
n be
iden
tifie
d. T
he p
rese
nce
of a
ch
rom
osom
al a
bnor
mal
ity c
an o
nly
be c
onfir
med
by
an
addi
tiona
l tes
t suc
h as
an
amni
ocen
tesi
s.Th
ese
form
s of
ant
enat
al d
iagn
osis
are
onl
y of
fere
dto
cou
ples
with
an
incr
ease
d ris
k.Sp
ina
bifid
a ca
n al
so b
e de
tect
ed d
urin
g th
epr
egna
ncy
thro
ugh
a bl
ood
test,
an
ultra
soun
d or
an
am
nioc
ente
sis.
Bel
giu
m c
ont.
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rTh
ere
is n
ow (a
rec
ent d
evel
opm
ent)
afre
e sc
reen
ing
prog
ram
me
in e
very
one
of th
e co
untry
’s 14
cou
nty
coun
cils.
The
prog
ram
mes
are
bas
ed o
n th
e re
gion
s’po
pula
tion
regi
sters
use
d fo
r ca
ll an
dre
call.
Wom
en a
re in
vite
d fo
r a
Pap
smea
r ev
ery
third
yea
r by
thei
r G
P.Ty
pica
lly, t
wo
rem
inde
r le
tters
are
sen
tif
no a
ppoi
ntm
ent h
as b
een
mad
e af
ter
the
first
lette
r. W
omen
age
d 23
–59
are
invi
ted,
exc
ept i
n C
open
hage
n co
unty
coun
cils
whe
re th
e in
vita
tion
is ex
tend
edon
ly to
thos
e ag
ed 2
5–45
. Som
eco
unty
cou
ncils
are
also
targ
etin
gw
omen
age
d 60
–74.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rSc
reen
ing
prog
ram
mes
for
brea
st ca
ncer
are
esta
blis
hed
in tw
o of
the
14 c
ount
y co
unci
ls(F
unen
and
H:S
). Th
ese
cove
r 20
% o
f the
popu
latio
n. In
thos
e ar
eas
wom
en a
ged
50–6
9 ar
e in
vite
d fo
r sc
reen
ing.
The
re h
asbe
en c
onsi
dera
ble
deba
te o
n br
east
canc
ersc
reen
ing
in D
enm
ark
with
som
e co
unty
co
unci
ls ar
guin
g th
at th
e ev
iden
ce o
f ben
efit
is in
conc
lusi
ve.
Col
on a
nd r
ecta
l can
cer:
a te
am o
fex
perts
from
the
Nat
iona
l Boa
rd o
f Hea
lthha
s re
com
men
ded
scre
enin
g fo
r co
lore
ctal
canc
er a
nd a
tria
l is
taki
ng p
lace
in tw
o of
the
coun
ty c
ounc
ils. M
en a
nd w
omen
age
d50
–74
are
invi
ted
to p
artic
ipat
e an
d th
ese
rvic
e is
free
.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aEv
ery
child
bor
n in
Den
mar
k is
offe
red
a ro
utin
e ex
amin
atio
nfo
r PK
U. T
he e
xam
inat
ion
is m
ade
via
a bl
ood
test
carr
ied
out i
n th
e fir
st w
eek
afte
r th
e ch
ild is
bor
n, w
hich
mak
es th
edi
seas
e pr
even
tabl
e. It
is th
e re
spon
sibi
lity
of th
e m
idw
ife to
ensu
re th
at th
e te
st is
car
ried
out o
n th
e ch
ild’s
fifth
day
of l
ife(in
pra
ctic
e th
is is
don
e be
twee
n da
ys 4
and
10)
, reg
ardl
ess
of w
heth
er th
e ch
ild is
del
iver
ed a
t hom
e or
whe
ther
the
mot
her
has
been
dis
char
ged
from
hos
pita
l. Th
e sa
me
test
is u
sed
tosc
reen
for
low
ered
met
abol
ism
. D
own
synd
rom
e an
d sp
ina
bifid
a: in
Sep
tem
ber
2004
The
Nat
iona
l Boa
rd o
f Hea
lth c
hang
ed th
e gu
idel
ines
on
embr
yodi
agno
stics
from
aut
omat
ic s
elec
tion
crite
ria (e
.g. a
ge),
to
indi
vidu
al c
hoic
e. P
regn
ant w
omen
are
giv
en th
e op
tion
of a
nex
amin
atio
n th
at in
dica
tes
a ris
k of
Dow
n sy
ndro
me,
as
wel
las
a te
st fo
r sp
ina
bifid
a. T
here
will
also
be
mor
e in
form
atio
nav
aila
ble
on h
elp
and
supp
ort.
Den
mark
44
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rSc
reen
ing
for
cerv
ical
can
cer
was
sta
rted
at th
e be
ginn
ing
ofth
e 19
60s.
Acc
ordi
ng to
the
Publ
ic H
ealth
Act
, wom
enag
ed 3
0–60
yea
rs a
re c
alle
dev
ery
fifth
yea
r fo
r sc
reen
ing.
The
Finn
ish
mun
icip
aliti
es a
rere
spon
sibl
e fo
r or
gani
zing
and
finan
cing
scr
eeni
ng a
nd th
eFi
nnis
h ca
ncer
org
aniz
atio
nsha
ve p
ropo
sed
that
it s
houl
dbe
ext
ende
d to
incl
ude
25-y
ear-o
ld w
omen
. In
2003
,a
tota
l of 1
57 c
ervi
cal c
ance
rca
ses
wer
e fo
und.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aSc
reen
ing
of P
KU fo
r the
nat
ive
Finn
ish p
opul
atio
n is
not c
onsid
ered
nec
essa
ry.
If bo
th th
e m
othe
r an
d fa
ther
are
of w
este
rn E
urop
ean,
Am
eric
an, o
r e.
g.Je
wis
h, K
urd
or Y
ugos
lav
orig
in, a
PKU
test
is p
erfo
rmed
on
neon
ates
. Pa
rtici
patio
n in
the
scre
enin
g of
Dow
n sy
ndro
me
is v
olun
tary
. Alm
ost a
llm
unic
ipal
ities
offe
r ul
traso
und
scan
ning
in w
eeks
13–
14 a
nd 1
6–19
of
preg
nanc
y. A
mni
ocen
tesi
s an
d se
rum
scr
eeni
ng is
pro
vide
d to
wom
enbe
twee
n 35
and
40
year
s of
age
(the
age
lim
it de
pend
s on
the
mun
icip
ality
,e.
g. in
Hel
sink
i the
age
lim
it is
40
year
s)In
mun
icip
aliti
es w
hich
offe
r sc
reen
ing,
all
preg
nant
wom
en in
the
age
cate
gory
are
invi
ted
for
the
test.
Pa
rtici
patio
n in
spi
na b
ifida
scr
eeni
ng is
vol
unta
ry. A
lmos
t all
mun
icip
aliti
esof
fer
ultra
soun
d sc
anni
ng in
wee
ks 1
3–14
and
16–
19 o
f pre
gnan
cy.
Finla
nd
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rSc
reen
ing
for
brea
st ca
ncer
was
in
trodu
ced
in 1
987.
Acc
ordi
ng to
the
Publ
ic H
ealth
Act
wom
en b
etw
een
the
ages
of5
0 an
d 59
are
cal
led
ever
yse
cond
yea
r fo
r sc
reen
ing.
The
Fin
nish
mun
icip
aliti
es a
re r
espo
nsib
le fo
ror
gani
zing
and
fina
ncin
g th
is s
cree
ning
.Th
e Fi
nnis
h ca
ncer
org
aniz
atio
ns h
ave
prop
osed
that
it s
houl
d be
ext
ende
d to
incl
ude
the
age
grou
p 60
–69.
In 2
003,
3779
bre
ast c
ance
r ca
ses
wer
e fo
und.
A p
ilot p
roje
ct fo
r sc
reen
ing
for
colo
nan
d re
ctal
can
cer
in m
en a
nd w
omen
aged
60–
69 w
as in
trodu
ced
in 2
004
inse
vera
l mun
icip
aliti
es.
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rC
ance
r sc
reen
ing
strat
egie
s ar
e an
impo
rtant
part
of th
e N
atio
nal C
ance
r Pla
n im
plem
ente
din
200
3 fo
r th
e 20
02–2
006
perio
d.N
atio
nal t
echn
ical
gro
ups
have
bee
n cr
eate
dto
dev
elop
scr
eeni
ng p
rogr
amm
es. C
ervi
cal
canc
er s
cree
ning
is o
ffere
d to
wom
en a
ged
25–6
9 ev
ery
thre
e ye
ars.
The
par
ticip
atio
nra
te, e
stim
ated
in fi
ve r
egio
ns, i
s 25
%, a
ndth
e pl
an ta
rget
s ar
e 80
%. T
he F
renc
hN
atio
nal A
genc
y fo
r A
ccre
dita
tion
and
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rBr
east
canc
er s
cree
ning
, pre
viou
sly li
mite
d to
som
e dé
parte
men
ts(3
2 at
the
end
of 2
002)
, has
bee
n ex
tend
edna
tionw
ide
sinc
e 1
Janu
ary
2004
(exc
ept f
or G
uyan
a): e
very
wom
an a
ged
betw
een
50 a
nd 7
4 is
invi
ted
for
a fre
e br
east
scre
enin
g ev
ery
two
year
s. B
reas
t scr
eeni
ng p
rogr
amm
es in
Fran
ce a
re a
dmin
iste
red
by m
anag
emen
t tea
ms
in e
ach
dépa
rtem
ent,
whi
ch s
ends
invi
tatio
ns to
targ
eted
wom
en.
Brea
st ca
ncer
scr
eeni
ng is
per
form
ed m
ainl
y by
inde
pend
ent
prof
essi
onal
s (9
0% o
f scr
eeni
ngs)
and
join
tly fi
nanc
ed b
yge
nera
l cou
ncils
and
hea
lth in
sura
nce
fund
s.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aD
own
synd
rom
e is
sys
tem
atic
ally
sou
ght i
npr
enat
al e
xam
inat
ions
. A b
lood
test
isof
fere
d to
eve
ry p
regn
ant w
oman
.A
mni
ocen
tesi
s is
sys
tem
atic
ally
offe
red
topa
tient
s at
ris
k: m
othe
rs a
ged
38 o
r ol
der,
thos
e w
ith a
“po
sitiv
e” b
lood
test,
or
inw
hom
a d
efec
t has
bee
n de
tect
ed in
apr
evio
us p
regn
ancy
, and
whe
re th
ere
isev
iden
ce o
f a c
hrom
osom
al d
efec
t in
pare
nts.
The
cos
t of t
he b
lood
test
is
France
Tabl
e A
1.2
con
t.
45
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rEv
alua
tion
in H
ealth
(AN
AES
) ass
esse
d th
ebe
nefit
s of
the
Hum
an p
apill
oma
viru
s (H
PV)
test
and
did
not r
ecom
men
d its
sys
tem
atic
use
in a
ssoc
iatio
n w
ith th
e Pa
p te
st.H
owev
er, t
he H
PV te
st w
as in
clud
ed in
the
prof
essi
onal
s’ fe
e sc
hedu
le in
Dec
embe
r20
03 a
nd h
as b
een
reim
burs
ed in
cas
es o
fsu
spic
ious
Pap
test
resu
lts s
ince
Jan
uary
2004
. A r
ecen
t stu
dy e
stim
ated
that
35%
of
wom
en a
ged
25–6
9 ha
ve n
ever
, or
rare
ly,ha
d a
Pap
test.
Tar
gete
d m
essa
ges
will
be
used
to r
each
thes
e w
omen
and
the
upta
keof
Pap
tests
cou
ld b
e in
crea
sed
by th
epa
rtici
patio
n of
GPs
(96%
of P
ap te
sts a
recu
rren
tly c
arrie
d ou
t by
gyna
ecol
ogis
ts).
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rC
ance
r sc
reen
ing
exam
inat
ions
are
exe
mpt
ed fr
om th
e us
ers’
parti
cipa
tion
of €
1.C
olor
ecta
l can
cer
scre
enin
g ha
s be
en th
e su
bjec
t of t
rials
in 2
2 dé
parte
men
ts. P
relim
inar
y m
easu
res
wer
e ne
eded
tore
solv
e pr
oble
ms
rela
ted
to th
e pa
ymen
t of p
hysi
cian
s an
d to
the
posta
l tra
nspo
rting
of H
emoc
cult®
tests
. In
this
prog
ram
me,
men
and
wom
en a
ged
50 to
74
are
invi
ted
ever
y tw
o ye
ars
for
a fa
ecal
occ
ult b
lood
test
(FO
BT).
If th
is is
pos
itive
, aco
lono
scop
y w
ill b
e ca
rrie
d ou
t. Th
e pr
ogra
mm
e w
ill b
e ev
alua
ted
at th
e en
d of
200
5 to
def
ine
the
natio
nal s
trate
gyfo
r 20
07 (t
his
is th
e 53
rdob
ject
ive
of th
e Pu
blic
Hea
lth A
ct
of 2
004)
. The
firs
t res
ults
show
ed a
n in
crea
sing
rat
e of
pa
rtici
patio
n (u
p to
50%
in s
ome
dépa
rtem
ents)
than
ks to
stron
g pa
rtici
patio
n by
GPs
. The
tria
l inc
lude
s a
com
para
tive
asse
ssm
ent o
f tw
o te
sts (H
emoc
cult
II® v
ersu
s M
agstr
eam
).
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
are
imbu
rsed
by
soci
al s
ecur
ity if
car
ried
out b
etw
een
the
15th
and
the
18th
wee
ksof
pre
gnan
cy. T
he p
atie
nt h
as to
sig
n a
cons
ent f
orm
. Am
nioc
ente
sis
is a
lso
reim
burs
ed.
Neo
nata
l exa
min
atio
ns a
re r
outin
e fo
rne
wbo
rns
and
incl
ude
bloo
d te
sting
for
PKU,
cong
enita
l hyp
othy
roid
ism
, adr
enal
hype
rpla
sia,
hae
mog
lobi
nopa
thie
s/si
ckle
cell
anae
mia
, and
cys
tic fi
bros
is.
Spin
a bi
fida
is d
etec
ted
by u
ltras
ound
in w
eek
17 o
f pre
gnan
cy.
France
con
t.
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
r, b
reast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rTh
ere
is a
nat
iona
l pro
gram
me
for
brea
st ca
ncer
, cer
vica
l can
cer
and
colo
rect
al c
ance
r fo
r SH
I-ins
ured
indi
vidu
als.
Priv
ate
heal
th in
sure
rs w
ill p
ay fo
r op
portu
nisti
c sc
reen
ing.
Opp
ortu
nisti
c sc
reen
ing
for
brea
st ca
ncer
use
d to
be
wid
ely
prac
tised
. Bre
ast c
ance
r sc
reen
ing
has
been
rec
ently
reo
rgan
ized
tow
ards
a s
yste
mat
ic s
cree
ning
pro
gram
me,
at l
east
in w
omen
age
d 50
–69
who
are
invi
ted
regu
larly
. The
scr
eeni
ng is
sub
ject
ed to
tigh
t, ev
iden
ce-b
ased
qua
lity
assu
ranc
e m
easu
res.
The
scre
enin
g pr
ogra
mm
e is
org
aniz
ed s
epar
atel
y fro
m th
e di
seas
e m
anag
emen
t pro
gram
me
for
(the
treat
men
t of)
brea
st ca
ncer
, int
rodu
ced
in 2
003.
Fo
r ce
rvic
al a
nd c
olor
ecta
l can
cer
as w
ell a
s pr
osta
te c
ance
r di
rect
ives
of j
oint
com
mitt
ees
defin
e th
eta
rget
gro
ups,
the
scre
enin
g in
terv
al a
nd ty
pe o
f int
erve
ntio
n th
at is
pai
d fo
r by
SH
I. D
irect
ives
also
sp
ecify
qua
lity
assu
ranc
e re
quire
men
ts fo
r ph
ysic
ians
who
see
k re
imbu
rsem
ent f
rom
sic
knes
s fu
nds.
Th
ose
insu
red
are
enco
urag
ed to
par
ticip
ate
via
heal
th jo
urna
ls an
d ce
lebr
ity-le
d ca
mpa
igns
, but
are
not
invi
ted
indi
vidu
ally.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aPK
Ute
sting
is p
art o
f the
rou
tine
neon
atal
exam
inat
ions
for
babi
es a
nd is
fina
nced
by S
HI.
Ther
e ar
e na
tiona
l scr
eeni
ng p
olic
ies
for
preg
nanc
y w
ithin
SH
I, bu
t as
yet t
here
are
no s
peci
fic n
atio
nal s
cree
ning
pol
icie
s fo
rD
own
synd
rom
eor
spi
na b
ifida
. Tes
ting
for
Dow
n sy
ndro
me
and
spin
a bi
fida,
as
part
of tw
o ul
traso
unds
for
case
-find
ing
durin
g pr
egna
ncy,
is p
aid
for
by S
HI.
Ger
many
46
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
r, b
reast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rTh
ere
is n
o na
tiona
l pol
icy
on s
cree
ning
for
cerv
ical
can
cer,
brea
st ca
ncer
or
colo
n an
dre
ctal
can
cer
in G
reec
e. T
here
hav
e be
en s
ever
al s
pora
dic
initi
ativ
es d
evel
oped
by
the
Ant
i-Can
cer
Soci
ety
but t
here
is n
o w
ell-d
efin
ed a
nd s
peci
fic p
olic
y fo
r sc
reen
ing.
We
have
cond
ucte
d in
terv
iew
s w
ith:
1. M
inis
try o
f Hea
lth a
nd S
ocia
l Sol
idar
ity2.
KEE
L3.
Ant
i-Can
cer
Soci
ety
(non
gove
rnm
enta
l org
aniz
atio
n).
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aIn
Gre
ece
the
prev
alen
ce o
f PKU
has
bee
n es
timat
ed a
t 1pe
r 77
00 c
hild
ren
in 2
002.
PKU
can
be
diag
nose
d ea
rly in
the
neon
atal
per
iod.
Dow
n sy
ndro
me:
pre
gnan
t wom
en a
re a
sked
to u
nder
goa
bloo
d te
st an
d th
ose
over
35
year
s of
age
are
offe
red
anam
nioc
ente
sis.
N
o in
form
atio
n is
ava
ilabl
e fo
r sp
ina
bifid
a.
Gre
ece
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rPh
ase
1 of
a N
atio
nal C
ervi
cal
Scre
enin
g Pr
ogra
mm
e of
fers
free
cerv
ical
scr
eeni
ng to
wom
en a
ged
25–6
0 ye
ars
in th
e M
id-W
este
rnH
ealth
Boa
rd a
rea
who
are
invi
ted
to r
egis
ter
with
the
prog
ram
me.
Th
e Iri
sh C
ervi
cal S
cree
ning
Prog
ram
me
(ICSP
) aim
s to
ens
ure
that
wom
en o
n th
e re
giste
r ar
ein
vite
d by
lette
r, ov
er a
five
-yea
rsc
reen
ing
perio
d, to
atte
nd fo
r a
free
cerv
ical
sm
ear
test.
Wom
enw
ho h
ave
neve
r ha
d a
prog
ram
me
smea
r ca
n co
ntac
t one
of t
he IC
SPRe
giste
red
Smea
rtake
rs (d
octo
rsan
d nu
rses
) to
disc
uss
havi
ng a
free
smea
r te
st.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rBr
eastC
heck
is Ir
elan
d’s
natio
nal b
reas
t scr
eeni
ng p
rogr
amm
e. T
he a
imof
the
prog
ram
me
is th
e ea
rly d
etec
tion
and
treat
men
t of b
reas
t can
cer
in w
omen
who
sho
w n
o sy
mpt
oms
of th
e di
seas
e. P
hase
1 s
tarte
d in
Febr
uary
200
0 an
d is
in o
pera
tion
in th
e H
ealth
Ser
vice
Exe
cutiv
e(H
SE) E
aste
rn A
rea,
HSE
Mid
land
Are
a an
d H
SE N
orth
Eas
tern
Are
as.
In F
ebru
ary
2003
, the
Min
iste
r fo
r H
ealth
and
Chi
ldre
n an
noun
ced
the
exte
nsio
n of
Bre
astC
heck
in th
e ea
st to
cou
ntie
s W
exfo
rd, K
ilken
nyan
d C
arlo
w. S
cree
ning
sta
rted
in W
exfo
rd in
Mar
ch 2
004
and
in C
arlo
win
Apr
il 20
05. I
t is
expe
cted
to fo
llow
in K
ilken
ny in
ear
ly 2
006.
In M
ay 2
005
the
min
iste
r an
noun
ced
plan
s fo
r th
e de
velo
pmen
t of a
furth
er tw
o Br
eastC
heck
clin
ics
to c
over
the
sout
hern
and
wes
tern
regi
ons
of Ir
elan
d. It
is e
xpec
ted
to b
e av
aila
ble
natio
nally
tow
ards
the
end
of 2
007.
Brea
st sc
reen
ing
outsi
de th
e Br
eastC
heck
pro
gram
me
is a
vaila
ble
toal
l wom
en if
they
are
ref
erre
d by
a G
P. It
is in
clud
ed w
ithin
out
patie
ntpu
blic
hos
pita
l ser
vice
s an
d w
omen
are
not
cha
rged
for
scre
enin
g if
refe
rred
by
a G
P. In
priv
ate
hosp
itals,
they
hav
e to
pay
for
the
serv
ice.
Col
orec
tal c
ance
r is
not c
urre
ntly
scr
eene
d fo
r in
the
gene
ral p
opul
atio
nin
Irel
and.
Cer
tain
indi
vidu
als
are,
how
ever
, mor
e at
ris
k an
d m
ayre
ques
t to
be s
cree
ned.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aA
Nat
iona
l New
born
Scr
eeni
ngPr
ogra
mm
e w
as in
stiga
ted
in Ir
elan
d in
1966
with
initi
al s
cree
ning
for
phen
ylke
tonu
ria.
Scre
enin
g te
sts fo
r D
own
synd
rom
e an
dsp
ina
bifid
aar
e no
t offe
red
rout
inel
y bu
ton
ly in
cas
es c
onsi
dere
d to
be
at h
igh
risk.
Irel
and
Tabl
e A
1.2
con
t.
47
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
r, b
reast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rSc
reen
ing
polic
ies
for
thes
e di
seas
es h
ave
been
incl
uded
in th
e pa
ckag
e of
ess
entia
l lev
els
of c
are
prov
ided
by th
e SS
N (L
EA) b
y D
ecre
e “D
PCM
29/
11/2
001”
. All
Nat
iona
l Hea
lth P
lans
hav
e se
t tar
gets
for t
hese
are
asof
pre
vent
ion.
Reg
iste
rs a
re m
anag
ed a
t reg
iona
l lev
el. I
n th
e pa
st, th
ey w
ere
ofte
n sta
rted
inde
pend
ently
and
only
sub
sequ
ently
inse
rted
into
reg
iona
l hea
lth p
lans
. Scr
eeni
ng p
olic
ies
are
mor
e w
ides
prea
d in
north
ern
and
cent
ral I
taly.
The
re is
usu
ally
a s
yste
m fo
r ta
rget
ing
and
reca
lling
pat
ient
s al
thou
gh th
e ta
rget
popu
latio
n va
ries
acco
rdin
g to
reg
ion.
In U
mbr
ia, f
or b
reas
t can
cer,
the
targ
et p
opul
atio
n in
clud
es w
omen
aged
50–
59; f
or c
ervi
cal c
ance
r 25
–64,
for
colo
rect
al c
ance
r w
omen
and
men
age
d 50
–59.
Each
yea
r, th
ere
are
270
000
new
can
cer
case
s, w
ith 1
5000
0 de
aths
. Can
cer
is th
e se
cond
larg
est
caus
e of
dea
th a
nd in
cide
nce
is c
onsta
ntly
incr
easi
ng. S
ince
200
0, th
e go
vern
men
t has
ado
pted
a s
erie
s of
mea
sure
s ai
med
at p
rom
otin
g th
e w
ides
prea
d an
d un
iform
ado
ptio
n of
scr
eeni
ng p
olic
ies
at n
atio
nal l
evel
.Th
e m
ain
rece
nt p
olic
ies
are
the
follo
win
g:•
The
Budg
et (F
inan
cial
) Law
for t
he y
ear 2
001
(“Le
gge
Fina
nzia
ria”
art.
85) s
et e
xem
ptio
ns fr
om c
o-pa
ymen
t(ti
cket
) mam
mog
raph
ic e
xam
s (o
ne e
very
two
year
s fo
r wom
en a
ged
45–6
9); c
ervi
cal-v
agin
al c
ytol
ogic
alex
amin
atio
ns (o
ne e
very
thre
e ye
ars
for w
omen
age
d 25
–-69
); co
lono
scop
y (e
very
five
yea
rs, f
or m
en a
ndw
omen
age
d ov
er 4
5 an
d th
e po
pula
tion
defin
ed a
s at
risk
by
Min
istry
of H
ealth
dec
rees
). •
In 2
004
an a
gree
men
t bet
wee
n th
e sta
te a
nd th
e re
gion
s w
as s
igne
d th
at in
clud
es in
the
PPA
(Pia
no d
iPr
even
zion
e A
ttiva
) can
cer s
cree
ning
, as
defin
ed b
y th
e EU
Par
liam
ent r
esol
utio
n, a
s on
e of
the
four
stra
tegi
cta
rget
s.
•La
w n
.138
(pub
lishe
d in
the
Offi
cial
Bul
letin
– G
.U. –
on
26/5
/200
4) a
rt. 2
bis,
con
tain
s a
com
mitm
ent t
ocl
ose
the
gap
betw
een
the
targ
et p
opul
atio
n an
d th
e sc
reen
ed p
opul
atio
n, a
lloca
ting
€50
mill
ion
for t
his
targ
et.
•Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of H
ealth
is s
trivi
ng to
impl
emen
t an
effe
ctiv
e ca
ncer
scr
eeni
ng a
nd in
form
atio
n pr
ogra
mm
eat
nat
iona
l lev
el.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aEa
ch r
egio
n ha
s its
ow
n re
gula
tions
.A
nten
atal
scr
eeni
ng is
rec
omm
ende
d by
doct
ors
to w
omen
at r
isk.
Pre
gnan
t wom
enge
t rou
tine
ultra
soun
d ex
amin
atio
ns (a
t afre
quen
cy w
hich
var
ies
betw
een
regi
ons)
but g
enet
ic te
sting
is u
sual
ly o
ffere
d on
ly to
wom
en a
t ris
k.
Ther
e is
no
natio
nal p
olic
y. T
here
are
five
spec
ializ
ed s
pina
bifi
da c
entre
s in
Ital
yth
at p
rom
ote
info
rmat
ion
and
prev
entio
n.
Italy
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
r, b
reast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rTh
ere
is a
nat
iona
l pol
icy
on s
cree
ning
for
cerv
ical
and
bre
ast c
ance
r, bu
t not
for
colo
rect
alca
ncer
. The
se tw
o pr
ogra
mm
es (c
ervi
cal a
nd b
reas
t can
cer)
are
base
d on
a d
efin
ed p
opul
atio
nof
wom
en; t
heir
addr
esse
s ar
e ta
ken
from
the
mun
icip
al p
opul
atio
n re
giste
rs. P
aym
ent i
s ba
sed
on th
e Ex
cept
iona
l Med
ical
Exp
ense
s A
ct (A
WBZ
) (w
hich
is a
uni
vers
al s
ocia
l hea
lth in
sura
nce
sche
me)
and
the
prog
ram
mes
are
elig
ible
for
all w
omen
in th
e de
fined
age
gro
up.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aPK
U: t
here
are
blo
od te
sts fo
r al
l new
born
chi
ldre
n in
the
first
wee
k af
ter
birth
.D
own
synd
rom
e an
d sp
ina
bifid
a: a
trip
le te
st is
av
aila
ble
for
all w
omen
ove
r 35
afte
r th
ree
mon
ths
ofpr
egna
ncy.
Pay
men
t is
base
d on
the
Exce
ptio
nal
Med
ical
Exp
ense
s A
ct (A
WBZ
).
Net
her
lands
48
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rSc
reen
ing
is o
ppor
tuni
stic.
The
re a
re g
uide
lines
for
wom
en to
take
yea
rly s
mea
r te
sts. N
atio
nal P
rogr
am o
f Pre
vent
ion
and
Con
trol t
o O
ncol
ogy
Dise
ases
targ
ets
for s
cree
ning
of c
ervi
cal
canc
er, b
reas
t can
cer
and
colo
n an
d re
ctal
can
cer
are
60%
of
the
targ
et p
opul
atio
n by
201
0. C
ance
r pa
tient
s ar
e ex
empt
edfro
m th
e pa
ymen
t of u
ser
char
ges;
ther
e ar
e no
cha
rges
for
hosp
ital t
reat
men
t; an
d dr
ugs
for
canc
er tr
eatm
ent a
re to
tally
reim
burs
ed b
y th
e sta
te. N
ever
thel
ess,
can
cer
patie
nts
mig
ht p
ayfo
r co
nsum
ptio
n of
oth
er d
rugs
.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rSc
reen
ing
is o
ppor
tuni
stic
and
is d
etec
ted
mos
tly th
roug
h m
amm
ogra
phy.
The
re a
regu
idel
ines
for
wom
en to
take
yea
rlym
amm
ogra
phy.
Scre
enin
g fo
r co
lore
ctal
can
cer
isop
portu
nisti
c. T
here
is n
o na
tiona
l pol
icy
for
this
type
of c
ance
r.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aSc
reen
ing
for
PKU
and
Dow
n sy
ndro
me
isco
mpu
lsory
for
neon
ates
in th
e fir
st w
eek
of li
fe; t
hese
tests
are
free
of c
harg
e.
We
have
no
info
rmat
ion
on s
pina
bifi
da.
Port
ugal
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rC
ervi
cal c
ance
r sc
reen
ing
thro
ugh
cyto
logy
is o
ffere
d to
all
wom
en a
ged
35 a
nd o
ver.
It is
fina
nced
by
publ
icin
sura
nce.
In th
e Ba
lear
ic Is
land
s ce
rvic
al
canc
er s
cree
ning
is o
ppor
tuni
stic.
In C
atal
onia
, the
re is
a p
erso
naliz
edre
giste
r of
all
targ
et in
divi
dual
s(w
omen
age
d 20
–64)
. Cer
vica
l can
cer
scre
enin
g (P
apan
icol
au te
chni
que)
isre
com
men
ded
ever
y th
ree
to fi
ve y
ears
.A
mon
g th
e m
ain
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
Nav
arre
Hea
lth P
lan
2001
–200
5 ar
eth
ose
rela
ted
to e
arly
det
ectio
n of
cerv
ical
can
cer,
brea
st ca
ncer
and
colo
rect
al c
ance
r. Th
e ce
rvic
al c
ance
rpr
ogra
mm
e is
bas
ed o
n oc
casi
onal
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rSi
nce
1990
bre
ast c
ance
r de
tect
ion
prog
ram
mes
hav
ebe
en im
plem
ente
d in
all
Aut
onom
ous
Com
mun
ities
.Th
e pr
ogra
mm
es’ t
arge
t pop
ulat
ion
varie
s ac
ross
regi
ons.
In m
ost o
f the
reg
ions
the
targ
et p
opul
atio
nin
clud
es w
omen
age
d 50
–64/
5. In
thre
e A
uton
omou
sC
omm
uniti
es th
e ta
rget
pop
ulat
ion
is e
xten
ded
to a
llw
omen
bet
wee
n th
e ag
es o
f 45
and
69 (M
adrid
,N
avar
re a
nd V
alen
cia)
. In
Cat
alon
ia a
nd M
urci
aw
omen
bet
wee
n 50
and
69
can
bene
fit fr
om th
e pr
ogra
mm
e. In
Cas
tilla
y L
eón
the
prog
ram
me
cove
rsw
omen
age
d 45
–64/
5. T
he to
tal t
arge
t pop
ulat
ion
in20
03 r
ose
to 3
869
662
and
97.3
% w
ere
actu
ally
cove
red
by th
e pr
ogra
mm
es. F
ree
mam
mog
raph
y is
prov
ided
eve
ry tw
o ye
ars,
as
wel
l as
addi
tiona
l med
ical
and
labo
rato
ry e
xam
inat
ions
whe
n ne
eded
. La
ck o
f kno
wle
dge
and
soci
al a
ccep
tanc
e m
ake
the
dete
ctio
n of
col
orec
tal c
ance
r un
com
mon
. The
re a
repi
lot s
cree
ning
pro
gram
mes
in C
atal
onia
. The
via
bilit
y
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aTh
ere
are
neon
atal
scr
eeni
ng p
rogr
amm
es fo
ren
docr
ine-
met
abol
ic d
isea
ses
(PKU
and
hyp
othy
roid
ism
)in
all
Aut
onom
ous
Com
mun
ities
. The
se p
rogr
amm
essta
rted
in 1
968
in G
rana
da a
nd w
ere
impl
emen
ted
inBa
rcel
ona
and
Mad
rid a
few
yea
rs la
ter.
Sinc
e th
e19
80s
thes
e pr
ogra
mm
es h
ave
been
ext
ende
d to
the
rest
of th
e A
uton
omou
s C
omm
uniti
es. T
oday
the
neon
atal
scre
enin
g pr
ogra
mm
es c
over
pra
ctic
ally
100
% o
fne
onat
es. T
he r
ecom
men
datio
n is
to o
btai
n bl
ood
from
babi
es b
etw
een
the
5th
and
the
10th
day
of b
irth.
Th
e an
alys
es a
re c
ondu
cted
in a
ny o
f the
20
Clin
ical
and
Mol
ecul
ar G
enet
ics
Labo
rato
ries.
A
nten
atal
scr
eeni
ng is
per
form
ed in
prim
ary
care
se
tting
s or
in h
ospi
tals.
The
gui
delin
es fo
r m
onito
ring
ano
rmal
pre
gnan
cy in
clud
e a
serie
s of
tests
to d
etec
t ce
rtain
pat
holo
gies
, suc
h as
trip
le s
cree
ning
for
Dow
nsy
ndro
me
and
spin
a bi
fida,
the
O’S
ulliv
an te
st fo
rdi
abet
es, v
irus
sero
logy
for
hepa
titis
B, t
ests
for
Stre
ptoc
occu
s
Spain
Tabl
e A
1.2
con
t.
49
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rsc
reen
ing
of th
e at
-risk
pop
ulat
ion
and
calli
ng o
f hig
h-ris
k in
divi
dual
s. T
hepl
an a
lso e
nvis
ages
the
deve
lopm
ent
of a
pro
gram
me
for
prev
entio
n an
dea
rly d
etec
tion
of c
olor
ecta
l can
cer.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rof
regi
onal
scr
eeni
ng p
rogr
amm
e is
still
to b
e ev
alua
ted.
The
prop
osed
scr
eeni
ng p
rogr
amm
e in
clud
es th
ree
type
s of
tests
(rec
tal e
xplo
ratio
n, tr
ansr
ecta
l eco
grap
hy,
and
pros
tate
-spec
ific
antig
en te
st) fo
r in
divi
dual
s ag
ed50
– 69
that
sho
uld
be p
erfo
rmed
eve
ry fi
ve to
ten
year
s.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aag
alac
tiae,
Rh
inco
mpa
tibili
ty, v
irus
sero
logy
for r
ubel
la,
and
sero
logy
for T
oxop
lasm
a go
ndii.
The
trip
le s
cree
ning
(a b
lood
test
that
mea
sure
s al
pha-
feto
prot
ein,
hum
anch
orio
nic
gona
dotro
pin
and
unco
njug
ated
estr
iol)
is
perfo
rmed
on
all p
regn
ant w
omen
. Am
nioc
ente
sis
ishi
ghly
rec
omm
ende
d fo
r w
omen
ove
r 35
.
Spain
con
t.
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rO
rgan
ized
cer
vica
l can
cer
scre
enin
g ha
s be
en
impl
emen
ted
in S
wed
ensi
nce
the
mid
-196
0s.
A m
arke
d de
clin
e in
ce
rvic
al c
ance
r in
cide
nce
coul
d be
attr
ibut
ed to
the
start
of s
cree
ning
.Sq
uam
ous
cell
carc
inom
aha
s de
clin
ed b
y 60
%,
whe
reas
ade
noca
rcin
oma
has
incr
ease
d.
Abo
ut 9
5000
0Pa
pani
cola
ou (P
ap)
smea
rs a
re ta
ken
annu
ally.
Onl
y 31
% o
f the
sm
ears
are
take
n in
the
orga
nize
dsc
reen
ing
prog
ram
me.
A
s of
199
8, th
egu
idel
ines
for
reco
mm
ende
d sc
reen
ing
are:
eve
ry th
ird y
ear,
for
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rM
amm
ogra
phy
scre
enin
g is
car
ried
out f
or e
arly
det
ectio
n of
brea
st ca
ncer
, acc
ordi
ng to
the
Nat
iona
l Gui
delin
es fr
om th
eN
atio
nal B
oard
of H
ealth
and
Wel
fare
, a g
over
nmen
t age
ncy.
Scre
enin
g w
omen
in th
e ag
e gr
oup
40–7
4 w
ith m
amm
ogra
phy
can
redu
ce th
e ris
k of
mor
talit
y fro
m b
reas
t can
cer.
Effe
cts
vary
with
age
and
are
gre
ates
t for
wom
en a
ged
50–6
9. M
edic
alex
amin
atio
n w
ith m
amm
ogra
phy
is r
ecom
men
ded
for
this
age
grou
p th
roug
hout
the
natio
n.Fo
r w
omen
age
d 70
–74
the
effe
cts
are
cons
ider
ed to
be
good
and
an in
crea
sing
dem
and
can
be e
xpec
ted.
The
refo
re, i
t is
cost-
effe
ctiv
e to
offe
r sc
reen
ing
to th
is a
ge g
roup
as
wel
l. D
etai
ls m
ust
be a
djus
ted
to lo
cal c
ondi
tions
.Fo
r w
omen
age
d 40
–49
the
posi
tive
effe
cts
outw
eigh
oth
er
cons
ider
atio
ns, e
ven
if cu
rren
t inf
orm
atio
n is
unc
lear
as
to th
e ris
kof
sid
e-ef
fect
s an
d ov
ertre
atm
ent.
The
low
inci
denc
e of
can
cer
mea
ns th
at th
e ab
solu
te g
ain
is le
ss c
ompa
red
to o
lder
age
grou
ps; t
his
is c
ompe
nsat
ed fo
r by
the
fact
that
you
nger
wom
enha
ve m
ore
life-
year
s to
gai
n. S
cree
ning
with
mam
mog
raph
y is
,th
eref
ore,
rec
omm
ende
d al
so fo
r th
ese
wom
en. T
he fo
rm a
ndsc
ope
shou
ld b
e de
term
ined
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith lo
cal c
ondi
tions
.Ex
amin
atio
n te
chni
que,
pro
ject
ions
and
inte
rval
s sh
ould
be
indi
vidu
ally
ada
pted
to th
e w
oman
’s br
east
tissu
e ch
arac
ter,
curre
nt
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aG
ener
al s
cree
ning
for
PKU
was
intro
duce
d in
Sw
eden
in 1
965.
A b
lood
sam
ple
is ta
ken
from
all
neon
ates
on
the
third
day
afte
r de
liver
y an
d an
alys
ed fo
r ph
enyl
alan
ine.
Eve
n ch
ildre
n bo
rn a
t hom
e or
abr
oad
are
incl
uded
in th
e sc
reen
ing
whe
reve
r po
ssib
le. I
f PKU
is s
uspe
cted
the
defin
itive
dia
gnos
is is
ach
ieve
d by
anal
ysis
of t
he b
lood
leve
l of a
min
o ac
ids
and
the
urin
ele
vel o
f pte
rines
. In
som
e ca
ses
gene
ana
lysi
s is
also
carr
ied
out i
n or
der
to d
etec
t the
gen
e fo
r ph
enyl
ala-
nine
hydr
oxyl
ase.
Scre
enin
g fo
r Dow
n sy
ndro
me:
ultr
asou
nd e
xam
inat
ion
durin
g pr
egna
ncy
was
intro
duce
d ne
arly
25
year
s ag
o.
All
preg
nant
wom
en a
re o
ffere
d on
e ul
traso
und
scan
in th
e se
cond
trim
este
r (g
esta
tiona
l wee
ks 1
5–20
) and
the
offe
r is
acc
epte
d by
97%
of w
omen
. Mid
wiv
es w
ithsp
ecia
l tra
inin
g in
ultr
ason
ogra
phy
usua
lly p
erfo
rm th
eex
amin
atio
n. A
ims
of th
e ro
utin
e ul
traso
und
are
to: e
stim
ate
gesta
tiona
l age
, loc
aliz
e th
e pl
acen
ta, s
cree
n fo
r mul
tiple
preg
nanc
ies
and
dete
ct s
truct
ural
mal
form
atio
ns.
All
preg
nant
wom
en a
re a
lso g
iven
info
rmat
ion
(by
the
mid
wiv
es) o
n th
e po
ssib
ility
of h
avin
g an
am
nioc
ente
sispe
rform
ed in
ord
er to
det
ect c
hrom
osom
al a
bnor
mal
ities
Swed
en
50
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
r23
–50
and
ever
y fif
th y
ear
for
thos
e ag
ed 5
1–60
. H
owev
er, h
ealth
car
e in
Swed
en is
org
aniz
ed b
yau
tono
mou
s co
untie
s an
dth
ere
are
abou
t 30
diffe
rent
regi
onal
aut
onom
ous
cerv
ical
can
cer
scre
enin
gpr
ogra
mm
es in
Sw
eden
.Fo
r ab
out 8
0% o
fSw
eden
, com
pute
rized
files
of o
rgan
ized
and
spon
tane
ous
Pap
smea
rus
age
by e
ach
indi
vidu
alar
e co
llect
ed, b
ut th
ese
files
are
not
com
bine
d to
gene
rate
nat
ionw
ide
data
on s
cree
ning
usa
ge a
ndar
e no
t use
d fo
r lin
kage
with
can
cer
regi
strie
s to
dete
rmin
e w
heth
er th
esc
reen
ing
has
the
desi
red
effe
cts
of r
educ
ing
inci
denc
e of
, and
mor
talit
yfro
m, c
ervi
cal c
ance
r.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rm
edic
atio
n et
c. In
oth
er c
ases
18
mon
ths
for
wom
en u
nder
55
and
24 m
onth
s fo
r w
omen
ove
r 55
is r
ecom
men
ded.
For
high
dia
gnos
tic a
ccur
acy,
dou
ble
chec
king
of m
amm
ogra
ms
is r
ecom
men
ded.
How
ever
, in
the
near
futu
re n
ew e
lect
roni
cde
vice
s m
ay b
e av
aila
ble
to s
uppo
rt th
is p
roce
ss, w
hich
has
to b
ead
juste
d ac
cord
ingl
y.Th
e N
atio
nal H
ealth
Act
sta
tes
that
the
qual
ity o
f hea
lth c
are
shou
ld b
e sy
stem
atic
ally
dev
elop
ed a
nd im
prov
ed fo
r sa
fety
. Th
e N
atio
nal B
oard
of H
ealth
and
Wel
fare
has
issu
ed r
egul
atio
nsan
d ge
nera
l adv
ice
on q
ualit
y as
sura
nce
syste
ms
in h
ealth
car
e.Th
ese
regu
latio
ns a
pply
to s
cree
ning
with
mam
mog
raph
y.In
the
expe
rt re
port
indi
cato
rs a
re d
efin
ed a
nd c
urre
nt th
resh
old
valu
es a
re g
iven
for
qual
ity c
riter
ia.
If a
publ
ic h
ealth
ser
vice
del
egat
es th
e ta
sk o
f im
plem
entin
g a
scre
enin
g pr
ogra
mm
e w
ith m
amm
ogra
phy
to a
sec
onda
rypr
ovid
er, t
he d
eleg
atin
g he
alth
ser
vice
mus
t be
assu
red
that
the
prov
ider
follo
ws
thes
e re
gula
tions
.A
utho
rizat
ion
is r
equi
red
from
the
Nat
iona
l Rad
iatio
n Pr
otec
tion
Insti
tute
(SSI
) for
all
faci
litie
s ut
ilizi
ng io
nizi
ng r
adia
tion.
Ther
e is
no
natio
nal s
cree
ning
pro
gram
me
for
colo
rect
al c
ance
rin
Sw
eden
. The
Nat
iona
l Boa
rd o
f Hea
lth a
nd W
elfa
re a
re c
urre
ntly
wor
king
on
new
gui
delin
es fo
r co
lore
ctal
can
cer,
brea
st ca
ncer
and
canc
er o
f the
pro
state
pla
nned
for
publ
icat
ion
in 2
006.
Faec
al o
ccul
t blo
od te
st, s
igm
oido
scop
y an
d co
lono
scop
y ha
ve a
llbe
en c
onsi
dere
d as
scr
eeni
ng te
sts fo
r co
lore
ctal
can
cer.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
ain
the
fetu
s. F
oeta
l scr
eeni
ng fo
r ch
rom
osom
al
abno
rmal
ities
is p
rimar
ily a
imed
at d
etec
ting
Dow
n sy
ndro
me
(bei
ng th
e m
ost c
omm
on o
ne).
Wom
en a
ged
35 o
r ol
der
are
give
n m
ore
deta
iled
info
rmat
ion
(by
a ph
ysic
ian)
on
this
subj
ect a
nd ro
utin
ely
offe
red
amni
ocen
tesi
s.
Scre
enin
g m
etho
ds a
vaila
ble
on r
eque
st bu
t not
ro
utin
ely
used
are
:•
Firs
t trim
este
r se
rum
scr
eeni
ng w
ith a
naly
sis
ofPA
PP-A
and
β-H
CG
are
bio
chem
ical
met
hods
of
estim
atin
g th
e ris
k of
the
foet
us h
avin
g D
own
synd
rom
e.•
Seco
nd tr
imes
ter
mat
erna
l ser
um a
naly
ses
ofal
pha-
feto
prot
ein
(AFP
), H
CG
and
unc
onju
gate
des
triol
and
inhi
bin-
A le
vels.
Scre
enin
g fo
r sp
ina
bifid
a: T
he S
wed
ish
Regi
stry
ofC
onge
nita
l Mal
form
atio
nsw
as s
tarte
d in
196
4 as
a tr
ial
and
esta
blis
hed
in 1
965.
In 1
999
a sp
ecia
l rep
ortin
gsy
stem
was
sta
rted
to in
clud
e fe
tuse
s w
ith c
onge
nita
lm
alfo
rmat
ions
.The
aim
is to
con
tinuo
usly
follo
w th
ede
velo
pmen
t of s
erio
us c
onge
nita
l mal
form
atio
ns a
ndqu
ickl
y to
det
ect c
hang
es in
the
occu
rren
ce o
f diff
eren
tm
alfo
rmat
ions
. Ser
ious
con
geni
tal m
alfo
rmat
ions
are
repo
rted
with
in s
ix m
onth
s af
ter
birth
. The
re a
re a
bout
1700
rep
orts
a ye
ar.
Swed
en c
ont.
Tabl
e A
1.2
con
t.
51
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rN
atio
nal C
ervi
cal C
ance
r Pr
ogra
mm
e:ce
rvic
al s
cree
ning
is o
ffere
d to
wom
enag
ed 2
5–49
eve
ry th
ree
year
s an
d to
thos
e ag
ed 5
0–64
eve
ry fi
ve y
ears
. It i
sof
fere
d to
thos
e ag
ed 6
5+ o
nly
if th
eyha
ve n
ever
bee
n sc
reen
ed o
r if
they
have
pre
viou
sly h
ad a
sus
pect
res
ult.
The
age
grou
p fo
r ce
rvic
al s
cree
ning
in S
cotla
nd is
21–
60.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rN
atio
nal B
reas
t Can
cer S
cree
ning
Pro
gram
me:
wom
en a
ged
50–7
0 ar
e in
vite
d fo
r m
amm
ogra
phy
ever
y th
ree
year
s.W
omen
ove
r 70
can
be
scre
ened
on
requ
est.
As
a re
sult
of p
ilot s
tudi
es, a
nat
iona
l pro
gram
me
ofsc
reen
ing
by fa
ecal
occ
ult b
lood
test
for
colo
rect
al c
ance
rha
s be
en a
gree
d fo
r m
en a
nd w
omen
age
d 60
–69
ever
ytw
o ye
ars.
Impl
emen
tatio
n is
cur
rent
ly b
eing
pla
nned
and
scr
eeni
ngw
ill b
e in
trodu
ced
in p
hase
s sta
rting
in A
pril
2006
.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aTh
ere
are
rout
ine
neon
atal
blo
odsp
ot s
cree
ning
tests
for
PKU
, CH
, CF
and
sick
le c
ell d
isea
se.
Dow
n sy
ndro
me:
qua
drup
le s
erum
tests
and
ultra
soun
d ar
e ca
rrie
d ou
t in
the
seco
ndtri
mes
ter
of p
regn
ancy
.Sp
ina
bifid
a: u
ltras
ound
scr
eeni
ng ta
kes
plac
e be
twee
n 18
and
20
wee
ks o
f pre
gnan
cyw
ith b
lood
test
if in
dica
ted.
United
Kin
gdom
ANNEXE 2
Screening tables: New Member Statesand Candidate Countries
54
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Tuber
culo
sis
Giv
en th
e in
crea
sing
pre
vale
nce
of c
ases
of
TB in
the
last
10–1
5 ye
ars
(the
TB m
orbi
dity
rate
has
dou
bled
in o
nly
eigh
t yea
rs; f
rom
25.1
in 1
000
0 in
199
0 to
50.
0 in
100
000
in 1
998)
, the
Min
istry
of H
ealth
dev
elop
ed a
Nat
iona
l Pro
gram
me
for
Prev
entio
n, E
arly
Dia
gnos
is a
nd T
reat
men
t of T
uber
culo
sis
(200
0–20
03) i
n 20
00. A
mon
g th
e go
als
ofth
is p
rogr
amm
e is
ear
ly T
B di
agno
sis.
Fluo
rogr
aphi
c ch
eck-
ups
of p
opul
atio
ns a
t ris
k(p
eopl
e liv
ing
in r
egio
ns w
ith T
B m
orbi
dity
rate
s hi
gher
than
the
coun
try a
vera
ge; p
rison
s;ps
ychi
atric
and
com
mun
ity e
stabl
ishm
ents,
etc.
) hav
e be
en in
trodu
ced.
The
pro
gram
me
isal
so c
onsid
erin
g th
e de
velo
pmen
t of a
com
mon
com
pute
rized
sys
tem
for
regi
sterin
g al
l new
TB c
ases
and
the
resu
lts o
f the
ir tre
atm
ent.
The
rela
tive
succ
ess
of th
is p
rogr
amm
e is
ev
iden
t fro
m th
e fa
ct th
at th
e TB
inci
denc
era
te in
Bul
garia
has
dec
lined
slig
htly
ove
r th
ela
st fe
w y
ears
and
rem
aine
d be
low
50
in10
000
0 pe
ople
(48.
8 an
d 47
.8 in
100
000
peop
le in
200
1 an
d 20
02, r
espe
ctiv
ely)
.A
new
Nat
iona
l Tub
ercu
losi
s C
ontro
lPr
ogra
mm
e (2
004–
2006
) has
bee
n in
pla
cesi
nce
2004
. Thi
s ne
w p
rogr
amm
e se
t som
esp
ecifi
c qu
antit
ativ
e ob
ject
ives
(des
crib
edab
ove)
and
is fu
lly fi
nanc
ed b
y th
e N
atio
nal
Hea
lth In
sura
nce
Fund
.
HIV
A N
atio
nal P
rogr
amm
e fo
r Pr
even
tion
and
Con
trol o
f HIV
and
oth
er s
exua
lly tr
ansm
itted
dise
ases
(200
1–20
07) h
as b
een
in p
lace
sin
ce 2
001.
It is
not
opp
ortu
nisti
c. T
he m
ain
obje
ctiv
es, b
road
ly d
efin
ed, o
f thi
s pr
ogra
mm
e ar
e:•
to e
stabl
ish
the
basi
s fo
r a
stead
y pr
oces
s of
era
dica
ting
the
fact
ors
that
con
tribu
teto
the
spre
ad o
f HIV
, pay
ing
spec
ial a
ttent
ion
to th
e vu
lner
able
gro
ups
of th
e po
pula
tion;
•to
ens
ure
a to
lera
nt a
nd s
uppo
rtive
soc
ial e
nviro
nmen
t and
acc
ess
to h
ealth
car
efo
r th
ose
suffe
ring
from
HIV
or
sexu
ally
tran
smitt
ed d
isea
ses;
•to
redu
ce th
e ris
k of
tran
smitt
ing
HIV
and
oth
er b
lood
-bor
ne in
fect
ions
by
intro
duci
nggo
od m
edic
al p
ract
ices
and
sta
ndar
ds a
ccor
ding
to th
e di
rect
ives
of W
HO
and
the
Euro
pean
Cou
ncil.
The
prog
ram
me
is no
t uni
form
thro
ugho
ut th
e co
untry
. Nin
etee
n of
the
27 m
unic
ipal
ities
cont
ain
the
high
est p
erce
ntag
es o
f the
targ
et p
opul
atio
n: 9
0% o
f the
intra
veno
us d
rug
addi
cts;
67%
of t
he p
rosti
tute
s; 5
0% o
f the
gyp
sy m
inor
ity; a
nd 6
7% o
f you
ng p
eopl
e(6
6% o
f tho
se in
sec
onda
ry e
duca
tion
and
82%
of t
hose
in u
nive
rsity
edu
catio
n).
The
prog
ram
me
clas
sifie
s th
e m
unic
ipal
ities
in th
ree
grou
ps:
1.si
x m
unic
ipal
ities
with
hig
her
risk
expo
sure
, whe
re th
e pr
ogra
mm
e co
ver
all f
our
vuln
erab
le g
roup
s in
the
popu
latio
n (in
trave
nous
dru
g ad
dict
s, p
rosti
tute
s, th
egy
psy
min
ority
, and
you
ng p
eopl
e);
2.th
ree
mun
icip
aliti
es w
here
the
prog
ram
me
cove
rs th
ree
of th
e fo
ur v
ulne
rabl
egr
oups
(int
rave
nous
dru
g ad
dict
s, p
rosti
tute
s, a
nd y
oung
peo
ple)
; 3.
ten
mun
icip
aliti
es w
here
the
prog
ram
me
cove
rs o
nly
one
of th
e fo
ur v
ulne
rabl
egr
oups
.Th
e pr
ogra
mm
e is
fina
nced
by
the
Glo
bal F
und
to fi
ght A
IDS,
TB
and
mal
aria
. Th
e fin
anci
al c
ontri
butio
n re
ceiv
ed fr
om th
e Fu
nd a
mou
nts
to U
S$ 6
894
270
for
the
perio
d 20
03–2
005.
How
ever
, mos
t of t
he te
sts fo
r de
tect
ion
of H
IV o
r ot
her
sexu
ally
tran
smitt
ed d
isea
ses
are
paid
dire
ctly
by
the
patie
nts.
The
re is
one
ON
G th
at p
rovi
des
HIV
tests
free
of
char
ge.
Chla
mydia
Chl
amyd
iais
not e
xplic
itly
men
tione
d in
the
abov
e pr
ogra
mm
es.
No
othe
r in
form
atio
n is
avai
labl
e.
Bulg
ari
a
Tabl
e A
2.1
TB,
HIV
, Chl
amyd
ia
55
Tuber
culo
sis
Non
eH
owev
er, n
on-E
U c
itize
ns g
oing
to w
ork
in C
ypru
s fro
m A
sia
(Sri
Lank
a, In
dia,
Pak
ista
n, T
haila
nd, e
tc.)
and
easte
rn E
urop
ear
e te
sted.
In a
dditi
on, a
ll ci
vil s
erva
nts
mus
t hav
e a
ches
t X-ra
y up
on a
ppoi
ntm
ent t
o th
e ci
vil s
ervi
ce. I
n th
e ca
se o
f for
eign
wor
kers
, the
ir po
tent
ial e
mpl
oyer
bea
rs th
e fu
ll co
st, w
hile
for
civi
l ser
vant
s th
e co
st is
cov
ered
by
the
state
.
HIV
Non
eChla
mydia
Non
e
Cypru
s
Tuber
culo
sis
TB is
not
ifiab
le b
y la
w w
ith tw
o lin
ked
syste
ms
– th
e re
giste
r of
tube
rcul
osis
and
a la
bora
tory
not
ifica
tion-
base
d in
form
atio
n sy
stem
for b
acill
ary
tube
rcul
osis.
Any
pat
ient
pre
sent
ing
with
hea
lth p
robl
ems
and
diag
nose
d w
ith T
B ha
s to
be n
otifi
ed. D
ata
are
reta
ined
with
in th
e sy
stem
follo
win
g cl
assi
ficat
ion
rule
s.H
ealth
car
e w
orke
rs in
TB
setti
ngs,
TB
labo
rato
ry p
erso
nnel
, stu
dent
s en
terin
gm
edic
al s
choo
ls an
d pr
isone
rs a
re re
gula
rly s
cree
ned
for T
B (T
ST –
tube
rcul
osis
skin
test)
. BC
G v
acci
natio
n is
obl
igat
ory
and
child
ren
are
scre
ened
by
TST
atag
e 11
. If t
hey
pres
ent a
neg
ativ
e re
sult,
they
are
rev
acci
nate
d. M
igra
nts
inas
ylum
cam
ps a
re s
cree
ned
at e
ntry
with
TST
. The
re is
a li
mite
d pr
ogra
mm
efo
r sc
reen
ing
hom
eles
s pe
ople
, with
ince
ntiv
es (X
-ray
scre
enin
g fo
r ac
tive
TB).
TB s
cree
ning
is p
aid
for
by h
ealth
insu
ranc
e. R
ules
for
TB c
ontro
l req
uire
reca
ll of
pat
ient
s an
d pe
rson
s in
con
tact
with
TB
acco
rdin
g to
spe
cific
rul
es.
Ther
e is
a s
et o
f leg
al in
strum
ents
cont
rolli
ng T
B sc
reen
ing.
HIV
Scre
enin
g fo
r H
IV is
ver
y co
mpl
ex w
ith a
set
of
lega
l ins
trum
ents
cont
rolli
ng H
IV s
cree
ning
.Th
ere
is o
blig
ator
y sc
reen
ing
in c
ases
incl
uded
in s
peci
fic ru
les.
Vol
unta
ry s
cree
ning
is a
cces
sible
for a
nyon
e w
ho w
ants
it (in
cer
tain
circ
umsta
nces
adm
itted
by
law
it c
an b
e an
onym
ous)
.Sc
reen
ing
is c
ompu
lsory
for
dono
rs o
f blo
od,
orga
ns o
r any
bio
logi
cal m
ater
ial,
and
for
preg
nant
wom
en. A
ny s
uch
scre
enin
g is
pai
dfo
r by
hea
lth in
sura
nce.
Som
e fo
reig
n co
untri
esre
quire
HIV
testi
ng b
efor
e en
try a
nd in
suc
hca
ses
the
cost
of th
e te
st is
the
resp
onsi
bilit
y of
the
indi
vidu
al c
once
rned
.
Chla
mydia
Tests
for
Chl
amyd
iaar
edo
ne o
nly
as a
par
t of
the
diag
nosti
c pr
oces
s in
indi
vidu
al c
ases
. The
reis
no
spec
ific
scre
enin
gsc
hem
e.
Cze
ch R
epublic
Tuber
culo
sis
Non
eH
IVH
IV te
sting
is c
ompu
lsory
dur
ing
preg
nanc
y, w
hen
ente
ring
mili
tary
ser
vice
,an
d fo
r pr
ison
ers.
Chla
mydia
Testi
ng fo
r C
hlam
ydia
is c
ompu
lsory
dur
ing
preg
nanc
y.
Esto
nia
56
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Tuber
culo
sis
Scre
enin
g ba
sed
on a
def
ined
pop
ulat
ion
regi
ster
with
a s
yste
m fo
r ta
rget
ing
and
reca
lling
indi
vidu
als
(age
d 18
+, o
n a
year
lyba
sis)
ope
rate
s on
ly fo
r TB
. In
2003
134
fixed
and
48
mob
ile p
ulm
onar
y sc
reen
ing
statio
ns w
ere
oper
atin
g an
d 3
717
518
scre
enin
gs w
ere
carr
ied
out (
43%
of t
head
ult p
opul
atio
n w
ere
scre
ened
).
HIV
Opp
ortu
nisti
c sc
reen
ing
for
HIV
is a
lso a
vaila
ble.
Targ
eted
scr
eeni
ng fo
r H
IV in
fect
ion
is a
sub
prog
ram
me
of th
e N
PHP.
Incr
easi
ng
volu
ntar
y te
sting
bas
ed o
n in
form
ed c
onse
nt a
mon
g hi
gh-ri
sk g
roup
s an
d re
-intro
duci
ngan
onym
ous
HIV
testi
ng c
ombi
ned
with
cou
nsel
ling
are
plan
ned.
Enf
orci
ng th
e le
gally
regu
late
d m
anda
tory
hea
lth e
xam
inat
ion
(incl
udin
g H
IV te
sting
) of s
exua
l wor
kers
isal
so a
mon
g th
e ac
tions
pla
nned
in th
e su
b-pr
ogra
mm
e “P
reve
ntin
g A
IDS”
of t
he N
PHP.
Scre
enin
g te
sts a
re p
aid
for
by th
e N
atio
nal I
nsur
ance
Fun
d (N
IF) i
f the
y ar
e ca
rrie
dou
t in
accr
edite
d in
stitu
tions
.
Chla
mydia
Opp
ortu
nisti
csc
reen
ing
for
Chl
amyd
iais
avai
labl
e.
Hungary
Tabl
e A
2.1
con
t.
Tuber
culo
sis
WH
O T
B co
ntro
l stra
tegy
form
ed th
e ba
sis
for
a N
atio
nal T
uber
culo
sis
Con
trol P
rogr
amm
e ai
med
at d
iagn
osis
, tre
atm
ent a
nd p
reve
ntio
n.TB
dia
gnos
is w
orks
on
two
leve
ls: G
Ps p
rovi
de a
nnua
l exa
min
atio
nsof
thei
r pa
tient
s (p
assi
ve r
ecog
nitio
n); c
heck
-up
of a
ny c
onta
cts
and
patie
nt h
igh-
risk
grou
ps, s
uch
as p
rison
ers
and
imm
igra
nts
(act
ive
reco
gniti
on).
Patie
nt r
ecal
l is
base
d on
the
TB p
atie
nt r
egis
ter
– pa
tient
s ar
eex
amin
ed tw
o ye
ars
afte
r re
cove
ry.
The
Stat
e A
genc
y of
TB
and
Lung
Dise
ases
of L
atvi
a (S
ATLD
) man
age
the
Latv
ian
Nat
iona
l TB
Prog
ram
me,
initi
ated
in 1
995,
bef
ore
the
rest
of th
e fo
rmer
Sov
iet U
nion
follo
win
g th
e W
HO
DO
TS s
trate
gy (D
irect
lyO
bser
ved
Trea
tmen
t Sho
rt-co
urse
). By
199
9, n
early
95%
of t
hepo
pula
tion
was
cov
ered
by
DO
TS w
ith a
72%
cur
e ra
te (W
HO
glo
bal
targ
et o
f 85%
). La
tvia
was
the
only
cou
ntry
in th
e re
gion
per
form
ing
larg
e-sc
ale
treat
men
t of M
DR-
TB p
atie
nts
acco
rdin
g to
WH
O’s
DO
TS-
Plus
stra
tegy
, with
200
–250
pat
ient
s an
nual
ly b
eing
trea
ted
with
dru
gsfu
nded
by
the
Latv
ian
gove
rnm
ent.
The
SATL
D is
a tr
eatm
ent,
teac
hing
and
rese
arch
faci
lity
with
trai
ning
in a
ll as
pect
s of
TB
man
agem
ent
and
cont
rol,
incl
udin
g ro
le o
f PH
C, l
abor
ator
ies
and
surv
eilla
nce.
HIV
Prog
ram
me
for
Limiti
ng th
e Sp
read
of H
IV/A
IDS
in L
atvi
a20
03–2
007
(pre
viou
sly H
IV/A
IDS
spre
ad c
ontro
l stra
tegy
inLa
tvia
199
9–20
03).
Prio
ritie
s ar
e: H
IV p
reve
ntio
n am
ong
inje
ctin
gdr
ug u
sers
; tre
atm
ent a
nd s
uppo
rt fo
r pe
ople
livi
ng w
ith H
IV a
ndA
IDS;
HIV
infe
ctio
n sp
read
con
trol a
mon
g yo
ung
peop
le.
Two
maj
or p
roje
cts
supp
ort t
he c
ontro
l of H
IV in
fect
ion:
co
ordi
nate
d su
ppor
t for
you
ng p
eopl
e’s
heal
th in
Lat
via;
and
un
iform
sec
onda
ry p
reve
ntio
n bu
ildin
g fo
r int
rave
nous
dru
g us
ers.
A
IDS
Prev
entio
n C
entre
: epi
dem
iolo
gica
l mon
itorin
g an
d pr
even
tion
mea
sure
s.Lia
ises
with
the
Euro
pean
AID
S M
onito
ring
Cen
tre a
ndad
here
s to
the
requ
irem
ents
of U
NA
IDS
and
the
Euro
pean
Uni
onan
d is
inte
grat
ed in
to E
uroH
IV p
rogr
amm
e.Ta
rget
gro
ups
for
scre
enin
g:•
HIV
infe
cted
per
sons
and
AID
S pa
tient
s;•
preg
nant
wom
en;
•m
ilita
ry r
ecru
its;
•th
ose
invo
lved
in th
e na
tiona
l arm
ed fo
rces
and
inte
rnat
iona
lpe
ace
mai
nten
ance
.
Chla
mydia
Ther
e is
no
spec
ific
prog
ram
me
for
scre
enin
g of
Chl
amyd
ia.
Latv
ia
57
Tuber
culo
sis
Ther
e is
a n
atio
nal p
olic
y of
sel
ectiv
e te
sts fo
r TB
. Te
sts a
re p
erfo
rmed
on
peop
le w
ith p
rolo
nged
cou
gh
synd
rom
e or
clin
ical
ly s
uspe
ct s
ympt
oms,
usin
g m
icro
scop
ican
alys
is o
f exp
ecto
ratio
n (D
OT
prog
ram
me)
. Te
sts a
re fi
nanc
ed b
y th
e sta
te s
ickn
ess
fund
.
HIV
Ther
e is
a n
atio
nal p
olic
y on
HIV
scr
eeni
ng.
Tests
are
per
form
ed o
n pe
ople
with
clin
ical
AID
Ssy
mpt
oms,
peo
ple
from
hig
h-ris
k gr
oups
and
on
preg
nant
wom
en.
Tests
are
fina
nced
by
the
state
sic
knes
s fu
nd.
Chla
mydia
Ther
e is
no
natio
nal s
cree
ning
pol
icy
for
Chl
amyd
ia. T
ests
are
perfo
rmed
oppo
rtuni
stica
llyac
cord
ing
to c
linic
alsy
mpt
oms
and
are
paid
for
by th
epa
tient
.
Lith
uania
Tuber
culo
sis
In M
alta
, TB
inci
denc
e is
low
bec
ause
of s
cree
ning
, act
ive
surv
eilla
nce
and
cont
rol s
trate
gies
fund
eden
tirel
y by
the
publ
ic h
ealth
car
e sy
stem
. Th
e Sc
hool
Med
ical
Ser
vice
that
form
s pa
rt of
the
Prim
ary
Hea
lth C
are
Dep
artm
ent o
ffers
TB
scre
enin
g w
ith M
anto
ux a
nd B
CG
vac
cina
tion
to a
ll sc
hool
chi
ldre
n at
12–
13 y
ears
of a
ge.
The
Che
st U
nit o
f the
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic H
ealth
scr
eens
ille
gal i
mm
igra
nts
to M
alta
for
TB w
ith a
Man
toux
test.
Obj
ectiv
es a
re to
iden
tify
activ
e TB
dis
ease
at a
n ea
rly s
tage
, to
give
cur
ativ
e tre
atm
ent
and
to p
reve
nt tr
ansm
issi
on o
f dis
ease
.Be
caus
e of
ver
y po
or c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e TB
pre
vent
ive
treat
men
t by
imm
igra
nts,
it is
now
bei
ngof
fere
d to
imm
igra
nt s
choo
lchi
ldre
nan
d to
thos
e im
mig
rant
s w
ith a
bnor
mal
che
st X-
rays
whe
re fi
ndin
gsar
e co
nsist
ent w
ith o
ld T
B. A
ny im
mig
rant
who
wish
es to
be
teste
d fo
r TB
infe
ctio
n an
d of
fere
d pr
even
tive
treat
men
t can
do
so. P
reve
ntiv
e tre
atm
ent i
s of
fere
d an
d ca
n be
ref
used
by
the
patie
nt.
Patie
nts
with
act
ive
tube
rcul
osis
are
giv
en tr
eatm
ent f
ree
of c
harg
e. T
reat
men
t is
supe
rvis
ed d
aily
by
a nu
rse
to m
ake
sure
that
it is
take
n pr
oper
ly a
nd r
egul
arly
(DO
T pr
ogra
mm
e).
HIV
Opp
ortu
nisti
c sc
reen
ing
for
HIV
is o
ffere
d w
ithin
the
publ
ic h
ealth
ser
vice
.It
is u
sual
ly c
arrie
dou
t thr
ough
the
ante
-na
tal o
r gy
naec
olog
ycl
inic
s or
thro
ugh
the
geni
to-u
rinar
y cl
inic
.Pr
e- a
nd p
ost-t
est
coun
selli
ng is
also
give
n as
par
t of t
hese
rvic
e.
Chla
mydia
At p
rese
nt M
alta
does
not
car
ry o
utor
gani
zed
scre
enin
gfo
r C
hlam
ydia
. Sc
reen
ing
is
carr
ied
out o
nly
onsy
mpt
omat
ic c
ases
.A
ll te
sting
is d
one
usin
g PC
R (R
oche
Am
picl
or).
Malta
Tuber
culo
sis
For
over
30
year
s th
e nu
mbe
r of
the
new
TB
case
s in
Pol
and
has
been
dec
reas
ing1
; abo
ut 5
% o
f yea
rlym
orbi
dity
. Dur
ing
1991
–199
3 an
incr
ease
in n
ewin
fect
ions
was
obs
erve
d, s
imila
r to
that
obs
erve
d in
othe
r co
untri
es o
f the
cen
tral a
nd e
aste
rn E
urop
ean
regi
on. I
t is
bein
g ex
plai
ned
by th
e tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
HIV
Hea
lth a
nd s
ocia
l pro
blem
s re
late
d to
HIV
/AID
S ne
cess
itate
d th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent
of a
n in
stitu
tion
at n
atio
nal l
evel
to id
entif
y pr
oble
ms,
pro
pose
sol
utio
ns a
ndco
ordi
nate
diff
eren
t act
iviti
es. S
uch
an in
stitu
tion
was
esta
blis
hed
in 1
992
as a
part
of th
e of
fice
of N
atio
nal S
anita
ry In
spec
tion.
In 2
000,
the
natio
nal o
ffice
sfo
r th
e co
ordi
natio
n of
AID
S pr
even
tion
beca
me
the
Nat
iona
l Cen
tre fo
r A
IDS.
This
insti
tutio
n is
dire
ctly
sub
ordi
nate
to th
e M
inis
try o
f Hea
lth a
nd p
lays
the
Chla
mydia
No
info
rmai
onav
aila
ble
Pola
nd
1O
blig
ator
y va
ccin
atio
n ag
ains
t BC
G w
as in
trodu
ced
In P
olan
d in
195
5
58
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Tuber
culo
sis
cris
is. I
n th
e fir
st pe
riod
of c
hang
es th
ere
appe
ared
a ra
pid
– 20
% to
30%
– d
ecre
ase
in p
rodu
ctio
n an
din
com
e of
the
popu
latio
n, in
crea
se in
mig
ratio
ns a
ndpa
ralle
l HIV
infe
ctio
ns. I
n co
mpa
rison
with
cou
ntrie
sbe
long
ing
to th
e EU
bef
ore
May
200
4, th
ein
cide
nce
of T
B in
Pol
and
is s
till t
wic
e as
hig
h.
In th
e tre
atm
ent o
f TB
in P
olan
d, th
e W
HO
DO
TSstr
ateg
y is
use
d. T
here
is a
spe
cial
cen
tral i
nstit
ute
for
orga
nizi
ng a
nd m
onito
ring
TB tr
eatm
ent –
the
Insti
tute
for T
uber
culo
sis a
nd L
ung
Dise
ases
in W
arsa
w,
with
sev
eral
bra
nche
s el
sew
here
. The
Cen
tral
Regi
ster
of P
eopl
e w
ith T
uber
culo
sis
also
mon
itors
th
e tre
atm
ent o
f pat
ient
s.
HIV
mai
n ro
le in
: sha
ping
the
state
pol
icy
on H
IV/A
IDS
prev
entio
n an
d tre
atm
ent,
anal
ysin
g th
e ep
idem
iolo
gica
l situ
atio
n in
this
field
, and
info
rmat
ion
and
train
ing
activ
ities
. Its
mai
n cu
rren
t tas
k is
coo
rdin
atin
g w
ork
on th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
Nat
iona
l Pro
gram
me
for
HIV
Pre
vent
ion
and
Car
e fo
r Pe
ople
Liv
ing
with
HIV
/AID
S. T
he N
atio
nal C
entre
for
AID
S is
also
the
cont
act p
oint
for
nong
over
nmen
tal o
rgan
izat
ions
(NG
Os)
, whi
ch a
re o
ffere
d su
ppor
t and
fin
anci
al h
elp,
exp
erie
nce,
edu
catio
n, p
rofe
ssio
nal a
dvic
e an
d co
nsul
tatio
n.H
elp
and
supp
ort i
s of
fere
d al
so to
indi
vidu
als
livin
g w
ith H
IV/A
IDS,
to e
nsur
epr
even
tion
and
educ
atio
n in
this
are
a.
Scre
enin
g fo
r HPV
viru
s is
avai
labl
e fo
r wom
en li
ving
with
HIV
. An
HIV
-pos
itive
wom
an h
as th
e sa
me
right
to b
ecom
e a
mot
her
as a
ny o
ther
wom
an.2
If a
wom
an in
this
situ
atio
n co
nsci
ously
dec
ides
to b
ecom
e a
mot
her,
she
is u
nder
the
care
of t
he In
stitu
te o
f Mot
her
and
Chi
ld fo
r th
e w
hole
pre
gnan
cy a
nd h
asan
acc
ess
to a
ntire
trovi
ral (
ARV
) tre
atm
ent f
or v
ertic
al in
fect
ions
. The
re e
xists
api
lot p
rogr
amm
e of
test-
tube
inse
min
atio
n w
ith c
lean
spe
rm.
Chla
mydia
No
info
rmai
onav
aila
ble
Pola
nd c
ont.
Tabl
e A
2.1
con
t.
2N
ow th
e tre
atm
ent i
s pr
ovid
ed to
aro
und
70 c
oupl
es li
ving
with
HIV
who
wou
ld li
ke to
hav
e a
heal
thy
child
.
Tuber
culo
sis
Ther
e is
a m
assi
ve T
B sc
reen
ing
prog
ram
me
in p
lace
. Tho
usan
ds o
f peo
ple
are
scre
ened
by
X-ra
y ex
amin
atio
n: c
hild
ren
ente
ring
kind
erga
rten
and
thei
rpa
rent
s, s
oldi
ers
and
recr
uits,
teac
hers
in s
choo
ls ev
ery
year
, cou
ples
bef
ore
mar
riage
, pris
oner
s. A
ll w
orke
rs in
the
food
indu
stry,
or
thos
e w
ho a
re
hand
ling
food
, nee
d to
hav
e a
year
ly X
-ray
exam
inat
ion
as w
ell a
s al
l new
empl
oyee
s (c
osts
are
born
e by
em
ploy
er in
thes
e ca
ses)
. M
arry
ing
coup
les
and
pare
nts
and
thei
r ki
nder
garte
n ch
ildre
n ha
ve to
cove
r th
e co
st of
the
ches
t X-ra
y th
emse
lves
.
HIV
Testi
ng fo
r H
IV is
vol
unta
ry w
ithth
e gu
aran
tee
of c
onfid
entia
lity.
Pr
egna
nt w
omen
, pat
ient
s w
ithST
Is an
d TB
pat
ient
s ha
ve e
asy
acce
ss to
HIV
testi
ng a
nd
coun
selli
ng.
The
Nat
iona
l Stra
tegy
on
HIV
-A
IDS
2004
–200
7 de
velo
ps
Chla
mydia
Scre
enin
g fo
r C
hlam
ydia
is c
urre
ntly
oppo
rtuni
stic.
The
Nat
iona
l Stra
tegy
for
the
Prev
entio
n an
d C
ontro
l of S
exua
lTr
ansm
itted
Infe
ctio
ns r
ecom
men
dsth
at s
ympt
oms
of C
hlam
ydia
shou
ldbe
trea
ted,
bei
ng c
heap
er th
an th
ela
bora
tory
test.
How
ever
, the
inte
ntio
n
Rom
ania
59
Tuber
culo
sis
The
natio
nal T
B co
ntro
l pro
gram
me
was
intro
duce
d in
200
0. N
ow m
ore
focu
sed
scre
enin
g is
taki
ng p
lace
with
wel
l-def
ined
pop
ulat
ions
, for
exa
mpl
e,et
hnic
com
mun
ities
with
a h
igh
TB in
cide
nce,
pris
oner
s, in
stitu
tiona
lized
peo
ple,
etc.
Thi
s sc
reen
ing
also
incl
udes
spu
tum
sm
ear
bact
erio
logi
cal e
xam
inat
ion.
The
Nat
iona
l Stra
tegy
for
TB c
ontro
lis
chal
leng
ing
the
scre
enin
g pr
ogra
mm
ede
scrib
ed a
bove
as
an in
effe
ctiv
e on
e, r
ecom
men
ding
the
revi
sion
of t
hesc
reen
ing
polic
y.
Cur
rent
ly a
n ev
alua
tion
of th
e pe
riod
2001
–200
5 is
taki
ng p
lace
with
the
supp
ort o
f WH
O a
nd th
e G
loba
l Fun
d to
Fig
ht A
IDS,
Tub
ercu
losis
and
Mal
aria
.
HIV
furth
er th
e in
itiat
ives
from
the
prev
ious
stra
tegy
of 2
000–
2003
and
aim
s to
mak
e H
IV te
sting
and
coun
selli
ng a
vaila
ble
tode
fined
vul
nera
ble
popu
latio
nssu
ch a
s co
mm
erci
al s
ex w
orke
rs,
pris
oner
s, s
treet
chi
ldre
n,
insti
tutio
naliz
ed c
hild
ren,
trav
ellin
gco
mm
uniti
es a
nd s
o on
.
Chla
mydia
is to
intro
duce
a s
cree
ning
stra
tegy
afte
r co
nduc
ting
a pi
lot s
urve
y on
Chl
amyd
iasc
reen
ing
for
wom
enun
der
25 w
ho h
ave
not b
een
preg
nant
and
who
are
at r
isk
ofde
velo
ping
STI
s. T
he r
esul
ts of
the
pilo
t sho
uld
lead
to th
e de
velo
pmen
tof
a c
ost-e
ffect
ive
scre
enin
g str
ateg
y.
Rom
ania
con
t.
Tuber
culo
sis
Slov
akia
has
a n
atio
nal p
olic
y on
scr
eeni
ng fo
r TB
. The
re is
a N
atio
nal T
Bre
giste
r es
tabl
ishe
d in
198
8, to
not
ify a
ll ca
ses.
Targ
et g
roup
s ar
e:•
new
born
bab
ies
• c
hild
ren
at a
ge 6
•im
mig
rant
s•
pris
oner
s•
olde
r pe
ople
livi
ng in
ret
irem
ent h
omes
.A
ll co
sts a
re la
id b
y th
e he
alth
insu
ranc
e co
mpa
nies
.
HIV
Slov
akia
has
a n
atio
nal p
olic
y on
scre
enin
g fo
r H
IV. T
here
is a
Nat
iona
l HIV
reg
iste
r, bu
t the
re is
curr
ently
no
targ
etin
g of
at-r
isk
grou
ps.
All
costs
are
pai
d by
the
heal
th in
sura
nce
com
pani
es.
Chla
mydia
Slov
akia
has
no
natio
nal s
cree
ning
polic
y fo
r C
hlam
ydia
.So
me
phar
mac
eutic
al c
ompa
nies
have
web
site
s w
ith in
form
atio
n an
dad
vice
line
s.
Slova
kia
Tuber
culo
sis
Ther
e is
a n
atio
nal p
olic
y of
scr
eeni
ng fo
r TB
. Vac
cina
tion
of in
fant
sha
s no
w b
een
abol
ishe
d af
ter
a co
ntin
uing
dec
line
in in
cide
nce
over
the
past
few
yea
rs. V
acci
natio
n w
ill o
nly
be d
one
in th
e ca
ses
of c
onta
cts
or h
igh
risk
of e
xpos
ure.
Scr
eeni
ng w
ill c
ontin
ue fo
r ch
ildre
n of
sch
ool a
ge a
t ent
ry a
nd a
t the
end
of p
rimar
y ed
ucat
ion.
Ther
e is
a r
egis
ter,
and
targ
etin
g an
d re
calli
ng p
atie
nts
is p
ossi
ble.
A
ll pr
even
tive,
dia
gnos
tic, t
reat
men
t and
reh
abili
tatio
n se
rvic
esre
late
d to
infe
ctio
us d
isea
ses
are
fully
rei
mbu
rsed
by
the
natio
nal
heal
th in
sura
nce
and
incl
uded
in th
e ba
sic
serv
ices
pac
kage
.
HIV
Ther
e is
a n
atio
nal p
olic
y of
scr
eeni
ng fo
r H
IV. H
IVis
scr
eene
d fo
r ro
utin
ely
in a
ll pr
egna
nt w
omen
, in
all p
atie
nts
with
a n
ewly
esta
blis
hed
diag
nosi
s of
syph
ilis
and
in a
ll th
ose
dona
ting
bloo
d an
d ot
her
tissu
es (b
oth
sinc
e 19
86).
It is
pos
sibl
e to
test
for
HIV
anon
ymou
sly o
r op
enly
at s
ever
al p
oint
s an
d th
ere
is v
olun
tary
incl
usio
n te
sting
for
high
-risk
gro
ups.
Furth
erm
ore,
HIV
testi
ng is
offe
red
upon
info
rmed
cons
ent t
o dr
ug a
ddic
ts in
cen
tres
acro
ss th
e co
untry
.
Chla
mydia
A n
atio
nal p
olic
y of
sc
reen
ing
for
Chl
amyd
iais
unde
r de
velo
pmen
t at t
hem
omen
t. Se
vera
l cro
ss-
sect
iona
l stu
dies
wer
e pe
rform
ed fo
r C
hlam
ydia
inw
omen
and
gui
delin
es fo
rro
utin
e sc
reen
ing
are
bein
gde
velo
ped.
Slove
nia
60
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Tuber
culo
sis
Ther
e is
a na
tiona
l pol
icy
for s
cree
ning
, mon
itorin
g an
d tre
atin
gTB
. The
figh
t aga
inst
TB is
car
ried
out b
y th
e TB
dis
pens
arie
san
d Fi
ght A
gain
st TB
ass
ocia
tions
. The
nat
iona
l pol
icy
is b
ased
on a
def
ined
pop
ulat
ion
whi
ch in
clud
es p
rimar
y sc
hool
chi
ldre
n(b
etw
een
7 an
d 11
yea
rs o
f age
), re
giste
red
sex
wor
kers
(onc
ea
year
), an
d m
en c
ondu
ctin
g th
eir
com
pulso
ry m
ilita
ry s
ervi
ce(2
0–41
yea
rs).
TB s
cree
ning
is a
lso a
pro
cedu
ral r
equi
rem
ent
for
all j
ob a
pplic
atio
ns a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith jo
inin
g an
y of
the
exis
ting
insu
ranc
e sc
hem
es. T
B sc
reen
ings
of p
rimar
y sc
hool
child
ren
and
sex
wor
kers
are
fina
nced
from
the
gove
rnm
ent
budg
et. A
lthou
gh a
ll ot
her
bene
ficia
ries
have
to p
ay fo
r th
ete
st, th
e am
ount
pai
d fo
r th
is s
ervi
ce a
t tub
ercu
losi
sdi
spen
sarie
s is
sym
bolic
.
HIV
In T
urke
y, H
IV te
sts a
re ta
ken
on a
vol
unta
ry b
asis
, and
stri
ct m
easu
res
of c
onfid
entia
lity
are
in p
lace
rega
rdin
g th
e na
mes
of t
he p
erso
ns te
sted,
with
the
exce
ptio
n of
the
follo
win
g gr
oups
, for
who
m th
e H
IV s
cree
ning
is c
ompu
lsory
: blo
od d
onor
s, r
egis
tere
d se
x w
orke
rs (o
nce
in th
ree
mon
ths)
, ille
gal i
mm
igra
nts
sex
wor
kers
, men
con
duct
ing
shor
t-ter
m
mili
tary
ser
vice
, any
pat
ient
s un
derg
oing
a b
lood
test
at p
ublic
hea
lthun
its, p
regn
ant w
omen
und
er p
rena
tal c
are,
pat
ient
s un
derg
oing
su
rger
y.
Som
ewha
t con
trove
rsia
lly, c
oupl
es a
pply
ing
to g
et m
arrie
d ar
e al
sore
quire
d to
take
the
HIV
test;
but
ther
e ar
e no
pro
visi
ons
bann
ing
anH
IV-p
ositi
ve p
erso
n fro
m g
ettin
g m
arrie
d. H
IV s
cree
ning
s of
blo
oddo
nors
and
sex
wor
kers
are
fina
nced
from
the
gove
rnm
ent b
udge
t; al
l oth
er b
enef
icia
ries
have
to p
ay fo
r th
e te
st th
emse
lves
.
Chla
mydia
Onl
y re
giste
red
sex
wor
kers
are
subj
ect t
osc
reen
ing
for
Chl
amyd
ia(ro
utin
e ch
ecks
are
twic
e a
wee
k), a
nd it
isfin
ance
d fro
mth
e go
vern
men
tbu
dget
.
Turk
ey
Tabl
e A
2.1
con
t.
61
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aTh
ere
is a
Nat
iona
l Stra
tegy
for
prop
hyla
xis
of h
ered
itary
dis
ease
s, d
iath
eses
and
cong
enita
l mal
form
atio
ns (2
000–
2005
). Th
e 20
04 b
udge
t for
this
pr
ogra
mm
e w
as 6
86 3
30 le
va (€
350
974)
. The
exi
sting
nat
iona
l neo
nata
l sc
reen
ing
prog
ram
me
is a
mon
g th
e m
ost e
ffici
ent a
nd c
ost-e
ffect
ive
of s
imila
rpr
ogra
mm
es e
xisti
ng w
orld
wid
e. T
he b
asic
def
icie
ncie
s of
the
prog
ram
me
are
of a
n or
gani
zatio
nal n
atur
e an
d ar
e re
late
d to
the
sign
ifica
nt n
umbe
r of
babi
es n
ot e
xam
ined
whi
le s
till i
n m
ater
nity
hos
pita
l. PK
U: a
nat
iona
l neo
nata
l scr
eeni
ng p
rogr
amm
e fo
r con
geni
tal m
alfo
rmat
ions
has
been
in p
lace
sin
ce 1
979.
All
new
born
bab
ies
are
exam
ined
bet
wee
nth
e se
cond
day
and
fifth
day
afte
r bi
rth w
hile
stil
l in
hosp
ital.
If th
e PK
U te
stis
pos
itive
, the
chi
ld is
reg
iste
red,
rec
eive
s sp
ecia
l foo
d an
d co
ntin
uous
med
ical
follo
w-u
p. B
ulga
ria h
as th
e se
cond
low
est i
ncid
ence
rat
e of
PKU
(afte
r Fi
nlan
d): 1
in 3
500
0 ne
onat
es. A
t the
sam
e tim
e, th
e in
cide
nce
rate
of
PKU
in th
e Tu
rkis
h m
inor
ity is
am
ong
the
high
est i
n Eu
rope
: 1 in
700
0ne
onat
es (t
he r
egis
tere
d PK
U in
cide
nce
rate
in T
urke
y is
1:2
000)
. The
PKU
inci
denc
e ra
te a
mon
g th
e Bu
lgar
ian
gyps
ies
is le
ss th
an 1
:100
000,
muc
hlo
wer
than
for
the
Slov
ak g
ypsi
es, f
or e
xam
ple,
whe
re th
e in
cide
nce
is1:
1000
. D
own
synd
rom
e an
d sp
ina
bifid
a: a
nat
iona
l sel
ectiv
e an
tena
tal s
cree
ning
prog
ram
me
is in
pla
ce. A
mni
ocen
tesi
s is
not
obl
igat
ory,
but
is o
ffere
d fre
e of
char
ge to
all
preg
nant
wom
en o
ver
35, t
o w
omen
who
alre
ady
have
a c
hild
suffe
ring
from
con
geni
tal m
alfo
rmat
ion,
or
to th
ose
refe
rred
by
a ge
neal
ogis
t (a
fter
perfo
rmin
g bi
oche
mic
al s
cree
ning
and
det
ectin
g a
high
er r
isk
of fe
tal
mal
form
atio
n). F
or fi
nanc
ial r
easo
ns o
nly
abou
t 5%
of a
ll pr
egna
nt w
omen
inth
e hi
gher
ris
k gr
oup
unde
rgo
amni
ocen
tesi
s.
Bulg
ari
aCer
vica
l ca
nce
rA
Nat
iona
l Stra
tegy
for
prop
hyla
ctic
onc
olog
ical
scre
enin
g (2
001–
2006
)w
as a
ppro
ved
in 2
000.
It
was
initi
ally
fund
ed b
yfo
reig
n N
GO
s. F
orei
gnin
vestm
ent h
elpe
d to
bui
ldup
the
basi
s an
d th
e in
tent
ion
was
that
the
Bulg
aria
n go
vern
men
tw
ould
find
mon
ey to
finan
ce th
e pr
ogra
mm
eits
elf f
rom
200
5.
Giv
en th
e sc
arce
reso
urce
s de
vote
d to
this
strat
egy,
pre
vent
ive
exam
inat
ions
for
cerv
ical
canc
er a
re r
ecom
men
ded
only
as
part
of r
outin
egy
naec
olog
ical
ex
amin
atio
ns.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rSy
stem
atic
bre
ast c
ance
r sc
reen
ing
has
not
been
intro
duce
d ye
t. Th
e ex
amin
atio
ns a
ndan
alys
es to
det
ect c
olon
and
rec
tal c
ance
r ar
epr
ovid
ed to
pat
ient
s at
hig
her
risk
(e.g
. tho
sew
ith r
elat
ives
suf
ferin
g fro
m c
ance
r) an
d ar
efin
ance
d th
roug
h pu
blic
hea
lth in
sura
nce.
Patie
nts,
how
ever
, pay
a fe
e to
vis
it th
e do
ctor
.Th
ere
is a
proj
ect t
o in
trodu
ce m
ore
co-p
aym
ents
in th
e fu
ture
. Th
ere
is a
n A
ssoc
iatio
n fo
r En
dosc
opic
Prev
entio
n fo
r al
l the
pat
ient
s w
ith c
ompl
aint
s,an
d th
eir
rela
tives
. In
spor
adic
cas
es g
enet
icsc
reen
ing
is c
arrie
d ou
t. Bl
ood
sam
ples
are
colle
cted
and
DN
A a
naly
sis
is p
erfo
rmed
on
all p
atie
nts
unde
rgoi
ng s
urge
ry fo
r co
lore
ctal
carc
inom
a. U
sing
this
pro
gram
me,
a n
atio
nal
regi
stry
for
inhe
rited
mut
atio
ns le
adin
g to
co
lore
ctal
car
cino
ma
has
been
cre
ated
.C
linic
ians
follo
w u
p al
l the
pat
ient
s. B
etw
een
2001
and
200
5 a
Swis
s N
GO
cov
ered
all
the
nece
ssar
y ex
pens
es (l
abor
ator
yeq
uipm
ent,
sala
ries
and
all s
ampl
es).
Sinc
eJa
nuar
y 20
05 th
e pa
tient
s pa
y fo
r vi
sits
to th
edo
ctor
, lab
orat
ory
sam
ples
, etc
. The
Ass
ocia
tion
is tr
ying
to r
aise
fund
s fo
r th
e pr
ogra
mm
e.
Tabl
e A
2.2
Cer
vica
l can
cer,
brea
st c
ance
r, co
lore
ctal
can
cer,
PKU
, Dow
n sy
ndro
me
and
spin
a bi
fida
62
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aM
ater
nal a
nd c
hild
hea
lth s
ervi
ces
are
offe
red
free
of c
harg
e to
all
Cyp
riots
thro
ugh
a ne
twor
k of
mat
erna
l and
chi
ld h
ealth
cen
tres.
Am
ong
the
serv
ices
offe
red
are
diag
nosti
c te
sts fo
r in
fant
s an
d ch
ildre
n up
to th
e ag
e of
6, a
s w
ell a
s co
unse
lling
and
con
sulta
tion
serv
ices
to p
regn
ant w
omen
and
new
mot
hers
. Pre
gnan
t wom
enar
e str
ongl
y en
cour
aged
to te
st fo
r th
ese
dise
ases
to m
inim
ize
the
poss
ibili
ty th
at th
eir
child
will
be
born
with
an
abno
rmal
ity. P
KUan
d sp
ina
bifid
a ar
e ra
re in
Cyp
rus.
Dow
n sy
ndro
me
has
decr
ease
d dr
amat
ical
ly to
the
poin
t of e
xtin
ctio
n am
ong
neon
ates
,du
e to
ear
ly d
iagn
osis
and
term
inat
ion
of p
regn
ancy
.
Cypru
sCer
vica
l ca
nce
rTh
ere
is a
nat
iona
l pol
icy
on s
cree
ning
for
cerv
ical
and
bre
ast c
ance
rs b
ased
on
the
popu
latio
n re
giste
r. Th
ere
is a
n in
crea
sed
effo
rt to
info
rm w
omen
of a
ll ag
es o
f the
risks
of s
uch
dise
ases
and
the
role
of
inhe
ritan
ce in
thes
e m
atte
rs. T
he n
atio
nal
polic
y on
scr
eeni
ng fo
r cer
vica
l can
cer c
over
sal
l wom
en a
ged
25–6
5. T
he p
rogr
amm
e is
offe
red
free
of c
harg
e an
d w
ith a
rig
ht o
ffre
e ch
oice
of d
octo
r.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rA
free
-of-c
harg
e sc
reen
ing
prog
ram
me
for
brea
st ca
ncer
has
beg
un o
n a
trial
basis
and
cov
ers
wom
en a
ged
50–6
9.W
omen
are
invi
ted
to p
artic
ipat
e in
the
prog
ram
me
via
a pe
rson
al le
tter
sent
by
the
Min
istry
of H
ealth
. The
parti
cipa
tion
rate
is 4
8% a
nd r
isin
g.Te
sting
for
colo
n an
d re
ctal
can
cer
isth
e re
spon
sibi
lity
of in
divi
dual
s.
PK
U,
Dow
nsy
ndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aTe
sts to
iden
tify
PKU
, Dow
n sy
ndro
me
and
spin
a bi
fida
are
avai
labl
e. T
estin
gfo
r spi
na b
ifida
and
Dow
n sy
ndro
me
ispa
rt of
bas
icsc
reen
ing
durin
gth
e pr
enat
al p
erio
d.Th
e te
sts a
re p
aid
for
from
pub
liche
alth
insu
ranc
e.
Cze
ch R
epublic
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rSc
reen
ing
for
cerv
ical
canc
er (c
ytol
ogic
alan
d m
icro
biol
ogic
alex
amin
atio
n) is
prov
ided
ann
ually
as
a pa
rt of
pre
vent
ive
gyna
ecol
ogic
alex
amin
atio
nfo
r ad
ult
wom
en a
re th
e ta
rget
grou
p. W
omen
are
calle
d or
rec
alle
d by
thei
r gy
naec
olog
ists,
who
are
rei
mbu
rsed
by h
ealth
insu
ranc
efu
nds.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rA
pro
gram
me
of b
reas
t can
cer
scre
enin
g (m
amm
ogra
phy)
is r
ecom
men
ded
for
wom
en a
ged
45–6
9 at
two-
year
inte
rval
s. T
he e
xpen
ses
are
reim
burs
ed to
GPs
by
the
heal
th in
sura
nce
fund
s. W
omen
from
the
targ
etgr
oup
can
be c
alle
d or
rec
alle
d (d
epen
ding
on
thei
r G
P or
gyn
aeco
logi
st) a
nd th
ey c
an r
ecei
ve in
form
atio
nab
out t
his
exam
inat
ion
from
•
thei
r G
Ps
•
leaf
lets
and
mag
azin
es p
ublis
hed
by h
ealth
insu
ranc
e fu
nds
and
NG
Os
•
the
med
ia.
All
adul
t wom
en c
an b
e ex
amin
ed w
ithin
the
fram
ewor
k of
the
prog
ram
me,
but
if th
ey a
re n
ot in
the
targ
et a
ge g
roup
or
high
-risk
gro
up (i
ncid
ence
of b
reas
t can
cer
in th
eir
clos
e fa
mily
, dia
gnos
is o
f gen
etic
mut
atio
n BR
CA
1 an
d BR
CA
2 or
oth
er s
peci
fic r
ecom
men
datio
n), t
hey
have
to p
ay fo
r it.
The
cos
t of t
heex
amin
atio
n is
CZK
200
–300
(ultr
asou
nd) o
r C
ZK 4
00–6
00 (m
amm
ogra
phy)
. C
olon
and
rec
tal c
ance
rN
atio
nal C
olor
ecta
l Can
cer
scre
enin
g pr
ogra
mm
e is
indi
cate
d fo
r as
ympt
omat
ic in
divi
dual
s fro
m th
e ag
eof
50
at tw
o-ye
ar in
terv
als
by F
OBT
. It h
as b
een
incl
uded
as
part
of a
free
-of-c
harg
e pr
even
tive
chec
k-up
sinc
e 20
00. T
he c
osts
are
reim
burs
ed to
GPs
by
the
heal
th in
sura
nce
fund
s.Th
e M
inis
try o
f Hea
lth s
uppo
rted
the
prog
ram
me
with
8
mill
ion
to m
oder
nize
the
endo
scop
ic e
quip
men
tfo
r co
lono
scop
y an
d as
soci
ated
pro
cedu
res.
Indi
vidu
als
in th
e ta
rget
gro
up a
re n
ot c
alle
d (o
r re
calle
d) fo
rth
e ex
amin
atio
n bu
t hav
e to
pre
sent
them
selv
es. T
hey
can
obta
in in
form
atio
n ab
out t
his
test
from
•
thei
r G
Ps
•
leaf
lets
and
mag
azin
es p
ublis
hed
by h
ealth
insu
ranc
e fu
nds
and
NG
Os
•
the
med
ia.
Tabl
e A
2.2
con
t.
63
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aA
ll ne
onat
es in
Esto
nia
are
teste
d fo
r PK
U fr
om b
lood
sam
ples
take
n at
the
hosp
ital b
efor
e di
scha
rge.
G
enet
ic te
sting
is p
art o
f pre
nata
l car
e fo
r pr
egna
nt w
omen
ove
r 37
, and
youn
ger
preg
nant
wom
en w
here
indi
cate
d.Tw
o ul
traso
unds
are
par
t of t
he m
anag
emen
t of a
ll pr
egna
ncie
s.
All
are
paid
by
EHIF.
Esto
nia
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
r, b
reast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rSc
reen
ing
prog
ram
mes
for
cerv
ical
and
bre
ast c
ance
r ar
e fin
ance
d an
dad
min
iste
red
by th
e Es
toni
an H
ealth
Insu
ranc
e Fu
nd (E
HIF
). Bo
th a
re
targ
eted
pro
gram
mes
, with
wom
en in
the
appr
opria
te a
ge g
roup
rec
eivi
ngin
vita
tions
bas
ed o
n th
e EH
IF n
atio
nal d
atab
ase.
Th
e ta
rget
age
gro
up fo
r bre
ast c
ance
r scr
eeni
ng is
45–
59, a
t asc
reen
ing
inte
rval
of t
hree
yea
rs.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aN
ewbo
rn s
cree
ning
is m
anda
tory
for
PKU
.In
the
twel
fth w
eek
of p
regn
ancy
ultr
asou
ndex
amin
atio
n fo
r D
own
synd
rom
e is
car
ried
out.
Gen
etic
scr
eeni
ng fo
r D
own
synd
rom
ean
d sp
ina
bifid
a is
ava
ilabl
e.
Hungary
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rIn
the
“Pub
lic h
ealth
scr
eeni
ngs”
sub
prog
ram
me
of th
eN
PHP
natio
nal p
olic
y on
scr
eeni
ng, b
reas
t, ce
rvic
alan
d co
lore
ctal
can
cers
is d
escr
ibed
in d
etai
l. G
ynae
colo
gica
l cer
vica
l scr
eeni
ng w
as la
unch
ed in
2004
and
is b
ased
on
Papa
nico
lau
cyto
logi
cal t
estin
gof
all
wom
en a
ged
25–6
5, w
hich
, if n
egat
ive,
isre
peat
ed e
very
thre
e ye
ars.
Expe
nses
are
cov
ered
from
the
NIF
bud
get.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rM
amm
ogra
phy
scre
enin
g w
as in
trodu
ced
in20
00 fo
r w
omen
bet
wee
n th
e ag
es o
f 45–
65 a
ndis
rep
eate
d bi
-ann
ually
. The
re is
a g
ood
rate
of
parti
cipa
tion.
Intro
duct
ion
of c
olor
ecta
l can
cer
scre
enin
g fo
rm
en a
nd w
omen
age
d 45
–65
usin
g th
e fa
ecal
occu
lt bl
ood
test
(FO
BT) i
s no
w in
a p
ilot p
hase
.Ex
pens
es a
re c
over
ed fr
om th
e N
IF b
udge
t.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aId
entif
icat
ion
of P
KU is
incl
uded
in th
e ch
ildre
ns’ p
roph
ylac
ticpr
ogra
mm
e: th
ere
is s
cree
ning
(blo
od te
sts) o
f all
neon
ates
in th
e fir
stfo
ur to
five
day
s of
life
, pai
d fo
r fro
m th
e he
alth
car
e bu
dget
.D
own
synd
rom
e te
sting
is p
rovi
ded
for
preg
nant
wom
en, w
ho a
rege
netic
ally
at h
igh
risk,
twic
e (u
p to
wee
ks 1
1 an
d 17
of p
regn
ancy
).H
igh-
risk
grou
ps in
clud
e: w
omen
ove
r 35
; fat
hers
ove
r 45
; whe
reon
e or
bot
h pa
rent
s ha
ve b
een
affe
cted
by
radi
atio
n; w
here
an
acut
e vi
ral i
nfec
tion
has
been
con
tract
ed d
urin
g th
e fir
st tri
mes
ter
ofpr
egna
ncy;
and
oth
er fa
ctor
s.
Latv
iaCer
vica
l ca
nce
rSc
reen
ing
for
canc
er is
incl
uded
in th
epr
ophy
lact
ic p
rogr
amm
e fo
r ad
ults
and
cove
red
in th
e he
alth
car
e bu
dget
.W
omen
age
d 20
–35:
one
onc
olog
ical
test
per
year
. If t
here
is a
neg
ativ
e re
sult,
the
test
is r
epea
ted
thre
e ye
ars
late
r.W
omen
age
d 35
–70s
: onc
olog
ical
test
annu
ally.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rFo
r br
east
canc
er, w
omen
age
d 50
–69
, one
mam
mog
raph
y ev
ery
two
year
s.
For
colo
rect
al c
ance
r, sc
reen
ing
for
men
and
wom
en a
ged
50 y
ears
and
abov
e an
nual
ly.
64
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aA
ll ne
onat
es a
re s
cree
ned
for
PKU
with
a b
lood
test
at 4
8 ho
urs,
paid
for
by th
e C
ompu
lsory
Hea
lth In
sura
nce
Fund
. Dat
a on
di
agno
sed
case
s of
PKU
are
sen
t to
the
Lithu
ania
n H
ealth
Info
rmat
ion
Cen
tre a
nd a
re in
clud
ed in
the
Birth
Reg
istry
. Sc
reen
ing
for
Dow
n sy
ndro
me
is p
erfo
rmed
onl
y if
the
cond
ition
is s
uspe
cted
. Pre
nata
l Dow
n sy
ndro
me
scre
enin
g (“
tripl
e” te
st) is
pe
rform
ed a
t the
Hum
an G
enet
ics
Cen
tre a
nd is
pai
d fo
r by
thos
ein
volv
ed. A
ll pr
egna
nt w
omen
age
d 35
and
ove
r, al
so th
ose
who
prev
ious
ly h
ad b
abie
s w
ith c
onge
nita
l abn
orm
aliti
es, a
nd th
ose
who
wis
h to
be
teste
d ar
e re
ferr
ed to
the
Hum
an G
enet
ics
Cen
tre.
The
“trip
le”
test
is pe
rform
ed d
urin
g w
eeks
14–
15 o
f pre
gnan
cy.
In th
e ca
se o
f abn
orm
al r
esul
ts, th
e di
agno
sis
shou
ld b
e co
nfirm
edby
the
amni
ocen
tesi
s an
d ex
amin
atio
n of
the
gene
tic k
aryo
type
.A
ccor
ding
to L
ithua
nian
law
, abo
rtion
can
onl
y be
car
ried
out
durin
g th
e fir
st 12
wee
ks o
f pre
gnan
cy a
nd D
own
synd
rom
e is
not
cons
ider
ed a
s ju
stify
ing
abor
tion.
Ultr
asou
nd e
xam
inat
ion
of th
ene
ck tr
anslu
cenc
e of
the
fetu
s in
the
11th
wee
k of
ges
tatio
n m
ayin
dica
te D
own
synd
rom
e bu
t thi
s ex
amin
atio
n is
not
per
form
ed o
n a
regu
lar
basi
s.
Ultr
asou
nd s
cree
ning
dur
ing
the
first
sem
este
r of
the
preg
nanc
y is
not
rou
tine.
Rou
tine
ultra
soun
d ex
amin
atio
n is
per
form
ed d
urin
gw
eeks
18–
20 a
nd 3
0–32
of p
regn
ancy
. Cho
rion
biop
sy is
not
use
dfo
r th
e di
agno
sis
of D
own
synd
rom
e –
this
pro
cedu
re is
per
form
edin
the
Hum
an G
enet
ics
Cen
tre d
urin
g th
e fir
st se
mes
ter
of p
regn
ancy
only
for
gene
tic n
ot c
hrom
osom
al a
bnor
mal
ities
. Dat
a on
con
firm
edca
ses
of D
own
synd
rom
e ar
e pa
ssed
to th
e Lit
huan
ian
Hea
lthIn
form
atio
n C
entre
and
are
incl
uded
on
the
Birth
Reg
istry
.Sp
ina
bifid
a ca
n be
iden
tifie
d du
ring
rout
ine
exam
inat
ion
but i
sno
t con
side
red
as a
n in
dica
tion
for
abor
tion
afte
r th
e 12
th w
eek
ofpr
egna
ncy.
Dat
a on
cas
es o
f spi
na b
ifida
are
pas
sed
to th
eLit
huan
ian
Hea
lth In
form
atio
n C
entre
and
are
incl
uded
in th
e Bi
rthRe
gistr
y.
Lith
uania
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rN
atio
nal c
ance
r pr
even
tion
polic
y in
Lithu
ania
is b
ased
on
the
Nat
iona
l Can
cer
Prev
entio
n Pr
ogra
mm
e fo
r 20
03–2
010,
whi
ch w
as a
ppro
ved
by th
e Lit
huan
ian
Gov
ernm
ent o
n 10
Dec
embe
r 20
03.
Sinc
e Ju
ly 2
004
the
Cer
vica
l Can
cer
Prev
entio
n Pr
ogra
mm
e ha
s be
en fi
nanc
edfro
m th
e C
ompu
lsory
Hea
lth In
sura
nce
Fund
. For
pro
gram
me
adm
inis
tratio
n,im
plem
enta
tion
and
surv
eilla
nce,
the
com
pute
rized
dat
abas
e “S
veid
ra”
is u
sed.
The
data
base
con
tain
s lis
ts of
the
popu
latio
nco
vere
d by
com
pulso
ry h
ealth
insu
ranc
ean
d th
e he
alth
car
e se
rvic
es p
rovi
ded.
Th
e pr
ogra
mm
e ta
rget
s w
omen
age
d30
–60
and
scre
enin
g fo
r ce
rvic
al c
ance
r is
per
form
ed o
nce
ever
y th
ree
year
s.D
urin
g th
e se
cond
hal
f of 2
004,
12.7
–17.
1% o
f all
Lithu
ania
n w
omen
age
d30
–60
wer
e in
vite
d fo
r ce
rvic
al c
ance
rsc
reen
ing.
The
cer
vica
l can
cer
scre
enin
g(P
ap te
st) w
as p
erfo
rmed
on
7.2–
10.4
% o
fth
e to
tal t
arge
t pop
ulat
ion;
5.1
–7.5
% o
fth
e ta
rget
pop
ulat
ion
was
info
rmed
abo
utth
e te
st re
sults
.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rIm
plem
enta
tion
of th
e Br
east
Can
cer
Prev
entio
n Pr
ogra
mm
e is
sch
edul
ed to
start
in th
e se
cond
hal
f of 2
005.
Th
e C
ompu
lsory
Hea
lth In
sura
nce
Fund
will
fina
nce
scre
enin
g fo
r br
east
canc
er.
Ther
e is
cur
rent
ly n
o sc
reen
ing
prog
ram
me
for
colo
rect
al c
ance
rfin
ance
d fro
m th
e C
ompu
lsory
Hea
lthIn
sura
nce
Fund
.
Tabl
e A
2.2
con
t.
65
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aM
alta
doe
s no
t hav
e a
scre
enin
g pr
ogra
mm
e fo
rPK
U. T
he te
st is
car
ried
out
if th
e co
nditi
on is
sus
pect
edcl
inic
ally
afte
r bi
rth.
How
ever
, a n
atio
nal r
epor
ton
PKU
cur
rent
ly b
eing
final
ized
is v
ery
likel
y to
reco
mm
end
rout
ine
scre
enin
g fo
r al
l neo
nate
s.
Mal
ta d
oes
not s
cree
nfo
r ch
rom
osom
al d
efec
tsin
clud
ing
Dow
n sy
ndro
me,
unle
ss th
e co
nditi
on is
cl
inic
ally
sus
pect
ed a
tbi
rth. I
t is
then
con
firm
edcy
tolo
gica
lly. D
own
synd
rom
e is
not
scr
eene
dfo
r as
this
is g
ener
ally
asso
ciat
ed w
ith a
te
rmin
atio
n pr
ogra
mm
ean
d te
rmin
atio
n of
pr
egna
ncy
is il
lega
l in
Mal
ta.
Spin
a bi
fida
is o
ften
diag
nose
d at
rou
tine
ante
nata
l ultr
asou
nd.
How
ever
, thi
s co
nditi
on is
som
etim
es o
nly
diag
nose
dcl
inic
ally
afte
r bi
rth.
Malta
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rTh
ere
is n
o na
tiona
l pol
icy
on s
cree
ning
for
cerv
ical
can
cer,
brea
st ca
ncer
or
colo
rect
al c
ance
r.In
the
publ
ic s
ecto
r, sc
reen
ing
for c
ervi
cal
canc
er is
car
ried
out o
n an
opp
ortu
nisti
cba
sis.
Sm
ear
testi
ng is
also
ava
ilabl
e to
all
wom
en w
ho r
eque
st it
by m
akin
g an
appo
intm
ent w
ith th
e gy
naec
olog
y cl
inic
inth
e ar
ea h
ealth
cen
tre. T
he s
ervi
ce is
ver
ypo
pula
r as
dem
onstr
ated
by
the
high
dem
and
and
is p
aid
for
thro
ugh
the
publ
iche
alth
car
e sy
stem
. The
pro
blem
with
this
syste
m is
that
it te
nds
to a
ttrac
t the
“wor
ried
wel
l”. I
n fa
ct, s
ome
loca
l res
earc
hun
der
way
has
, as
expe
cted
, ind
icat
ed th
atm
any
wom
en w
ho d
evel
oped
cer
vica
l ca
ncer
had
not
had
a r
ecen
t sm
ear
test.
How
ever
the
num
bers
wer
e ve
ry s
mal
l. Th
e fa
ct th
at 4
1% o
f wom
en a
ged
20ye
ars
and
over
sta
ted
that
they
had
nev
erha
d a
smea
r te
st in
the
2002
nat
iona
lhe
alth
inte
rvie
w s
urve
y is
also
a c
ause
for
conc
ern.
In th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
, a la
rge
num
ber
ofw
omen
(no
statis
tics
avai
labl
e) u
nder
gosm
ear t
estin
g re
gula
rly. G
ener
al p
ract
ition
ers
or g
ynae
colo
gists
pro
vide
this
ser
vice
.So
me
of th
e be
tter
orga
nize
d cl
inic
s ha
vede
velo
ped
thei
r ow
n ca
ll an
d re
call
syste
mfo
r th
e pa
tient
s w
ho u
se th
eir
serv
ices
and
offe
r th
e se
rvic
e on
a y
early
bas
is. T
his
is
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rBr
east
canc
er is
the
mos
t com
mon
cau
se o
f can
cer m
orta
lity
in w
omen
.Sc
reen
ing
for b
reas
t can
cer h
as b
een
a ho
tly d
ebat
ed to
pic
in re
cent
yea
rs.
A fe
w y
ears
ago
, the
Min
istry
of H
ealth
set
up
a co
mm
ittee
, the
Nat
iona
lA
dviso
ry C
omm
ittee
on
Brea
st Sc
reen
ing
to re
port
on th
e fe
asib
ility
of i
ntro
duci
ngbr
east
canc
er s
cree
ning
in th
e pu
blic
hea
lth s
ervi
ce. A
t the
tim
e th
e co
mm
ittee
had
conc
lude
d th
at it
was
not
feas
ible
but
it re
com
men
ded
thre
e im
med
iate
tom
ediu
m-te
rm m
easu
res
whi
ch w
ere:
•to
impr
ove
upon
the
then
cur
rent
dia
gnos
tic a
nd th
erap
eutic
ser
vice
s;•
to in
trodu
ce s
ervi
ces
for w
omen
at h
ighe
r risk
;•
to a
ddre
ss th
e ge
nera
l fem
ale
popu
latio
n.It
was
sub
mitt
ed in
Mar
ch 2
000.
With
in th
e pu
blic
hea
lth s
ecto
r, br
east
scre
enin
g, in
the
form
of c
linic
al a
ndm
amm
ogra
phic
exa
min
atio
n, is
cur
rent
ly o
ffere
d to
wom
en re
ferre
d fro
m p
rimar
yca
re w
ho a
re c
onsid
ered
as
bein
g at
a s
ubsta
ntia
lly in
crea
sed
risk.
Th
e fo
llow
ing
cate
gorie
s ar
e in
clud
ed u
nder
incr
ease
d ris
k: w
omen
who
hav
eal
read
y ha
d un
ilate
ral b
reas
t can
cer o
r ova
rian
canc
er; w
omen
who
hav
e ha
dpr
olife
rativ
e or
aty
pica
l hyp
erpl
asic
bre
ast d
iseas
e; w
omen
who
hav
e a
first-
degr
ee re
lativ
e w
ith b
reas
t can
cer a
t any
age
; wom
en re
ceiv
ing
horm
one
repl
acem
ent t
hera
py.
Ther
e is
no s
peci
fic p
olic
y an
d th
ere
may
be
som
e va
riabi
lity
amon
g di
ffere
ntsu
rgeo
ns. T
his
scre
enin
g is
offe
red
free
of c
harg
e si
nce
it fo
rms
part
of th
ena
tiona
lhea
lth s
ervi
ce.
In th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
, wom
en s
eek
mam
mog
raph
y sc
reen
ing
on th
eir o
wn
initi
ativ
e al
thou
gh o
ppor
tuni
stic
scre
enin
g is
wid
ely
prac
tised
. Sin
ce th
ere
is no
natio
nal p
olic
y, s
ome
clin
ics
have
set
up
thei
r ow
n ca
ll an
d re
call
syste
ms
with
mos
t clin
ics
reca
lling
wom
en o
n a
year
ly b
asis.
Thi
s is
norm
ally
pai
d fo
r out
of
pock
et b
y th
e se
rvic
e us
ers.
C
olor
ecta
l can
cer i
s th
e se
cond
mos
t com
mon
cau
se o
f can
cer-r
elat
ed d
eath
in
bot
h m
en a
nd w
omen
in M
alta
. In
the
publ
ic s
ecto
r, sc
reen
ing
for c
olor
ecta
lca
ncer
is o
ffere
d to
firs
t-deg
ree
rela
tives
of p
atie
nts
with
fam
ilial
pol
ypos
is.
In s
uch
insta
nces
pat
ient
s ar
e ad
vise
d to
info
rm th
eir r
elat
ives
of t
heir
incr
ease
d
66
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
Malta c
ont.
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rno
rmal
ly p
aid
for
by th
e se
rvic
e us
ers.
Even
per
sons
cov
ered
by
a pr
ivat
e he
alth
insu
ranc
e m
ay h
ave
to p
ay o
ut o
f poc
ket
sinc
e m
ost s
chem
es a
vaila
ble
loca
llyex
clud
e pr
even
tive
care
and
scr
eeni
ng.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rris
k an
d to
adv
ise th
em to
pre
sent
for s
cree
ning
. Suc
h sc
reen
ing
is of
fere
d fre
e of
cha
rge
since
it fo
rms
part
of th
e na
tiona
l hea
lth s
ervi
ce. I
nfor
mat
ion
on th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
is n
ot a
vaila
ble
but a
necd
otal
evi
denc
e su
gges
ts th
at th
is ty
pe o
fsc
reen
ing
has
not r
eally
bee
n ta
ken
up in
Mal
ta to
the
sam
e ex
tent
as
mam
mog
raph
y or
sm
ear t
ests.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aIn
form
atio
n no
t ava
ilabl
e
Pola
nd
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rIn
form
atio
n no
t ava
ilabl
eBre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rIn
form
atio
n no
t ava
ilabl
e
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aSi
nce
2003
the
Min
istry
of H
ealth
has
def
ined
with
in it
s na
tiona
l hea
lth s
trate
gy a
spec
ial p
rogr
amm
e on
“pr
even
tion
of g
enet
ic s
yndr
omes
”. T
he p
rogr
amm
e is
aco
mpo
nent
(int
erve
ntio
n) o
f the
Nat
iona
l Pro
gram
me
for
Mot
her
and
Chi
ld H
ealth
that
aim
s to
red
uce
infa
nt a
nd m
ater
nal m
orta
lity.
It h
as tw
o m
ain
obje
ctiv
es: t
oor
gani
ze a
net
wor
k of
ant
e- a
nd p
ostn
atal
dia
gnos
is c
entre
s an
d to
pre
vent
gene
tic s
yndr
omes
. The
sys
tem
is d
esig
ned
on th
ree
leve
ls:1.
fam
ily d
octo
rs a
nd o
ther
firs
t-leve
l prim
ary
care
pro
fess
iona
ls w
here
risk
fact
ors
and
popu
latio
ns a
t risk
can
be
iden
tifie
d an
d co
unse
lling
can
be m
ade
avai
labl
e;2.
distr
ict h
ospi
tals
whe
re u
ltras
ound
and
gen
etic
tests
are
per
form
ed;
3.re
prod
uctiv
e he
alth
ref
eren
ce c
entre
s w
here
full
pack
ages
of i
nves
tigat
ions
are
avai
labl
e.Th
e pr
ojec
t des
crib
es d
etai
led
prot
ocol
s fo
r ea
ch le
vel a
s w
ell a
s th
e m
inim
umne
cess
ary
tech
nica
l equ
ipm
ent a
nd tr
aini
ng.
The
prog
ram
me
starte
d w
ith le
vel 3
– th
e “r
epro
duct
ive
heal
th r
efer
ence
cent
res”
– b
y ac
hiev
ing
the
nece
ssar
y eq
uipm
ent a
nd tr
aini
ng. F
utur
e ste
ps w
illfo
cus
on c
asca
de tr
aini
ng o
f lev
els
1 an
d 2.
The
who
le p
rogr
amm
e is
coo
rdin
ated
by th
e In
stitu
te o
f Mot
her
and
Chi
ld C
are.
PKU
scr
eeni
ng is
per
form
ed o
n ov
er60
% o
f neo
nate
s. T
he in
tent
ion
is to
ext
end
cove
rage
to 1
00%
.
Rom
ania
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rTu
mou
rs a
re th
e se
cond
mos
tco
mm
on c
ause
of d
eath
inRo
man
ia. C
ervi
cal c
ance
rin
cide
nce
is th
e th
ird h
ighe
st in
Euro
pe a
nd to
p in
term
s of
mor
talit
y. T
he N
atio
nal P
ublic
Hea
lth S
trate
gy r
ecom
men
ds a
resh
apin
g of
the
natio
nal
canc
er r
egis
try b
y 20
06 a
ndth
e im
plem
enta
tion
of a
natio
nal p
rogr
amm
e on
scre
enin
g. A
t the
mom
ent,
scre
enin
g is
opp
ortu
nisti
c an
dpa
id fo
r fro
m th
e he
alth
insu
ranc
e fu
nd a
nd th
e M
inis
tryof
Hea
lth’s
budg
et th
roug
h th
ena
tiona
l pro
gram
me
onre
prod
uctiv
e he
alth
.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rBr
east
canc
er is
res
pons
ible
for
17%
of d
eath
s, a
s is
col
orec
tal c
ance
r.
Tabl
e A
2.2
con
t.
67
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aSl
ovak
ia h
as a
n an
tena
tal s
cree
ning
pro
gram
me
and
all p
regn
ant w
omen
und
ergo
ultr
asou
ndex
amin
atio
n to
iden
tify
Dow
n sy
ndro
me
and
spin
a bi
fida.
All
neon
ates
are
exa
min
ed to
id
entif
y PK
U b
y bi
oche
mic
al m
etho
ds.
Cos
ts ar
e co
vere
d by
hea
lth in
sura
nce.
Solv
ak
iaCer
vica
l ca
nce
rSl
ovak
ia h
as a
nat
iona
l pol
icy
on s
cree
ning
. Fo
r ce
rvic
al c
ance
r, sc
reen
ing
is o
ppor
tuni
stic
and
costs
are
cove
red
by h
ealth
insu
ranc
eco
mpa
nies
.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rFo
r br
east
canc
er, w
omen
age
d 40
–60
are
targ
eted
for
perio
dic
mam
mog
raph
y, a
nd th
e co
sts a
re c
over
ed b
y he
alth
insu
ranc
e co
mpa
nies
. W
ith r
egar
d to
col
orec
tal c
ance
r, m
en a
nd w
omen
ove
r th
e ag
eof
50,
thos
e w
ith a
fam
ily h
isto
ry a
nd p
atie
nts
with
exi
sting
col
ondi
seas
e ar
e ta
rget
ed a
nd o
nce
agai
n co
sts a
re c
over
ed b
y he
alth
insu
ranc
e co
mpa
nies
.
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aPK
U is
scr
eene
d fo
r in
the
first
days
afte
rbi
rth a
nd it
is a
pplie
d un
iver
sally
– a
ll ne
onat
es a
re s
cree
ned.
D
own
synd
rom
e an
d sp
ina
bifid
a ar
eid
entif
ied
thro
ugh
asse
ssm
ent o
f risk
(bas
edon
nat
iona
l rec
omm
ende
d gu
idel
ines
) and
thro
ugh
ultra
soun
d te
sting
.
Slove
nia
Cer
vica
l ca
nce
rTh
ere
is a
nat
iona
l pol
icy
on s
cree
ning
for
cerv
ical
canc
er. T
he p
roje
ct ‘Z
ORA
’ inc
lude
s al
l wom
enbe
twee
n th
e ag
es o
f 25
and
64. T
hey
are
activ
ely
follo
wed
up
thro
ugh
a ce
ntra
l sur
veill
ance
sys
tem
,w
hich
iden
tifie
s th
e fre
quen
cies
of c
ervi
cal s
mea
rs.
Thes
e ar
e pe
rform
ed e
very
thre
e ye
ars
(afte
r th
efir
st tw
o, ta
ken
in th
e sp
an o
f six
mon
ths,
hav
e bo
thpr
oved
neg
ativ
e). N
on-re
spon
ders
can
be
trace
dby
two
syste
ms;
one
is th
roug
h th
e pr
ojec
t, w
hich
invi
tes
them
aga
in a
fter
six
mon
ths,
or
thro
ugh
the
prim
ary
care
gyn
aeco
logi
sts w
ho h
ave
a du
ty to
perfo
rm te
sts tr
ienn
ially
. In
both
sys
tem
s, th
e te
st is
eith
er c
ompl
etel
y fre
e of
cha
rge
or in
volv
es c
o-pa
ymen
ts. T
he o
nly
exce
ptio
n is
a te
st pe
rform
edon
req
uest
by a
pat
ient
, with
no
path
olog
y, s
oone
rth
an th
ree
year
s af
ter
the
prev
ious
one
.
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rBr
east
canc
er is
cur
rent
ly s
cree
ned
for
oppo
rtuni
stica
lly,
thro
ugh
the
netw
ork
of c
entre
s fo
r br
east
dise
ases
.Th
ere
is n
o na
tiona
l pol
icy
alth
ough
the
Nat
iona
lC
ance
r In
stitu
te is
tryi
ng to
hav
e th
e sta
ndar
d Eu
rope
angu
idel
ines
ado
pted
in S
love
nia.
How
ever
, nat
iona
lgu
idel
ines
hav
e be
en p
repa
red
and
are
awai
ting
appr
oval
by
the
natio
nal a
utho
ritie
s re
spon
sibl
e.
The
goal
is fo
r th
e en
tire
proc
ess
of s
cree
ning
to b
efin
ance
d by
nat
iona
l hea
lth in
sura
nce.
Col
on c
ance
r is
a r
apid
ly in
crea
sing
pro
blem
inSl
oven
ia. T
his
has
led
to th
e pr
epar
atio
n of
nat
iona
lgu
idel
ines
, whi
ch a
re r
eady
, and
an
asse
ssm
ent i
s to
be p
erfo
rmed
this
yea
r on
thei
r fe
asib
ility
in p
ract
ice.
Afte
r th
at, f
undi
ng fr
om n
atio
nal h
ealth
insu
ranc
e w
ill b
e so
ught
to fi
nanc
e th
is a
dditi
onal
scr
eeni
ng
prog
ram
me.
68
Scre
enin
g in E
uro
pe
– a p
olic
y s
um
mary
PK
U,
Dow
n s
yndro
me,
spin
a b
ifid
aA
mni
ocen
tesi
s is
use
d to
iden
tify
gene
ticbi
rth d
efec
ts. In
Tur
key
amni
ocen
tesi
s is
pe
rform
ed o
n th
e ba
sis
of a
phy
sici
an’s
reco
mm
enda
tion
and
ther
e is
cur
rent
ly n
ona
tiona
l pol
icy.
Turk
eyCer
vica
l ca
nce
rIn
rec
ent y
ears
, a n
atio
nal c
ance
r sc
reen
ing
polic
y ha
s be
en d
evel
oped
,an
d a
decr
ee h
as b
een
publ
ishe
d fo
r th
ees
tabl
ishm
ent o
f “ca
ncer
scr
eeni
ng
cent
res”
und
er th
e au
spic
es o
f pub
lic
hosp
itals.
The
se c
entre
s ar
e en
truste
dw
ith th
e ta
sk o
f adm
inis
terin
g at
leas
t one
scre
enin
g pr
ogra
mm
e ta
rget
ed a
t ris
kgr
oups
(for
bre
ast c
ance
r in
wom
en a
ged
40 a
nd o
lder
and
for l
ung
canc
er in
men
).
Bre
ast
cance
r, c
olo
rect
al ca
nce
rSo
me
pilo
t scr
eeni
ng p
rogr
amm
es a
re a
lread
y ru
nnin
g, o
ne o
fw
hich
is b
eing
con
duct
ed in
Izm
ir. In
the
fram
ewor
k of
this
parti
cula
r pi
lot,
the
heal
th c
are
pers
onne
l fro
m th
e sc
reen
ing
cent
res
visi
t dis
trict
s in
the
city
, and
scr
een
wom
en o
ver
the
age
of 4
0 fo
r bre
ast c
ance
r. Th
is sc
reen
ing
incl
udes
exa
min
atio
nby
the
phys
icia
n, u
ltras
ound
and
mam
mog
raph
y w
hene
ver
nece
ssar
y. B
esid
es th
ese
publ
icly
adm
inist
ered
scr
eeni
ng p
roje
cts,
som
e m
unic
ipal
ities
and
NG
Os
also
org
aniz
e sc
reen
ing
prog
ram
mes
on
thei
r ow
n, m
ainl
y ta
rget
ed a
t bre
ast c
ance
r. A
ll th
ese
scre
enin
gs a
re fr
ee o
f cha
rge.
Tabl
e A
2.2
con
t.
The European Observatory on HealthSystems and Policies supports and
promotes evidence-based health policy-makingthrough comprehensive and rigorous analysis ofhealth care systems in Europe. It brings togethera wide range of policy-makers, academics andpractitioners to analyse trends in health carereform, drawing on experience from acrossEurope to illuminate policy issues.
The European Observatory on Health Systemsand Policies is a partnership between the WHORegional Office for Europe, the Governments ofBelgium, Finland, Greece, Norway, Spain andSweden, the Veneto Region of Italy, the EuropeanInvestment Bank, the Open Society Institute, theWorld Bank, CRP-Santé Luxembourg, the LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science and theLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
More information on the European Observatory’scountry monitoring, policy analyses and publications (including the policy briefs) can befound on its website at: http://www.euro.who.int/observatory
WHO European Centre for HealthPolicyRue de l’Autonomie 41070 BrusselsBelgium
Please address requests aboutpublications to:PublicationsWHO Regional Office for EuropeScherfigsvej 8DK-2100 Copenhagen ØDenmark
for copies of publications:[email protected]
for permission to reproduce them:[email protected]
for permission to translate them:[email protected]
The
Euro
pea
n O
bse
rvat
ory
on H
ealt
h Sy
stem
s an
d P
olic
ies
is a
par
tner
ship
bet
wee
n th
e W
HO
Reg
iona
l Off
ice
for E
urop
e, th
eG
over
nmen
ts o
f Bel
gium
, Fin
land
, Gre
ece,
Nor
way
, Sp
ain
and
Sw
eden
, the
Ven
eto
Reg
ion
of It
aly,
the
Euro
pea
n In
vest
men
t Ban
k, th
eO
pen
Soc
iety
Inst
itut
e, th
e W
orld
Ban
k, C
RP-
Sant
é Lu
xem
bou
rg, t
he L
ond
on S
choo
l of E
cono
mic
s an
d P
olit
ical
Sci
ence
and
the
Lond
onSc
hool
of H
ygie
ne &
Tro
pic
al M
edic
ine.
This
pol
icy
bri
ef is
inte
nded
for p
olic
y-m
aker
s an
d th
ose
add
ress
ing
the
issu
e of
scr
eeni
ng in
hea
lth
care
.