POL311: Political Psychology

27
Professor Lerman T/TH 10-10:50 POL311: Political Psychology

Transcript of POL311: Political Psychology

Page 1: POL311: Political Psychology

Professor Lerman

T/TH 10-10:50

POL311: Political Psychology

Page 2: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience to Authority, Mass Atrocities

and Genocide

John Palmer

Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs

22 April 2010

Page 3: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience: The Case of Adolf Eichmann

SS-Obersturmbannführer Eichmann during

Nazi period.

Eichmann on trial in Jerusalem, 1961.

Page 4: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience: The Case of Adolf Eichmann

Why did Eichmann oversee the expulsion of millions of men,

women and children to Nazi extermination camps?

Material self-interest?

Prejudice?

Aggression?

Conformity?

Obedience?

Page 5: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 6: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience: Milgram experiment

The mild-mannered, likeable gentleman

Page 7: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

The mild-mannered, likeable gentleman gets strapped into the “electric chair”

Page 8: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 9: POL311: Political Psychology

Would you disobey? At what shock level?

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 10: POL311: Political Psychology

How did Milgram’s subjects respond?

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 11: POL311: Political Psychology

Regular voice-feedback experiment:

(subject can hear learner protesting and screaming in separate room)

Mean stopping point: 405 volts

65% went all the way to the end

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 12: POL311: Political Psychology

Subject’s choice:

(subject gets to choose shock level)

Mean stopping point: 75-90 volts

2.5% (one person) went all the way to the

end

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 13: POL311: Political Psychology

Proximity of victim:

(subject and learner in same room)

Mean stopping point: 300-315 volts

40% went all the way to the end

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 14: POL311: Political Psychology

Touch proximity:

(subject and learner in same room; subject must force learner’s hand

onto shock plate)

Mean stopping point: 255-270 volts

30% went all the way to the end

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 15: POL311: Political Psychology

Absent experimenter:

(experimenter leaves lab and gives directions by telephone)

Mean stopping point: 270-280 volts

18.15% went all the way to the end

Some subjects started “cheating”

(telling experimenter they were raising

shocks when in fact they were keeping

them at lowest level)

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 16: POL311: Political Psychology

Ordinary man giving orders:

(experimenter leaves lab and hands his role to a confederate posing

as another volunteer)

Mean stopping point: 240-255 volts

20% went all the way to the end

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 17: POL311: Political Psychology

Authority as victim; ordinary man giving orders:

(lab technician is receiving the shocks, a confederate posing as

another volunteer is giving the orders)

Mean stopping point: 150 volts

No one goes past 150 volts

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 18: POL311: Political Psychology

Authority as victim; authority giving orders:

(one lab technician is receiving the shocks, another lab technician is

giving the orders)

Mean stopping point: 345-360 volts

65% went all the way to the end

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 19: POL311: Political Psychology

Two authorities; contradictory orders:

(one lab technician says shock, the other says don’t shock)

Mean stopping point: 150 volts

None went past 165 volts

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Page 20: POL311: Political Psychology

Theory of obedience and disobedience:

Obedience: Milgram Experiment

Agentic

state

Antecedent

conditions

Resolution of strain

(r)Strain (s)Consequences

Binding factors (B)

Obedience: B>(s-r)

Disobedience: B<(s-r)

Page 21: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience: Stanford Prison Experiment

Page 22: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience: Abu Ghraib

U.S. treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib

prison, Iraq.

Page 23: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience: Bagram

A sketch by Thomas V. Curtis, a Reserve

M.P. sergeant, showing how Dilawar was

chained to the ceiling of his cell.

From -- Tim Golden, ”In U.S.

Report, Brutal Details of 2

Afghan Inmates' Deaths.” The

New York Times, May 20, 2005.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05

/20/international/asia/20abuse.h

tml

Page 24: POL311: Political Psychology

Obedience: Guantanamo

U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

Page 25: POL311: Political Psychology

Genocide

Buchenwald

concentration

camp, Germany,

April 16, 1945.

Page 26: POL311: Political Psychology

Genocide

Remains of the victims of the Rwanda genocide of 1994.

Page 27: POL311: Political Psychology

Genocide

Remains of Srebrenica victims, Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1995.