pnrp.gw.govt.nzpnrp.gw.govt.nz/.../Table-of-Decisions-Topic-Discharges-to-Land.do… · Web...
Transcript of pnrp.gw.govt.nzpnrp.gw.govt.nz/.../Table-of-Decisions-Topic-Discharges-to-Land.do… · Web...
Topic – Discharges to Land
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S12/006 Neville Fisher Silage Amend Amend definition so that 'high-moisture' is defined as above 75% moisture content.
Reject
/S12/007 Neville Fisher 2.2 Definitions Amend Add definition for 'silage storage area'. [Relevant to Rule R90] Reject
/S12/008 Neville Fisher 2.2 Definitions Amend Add definition for 'ponding', particularly in relation to animal
effluent, and define 'ponding' as: areas of ponded effluent on the groundsurface greater than 10m2 for a period greater than 12 hours or runoff (visibleoverland flow). [Relevant to Policy P94 and Rule R83]
Reject
/S12/009 Neville Fisher Policy P94:
Discharge of collected animal effluent
Amend Add definition for 'ponding', and define 'ponding' as: areas of ponded effluent on the ground surface greater than 10m2 for a period greater than 12 hours or runoff (visible overland flow).
Reject
/S12/010 Neville Fisher Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Add definition for 'ponding', and define 'ponding' as: areas of ponded effluent on the ground surface greater than 10m2 for a period greater than 12 hours or runoff (visible overland flow).
Reject
/S12/014 Neville Fisher Rule R83:
Discharge of Amend Add definition of ponding for R83(f). Ponding defined as: areas of
ponded effluent on the groundReject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 1 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
surface greater than 10m2 for a period greater than 12 hours or runoff (visibleoverland flow)
/S12/015 Neville Fisher Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose in part
Include the limits that are being used, particularly for matters of control 2 and 3 (maximum herd size and nutrient loading rates).
Reject
/S12/016 Neville Fisher Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose in part
Split Rule R90 to make separate rules for silage and compost. Reject
/S12/017 Neville Fisher Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Delete Rule R90(b) [relating to hazardous substances, wastewater, offal and dead animal matter] from the silage rule.
Reject
/S12/018 Neville Fisher Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose in part
Replace wording of Rule R83(g) as follows:
(g) the entire extent ofeffluent storage and treatment facilities (including sumps and ponds) must besealed so as to restrict seepage of effluent where all or any part of thestorage facility (including weeping walls, stone traps, sumps and ponds) isestablished or extended (including deepening) from the date the Plan is madeoperative. The permeability of thesealing layer must not exceed 1x10-9m/s subject to the following exceptions:
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 2 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
(i) Where there are multiple ponds that make up the storagefacility, but not all are being extended then only those that are beingextended are required to be fully sealed, or ...
FS68/004 Tim Mansell and family Support AllowS12/019 Neville Fisher Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose A collaboratively produced section 32 analysis of theeconomic benefit of storage is carried out before farmers are forced to spend$150,000 plus on storage.
Reject
/S12/020 Neville Fisher Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose in part
Delete Rule R90 or more consultation with the rural sector aboutwhat is being attempted to be achieved with this rule.
Reject
/S12/021 Neville Fisher Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Define 'silage storage area'. [see sub point S12/007] Reject
/S12/034 Neville Fisher Policy P94:
Discharge of collected animal effluent
Amend Move P94 to Section 4.8.8 [discharges to land policies]. Accept
/S12/035 Neville Fisher Policy P94:
Discharge of collected animal effluent
Amend Delete P94 (b) (iv). Accept
/S12/036 Neville Fisher Policy P94: Amend Define 'ponding' as: areas of ponded effluent on the ground Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 3 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Discharge of collected animal effluent
surface greater than 10m2 for a period greater than 12 hours or runoff (visibleoverland flow).
/S14/024 Egon Guttke 5.3.2 Discharge
of contaminantsAmend Remove reference to "gully" in all rules [Rule R71, R72, R75, R76,
R77, R81, R89 and R91].Accept
/S14/027 Egon Guttke Rule R71: Pit
latrine - permitted activity
Amend Replace Rule R71 with the corresponding rule in the operative plan. [Rule 5 of operative Discharges to Land Plan, p82]
Accept in part
FS67/006 The Carter Family Support AllowS14/028 Egon Guttke Rule R72:
Composting toilets - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule R72(c) by replacing current wording "the discharge is not within 50m of a surface water body ... potablesupply" with "the discharge does not drain into a surface waterbody". [Also see S27/014]
Reject
/S15/002 NZ Steel 2.2 Definitions Amend Add a definition for 'contaminant'. Proposed definition:
"Contaminant includes: oil, petrol, diesel, paint, solvents, natural soil particles, nutrients, eco-toxicants, pathogens, sewage and sediment at levels known to adversely impact aquatic health, aquatic ecosystem health and mahinga kai outcomes as described in Tables 3.1-3.54 [3.1-3.8] of Chapter 3 (Objectives) of the [Proposed] Natural Resources Plan for the Wellington Region".
Reject
FS57/005 The Oil Companies Oppose DisallowS28/005 Jeffrey Arthur Policy P95:
Discharges to land
Amend Amend P95 in order to ensure alignment between P90, P95 and P96 [See also S28/006 and 007]
Accept in part
/S28/007 Jeffrey Arthur Policy P96:
Managing land use
Amend Amend P96 to state that 'good management practices' shall include where possible the capture and containment of any contaminants followed by the disposal in an approved manner.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 4 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
[See also S28/005 and 006]
/S28/009 Jeffrey Arthur Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Support [Retain] Reject
/S28/011 Jeffrey Arthur Policy P95:
Discharges to land
Amend No more contaminated sites Accept in part
/S28/013 Jeffrey Arthur Policy P95:
Discharges to land
Amend All or proposed shooting ranges to be listed as a 'Non Complying activity' within the plan
Reject
/S28/016 Jeffrey Arthur Policy P96:
Managing land use
Amend Any shooting range to be constructed in according with Best Management Plans, in accordance with UK & European BMP standards.
Reject
/S29/009 Powerco Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Oppose Modify Objective O46 as follows:Discharges to land are managed to reduce the adverse effects of runoff or leaching of contaminants to water
Reject
FS85/103 Carterton District Council Support AllowS31/013 Hamish Trolove Method M17:
Reduce waste and use water and energy efficiently
Support Support Accept
/S31/014 Hamish Trolove Policy P95:
Discharges to land
Amend Recognise some discharges can cause soil to emit climate changing gases at a higher rate than they would do otherwise.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 5 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S31/015 Hamish Trolove Policy P96:
Managing land use
Amend Recognise effect of land use change and land cover on region's climate change emissions profile.
Reject
/S33/004 Porirua Harbour and Catchment
Community TrustObjective O46: Discharges to land
Amend Strengthen the wording of Objective O46 to reflect the language and targets in the Porirua Harbour Strategy and Action Plan to reduce sediment inputs to harbour and waterways to more natural levels with a target of reducing sediment inputs by 50% by 2021, and sediment inputs to 1mm/year by 2031, and to significantly improve harbour water clarity and harbour flushing capacity.
Accept in part
/S33/036 Porirua Harbour and Catchment
Community Trust5.3.2 Discharge of contaminants
Amend Amend plan, ahead of the Whaitua process, to include specific provisions relating to nutrientrun off from land uses in the Porirua harbour catchment such as golf courses.
Reject
/S33/037 Porirua Harbour and Catchment
Community Trust5.3.2 Discharge of contaminants
Amend Amend rules to include specific provisions to address septic tank discharges from intensive lifestyle use in the Porirua Harbour catchment.
Reject
/S35/003 Allan A Smith Gully Amend Delete the definition or amend the definition [to be more
restrictive] or remove the reference to gully from all discharge to land rules.
Accept
FS1/062 Waa Rata Estate Support AllowS35/013 Allan A Smith Rule R70:
Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Amend Amend R70 (f) to increase the permitted volume to 400m3. Accept
FS1/070 Waa Rata Estate Support in part
Allow in part
S35/014 Allan A Smith Rule R71: Pit Amend Amend the conditions of R71 to make them less draconian in their Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 6 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
latrine - permitted activity
impact.
FS1/071 Waa Rata Estate Support Allow in partFS67/018 The Carter Family Support Allow
S41/001 KapAg Ltd Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Either R83(h) or the Section 32 report, should make it clearthat to meet the condition, the people qualified to use the Dairy EffluentStorage Calculator include both accredited companies AND individuals that havepassed the Massey University short course on farm dairy effluent system design.
Reject
/S46/005 Kintyre Meats/Kintyre Trust Policy P96:
Managing land use
Oppose in part
Continue existing use provisions as of right within anyconsent renewal process with an opportunity of submission and appeal.
Reject
/S55/008 The Oil Companies Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Oppose Modify Objective O46 as follows.Discharges to land are managed to reduce the adverse effects of runoff or leaching of contaminants to water
Reject
FS55/003 Rural Residents Environmental Society Incorporated
Oppose Disallow
FS71/058 Horticulture NZ Support in part
Allow in part
FS69/031 Wellington International Airport Limited Support in part
Allow in part
S55/032 The Oil Companies Policy P95: Discharges to land
Oppose Modify Policy 95 as follows:The discharge of contaminants to land shall be managed by:(a)... (f) not resulting in a discharge that enters water ensuring the discharge does not result in more than minor adverse effects on water.
Accept
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 7 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S66/001 GBC Winstone Cleanfill material Amend Modify the definition so that it:a) provides for a small proportion of
organic material (say 2% by truckload) in soils and clays and material that is otherwise cleanfill b) clearly excludes wet wastes such as hydro excavated material from item (e) in the definition.
Reject
/S66/019 GBC Winstone Rule R93: All
other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Support Retain the rule unchanged. Reject
/S70/007 David Wilson 3.11 Discharges Support [Retain Objectives O46-O51]. Accept
/S74/008 Kairoa Farms Limited Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Amend R83:- by undertaking a more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements prior to the hearing to support proper consideration by the Hearing Commissioners, and- to provide reasonable time frames and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (e.g. 3-5 years), and- to extend the consent time frame to 20 years.
Reject
/S74/009 Kairoa Farms Limited Rule R93: All
other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Oppose Amend R93:- by undertaking a risk analysis in groundwater protection areas, prior to the hearing, to support appropriate conditions being established in a controlled rule, rather than discretionary, and- to extend the consent time frame to 20 years.
Reject
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 8 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S74/010 Kairoa Farms Limited Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Clarify the use of the term ponding in R83 and amend R83 to exclude extreme weather events and breakdowns occurring out of manager's control.
Reject
/S74/020 Kairoa Farms Limited Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete the requirement in R90 for impermeable lining, and retain the condition that there be no discharge to water.
Reject
/S74/021 Kairoa Farms Limited Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete the requirement in R90 that does not allow storage within 20m of a surface water body.
Reject
/S74/022 Kairoa Farms Limited Silage Oppose Amend definition of 'silage' to specify this does not include
baleage.Reject
/S74/040 Kairoa Farms Limited Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Amend Rule 89, Farm Refuse Dumps:- increase size from 50m3 to 100m3 - heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects
Reject
/S74/041 Kairoa Farms Limited Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Amend Rule 91: Offal Pits - retain condition a) re only containing dead matter from the property; and condition h) odour is not offensive beyond the boundary - heavily prune the other seven conditions to focus on effects
Reject
/S74/043 Kairoa Farms Limited Rule R82: Oppose Amend condition a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 9 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
application
/S75/013 Minister of Conservation Vertebrate toxic
agentAmend Amend definition:
... Vertebrate toxic agents are regulated under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 and the Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997. and include vertebrate pest control products as identified (but not defined) in NZS8409:2004 Management of Agrichemicals
Accept
/S75/039 Minister of Conservation Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Support Retain as notified Accept in part
FS65/014 Land Matters Ltd Support AllowS75/042 Minister of Conservation Objective O49:
Wastewater discharges to land
Support Retain as notified Accept in part
FS65/017 Land Matters Ltd Support AllowS75/134 Minister of Conservation Rule R87: Land-
based discharge of vertebrate toxic agents - permitted activity
Support Retain permitted activity Rule R87 Accept
/S75/135 Minister of Conservation Rule R87: Land-
based discharge of vertebrate toxic agents - permitted activity
Amend Delete (b) and (c Reject
FS53/027 Beef and Lamb NZ Support Allow
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 10 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S75/136 Minister of Conservation Rule R88: Aerial application of vertebrate toxic agents - controlled activity
Amend Amend R88 to make the discharge of VTAs a permitted activity, delete control (b) and the matters of control 1-3. Amend the Plan to permit discharge of VTAs to water, such as by amending R88 as follows:
The discharge of a vertebrate toxic agent into water or onto or into land and where it may enter water by aerial application...
Reject
FS74/199 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowFS53/028 Beef and Lamb NZ Support AllowFS82/032 Regional Public Health Support Allow
S75/137 Minister of Conservation 5.3.7 Vertebrate toxic agents
Neither support or oppose
Add new rule as follows or similar:Rule R88A: Vertebrate toxic agents into water - restricted discretionary activity
The discharge of vertebrate toxic agents into water for the control of invasive aquatic organisms is a restricted discretionary activity provided the following conditions are met:
(a) The substance and application technique or method is approved for use by the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 and the use and discharge of the substance is in accordance with all controls of the approval.
Matters for discretion:1. Effects on community drinking water supply water quality2. Effects on non-target species and aquatic
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 11 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
ecosystem health including beneficial effects.
FS74/200 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Support AllowFS53/026 Beef and Lamb NZ Support Allow
S81/001 New Zealand Defence Force Cleanfill material Amend Make the necessary amendments to be clear that earthworks operations will not be subject to the cleanfill rules, and that cleanfilling will not require consent to undertake earthworks.
Accept
/S81/023 New Zealand Defence Force 5.3.2 Discharge
of contaminantsAmend Amend the rules in sections 5.2.2 and 5.3.2 and/or insert
guidance notes to clarify which rules apply.Accept in part
/S81/030 New Zealand Defence Force Rule R70:
Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Amend Amend the permitted conditions in R70 to clarify the time-frames for cleanfilling.
Accept
/S82/030 Meridian Energy Limited Rule R93: All
other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Support Retain Rule 93 Reject
/S85/008 Roading, Parks and Gardens and
Solid Waste departments of Hutt City Council and Upper Hutt City Council
Policy P91: Landfills
Oppose Amend P91 to appropriately provide for landfills, both new andexisting.
Reject
/S85/009 Roading, Parks and Gardens and
Solid Waste departments of Hutt City Council and Upper Hutt City Council
Policy P91: Landfills
Not stated Amend the Plan to include policies to recognise the benefits andneed for solid waste management and disposal, and revise the rules todifferentiate activity status between activities with different levels ofeffect.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 12 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S85/018 Roading, Parks and Gardens and
Solid Waste departments of Hutt City Council and Upper Hutt City Council
Rule R93: All other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Amend Include specific rules addressing discharges to land from landfills. Reject
FS30/091 Masterton District Council Support AllowFS26/116 South Wairarapa District Council Support Allow
S85/019 Roading, Parks and Gardens and Solid Waste departments of Hutt City Council and Upper Hutt City Council
Policy P91: Landfills
Amend Retain the wording of Policy P91, with the inclusion of 'and anysubsequent amendments' to clause (e) regarding the management of closedlandfills.
Reject
/S102/002 Petroleum Exploration and
Production Association of New Zealand
Policy P92: Discharges from hydraulic fracturing
Amend Submitter recommends that a policy from the Draft freshwater and Land Management Plan for Taranaki outlines a more comprehensive approach to managing this issue, in Policy P92.
Well or bore siting, construction, alternation, or decommissioning must be managed in a way that: (a) complies with recognised standards, codes of practice, or regulations, particularly in relation to the maintenance of well or bore integrity and decommissioning;(b) avoids aquifer cross-contamination or aquifer contamination from open or unsealed wells or bores, and from other operational activities;(c) selects best practice drilling and construction methods, including the type of muds and other construction materials used;(d) minimises effects on the reliability of groundwater supply for properly constructed, efficient and fully functioning existing bores; and(e) ensures that well or bore logs are prepared and made available for the construction or alteration of wells or bores."
Accept
FS25/031 Wellington Water Limited Support AllowS102/003 Petroleum Exploration and
Production Association of New Zealand
Policy P93: Disposal of hydraulic fracturing
Oppose Oppose Policy P93 as there is no logical reason why disposal of fracturing materials is treated any differently from other chemical or materials.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 13 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
chemicals or materials
/S103/005 Wairarapa Winegrowers Association Rule R85:
Application of compost to land - permitted activity
Support Retain Accept in part
FS71/124 Horticulture NZ Oppose DisallowS103/006 Wairarapa Winegrowers Association Rule R86:
Application of compost to land - restricted discretionary activity
Support Retain Accept in part
/S103/007 Wairarapa Winegrowers Association Rule R85:
Application of compost to land - permitted activity
Amend Insert a new Rule providing for the discharge of winery wastewater system sludge to land subject to appropriate conditions as a permitted activity.
Accept in part
/S103/008 Wairarapa Winegrowers Association Rule R80:
Discharge of treated wastewater - restricted discretionary activity
Amend Submitter has requested three additional rules for the discharge of viticulture and horticulture liquid wastes.
See submission (S103) for full details.
Accept in part
/S103/009 Wairarapa Winegrowers Association Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule 90(c) as follows: (c) stormwater runoff is prevented from entering into the manufacture or storage area, and
Leave Rule R90(d) unchanged.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 14 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S104/005 Cuttriss Consultants Limited Rule R70:
Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule R70:(f) relates to a greater volume of material (i.e.1000 cubic metres) that the rule be amended to include an exemption that enables earthworks being undertaken in association with a subdivision, and/or earthworks associated with residential and building developments be exempt from the standards set under (f).
Reject
/S112/028 Friends of the Paekakariki Streams Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Support [Not stated] Accept in part
/S112/031 Friends of the Paekakariki Streams Objective O49:
Wastewater discharges to land
Support [Not stated] Accept in part
/S112/067 Friends of the Paekakariki Streams Policy P84: On-
site domestic wastewater management
Support [Not stated] Accept in part
/S112/068 Friends of the Paekakariki Streams Policy P85:
Biosolids and treated wastewater to land
Support [Not stated] Accept in part
/S112/069 Friends of the Paekakariki Streams Policy P96:
Managing land use
Support [Not stated] Reject
/S112/094 Friends of the Paekakariki Streams Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application
Amend Change to discretionary Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 15 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
- permitted activity
FS46/030 Ravensdown Limited Oppose DisallowS113/006 Michael John Slater Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete Rule R90. Reject
/S113/007 Michael John Slater Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Delete Rule R89 [condition d, f and g]. Reject
/S113/008 Michael John Slater Rule R70:
Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Oppose Delete Rule R70 [condition f and g]. Accept in part
/S113/011 Michael John Slater Rule R85:
Application of compost to land - permitted activity
Oppose Delete Rule [R85?] Accept in part
/S113/026 Michael John Slater Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S113/031 Michael John Slater Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S113/032 Michael John Slater Rule R90:
Manufacture and Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that
there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 16 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
/S113/049 Michael John Slater Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S113/050 Michael John Slater Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S113/052 Michael John Slater Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S116/001 Henergy Cage-Free Limited Animal effluent Amend The definition of animal effluent be amended to exclude dry
poultry manure, or amending the submitters second submission decision request.
Accept in part
/S116/002 Henergy Cage-Free Limited Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend The discharge of raw poultry manure solids (where moisture levels by weight are less than 40%) to land for soil conditioning and fertilising pasture and cropping land be provided for as a permitted activity, subject to fair and reasonable standards; and any related or consequential amendments to give effect to the intent of this submission.
Accept
/S116/003 Henergy Cage-Free Limited Rule R83:
Discharge of Support in part
That Rule R83 be amended as follows, or similar with the same intent and effect:
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 17 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
1. That R83(c) be amended to read "poultry farms (except as provided for in Rule R82 as a permitted activity)"; and2. That R83 Matter 2 be amended to read "For dairy farm activities, maximum herd size for the property";3. That Matter 3 be amended to read "Nutrient loading rates, from the perspective of the ability of the soil and any pasture or crops to assimilate any nutrients and the effects of overland flow to be managed", and4. That R83 Matter 5 be deleted in its entirety.
/S119/003 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Silage Amend Amend high moisture to be defined as above 75% moisture
contentReject
/S119/004 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited 2.1.6 Definitions,
schedules and maps
Amend Add new definition for "ponding": areas of ponded effluent on the ground surface greater than 10m2 for a period greater than 12 hours or runoff (visible overland flow)
Reject
/S119/014 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Policy P94:
Discharge of collected animal effluent
Amend Amend by deleting (b)(iv) Accept
/S119/015 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Policy P94:
Discharge of collected animal effluent
Amend Add definition for ponding as: areas of ponded effluent on the ground surface greater than 10m2 for a period greater than 12 hours or runoff (visible overland flow)
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 18 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S119/016 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Policy P94:
Discharge of collected animal effluent
Amend Move policy to section 4.8.8 Accept
/S119/021 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend (f) by amending ponding to be defined as: areas of ponded effluent on the ground surface greater than 10m2 for a period greater than 12 hours or runoff (visible overland flow)
Reject
/S119/022 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend "Suggested wording to replace (g): The entire extent of effluent storage and treatment facilities (including sumps and ponds) must be sealed so as to restrict seepage of effluent where all or any part of the storage facility (including weeping walls, stone traps, sumps and ponds) is established or extended (including deepening) from the date the Plan is made operative. The permeability of the sealing layer must not exceed 1x10-9m/s subject to the following exceptions:(i) Where there are multiple ponds that make up the storage facility, but not all are being extended then only those that are being extended are required to be fully sealed, or(ii) The establishment or extension of sumps,weeping walls or stone traps alone do not trigger a requirement for sealing of existing ponds."
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 19 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S119/023 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend [Regarding (h)] A collaboratively produced section 32 analysis is needed.
Reject
/S119/024 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend rule by including the limits that are being used Reject
/S119/025 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Split rule into 2 separate rules - silage and compost. Reject
/S119/026 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Delete R90 (b) from silage rule Reject
/S119/027 Kaiwaiwai Dairies Limited Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Delete rule or more consultation with the rural sector about what is being attempted to be achieved with this rule.
Reject
/S120/003 Java Trust Limited Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend [Rule R89] so farm refuse dumps are a permitted activity without restrictions or conditions; amend all related provisions accordingly; all incidental and consequential amendments.
Reject
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 20 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S120/015 Java Trust Limited Policy P95: Discharges to land
Amend Delete P95(c), (d) and (f). Amend all related provisions accordingly. All incidental andconsequential amendments.
Reject
/S122/003 Carrus Limited Rule R70:
Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule R70 so that:(f) relates to a greater volume of material (i.e. 1000 cubic metres)-the rule includes an exemption that enables earthworks being undertaken in association with a subdivision, and/or earthwork associated with residential and building developments be exempt from the standards set under (f).-a new rule is inserted allowing for activities that cannot meet one or two or the Permitted Activity Standards to be considered as a Controlled or Restricted Discretionary Activity with control or discretion being retained over the standard(s) not met.
Reject
/S125/018 Rural Residents Environmental
Society IncorporatedPolicy P95: Discharges to land
Support Amending the policy as follows: (e)avoiding or minimising effects on public health and amenity, vertebrate and invertebrate animal health, and (f) not resulting in a discharge that enters water including ground water.
Accept in part
/S125/019 Rural Residents Environmental
Society IncorporatedPolicy P96: Managing land use
Amend Policy P96: Managing land use. Rural land use activities for production and residential purposes is recognised and shall be managed using good management practice.
Reject
/S127/027 Wairarapa Regional Irrigation Trust Policy P96:
Managing land use
Support Support. Accept
/S128/003 Diane Strugnell Rule R74:
Existing on-site wastewater systems -
Amend Clarification on how a condition that contains a specificmeasure might be anticipated, for example, what might trigger this level ofdetail being sought or measured for compliance with the condition
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 21 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
permitted activity
/S128/004 Diane Strugnell Rule R75: New or
upgraded on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Amend Clarification on how a condition that contains a specificmeasure might be anticipated, for example, what might trigger this level ofdetail being sought or measured for compliance with the condition
Accept in part
/S130/001 Liam Andrew Knight 5.3.4 Treated
wastewaterAmend Amend the scope of the provision to include urupa and
cemetaries.Reject
/S130/002 Liam Andrew Knight Rule R79:
Discharge of treated wastewater - controlled activity
Support in part
Retain Accept in part
/S132/026 Hammond Limited Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Delete condition (g) of R89 as follows:... (g) there is no burning of the contents of a farm refuse dump, and...
Reject
/S132/027 Hammond Limited Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend R90 as follows:...d) the walls and floor of a silage storage area shall where practicable have an impermeable lining able to withstand corrosion, and there shall be no discharge of leachate to water, and ...
Reject
/S133/011 Greater Wellington Regional Council Rule R90:
Manufacture and Amend Amend to require commercial (or large scale) compost
manufacturing to control seepage in accordance with condition (d) Accept
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 22 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
of Rule R90.
/S133/012 Greater Wellington Regional Council Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (b)(ii) to include all components of human sewage not just wastewater.
Reject
/S135/006 Wellington Water Limited Biosolids Amend Delete second half of the sentence. Accept
/S135/033 Wellington Water Limited Wastewater Amend Exclude "but excluding stormwater". Reject
/S135/046 Wellington Water Limited Objective O49:
Wastewater discharges to land
Amend Redesign the objective to recognise the existing wastewater disposal infrastructure from existing facilities in the four metropolitan cities in the region. It needs to align with the objective of recognising and protecting (consistent with the RPS objective) regionally significant infrastructure and the existing community investment. It needs to refer to the assimilative capacity of the receiving environment, recognising that land disposal has it own limitations.
Accept in part
/S135/098 Wellington Water Limited Policy P85:
Biosolids and treated wastewater to land
Amend Provide sufficient policy support and assessment criteria to support rules R77 to R80. Consider also referring to "Best management practices for applying biosolids to forestry plantations in New Zealand" GN Magesan, Hailong Wang, Peter Climton, February 2010 NZ Forest Research Institute Ltd.
Accept in part
FS54/084 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Support AllowS135/149 Wellington Water Limited Rule R71: Pit
latrine - permitted activity
Support No change sought. Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 23 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S135/150 Wellington Water Limited Rule R75: New or
upgraded on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Amend No change sought. Accept in part
/S135/152 Wellington Water Limited Rule R77:
Application of Aa biosolids to land - permitted activity
Amend Refer to the Ministry for the Environment "Guidelines for the application of biosolids to land in New Zealand".
Accept
/S135/153 Wellington Water Limited Rule R78:
Application of biosolids (Ab, Ba, or Bb) to land - restricted discretionary activity
Support Retain Accept
/S135/154 Wellington Water Limited Rule R79:
Discharge of treated wastewater - controlled activity
Support Retain Reject
/S135/155 Wellington Water Limited Rule R80:
Discharge of treated wastewater - restricted discretionary activity
Support Retain Accept in part
/S135/156 Wellington Water Limited Rule R81:
Drinking water treatment plant supernatant waste - controlled
Support Support Accept
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 24 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
activity/
S135/157 Wellington Water Limited Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Support Retain (e)(iii) to protect community drinking water supply areas. Accept
/S135/158 Wellington Water Limited Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Support Retain condition (d)(iii) to protect community drinking water supply areas.
Accept
/S135/191 Wellington Water Limited Method M17:
Reduce waste and use water and energy efficiently
Support Retain. Accept
/S135/220 Wellington Water Limited Objective O49:
Wastewater discharges to land
Amend Provision is made for re-consenting of existing coastal discharges from the wastewater treatment plants in the four metropolitan cities area, without new investigations of land-disposal alternatives. Alternatively, explicit provision be made for previous land disposal studies to be acceptable for this purpose.
Accept in part
/S135/222 Wellington Water Limited Objective O49:
Wastewater discharges to land
Amend The public health benefits of constructed bypass wastewater discharges in high rainfall events be recognised and provided for in the proposed plan
Reject
/S136/004 Regional Public Health Policy P84: On-
site domestic wastewater management
Amend Amend policy wording to add "New on-site domestic wastewater systems shall be avoided in areas where a reticulated sewer connection is available."
Accept
/S136/011 Regional Public Health Rule R72: Amend That Rule 72 is amended by adding a note after clause (d) Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 25 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Composting toilets - permitted activity
"Permission may be required from the relevant authority in respect of the discharge under other legislation or bylaws."
/S136/012 Regional Public Health Rule R73:
Greywater - permitted activity
Amend That clause (c) wording is amended to state that the discharge is not located within "20 meters of a surface water body, coastal marine area, gully, or a minimum of 20 meters of a bore used for water extraction for potable supply as determined by a site risk assessment". That clause (b) is amended to "the application rate of greywater shall not exceed a maximum daily volume of 2,000 litres and is site appropriate, and"
Accept in part
FS53/017 Beef and Lamb NZ Support in part
Allow
S136/013 Regional Public Health Rule R75: New or upgraded on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Amend That the wording of the proposed rule is amended to insert a new clause "(l) in the case of a new system, where a sewer connection is available". That the wording of the proposed rule clause (e)(i) is amended to "20 meters of a surface water body, coastal marine area, gully, or a minimum of 20 meters of a bore used for water abstraction for potable supply as determined by a site risk assessment, or"
Accept
FS53/019 Beef and Lamb NZ Support in part
Allow in part
S136/015 Regional Public Health Rule R77: Application of Aa biosolids to land - permitted activity
Amend That clause (d) wording is amended to state that the discharge "is not located within 20 meters of a surface water body, coastal marine area, gully, or a minimum of 20 meters of a bore used for water extraction for a potable supply as determined by a site risk assessment".
Reject
/S136/016 Regional Public Health Rule R78:
Application of biosolids (Ab, Ba, or Bb) to land - restricted discretionary activity
Amend That the rule is amended by adding a new clause 10 Matters for discretion: "Measures for monitoring emerging contaminants".
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 26 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
FS25/041 Wellington Water Limited Oppose DisallowS136/017 Regional Public Health Rule R81:
Drinking water treatment plant supernatant waste - controlled activity
Amend That the rule be amended to read "(a) the discharge is not located within 20 meters of a surface water body, the coastal marine area, gully, or a minimum of 20 meters of a bore used for water abstraction for potable supply as determined by a site risk assessment, and"
Reject
/S136/018 Regional Public Health Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend That the wording of proposed rule be amended by inclusion of a new clause "(d) the discharge is not to an area with existing elevated groundwater nitrate levels."
Accept in part
FS50/005 Fertiliser Association of New Zealand Inc
Oppose Disallow
FS46/031 Ravensdown Limited Oppose DisallowFS71/141 Horticulture NZ Oppose Disallow
S136/019 Regional Public Health Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend That the rule is amended to include a new clause 9 to matters of control stating "The maximum application rate reflects the background ground water nitrate concentration."
Reject
/S136/020 Regional Public Health Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Amend That the wording of the proposed rule is amended by adding a clause (i) the offal pit is located outside of a community drinking water protection area as shown on Map 26, Map 27a, map 27b or Map 27c.
Accept
/S140/057 Kiwi Rail Holdings Limited Rule R70:
Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Support in part
(a) the cleanfill material is not located within 20m of a surface water body, or bore used for water abstraction for potable supply unless it is being utilised to maintain or upgrade Regionally Significant Infrastructure, and...(e) the volume of cleanfill material deposited at a
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 27 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
property shall not exceed 100m3 unless it is being utilised to maintain or upgrade Regionally Significant Infrastructure, and
FS64/018 New Zealand Defence Force Support AllowFS59/049 Roading, Parks and Gardens and Solid
Waste departments of Hutt City Council and Upper Hutt City Council
Support Allow
S145/060 First Gas Ltd Rule R93: All other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Amend Retain Rule 93 Reject
/S146/021 NZ Transport Agency Gully Support Retain Reject
/S146/065 NZ Transport Agency Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Support in part
Amend Objective 46: Discharges to land are managed to reduce the runoff or leaching of contaminants to water to the extent practicable.
Reject
FS96/029 Queen Elizabeth II National Trust Oppose DisallowS146/157 NZ Transport Agency Rule R70:
Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Oppose [Delete existing conditions (a)-(h) and replace with]: The discharge of cleanfill material onto or into land is a permitted activity, provided the following conditions are met: (a) The cleanfill is not located within the bed of a river or lake, a river floodplain, coastal marine area or area at risk from inundation from coastal flooding.
Reject
FS82/023 Regional Public Health Oppose DisallowS146/158 NZ Transport Agency Rule R93: All
other discharges to land - discretionary
Support Retain Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 28 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
activityFS61/042 Minister of Conservation Support Allow
S151/014 Warren Bryant Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S151/019 Warren Bryant Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S151/020 Warren Bryant Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S151/037 Warren Bryant Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S151/038 Warren Bryant Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S151/040 Warren Bryant Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 29 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S152/021 Waa Rata Estate Policy P95: Discharges to land
Amend Amend Policy P95(f) to allow for water from the waterway to re-enter the same waterway.
Reject
/S152/031 Waa Rata Estate Gully Amend Amend
the definition to provide greater specificity and clarify of what 'gully'means.
Accept in part
/S152/054 Waa Rata Estate Rule R69: Minor
contaminants - permitted activity
Support Retain. Accept
/S152/055 Waa Rata Estate Rule R70:
Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Amend Delete subclause (f) specifying a volume of 100m3. Amend (g) so that situations where the material is sourced and depositedwithin the same property are exempt the requirement to record cleanfill information.
Reject
/S152/056 Waa Rata Estate Rule R71: Pit
latrine - permitted activity
Amend Delete reference to 'gully'. Amend map scale [Map 26, 27a-c. See submission point S152/008 ] to show the 'community drinking water supply protection area' at a local level so it is clear where rules apply.
Accept in part
/S152/057 Waa Rata Estate Rule R72:
Composting toilets - permitted activity
Support in part
Delete 'gully' from subclause R72(c). Accept
/S152/058 Waa Rata Estate Rule R73:
Greywater - permitted activity
Support Retain. Accept
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 30 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S152/059 Waa Rata Estate Rule R74: Existing on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Amend Permit replacement of the on-site domestic wastewater treatment and discharge system if it provides the same or better quality wastewater treatment discharges.
Reject
/S152/060 Waa Rata Estate Rule R75: New or
upgraded on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Amend Delete 'gully' from (e)(i).Permit replacement of an existing system in a community drinking water supply protection area if it provides if it provides the appropriate level of wastewater treatment
Accept in part
/S152/062 Waa Rata Estate Rule R77:
Application of Aa biosolids to land - permitted activity
Amend Clarify the meaning of AA, Ab, Ba, and Bb biosolids so laypeople know what they are.Exclude wastewater from domestic on-sitetreatment systems from rules R77 and R78.
Accept in part
/S152/063 Waa Rata Estate Rule R78:
Application of biosolids (Ab, Ba, or Bb) to land - restricted discretionary activity
Amend Clarify the meaning of AA, Ab, Ba, and Bb biosolids so lay people know what they are.Exclude wastewater from domestic on-site treatment systems from rules R77 and R78.
Accept in part
/S152/064 Waa Rata Estate Rule R79:
Discharge of treated wastewater - controlled activity
Amend Permit discharge of treated wastewater if it meets a certain standard within the community drinking water supply protection area. Amend map scale to show the 'community drinking water supply protection area' [Map 26, 27a-c. See submission point S152/008 ] at a local level so it is clear where rules apply
Reject
FS82/027 Regional Public Health Oppose in part
Disallow in part
S152/065 Waa Rata Estate Rule R82: Application of fertiliser from
Support in part
Insert in (a) the words: every reasonable endeavour is made to ensure the discharge is not onto or into
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 31 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
a surface water body...
FS88/002 Wainuiomata Rural Community Association
Support Allow
S152/066 Waa Rata Estate Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Clarify that subclause (d) involves the concentration of animals in a confined area at intervals of high frequency or for extended periodsExclude woolsheds.Permit the use of manure on gardens in community drinking water supply protection area.
Accept in part
FS53/023 Beef and Lamb NZ Support AllowS152/067 Waa Rata Estate Compost Amend Clarify
that sheep manure is a stabilised product.Reject
/S152/068 Waa Rata Estate Rule R87: Land-
based discharge of vertebrate toxic agents - permitted activity
Support Retain. Accept
/S152/069 Waa Rata Estate Rule R88: Aerial
application of vertebrate toxic agents - controlled activity
Support Retain. Accept
/S152/070 Waa Rata Estate Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Permit waste materials generated onsite to be disposed of onsite. Reject
/S152/071 Waa Rata Estate Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Amend Delete 'gully' from R91(b). Delete subclause (c) that limits the offal pit to two soil types.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 32 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S163/001 Porirua City Council Objective O49:
Wastewater discharges to land
Not stated This objective should acknowledge the need for a different policy approach that is appropriate for the metropolitan areas.
Accept in part
/S163/021 Porirua City Council Biosolids Amend Add the following words: "Note: this definition, and the associated
grading system used in rules R77 and R78, is from NZWWA Guidelines for the Safe Application of Biosolids to Land 2003."
Reject
/S163/073 Porirua City Council Policy P96:
Managing land use
Amend Provide further clarification within the policy to make it moremeaningful.
Reject
FS30/069 Masterton District Council Support AllowFS26/093 South Wairarapa District Council Support Allow
S163/100 Porirua City Council Rule R72: Composting toilets - permitted activity
Support [Retain] Accept in part
/S163/101 Porirua City Council Rule R73:
Greywater - permitted activity
Support [Retain] Accept
/S163/102 Porirua City Council Rule R75: New or
upgraded on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Amend Add a new rule specifically designed for communal wastewater treatment systems for small groups of properties, including small rural-based industries, rural primary production activities and rural commercial activities.
Reject
/S163/103 Porirua City Council Rule R77:
Application of Aa biosolids to land - permitted activity
Amend Clarify why the requirement to comply with the NZWWA Guidelines for the Safe Application of Biosolids to Land 2003 has been removed from the rule, or alternatively put this provision back in the rule.
Accept
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 33 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S163/104 Porirua City Council Rule R78:
Application of biosolids (Ab, Ba, or Bb) to land - restricted discretionary activity
Support [Retain] Accept in part
/S163/105 Porirua City Council Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Support [Retain] Accept in part
/S163/106 Porirua City Council Rule R85:
Application of compost to land - permitted activity
Support [Retain] Accept in part
/S163/107 Porirua City Council Rule R87: Land-
based discharge of vertebrate toxic agents - permitted activity
Support [Retain] Accept
/S163/155 Porirua City Council Method M17:
Reduce waste and use water and energy efficiently
Support [Retain] Accept
/S164/003 Wainuiomata Rural Community
AssociationRule R70: Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Amend This could be clarified in the definition of clean fill material. The current definition includes clay, soil and rock. We suggest the definition specifically excludes "river gravels" to avoid confusion. We also suggest that it be made clear whether amount of clean fill
Accept
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 34 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
material that can be discharged under this rule is an annual amount.
/S164/004 Wainuiomata Rural Community
AssociationRule R75: New or upgraded on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Support [Not stated] Reject
/S164/005 Wainuiomata Rural Community
AssociationRule R82: Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose We believe it is important to ensure that fertiliser application is done according to best practise so recommend that sub clause (a) is replaced by sub clause (b) from Rule 20 in the previous draft. [see full submission for draft of Rule R82]
Another way to achieve the purpose that we all wish to achieve, preventing large amounts of fertiliser entering our waterways, would be to link this Rule to Rule 42.
Accept in part
/S165/040 Transpower NZ Ltd Rule R74:
Existing on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Support Retain Accept in part
/S165/041 Transpower NZ Ltd Rule R75: New or
upgraded on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Support Retain Accept in part
/S165/042 Transpower NZ Ltd On-site domestic
wastewater treatment and discharge system
Support Retain Accept in part
/S165/043 Transpower NZ Ltd Rule R79: Support Retain Accept in partSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 35 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Discharge of treated wastewater - controlled activity
/S165/044 Transpower NZ Ltd Rule R93: All
other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Support Retain Reject
/S169/003 David and Michael Keeling Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Not stated Unrealistic condition for fertiliser not permitted to move beyond the boundary of the property, including as a result of wind drift.
Accept in part
/S169/004 David and Michael Keeling Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend We believe that permitted activity standards is sufficient to manage ponding. Odour condition should be amended to note that all practical steps will be taken to ensure that odour is not offensive or objectionable beyond the boundary. The discharge of animal effluent to land should be a permitted activity.
Reject
/S169/005 David and Michael Keeling Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend That the permitted activity standards are reduced to clearly focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S169/006 David and Michael Keeling Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Delete the requirement for a impermeable lining while retaining that there is no discharge to water.The definition of silage should be amended to not include balage.
Reject
/S169/007 David and Michael Keeling Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Not stated Change the definition to include in-situ burial of single carcasses. It is not practical to GPS every dead animal on a farm, and the reason for the limitations on the choice of soils is not clear.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 36 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S170/047 Chris Engel Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S170/052 Chris Engel Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S170/053 Chris Engel Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S170/070 Chris Engel Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S170/071 Chris Engel Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S170/073 Chris Engel Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 37 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S171/014 Stuart Woodman Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S171/019 Stuart Woodman Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S171/020 Stuart Woodman Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S171/037 Stuart Woodman Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S171/038 Stuart Woodman Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S171/040 Stuart Woodman Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S173/004 N and S Terry Rule R89: Farm Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing RejectSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 38 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
refuse dumps - permitted activity
environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
/S173/006 N and S Terry Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
/S173/007 N and S Terry Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
/S173/008 N and S Terry Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
/S274/036 Alexander Haddon Webster Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend (c) (ii) to read silty or clay soils where possible Reject
/S274/037 Alexander Haddon Webster Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Amend Clause (c) to read: silty or clay soils where possible Reject
/S274/038 Alexander Haddon Webster Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Neither support or oppose
Special exception [for cemetaries] Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 39 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S274/049 Alexander Haddon Webster Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend At the end of the current effluent consent the land holder will have 2 years to install lined ponds. When the new critera are met the consent period will be 20 years
Reject
/S276/001 Holcim (New Zealand) Ltd Cleanfill material Amend Modify: a) provides for a small proportion of organic material (say
5% by truckload) in soils and clays and material that is otherwise cleanfill; and b) clearly excludes wet wastes such as hydro excavated soil material from item (e) in the definition.
Reject
/S276/018 Holcim (New Zealand) Ltd Rule R70:
Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Oppose Retain Rule R70 and insert a new default for a controlled activity resource consent for any infringements of the performance standards in R70.
Accept in part
/S276/019 Holcim (New Zealand) Ltd Rule R93: All
other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Oppose [Refer to submission point S276/018] Reject
/S278/002 Derek Neal Fertiliser Amend Exclude lime Reject
FS71/025 Horticulture NZ Oppose DisallowS278/003 Derek Neal Offal pit Amend Delete "An offal pit should not contain farm refuse dump content." Reject
/S278/004 Derek Neal Silage Amend Add in "Excludes baleage" Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 40 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S278/012 Derek Neal Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend clause a) with addition of ..."or farm properties under the same ownership."
Accept in part
/S278/013 Derek Neal Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Delete clause c) (iii) Reject
/S278/014 Derek Neal Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Delete clause f) (ii) Reject
/S278/015 Derek Neal Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Delete clause g) Reject
/S278/016 Derek Neal Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Amend Amend clause a) with addition of ..."or farm properties under the same ownership."
Accept in part
/S278/017 Derek Neal Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Delete clause (f) Reject
/S278/018 Derek Neal Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Delete [clause g] Reject
/S279/056 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Amend Provide clear outcomes to be achieved, including by amending the objective to:Discharges to land are managed to avoid the runoff or leaching of contaminants to water where those contaminants, by themselves or in combination with other contaminants, will cause the freshwater objectives and limits in this Plan to be exceeded.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 41 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
FS54/016 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Oppose in part
Disallow in part
FS85/104 Carterton District Council Neither support or oppose
Not stated
S279/059 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Objective O49: Wastewater discharges to land
Amend Retain as notified Accept in part
/S279/126 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Policy P91:
LandfillsAmend Amend the policy and associated rules so that adverse effects on
fresh water from discharges from landfills should be avoided in the first instance rather than minimised. The policy should provide a cross-reference to policies that ensure that adverse effects on ecosystem health and mahinga kai are avoided. The policy should also be directive that any new or extended land fills shall be designed to avoid discharges that will have adverse effects on water, aquatic ecosystems and mahinga kai.
Accept in part
FS85/177 Carterton District Council Oppose DisallowS279/127 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Policy P92:
Discharges from hydraulic fracturing
Support Retain as notified Reject
/S279/128 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Policy P94:
Discharge of collected animal effluent
Amend Amend the policy so that it is linked in terms of outcomes to other policies in the Proposed Plan. The consideration of discharges of collected animal effluent should extend to the contribution that discharges make to achieving freshwater outcomes and limits in the Plan, achieving outcomes for significant sites, including nga taonga nui a kiwa. There should be express reference in the policy to animal effluent being managed in an integrated manner with all other point and non-point source discharges from the farming activity.
Reject
FS54/029 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Support in part
Allow in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 42 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S279/129 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Policy P95: Discharges to land
Amend Amend the policy and associated rules to ensure that discharges to land will not occur on sites of significance to mana whenua unless the adverse effects on the values of those sites are avoided.
Accept
FS84/078 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited
Oppose Disallow
S279/130 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Policy P96: Managing land use
Oppose Delete the policy and replace it with a comprehensive policy or suite of policies (and associated rules) that manage agricultural land uses in a manner that will be effective in achieving the objectives of the Proposed Plan (as amended by this submission) and meeting the statutory obligations in relation to the RMA, the NZCPS, the NPSFM and the RPS. See relief sought for Policy P65.
Accept
FS54/030 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Support in part
Disallow
S279/158 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc 4. Policies Amend Insert new policies and associated rules that manage oil and gas exploration and extraction, and the exploration and mining of materials from the sea floor.
Accept in part
/S279/181 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc 5. Rules Support [General support for rules in 5.3 discharges to land] Accept
/S279/182 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Rule R79:
Discharge of treated wastewater - controlled activity
Amend Include as matters of control and discretion: the effects of the discharge, including cumulative effects, on meeting the freshwater objectives and limits in the Plan; The effects of the discharge of sites listed in Schedules A to F and H; and The effects on the cultural and spiritual values of mana whenua.Clarified that mana whenua will be considered as potentially affected parties.
Accept in part
FS30/087 Masterton District Council Oppose DisallowFS54/036 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Support in
partNot stated
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 43 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
FS26/112 South Wairarapa District Council Oppose DisallowS279/242 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Policy P84: On-
site domestic wastewater management
Amend [see submission point s279/124] Accept
/S279/247 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Policy P93:
Disposal of hydraulic fracturing chemicals or materials
Support Retain Accept
/S279/259 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Rule R80:
Discharge of treated wastewater - restricted discretionary activity
Amend [see submission point s279/182] Accept in part
FS30/090 Masterton District Council Oppose DisallowFS26/115 South Wairarapa District Council Oppose Disallow
S280/019 Jan and Jock Richmond Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S280/020 Jan and Jock Richmond Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S280/037 Jan and Jock Richmond Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S280/038 Jan and Jock Richmond Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 44 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S280/040 Jan and Jock Richmond Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S281/014 Jim, Pascoe and Henry Reynolds Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S281/019 Jim, Pascoe and Henry Reynolds Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S281/020 Jim, Pascoe and Henry Reynolds Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S281/037 Jim, Pascoe and Henry Reynolds Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S281/038 Jim, Pascoe and Henry Reynolds Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S281/040 Jim, Pascoe and Henry Reynolds Rule R82: Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser Accept in partSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 45 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
application.
/S282/021 Wellington International Airport
LimitedObjective O49: Wastewater discharges to land
Amend Amend Objective O49 as follows:Discharges of wastewater to land are promoted over discharges to fresh water and coastal water where practicable.
Accept in part
/S285/053 Land Matters Ltd Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Amend R82(a) to provide for best practice when undertaking aerial top-dressing as opposed to a blanket no discharge rule.
Accept in part
/S285/054 Land Matters Ltd Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend R83 to provide for a variation to Rule 83(g) and any other relevant provisions which allows an extended period of time, in line with the timeframe granted to local authorities to upgrade stormwater systems (R50).
Reject
/S285/055 Land Matters Ltd Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend R89 so that it refers to a set-back distance from water supplies which are used for potable water. Allow for a refuse up to 100m3 in size. Delete clauses(c)(ii),(d)(i), (e), (h) and (i).
Reject
/S288/018 Terawhiti Farming Co. Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted
Oppose Amend the condition a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 46 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
activity/
S289/014 Charlotte and Toby McDonald Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S289/019 Charlotte and Toby McDonald Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S289/020 Charlotte and Toby McDonald Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S289/037 Charlotte and Toby McDonald Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S289/038 Charlotte and Toby McDonald Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S289/040 Charlotte and Toby McDonald Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 47 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S290/014 Robert Kyle Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S290/019 Robert Kyle Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S290/020 Robert Kyle Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S290/037 Robert Kyle Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S290/038 Robert Kyle Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S290/040 Robert Kyle Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S292/047 Andrew Patrick Rule R83:
Discharge of Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond
storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 48 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S292/052 Andrew Patrick Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S292/053 Andrew Patrick Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S292/070 Andrew Patrick Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S292/071 Andrew Patrick Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S292/073 Andrew Patrick Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S293/014 Margaret Niven Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 49 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
into land - controlled activity
weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S293/019 Margaret Niven Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S293/020 Margaret Niven Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S293/037 Margaret Niven Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S293/038 Margaret Niven Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S293/040 Margaret Niven Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S294/053 Bell Camp Trust Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted
Amend Amend R82 which provides for best practice when undertaking aerial top-dressing as opposed to a blanket no discharge rule. Supports changes to provisions that provide instead for 'best practice' and 'to avoid wherever practicable discharges to surface water bodies' by aerial topdressing pilots.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 50 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
activity/
S294/054 Bell Camp Trust Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Support a phased regime similar to that proposed for territorial authorities for the treatment of stormwater.
Reject
/S294/055 Bell Camp Trust Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend R89 so that it refers to a set-back distance from water supplies which are used for potable water. Allow for a refuse up to 100m3 in size. Delete clauses(c)(ii),(d)(i), (e), (h) and (i).
Reject
/S295/053 The Carter Family Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Amend R82(a) to provide for best practice when undertaking aerial top-dressing as opposed to a blanket no discharge rule.
Accept in part
FS1/087 Waa Rata Estate Support in part
Allow in part
S295/054 The Carter Family Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend R83 to provide for a variation to Rule 83(g) and any other relevant provisions which allows an extended period of time, in line with the timeframe granted to local authorities to upgrade stormwater systems (R50).
Reject
FS1/088 Waa Rata Estate Support AllowS295/055 The Carter Family Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend R89 so that it refers to a set-back distance from water supplies which are used for potable water. Allow for a refuse up to 100m3 in size. Delete clauses(c)(ii),(d)(i), (e), (h) and (i).
Reject
FS1/089 Waa Rata Estate Support AllowS295/071 The Carter Family Rule R75: New or
upgraded on-site wastewater
Amend Amend R75 to provide for on-site effluent disposal systems within a community drinking water supply protection area.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 51 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
systems - permitted activity
FS1/086 Waa Rata Estate Support AllowS297/053 Kennott Family Trust Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Amend R82(a) to provide for best practice when undertaking aerial top-dressing as opposed to a blanket no discharge rule.
Accept in part
/S297/054 Kennott Family Trust Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend R83 to provide for a variation to Rule 83(g) and any other relevant provisions which allows an extended period of time, in line with the timeframe granted to local authorities to upgrade stormwater systems (R50).
Reject
/S298/014 A T McKay Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S298/019 A T McKay Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S298/020 A T McKay Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S298/037 A T McKay Rule R89: Farm Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen RejectSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 52 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
refuse dumps - permitted activity
other conditions to focus on clear effects.
/S298/038 A T McKay Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S298/040 A T McKay Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S299/053 Julian and Ruth Blackett Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Amend R82(a) to provide for best practice when undertaking aerial top-dressing as opposed to a blanket no discharge rule.
Accept in part
/S299/054 Julian and Ruth Blackett Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend R83 to provide for a variation to Rule 83(g) and any other relevant provisions which allows an extended period of time, in line with the timeframe granted to local authorities to upgrade stormwater systems (R50).
Reject
/S299/055 Julian and Ruth Blackett Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend R89 so that it refers to a set-back distance from water supplies which are used for potable water. Allow for a refuse up to 100m3 in size. Delete clauses(c)(ii),(d)(i), (e), (h) and (i).
Reject
/S299/071 Julian and Ruth Blackett Rule R75: New or
upgraded on-site wastewater
Amend Amend R75 to provide for on-site effluent disposal systems within a community drinking water supply protection area.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 53 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
systems - permitted activity
/S301/019 Carterton District Council 2.2 Definitions Amend Add new definition for 'Distribution Uniformity': The ratio of the
average depth of irrigation water applied minus the average deviation from this depth, divided by the average depth applied, as would occur with overlapped areas wetted with irrigation water, expressed as a percentage.
[This definition is already included in current version of the PNRP]
Accept in part
/S301/022 Carterton District Council Wastewater Amend Amend the definition of 'wastewater' by deleting the words 'but
excluding stormwater'.Reject
/S301/053 Carterton District Council Policy P95:
Discharges to land
Amend Amend P95(f) as follows:"(f) not resulting in a discharge that enters surface water."
Reject
/S301/054 Carterton District Council 2.2 Definitions Amend Add definition for "natural capacity" consistent with the definitions
for "field capacity" and "deficit irrigation".Reject
/S301/061 Carterton District Council Rule R79:
Discharge of treated wastewater - controlled activity
Amend Increase the wind speed limit to 12 m/s.Delete the 10% limit on trade waste.Amend irrigation rate to 20mm per irrigation event.Allow greater flexibility in the form of proposed droplet size versus distribution uniformity.Amend minimum setback distances from boundaries and from surface water to allow discharge of treated effluent closer to boundaries.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 54 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
FS82/026 Regional Public Health Neither support or oppose
Not stated
S302/002 Fertiliser Association of New Zealand Inc
Fertiliser Support Retain Accept
/S302/003 Fertiliser Association of New
Zealand IncField capacity Support Retain Accept
/S302/007 Fertiliser Association of New
Zealand IncHigh risk soils Oppose Amend the definition of high risk soils to include a description of
the risk presented by the soils. A suggested amendment is as follows:High risk soils means: soils at risk of erosion, or increased nutrient leaching loss. These are identified as: soils with a high degree of preferential flow, artificial drainage or coarse structure with infiltration or drainage impediments, or soils on rolling/sloping country.
Or similar.
Accept in part
FS71/027 Horticulture NZ Oppose DisallowS302/024 Fertiliser Association of New
Zealand IncObjective O46: Discharges to land
Amend Amend Objective O46 as follows:Discharges to land are managed to reduce control levels of runoff or leaching of contaminants to water.
Reject
/S302/053 Fertiliser Association of New
Zealand IncPolicy P95: Discharges to land
Amend Amend Policy P95 as follows:The discharge of contaminants to land shall be managed by:(a) ensuring the discharge does not result in more than minor adverse effects to soil health, and(b) avoiding discharges that would create contaminated land, and(c) not exceeding the natural capacity of the soil to treat, use or remove the contaminant, and(d) not exceeding the available capacity of the soil to absorb and infiltrate the discharge, and(e) minimising effects on public
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 55 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
health and amenity, and(f) ensuring any adverse effects not resulting in a from a discharge that enters water are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
/S302/054 Fertiliser Association of New
Zealand IncPolicy P96: Managing land use
Support in part
Amend Policy P96 as notified.Rural land use activities shall be managed using industry agreed good management practice
Reject
/S302/059 Fertiliser Association of New
Zealand IncRule R82: Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule R82 as follows:Rule R82: Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial applications - permitted activity.The discharge of fertiliser onto or into land or into air is a permitted activity, provided the following conditions are met:(a) the discharge is not directly onto or into a surface water body or beyond the boundary of the property including as a result of wind drift, and...
Accept in part
/S302/060 Fertiliser Association of New
Zealand IncRule R85: Application of compost to land - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule R85 as follows:The discharge of compost onto or into land, and the associated discharge of odour, is a permitted activity provided the following conditions are met:...(c) nitrogen loading on the discharge area from all sources is less than150kg N/ha/year, and
Accept in part
FS53/025 Beef and Lamb NZ Support in part
Allow
S302/068 Fertiliser Association of New Zealand Inc
5.3.6 Fertiliser and animal
Amend Introduce a new rule as follows:Rule R94 - Application of Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 56 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
effluent fertiliser from ground-based or aerial applications - restricted discretionary activityThe discharge of contaminant from ground-based or aerial applications that does not meet the conditions of Rule R82 is a restricted discretionary activity.Discretion is restricted to the following matters:The effects of discharge of fertiliser directly onto or into a surface water body.The nature, effect and duration of any objectionable odour.Or similar.
FS71/140 Horticulture NZ Support AllowS302/071 Fertiliser Association of New
Zealand IncRule R93: All other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Support in part
Retain Reject
/S302/074 Fertiliser Association of New
Zealand IncRule R86: Application of compost to land - restricted discretionary activity
Amend Amend Rule R86 as follows:The application of compost onto or into land and the associated discharge of odour into air that is not permitted by Rule R85 is a restricted discretionary activity.Matters for discretion...3. Nitrogen loading rates...
Accept in part
/S303/014 Craig and Janet Morrison Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 57 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S303/019 Craig and Janet Morrison Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S303/020 Craig and Janet Morrison Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S303/037 Craig and Janet Morrison Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects. Remove distance rule. Allow existing use to continue if zoned rural.
Reject
/S303/038 Craig and Janet Morrison Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects. Remove distance rule. Allow existing use to continue if zoned rural.
Accept in part
/S303/040 Craig and Janet Morrison Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S304/003 Anders and Emily Crofoot Fallow land Not stated While the definition is not incorrect it does not necessarily
accurately reflect the most common current practice.Accept in part
/S304/007 Anders and Emily Crofoot Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted
Amend Delete (c) (v).(c)(vii) should have a time frame included, say 6 months
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 58 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
activity/
S304/008 Anders and Emily Crofoot Rule R90: Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Delete (d) or re-write to be "No direct discharge of leachate to water"
Reject
/S307/005 Horticulture NZ Fertiliser Amend Amend definition of fertiliser as follows:
Fertiliser means a) a substance or biological compound or mix of substances or biological compounds that is described as, or held out to be for, or suitable for, sustaining or increasing the growth, productivity, or quality of plants or, indirectly, animals through the application to plants or soil of-- (i) nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulphur, magnesium, calcium, chlorine, and sodium as major nutrients; or (ii) manganese, iron, zinc, copper, boron, cobalt, molybdenum, iodine, and selenium as minor nutrients; or (iii) fertiliser additives; and (b) includes non-nutrient attributes of the materials used in fertiliser; but (c) does not include substances that are plant growth regulators that modify the physiological functions of plants.
Accept in part
/S307/007 Horticulture NZ High risk soils Amend Include a slope category of over 20 degrees as being high risk
soils. Reject
/S307/027 Horticulture NZ Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Amend Amend Objective O46 Discharges to land are managed to reduce the potential for runoff or leaching of contaminants to water.
Reject
FS46/013 Ravensdown Limited Support AllowS307/048 Horticulture NZ Policy P95: Amend Clarify the relationship between Policy P95 and more activity Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 59 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Discharges to land
specific policies. Clarify what public health and amenity issues the policy seeks to address.
Amend Policy P95: The discharge of contaminants to land shall be managed by: a) ensuring the discharge does not result in more than minor adverse effects to life supporting capacity of soil health b) Avoiding discharges that would create contaminated land c) not exceeding the natural capacity of the soil to treat, use or remove the contaminant, and d) not exceeding the available capacity of the soil, to absorb and infiltrate the discharge e) minimising effects on public health and amenity, taking into account the existing background environment and f) not result in a discharge that enters water minimising adverse effects on surface and groundwater quality.
/S307/049 Horticulture NZ Policy P96:
Managing land use
Amend Amend Policy P96 Managing rural land use Reject
/S307/067 Horticulture NZ Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule R82 clause a) The discharge does not cause adverse effects beyond the boundary of the property.Add new clause: The applications will be undertaken using good management practices to minimise the potential for wind drift having regarding to the Code of Practice for Nutrient Management (Fertiliser Association).
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 60 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
FS50/011 Fertiliser Association of New Zealand Inc
Support Allow
FS74/260 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Support in part
Disallow
FS53/022 Beef and Lamb NZ Support AllowFS46/032 Ravensdown Limited Support Allow
S307/069 Horticulture NZ Rule R93: All other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Amend Amend Rule R93 to a restricted discretionary rule with matters of discretion.
Reject
FS74/262 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowFS53/033 Beef and Lamb NZ Support AllowFS85/220 Carterton District Council Oppose Disallow
S308/035 Fish and Game Objective O46: Discharges to land
Amend Amend objectives O44, O46, and O47, or create new objectives, and create associated policies and rules to manage the impacts of water takes, land use and ancillary discharge activities on freshwater [See original submission p34-36 for further details].
Accept in part
FS71/059 Horticulture NZ Oppose DisallowS308/061 Fish and Game Policy P96:
Managing land use
Oppose Include policies which ensure that [outcomes relating to water allocation, nitrogen leaching rates, nutrient budgets, livestock exclusion, intensified use in over-allocated catchments, nitrogen and phosphorous trading, and costs of reducing over-allocation are achieved; see original submission p46-47 for details].
Reject
FS84/012 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited
Oppose Disallow
FS71/092 Horticulture NZ Oppose DisallowFS52/011 Wairarapa Regional Irrigation Trust Oppose DisallowFS54/114 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Oppose Disallow
S308/090 Fish and Game Rule R79: Discharge of treated wastewater - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule so that activities are required to achieve the freshwater objectives.Insert a new rule that makes existing discharges non complying after 2030 where freshwater outcomes in section 3 tables are not achieved.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 61 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
New activities which would cause or contribute to the freshwater objectives in section 3 tables being exceeded should be prohibitedGive effect to relief sought policy P71 and apply the standards as amended in relation to policy P71
FS30/088 Masterton District Council Oppose DisallowFS85/211 Carterton District Council Oppose DisallowFS26/113 South Wairarapa District Council Oppose Disallow
S308/091 Fish and Game Rule R81: Drinking water treatment plant supernatant waste - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule so that under matters of control activities are required to achieve the freshwater objectives by 2030Give effect to relief sought policy P71 and apply the standards as amended in relation to policy P71
Reject
FS85/214 Carterton District Council Oppose DisallowS308/092 Fish and Game Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule so that under matters of control activities are required to achieve the freshwater objectives in section 3 tables including table 3.4 and 3.4a. Where the activity currently causes or contributes to over allocation then the activity must be managed in a manner consistent with improving the quality and reducing the quantity of its discharge so that the freshwater objectives including section 3 table objectives are achieved by 2030Give effect to relief sought policy P71 and apply the standards as amended in relation to policy P71
Accept in part
FS74/128 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Support AllowS308/093 Fish and Game Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend to include "shall not result in discharges entering water either directly or indirectly"
Reject
FS53/029 Beef and Lamb NZ Support in part
Allow in part
FS74/129 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Support AllowS308/094 Fish and Game Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost -
Amend Amend to include "shall not result in discharges entering water either directly or indirectly"
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 62 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
permitted activityFS74/130 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Support Allow
S308/095 Fish and Game Rule R91: Offal pit - permitted activity
Amend Amend to include "shall not result in discharges entering water either directly or indirectly"
Reject
FS53/031 Beef and Lamb NZ Support in part
Allow
FS74/131 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Support AllowS309/031 Ngā Hapū o Ōtaki Policy P92:
Discharges from hydraulic fracturing
Support Retain as notified Reject
/S309/037 Ngā Hapū o Ōtaki Rule R80:
Discharge of treated wastewater - restricted discretionary activity
Amend Rule to include "the effects on tangata whenua values" under matters of discretion
Accept
/S309/038 Ngā Hapū o Ōtaki Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Rule conditions (e) amended to Include land where there are groundwater connections to waterbodies listed in schedules B and C
Accept in part
/S310/002 Ravensdown Limited Fertiliser Support Retain as written Accept
/S310/004 Ravensdown Limited High risk soils Amend High risk soils means: soils at risk of erosion, or
increased nutrient leaching loss. These are identified as being soils with a high degree of preferential flow, artificial drainage or coarse structure with infiltration or drainage
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 63 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
impediments, or soils on rolling/sloping country.
/S310/018 Ravensdown Limited Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Oppose in part
Reword to: Discharges to land are managed to reduce the control levels of runoff or leaching of contaminants to water in accordance with good management practices
Reject
/S310/040 Ravensdown Limited Policy P95:
Discharges to land
Support in part
Clarify the relationship of Policy P95 with policies in Section 4.8.1; delete (e) and (f) from Policy P95 as they are not management mechanisms; and deleted the phrase 'and infiltrate' from clause (d).
Reject
/S310/041 Ravensdown Limited Policy P96:
Managing land use
Support in part
Retain the intent of Policy P96 including the use of good management practices and the intention to introduce a limit, target and/or allocation regime by way of a plan change in the future, and reword to read:"Rural land use activities shall be managed using operate at good management practice."
Reject
/S310/045 Ravensdown Limited Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Support in part
Amend to read:The discharge of fertiliser onto or into land or into air is a permitted activity, provided the following conditions are met:(a) the discharge is not directly onto or into a surface water body or beyond the boundary of the property including as a result of wind drift, and..."
Accept in part
/S310/046 Ravensdown Limited Rule R85:
Application of Oppose in part
Delete Condition (c) from Rule R85 Accept
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 64 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
compost to land - permitted activity
FS71/142 Horticulture NZ Support AllowS310/047 Ravensdown Limited Rule R86:
Application of compost to land - restricted discretionary activity
Oppose in part
Delete matter of discretion 3 from Rule R86. Accept
/S310/048 Ravensdown Limited Rule R93: All
other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Support Retain Reject
/S311/014 Beef and Lamb NZ Rule R69: Minor
contaminants - permitted activity
Amend Rewrite and align R42, R69 and R93 to providefor land uses that result in discharges to land where they may enter water,being a permitted activity, where the permitted land uses includes, but is notlimited to, all forms of primary production.
Reject
/S311/015 Beef and Lamb NZ Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Amend R82 (a) the discharge is not onto or into a surface waterbody, or beyond the boundary of the property, including as a result of wind drift ; ground-based and aerial applications of fertiliser must follow the latest available Fertiliser Association of New Zealand Code of Practice; and (b) for aerial discharges....
Accept
FS74/237 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowFS46/033 Ravensdown Limited Support Allow
S311/016 Beef and Lamb NZ Rule R89: Farm refuse dumps -
Amend Amend as: (b) the volume of a farm refuse dump shall not exceed 50m3 100m3
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 65 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
permitted activityFS74/238 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose Disallow
S311/017 Beef and Lamb NZ Rule R90: Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend as follows: (d) the walls and the floor of a silage storage area shall have an impermeable lining able to withstand corrosion, and there shall be no discharge of leachate water, and
Reject
FS74/239 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS312/014 Taratahi Agricultural Training
CentreRule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S312/019 Taratahi Agricultural Training
CentreSilage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S312/020 Taratahi Agricultural Training
CentreRule R90: Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Reject
/S312/037 Taratahi Agricultural Training
CentreRule R89: Farm refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S312/038 Taratahi Agricultural Training
CentreRule R91: Offal pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 66 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S312/040 Taratahi Agricultural Training
CentreRule R82: Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S314/014 John Carred Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S314/019 John Carred Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S314/020 John Carred Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S314/037 John Carred Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S314/038 John Carred Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S314/040 John Carred Rule R82: Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser Accept in partSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 67 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
application.
/S316/013 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedFarm refuse dump
Oppose Amend definition to read as follows: "A disposal site located on a property used to dispose of household and/or farm waste generated on that property or farm enterprise of which the property forms a part"
Accept in part
/S316/075 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedPolicy P94: Discharge of collected animal effluent
Amend Relocate Policy P94 to section 4.8.8. Accept
/S316/076 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedPolicy P95: Discharges to land
Amend Amend (c) as follows: "not exceeding the natural capacity of the soil to treat, use or remove remediate the contaminant effects, and."
Reject
/S316/077 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedPolicy P96: Managing land use
Amend Amend the note to Policy P96 as follows: "In future, rural land use activities may also be managed by A Llimits, targets and/or allocation frameworks will which may be established through the whaitua committee process and incorporated into the Plan through a future plan changes or variations., However, although a Whaitua committee may decide to continue with good management practices where this is achieving good environmental outcomes."
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 68 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
FS46/026 Ravensdown Limited Support AllowS316/099 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedRule R82: Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Reword conditions (a) and (b) of Rule R82 as follows: "(a) the discharge is not onto or into a surface water body or beyond the boundary of the property or properties comprising a farm enterprise including as a result of wind drift, and (b) the discharge of odour is not offensive or objectionable odour beyond the boundary of the property or properties comprising a farm enterprise, and..."
Accept in part
/S316/100 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedRule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend Rule R83:Delete condition (e)(iii) and amend conditions (g)(i), (g)(ii), (e)(ii) and (i) and the second matter of control [see original submission for detailed amendments]. Add a new advisory note.
Reject
/S316/101 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedRule R84: Discharge of collected animal effluent to water - non complying activity
Amend Amend Rule R84 as follows: "The discharge of collected animal effluent into water except in extreme weather events is a non-complying activity."
Reject
FS74/225 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS316/102 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedRule R85: Application of compost to land - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule R85 (d) as follows: "the discharge of odour is not offensive or objectionable beyond the boundary of the property or properties comprising a farm enterprise."
Accept in part
/S316/103 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedRule R89: Farm refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule R89 to amend (a) to read as follows: "(a) the contents of the farm refuse dump is from the property or properties comprising a farm enterprise where
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 69 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
the farm dump is located, and". Replace the term "property" with the term "farm enterprise" in conditions (c)(i), (c)(iii), (d)(ii) and (j).
/S316/104 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedRule R90: Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule R90 by deleting (d) and amending (e) as follows: "(e) the discharge of odour is not offensive or objectionable odour beyond the boundary of the propertyfarm enterprise."
Accept in part
/S316/105 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedRule R91: Offal pit - permitted activity
Amend Amend Rule R91 as follows: "(a) the offal pit shall only contain dead animal matter from the property farm enterprise where the offal pit is located, and" "(h) the discharge of odour is not offensive or objectionable odour beyond the boundary of the property farm enterprise, and"
Accept in part
/S317/052 Susannah and Mark Guscott Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S317/053 Susannah and Mark Guscott Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S317/073 Susannah and Mark Guscott Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 70 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S320/002 Charlie Matthews Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose [Oppose rule] Reject
/S320/020 Charlie Matthews Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S320/025 Charlie Matthews Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S320/026 Charlie Matthews Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S320/043 Charlie Matthews Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S320/044 Charlie Matthews Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S320/046 Charlie Matthews Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 71 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
/S321/047 Edward Handyside Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S321/052 Edward Handyside Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S321/053 Edward Handyside Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S321/070 Edward Handyside Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S321/071 Edward Handyside Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S321/073 Edward Handyside Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 72 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
- permitted activity
/S322/014 Rex McKay Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S322/019 Rex McKay Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S322/020 Rex McKay Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Reject
/S322/037 Rex McKay Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S322/038 Rex McKay Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S322/040 Rex McKay Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 73 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S323/014 DW and PC McKay Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S323/019 DW and PC McKay Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S323/020 DW and PC McKay Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S323/037 DW and PC McKay Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S323/038 DW and PC McKay Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S323/040 DW and PC McKay Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S324/014 Tim Williams Rule R83: Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond RejectSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 74 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S324/019 Tim Williams Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S324/020 Tim Williams Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S324/037 Tim Williams Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S324/038 Tim Williams Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S324/040 Tim Williams Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S331/014 Pip Tocker Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 75 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S331/019 Pip Tocker Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S331/020 Pip Tocker Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S331/037 Pip Tocker Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S331/038 Pip Tocker Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S331/040 Pip Tocker Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S332/014 Hiwi Trust Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land -
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 76 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
controlled activity consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S332/019 Hiwi Trust Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S332/020 Hiwi Trust Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S332/037 Hiwi Trust Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S332/038 Hiwi Trust Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S332/040 Hiwi Trust Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S334/014 Alan Westbury Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 77 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S334/019 Alan Westbury Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S334/020 Alan Westbury Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S334/037 Alan Westbury Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S334/038 Alan Westbury Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S334/040 Alan Westbury Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S336/014 Andrew Thomson Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 78 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S336/019 Andrew Thomson Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S336/020 Andrew Thomson Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S336/037 Andrew Thomson Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S336/038 Andrew Thomson Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S336/040 Andrew Thomson Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S337/063 Bob Tosswill Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 79 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S337/068 Bob Tosswill Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S337/069 Bob Tosswill Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S337/086 Bob Tosswill Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S337/087 Bob Tosswill Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S337/089 Bob Tosswill Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S339/014 Chris and Steven Price Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S339/019 Chris and Steven Price Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. RejectSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 80 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S339/020 Chris and Steven Price Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S339/037 Chris and Steven Price Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S339/038 Chris and Steven Price Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S339/040 Chris and Steven Price Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S340/004 Jim Hedley Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose R89 Delete condition (A) (b) Delete "not exceed 50m3" Reject
/S340/005 Jim Hedley Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete condition (d) Reject
/S340/008 Jim Hedley Rule R70: Oppose R70. Delete: Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 81 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Cleanfill material - permitted activity
(a) words"of a surface water body" or delete 20m and replace with 2mDelete (e) Delete (f)Delete (g)
FS82/021 Regional Public Health Oppose DisallowS340/083 Jim Hedley Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose In Rule R91 delete condition (a) (f) Reject
/S341/014 David Hume Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S341/019 David Hume Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S341/020 David Hume Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S341/037 David Hume Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S341/038 David Hume Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven
other conditions to focus on clear effects.Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 82 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
activity/
S341/040 David Hume Rule R82: Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S342/047 Gary James and Anne Marie Daysh Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S342/052 Gary James and Anne Marie Daysh Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S342/053 Gary James and Anne Marie Daysh Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S342/070 Gary James and Anne Marie Daysh Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S342/071 Gary James and Anne Marie Daysh Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 83 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S342/073 Gary James and Anne Marie Daysh Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S342/079 Gary James and Anne Marie Daysh Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
Reject
/S342/081 Gary James and Anne Marie Daysh Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
/S342/082 Gary James and Anne Marie Daysh Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
/S342/083 Gary James and Anne Marie Daysh Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
/S343/014 Andy Phillips Rule R83:
Discharge of Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond
storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 84 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S343/019 Andy Phillips Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S343/020 Andy Phillips Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S343/037 Andy Phillips Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S343/038 Andy Phillips Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S343/040 Andy Phillips Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S345/014 Alex Kyle Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 85 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
into land - controlled activity
weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S345/019 Alex Kyle Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S345/020 Alex Kyle Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S345/037 Alex Kyle Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects. Not one rule for all.
Reject
/S345/038 Alex Kyle Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects. Not one rule for all.
Accept in part
/S345/040 Alex Kyle Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S347/047 Brian Bosch Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas,
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 86 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S347/052 Brian Bosch Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S347/053 Brian Bosch Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S347/070 Brian Bosch Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S347/071 Brian Bosch Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S347/073 Brian Bosch Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S348/014 Max Lutz Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 87 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
investment made.
/S348/019 Max Lutz Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S348/020 Max Lutz Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S348/037 Max Lutz Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S348/038 Max Lutz Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S348/040 Max Lutz Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S348/095 Max Lutz Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Amend R82(a) to provide for best practice when undertaking aerial top-dressing as opposed to a blanket no discharge rule.
Accept in part
/S348/096 Max Lutz Rule R83: Amend Amend R83 to provide for a variation to Rule 83(g) and any other Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 88 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
relevant provisions which allows an extended period of time, in line with the timeframe granted to local authorities to upgrade stormwater systems (R50).
FS54/093 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Support Not statedS348/097 Max Lutz Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend R89 so that it refers to a set-back distance from water supplies which are used for potable water. Allow for a refuse up to 100m3 in size. Delete clauses(c)(ii),(d)(i), (e), (h) and (i).
Reject
/S348/113 Max Lutz Rule R75: New or
upgraded on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Amend Amend R75 to provide for on-site effluent disposal systems within a community drinking water supply protection area.
Reject
/S349/071 USNZ Rule R75: New or
upgraded on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Amend Amend R75 to provide for on-site effluent disposal systems within a community drinking water supply protection area.
Reject
/S350/026 Dan Riddiford Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S350/031 Dan Riddiford Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S350/032 Dan Riddiford Rule R90: Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 89 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
/S350/049 Dan Riddiford Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S350/050 Dan Riddiford Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S350/052 Dan Riddiford Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S351/053 Tim Mansell and family Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Amend R82 which provides for best practice when undertaking aerial top-dressing as opposed to a blanket no discharge rule. Supports changes to provisions that provide instead for 'best practice' and 'to avoid wherever practicable discharges to surface water bodies' by aerial topdressing pilots.
Accept in part
/S351/054 Tim Mansell and family Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend R83 to provide for a variation to Rule 83(g) and any other relevant provisions which allows an extended period of time, in line with the timeframe granted to local authorities to upgrade stormwater systems (R50).
Reject
/S351/055 Tim Mansell and family Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - Amend Amend R89 so that it refers to a set-back distance from water
supplies which are used for potable water. Allow for a refuse up to Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 90 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
permitted activity 100m3 in size. Delete clauses(c)(ii),(d)(i), (e), (h) and (i).
/S352/014 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Animal effluent Amend For the purpose of Rule R83 , means Dry or wet,
liquid, solid or semi-solid, treated or untreated faeces and urine from animals ...
Accept in part
/S352/020 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Compost Amend Any combination of solid or semi-solid vegetable and animal
waste that has fully decomposed and matured to a stabilised product. For the purposes of this plan rule xx, compost does not contain human sewage, dead animals or animal parts.
Accept in part
/S352/027 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Fertiliser Amend Add
For the purpose of Rule 82, lime is excludedReject
FS71/024 Horticulture NZ Oppose DisallowS352/029 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Gully Amend Either clarify or delete. Accept
FS1/012 Waa Rata Estate Support AllowS352/031 Federated Farmers of New Zealand High risk soils Amend Either clarify or delete. Accept
FS1/013 Waa Rata Estate Support AllowS352/038 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Offal pit Amend A hole excavated on a rural property for the sole purpose of
disposing of offal from that property.Does not include in-situ burial of single carcasses. An offal pit should not contain farm refuse dump contents.
Reject
FS1/016 Waa Rata Estate Support Allow
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 91 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S352/047 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Silage Amend A fermented, high-moisture stored fodder which can be fed to ruminants. Excludes baleage.
Reject
FS1/021 Waa Rata Estate Support AllowS352/101 Federated Farmers of New Zealand 3.11 Discharges Amend Amend title to Discharges to Land Accept
FS89/050 Fish and Game Oppose DisallowS352/102 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Oppose Delete Reject
FS89/051 Fish and Game Oppose DisallowS352/106 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Objective O49:
Wastewater discharges to land
Support Retain Accept in part
/S352/169 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Policy P95:
Discharges to land
Oppose Delete Reject
/S352/170 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Policy P94:
Discharge of collected animal effluent
Amend Policy P94: Discharge Application of collected animal effluent to landAny existing system to store, treat or dispose of collected animal effluent to return nutrients to the land shall be designed, constructed and maintained so that:a)
the collection, storage and distribution systems are sealed to avoid discharge of effluent outside the intended disposal area, andb) the discharge is to land, and:a. effluent is only discharged when the field capacity of the soil will not be exceeded, andb. effluent is discharged at a rate that can be absorbed and
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 92 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
treated by the soil and plants without ponding or surface runoff and without directly discharging to groundwater or through tile drains, andc. sufficient storage is provided so that effluent can be stored when weather or soil conditions are unsuitable for irrigation, in order to meet the conditions (b)(i) and (b)(ii) above, and d. discharges do not pond or flow to any surface water, ande. discharges avoid adverse effects on community drinking water supply protection areas shown on Map 26, Map 27a, Map 27b and Map 27c.Any new system to store, treat or dispose of collected animal effluent shall be designed so that sufficient storage is provided for deferred irrigation, except in extreme weather events.
FS82/015 Regional Public Health Oppose DisallowS352/171 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Policy P96:
Managing land use
Amend Rural land use activities shall be managed through an expanded non-regulatory programme delivered in partnership with industry and prioritised to key catchments and key issues to support using good management practice.Note: A limit, target and management or allocation framework will be established through the whaitua committee process and incorporated into the Plan through a future plan change or variation.
Reject
FS46/025 Ravensdown Limited Support AllowFS89/088 Fish and Game Oppose Disallow
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 93 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S352/191 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R70: Cleanfill material - permitted activity
Amend (a) the cleanfill material is not located within 20m 5m of a surface water body, or bore used for water abstraction for potable supply, and...d) the cleanfill material shall be managed (siting, design and operation) in accordance with Sections 5-8 in A Guide to the Management of Cleanfills (2002), ande) the volume of cleanfill material deposited at a property shall not exceed 100m3, and f) the volume and origin of the cleanfill material and the date the material has been deposited on this property, is recorded using GPS or mapped to an accuracy of at least 50m at a scale of 1:50,000; and a copy of this information is made available to the Wellington Regional Council upon request, andg) the cleanfill material shall be stabilised and re-vegetated within six months of completion of the activity.
Reject
FS53/016 Beef and Lamb NZ Support in part
Allow in part
FS82/022 Regional Public Health Oppose DisallowS352/192 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R71: Pit
latrine - permitted activity
Amend ...not located i) within 50m 20m of a surface water body, coastal marine area, gully or bore used for potable supply
Accept
FS74/066 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS352/193 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R74:
Existing on-site wastewater systems -
Amend d) the volume of domestic wastewater to be discharged from any one system shall not exceed 1,300L/day 2000L/day (calculated as a weekly average)
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 94 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
permitted activityFS53/018 Beef and Lamb NZ Support in
partAllow in part
S352/194 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R75: New or upgraded on-site wastewater systems - permitted activity
Amend e) i. 20m of a surface water body, coastal marine area, gully or bore used for water abstraction for potable supply, or...iv. a community drinking water supply protection area as shown on Map 26, Map 27a, Map 27b or Map 27c, and
Accept in part
FS1/050 Waa Rata Estate Support AllowFS74/067 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose Disallow
S352/196 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R82: Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend a) the discharge is not directly onto or into a surface water body or beyond the boundary of the property including as a result of wind drift, and
Accept in part
FS74/068 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS352/197 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend title:Discharge Application of collected animal effluent onto or into land from existing premisesAmend wording [see original submission p95-96 for detailed changes requested].
Reject
FS43/029 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society
Oppose Disallow
FS3/004 KapAg Ltd Support in part
Allow in part
S352/198 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land -
Amend Include new rule "Application of collected animal effluent onto or into land from new premises" [See original submission p96 for detail of wording].
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 95 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
controlled activityFS82/031 Regional Public Health Oppose in
partDisallow in part
FS3/005 KapAg Ltd Support in part
Allow in part
FS74/069 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS352/199 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R84:
Discharge of collected animal effluent to water - non complying activity
Amend The discharge of collected animal effluent into water is a non-complying activity except in extreme weather events.
Reject
FS74/070 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS352/200 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R85:
Application of compost to land - permitted activity
Amend The discharge application of compost onto or into land, and the associated discharge of odour, is a permitted activity provided the following conditions are met:a....b. the discharge shall not pond on the surface of the ground or run off from the discharge area into a surface water body, and cause a conspicuous change in colour or visual clarity beyond the zone of reasonable mixingc. nitrogen loading on the discharge area from all sources to is less than 150kg N/ha/year, and
Accept in part
FS46/034 Ravensdown Limited Support AllowFS74/071 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose Disallow
S352/201 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R89: Farm refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend: a. the contents of the farm refuse dump is from the property or under the same ownership where the farm dump is located, andb. the volume of a farm refuse dump shall not exceed 50m3 100m3, excluding vegetation
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 96 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
and clippings and...
Delete conditions c(ii), c(iii), d(ii), d(iii), f(ii), and (g)-(i).
FS74/072 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowFS71/144 Horticulture NZ Support Allow
S352/202 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R90: Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend a. the manufacture and storage area shall not be located within 20m 5m of a surface water body, ...b. the discharge does not contain:i. hazardous substances, orii. wastewater, offal or dead animal matter, andc. stormwater is prevented from entering into the manufacture or storage area, andd.the walls and floor of a silage storage area shall have an impermeable lining able to withstand corrosion, and there shall be no discharge of leachate to a surface water body, and
Accept in part
FS74/073 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS352/203 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Amend a. the offal pit shall only contain dead animal matter from the property or under the same ownership where the offal pit is located, andb. the offal pit shall not be located within:i. 50m 20m of a surface water body, coastal marine area, gully, or bore used for water abstraction for potable supply, andii. an area prone to flooding or ponding, andc. the offal pit shall be
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 97 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
located in silty or clay soils, andd. the bottom of the offal pit is 0.6m above the seasonally highest water table, and f. stormwater is prevented from entering the offal pit, andg. the location is recorded, by GPS or mapped to an accuracy of at least 50m at a scale of 1:50,000; and a copy of this information is made available to the Wellington Regional Council upon request, andh. the offal pit is re-contoured and re-vegetated to a condition that is compatible with the surrounding land within six months of completion.
FS1/052 Waa Rata Estate Support AllowFS74/074 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose Disallow
S352/247 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Method M17: Reduce waste and use water and energy efficiently
Amend Wellington Regional Council will work with city and district councils and industry to reduce waste and encourage...
Accept
FS25/056 Wellington Water Limited Support AllowS353/040 Royal Forest and Bird Protection
SocietyObjective O46: Discharges to land
Oppose Replace with:Discharges to land are managed in a manner that achieves the freshwater objectives in Table 3.4 -3.8.
Accept in part
FS84/031 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited
Oppose in part
Disallow
FS84/054 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited
Oppose in part
Disallow
S353/042 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society
Objective O49: Wastewater discharges to land
Support Retain Accept in part
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 98 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S353/098 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society
Policy P92: Discharges from hydraulic fracturing
Support Retain Reject
/S353/099 Royal Forest and Bird Protection
SocietyPolicy P93: Disposal of hydraulic fracturing chemicals or materials
Support Retain Accept
/S353/100 Royal Forest and Bird Protection
SocietyPolicy P94: Discharge of collected animal effluent
Support Retain Accept in part
/S353/101 Royal Forest and Bird Protection
SocietyPolicy P95: Discharges to land
Support in part
Amend to ensure provisions properly address diffuse discharges from stock.
Reject
FS84/037 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited
Oppose in part
Disallow
FS84/060 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited
Oppose in part
Disallow
S353/102 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society
Policy P96: Managing land use
Oppose Rural land use activities are undertaken in a manner consistent with Policy P65 (as recommended by Forest and Bird above) and good management practice.
Reject
FS71/093 Horticulture NZ Oppose DisallowFS84/061 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative
Group LimitedOppose in part
Disallow
FS84/038 DairyNZ and Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited
Oppose in part
Disallow
S353/135 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society
Rule R84: Discharge of collected animal effluent to water - non complying
Not stated Move rule to correct location. Accept
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 99 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
activity/
S354/014 Sam Orsborn Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S354/019 Sam Orsborn Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S354/020 Sam Orsborn Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S354/037 Sam Orsborn Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S354/038 Sam Orsborn Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S354/040 Sam Orsborn Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 100 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S355/014 Michael Hewison Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S355/019 Michael Hewison Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S355/020 Michael Hewison Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S355/037 Michael Hewison Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S355/038 Michael Hewison Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S355/040 Michael Hewison Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S355/044 Michael Hewison Rule R75: New or
upgraded on-site Amend [Decision unclear; refer to original submission for detail]. Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 101 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
wastewater systems - permitted activity
/S356/014 Mike Butterick Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S356/019 Mike Butterick Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S356/020 Mike Butterick Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S356/037 Mike Butterick Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S356/038 Mike Butterick Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S356/040 Mike Butterick Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 102 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
activity/
S357/003 Griffin Ag-Air Ltd Rule R82: Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.[Condition (c) should be a requirement of the Operator not the pilot]Delete condition (c)(iv)[not stated for condition (c)(v)]
Accept in part
/S358/004 Craig Dairy Farm Ltd Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
Reject
/S358/006 Craig Dairy Farm Ltd Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
FS82/028 Regional Public Health Oppose DisallowS358/007 Craig Dairy Farm Ltd Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
FS82/033 Regional Public Health Oppose DisallowS358/008 Craig Dairy Farm Ltd Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 103 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S359/001 NZ Pork Compost Not stated Definition excludes dead animals. This is an inconsistent
approach with other councils around the country.Accept
/S359/002 NZ Pork Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Not stated Submitter requests that the discharge of collected animal effluent from exiting farming activities should be a permitted activity. Existing operations are lawfully established and should not be controlled activities.
Reject
FS43/036 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society
Oppose Disallow
S360/014 Kyle Wells Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S360/015 Kyle Wells Rule R93: All
other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Oppose [Regarding discharge of collected animal effluent rule R83] In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary.
Reject
/S360/019 Kyle Wells Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S360/020 Kyle Wells Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 104 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S360/037 Kyle Wells Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S360/038 Kyle Wells Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S360/040 Kyle Wells Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S361/047 Sandra Shivas Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S361/048 Sandra Shivas Rule R93: All
other discharges to land - discretionary activity
Oppose [Regarding discharge of collected animal effluent rule R83] In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary.
Reject
/S361/052 Sandra Shivas Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage, which
is completely sealed so can't leak.Reject
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 105 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S361/053 Sandra Shivas Rule R90: Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Reject
/S361/070 Sandra Shivas Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S361/071 Sandra Shivas Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S361/073 Sandra Shivas Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S361/079 Sandra Shivas Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
Reject
/S361/081 Sandra Shivas Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 106 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S361/082 Sandra Shivas Rule R89: Farm refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
/S361/083 Sandra Shivas Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
/S363/014 Gavin Bruce Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S363/019 Gavin Bruce Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S363/020 Gavin Bruce Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S363/037 Gavin Bruce Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 107 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S363/038 Gavin Bruce Rule R91: Offal pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S363/040 Gavin Bruce Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S365/076 A J Barton Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S365/081 A J Barton Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S365/082 A J Barton Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body. [Delete the rule].
Reject
/S365/095 A J Barton Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Acknowledge that some operations in particular areas do not require effluent storage and remove mandatory requirement for storage. Adopt an effects-based approach taking rigorous consideration of cost/benefit analysis of pond storage systems.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 108 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
FS53/024 Beef and Lamb NZ Support in part
Allow
S365/099 A J Barton Rule R89: Farm refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S365/100 A J Barton Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.Delete condition (f) requirement for GPS mapping.
Accept in part
/S365/102 A J Barton Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S366/021 South Wairarapa District Council Soil moisture
deficitOppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Reject
FS85/061 Carterton District Council Support AllowS366/022 South Wairarapa District Council Field capacity Oppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Accept in part
FS85/036 Carterton District Council Support AllowS366/023 South Wairarapa District Council Deficit irrigation Oppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity, including
provision for "pseudo-deficit'irrigation. Accept in part
FS85/025 Carterton District Council Neither support or oppose
Not stated
S366/024 South Wairarapa District Council Distribution uniformity
Oppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Accept in part
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 109 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S366/025 South Wairarapa District Council Saturated hydraulic conductivity
Oppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Reject
FS85/057 Carterton District Council Support AllowS366/026 South Wairarapa District Council Low pressure
spray irrigationOppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Accept in part
FS85/038 Carterton District Council Neither support or oppose
Not stated
S366/028 South Wairarapa District Council Emerging contaminants
Oppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Accept in part
FS85/031 Carterton District Council Support AllowS366/031 South Wairarapa District Council Wastewater Oppose Delete the words "but excluding stormwater" from the definition of
wastewater. Reject
/S366/059 South Wairarapa District Council Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Oppose Amend Objective O46 to read as follows:Discharges to land are managed to reduce the adverse effects of runoff or leaching of contaminants to water.
Reject
FS55/010 Rural Residents Environmental Society Incorporated
Oppose Disallow
FS85/102 Carterton District Council Support AllowS366/061 South Wairarapa District Council Objective O49:
Wastewater discharges to land
Amend Retain Objective O49.Provide a proactive regulatory framework with regards to discharge to land in order to encourage this to occur.
Accept in part
/S366/089 South Wairarapa District Council Policy P85:
Biosolids and treated wastewater to land
Oppose Amend Policy P85 to read:The adverse effects on fresh water, including groundwater and coastal water and on soil from the application of biosolids or treated wastewater to land shall be minimised, or avoided, remedied, or mitigated. The application of biosolids
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 110 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
shall be managed in accordance with Guidelines for the safe application of biosolids to land in New Zealand, 2003.
FS74/286 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowFS82/014 Regional Public Health Oppose Disallow
S366/090 South Wairarapa District Council Policy P95: Discharges to land
Oppose Amend Policy P95 to remove ambiguities, including redefining key terms, as outlined earlier in this submission.
Accept in part
FS55/009 Rural Residents Environmental Society Incorporated
Oppose in part
Disallow in part
S366/111 South Wairarapa District Council Rule R72: Composting toilets - permitted activity
Oppose Amend Rule R72(c) to require a 20m setback, not a 50m setback. Accept
FS74/290 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS366/113 South Wairarapa District Council Rule R79:
Discharge of treated wastewater - controlled activity
Oppose Delete Rule R79 and rewrite to provide for a Permitted activity rule land discharge of treated effluent;Controlled activity for all other land discharges, subject to reasonable matters of control, not prescriptive operational and asset management directives; and Provision for alternative discharge designs and methods, not a prescriptive standard based on a single method.
Accept in part
FS30/089 Masterton District Council Support AllowFS85/213 Carterton District Council Support in
partAllow in part
FS82/025 Regional Public Health Neither support or oppose
Not stated
S366/114 South Wairarapa District Council Rule R80: Discharge of treated wastewater -
Oppose Delete Rule R80, and rewrite in conjunction with rewrite of Rule R79.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 111 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
restricted discretionary activity
FS53/021 Beef and Lamb NZ Support AllowS366/115 South Wairarapa District Council Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Neither support or oppose
Clarification that the consideration of human health impacts and reverse sensitivity effects have been fully considered.
Accept in part
/S366/116 South Wairarapa District Council Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated That the following changes by made to Rule R89:Amend R89(c)(i) to read "...on a property that is over 20ha 4ha, or"Amend R89(d)(ii) to read "50m 20m of a surface water body..."Delete R89(h) (GPS location and mapping) in its entirety
Reject
FS74/292 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS367/021 Masterton District Council Soil moisture
deficitOppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Reject
FS85/060 Carterton District Council Support AllowS367/022 Masterton District Council Field capacity Oppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Accept in part
FS85/035 Carterton District Council Support AllowS367/023 Masterton District Council Deficit irrigation Oppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity, including
provision for "pseudo-deficit"irrigation. Accept in part
FS85/026 Carterton District Council Neither support or oppose
Not stated
S367/024 Masterton District Council Distribution Oppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 112 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
uniformity/
S367/025 Masterton District Council Saturated hydraulic conductivity
Oppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Reject
FS85/058 Carterton District Council Support AllowS367/026 Masterton District Council Low pressure
spray irrigationOppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Accept in part
FS85/039 Carterton District Council Neither support or oppose
Not stated
S367/028 Masterton District Council Emerging contaminants
Oppose Review and rewrite the definition to avoid ambiguity. Accept in part
FS85/030 Carterton District Council Support AllowS367/031 Masterton District Council Wastewater Oppose Delete the words "but excluding stormwater" from the definition of
wastewater. Reject
/S367/059 Masterton District Council Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Oppose Amend as follows:Discharges to land are managed to reduce the adverse effects of runoff or leaching of contaminants to water.
Reject
FS59/020 Roading, Parks and Gardens and Solid Waste departments of Hutt City Council and Upper Hutt City Council
Support Allow
FS85/101 Carterton District Council Support AllowS367/061 Masterton District Council Objective O49:
Wastewater discharges to land
Amend Retain Objective O49.Provide a proactive regulatory framework with regards to discharge to land in order to encourage this to occur.
Accept in part
/S367/089 Masterton District Council Policy P85: Oppose Amend Policy P85 to read: Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 113 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Biosolids and treated wastewater to land
The adverse effects on fresh water, including groundwater and coastal water and on soil from the application of biosolids or treated wastewater to land shall be minimised, or avoided, remedied, or mitigated. The application of biosolids shall be managed in accordance with Guidelines for the safe application of biosolids to land in New Zealand, 2003.
FS74/285 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowFS82/013 Regional Public Health Oppose Disallow
S367/090 Masterton District Council Policy P95: Discharges to land
Oppose Amend Policy P95 to remove ambiguities, including redefining key terms, as outlined earlier in this submission.
Accept in part
/S367/111 Masterton District Council Rule R72:
Composting toilets - permitted activity
Oppose Amend Rule R72(c) to require a 20m setback, not a 50m setback. Accept
FS74/289 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS367/113 Masterton District Council Rule R79:
Discharge of treated wastewater - controlled activity
Oppose Delete Rule R79 and rewrite to provide for a Permitted activity rule land discharge of treated effluent; Controlled activity for all other land discharges, subject to reasonable matters of control, not prescriptive operational and asset management directives; and Provision for alternative discharge designs and methods, not a prescriptive standard based on a single method.
Accept in part
FS82/024 Regional Public Health Neither support or oppose
Not stated
FS26/114 South Wairarapa District Council Support AllowFS85/212 Carterton District Council Support in
partAllow in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 114 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
FS53/020 Beef and Lamb NZ Support AllowS367/114 Masterton District Council Rule R80:
Discharge of treated wastewater - restricted discretionary activity
Oppose Delete Rule R80, and rewrite in conjunction with rewrite of Rule R79 [submission point s367/113].
Accept in part
/S367/115 Masterton District Council Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Neither support or oppose
Clarification that the consideration of human health impacts and reverse sensitivity effects have been fully considered.
Accept in part
/S367/116 Masterton District Council Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated That the following changes by made to Rule R89:(c)(i) ...on a property that is over 20ha 4ha, or(d)(ii) ...50m 20m of a surface water body...Delete R89(h) (GPS location and mapping) in its entirety
Reject
FS74/291 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowFS71/143 Horticulture NZ Support Allow
S368/014 Richard Tosswill Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S368/019 Richard Tosswill Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 115 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S368/020 Richard Tosswill Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S368/037 Richard Tosswill Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S368/038 Richard Tosswill Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S368/040 Richard Tosswill Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S369/014 Richard Wilkie Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S369/019 Richard Wilkie Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S369/020 Richard Wilkie Rule R90: Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that Accept in partSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 116 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
/S369/037 Richard Wilkie Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S369/038 Richard Wilkie Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S369/040 Richard Wilkie Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S370/053 Mahaki Holdings Ltd Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Amend Amend R82 to provide for "best practice" and "to avoid wherever practicable" when undertaking aerial top-dressing.
Accept in part
/S371/047 George Ritchie Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 117 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S371/052 George Ritchie Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S371/053 George Ritchie Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S371/070 George Ritchie Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S371/071 George Ritchie Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S371/073 George Ritchie Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S372/047 Leo Vollebregt Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S372/052 Leo Vollebregt Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. RejectSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 118 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S372/053 Leo Vollebregt Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Reject
/S372/070 Leo Vollebregt Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S372/071 Leo Vollebregt Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S372/073 Leo Vollebregt Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S373/014 Jamie Falloon Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S373/019 Jamie Falloon Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 119 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S373/020 Jamie Falloon Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S373/037 Jamie Falloon Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S373/038 Jamie Falloon Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S373/040 Jamie Falloon Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S373/051 Jamie Falloon Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Allow current use. Accept in part
/S373/052 Jamie Falloon Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Amend Allow current use. Accept in part
/S374/014 Michael Taylor Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 120 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S374/019 Michael Taylor Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S374/020 Michael Taylor Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S374/037 Michael Taylor Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S374/038 Michael Taylor Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S374/040 Michael Taylor Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S375/047 Graeme Hugh Tulloch Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 121 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S375/052 Graeme Hugh Tulloch Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S375/053 Graeme Hugh Tulloch Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S375/070 Graeme Hugh Tulloch Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S375/071 Graeme Hugh Tulloch Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S375/073 Graeme Hugh Tulloch Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S376/014 James Falloon Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 122 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S376/019 James Falloon Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S376/020 James Falloon Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
FS53/030 Beef and Lamb NZ Support AllowS376/037 James Falloon Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S376/038 James Falloon Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S376/040 James Falloon Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S377/047 Donald McCreary Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S377/052 Donald McCreary Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. RejectSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 123 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S377/053 Donald McCreary Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S377/070 Donald McCreary Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S377/071 Donald McCreary Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S377/073 Donald McCreary Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S378/047 Lewis Herrick Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S378/052 Lewis Herrick Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 124 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S378/053 Lewis Herrick Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S378/070 Lewis Herrick Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S378/071 Lewis Herrick Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S378/073 Lewis Herrick Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S378/079 Lewis Herrick Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
Reject
/S378/081 Lewis Herrick Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 125 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
FS25/042 Wellington Water Limited Oppose DisallowS378/082 Lewis Herrick Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
/S378/083 Lewis Herrick Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
/S379/014 Clayton Hartnell Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S379/019 Clayton Hartnell Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S379/020 Clayton Hartnell Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S379/037 Clayton Hartnell Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 126 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S379/038 Clayton Hartnell Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S379/040 Clayton Hartnell Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S380/047 Willy and Sally Bosch Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S380/052 Willy and Sally Bosch Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S380/053 Willy and Sally Bosch Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S380/070 Willy and Sally Bosch Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S380/071 Willy and Sally Bosch Rule R91: Offal Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven Accept in partSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 127 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
pit - permitted activity
other conditions to focus on clear effects.
/S380/073 Willy and Sally Bosch Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S386/014 Shane and Geoff Wilkinson Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S386/019 Shane and Geoff Wilkinson Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S386/020 Shane and Geoff Wilkinson Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S386/037 Shane and Geoff Wilkinson Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S386/038 Shane and Geoff Wilkinson Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 128 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S386/040 Shane and Geoff Wilkinson Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S387/014 Pip Wilkinson Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S387/019 Pip Wilkinson Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S387/020 Pip Wilkinson Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S387/037 Pip Wilkinson Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S387/038 Pip Wilkinson Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 129 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S387/040 Pip Wilkinson Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S388/047 Gerard Vollebregt Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S388/052 Gerard Vollebregt Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S388/053 Gerard Vollebregt Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S388/070 Gerard Vollebregt Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S388/071 Gerard Vollebregt Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S388/073 Gerard Vollebregt Rule R82: Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser Accept in partSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 130 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
application.
/S389/014 Jeremy Bennill Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S389/019 Jeremy Bennill Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S389/020 Jeremy Bennill Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S389/037 Jeremy Bennill Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S389/038 Jeremy Bennill Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S389/040 Jeremy Bennill Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 131 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
/S390/047 Hayden Thurston Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S390/052 Hayden Thurston Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S390/053 Hayden Thurston Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S390/070 Hayden Thurston Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S390/071 Hayden Thurston Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S390/073 Hayden Thurston Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 132 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
- permitted activity
/S391/014 Guy Didsbury Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S391/019 Guy Didsbury Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S391/020 Guy Didsbury Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S391/037 Guy Didsbury Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S391/038 Guy Didsbury Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S391/040 Guy Didsbury Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 133 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S392/047 Stewart Weatherstone Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S392/052 Stewart Weatherstone Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S392/053 Stewart Weatherstone Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S392/070 Stewart Weatherstone Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S392/071 Stewart Weatherstone Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S392/073 Stewart Weatherstone Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S393/047 Blair Roberts Rule R83: Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond RejectSummary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to Land
Page 134 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S393/052 Blair Roberts Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S393/053 Blair Roberts Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S393/070 Blair Roberts Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S393/071 Blair Roberts Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S393/073 Blair Roberts Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S394/047 Owen Butcher Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 135 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S394/052 Owen Butcher Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S394/053 Owen Butcher Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S394/070 Owen Butcher Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S394/071 Owen Butcher Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S394/073 Owen Butcher Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S395/047 Daniel George Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land -
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 136 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
controlled activity consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S395/052 Daniel George Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S395/053 Daniel George Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S395/070 Daniel George Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S395/071 Daniel George Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S395/073 Daniel George Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S396/047 Bernie George Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 137 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
/S396/052 Bernie George Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S396/053 Bernie George Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S396/070 Bernie George Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S396/071 Bernie George Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S396/073 Bernie George Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S397/014 Mike McCreary Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 138 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S397/019 Mike McCreary Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S397/020 Mike McCreary Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S397/037 Mike McCreary Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S397/038 Mike McCreary Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S397/040 Mike McCreary Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
/S398/012 Atiawa ki Whakarongotai Objective O46:
Discharges to land
Support [Retain objectives O46-O49 and O51] Accept
/S398/024 Atiawa ki Whakarongotai 5.3.7 Vertebrate
toxic agentsSupport Retain notification requirement Accept
/S398/025 Atiawa ki Whakarongotai Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Support [Retain Rule R89 - R91], in particular that there is no burning of the contents of farm refuse dumps
Accept
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 139 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
FS74/297 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Support AllowS398/037 Atiawa ki Whakarongotai Objective O49:
Wastewater discharges to land
Support [Retain] Accept in part
/S399/047 Sandy Bidwell Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S399/052 Sandy Bidwell Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S399/053 Sandy Bidwell Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S399/070 Sandy Bidwell Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S399/071 Sandy Bidwell Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S399/073 Sandy Bidwell Rule R82:
Application of Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser
application.Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 140 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
/S400/047 Mike Moran Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S400/052 Mike Moran Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S400/053 Mike Moran Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S400/070 Mike Moran Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
/S400/071 Mike Moran Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S400/073 Mike Moran Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 141 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
aerial application - permitted activity
/S401/014 Joe Hintz Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Oppose Undertake more rigorous regional cost-benefit analysis of pond storage and sealing requirements. Provide reasonable timeframes and a stepped approach for the installation of storage (eg 3-5 years). Clarify the definition of ponding; and exclude extreme weather events, breakdowns out of manager's control, be consistent with urban conditions. In groundwater protection areas, undertake a risk analysis to support a controlled rule rather than discretionary. Extend consent timeframe to 20 years to reflect investment made.
Reject
/S401/019 Joe Hintz Silage Oppose Change definition to specify this does not include baleage. Reject
/S401/020 Joe Hintz Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete requirement for impermeable lining; retain condition that there be no discharge to water. Delete requirement for location not allowed within 20m of a surface water body.
Accept in part
/S401/037 Joe Hintz Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
FS74/304 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS401/038 Joe Hintz Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) and condition (h). Heavily prune the seven other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Accept in part
/S401/040 Joe Hintz Rule R82:
Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application.
Accept in part
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 142 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
activity/
S404/037 J.Q and P.M Donald Rule R89: Farm refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the fourteen other conditions, particularly the 20km rule.
Reject
/S404/038 J.Q and P.M Donald Rule R91: Offal
pit - permitted activity
Oppose [Retain condition (h)]. [Require fencing of offal pits]. Accept in part
/S426/004 Beryl Masters Stuart Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
Reject
/S426/006 Beryl Masters Stuart Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
/S426/007 Beryl Masters Stuart Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
/S426/008 Beryl Masters Stuart Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 143 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S427/004 AB and DE Smith Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
Reject
/S427/006 AB and DE Smith Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
/S427/007 AB and DE Smith Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
/S427/008 AB and DE Smith Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
/S428/004 James and Jane Smallwood Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
Reject
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 144 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S428/006 James and Jane Smallwood Rule R83: Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
/S428/007 James and Jane Smallwood Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
/S428/008 James and Jane Smallwood Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
/S429/004 Blair Percy Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
Reject
/S429/006 Blair Percy Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
/S429/007 Blair Percy Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
/
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 145 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
S429/008 Blair Percy Rule R90: Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
/S430/004 Ali and Dion Kilmister Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
Reject
/S430/006 Ali and Dion Kilmister Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
/S430/007 Ali and Dion Kilmister Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
/S430/008 Ali and Dion Kilmister Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
/S431/004 Garry Daniell Rule R89: Farm Not stated [Indicate] whether farm refuse dumps are an increasing Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 146 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
refuse dumps - permitted activity
environment problem or whether the dumps have a problem in relation to groundwater and potable water for a community supply. Have community supply protection areas been identified adequately to impose restriction upon land users where there is no record established of an adverse effect occurring?
/S431/006 Garry Daniell Rule R83:
Discharge of collected animal effluent onto or into land - controlled activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (e)(iii). Reject
/S431/007 Garry Daniell Rule R89: Farm
refuse dumps - permitted activity
Amend Amend the rule by deleting condition (d)(iii). Reject
/S431/008 Garry Daniell Rule R90:
Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Amend Amend condition (d) of the rule by inserting the word "permanent" in front of 'silage storage area' as follows;(d) the walls and floor of a permanent silage storage area...Or any other equivalent change
Reject
/S434/013 New Zealand Deer Farmers
Association - Wairarapa BranchRule R82: Application of fertiliser from ground-based or aerial application - permitted activity
Oppose Amend condition (a) to reflect the practicalities of aerial fertiliser application
Accept in part
FS74/331 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose DisallowS434/014 New Zealand Deer Farmers
Association - Wairarapa BranchRule R89: Farm refuse dumps - permitted activity
Oppose Increase size from 50m3 to 100m3. Heavily prune the 14 other conditions to focus on clear effects.
Reject
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 147 of 148
Submission point
Further submission point
Submitter Provision Support Oppose
Decision requested Panel decision
/S434/015 New Zealand Deer Farmers
Association - Wairarapa BranchRule R91: Offal pit - permitted activity
Oppose Retain condition (a) re: only containing dead matter from the property and condition (h) odour is not offensive beyond the boundary. Heavily prune the other seven conditions to focus on effects
Reject
/S434/016 New Zealand Deer Farmers
Association - Wairarapa BranchSilage Oppose Change the definition of silage to specify this does not include
baleageReject
/S434/017 New Zealand Deer Farmers
Association - Wairarapa BranchRule R90: Manufacture and storage of silage and compost - permitted activity
Oppose Delete the requirement for impermeable lining; retain the condition that there be no discharge to water
Reject
FS74/332 Rangitāne o Wairarapa Inc Oppose Disallow
Summary Table of Decisions on the Proposed Natural Resources Plan: Topic – Discharges to LandPage 148 of 148