,

PNL-SA-2396 1

DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION AT FORT DRUM, NEW YORK

P. R. Armstrong D. R. Dixon E. E. Richman S. E. Rowley'")

December 1994

Presented at the World Energy Engineering Conference December 7-9, 1994 Atlanta, Georgia

Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830

Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352

(a) Fort Drum, New York

DISCLAIMER

Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. images are produced from the best available original document.

,

Peter R. Armstrong Douglas R. Dixon Eric E. Richman

Pacific Northwest Laboratory

Stephen E. Rowley Fort Dnun

ABSTBACT

the U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM) bar ideatificd presa~ vpluc savings of M y 547 million in coat+ffdve mergy consmptionmeasur# (eCMa) at Fort Drum, New York. with Bssoclpted ' corn of more than $16 million (1992 S), the measurea provide a net prtoentvaluc of S30.6 million for dl identified projects. By implamating all oort-effktive ECMn, Fort Drum can reduce its annual ~ y r g y UIC by more than 230,OOO MBtu (11% of b f d OonoUmptiOn) and more than 27,000 Mwb (32% of b dectzic arcrgy ooasumption). The annual coot of eacrgy Scnrictr ariIl duxease by S2.8 d l h n

ThroughthcFsciIityEacrgyDu5ahnScnaun . gCFEDs)p-.

(20%) at C I u l U l t energy raru.

1

ECXP funding is provided for utf ia implancating mtrgy conauvationprojcctr in new fpcility wustmAm. It k intmdai for large prajectr d g s300Il

.- I 3 R l

f ClO- - z

FIGURE 1. FORT DRUM CONSERVATION SUPPLY CURVE

2

TADLE 1. LEC THRESHOLDS AND SAVINGS

Enagy

( M w w J DSM Mcuurc u c svmgr- C&

crch cumui biucnrtlonVoltpgeRCdUCLiOn 9.01 740 740 ~3 CombinedDaunpmdRnone 0.29 850 1390 x3 Peak shoviag 0.44 55500 7,090 Pl Down-sivdLiftPump 0.66 34 7,124 w2 SwitchShopESuiorBayLight 1.13 158 7,282 06 Two+ccd Moton 1.42 3200 10,482 M2 E ; r t e r i o r ~ t o C P 1-73 124 10,606 L7 IacMdcrcartto CF (on-po.tAF€€l 1.79 2160 12,766 L10 Mercury sheet Lights to HPS 2.04 227 12,993 x4 Encrg~-Ef&iicnc Litt Pump M o m 2.86 4.2 12,997 W1 OccupPnoy-a 3.00 4ooo 16,997 08 Two-!Spccd Lift Pump Motor 3.05 10.7 17,008 W3 LargeIncPndcrccnttoHPS 3.44 456 17,464 L2 Interior incandescent ro CF 3.50 2400 19,864 Ls

UpgradeFluonsccnts(commacial) 3.84 7160 27,024 L1 ExitSignrtoLED 4.50 IO10 3,034 L4 AFHAtticInsulation 4.88 98 28,132 E7

(commercini)

u p ~ e F i u o ~ t a ( o n - p s t 5.0s 120 2822 L9 AFH) Mercury street Lights to Hps 5.20 33 28,285 L3 C O 2 - B a o c d V ~ n Control 5-40 270 3,555 V3 Efficient Motors 6.48 450 29,005 M1 upgrademuortoccntr(off-port 6.54 160 29,165 L9 AFH) Incanderceatr to CF (off-p~st AFH) 7.11 1690 30,855 L11 Efhcicnt Transformers @OF) 8.12 925 31,780 TI Power F a r Correction 8.15 20 31,800 T2 Refiigmt4xs 11.52 2160 33,960 R1 window AJC l2.65 19 33,979 AI c P = o a m p r r i ~ BOP=rcpLccrmf& APH-Anayfrrmly luNullg; lies-- & iaqll- LED=li@ . dill&

113, and a rimpt: pyback (PB) of 1.06 YM. Tho rtcod project L UI up@ of cxzcrior clltrrocc lighting at S24.3K. SIR of 4.33, and PB of 2.74 y a n . Tb. 1994 project ia a change to higb-prerrum uvthtm 0 cxtcrhr lighting at 560.9iG SIR of 3.2% Md PB oi 3.64 yam. Twa8ty4m ptojecrr hvcboca rubmatodto thc fullding V r u r o a i r b d ~ m Tab& 2 for fircrl yeu 1995.

TABLE 2. FY 1995 DSM PROJECT PROPOSALS

Upgrado fluozwwa? lighwp 970.5 -14.839 fimuer Up@ thraccnt lighting- 981 -u,000 Gmua Upgrade b m lighting- 1013.7 -15~oO t%tulw Upgrade fluorrrccat Iighthg- 1046.4 -16,000 ~ ~ I U U

fit^ exit 189.1

OccupPnoy rcaron-lprge 1556.9 lightrWithLEDa

Occupurcyrrcarorwmpll 333.3 officer, daynmrm, bothroom HVACupgmdc:sdback 269 T-stat,iasulpteatticr Expand EMCS-P173,174, 711 175 banacks mmplex SclCctedLightingproj~ 246 New & Old Post HestrCVlyBtEMCS 24 cxpnaion in W b x Clinic @uildig P-36) RcpairHT%Wdist&ution 298

mom

2.39 4.75

2.39 4.7s

2.39 4.75

2.39 4.75

8.34 1.97

2.39 4.7

3.57 3.14

3.37 4.85

3.48 3.43

2.08 6.93

3.6 2.53

3.92 4.39

Convert P10785,10790 38 5.23 3.31 fmmHTHWtogan warehowlighting 204.9 225 5-02

Wiadow8twallintulPtion- 17U TBD P173,174,17S brkr complex

3

4

Eachdurcrrqukadi&rcntvtrificPtiondup. Thcdata applicabltto each cnd use involvcd in tbc pibtphascofthe Foxt Dnun imphcntAon arc pnrcatcd bcbw. End-uoc sampling raterwillbcasaeased,basedon bntint;nl and c o S t - e ~ V e n ~

tedo applied to the pibt phase dprr, and appropriately rcviocd sampling rates applied to Rlbrequmt phaocr of thc implementation. (However, moat of the pibt phase automatic metering equipment will be kit active regazdlerr becausc the cost per unit data from existing autonomour loggg. i8 low.)

Lightiag data collection procedurrr include the following:

number or other ducnptlan that unyucly d c i i u locPlron,, Rccard and certify rcplac~ment/rar~ti& for each cwting f i . Rccord timeclock paramaen for a c h circuit contmllcd by a time Clock.

Motor vcrificadon data will be collccttd aa follows:

(100%) audit - Record motor nameplate dah, quantity, and application by buikiig repl p m p c r c y facility number); rtcord and cenify new mator data for a c h existing motor that ir nplocat. Make ollotimc power and power h r mcuurcmcnt for a c h 2-hp or brga motor t a r g d for rcpipccmtnt by a two-gpccd motor and of each 5-hp or larger motor targeted for nplacantnt by an energy-e&knt motor. Thir mcoouranent will suppoa motor downsizing, which is expected to nult in signiiicant additional energy saving not addressed in the high-hd murct assessment project 131. Record hours of UIC repoxted by building monitor, heating shop, or aerw engineer designee. Alw break out motor inventory by circuit for tbc buildings where diner merrsurrmcntir to bcpcrformed (0.5% of all motors in the project). A sample motor retrofit cgtificatio n report is prrreatedinFigure4.

(5%) in- meanurancnt- Install NII-timc me%m (note that two-spctd motor rcquinr two mn-timc meters) to determine savings in one (or more) of each prototypical building and othabuildinga scktedby stratitied spmplingpian. Use same buildinga that have lighting loggers to the maximum practical exteat. A samplc motor run-timC and load mcasuraneat npoa k pntentcdin Figun 5.

5

FIGURE 2. LIGHTING AUDlT (MEASURED PRE/POST LOAD; ESTIMATED HOURS) DATA FORMAT

1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I

FIGURE 3. MOTOR INDIRECT MEASUREIMENT (MEASURED PRE/POST LOAD; CLOCKED HOURS) DATA FORMAT

(ID &Application columna as shown in W g u n 2 ; not repeated here)

Note: Usc taro liner for Z-qccd motrm (rpm kW, kVA and IS data).

Site ID: Auditor: company:

t-

FIGURE 4. MOTOR AUDm (MEASURED PRElpoST LOAD; ESTIMATED HOURS) DATA FORMAT

I I 1 i I i I I I I 1 1 I I I

t I I i i I I I I I I I I L

FIGURE 5. MOTOR INDIRECT MEASUREMENT (MEASURED PRE/posT LOAD, c u ) C m HOURS) DATA FORMAT

(ID & Appiicttion coiumnn PI shown in Figure 4; not rrptrrtcd htn)

6

indirrcc mcuurcmcnt b k a wiU be pcn-onned by thc ESCO, utility, or other utility mntRCU)r. PNL wiU provdc uvlit fbrrmtr. Sample selection wilt invoiva collaboration of pNL. k utility, and the Fort. Fort Drum will provide QC wirh mJL ruppoa9

Moat of thc direct cnd-w rnessumnmt tpskr orc bcing performed by PNL. Additional direct meaouremart m y be performed by the ESCO, utility, or other utility contraaor. PNL i~ providing mouitoring protocolr'o and dw formats. SMpIe selection will be reviewed by PNL, the utiiity, and thc Parr.

Total energy mearurcmcnt at the fccdcr b e l will be p a h d by PNL. Fort D m will perform thenmi loop monitoring. Instdlation of, and dowdoadimg from, wholebuildiig pulpe ncordmwill be performed by the Fort or the utility.

Fort D m will provide QC of unit load a d d . Fort Drum will also maintain s h w n e d metering quipmart aad will coatiauC to collect meter. building deactivation, M y housing Y.CBILC~, and stnilar popuhion, operations, and building inventory data.

BASELINE MODELING Daily sircwidc energy conoumption ia cunmrly monitoIcd for electric, gas, and high-tempcnrturt hot wotcr 0 .cnice. (Fuel 02 aad coal uac axe recorded by dciivery only.) Daily tomi radiation, air tanpcratun, sol-& tempcnrtun, and wind Hpcod are racordcd wniinuousiy. BuiLdig activation and dacdvptioa are recorded to the neartst day. S i population a d o m p n c y by building arc monitored with monthly resolution. Tbae data make daytypo sad Wtathanormaliztd unpixicai modcling fau- iblc. p d i m h l y rtruitrhmnaturalgaaurcmodding;ur: discupMdbc1ow. Occupancy-no makdontgmrwillbeaddcd to the mod& as data beixmc avaiiabk.

7

--- I

2-

I o

E

3 500

f

0

FIGURE 6. DAIL.Y SITE GAS USE VERSUS DAILY AVERAGETEMPERATURE

200 8 : 3 100 Y

b

- i o -1 00 H i 3 -200

0 I

FIGURE 7. RESIDUAL TIME SERIES W R LINEAR GAS VERSUS (T.S) MODEL

3 Y & too t w

e B o 1-100 -

0 . ui

$-*OO-. i

FIGURE 8. RESIDUALS AFl'ER TIMESERIES MODELING

nter (miliion cubic fdday) to facilitafe ampprison with Figurc 8. Thcwcckly modclesimata of gas m n s ~ n ~ ~ t o &h from measured gas consumption much lesi than the daily tstimatcr, and the monthly model cstknatcr arcseento dcviatc CVQl h. Thia ia fortllitour bccauscit ia g e n d y t h e U m U d

Occ-y-, weather-, and building stock-nomralized energy uae thatiaofhtcrcsttothcpPrricipPntr. Useofadoilymodcl provider, in eff" a large spmple size. ThC dcviadoa (fium tbc trucvaillt) of the mean of n = 365 daily saving numbar will be, an the average, about ondwcnhdh ' of thc deviation of a single daily savings numbet. Thc variances shown in Figm 9 bear out thc theoretical expcdntionthotmeur-equpnddevietion ia pportionalto l/n.

FIGURE 9. MODEL ERROR REDUCTION BY TIME AGGIZEGAnON

8

LCC = w(Iq + Pv(Ec) + W(0M) + W O

Lcvelizcd cacrgy cost (LEC) ir the effective or bLnded e ~ g y price at which a corucrvaeion, effichcy, ramdie, 01 he& witching measure btcornu coat-effcctivc (NNPv > = 0). Tbw, a project’s LEC is given by

W(LEC*EUS) = PV(0MS) + PV(REPS) - WQ

Savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) is the total (w) savings of a measure divided by its imtaiho * ncost

2. In the case of Fort Dnun’s Servicing eiectric utiliry, NMPC, aDSM subrcribcris definedas a commerciatcustomerwho has elcct#5 to forego standard NMPC DSM program benefits. Sub- scribcn sue wed under a modified rate that eliminater the DRAM Charge (- SO.o[)2kWh); tht utility may still bc imroived in DSM implementation but implementation coat is boracdinctly by the customer.

3. As motivation to implement energy efficiawy, one-thid of savings is ruaincd by thc site for additional energy p g r a m a and onc-third is rc%ained for mode, weike, and ncrtation @WR) programre

4. It is possible for the new catimottto be icm BCCUR~C, e v a

fixture countesmn and how of operation errors are large but opposite in sign in such a way that they hrgdy d

though the new iixauc count data arc more BccuIBtc, ifthc oL1

6. In thh context, thc change in average Ioad resulting from DSM imp- . n is the signalof intucstand the change due to all otba Cffcctr is the n o k

9

ACKNOWLEDGMENT Tht Pacific Northwest Laboratory ir oprakd by Eattde Memorial hatihue for the U.S. Dcpaamcat of Encrgy undtr Contaact DE-AC0676RLO 1830.

REFERENCES Dixon, D. R, P. R Armotrong, and K. K Datllenboch. 1993. Fort Drum htegrated ResonrceAssusmmt- Volrmrs I: Errcrrxve slonmray. -24 Vol. 1, pacifio Northweot Laboratory, Richlpad, Was&ington.

Dixon, D. R, P. R Armstrong, J. R Brcdrick, K. K. Daeihbach, F. V. DiMassr, I. M. IWer, E. E. Richman, G. P. Sullivan, and R R WPhlPtrom. 1992. Fort Drum Iiuepated Resource Asrrrmunr - Volronr 2 Baseline Detail. PNL-8424 VoL 2, Pacitlc Norshwest Labonrtory, Richland, Washington.

Dixon, D. R, P. R Armstmng. K K Doellenbpch, J. E. DagkF. V.DiMa.?ua,D. B . E l l i o q J . M . K e k , E . E . Richman, S. A. shmkle, G. P. Sullivan, and R R Wahbmrn. 1992. F a D m Inrcgmrrd Resonme

VoL 3, pacific N o h w a t Lpborptory, RictJMd, Washington.

ASS-- V O ~ U 3: R r s r u r ~ . A ~ - . PNL-8424

The effca of aggregation bias ia low due to homogeneity within building typcr and thc nlntive aacofaggmpingwithin. but wt acmsa, budding typa.

10

R e h d w k - effcctr are vcry low because occupsncrdo not pay the utiliticr; only a s d map-backeKxt

paid for at the rate of savings based on eagiaecring crtimater that Prsumcthcseeffectrarezao,ithelongtam,~of Executiva Ordcr p u r e [M] d continued tracking. Additionai effcctlr may occur, hwcr, if occupants raxt ta a

is e*pcctcd at the O o d level bacplucmcaounrhavc to bc

pcrocived low levci of srvifx.

[A21 Executive order 12902. March 8, 1994. "Energy Efticieacy and Water Conservation at Federal Fadities.' Fuierd Register VoL 59, No. 047.

11