PMS

236
Performance Management Important Information Performance management is a strategic tool used to promote an effective organization. It ensures that individual employees’ efforts are focused on the priorities and strategies set out in the corporate and departmental business plans. It directs efforts towards effectiveness and away from merely being busy. The success of employees depends on a clear performance management process, which recognizes the accomplishments and supports the professional development of Nova Scotia’s public service employees. There are two distinct, but similar, performance management processes in the Nova Scotia Government: one for MCP employees and one for BU/AS employees. If you have questions regarding your performance management responsibilities or what type of performance management process you fall under, contact your manager or OD&E Senior Consultant at the Nova Scotia Public Service Commission. The Performance Management Cycle

Transcript of PMS

Page 1: PMS

Performance Management

Important Information Performance management is a strategic tool used to promote an effective organization. It ensures that

individual employees’ efforts are focused on the priorities and strategies set out in the corporate and departmental business plans. It directs efforts towards effectiveness and away from merely being

busy.

The success of employees depends on a clear performance management process, which recognizes

the accomplishments and supports the professional development of Nova Scotia’s public service employees.

There are two distinct, but similar, performance management processes in the Nova Scotia Government: one for MCP employees and one for BU/AS employees.

If you have questions regarding your performance management responsibilities or what type of performance management process you fall under, contact your manager or OD&E Senior Consultant

at the Nova Scotia Public Service Commission.

The Performance Management Cycle

Performance Management Resources View by Activity View Employee Type (BU/AS/MCP) Tips & Tricks

Page 2: PMS

Performance Management ResponsibilitiesManagers ensure that each employee knows what is expected in terms of performance and

professional development. They manage towards successful outcomes for both the employee and the organization. Managers are responsible for coaching employees and giving feedback based upon

goals set at the beginning of the performance cycle. As well, together, managers and employees review progress periodically throughout the year and formally at the end of the cycle.

Employees are responsible for their own performance, are in charge of their own career development and should take the initiative to be successful. The performance management process helps them do

this by linking the business plan with their individual responsibilities and helps them focus on what needs to be done and how it needs to be done.

If you need help with performance management, contact your HR representative or Karen Meins (902-424-4271).

Sustained Human Capital (page 5/6)

Page 3: PMS

Page123456

LeadershipWe recognise leadership as a primary focus of our organisational development. Our interventions include formal executive coaching at Exco and senior management level, formal business school programmes and management training modules.

In 2007 we developed an integrated training programme divided into four levels of leadership. The programme focuses on the implementation of our 2010 strategy, but with emphasis on teamwork and holistic, big-picture thinking. We also invested in executive coaching for our top 60 managers (including Exco members), positively addressing our leadership style through a 360-degree review and simulation processes.

InductionWe introduced a completely revised induction process from the beginning of 2007. All staff now begin their induction at the head office in Cape Town, where they meet the leadership, get to understand the brand, the company’s values, and why our company is the best place for them to realise their aspirations.

Performance ManagementWe have a structured Performance management system that sets specific objectives and measures performance achievement while identifying development opportunities. This enables the company to develop individuals, identify potential, reward performance, improve productivity and create a performance culture.

With the rollout of our Broker Management Model Programme (BMMP) and the adoption of our new values, it became opportune to review our Performance management systems and procedures across the country. A survey was undertaken resulting in the revamp of the Performance management system and processes – with emphasis placed on the training and re-skilling of staff. Performance training started in 2007 and around 70% of staff have already been trained.

Page 4: PMS

Training for Brokers and IntermediariesWe provide internal training and work with our business partners through operational and product training (approximately 12 000 brokers and intermediaries participate per year). As short-term insurance products become more specialised and complex, we develop more sophisticated training tools, including an emphasis on video-based training, making use of visual examples to bring home the intentions of, and opportunities presented by, our various products.

Top 10 HR Tips For beating the recessionA survey of HR directors and business leaders by recruitment firm The MBS Group has produced

what it calls 'Ten tactics for tough times'.

Page 5: PMS

Those involved in the research were all at board or senior management level, within the retail,

luxury, and consumer goods sectors. How useful these tactics actually are is open to debate, but

they provide a useful barometer of the current thinking taking place in top firms.

Tactics For Tough Times

1. Ride the storm - preparing for difficult times but not currently planning large scale layoffs.

Leaders of consumer, retail, leisure, and luxury industries are wisely shying away from kneejerk

staff cuts or talking about culls of more mature staff. This reflects an innovative and creative

approach to talent that other sectors would do well to observe.

2. See upside in downturn - the best business leaders see opportunities in turmoil.

Business leaders are focusing on the future, aiming to find new opportunities and disrupt existing

markets with innovation, based on consumer insights.

3. Show me the value - rapid response and appropriate price promotion are working for some.

‘Extreme value propositions’ are working well with increasingly cost-conscious consumers. In an

effort to grab market share, a race downmarket is developing, to capture consumer spending

power with a ‘best-price’ message.

4. Pocket returns in pockets of growth - some sectors are positively booming, such as online,

home entertainment and some luxury brands.

Online business continues to defy gravity. The results seem to indicate a ‘digital divide’ between

companies who have older business models and those who have successfully incorporated e-

commerce and new technology platforms. The latter are now benefiting from this shift in

consumer behaviour.

Page 6: PMS

5. Refocus on emerging markets - opportunities in Asia are attracting increased attention and

investment whilst Europe and the US flounder.

Many respondents indicated that they are refocusing their businesses on the significant growth

opportunities in the Middle East and Asia and, to a lesser extent, Eastern Europe.

6. Keep up with customers - businesses must find a way to match or exceed customers'

increasingly agile changes in behaviour.

Customers’ behaviour is changing faster than businesses are able to shift their strategies.

Consumer loyalty is not surviving the challenge of great deals and people are defecting to (own)

brands that previously they would not have considered.

7. Hang on to talent - attracting the best talent is increasingly vital, but also becoming

increasingly difficult.

Business leaders are not planning for the large-scale lay-offs that happened in previous

recessions. Instead, they are focusing on whether they have the skills and talent to take them

through the downturn. They recognise that it will be increasingly difficult to attract the best new

talent into their organisations.

8. Empower your people - business leaders are recognising the value of experience, while also

ensuring that their people have the right skills and training in place to survive and prepare for the

upturn.

Internally, the focus is on having the right strategies in place to retain the best people, as well as

managing under-performers in a tougher way. Incentives are being adapted to reflect these

changed priorities.

9. Keep up morale - maintaining workforce morale will be a decisive benefit.

Businesses reported that they are redoubling efforts to demonstrate decisive leadership via more

internal communication. For example, several companies are making increasing use of face-to-

Page 7: PMS

face communication to increase the CEO’s visibility, to set the right tone and convince employees

that their jobs are safe. They recognise the need to avoid the creation of a bunker mentality within

their businesses and build employee confidence and trust in their leadership.

10. Engage your staff - keep staff members on your side.

A high proportion of our survey respondents recognised that full employee engagement is needed

to be able to shift strategy successfully. A minority of companies cited examples of the impact

that this can have.

Ref: http://www.personneltoday.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/40472

Cost effective Hiring and Successful retention in the corporate world is very essential today. For this reason companies are working on the areas of recruitment & retention to get more insights on the same. Some of the key findings are:

. Knowing the generation Y better will improve an organisation's chances of recruiting and

retaining them

. But to know them organisations must move beyond perusing documented information.

The better you know your prospective candidates the better the chances of luring them. The logic

is that simple. There is already a lot that organisations know about generation Yers. However, if

the intention is to recruit more from this generation, the question to ask is, "What more can we

learn about them?" The answer is critical to formulating an effective strategy-one that ensures a

competitive edge.

This week's mailer will clue in organisations and their recruiters on the characteristics and quirks

of generation Yers. This information should help them realign their existing strategy to recruit

successfully and retain them.

Defining the 'Y' cadre

Commonly referred to as "Millennials", "Echo Boomers" and "Net Generation", generation Y

constitutes those who were born from 1980 to 1999 and grew up in the 1990s and 2000s. A few

well-documented and work-relevant characteristics of this generation are:

. They are more ambitious than the previous generation so much that sociologists call them the

overachieving, overscheduled generation

Page 8: PMS

. They like changing jobs, and earned the title "job-hoppers"

. They have great expectations from their workplace as, according to research, "they desire to

shape their jobs to fit their lives rather than adapt their lives to the workplace". This outlook is a

huge challenge to employers.

The above-mentioned characteristics are well-documented. In fact, most organisations have

already realigned their recruitment strategies around them. But there are a few other quirks that

are not so well documented but can have an equally huge impact on an organisation's strategy.

They are:

Trait: Dependence on parents

Being the products of helicopter parenting, generation Yers find it difficult to wean off parents.

This generation does not think much of moving back home after college. Less rebellious than

their predecessors, most of them even let their parents decide on where they will work and for

whom. That this generation job-hops is a well known fact, but what is undocumented is that their

job-hopping is driven by the will to learn. Encouraged by their parents' advice to learn and grow

from different experiences, the generation is willing to risk job security and fantastic salaries for

the thrill of learning something new. Also the fact that they can fall back on their parents makes

them greater risk-takers than their predecessors.

Tip: In getting the Yers to make career decisions, give them time to consult their parents.

Encourage them to make those phone calls to their parents from the interview room itself.

Page 9: PMS

Trait: In-box management

It might not appear as an advantage, but the fact that Yers choose to start their work day without

a 'to-do' list actually makes them better 'prioritisers'. As a behavioural expert comments, "Baby

boomers use their in-boxes and in-trays as to-do lists and go by them on a typical work day.

However, Gen Y is sold on the idea of an 'empty box'". This means that what they do is not

dictated by what comes into their in-box or in-tray but by what they feel is important. This gives

them better control in deciding their priorities and also makes them conscious of managing their

work activities based on priorities. In short, they do not work on a first-in, first-out basis but on the

"most important comes first" basis.

Tip: Allow Yers the leeway to plan their day. Strict scheduling can frustrate them.

Trait: Women power

Yers appreciate gender equality and have little qualms about women surging ahead as earners.

Generation Y women feel more empowered, go solo in making career and personal decisions,

and feel less insecure at work. Another observation is that women take a back seat voluntarily

when they decide to have children.

Tip: Think of flexible work hours and work-at-home options for new mothers.

Trait: Team spirit

Generation Yers thrive as teams. Probably the first generation to value the importance of team

power, this generation appreciates how individual efforts at work multiply when combined with

team efforts. So oriented are their efforts to work in teams that team-building and bonding

initiatives are only reminders of what they already appreciate. Therefore, where they really need

help is in developing their leadership potential.

Tip: Divide everyone into work teams. Even a one-employee function or department can be

integrated into a large group.

Some of this information is probably already known but not accounted for as yet. However, what

is essential is to be aware of these undocumented generational differences. Organisations must

interpret this information to use it as a recruitment advantage.

Effectiveness of the Human Resources Function

The purpose of a Human Resources audit is to assess the effectiveness of the Human Resources function and to ensure regulatory compliance. The audit can be conducted by anyone with sufficient Human Resources experience. Having experience working in more than one company is a plus, as it provides the auditor with a broader perspective. There's an advantage to having the audit conducted by an external consultant. Because the external consultant has fewer biases about the organization and has less personal interest in the outcome than an employee of the

Page 10: PMS

company, the external consultant may be more objective.

Collect Data

Assess the mission, vision, strategy, and culture of the organization, from whatever written material there is in the company (check with the department or person who handles public, customer, or shareholder relations). Collect existing data such as:1. Hiring statistics (acceptance rate, hiring rate, hiring projections) 2. Turnover 3. Compensation and benefits philosophy and practice 4. Exit interview summaries 5. Employee complaints (discrimination, harassment, safety, other) 6. Promotion and advancement practices and trends 7. Human Resources budget and expenditures Where possible, compare the data you collected with market data. This information will provide

you with a point of view for the next phase of the audit: the interviews. If, during the interview,

discrepancies arise between the data and the interviewee's answer, you can explore the reasons

for the discrepancy(s).

Conduct Interviews

The purpose of the interview is to collect input from the internal customer on their Human

Resources needs and how those needs are being met. Begin the interview with top management.

Next conduct interviews with a sample of subordinate managers including first line management.

The topics to discuss during the interview include:

1. Perceptions of the company and its goals 2. Strengths and weaknesses of top management 3. Employee perceptions of the company and top management 4. Relations with subordinates 5. Support of career goals for self and employees 6. Major Human Resources issues 7. Which Human Resources functions work well 8. Which Human Resources functions need improvement

Conduct the Regulatory Compliance Audit

The following areas should be audited as part of the regulatory compliance audit:

1. Personnel files and recordkeeping (contain only job related information) 2. Pay equity 3. Job descriptions (ADA compliance) 4. Legal postings 5. Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action 6. Forms (applications, internal forms, etc.) 7. Workers' Compensation 8. Fair Labor Standards Act 9. Family and Medical Leave Act

Page 11: PMS

10. Legal reporting

Summarize the Results

Consolidate the information you collected. Compare the results with market surveys. Determine

which practices are good/popular/effective/competitive. Determine which practices need

improvement. Recommend specific improvements referring to the results of both the

Effectiveness audit and the Regulatory compliance audit. Justify the recommendations.

Determine how to measure whether the improvements are successful.

Obtain Approval from senior Management

Present the preliminary results and recommendations to senior management individually. Point

out how these recommendations will support their needs. Obtain their support, then present the

final results and recommendations to the senior management staff for final approval.

Implement the Program

Consider implementing the program in part of the organization as a pilot program. Monitor and

measure success and seek to continuously improve processes. Be prepared to modify the

program if an organizational change requires it.

Effective Organizations(Organization Development)

The trend toward reducing the number of management levels in organizations is being driven by

the need of organizations to increase the speed and accuracy of communication. Traditional

organizations, with their many levels of management, process information slowly. Plus the

information gets filtered along the way, often for political reasons which can conflict with the

overall good of the organization.

Processing information quickly and accurately, then acting upon what is learned, is critical for

the success of an organization. Another key item is selecting relevant information for measuring

Page 12: PMS

organizational performance relative to organizational goals. This can be challenging in light of

today's information rich environment. (Selecting the wrong metrics, those which pull the focus of

the organization away from what is most important for its ultimate success, will harm an

organization). After selecting the appropriate metrics, organizational performance can be further

enhanced by linking the performance results to individual or team incentives.

Performance Management is a process that can facilitate the flow of information in an

organization. Performance Management includes the following:

1. A flow-down of goals beginning with the organization's strategic plan, to the annual organizational goals, to the President's or CEO's individual performance goals, on down to all employees in the organization. Thus each member of the organization can ultimately tie their individual performance goals to the organizational goals .

2. A formal feedback system in which individual performance results can ultimately flow back and influence the organization's strategic plan. Feedback must occur frequently.

3. A mutual (between the employee and manager) establishment of duties and responsibilities and criteria for measuring success. Also, performance results are mutually determined. The mutuality is what encourages the feedback.

With more than 135,000 employees working in some 80 countries worldwide, Procter & Gamble,

creator of brands such as Tide, Folgers, Pringles, Charmin and Crest, has isolated the manager-

Page 13: PMS

employee relationship as a critical component of effective performance management.

"It's the No. 1 reason why people leave a company," said Keith Lawrence, director of human

resources, beauty, health and well-being at Procter & Gamble Co. "It's such an important

relationship. It determines the work an individual is assigned, their future assignments,

promotions, compensation, as well as the basic love, care and feeding that we get each day."

In order to enable effective manager-employee relationships, Lawrence said the process must

begin with a manager's fundamental belief that a high-quality relationship with every one of his or

her employees is important.

Positive manager-employee relationships actually start when an employee joins the manager's

team or attends the company on-boarding program. On-boarding can help the two get to know

each other, identify their strengths and establish how they can work together.

To set the right tone at this stage, Lawrence said the manager should have clear work plans and

objectives for what will be accomplished in the first assignment.

Ongoing, continuous feedback - including not only what needs improvement, but recognition of

what is going well - will help reinforce the employee's contribution and build a basic feeling of

trust, respect and a sense of teamwork.

"We have a lot of systems to give feedback on an ongoing basis, but the most effective way to

give feedback is to tailor it to the individual employee," he explained. "Some employees like to get

written feedback, some like to get it in person, others like to hear all the good stuff, and you have

to soft pedal the issues. It's important for the manager to know every one of their employees and

deliver feedback as they like it delivered."

The level of personalization and trust in this manager-employee relationship is so relevant; it can

take only one incident to damage it. Saying one thing and doing another, offering inaccurate

information or not fulfilling commitments related to advancement or new opportunities for growth

and development are a few critical but common manager mistakes.

"Fundamentally, all relationships boil down to trust," Lawrence said. "The worst thing a manager

can do is make a commitment and either not deliver on it or not be honest, candid and complete

with their employee. It's very hard to rebuild trust. Stephen Covey would say you need seven

deposits in the emotional bank to account for one incident like that. In the trust fund, it's beyond

that. A manager can really blow a relationship when they're not trustworthy or when they lack

integrity."

Page 14: PMS

Procter & Gamble uses its annual employee survey to measure how well managers are building

and sustaining employee relationships. The survey has several relationship-based questions for

which answers are monitored, benchmarked and tied to manager - particularly senior managers' -

bonuses.

"That puts teeth behind the importance of this," Lawrence said. "We also have a wide range of

tools and training available to managers and employees to help their relationship building. For

example, we have a relationship-building tool kit that has an array of different exercises and

approaches that both employee and manager can use to help them strengthen their respective

relationship.

"Last, we're leaning toward what we call strength-based relationships, and the analogy here is in

a marriage, you learn to appreciate and play to each other's strengths as opposed to trying to fix

the parts you don't like. The same is true here. We're trying to focus on what are the strengths

that each employee and manager has and how can they respectively play to those over time and

build and strengthen one another."

1. The Most Important Thing Bosses Do Is Help OTHERS Succeed:

This sounds simple, but bosses got promoted because of their personal achievements. Now, they

have to shift the focus from themselves to the growth of those who report to them. In other words,

it's not about YOU, boss. It's about the troops. If they do well, you should, too.

2. Managers Cannot Treat Everyone The Same:

Great bosses learn how to customize their approach to each person. Yes, they hold true to core

values, but don't assume that they have to act in identical ways with each staffer. They manage

people as the complex individuals they are. And that's a real skill.

3. IQ Gets Bosses Only So Far; EQ Takes Them to The Next Level:

I'm talking about emotional intelligence: the ability to be self-aware, self-managing, socially aware

and adept at managing relationships. This means knowing how to read the emotions of others as

well as our own, to know how to power up or power down in synch with a situation, to build trust

through expertise, integrity and empathy.

Page 15: PMS

4. People Fall In Love With Ideas & Solutions Of Their Own Creation:

It's faster and easier to tell people what to do; but when people come up with their own ideas,

they are much more invested in them. Anyone who's ever assigned stories knows this one.

Journalists love the project they come up with more than the one that's given them. When we put

our personal stamp on something, we care more about it. This applies in work assignments,

negotiation and conflict resolution.

5. Coaching Is A Critical Skill:

Bosses who "fix" the work of others don't help them grow. Fixing may be faster, but has short-

term impact. Coaching takes more time but the results last. Fixing is about the product, coaching

is about the person. With good coaching, the person and the product improve.

6. Staffers Must See You, Not Your Evil Twin:

What's the difference between visionary and delusional, a roll-up-my-sleeves helper and a

micromanager, or between confidence and arrogance? It's often in the the way the leader

communicates and the staff perceives her. Leaders can't assume their employees can read their

minds. It's hard work to make your intentions clear.

Page 16: PMS

7. Conflict Doesn't Get Better If It Is Ignored:

The best bosses build cultures where conflict may be inevitable among smart, creative people,

but it is handled extremely well. Differences are aired, values are clear, people are held

accountable, and bullies don't win.

8. Intrinsic Motivation Is The Most Powerful:

The best work gets done when people motivate themselves. That's intrinsic motivation: Internal

engines like competence, choice, meaningfulness and progress. Or the joy of working with a

team, or achieving something solo. Great bosses know what drives each person they lead.

9. Managing Change Is A Constant Responsibility:

Change can make people very uncomfortable, but leaders must move people in new directions,

toward new opportunities. Today's newsrooms are undergoing massive changes of culture,

workflow, skill sets, formats and technology. Great leaders build bridges to the future.

10. Leaders Inspire Others:

There's meaning, honor and dignity in every form of honest work. Don't fear that you will look

corny by sharing a vision, a passion, or a dream. The best bosses make us feel better about

ourselves, our work and our goals. Dare to inspire.

Performance Management CollaborativeThe Performance Management Collaborative consists of a seven state core

including Illinois (lead state), Missouri, West Virginia, New Hampshire, New York,

Alaska, and Montana. Five additional partners include the Association of State

and Territorial Health Officers, the National Association of County and City

Health Officials, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Health

Page 17: PMS

Resources and Services Administration, and the Association of State and

Territorial Local Health Liaison Officials.

Definition of Performance Management

Performance management is the practice of actively using performance data to

improve the public's health. This practice involves strategic use of performance

measures and standards to establish performance targets and goals, to prioritize

and allocate resources, to inform managers about needed adjustments or

changes in policy or program directions to meet goals, to frame reports on the

success in meeting performance goals, and to improve the quality of public

health practice.

Performance Management components include:

Performance Standards - establishment of organizational or system

performance standards, targets and goals and relevant indicators to improve

public health practice

Performance Measures - application and use of performance indicators and

measures

Reporting of Progress - documentation and reporting of progress in meeting

standards and targets and sharing of such information through feedback

Quality Improvement - establishment of a program or process to manage

change and achieve quality improvement in public health policies, programs or

infrastructure based on performance standards, measurements and reports.

A Performance Management System is the continuous use of all the above

practices so that they are integrated into the organization's core operations.

Performance management can be carried out at multiple levels, including the

program, organization, community, and state levels.

Collaborative Products

Page 18: PMS

The Collaborative released its third

major product in March 2003, From Silos to Systems: Performance Management to Improve the Public's Health.

The Silos to Systems guide explains

and showcases examples of the

Collaborative's four-part model for

performance management, along with

helpful tips for successfully

implementing a performance

management system.

Find more Collaborative's products on

the Public Health Foundation's Web

site.

Performance mangement case studies and learnings.

Performance management

CT enables you to achieve the goal of successfully implementing performance management, instilling preferred behaviour and rewarding high performance. It is ineffective to change behaviour, one employee at a time.  With performance management methodologies we assist you to effectively increase your

Page 19: PMS

employees’ natural ability to motivate themselves, while decreasing the de-motivators in your organisation throughout.

Aligned business goals and focussed employees can result in an increase of more than 70% in efficiency. We endeavour to make performance management a practical and understandable tool for employees on all levels. The behavioural model that CT embeds in performance management follows a five- point approach:

Driving performance management will result in a long term culture change.  CT will support your business in the enabling process to ensure that the performance management process receives the required buy-in and cooperation from employees and management, and will ensure that employees and management have the skills to fully implement the process and make it work.  Support in this process is an active and dynamic communication strategy that will inform all stakeholders of the “what”, “how”, why”, and consequences of supporting the implementation of performance management within your business. 

In addition to our consulting expertise, CT has a web-based performance management system that enables your business to effectively and timeously manage employees’ performance, by providing you with a tool to develop performance agreements that are aligned with business goals, resulting in focused and performance-related development plans for every employee. It also allows for informed decision-making through extensive and detailed reporting.

Competencies

Organizational Development & Training Organizational Assessment and Gap Analysis

Page 20: PMS

New Manager Assimilation On Boarding Manager Boot Camp Situational Leadership Executive Coaching Mentoring Programs Team Development

Staffing & Recruitment

From strategic needs assessment, optimum hiring processes, and management skill building, we can ensure you are positioned to hire the best and brightest to meet the demands of your business

Tools and metrics for time-to-fill, cost-to-fill, source-of-hire, quality-of-hire, etc. to measure results

Performance Management

Page 21: PMS

Linking individual & team performance to organizational goals Strategic performance coaching packages

On Site Specialists Interim HR leadership Sexual harassment and discrimination investigations HR audit for compliance

Compensation & Benefits Salary survey participation and data analysis Administration and analysis Comprehensive benefits review and vendor management

Performance Management Beyond Budgeting: Why you should consider it, How it works, and Who should contribute to make it happen.

News categories: Enterprise and business strategy, Finance and accounting, Performance management

and controlling, Information Technology 

by Juergen H. Daum        

Table of content:IntroWhy should a company consider to move Beyond Budgeting ? How does the Beyond Budgeting model work ?Who should contribute to make it happen ?The Transition Route – Major success factorsSummaryAdditional resources (updated Jan 2005)   

Page 22: PMS

 “Fixed budgets don’t work today. A budget is a too static instrument and locks managers into the past - into something they thought last year that it was right. To be effective in a global economy with rapidly shifting market conditions and quick and nimble competitors, organization have to be able to adapt constantly their priorities and have to put their resources where they can create most value for customers and shareholders. In order to do that, they need the right concepts, management processes and tools – concepts such as the Beyond

Budgeting Management Model. The introduction of new management instruments such as the Balanced Scorecard, which help to better align the entire organization with corporate strategic objectives and to focus it on the essentials, has created the right foundation. Because if corporate strategy and the objectives are clear for all people in an organization, one can principally react faster to changing market conditions. But then the fixed budget comes into their way and prevents them from really doing the right things. Though what is often missing is a more flexible operational planning and control model. The Beyond Budgeting model wants to fill exactly this gap.”                                                     Juergen H. Daum  

New! - visit J.H.D.'s Beyond Budgeting Info Center - including latest BB insight materials, interviews with BB pioneers etc. - here an extract:| J.D.'s insight article "Beyond Budgeting" | Interview with Lennart Francke, CFO of Svenska Handelsbanken | Panel Discussion with Borealis, Nestlé, and Unilever | Interview with Jeremy Hope – co-founder of the Beyond Budgeting Round Table | Interview with J.D. on finance and IT | 

 Intro  Three years ago I presented to a group of senior executives at the headquarters of a large U.S. based consumer products company with global operations the concept of “Strategic Enterprise Management” (SEM) – a concept that ties enterprise management closer to strategy and establishes management processes that make it easier to manage trade offs in the business system and to adapt strategy, operative activities, and resource utilization plans faster to changes in a company’s environment. At the same time SEM was also an emerging new software product to support these management processes (and I was the product manager at SAP for it). When I started to talk about the limitations of the traditional budget based management system, I received strong agreement from these executives: yes, the budget ties managers to the past, it does not provide them with incentives to look for new growth opportunities, and it makes the organization as a whole very inflexible. When I was talking about that “every manager is sitting on his budget after it is released – no possibility to adapt priorities, when the world is changing” – I saw just nodding heads. The most exciting thing of the SEM concept for them was, that it enables their organization to become more flexible and to react to change faster. They told me that this represent their most important objective with respect to their intentions to improve the management system of the company. And after we finished in the afternoon with the workshop on the planning processes, which was mainly targeted at the responsible person for budgeting and planning, the corporate controller stood up and asked the budgeting manager to come back until the following week with a plan for implementing the SEM concept and to define the requirements for the information systems to support it.  

Page 23: PMS

Meanwhile many other companies I worked with followed the same route and wanted to move beyond their traditional budgeting based management system. The reason is, that fixed budgets don’t work today. How can they? How can a static instrument that locks you into something you thought about last year be effective in a global economy with rapidly shifting market conditions and quick and nimble competitors? Comparing the “annual budget”, which is in essence last year’s reality, with actual revenues and expenditures on a monthly basis does not provide companies with useful information to manage their business. It merely locks them and their managers into the past. Rolling, perhaps monthly, forecasts and budgets focuses them on current and future realities. Through monthly or even event based forecasting, managers in an organization are forced to think ahead. For the company as a whole, it provides the possibility to offer realistic expectations for revenues and costs, and allows senior management to react before financial figures turn into the red. Budgets and forecasts are tools for resource allocation. Resource allocation needs to be consistent with strategy and prevailing business conditions. Companies have to manage strategy as a continuous process, so that strategy can be adaptive to changing business conditions, and resource allocation can follow suit. In this regard, they should approach strategy just as they do day-to-day operations. As they execute strategy-setting tasks again and again on a monthly or even weekly basis, they need an appropriate strategy and corporate performance management system that allows them to do that very efficiently.   

While regular, ideally event driven forecasting (events that threaten to reach defined objectives and targets) represent the core building block of any performance management system “beyond budgeting”, it is not enough. Also the behaviour and the entire management culture has to change. Around the same time, begin of 1998, when I started with research for our SEM project at SAP, working with some innovative customers and with some of the leading experts and consultants in the US and Europe, the CAM-I Beyond Budgeting Round Table (BBRT) was founded in the UK. Their mission was to identify companies that abandoned budgeting, analyse what they did instead in steering the organization and to try to identify the principles of a new management model that will enable companies to introduce more effective management processes and steering mechanisms. In fall 2000 we met and reconciled our findings and concepts. Interestingly, there was a large overlap (if not a total match) concerning the concepts for SEM management processes and BBRT management processes. But the real differentiator was the fact, that the BBRT concept tries to deal also with the soft facts of the new management system. The biggest contribution from the BBRT and Beyond Budgeting concept and what makes it really unique is that they found that today’s companies need – beside more effective and flexible management processes “beyond budgeting”, which usually are focused on the “hard facts”, that is on numbers – a management culture that enables managers to really perform and to develop their and their people’s capabilities. That is the reason why the Beyond Budgeting concept is consisting of two elements: a framework of 6 rules that focus on a management culture that allows frontline managers to really perform, and of 6 rules that focus on adaptive management processes that support such a management culture (see my first report about the BBRT concept from May 22, 2001).  

Page 24: PMS

 Why should a company consider to move Beyond Budgeting ?  The management system’s task is to institutionalize decisions through management processes on strategy adjustments, but also on adjustments of operational enterprise activities and resource utilization plans. This should enable the enterprise to continually control and optimize its short and long-term success in a dynamically changing enterprise environment. Every enterprise today is challenged by the fast change of market conditions, technologies, or customer behavior. Peter Drucker writes: “One cannot manage change, one can only can be ahead of it” (Peter Drucker, Management Challenges for the 21 st Century, New York, 1999 ). Companies and organizations of all kind have to become change leaders if they want to survive in today’s market environment. One specific characteristic of a change leader is, to perceive change as an opportunity. A change-leader organization is searching always for changes in its environment and disposes of the necessary “Organizational Intelligence” that allows it to identify quickly what changes are required internally and in their business model/system in order to respond. In addition, change leaders are also able to effectively translate the required change into action effectively with the objective to not only maintain their actual market position but to extend it by leveraging the changes happening in their markets. And this is especially true for companies that are based on intangible assets. They are subject to a higher risk exposure, especially to the risk of changing markets. Knowledge-based assets are also often characterized by "spill over effects" where competitors detract from the use of an innovation that its investors have, by copying it. This can be partially restricted by means of patents or protection of proprietary rights, but usually not completely. This is because knowledge based assets and related products can be copied much more easily than physical assets based value creation systems, which require considerable capital investments, which not every start up is able to fund. The problem can often only be solved by use of "time-to-market", where the investors are on the market with the product faster than the competition, and where the investors rapidly increase their own market share. This requires a close link between markets and internal development activities on the one side, and with commercialization activities on the other, with the capability for fast adaptation in the case of changing markets as the key success factor. But this rule not only applies today to knowledge and R&D intensive companies like in the pharmaceutical and high tech industries. As more and more companies, also in traditional industries, rely on intangible assets, the phenomenon becomes a more common one. Enterprise management systems therefore have to be designed in a way, that they do not only support companies and their managers to monitor and optimize their performance in the area of costs and revenues, but also to enable them to recognize immediately limits to growth in their value creation system and to eliminate them, as well as to control and manage output, that is the commercialization process. What is required are management systems, which enable dynamic action and reaction and fast, nearly continuous adaptation of the business system and of business activities to market and technology changes. The budget, the budgeting based

Page 25: PMS

traditional management systems represents a hurdle for an enterprise’s success rather than a supporting tool. Traditionally, the corner stone of the management system of a company is the budget. Budgeting is the central instrument of traditional management systems. All management processes and methods are based on and aligned with it: from strategy planning through resource allocation and cost management to monthly performance measurement and rewards. The budget determines how managers behave and on what activities and objectives they focus. And the main problem today is the inflexibility of the budget based management system. These annual budgets, which are absorbing considerable management time and other resources in creating them, are fixed over the following fiscal year as soon as they are released. Through monthly actual/budget comparisons companies check, how good manages are in meeting their budgets. The main target of these managers therefore is, to not exceed their budget, because their bonus is dependent on meeting the budget. But a strategic instrument that locks managers into something they thought and found right at the end of the previous fiscal year, can not be effective in a global knowledge economy with rapidly shifting market conditions and quick and nimble competitors. The monthly actual/budget comparison, which compares financial actuals, that is actual revenues and expenditures, with a budget that is typically already overtaken by reality only after a few weeks of the new fiscal year have passed, locks these managers in the past and in the fictive world of the budget. Companies are therefore trying to get rid of their inflexible budgets. They are moving instead to continuous rolling forecasting as part of their management processes, which enable for fast and coordinated adaptation to anticipated changes in their business environment and which also allow to balance the initiated change-management activities with continuity and short term performance. The key for it is an integrated strategy and corporate performance management process, of which the core and central process is not any more a fixed budget but a dynamic forecasting process (see figure 1). 

Page 26: PMS

Figure 1: Integrated strategy and corporate performance management processes (source: Juergen Daum, Intangible Assets and Value Creation, 2002) In contrast to the monthly actual/budget comparison, rolling monthly forecasts of financial performance and for other non-financial value drivers, which are related to the different value creation processes of a company, focus managers on current and future opportunities and risks and not on the past. The forecasting process forces them to look ahead and to achieve market objectives under changing conditions, instead of focusing their attention on how they can better meet the budget. In addition, budgeting is an expensive activity: the average company invests more than 25000 person days per billion dollars of revenue in the planning and performance measurement processes; a KPMG study showed that inefficient budgeting is eating up 20 to 30 percent of senior executives’ and financial manager’s time. But the strategic costs, the opportunity costs for companies not being able to thrive in the new knowledge and intangible based economy will probably be much larger. The CAM-I BBRT names six external factors affecting every company today and that are driving the case for change to abandon traditional budgeting and to move to the Beyond Budgeting model: - -         Shareholders are more demanding and are only loyal to those

organizations that are consistently at (or near) the top in their industry. But investors measure relative performance of companies (relative to their industry peers), rather than absolute performance. An important fact that needs to be considered when designing the Beyond Budgeting model.

Page 27: PMS

- -         Talented people are increasingly scarce. They want freedom, challenge and responsibility. And they care about values and the environment.

- -         The pace of innovation is increasing and product and strategy life cycles are shrinking. To compete, firms must produce a constant stream of new solutions and strategies

- -         Prices are falling and quality is rising. Firms must be operationally excellent to compete

- -         Customers are in charge and will switch loyalties if not totally satisfied. Firms must keep close to customers and respond rapidly to their changing needs.

- -         Demands for higher standards of ethical and social responsibility. Investors and regulators are demanding more open and honest performance reporting.

 How does the Beyond Budgeting model work ? The response of companies should be – according to the CAM-I BBRT – to develop a new leadership vision and governance model in order to establish a new performance management climate that allows an organization to react to these external factors and changes and to move to a networked type of organization, where decision power is devolved to those, who know the business the best: to frontline managers (see figure 2). The BBRT calls this a devolutionary framework: 1. 1.      Create a performance climate based on competitive success –

rather than on internal politics and on the principle that managers have to meet pure internal performance commitments

2. 2.      Motivate people by offering them challenge, responsibility, clear values as guidelines (instead of clear orders) and shared rewards

3. 3.      Devolve performance responsibility to operating managers; give them the freedom to decide

4. 4.      Empower operational managers by giving them the capability to act, by removing resource constraints (but agree on certain limiting parameters such as for example “cost-income-ratio” in bank)

5. 5.      Organize around customer oriented teams that are accountable for profitable customer outcomes – not around functions and departments that are accountable for meeting just the budget

6. 6.      Support transparent and open information systems that provide “one truth” throughout the organization

  

Page 28: PMS

Figure 2: The new environment is driving the case for change of a company’s governance model To make that really happen, the company needs a new way, how it manages performance, that is finance and the CFO have to come up with a new type of performance processes:  1. 1.      The goal setting process: It should be based on agreeing external

benchmark based targets, not on negotiating fixed targets. This is focusing mangers on beating the competition and not on meeting the budget. If the market goes up, a manager is still challenged to do better than competitors.

2. 2.      The motivation and rewards process: It should be based on recognizing and rewarding team-based success. Today, no single

Page 29: PMS

person can act alone in achieving specific targets for an organization. To reward people individually for reaching specific targets will create tension and mistrust in the organization, which is a recipe for bad performance.

  3. 3.      The strategy and action planning process: It should be devolved to

operating mangers and made continuous. It should not be managed centrally as an annual event. Only this way a company is able to use the know how from the people at the customer front to adapt fast and constantly to changing market needs.

  4. 4.      The resource utilization process: It should be based on local

access to resources (within agreed parameters), not on the basis on allocating them through annual budgets. Only this way frontline managers are able to act fast in front of threats and to realize sudden opportunities.

Page 30: PMS

 

 5. 5.      The coordination process: It should be based on making cross-

company interactions through “market-like” forces, not through predetermined detailed actions set down in central plans. Frontline, operative units negotiate resource and service requirements with service units and agree on certain ranges for required services (service level agreements).

  

6. 6.      The measurement and control process: It should provide fast, open, and distributed information for multilevel control. Information should be available to everyone, so that operational managers are able to compare their performance with the one of their colleagues and that senior managers can see what is going on and can monitor and challenge their subordinates (instead of controlling them).

Page 31: PMS

  

Information systems are playing a crucial role in making the new concept happen. This are requirements for information systems to support the Beyond Budgeting concept as I have presented it to the BBRT (see figure 3): 

- -         Flexible KPI based measurement systems that provide operational managers with timely and relevant information and decision support (Data Warehouses and OLAP data marts, Analytics, Fast Close / Business Activity Monitoring)

 - -         Flexible resource planning, forecasting and monitoring

processes require an information system that spans the organization (a planning system and forecasting system decoupled from operational systems and optimised for cross functional planning, but that can integrate data from all sources – e.g. based on a data warehouse system)

 - -         Flexible IT infrastructure that is able to easily integrate various

systems, provide flexibility to change processes, enables user centric access and services without lousing the necessary integration (an open and flexible IS infrastructure for accounting, analytics, management process support and user interaction)

  

Page 32: PMS

Figure 3: Management Information Delivery Architecture (source: Juergen Daum, Intangible Assets and Value Creation, 2002)  Analytical applications that supports managers and business analysts in performance management and in communication processes around performance management provide the tools and information they need to act under the Beyond Budgeting principles. This has to include also a framework for enterprise wide planning and forecasting as well as support for processes such as activity based management (see figure 4). 

Page 33: PMS

Figure 4: Information Systems optimised for analytics and decision support  Who should contribute to make it happen ? Beside the business managers, two other corporate functions contribute significantly to the success of companies in the intangibles based new economy: the one of the chief financial officer (CFO) and the one of the chief information officer (CIO). CFOs are the guardians of a company’s financial resource and are, as the economic conscience of the company, responsible for the economic transparency and for the “Business Intelligence” of the enterprise, that is for the design and usefulness of its management system. CIO’s are the masters of one of the most important basis resources of intangibles based businesses: of the infrastructure for information collection, information storage, and information distribution. The CFO needs the help of the CIO, who has to provide the new information technologies and infrastructure for the new management system. The CIO needs the support of the CFO in order to be able to focus his resources and the expertise of his team on those projects that are most relevant to the economic success of the company.

But not only the “hard facts” are a decisive factors for companies today. As the BBRT pointed out, also the soft factors, the performance management culture of a company is crucial. People related success factors might be ultimately the most important drivers of a company’s performance. HR experts and people experienced with organizational change projects should therefore be part of the project team.

And the guardian of the hard facts, the CFO, might change his role as well in the transformation process. The core competency of a CFO in the future, in order to create maximum value for his company, will be to understand

Page 34: PMS

and monitor the economics of the value creation system of his company. This also has to include the ability to translate - together with his management team colleagues - this understanding into a concept for an appropriate management and reporting system, and to provide related services to management and investors, rather than to manage basic accounting processes and the treasury function of the company. So the traditional role of a CFO will be transformed from the role of a “chief cash manager and chief accountant” to the one of an agile and active Chief Value Officer (CVO), who always keeps an eye on the effectiveness of the value creation system of the company, on the efficiency of its business processes, and on its unrealized value creation potential and he is constantly pressing for its realization. The CFO will be transformed from an administrator of administrative processes to a real business partner for his management colleagues, who directly contributes to the success of the company by ensuring the necessary management transparency. Companies might start to establish business intelligence competence centres, of which the task is, to provide support for managers in understanding new business problems that require in-depth economic knowledge. This will include the collection, editing, and preparation of relevant unstructured internal and external business information that will be supplied to business managers and for example investors through the above-described web based self-services. In addition, the center will provide other services such as management consulting, training in business issues and economics (for example also in form of online webcasts), M&A services, investor relation services etc.. The staff of the centre might come from different functions: from HR, finance, strategic planning, from the operational business … (see figure 5).  

Page 35: PMS

Figure 5: The corporate Business Intelligence Competence Centre (source: Juergen Daum, Intangible Assets and Value Creation, 2002)

 

The Transition Route – Major success factors

The move to a performance management model “beyond budgeting” is not an easy task. It requires an active commitment of the executive level. To get their buy in, is therefore the most important step in making it happen. A possible action plan for implementing a new performance management system beyond budgeting may therefore look like this one:

- -         Identify the problem areas with the current performance management system (e.g. through a structured survey) and actively sell the case for change and a vision for a new system to senior management

- -         Look for quick wins (by providing e.g. fast actuals, by improving access to information, by moving to continuous forecasting, by introducing new KPI’s …) – start small, be fast

- -         Set up a cross-functional, interdisciplinary team to steer and manage the implementation project – the team can serve later as the core group of the new Business Intelligence Competence Center

Summary  Traditionally, the corner stone of the management system of a company is the budget. The budget determines how managers behave and on what activities and objectives they focus. These annual budgets, which are absorbing considerable management time and other resources in creating them, are fixed over the following fiscal year as soon as they are released. Through monthly actual/budget comparisons companies check, how good manages are in meeting their budgets. The main target of these managers therefore is, to not exceed their budget, because their bonus is dependent on meeting the budget. In today’s business environment, which forces companies to constantly change and adapt to changing customer demands and markets, the budget is not the right tool anymore to manage a company and its performance. It locks managers into something they thought and found right at the end of the previous fiscal year. It can not be effective in a global knowledge economy with rapidly shifting market conditions and quick and nimble competitors.  Companies are therefore looking today for performance management concepts “Beyond Budgeting”. They are experimenting already with KPI based reporting systems, rolling or event driven continuous forecasting etc.. But what is needed is a more comprehensive and systematic approach. A concept which is gaining increasingly mind share worldwide and which intends to provide just that, is the Beyond Budgeting concept of the CAM-I BBRT. It tries to combine the hard fact side in form of new performance management processes (typically the responsibility of finance) with the soft fact side of a new performance management climate and a “devolutionary

Page 36: PMS

framework”, where the people at the front, working with customers, get the freedom to decide and act (typically the responsibility of the CEO and of HR).  To make it happen it requires the commitment of the executive team, but the contribution of especially three corporate functions:

- -         finance (hard facts)- -         IT (bringing the hard facts to everyone)- -         HR (managing the change from a people perspective)

 

Additional resources (updated Jan. 2005):

Juergen Daum’s Beyond Budgeting Information Center  New!

Website of the Beyond Budgeting Round Table (BBRT)

Interview with Jeremy Hope (co-founder of the BBRT): The Origins of Beyond   Budgeting and of the Beyond   Budgeting Round Table (BBRT)   

Enterprise Management, Leadership and Business Control for Value Creation - presentation from Juergen H. Daum, held at the Executive Briefing on Performance Measurement of the Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield School of Management, 27 January 2004 in London, UK  program of the briefing

Beyond Budgeting on the move: report from the First Annual Beyond Budgeting S ummit in London, 1-2 July 2003

Enterprise Management in the 21st Century - A Blueprint for a New Approach and the role of Information Systems   Presentation held by Juergen Daum at the BBRT member's meeting, 26 June 2003in Walldorf/Germany, and held as well at the First Annual Beyond Budgeting Summit, 2nd July 2003 in London/UK program of the summit         

Interview with Lennart Francke, CFO, Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm:Managing without budgets at Svenska Handelsbanken

Presentations held by Juergen H. Daum at the Beyond Budgeting Round Table member's meetings:- Dec 07, 2000, London/UK: Strategic Enterprise Management - May 16, 2002, London/UK: Information System Requirements for Performance Management Beyond Budgeting 

SAP’s White Paper “Beyond Budgeting”, which was co-authored by colleagues at SAP AG, Juergen Daum, and the Consortium for Advanced Manufacturing International (CAM-I) Beyond Budgeting Round Table

Beyond Budgeting – article from Jeremy Hope and Robin Fraser (the initiators and researchers behind the CAM-I BBRT concept), published in the U.S. Magazine “Strategic Finance”, issue October 2000

Page 37: PMS

Panel discussion at the eCFO conference 2001 of the CFO Europe Magazine, Oktober 18-19, 2001 in Brussels, Belgium: "The Beyond Budgeting Management Model". Participants: Janet Kersnar, Editor-in-Chief CFO Europe Magazine; Guiseppe Biamino, manager Budgeting & Controlling at SNAM Rete Gas in Italy; Robin Fraser, Program Director CAM-I BBRT; Peter Herold, Senior Manager Deloitte Consulting UK; Juergen Daum, SAP AG. Can a company really implement the Beyond

Budgeting model? This question was discussed by the participants on the panel: »video (Real Player)   » video (Media Player)  

Intangible Assets and Value Creation – a book from Juergen Daum, focusing on a new enterprise model and on the new management system “beyond budgeting” for the new knowledge and intangible assets based economy of today, comprising many examples and case studies. It describes the new environment and its consequences for businesses, the rules that can be extracted from this understanding for the design of a new management system, and it develops a framework for a new management system and describes its elements, as well as how a company can set it up and bring it to live.

Page 38: PMS

Advantages of Performance Management Outsourcing

Appraisals Home » Advantages of Performance Management Outsourcing  

HR outsourcing helps the HR professionals of the organisations to concentrate on the strategic functions and processes of human resource management rather than wasting their efforts, time and money on the routine work. The major advantages of outsourcing performance management are:

Outsourcing is beneficial for both the corporate organisations that use the outsourcing services as well as the consultancies that provide the service to the corporates. Apart from increasing their revenues, outsourcing provides business opportunities to the service providers, enhancing the skill set of the service providers and exposure to the different corporate experiences thereby increasing their expertise.

The Advantages of Performance Management Outsourcing accruing to the corporates are:

i. turning the management's focus to strategic level processes of HRM

ii. accessibility to the expert knowledge and state of the art technologyiii. freedom from red tape and adhering to strict rules and regulations

Page 39: PMS

iv. optimal resource utilisationv. structured and fair performance management.vi. a satisfied and, hence, highly productive employeesvii. value creation, operational flexibility and competitive advantage

Therefore outsourcing helps both the organisations and the consultancies to grow and perform better.

 Once a Year Overview

Self Appraisal

Performance Review - Preparation

Performance Review - The Meeting

How to Complete a Performance Appraisal Form

Analysis for Improving Performance

Active performance appraisal conversation

Performance appraisal feedback

Performance Consulting: Moving Beyond Training

Writing performance appraisal

Performance Appraisal Training

How to Measure Employee Performance

FAQ about Performance Appraisal

 

Performance Management

PDRI’s model of performance management includes:

Competencies Appraisal Promotion Compensation

Page 40: PMS

Succession Planning

We have successfully developed and implemented numerous results-oriented performance management systems. We help organizations, managers, and employees develop performance objectives and standards that clearly communicate expectations by translating organizational goals into more specific lower level goals.

Performance Management — A Leadership PriorityUSAID uses strategic management processes to ensure that its program

planning, management, and reporting capabilities:

← effectively support U.S. foreign policy ← are able to respond quickly to today's rapidly evolving global environment ← achieve and report on desired results.

Page 41: PMS

D

The Challenge of Strategic Alignment

5th January 2009A FSN & Oracle White Paper

The Challenge of Strategic Alignment

Page 42: PMS

The role of Scorecards & Dashboards in Strategy Execution

Contents

Introduction

Communication

Is the message clear?

Strategy maps and trees

The challenge of alignment

Technology and strategy

Scorecards

Dashboards

Summary

Introduction

A strategy is by definition the starting point for corporate behavior. It expresses

an organization’s ambitions, sets out its chosen direction and describes the

principal initiatives and projects necessary to achieve its mission. Business

schools, management gurus and strategy boutiques regularly develop new

approaches and methodologies for strategy formulation and all acknowledge its

overwhelming importance in setting the tone for the organization and its

prospects for success.

Despite its significance, aligning an organization to its strategy remains one of

the most elusive and unsatisfactory areas of management endeavour. Indeed,

research has shown that 85% of executive teams spend less than 1 hour per

month discussing strategy and only 5% of the workforce understands strategy.(1)

Executives spend days or weeks devising well-crafted strategies and then throw them “over the wall” to the rest of the company, hoping and praying that their vision will bear fruit.(2)

Page 43: PMS

Yet the notion of aligning an enterprise with its strategy is not beyond the grasp

of all organizations. Take for example a football team about to play a vital

competitive match. The manager sets out the strategy and each player’s role

within it so that they understand how their actions affect other players and the

delivery of the desired outcome. Decisions all along the chain of command from

manager to captain and to the rest of the team are geared to delivering strategic

objectives, so why is it so difficult to emulate this behaviour in a business setting?

A football analogy may not be a perfect paradigm for the world of government,

industry and commerce but there are useful pointers which help to distil the

essential components of strategic alignment from the corporate ‘noise’ that

frequently obfuscates the strategic message, namely;

A clear understanding of stakeholder requirements and external influences. An unequivocal statement of strategy, with measurable objectives and clearly

articulated performance measures. Systems and processes which enable the strategy to be communicated in a

consistent, relevant and appropriate way to all corners of the organization. A highly trained workforce that is equipped and competent to act on the strategy. Feedback mechanisms that enable under or over performance to be identified

rapidly so that remedial action can be taken to bring strategy delivery back on course.

Threading its way through all of these apparent pre-requisites for success is

communication and collaboration which are the binding agents that ‘glue’ the

organization (the people) to the process and its enabling technology.

Communication

Strategy development is a curious mixture of science and art, fact and insight,

knowledge, experience and creativity. In addition, in today’s complex

multinational organizations it draws on the skills of management from across the

enterprise and in all functional areas. After all, strategy has implications for the

development of human capital, information technology, product development and

financial management to name a few, as well as the use of all other assets and

resources owned by a company.

Page 44: PMS

This in turn means that if strategy is to be delivered successfully by an

organization it must be clearly articulated and communicated throughout the

business. In other words, the strategy must be widely understood at all

management levels so that operational plans and day to day activities are

aligned with corporate goals and objectives.

However, the importance of communication in the strategy process is no longer

confined to management, employees and internal stakeholders. Changing

attitudes to corporate governance and corporate social responsibility throughout

the developed world coupled with demanding legislation to protect shareholders

in many geographies, means that management are now formally accountable to

a wider set of external stakeholders as well. It is now incumbent on management

to ensure that strategy development and communication follows a robust and

auditable process so that resources deployed in the business are strategically

aligned and management actions can be justified, if required, to an external

audience.

Capturing such fluid requirements is a challenge. Most management teams

resort to flip charts, break-out groups and facilitated meetings to drive out the

thinking and record key decisions.

Methodologies such as The Balanced Scorecard, Six Sigma, EVA and others

can provide a helpful framework but they are largely paper based in the

development phase and can be difficult to change and communicate. So they do

not readily keep pace with the iterative and creative nature of strategy

development.

“When companies commit to a strategy and communicate ‘This is how we win’, and can align execution with corporate objectives, they begin to create a culture of performance.”(3)

Is the Message Clear?

In large and complex heterogeneous organizations the sheer scale of the task

makes it extremely difficult to view the overall strategy and check its integrity, let

alone cascade it through the organization. Take for example the development of

Page 45: PMS

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) – measures which support the achievement

of specific objectives derived from a strategy.

This stage of strategy development is a demanding and often contentious

process. Managers from different geographies, product lines and functional areas

can have very different views on what makes an organization ‘tick’ and may

disagree even more on the performance measures that should be monitored,

particularly where these affect remuneration policy.

Often, an organization has too many performance indicators and simply

achieving functional and organizational alignment of KPIs (Key Performance

Indicators) can seem like a Herculean task. Old KPIs can often go unchallenged

while at the same time new KPIs reflecting, say, social and environmental

initiatives need to be developed.

Recent research also shows that many organizations give too much prominence

to internally generated KPIs – controlling the controllable – rather than looking

outwards at threats and opportunities on the horizon which can ultimately be far

more influential on performance.

There is also a tendency to rely too heavily on trusted financial indicators of

performance rather than less familiar non-financial indicators. However, there is a

growing acceptance that concentrating purely on financial metrics may not be the

best way to increase shareholder value.

While financial key performance indicators will always have a prominent role in

measuring performance of a business, they are widely acknowledged to be of

limited value when predicting future performance. Unfortunately, traditional

financial measures such as “profit”, “cash generated from operations”, and

“revenues booked” so called, lagging indicators, provide little insight into future

prospects and outcomes.

On the other hand, non-financial indicators are often tightly correlated with future

financial performance. For example, measures of customer satisfaction are often

linked with a propensity to buy goods and services in the future. Similarly,

measures around innovation, such as the percentage of sales derived from new

Page 46: PMS

products inform about a company’s medium to longer term prospects for

success. Likewise, employee commitment gives insights into future workforce

attrition and, by implication, the ability to earn revenues in the future.

While these key areas of performance such as employee engagement, customer

loyalty and innovation may be impossible to express in purely financial terms and

can be difficult to measure, few doubt that they are critical to assessing the

health of a company.

There are also internal challenges around the compatibility of KPI’s in one part of

an organization with another. For example, the strategic decision to take market

share in emerging markets with a new product may be at odds with financial key

performance indicators such as increasing profit. After all, markets in developing

economies are usually expensive to enter and exploit – normally with lower

returns. Clearly, this simplistic scenario is capable of generating conflicting

organizational behaviour around the allocation of capital.

But how do you identify such conflicts from a sprawling mass of information and

how do you keep a strategy agile and flexible in the face of increasingly volatile

markets?

Strategy Maps and Trees

Visualising a strategy and keeping a handle on the integrity of the links between,

corporate vision, strategic objectives and the KPIs which support them is a huge

challenge. Yet it is vital that the management team can view the entire

performance “world”, define the principle objectives and tactics necessary to

deliver the strategy, assess the correct relationships and agree on the aspects of

performance to measure.

Creating a Strategy Tree is an excellent way to not only layout what it is you are

trying to achieve, but also how you intend to achieve it. Strategy trees depict

each strategic objective (what you are a trying to achieve), the related critical

success factors (what you must have or be good at to achieve the objective) and

ultimately the actions or initiatives related to each critical success factor (what

you will do in order to achieve the critical success factors and ultimately the

Page 47: PMS

objective). Thinking through and illustrating this logical network enables everyone

to clearly see the plan. Add to it the people, teams and departments responsible

to get it done and you have a solid plan of action.

Fig 1: Strategy Trees in Oracle’s Hyperion Performance Scorecard application

depict both the objectives and how you intend to achieve them.

 

Strategy maps typically contain a subset of objects from the strategy tree. To

create a “single page” view of the organizational strategy, the idea of including

only objectives and their relationship to one another on the strategy map has

become very popular – especially with executives. Inevitably though, the

development of objectives and the relationships between them can become

unwieldy and complex in a multinational organization. Maintaining a coherent

view of each strategic scenario can be a huge presentational challenge using

traditional paper based tools or spreadsheets. Add in a huge number of KPIs and

the scale of the problem starts to become clear. It is not surprising that many

strategies end up as a collection of printed PowerPoint slides, Excel

spreadsheets and Word documents gathering dust on a shelf.

Strategy maps, trees and related scorecards overcome this by using visualization

techniques, which enable large amounts of information to be displayed on screen

Page 48: PMS

at one time. They enable the integrity of relationships between objectives and

KPIs to be explored and confirmed during the strategy development phase and

changes can be made on the fly. Once agreed upon, strategy maps become an

active window on performance enabling under and over achievement to be

monitored together with the consequences for the organization. Finally, they

provide a platform for articulating strategy and linking it into operational plans and

budgets.

Fig 2: Strategy Maps in Oracle’s Hyperion Performance Scorecard application graphically show the key interrelationships between strategic objectives and current performance based on KPIs

 

The challenge of alignment

The inherent agility of a strategy map is important since strategy development

can no longer be viewed as a standalone activity. In a climate of constant

change, the strategy has to be accessible and constantly fine tuned in response

to market conditions. In other words the strategy has to be an inextricable part of

a broader performance management regime which constantly tests and refines

the strategy as new information comes to light. However, the thinking around

strategy development and how it relates to broader performance management is

Page 49: PMS

still evolving as the very latest methodologies attempt to recognise more complex

market dynamics, stakeholder interests and more diverse trading relationships.

The traditional performance management cycle (Figure 3) which focuses on a

series of linked applications or tasks no longer adequately describes the true

nature of these core business processes. The newly emerging paradigm of

“Strategy to Success” takes a more process oriented view of performance

management, underscoring the real purpose of performance management with

more conviction.

For example, the starting point for strategy developments is re-positioned in the

phrase “Gain to Sustain” – which more aptly recognises that meeting the needs

of multiple stakeholders such as employees, customers and even

environmentalists is the crucial first step to creating value in one’s own

organization. “Investigate to Invest” encapsulates the market perspective and the

need to understand the market dynamics affecting the business – an outside-in

viewpoint that has to be married up with an inside-out perspective.

Fig 3: The traditional performance management cycle

 

Page 50: PMS

The traditional performance management cycle depicted in Figure 3 above is a

continuous process made up of a series of iterative steps. The strategy

establishes the goals and performance measures for the organization which are

built into business plans, budgets and forecasts which are monitored

continuously against actuals, analysed and reported upon. The results of these

analyses are then used to inform and refine the strategy which is adjusted as

appropriate before the whole performance cycle starts again – which is why

performance management is sometimes referred to as a closed loop process.

Hospitality Services Company (HSC) finds that a holistic approach to

performance management pays dividends

Hospitality Services Company (HSC) connects people with the world’s greatest

travel and leisure possibilities by retailing travel products and providing

distribution and technology solutions for the hospitality industry. In 2004 it was a

sector experiencing massive change, creating a myriad of people and process

issues for the business. The lack of communication regarding strategy and its

execution led the CEO at the time to conclude that “only 25 percent of our

Page 51: PMS

strategy is effectively executed”. The leadership team knew that they had to align

the entire organization around a common strategy if the company was to achieve

its longer term goals.

The new HSC management team had set aggressive and inspirational goals but

to achieve them they needed to better align strategy, initiatives, measures and

rewards – an integrated approach to Corporate Performance Management

(CPM). The initial charter for the CPM initiative included, enhancing the

traditional strategic planning process, establishing a “system of sensors” to

accelerate identification of, and response to, emerging opportunities, coupled

with planning applications that focussed on key drivers of the business.

Having secured project sponsorship at the highest levels of the organization, the

organization embarked on a comprehensive change program. The initial phase

was to develop a strategy map for the core business units which was closely

aligned with Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard framework. For each

objective on the strategy map two to three key performance indicators (KPIs)

were identified together with an initial target. When a list of current initiatives was

associated with the strategic objectives it was found that 65 percent of

discretionary spending was not core to the strategy. Steps were taken to reduce

funding in this area. Operational plans were revised to make sure that they had

an appropriate mix of specific metrics and targets – some designed to stretch the

organization.

Finally, organizational alignment was embedded more deeply through the

introduction of a rolling forecast that linked operational drivers to the financial

results. After a period of acclimatization this provided greater insight into trends

in performance, reduced the burden of traditional budgeting and delivered

greater confidence in forecast outcomes.

The program was hugely successful in bringing about more rapid decision

making, more effective responses to performance gaps, better (strategically

aligned) investment decisions and more accurate forecasting. HSC’s CEO

concluded “Our CPM program has helped us to focus on the business as a whole

and build alignment across the organization. (6)

Page 52: PMS

On the other hand, Oracle’s leading edge “Strategy to Success” paradigm

depicts the performance management cycle from a more meaningful process

oriented view, starting with a thorough assessment of stakeholder interests.

Fig 4: Oracle’s Strategy to Success Framework

 

But how does an organization communicate its strategy and imbue its workforce

with the knowledge it needs to confidently take decisions knowing they are

strategy compliant? How do they take the concept of ‘Strategy to Success’ and

bring it to life? How do they transfer the strategy from the board table to each

employee and embed it in the organization?

“Strategy is completely useless unless the results of the strategy process, the position you choose to occupy, the way you are going to drive your company, is well understood, quite broadly. Because the number one purpose of strategy is alignment, it’s really to get all the people in the organization making good choices, re-enforcing each other’s choices because everybody is pursuing a common value proposition, a common way of gaining competitive advantage.” (4)

Technology and Strategy

Technology is not a ‘magic bullet’ that will instantly transform an organization and

remedy all cultural impediments to change. There is no substitute for traditional

forms of communication such as briefings, conferences, webcasts, seminars,

workshops and other forms of meeting (both formal and informal) in order to

communicate the strategy and make it relevant for a particular part of the

Page 53: PMS

organization. Employees and their managers need to know how the strategy

affects them, what they might be doing differently and how they will be measured

and rewarded. Failure to recognise and embrace the cultural aspects of

performance management is courting disaster.

Scorecards

Once the messages are broadly understood this needs to be followed up with the

use of scorecard technologies. These are central to strategic alignment as they

bind the users to the strategy itself, presenting them with those aspects of the

strategy map (objectives and performance indicators) that are relevant to their

role, department or division. They provide a method of visualising the key

measures of performance, their direction (performance getting better or worse),

key responsibilities and what actions are being taken. As such, scorecards make

users strategically aware, with a precise understanding of how their actions or

inactions affect the achievement of the strategy.

Some sense of the importance of scorecard technology and how it can assist

strategic alignment can be taken by considering the example of a commercial

aircraft in which the passengers have access to the same information as the

flight deck. Individual televisions display the aircraft’s position on a map, its

height, speed and displays important messages about safety and key activities.

Effectively, flight crew and passengers are strategically aligned – there is a

common understanding of the destination, how far the journey has progressed

and each person’s role in helping to get there on time. Cooperating with the flight

crew during on-board activities such as being seated quickly, storing their hand

luggage, returning to their seats when requested and cleaning up the seating

area at the end of the flight, all contribute to an on-time arrival. A safe, on-time

arrival is the mutual objective for crew and passengers alike. Although this

analogy is simplistic it serves to underline the essence of strategic alignment -

which is communication.

Fujitsu Services OY uses scorecards to promote strategic alignment

Fujitsu Services OY provides information technology (IT) services in Finland,

assuming full responsibility for its customers’ IT and infrastructure and their

Page 54: PMS

enterprise applications. The company, which employs 2,300 people decided to

implement a scorecard system in its banking and insurance services businesses

for several reasons.

Prior to the implementation of the scorecard system the organization’s strategy

and objectives were viewed as being too abstract. There was a need to

communicate the strategy to everyone simply and clearly as well as the

requirement to ‘translate’ strategy into operational terms. By having appropriate

measures at different levels of the organization, systematising the existing

scorecard process and providing data more frequently it was considered possible

to more readily understand cause and effect between measures and align the

organization more completely around its strategic goals.

Supported by senior management, the scorecard methodology followed a

tailored version of the Kaplan and Norton Balanced Scorecard framework. Fujitsu

track around 20 measures but report only those that are crucial to the strategy on

executive scorecards. Of the measures being tracked, 40 percent are financial,

40 percent are non-financial and 20 percent are mixed.

Fujitsu executives review six to ten performance measures which are considered

vital to understand the status of the overall organization. These measures are

consistent with the organization’s annual and longer-term goals. The system

enables the same measures to be reported at the level of individual managers,

divisions and major accounts and these are linked to employee reward and

compensation schemes.

Fujitsu believes that the scorecard system has driven performance improvement,

achieved sustainable alignment throughout the organization as it has grown and

supported better communication of its strategy to its employees. This enhanced

understanding has resulted in more strategically aligned and rapid decision

making together with a more responsive organization. (6)

But scorecards are a means to an end – not an end in themselves. Many

organizations are littered with failed scorecarding projects because they are

divorced from strategic intent. They have little purpose or relevance to the

Page 55: PMS

individuals charged with using them and perhaps do not enjoy management

sponsorship and support.

Failures also occur because the roll-out of the project uses inappropriate

technology. The scorecarding approach needs to be an integral part of the wider

performance management platform so that the data required to populate the

scorecard, is consistent, meaningful, accurate and available on demand. These

objectives cannot be met by a series of disconnected spreadsheets no matter

how appealing the initial design of the scorecard may look.

However, scorecards as part of an integrated performance management platform

provide an invaluable method of supporting change in the organization. The

precise strategy methodology employed, for example, the ‘Balanced Scorecard’

or ‘6-Sigma’ is a matter of personal choice for an organization. In general the

available scorecard technologies are highly adaptable and support all of the

leading scorecard methodologies.

The usual way of depicting performance metrics on a scorecard is to use a grid

style layout together with icons, such as colored arrows, or other user selected

icons to denote the status of performance. Whereas the emphasis of a

dashboard is to instantly communicate performance for a limited number of

measures in an eye catching way, the scorecard is designed to promote deeper

enquiry and analysis.

The exact layout of the scorecard is usually user definable and can normally

draw on the full multidimensional capability of the underlying database. In this

way it is possible to look at different performance measures, in different time

periods and for different slices of the organizational hierarchy and other

dimensions. It is also possible to review historic performance of say, actual

against target for any given measure as a graphical display.

But performance management is about gleaning insights into future performance

and guiding decision making rather than simply looking at historic performance

through a rear-view mirror. In the first instance, the scorecard should enable

users to monitor the status of the objectives and current performance by

highlighting under or over achievement and on target performance, but the

Page 56: PMS

challenge is then to determine what is driving current performance and what can

be done to deliver above target performance or bring below par performance

back on track. Scorecards typically make extensive use of threaded discussions,

annotations, and attachments to record discussions and document supporting

initiative progress.

The drill-down capability of a scorecard system enables the user to follow KPIs

down the hierarchical organizational structure revealing the performance

contribution made by business units or individuals lower down the tree. It should

also be possible to drill across the hierarchies to look at performance in different

dimensions. It is important that a scorecarding system provides visual cues,

flagging where acceptable performance at one level may be masking poor

performance lower down the structure.

Crucially, during drill down a scorecarding application should show the

interrelationship between the performance indicators and other measures such

as projects, goals and objectives and start to form a view about how performance

in one area is affecting performance in another. Also typically, data is not

refreshed frequently as most organizations to not monitor strategy on a daily

basis, but rather a quarterly, half-year or annual basis.

The insights gained through scorecards and the explicit relationship between

different performance measures derived from the strategy help to ensure that

users understand exactly how their goals support the corporate strategy and how

their decisions affect its execution. Scorecards are widely acknowledged to be

the best vehicle available for helping organizations communicate and execute on

their strategies.

Dashboards

There is no firm delineation between Dashboards and Scorecards. Both are

capable of being used in a wide variety of contexts and for example, a dashboard

can be employed on a tactical and operational level as well as a strategic level by

shifting the metrics to suit the organization at different levels of the hierarchy.

Similarly, dashboards which are generally regarded as a window on historic

performance can complement the delivery of strategy.

Page 57: PMS

One main principle behind a dashboard is that it should be easy to understand so

that users have immediate visibility of the KPIs relevant to their role and function

and can assess instantly whether performance is on target or within an

acceptable range.

A dashboard is often likened to an aviator’s instrument panel or ‘head-up’ display

of key data such as altitude, fuel and compass bearing. In effect a handful of

measures tell the pilot how he is performing and, by inference, what remedial

action needs to be taken to keep the mission (operational performance) on track.

All measures on the dashboard are only relevant to the execution of the current

mission but do not indicate the importance of the mission (as would a scorecard).

Dashboards make extensive use of familiar dials and charts that colorfully

convey the status of performance at a glance, rather like the fuel gauge in a

motor vehicle. Like a strategy map, dashboards often make generous use of

color, “traffic lighting”, to denote good (green), amber (acceptable) and red (bad)

performance. The criteria that determine what constitutes good, acceptable and

bad performance are normally completely user definable. Typically, performance

bands can be established for whole companies or defined uniquely so that

individual employees can set their own personal targets within the overall

boundaries defined by the company. The exact information shown on a

performance dashboard is usually a matter of choice. An organization, for

example, can decide whether performance should be measured at the level of a

product / customer, activity or project and may choose to display KPI targets or

actual, current performance and status, i.e. below, above or on target. Similarly,

performance dials can usually be viewed for different time periods. Typically,

dashboard data is refreshed frequently to enable fast tactical adjustments and

does not include much textual explanation.

Dashboards provide an intuitive and accessible window on current performance

and are therefore highly suited to tactical decisions and managers that are

uncomfortable with tabular information and spreadsheet style grids that pervade

most information systems. The ability to view current performance at a glance

and to increase understanding of variances by navigating to underlying data

makes dashboards an invaluable aid to tactical decisions.

Page 58: PMS

However, by using dashboards and scorecards in the same performance

environment an organization can encourage both strategic alignment

(scorecards) and better operational analysis (dashboards). Ultimately, both of

these can be used to inform and trim strategy as and when needed.

Summary

One of the greatest management challenges of the 21st Century is guiding large

and complex organizations towards their goals. Value creation, whether

expressed in shareholder value terms or delivery of services in the public sector

can only be assured if strategic intent flows uninterrupted from board room to

shop floor. In this way individuals feel empowered to make decisions, confident in

the knowledge that their actions are aligned with the overall goals of the

organization.

Communication is at the heart of strategy delivery. A clearly articulated message,

accompanied by succinct and relevant performance measures provides the

baseline which nurtures and supports the desired management behaviours.

Technology plays a vital role in visioning the strategy and communicating it

throughout the organization as part of a broader performance management

regime. In complex environments strategy maps help management describe the

performance framework, articulate performance measures and ensure

consistency across the enterprise while integrated scorecards popularised by

Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, have proved invaluable in communicating

the essence of strategy across an enterprise in an engaging and relevant way.

Closely coupled to budgeting, planning and reporting applications, the full

panoply of modern performance management systems provide a robust platform

for sound decision making at both a tactical and strategic level.

Ultimately, for executing strategy, dashboards and scorecards are

complementary tools. Dashboards typically help you to understand and manage

tactical operations while scorecards help you to understand and manage

strategy. Great companies do not just happen by accident. Research shows that

those which are able to ride the challenge of strategic alignment create long term

greatness not just temporary success.(5)

Page 59: PMS

Bibliography

The Strategy Gap, by Michael Coveney – John Wiley & Sons 2003 Performance Dashboards, Measuring, Monitoring and Managing Your Business,

Wayne W. Eckerson. Drive Business Performance, Enabling a Culture of Intelligent Execution, Bruno

Aziza & Joey Fitts Professor Michael E Porter, Harvard University, HBR Interview, The Five

Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy Details in Beyond Entrepreneurship, Turning your Business into an Enduring

Great Company, Prentice Hall. New York 1992 Scorecard Best Practices. Raef Lawson, Toby Hatch, Denis Desroches. Copyright

2008 John Wiley & Sons. Inc. Reprinted with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Leading author

Gary Simon Group Publisher of FSN and Managing Editor of FSN Newswire.

Contributing authors

Toby Hatch, Consulting Solution Specialist, Oracle

Nigel Youell, Director – Product Marketing, Oracle

The authors would like to thank Hitachi Consulting Corporation for their

contribution to the HSC case study contained in the whitepaper

About FSN

FSN Publishing Limited is an independent research, news and publishing

organization catering for the needs of the finance function. The report is written

by Gary Simon, Group Publisher of FSN and Managing Editor of FSN Newswire.

He is a graduate of London University, a Chartered Accountant and a Fellow of

the British Computer Society with more than 23 years experience of

implementing management and financial reporting systems. Formerly a partner in

Deloitte for more than 16 years, he has led some of the most complex

information management assignments for global enterprises in the private and

public sector.

Oracle

Page 60: PMS

Oracle is the leader in Enterprise Performance Management (EPM), unifying

Performance

Management applications and Business Intelligence (BI), supporting a broad

range of strategic, financial and operational management processes. Oracle

provides a complete and integrated system for managing and optimizing

enterprise-wide performance. This enables organizations to achieve a state of

management excellence, which provides competitive advantage and leverages

their operational investments.

Hitachi Consulting Corporation

As Hitachi Ltd.’s (NYSE: HIT) global consulting company, with operations in the

United States, Europe and Asia, Hitachi Consulting is a recognized leader in

delivering proven business and IT strategies and solutions to Global 2000

companies across many industries. With a balanced view of strategy, people,

process and technology, we work with companies to understand their unique

business needs, and to develop and implement practical business strategies and

technology solutions. For more information, call 1.877.664.0010 or visit

CGM partners with your organization to implement a system that extends beyond basic measurement. Our methodology for performance management establishes a communication and feedback mechanism for aligning the organization’s activities with the strategic plan. We guide management in deploying resources towards achieving results charted out in the strategic planning including institutionalizing the results through business process improvement (BPI).

CGM uses three principles to conduct the business process engineering methodology. The result is a high performing team, executing on a sound decision making process: Focused, Consistent, and Efficient.

Our three BPI principles:

Know Your Business - Benchmark your current business processes. Create an Agile Business - Apply techniques to optimize sustainable processes. Iterative Methodology - Effectively implement new processes and proactively report

progress.

Page 61: PMS

Performance Management is the process by which an organisation sets objectives, plans, monitors progress and takes action to maximise business results that align to its BI strategy. It allows customers to monitor, analyse, and plan their business as well as drive alignment, accountability, and actionable insight across the entire organisation.

Business executives can drive accountability and alignment across and up-and-down the organisation, while information workers can monitor, analyse, and plan activities with an integrated and collaborative solution. IT managers can drive better adoption and compliance by enabling organisations to intuitively associate business intelligence and corporate performance.

Microsoft® Office PerformancePoint™ Server 2007 provides all of the functionality that is needed for performance management including scorecards, dashboards, management reporting, analytics, planning, budgeting, forecasting, and consolidation.

The application reaches all employees, across all business functions. Decision-makers need to drive performance by accelerating business decision making, while adapting to changing business conditions and enforcing corporate governance. PerformancePoint Server 2007 allows the organisation to build reliable plans faster and execute against them by aligning and driving accountability across business operations.

Page 62: PMS

Performance Management Courses Successfully managing people creates business success.

Specific skills and approaches are required to achieve this performance and yet “Performance Management” is a phrase often reserved for team members performing badly or the annual review. In fact, Performance Management is a powerful and effective toolkit of skills that is essential to success.

Equip Learning presents a modern strategy for Managing Performance by linking the steps required into an effective process and developing the skills and approaches required.

The Performance Management Suite

This set of courses delivers a powerful opportunity for managers to develop Performance Management skills.

Our core course Performance Management Toolkit provides a foundation understanding and covers the essential skills and approaches required. This course can be completed as a powerful stand alone module or it can be completed with other modules from the suite to provide an in depth programme.

The remaining courses in the Performance Management Suite build on this foundation by focussing development on specific areas. The Performance Management Suite Courses:

REVIEW AND FEEDBACK

COACHING

OBJECTIVES AND TASK SETTING

TRAINING

RECRUITMENT

Performance Management Toolkit

This course provides a practical approach and structure for managing and improving team performance and develops the skills and approaches required to achieve this successfully

It is a course that shows how to turn performance management into an everyday job – to improve performance – every day

The course takes a toolkit approach, providing lots of ideas and practical help, whilst the

Page 63: PMS

structure links Performance Management together in a compelling way.

A Great Start – Effective Recruitment and Training

Great performance starts with the bedrock of effective recruitment and training. Getting this wrong will limit performance and make a manager’s job harder. Getting this right will support good performance that is achieved sooner and with better retention.

Coaching Skills for Managers

Team members need support, encouragement, feedback and monitoring on a regular basis in order to perform. The best teams are not the ones that are left to get on with it but the ones who are coached to perform.

This course is designed to help managers perform in their role as Coach.

The Successful Appraisal

Appraisals often get bad press and can be viewed negatively both by managers and team members. However, they are an essential part of effective management and offer the potential to help, not hinder performance. This course helps you to get the most out of them.

Page 64: PMS

Performance Management gift image 1 - search ID forn476

Performance Management gift image 2 - search ID forn330

Performance Management gift image 3 - search ID forn477

Page 65: PMS

Performance Management gift image 4 - search ID forn331

Performance Management gift image 5 - search ID forn1099

Page 66: PMS
Page 67: PMS

The Scottish Government

PublicationsWednesday, December 15, 2010

Defining Enabled and Empowered - It's not just what you do, but the way that you do it.

Just as 'competent and confident' has broadened our understanding of 'training

and development', the terms enabled and empowered will help to separate out

and develop our understanding of leadership, and organisational culture and how

this influences performance and motivation.

Enabled and Empowered are best considered as two sides of the same coin.

To enable is to provide the means for a member of staff to do the job. This

means:

Defining the task or jobs to be done; Defining the role of the worker; Defining the structures, policies and procedures; Getting the 'back room' supports running smoothly; Ensuring the worker has the necessary knowledge and skills; Ensuring the worker has the right tools and equipment; Ensuring the worker has access to appropriate resources; Ensuring the worker has supervision and feedback on performance; Ensuring fair employment and reward strategies; Ensuring reasonable workloads.

To empower is to give staff the freedom and authority to use their skills,

knowledge and experience to find the best way to achieve a particular task. This

includes:

Trusting workers to exercise professional judgement and to take responsibility for decision-making and problem-solving;

Trusting workers to be responsible for balancing work requirements and lifestyle commitments;

Trusting teams to solve problems, allocate work and maximise flexibility; Supporting staff and helping them to learn from mistakes and misjudgements; Welcoming challenges to the status quo and rewarding innovation and creativity;

Page 68: PMS

Building belonging and ownership; involving workers in service planning and review, in organisational design and development and in decision-making.

Enabled workers can do what they have been told to do but empowered

workers do what needs to be done and reflect on how it could be done better next time.

Enabling without empowering is likely to cause frustration. Workers may feel

reined in and constrained to 'do things by the book'. This will stifle innovation and

creativity and is likely to lead to staff performing at a level that is 'good enough'

rather than excellent. There is likely to be a 'them and us' attitude between staff

and managers and highly motivated, high-performing staff will move to

organisations that afford them greater influence and responsibility.

Empowering without enabling is dangerous. Leaving people to get on with it is

not the same as empowering them.

Enabling and Empowering the workforce is more easily achieved when the other

components have been addressed; that is when the workforce is competent and

confident, safe and healthy, and when diversity and flexibility are valued and

positively promoted.

The following story (see page 24) presents a negative scenario to highlight the

issues around enablement and empowerment and to generate a problem-solving

approach.

Empowerment is generally explained in terms of allowing employees greater

freedom, autonomy and self-control over their work, and responsibility for

decision-making. (1)

Empowering is akin to delegation but goes much further; it is not just about

delegating responsibility but also power. Empowerment can take a number of

forms. Consider the following: (2)

Empowerment through participation: for example, the delegation of decision-

making which in a traditional organisation would be the domain of management;

Page 69: PMS

Empowerment through involvement: for example, when management's

concern is to gain employees' experiences, ideas and suggestions.

Empowerment through commitment: for example, through greater

commitment to the organisation's goals and through improved job satisfaction.

Empowerment through de-layering: for example, through reducing the number

of tiers of management.

Enabling and empowering individuals and teams to have greater autonomy

cannot happen in isolation. To ensure that service delivery is never

compromised, and service users' safety and wellbeing remain the priority, a

range of checks and balances are necessary. The prerequisites for effective

empowerment are: having a competent and confident workforce; having a safe

and healthy workforce; having a diverse and flexible workforce; and defining and

monitoring appropriate leadership and management styles and behaviours.

See the section on Management and Leadership for further discussion on this topic.

A story that paints a picture

Shona, Margaret and Brian are home care workers. They are concerned that

they have little or no back-up from managers when out doing their work, and this

is not just when they are working out of office hours. They don't have mobile

phones, and they waste a lot of time going from phone box to phone box in

attempts to raise management support. They are fed up and frustrated being told

'someone will ring back' or 'ring again in 5 minutes', but don't.

They tell of being directed to new clients without any background information on

the circumstances or needs of the individual, often to find that the service user

has dementia, nursing care requirements or mental illness. They feel it is ironic

that they are left to use their own wisdom and discretion in these circumstances,

but in the normal run of things, they are not invited to contribute to care plans,

reviews or assessments. They feel they are kept on too tight a rein to deliver to

prescribed plans, within tight timescales, without any opportunity to influence

individual care packages or the way the service is delivered. Brian was told that

Page 70: PMS

'confidentiality' prevented him from having access to information about service

users.

Sharon and Margaret have never had supervision or been involved in a team

meeting where they could share concerns or offer ideas for change and

improvement. Brian has had one or two sessions in the past 12 months but they

are ad hoc and used mainly to 'give' information on changes that are happening.

All three talk of going home 'with a knot in their stomach' because no one

responded to their request for advice and support. Sometimes they go home

deeply upset because a service user has died, especially if they were the one to

find them. They wish there was time to have a cup of tea and a talk with a

manager, or a colleague when this happens, but they usually just have to get on

to the next service user.

Quite often they go home feeling they haven't been able to do a good enough job

and sometimes their ears are ringing from the criticism, often anger, of service

users or their families; they feel they take the brunt of resource issues they have

no control over.

While 'making a difference' to people's lives had brought them into the service

and provided reward, many realised that they were afforded more influence over

the job, and the hours of work, at the local supermarket; and the pay was the

same.

Shona, Margaret and Brian have put together a report to demonstrate how they

would like to improve the service, and improve their working lives. Their

innovation and creativity is well matched by a realistic awareness of resource

constraints, and recognition that teamwork and partnership working could let

them make a bigger whole out of the parts. They are keen for greater delegated

responsibility as individuals, and as teams. They want to know why they can't just

get on with it.

Why can't they? What would be the barriers to allowing this team to have more control over the workload and how it is addressed?

Just a Minute:

Page 71: PMS

1. Put a mark on the following continuum to represent your own current position or style of leadership; put another mark to represent what you consider to be the ideal position for 21st Century Social Work and Social Care Services.

2. Where would you place your line manager and senior managers?

3. What impact might a wide variation of positions have on the effectiveness of leadership and change management? How can this be addressed?

4. What are the barriers to greater empowerment of the workforce?

1. GOOD BEGINNINGS... AND ENDINGS

Getting off to a good start:

Enabling and empowering starts at the job design stage; the way that tasks and

responsibilities are delegated and how this particular post fits within the service

or organisation as a whole, will set the scene. The same is true of when it comes

to specifying the skills, experience and qualities of the individual required.

Developing Job Briefs and Further Particulars in addition to person specifications

and job descriptions can help to tell it like it is.

Would-be employees will be looking for language that tells them clearly what is

expected of them, and how they can use their skills and energy to best effect.

They will also be looking at how this post will reward them, provide further

development opportunities, and where it might lead them in terms of career

progression. They will want to see evidence that you value diversity and respect

their work-life balance needs.

Recruitment and safe recruitment practices:

Getting the right people in the right job is an art and a science and is worth taking

time over. It is costly in financial and human terms to get it wrong. Much has

been written about safe recruitment practices in social work and social care and

guidance on methods of selection are plentiful. Where they work closely with

Page 72: PMS

operational managers, dedicated H.R. staff can do much to advise, guide and

support the process.

A safer recruitment toolkit is available from the Scottish Recruitment and

Retention Consortium. (3)

Just a Minute:

1. Are you confident that job titles, descriptions, person specifications and job briefs truly reflect what is required of the role and the individual? When a vacancy arises, do you check out with the team whether the post, in its current form, is still valid - or if a different role and set of skills improve the service?

2. Are you confident that selection methods are effective and are regularly reviewed? Are you concerned about the resource implications of doing it thoroughly? How can you make progress?

3. Do H.R. managers and staff work well with operational managers and staff to make the best of both sets of skills and knowledge? If not, how can you improve this? Would you consider shadowing each other for a day or two?

diagram 2. A closer look at some Key Components of an Enabled and Empowered Workforce

Page 73: PMS

In the next sections we will consider each of these components in turn: however,

the key to success lies in keeping addressing all the components simultaneously,

a bit like spinning plates.

1. Good Beginnings and Endings: recruitment practices; induction; supervision;

continuing professional development and exit interviews

2. Rewards: everything a person gains by working

3. Workloads and Backroom Systems: behind every good front line worker there

are processes, people and equipment behind the scenes making it happen!

4. Leadership, Management and Organisational Culture: 'how we do things here'

5. Performance Management: how we know we are doing the right things well

6. Work - Life Balance: a critical factor for staff support, performance and morale.

Page 74: PMS

Induction:

The quality of induction will influence the new recruit and the speed at which they

are able to become a fully operational member of the team. If it goes wrong in the

early days it can be hard to retrieve and the confidence and competence of the

new worker will suffer. It's worth the effort to get it right. Induction is a two-way

process and needs to be tailored to the needs of the individual. A policy and

procedure are clearly essential, but this just provides the framework on which to

write an individual plan. In this respect it is a bit like undertaking a person-centred

assessment and developing a care plan; it's the same and yet different for

everybody.

The starting point for induction is often the job interview itself. At the end of the

selection process there will be a great deal of information about the new recruit's

background, skills and experience, and also the areas in which they are less

competent and confident. Setting a date for a continuing professional

development session ( CPD) in the first week will enable this to be explored and

an action plan developed. It will also help the manager to allocate work and to

decide on the need for supervision and support. Knowing that areas for

development have been identified and those areas of weakness or inexperience

have been recognised, should boost the confidence of the new worker and

remove any fear about shortcomings being discovered. This is a learning

approach in action.

Supervision:

Supervision in social work is a crucial aspect of professional development and

workload management. There is already a wealth of information on this topic and

it would add little to explore it within this framework document. It is however

important to make the link between supervision and performance management

which is addressed elsewhere in this framework. One-to-one supervision is the

means of assessing individual performance and assisting future development; it

ensures that the performance of an individual worker is connected all the way up

to the strategic plan. It's a bit like Russian dolls with the individual worker at the

centre.

Page 75: PMS

Exit interviews:

These tell us why people left and what they thought about the job and the

organisation. They can be very informative tools and some organisations even

encourage members to do 'mock' exit interviews as a way of finding out how

satisfied they are at work and whether the actual job still matches its description.

If the supervisory relationship has been positive the exit interview should hold no

surprises but it should provide an opportunity to reflect on the wider picture

without the pressure of day-to-day matters. There is much to be learned from

aggregating information from exit interviews and looking for common issues and

patterns. Sometimes exit interviews can get lost between the operational

manager and the H.R. department and that analysis is never undertaken.

Just a Minute:

1. Are you confident about the way you manage induction? What evidence is there that new recruits have a good experience?

2. Are you doing exit interviews, and are you asking the right questions? Are there arrangements in place to aggregate and analyse findings from exit interviews and do you use this information to make changes?

3. Are there working relationships between operational managers and H.R. teams and do you help each other to monitor and evaluate recruitment and selection processes?

2. REWARD - EVERYTHING A PERSON GAINS BY WORKING

Reward is a complex issue; it is not just about pay. There is a wealth of research

that supports the view that for many people, money is not the main reward from

working. For some people time is more important than money and they would be

more interested in working for employers who offer more holidays and greater

flexibility on how that leave can be taken. Others will look for an employer that

will invest in their future development and will sacrifice pay for the opportunity to

undertake qualifying training. For many it is the intangible rewards that make the

difference; being valued and praised and given recognition for long service or

particular achievements.

Page 76: PMS

Richard Branson pays some of the lowest salaries in the industry and yet his staff

are very talented and loyal. The company's success in its field is down to his

management philosophy where all staff feel valued and he is just as interested in

a flight stewardess's opinion as he is in his Marketing Director's. Branson

believes successful people management is about inclusion and Branson works

on making all his staff like a team where each is valued not only for fulfilling their

job remit but for contributing to the development of the business as a whole. (4)

However, there is also a considerable body of evidence that when there is a

sense of unfairness or injustice about pay it zooms to the top of the agenda and

will prevent employees from seeing the 'other' rewards that are provided.

Historically, local government has had nationally negotiated pay and conditions,

with some local flexibility. Some social workers' grades together with those of

staff working in the residential sector and nursery nurses have been determined

nationally while those of other staff have been determined locally.

Since the Single Status Agreement of 1999, almost all pay and terms and

conditions are subject to local negotiation. The intention of the Scottish Joint

Council in implementing the Agreement was to recognise local variations and to

enable each employer to design jobs and structures to suit their local

circumstances. Employers can offer reward packages that reflect the local

market and fit in with the overall pay model within that authority, as well as

addressing the pressing issue of equal pay. Some parts of the sector remain of

the view, however, that local flexibility has led to unhealthy competition amongst

authorities.

This view should be considered alongside the concept of the total reward

package. There is a whole branch of human resource management devoted to

reward management and a wealth of research on the impact of different types of

reward on performance and motivation. In many industries and work groups

reward packages can include things like bonuses, shareholding, private health

care, child care and assisted travel. In the public sector the situation is simpler,

but here too it is necessary to consider a flexible approach to reward that

Page 77: PMS

recognises the diversity of the workforce and the need for people to achieve a

healthy work-life balance.

It might help to simplify the complex issue of reward if we consider three main

areas of 'gain' that employment can bring: financial security, career and status.

Just a Minute:

1. What 'rewards' are most important to you?

2. What might other members of your team consider to be most important?

3. Are you aware of any differences in attitude to working patterns and rewards between different age groups, different work groups and roles?

4. How can you test this out? Do you think that rewards and working patterns are flexible enough to respect the diversity of the workforce? Who determines the reward strategy in your organisation?

table 3. What a person gains by working for a good employer

STATUS AND VALUEFINANCIAL AND

SOCIAL REWARDS

CAREER & PERSONAL

FULFILMENT

Recognition Value

Public Support

Pay Pension

Benefits and Allowances

Continual learning

Career progression and diversity

Personal Achievement

This can be achieved by:

personal supervision long service awards achievement awards praise and thank you's care accolades or other sector

awards

This can be achieved by:

sickness, paternity and maternity allowances

flexible working

This can be achieved by:

CPD qualifying

training career pathways

Page 78: PMS

developing a positive public profile of the service and profession that lets people be proud to be part of it

developing a sense of identity and belonging

making people feel that they matter

enabling and empowering leadership and management

and family friendly policies

flexible leave arrangements

sabbaticals workplace child

care or child care vouchers

subsidised qualifying training

subsidised I.T. equipment and training

subsidised leisure facilities

free financial advice and guidance

wellbeing at work

healthy workplace

job swaps mentoring and

coaching

delegation

3. WORKLOADS AND BACKROOM SYSTEMS

Workload: Having a manageable workload that allows time for a job to be well

done are high on the list of desirables listed by staff as characterising good

workplaces. In times of high demand and high vacancies it is a key factor in

people to deciding leave their posts and look elsewhere. Meeting service

demand with finite resources is a major challenge in the care services and most

people who enter through the doors know what to expect.

Quote from a home carer:

'I feel guilty that I don't have enough time to spend on each service user; I know they would love me to stay and talk, but I just can't or I am taking someone else's time away from them'.

Quote from a Manager:

'I know what I should be doing to be a good manager and leader; I recently did the Leading to Deliver course and I want to implement what I have learned; my

Page 79: PMS

manager is supportive and we do what we can, but there is simply not enough time to put it into practice'.

Workload Management / Measurement Systems:

It sometimes feels like the search for the Holy Grail. Does anybody out there

have the ideal system or format? Many attempts have been made to weight

caseloads, determine the ideal number of cases, and account for the activity that

takes place but to date there is no particular model that has excelled to the point

of being promoted widely.

This does not mean that people don't know when 'enough is enough'; it's just a

matter of finding the right way to measure and quantify it.

Sorry, but this framework document is not going to provide an ideal model either.

But what it will do is see what can be learned from other sectors and try to unpick

everything that goes in to make up a workload; note, not caseload.

The actual workload, or service demand, is just part of the picture; how tasks are

delegated and the supports that are available to front line staff will influence the

amount of direct work that can be undertaken; a review of backroom roles and

responsibilities might assist.

Getting the Backroom Right:

Modern public service is centred around putting the needs of the service user

first. The intention is that services, assisted by technology and e-government, will

be smooth, seamless and joined-up at the point of delivery; the service user must

see only the swan gliding on the surface, not the frantic paddling of feet below

the water.

Could the same apply to supporting front line staff?

The drive is to increase the amount of time front line staff spend with service

users, and to reduce the bureaucracy; this means having backroom systems and

processes that are well thought-out, well resourced and fully integrated with the

overall service aims and standards.

Page 80: PMS

All too often the backroom makes more demands on the front line staff than it

does to service their needs. The result is that what should be in the 'backroom'

often gets between the front line worker and the service users, whether this is in

paperwork, time wasted in sorting out logistics, time wasted finding someone to

make a decision or approve resources, or failure to provide the necessary

equipment such as mobile communication systems. The upshot is pressure on

staff, and delays for service users; sometimes it spills over into the relationship

between the two.

Just a Minute:

1. How long is it since you had a good sortout of backroom processes and routines?

2. Is the development of new technology freeing up administrative staff to take on more front line staff support, or logistic tasks?

3. Are there regular and robust arrangements for administrative staff to contribute to review and planning?

Quote from a front line staff member:

'It's not the service users that wear me down, it's constantly struggling to get the right paperwork done, to get the right decisions, to get the right resources, to get management time to discuss and agree; and sometimes it's just the amount of time I waste organising taxis, finding venues for meetings and contact'.

What's the Problem?

Why do these backroom problems arise?

Sometimes it's simply a resource problem, sometimes it is because there is a

clash of policies or demands; the need to meet competing personal,

organisational and service user needs presents a serious challenge. In common

with other workgroups and industries, it might just be because we don't question

why 'we keep on doing what we do in the way that we do it' so we 'always get

what we always had', despite the changes in expectation about service delivery.

Page 81: PMS

Information from best value reviews where these fundamental questions were

asked, suggest that many administrative staff are equally frustrated. With modern

administration qualifications this workgroup are well positioned to be logistic

experts and to re-think the backroom operations; but all too often they were

working to outdated job descriptions that said ' team clerk' or 'clerk typist'. Some

do it anyway, without due reward and are often worried that they will be told off

for acting above themselves. Some speak of the frustration of watching busy

social workers waste time doing tasks that don't play to their strengths:

' I watched three different social workers order three separate taxis from the same company, for the same destination within an hour; they all got different price quotes. I would like to help, but I don't have the authority'.A team clerk

LOOKING FOR HELP:

A social worker writes to a Community Care Career Helpline:

Question:

I'm a front line worker in children and families and for the past year have found

my caseload almost unbearable. I've always got more on than I can manage and

it's really getting me down. I love the job itself and like my colleagues - the

problem is that there aren't enough of them. Despite several recruitment drives,

we never have a full team, so everyone else is in the same boat. I've tried talking

to my manager about this but she is also overworked and stressed and it always

ends up with her whingeing about her own workload. I don't want to leave but

can't carry on like this.

Answer:

Leaving is always an option but it doesn't sound like you are in the best frame of

mind to make a balanced judgement about another post or employer; you could

be jumping from the frying pan to the fire. It might be better to wait until you have

time to take leave and are in a more relaxed and objective frame of mind.

Leaving may not be the answer; in your current post you seem to have a good

team of colleagues around you and attempts are being made to recruit. Although

Page 82: PMS

it may take up even more of your hard-pressed time, you could look at ways of

improving the situation in your current post. This could just pay dividends, and if

not at least you will have the satisfaction of having taken a problem-solving

approach.

1. Define the problem more clearly:Is it the caseload or the workload that is too high? Perhaps you are spending time on tasks that could be done by someone else? Perhaps you could review the scope (or care plans) for each case to something that is realistically achievable.

2. Communicate the problem, and your proposed solutions, more effectively. Talking to a stressed and busy manager, particularly if you are emotionally charged, is not likely to be successful. Prepare a short report for your manager outlining your findings and your suggestions for reducing the workload. Use language that is positive and solution-focused.

3. Share it with the team.Encourage others to follow your lead, and work to produce a well-evidenced, coherent team report. Involve your manager if possible and avoid a 'them and us' divide. Managers need hard evidence to present to the next management tier.

4. An alternative would be to prepare an 'exit interview' report for your next supervision session outlining why you would want to leave this post and what would need to change to make you stay.

diagram 3. Behind the Face to Face Contact

Page 83: PMS

Regardless of the number of cases or tasks, workers need to invest in

connections and partnerships and in their own continuing professional

development. Some of the administrative tasks will also be fixed where these are

related to time management, diary planning, maintaining statistics and

employment-related correspondence.

How often is the time needed to do these 'other' tasks taken into account?

Probably rarely; if we did there would be copious material on formulas and

benchmarks.

Perhaps the time is right to try and quantify the time needed to address the

preparation time and prerequisites in a more formal structured manner.

Page 84: PMS

Preparation and Prerequisites:

In addition to back room administrative requirements, front line workers have a

range of time tasks and activities to complete before they even meet a service

user. Some of these are to ensure that they remain a competent worker, others

to ensure that they are up to date on policy and procedure, others to maintain

networks and contacts, and others to prepare for working directly with individual

service users.

The following model attempts to capture all that goes on to support direct contact

between social care staff and service users: it may not directly reduce the

problem but there should be some comfort in recognising the pressures and

celebrating all that is achieved despite constraints.

4. MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP

Warning! Management and Leadership are vast subjects that can only be touched upon in this document; the intention is to challenge your thinking, help you work out what you already know and believe, and what you need to develop further. The approach taken and the material quoted is in keeping with the content of the Scottish Executive's 'Leading to Deliver' programme which is delivered in partnership with the Scottish Leadership Foundation.

Having competent and enabling managers is fundamental to staff wellbeing,

motivation and satisfaction. It's a fact; the literature, research and evidence is

weighty. When it comes to determining what makes a good manager and leader,

the pool of knowledge and evidence widens further.

A survey of more than 2000 workers across the social care workforce, at all

levels of seniority, was carried out by Community Care in October 2003. It found

that having a poor relationship with their manager was the top reason for people

leaving a job (90%) and having poor senior support and advice was the sixth top

(75%). On the positive side having a good relationship with the manager was the

third top reason for staying in a job (89%). (5)

Page 85: PMS

Views gathered as part of the Supporting Front Line Staff Initiative concur with

those expressed in other surveys and research. What people want most from

their managers is:

availability âšwillingness to listen doing what they say they will do responding in good time making decisions and not procrastinating telling it like it is; above and below being an advocate for the team recognising their potential trusting them to do a good job but not abandoning them to their own devices.

Some frequently heard comments at Supporting Front Line Staff consultation events:

'My own line manager is fantastic, she really puts herself out to be there for me; but she gets no support herself; if it wasn't for her I wouldn't stay'.

'I've only seen the Director in a newsletter and the only time we see other senior

managers is when something has gone wrong and we are in trouble'.

'Senior managers come on a royal visit sometimes, inviting us to meet with them;

but it feels like we are poles apart; we don't understand what they do all day, and

I am sure they don't understand what we do, or at least the daft questions they

ask suggest they don't'.

'My manager won't come out of his room and the door is usually shut; he rarely

asks how I am getting on and when I start to tell him, he just sort of glazes over

and makes 'there there' noises; it makes me so mad I could shake him and I

decide it's better not to bother'.

These examples highlight a mixture of management and leadership issues.

Defining Management and Leadership

Put most simply:

Management: is what managers do

Page 86: PMS

Leadership: is how managers do it

Ask a room full of people to define leadership and expect a host of responses

including: it's a role, a status, a calling, an approach, a personality trait, a set of

skills and behaviours, a set of beliefs and way of being.

Ask them how to define management or management style and some will wax

eloquent on various theories, models and approaches; but there will also be

some head scratching, pondering and admissions that they don't really know, or

that what they do 'is natural', or they haven't had time to think about it. Some will

find it difficult to distinguish between leadership and management. Others will

provide a summary of their organisation's vision for good people management,

based on a set of standards or competencies that define desired behaviours.

Hollingsworth (6) identifies six fundamental differences between leadership and

management:

A manager manages - a leader innovates A manager maintains - a leader develops A manager focuses on systems and structure - a leader focuses on people A manager relies on control - a leader inspires trust A manager keeps an eye on the bottom line - a leader has an eye on the horizon A manager does things right - a leader does the right things.

In reality leadership and management overlap and while separating them out

aids understanding, they are two sides of the same coin.

In a paper on Change and the Public Sector, the CIPD(7) suggests that the public

sector needs to undergo a fundamental shift from traditional command and

control styles of management to a high-performance model based on autonomy

and trust. Although this view was based on reliable evidence, many would argue

that leadership in modernised public services is no longer of a command and

control nature.

Which of the following, defined by Likert(8), most closely resembles the management system where you work?

Page 87: PMS

Exploitative authoritative: Decisions are imposed, motivation is usually based

on threats, there is very little teamwork or communication; responsibility is

centred at the top of the organisational hierarchy. (Low Trust)

Benevolent authoritative: There is a condescending form of leadership,

motivation is based on a system of rewards, there is only limited team work, or

communication; there is responsibility at managerial levels but not at lower levels

of the organisational hierarchy.

Consultative: Leadership involves some trust in subordinates, motivation is

based on rewards but also some involvement, there is a fair degree of teamwork

and communication takes place vertically and horizontally; responsibility for

achieving the goals of the organisation is more widely spread through the

hierarchy.

Participative: Leadership involves trust and confidence in subordinates,

motivation is based on rewards for achievement of agreed goals, there is

participation and a high degree of teamwork and communication; responsibility

for achieving the goals of the organisation is widespread throughout the

hierarchy. (High Trust)

In addition to the prevailing management system, individual managers will have

their own personal management styles and approaches. Look at the following

definitions by Watson (9) and reflect on how much these are true for you, your

colleagues and your managers.

Management as Art, Science, Magic and Politics(9)

Management as Art: Successful managers are those born with appropriate

intuition, intelligence and personality which they develop through the practice of

leadership.

Management as Science: Successful managers are those who have learned

the appropriate body of knowledge and have developed an ability to apply

acquired skills and techniques.

Page 88: PMS

Management as Magic: Successful managers are those who recognise that

nobody really knows what is going on and who persuade others of their own

powers by calling up the appropriate gods and engaging in expected rituals.

Management as Politics: Successful managers are those who can work out the

unwritten laws of life in the organisational jungle and are able to play the game

so that they can win.

A successful manager is likely to be the one who can cover all these bases and

knows when it is most appropriate to use each aspect.

In the social care sector people are often promoted because they are

professionally or technically good and they have good people skills; but this does

not necessarily prepare them for the job of managing in the complex, multi-

faceted organisational structures of social care. New managers often replicate

the attitudes and behaviours of their managers, which may be no longer

appropriate.

So what is appropriate leadership for 21st Century Social Care?

Modern public service requires managers to be good at motivating, influencing,

empowering, negotiating, collaborating and maintaining effective partnerships.

The thrust of this framework document is to recognise that staff are the key to

improved services and that they should experience enabling and empowering

leadership that will maximise:

diversity and flexibility confidence and competence wellbeing and work-life balance.

Underpinning all of these are the ten key principles about people management in

chapter three of this framework.

It is about getting the best management and leadership 'fit' for the complexity of

modern social care organisations and the way that the nature of change. It is

about leadership that connects with people at both head and heart levels,

sometimes called emotionally intelligent leadership.

Page 89: PMS

There are many models and theories to choose from, some of more relevance

than others to the public sector. For our purposes here it is useful to consider two

different approaches: transformational and transactional leadership. (10)

A transformational leader aims to change the values of the organisation. This

kind of leader:

creates a vision of the future inspires others by communicating this vision enthusiastically encourages others to think afresh and encourages them to question current ways

of doing things coaches people to help them be responsible for their own development and

effectiveness.

This kind of leader helps people reach an understanding of the complexity of

issues, and the means to transform their understanding and behaviour. It is about

empowering people to manage change for themselves. It's not far removed from

the notion of 'giving a man a fish and feeding him for the day, or giving him a

fishing rod so he can fish every day'.

On the other hand, more traditional 'transactional' leadership behaviour seeks to

obtain effective performance within agreed assumptions, practices and rules of

the organisation. Transactional leaders plan, organise, direct, co-ordinate, report

and budget.

Transformational Leadership is 'doing the right thing'; transactional leadership is 'doing things right'.(11)

One of the U.K's leading thinkers on leadership in the Public Sector is Beverley

Alimo-Metcalfe. (12) She has carried out considerable research and the essence of

her thinking is that leaders encompass three broad areas:

1. Leading and Developing Others

has a genuine concern for their wellbeing and development; empowers, delegates and develops potential accessible, approachable, in touch encourages questioning and critical strategic thinking.

2. Personal Qualities

Page 90: PMS

transparency, honesty and consistency integrity and openness to ideas and advice decisive and risk-taking charismatic, in touch analytical and creative thinker.

3. Reading the Organisation

inspirational communicator, networker and achiever clarifies individual and team direction, priorities and purpose unites through a joint vision creates a supportive learning and self-development environment manages changes sensitively and skillfully.

This and many of the other ideas and concepts have been taken from a national

'Leading to Deliver' programme funded by the Scottish Executive and attended

by managers from all sectors.

The Leading to Deliver programme covers the key aspects of leadership:

changing self to lead leading for change leading to deliver leading through effective relationships.

Just a Minute:

1. How confident are you that your management and leadership style is the best fit for the task, and to manage change? Do you have an action plan as part of CPD?

2. How well do you score yourself against the Alimo-Metcalfe framework? How would others score you? How would you score your own manager(s)?

3. How much time do you spend on managing tasks and how much leading people, or planning to be an effective leader? What can you do about this?

4. Prepare a 30-second commercial in which you convince your team why you are worthy of being their leader.

5. PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Page 91: PMS

Performance management means different things to different people; to some it

suggests indicators, statistics and spreadsheet; for others it is linked negatively

to performance-related pay or disciplinary proceedings. It's a pity that it often gets

bad press, because it is one of the most supportive tools in the kit bag for

supporting front line staff and managing them well.

Consultation with front line staff across Scotland as part of the Supporting Front

Line Staff Initiative revealed that staff wanted more performance management;

that is, they wanted to know how well they were doing, how they could improve,

and they wanted to be assured that what they were doing was making a

difference. In their words they wanted clear standards and expectations, they

wanted supervision and appraisal and they wanted their CPD needs to be

addressed. They also wanted to know the reasons behind changes to working

practices or services and they wanted to know if they could influence those

changes.

Sometimes in large organisations it is hard for staff to make this connection up

through many layers to the strategy level, and their satisfaction rests with the

approval and confirmation given at middle manager levels.

There are many definitions of performance management, some of them

extremely technical and daunting. The following is a commonly used, and fairly

simple definition. (13)

'The real concept of performance management is associated with an approach to

creating a shared vision of the purpose and aims of the organisation, helping

each employee understand and recognise their part in contributing to them, and

in so doing, manage and enhance the performance of the individual and the

organisation'.

This sounds like a good fit with transformational leadership, enabling and

empowering management and a commitment to diversity; the dots are joining up.

At the Scottish Executive, performance is defined in the following terms:

Ensure that what we do is guided by our values and is relevant to the purposes of the organisation

Page 92: PMS

Ensure that we are all clear how to demonstrate the skills, knowledge and behaviours that are expected of us

Ensure that we are clear what our individual role is, and how we intend to fulfil it Link our job roles and individual objectives to the organisational objectives and

priorities set out in the management plan Ensure that all managers agree and review objectives, priorities and

developmental needs of team members Review performance against objectives and areas of competence to ensure that we

are making the best possible contribution to the organisation's overall aim Ensure that all team members receive constructive feedback in order to develop

and improve performance Ensure that a thorough review of training and development takes place as an

integral part of the system so that PDPs reflect both business and individual aims Ensure that poor performance is identified quickly and support is provided to

eliminate it. (14)

Modern performance management is an inclusive process; it's not just about

checking up on people. It is a multi-dimensional activity and the measurement

varies depending on a variety of factors. It is complex and brings in its train a

whole range of specific techniques and methodologies. There are quantitative as

well as qualitative aspects and yes this does involve gathering a host of data,

measuring it and providing detailed reports. But, as with change management

and project management, much of this work should be hidden from the average

front line worker's eye; it is a smooth backroom process. Perhaps early attempts

at improving performance management at the macro level were rather clumsy

and convoluted and put people off; a bit like over-complicated project

management methodology did for that cause.

A simple analogy is to consider performance management being like a set of

Russian dolls, each fitting in to the other, each important in itself but not complete

until it has formed a whole. It's about layering up, but also ensuring that everyone

knows what they are a part of. The measures and variables get more complex at

each level; the skill is in knowing what to measure on each of the layers, and

ensuring that these are compatible.

You have to define what you expect of performance before you can measure it;

this involves setting standards and determining indicators that will show if you are

en route to achieving them. It's about measuring results, but also the processes

Page 93: PMS

and behaviours that get those results. It is also about measuring what we do

today while planning for measuring what we will be doing tomorrow.

The front line staff member needs to have supervision, both professional and

business, ongoing performance review and CPD. Appraisal is a form of annual

performance review but it too has negative connotations from the past when

perhaps it was top-down, expectations of performance were not clearly laid out,

and feedback was more subjective opinion than fact. There was a scene in a

television drama just last week that showed a worker getting nervous and

anxious about his appraisal. While changing into his best clothes he was

desperately trying to hide what he hadn't done and to think up 'clever lines' to

make up for any shortfall. This is likely to be a million miles from your experience

of appraisal, but these images are pervasive, especially if you remember that is

how it used to be.

diagram 4. The Performance - Management Cycle

This framework does not have the scope to compare and consider the most

effective individual performance methods or schemes. But a few key principles

should underpin whatever process is adopted:

Individual performance assessment is a time to reflect over a given period,

usually a year, and to assess whether the job that they have been doing still fit

with the one on the paper, what and why changes have occurred, which aspects

Page 94: PMS

are more to the fore than others. It is also to consider whether skills and

experience have been adequate, and what CPD has taken place to improve

them. It is to review how this post and skill-set fits within the service plan, and to

highlight changes that may affect services. The time should be divided evenly

between looking back and looking forward. It is a process, not an event.

Performance management at individual and organisational levels share the same

process (see diagram 4).

Using an Excellence Model to manage, plan and deliver services:

A number of public service organisations find The European Foundation for

Quality Management ( EFQM) Excellence Model (see table 4) useful when

assessing current performance and planning improvements. (15) At its heart, the

model is based on the premise that learning and innovation are key to change

and improvement.

A learning organisation needs to look both beyond its organisational boundaries

and review within them. It needs to concentrate on the problems and

opportunities of changing environments, and look at new approaches and ideas

for solving problems. The model identifies:

Enablers - how we do things, and

Results - what we target, measure and achieve.

The model requires self assessment and action planning across eight criteria.

Underpinning concepts:

Leadership and Constancy of Purpose: The behaviour of leaders creates a

clarity and unity of purpose and an environment in which people can excel.

People Development and Involvement: The full potential of people is best

released through shared values and a culture of trust and empowerment which

encourages the involvement of everyone.

Page 95: PMS

Continuous Learning, Innovation and Improvement: Performance is

maximised when it is based on the management and sharing of knowledge within

a culture of continuous learning, innovation and improvement.

Partnership Development: Developing mutually beneficial relationships, build

on trust, sharing of knowledge and integration with partners.

Management by Processes and Facts: Inter-related activities are understood

and systematically managed and decisions concerning current operations and

planned improvements are made using reliable information that includes

stakeholder perceptions.

Customer Focus: The customer, or service user, is the final arbiter of service

quality and provision and services are provided on the basis of meeting current

and potential service user needs.

Results Orientation: Excellence is dependent upon balancing and satisfying the

needs of all; this includes the people employed, service users, suppliers and

society in general as well as those providing the funding.

Public Responsibility: The long-term interests of the organisation and its

people are best served by adopting an ethical approach and exceeding the

expectations and regulations of the community at large.

table 4. EFQM Excellence Model

Just a Minute:

Page 96: PMS

1. To what extent has a performance culture been developed in your organisation?

2. Is it clear how individual workers' activity and achievement contributes to the wider strategic plan?

3. Is your attitude to performance appraisal positive?

4. What are the barriers to implementing appraisal in your organisation? How can you overcome these?

6. WORK - LIFE BALANCE: THE CRITICAL FACTOR

The concept of work-life balance underpins all good staff support and people

management.

The term is used to describe working practices that aim to support the needs of

staff in achieving a balance between their home and working lives.

When staff have greater control of their working lives and can fit in all the other

aspects of life without feeling guilty about robbing time from Peter to pay Paul,

they will have more focus and energy for the job. And, when employers are

actively supporting them to do this, staff are likely to be loyal, committed,

retained, and off sick less. Work - life balance policies should sit alongside those

promoting wellness at work and diversity.

Employers of Choice are taking a proactive approach and demonstrating how

they are working to get it right. They know it makes sense to respect the need for

a healthy balance between work and non-work activity; and that the balancing, or

tipping point, will be different for each individual according to their age and stage

of life and circumstances. While fairness and equity are paramount, individual

circumstances must be recognised.

There are legal obligations to be met by employers but the approach can be

reactive or proactive depending on the mind set and commitment of individual

workers, the organisation, and even the country.

Page 97: PMS

Workers in the U.K. work longer hours than most of their European counterparts

and it's not just putting in the hours, it is also about having high workloads. A

survey, undertaken by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development

(2004), shows that one in five people take work home almost every day. The

survey also revealed that one in three partners of people who typically work more

than 48 hours a week feel that this has had a negative effect on personal

relationships. Technology has enabled many to be continuously accessible, but

this comes at a cost.

Work - Life balance practices are a combination of:

Legislation Parenting and Carer Policies Flexible Working Practices.

The challenge is to join up the policy dots to make a holistic framework for people

management. There is a constant need to ensure that communication goes

beyond giving details about specific provision without capturing hearts and minds

on the intent behind pieces of legislation, regulation and practice.

Improving Work - Life Balance

Effective work-life balance requires trust between employers and employees,

particularly in the area of flexible working. It requires employers and line

managers to be committed to the basic principle that staff want to give of their

best at work and will do so in the right conditions. This takes courage and

commitment at the best of times, but managers who believe that staff will take

liberties, or cannot be trusted to regulate their hours and workload, need to do

some work on their own management style and approach first.

This is not to underplay the need for effective goal setting, performance

management, supervision and support. On the contrary, robust performance

management at organisational and individual levels is a prerequisite for trust and

empowerment to flourish.

Some nuts and bolts:

Page 98: PMS

The concept of work - life balance has brought about many policy changes and

has influenced legislation. While Human Resource, or Personnel Officers will

hold the detailed knowledge, all managers should be aware of the legislation that

underpins the policy, and how this might be interpreted in a positive and

proactive way that aids staff support and retention.

Human Rights Act 2000

This takes into consideration the concept of work-life balance as it addresses the

respect for family and private life.

Equal Pay Act 1970

This states that pay should be equal for both men and women.

Race Relations Act 1974

This act ensure no discrimination of race on the basis of ethnic origin.

Sex Discrimination Act 1975

Legislates against discrimination on the ground of sex in full- and part-time

employment, training and other related matters.

Disability Discrimination Act 1995

Work-Life Balance policies must be consistent with the requirements of this act.

Working Time Regulations 1998

This has a direct impact on working practice by reducing excessively long

working hours.

Employment Relations Act 1999

This act aims to provide the balance between work and home life for the

employee. It provides employees with rights to parental leave, time off in family

emergencies and improved maternity rights.

Part-Time Workers Regulations 2000

Page 99: PMS

This enables people to work part-time at all skills levels and responsibility without

discrimination.

Work-life balance provisions, much of it driven by EU directives, were

significantly extended in April 2003 to cover annual leave; working time; parental

leave; time off for dependent care; maternity leave; paternity leave; adoption

leave; right to request flexible working; and, part-time working.

Find out what these mean for you and your workers, either internally or by

following the links and references at the end of the section.

We already see a shift from people thinking about 'going to their work' to

'working'. It might seem a small shift in perspective, but is a shift that can achieve

a great deal of change. The constraints of fixed working hours and fixed work

locations might be holding back improved performance and innovation.

As E-Government gathers momentum, technology will allow more to be done

away from a fixed base. This could help resolve accommodation and travel

problems. It is recognised that in social work and social care, team work and

colleague support is essential; but there are more creative ways of bringing

people and teams together, perhaps in environments that are more conducive to

the purpose.

Good people managers recognise that the way to employee engagement and

commitment is to give people freedom and control to make choices; and they

know it will be returned. What people want and what organisations want are

usually compatible. (16)(see table 5)

Flexible Working:

Flexible working practices are a way to achieving work- life balance. This is a

term that means many different things to people. To some it means being able to

start or finish work earlier than the standard 9 - 5 day, while at the other end of

the spectrum it means having no fixed core hours and individuals and teams

allocate time to meet the needs of the service while getting the best fit with their

own circumstances.

Page 100: PMS

It can also mean:

Part-Time Working Job Sharing Working from Home Term Time Only Working Annualised Hours Nine-Day Fortnights Career Breaks Sabbaticals Study Leave Compressed Hours Mobile Working Job Rotation Secondments for career development Secondments for community or voluntary activity.

table 5.

People want to: Organisations want to:

Enjoy life and work, achieve success and

excel at what they do

Engage people and enable,

encourage and reward outstanding

performance

Do work they care about on their own termsProvide enriching services tailored to

individual need

Create and express a unique professional

identity as themselves

Create and build a distinctive positive

image for the profession

Find the right organisation and role that

suits them best

Find the best people and match them

to the right roles

Use their skills, stretch themselves and

develop new abilities in their professional

and personal lives

Use the skills of their people to

improve effectiveness and to achieve

excellent services

Make a valued and recognised contribution Enable and reward contribution and

Page 101: PMS

to organisations that understand their

lifestyle and work style needssupport staff

Flexible working is a way of managing people, not just a set of policies. Flexible working policies can quickly become dated, or end up being just as

inflexible as the previous way of doing things. The options outlined above will suit

some of the people some of the time, and some organisations at given points in

their history. It's a fluid and dynamic activity.

The social care sector is continuing to diversify its workforce to match the

diversity of the population and integrated service delivery; recruiting from a

diverse set of skills and geographies will require a more open approach and

tolerance of different life and work styles.

The key task is to grasp the underpinning principles of good people management

and to look for ways to maximise flexibility and work-life balance, while continuing

to put service needs first. This emphasises the need for close collaboration

between H.R. staff and operational managers; by working together and sharing

knowledge and skills legislation, policy and practice can be used to best effect to

create a positive 'can do' culture.

In summary, flexible working practices enable and empower staff to give of their

best; in return they will perform well and be responsive to the need for flexible

services. Flexible working practices will promote the wellbeing of the workforce

and have a positive knock-on effect on sickness and absence. They will increase

openness and trust and give workers a sense of ownership and responsibility,

reducing 'them and us' divisions between managers and staff. This will all add to

workers' feelings of confidence and competence and will increase their

commitment and loyalty.

Effective implementation depends on commitment to all four key components of

good staff support to ensure a social care workforce that is:

enabled and empowered confident and competent flexible and diverse safe and healthy.

Page 102: PMS

Just a Minute:

1. How developed are flexible working practices in your organisation?

2. Are there differences in the way policy is applied in different work groups, and is the reason for this clear?

3. Are there any conflicts between flexible working practices and service needs? Is anyone or any group addressing this issue? If not, how could this best be done?

Flexible working in Fife

Fife Council Social Work Services was successful in securing funding from the

DTI Partnership Fund to encourage flexible working. Pilot studies have been

successful and barriers to further development identified. Here is a quick

summary of some of the feedback: For further information contact

[email protected]

Teams described their findings in terms of the following benefits:

Feeling more in control of the workload Improved continuity and consistency of contact with clients and relatives of

clients in residential settings The team are much happier Being able to spend more time with the children which has also reduced child care

costs Knowing we've got time off keeps us motivated and our spirits high, making the

job more manageable, even though we're running with a lot of vacant posts Being able to deal with work requiring quiet concentration outside normal office

hours, so I'm not disturbed all the time by phone calls Staff are generally less tired, so when they come to work they are refreshed and

work more effectively Morale is higher Staff are communicating more effectively There's a buzz about the place People are nicer to each other and work more co-operatively.

Managers were able to report the following:

Reduced backlog of paperwork

Page 103: PMS

Cases allocated increased over the summer months, which would not normally be expected during the holiday season

Increased available time for supervision Reduction in the use of relief staff of between 10 and 20 hours per week Decline in the number of simple administrative errors Offering an extended service between 8am and 6pm Reduced short-term absence.

The general comment is that, in practice, managing flexibility is not as difficult as

anticipated, as team members are cooperating with each other to manage

service requirements and individual working preferences. The following is a

typical manager response: 'Contrary to my initial feelings, this has proved to be a

very positive experience and I would not now like to see a return to the previous

working practice.'

Overcoming the barriers. Staff have identified certain barriers to working non-

standard patterns:

Buildings being open evenings and weekends; cost implications. Laptop provision; increased laptop provision would make it easier for staff to

work more flexibly; cost/policy issue. Access to files - policy on whether files can be removed from the office needs to

be clarified. Impact on clerical/support staff - some staff have voiced the concern that

increased flexibility for certain categories of worker places constraints on the flexibility of clerical/support staff. It is clearly important to involve support staff in discussions about changed working patterns. While not everybody can have the same flexibility (e.g home working) most could achieve some flexibility if they want it.

Further Reading:

Work - Life Balance?

or Life - Work Balance?

In his book about the new rules of employee engagement, Mike Johnson (16)

suggests that it is time to reverse the word order and make 'Life - Work' the

priority. Why? Because he believes that work-life balance isn't working and the

emphasis is still too much on work coming first.

Page 104: PMS

This is an interesting text that highlights the differences in attitude to work and

expectations of the life - work balance across the generations. In a humorous but

enlightening chapter on 'it's their lifestyle not your lifestyle that counts', he makes

a compelling argument for employers to recognise that younger employees in

particular will always put their life before your work.

Johnson's views are in keeping with the notion that employers must meet the

individual needs of employees and that one size will not fit all. He proposes, and

evidences, that different generations in the workplace have different

understandings of the employment contract and have varying expectations of

what work should give to them. While additional pay might be the most important

form of reward for one member of staff, additional time off might be the chosen

reward for another.

At different ages and stages, workers will have demands as parents, carers or

learners. Health and wellbeing will fluctuate as will demands on finances. The

task is to track and match the different situations and expectations. The balance

of giving may be greater on the employers' side this year, but reversed next. If

you don't give you may lose staff altogether; staff losses through dissatisfaction

damages both purse and reputation.

The social care sector is committed to personal care plans for its service users

that are regularly reviewed and resourced; a similar commitment to personal

employment plans should also be the ambition for workers.

Other factors that enable and empower are addressed under the most appropriate chapters:

Working Environment: Safe and Healthy

Wellbeing at Work: Safe and Healthy

Flexible Working: Flexible and Diverse

Managing Change Effectively: Flexible and Diverse.

Footnotes

Page 105: PMS

(1) Laurie J Mullins: Management and Organisational Behaviour Seventh Edition,

FT Prentice Hall 2005, ISBN 0-273-68876-6

(2) C. Lashley, in Mullins: Management and Organisational Behaviour, page 886

(3) Safer Recruitment and Selection for Staff Working in Child Care: Scottish

Recruitment and Selection Consortium, Crown Copyright 2001, ISBN

0755901797

(4) In Mullins: Management and Organisational Behaviour, page 255

(5) Community Care Workforce Survey: 30.7.04

(6) J.M. Hollingsworth 'Purpose and Values' in Mullins: Management and

Organisational Behaviour, page 284

(7) The Change Agenda: Why Central Targets Miss the Mark: Simon Caulkin

Management Editor/The Observer for CIPD 2003

(8) R. Likert, in Mullins: Management and Organisational Behaviour, page 245

(9) T.J. Watson: Management, Organisation and Employment Strategy.

Routledge Keegan & Paul 1986

(10) In Leading to Deliver: Taylor Clarke Partnership for the Scottish Executive

2003

(11) Bennis and Nanus (in Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge 1985), in

Leading to Deliver: Taylor Clarke Partnership for the Scottish Executive 2003

(12) Beverley Alimo-Metcalfe, in Mullins: Management and Organisational

Behaviour, page 388

(13) C. Fletcher: Appraisal: Routes to Improved Performance (1993a) London

CIPD, in Performance Management The New Realities: Armstrong and Baron,

2000 page 8

(14) Scottish Executive statement, in Managing Performance Management in

Action: Armstrong and Barron 2004 CIPD

(15) European Foundation for Quality Management EFQM Registered

Trademark 1999

(16) Mike Johnson: The New Rules of Engagement Life-Work Balance and

Employee Commitment CIPD 2004, page 6

Page 106: PMS

Performance Management

The Performance Management Cycle

OverviewThe goal of the Performance Management Process at DU is to ensure that

supervisors and employees understand and communicate openly about job

performance, goals and timelines, and how to help employees develop the skills

and abilities that they need to achieve performance goals and be successful at

the University.

Performance reviews for appointed staff are conducted at least annually, most

frequently in early fall. The reviews are based upon the goals and standards set

out in the Performance Evaluation and Development System (PEDS). Faculty

have a review process, but it is not currently conducted using the PEDS online

system.

The supervisor and employee have equal responsibility to contribute to the

performance review process. Both should understand the job responsibilities, job

goals, and the related standards against which actual performance will be

evaluated. The completion of the performance goal setting takes part in two

stages:

Page 107: PMS

Stage One: Getting Started: Setting Duties, Goals and Standards for Performance and Development

At the beginning of the review cycle (often as part of the previous year's

review) supervisors and employees define essential duties and

responsibilities, performance goals (job goals) and development goals,

and standards for measuring achievement of these goals.

The following sections of the PEDS online form should be completed in

Stage One:

1. Essential duties and responsibilities (and measurement standards for these)

2. Job goals (and measurement standards for these) 3. Competencies 4. Development goals (and measurement standards for these) 5. Weighting of Duties, Goals and Competencies

This is done with the aid of the employee's position description, keeping in

mind departmental goals for the upcoming year.

New employees and their managers should complete performance and

development goals and standards within the first 60 days of employment.

NOTE: In the same way that setting performance goals is important, we

encourage managers and employees to set development goals that are

specific, performance-related, and aligned with departmental goals. DU

Training and Development is available to consult with managers,

individuals or unit groups to identify relevant and appropriate development

opportunities within and beyond the University. Through performance

consulting, we will also partner with you to identify performance support

needed to ensure that individual and departmental goals are achieved.

Stage Two: Reviewing Performance and Development Goal Accomplishments In order to provide continuous feedback on how employees are meeting or

exceeding expectations on their essential duties, and to monitor the

progress of meeting defined goals, supervisors and their employees

Page 108: PMS

should meet for Quarterly Discussions.  We recommend that the

discussions take place in January, April and July each year.

Stage Three: Year-End Performance ReviewsAt the end of the review cycle (often as part of the previous year's review)

supervisors and employees review the performance and development

goals, evaluating accomplishments based on the standards and timelines

that were established at the beginning of the year. The review (Stage

Three) should include completion of the following sections of the PEDS

online form:

1. Employee Self-Assessment (for essential duties, job goals and development goals 2. Evaluation of actual performance (for essential duties, job goals and

development goals) 3. Measurement rating (using the 5-point rating scale) 4. Narrative comments

NOTE: Without a completed review in PEDS, an employee will not be eligible for a merit increase.

Page 109: PMS

The Performance Management Cycle

Individual Reports

Page 110: PMS

learning & development

Manage your employee training/learning easily and efficiently, with 24/7 online access.

Generate real-time reports to establish the status and statistics of current and completed employee learning and development activities.The optional Learning Management Module enables you to:

Populate a Learning & Development (L&D) Library with your company-specific learning interventions/activities (internally or externally provided).

Manage your employee Personal Development Plans (PDPs) online (accessible by HR, managers and employees, according to client-defined system settings and access privileges).

Apart from listed learning activities, selected from the L&D Library, unique learning activities for individuals can also be added to their PDPs, such as on-the-job coaching, job rotation, special assignments, projects, etc.

L&D Reports can be produced at all company levels - on demand and in real time - to see who needs what type of training, who had undergone certain types of training, what training is overdue, etc.

Reports can be generated by unit/department, location, job title, employee, line manager, target group, attainment, status, and L&D activity, or any combination of these.

Training histories are permanently archived in the system database for easy access at any time, and for year-round internal and external audit preparedness, and to ensure organization-wide training/learning compliance.

The Learning Management Module is an add-on module to Performance Advantage (regular performance appraisals) or the Smart360 (360 feedback) System/Module - independently, or jointly, should all these modules be required by a client. However, it can also be utilized as a standalone system in it own right.

Page 111: PMS

Performance   Management / Appraisal System Design Consultation by William Gresse

Convert your business plans and strategies into a framework of balanced performance indicators (or KPI's). Indicators that focus you and your people on what makes your business tick.

Performance Management (the successor of Management By Objectives or MBO) is the essence of managing, and the primary "vehicle" for getting the desired results through employees at all levels in the organisation. In the absence of such a system, staff members are unclear as to the employer's expectations regarding performance objectives and standards/targets, leading to low productivity, costly mistakes, stress, de-motivation, and conflict. A sound Performance Management Process/System subscribe to the crucial Principle: "What gets measured gets done".

The days of having a "one-set-of-measures-fits-all"  Performance Management System are long gone and inherently flawed. Performance objectives and measures need to be specific to job categories and individual roles.

They should also clearly link to Organisational Strategic Goals. We subscribe to the Balanced Scorecard KPI technology to ensure a proper balance in the types of measures (based on four perspectives of the business) used at corporate level, and cascaded down to the lowest position. This ensures vertical and horisontal alignment and integration of the key performance measures throughout the organisation to ensure optimal productivity and bottom-line results.

The Performance Management Cycle involves Four Stages:

1. PLANNING PERFORMANCE: Formulating Objectives, Key Performance Indicators (KPI's: Input and Output-based), and Performance Standards (Quantitative, Qualitative, Behavioural) and Targets for each position/employee, using a suitably designed Performance Agreement Form.

2. MANAGING PERFORMANCE:Performance observation, measurement, recording, feedback and coaching, as well as managing the performance environment. This stage includes Performance Coaching and Counselling whenever employee performance or behaviour is not up to standard/expectation.

3. APPRAISING (REVIEWING) PERFORMANCE:Using a suitably designed Performance Appraisal Form that facilitates the smooth running of appraisal interviews (See our Constructive Performance Appraisals Workshop).

Page 112: PMS

4. REWARDING PERFORMANCE: Linking actual performance to appropriate rewards/remuneration to reinforce excellence in performance. (We assist organisations in designing suitable reward/incentive systems or schemes for their employees.)

GOAL SETTING THEORY SAYS:

Specific Goals/Objectives increase performance, and challenging goals, when accepted by jobholders, result in

higher performance than easy goals

Merit Pay / BonusesWhile probably the most widely used approach to reward employees for excellent performance, merit pay is also fraught with dangers if not applied properly.

Specific problems include perceived inequity, lack of fairness and transparency, bias, stereotyping, subjective judgements, rating errors, favouritism, etc.

Reasons for this typically include poorly identified and formulated performance measures, poor performance tracking and reporting, lack of performance feedback, coaching and training, poor timing of merit rewards, poor linkage between merit pay and actual performance, and a host of other factors.

The result is frequently conflict during Performance Appraisals. No small wonder that both line managers and staff members generally hate Performance Appraisal time!

One thing managers will always tell you they need is to have a Performance

Page 113: PMS

Appraisal System where the subjectivity regarding actual performance is largely removed. HR and line also crave to have a system where the calculation of merit bonuses for all staff is easily understood, perceived as being fair, and devoid of potential unhappiness and conflict.

The "Reward-Behaviour-Performance" Link

Organisations have to be very careful in deciding what performance or behaviour they reward, and be acutely aware of potential unintended consequences. Behavioural psychology says that you will get what you reward, even that which you did not foresee at the time (e.g. negative behaviour of some sort). The timing of rewards also forms part of this equation, as do many other performance-related factors that affect human behaviour.

We have many years experience working with these Performance Management and Human Behaviour principles, and can assist you in the design of a Performance Management System that addresses all the issues mentioned above - reinstating its main purpose, namely to increase staff performance and motivation, and to impact on the organisation's bottom line.

The MOST IMPORTANT OBJECTIVES of a well-designed Performance Management System:

To serve as the primary vehicle for implementing organisational goals and strategies (cascaded from top to bottom throughout the organisation)

To align and integrate the objectives and key performance measures (KPI/s) of the organisation vertically and horisontally through all job categories and levels, including management. In this way the entire system works together in pointing towards the critical bottom line MEASURES, with bottom line RESULTS following as a matter of course ("What gets measured gets done").

To facilitate continuous performance improvement, organisation development and culture change

To achieve quality and efficiency, i.e. to meet the customer's needs as precisely, quickly and cheaply as possible

To ensure clarity regarding work expectations and performance standards, reducing job holder anxiety/stress, resource wastage and conflict

To continually enhance employee competence through the identification of output-related training and development needs and strategies

To reduce Line Manager reluctance and fear to do Performance Appraisals with their staff

To facilitate performance-based remuneration and rewards, so employees can see and experience a clear link between their performance and the rewards they receive

New Zealand Herald, 4 October 2004

Page 114: PMS

ON WORKPLACE STRESS:

"Industrial Psychologist Steward Forsyth pointed out that eliminating role ambiguity - giving workers clear instructions about what was expected of them - would rid the workplace of major sources of stress"

Not only is the existence of a sound Performance Management and Appraisal/Review System an OPERATIONAL PREREQUISITE for achieving organisational goals, but also a LEGAL REQUIREMENT to prove that proper/due process was followed (backed by sound documentation) when eventually disciplining, and especially dismissing, a staff member for persistent poor performance.

Designing Performance Management Systems from scratch We are specialists in designing Performance Management Systems customised to the specific operational needs and requirements of organisations. It is done through an in-house task force (2-5 key decision makers and specialist contributors) who are facilitated through a needs assessment and design process to produce the eventual system.

Upgrading Existing Systems Your present Performance Management System may just need to be assessed and adapted to optimise the results you wish to achieve.

Contact Us for a FREE ASSESSMENT of your present system, and a NO OBLIGATION QUOTATION in respect of upgrading it if necessary. Client Comments I would like to express my appreciation on behalf of the Regency Duty Free management team for all the work and effort you have put in to develop a Performance Management and Appraisal System for us. It is great to have a system that has been specifically designed for our company. Our managers have found the KPIs and sales tracking system easy to use and sales staff have commented that the monthly "on-track" coaching meetings enable them to get regular feedback on their performance and progress, which is very positive. Our goal to create a culture of performance within Regency has been greatly enhanced by your efforts!Lesley Beacham - HR Manager - Regency Duty Free Stores Ltd

The Performance Measurement/Management and Appraisal System you have designed for us is the best I have seen in all my years in retail.Lynette Richards - National Retail Manager - Just Kids Ltd

Page 115: PMS

Performance Management System TrainingIt is highly recommended that line management and general staff be trained in the correct "technical" application of their newly designed/upgraded Performance Management/Appraisal System (e.g. the organisation's Performance Management policy & procedures, formulating Objectives/KPI's & Performance Standards, Performance Appraisal documentation, etc. - i.e. the "HARD" part of the system). Half-day sessions are normally sufficient for this purpose.

Also, once a Performance Management System has been designed, it will not automatically provide line managers with the "SOFT" interaction skills to conduct the Performance Appraisals/Reviews effectively, or to address poor Performance or Behaviour throughout the year. Our following training programmes address these needs:

1. Constructive Performance Appraisals2. Performance Coaching and Counselling

Also consider Appraisal Smart our online Performance Appraisal System

Page 116: PMS
Page 117: PMS

The Performance Management System / CycleThe Performance Management Cycle / System fits very closely with the classic management cycle:

Performance AgreementThe performance agreement defines expectations, manager and employee work together to define what the employee should be doing for the upcoming period. When finished it should be clear to both manager and employee: What is expected in terms of knowledge, skills, behaviours and results. How these will be measured and communicated. What rewards will be forthcoming if agreed targets are achieved. How the role fits into the organisation as a whole. What level of authority the employee has in terms of carrying out the tasks. This should be done at the start of the year and will provide the basis for performance reviews.

Personal Development PlanningFollowing the Performance Agreement there may be certain areas identified that highlight a need for additional training and development in order to achieve what has been agreed. This would be included in a Personal Development Plan. Employees may also wish to discuss future aspirations and what development may be required at this stage to prepare for future roles. This provides a forum to discuss both vertical and lateral progression and enables the manager to know where employees ambitions lie and enable them to meet their needs to keep them challenged and motivated.

Page 118: PMS

PerformanceThere should be continuous dialogue, support and feedback taking place between the manager and the employee. This is continuous and ad hoc so be informal. Only if there have been severe lapses in performance will documentation be required. What is important is that employees are being helped and coached to achieve their best. If things are not going as well as hoped managers must be candid and deal with them immediately. The worst thing a manager can do is avoid dealing with poor performance at the time and save it till the performance review to bring it up!

Always be candid and transparent, it can sometimes be awkward and uncomfortable bringing up poor performance but everyone suffers, the individual, the team, the organisation, if it is not dealt with immediately.

Performance ReviewIf, as discussed above, there has been continuous dialogue and managers have dealt with poor performance as it occurred, the Performance Review should contain no surprises for the employee. If a manager surprises an employee with anything in a Performance Review the fault lies with the manager for not communicating effectively throughout the period.

The Performance Review should be approached in a positive way where manager and employee are in partnership working out what has gone well in the period and diagnosing and coming up with strategies for things that have gone not so well.

I have personally always found it helpful to have the employee actively involved in self evaluation, generally if they have performed poorly in an area they are aware of it and by them bringing it up they take more ownership of the problem.

Always start with positives and things that have gone well. When dealing with problems never blame but rather focus on learning and generating solutions. Once again the manager should be focusing on working together with the employee to help him/her achieve targets. . . together as a team.

Diagnosing problems and coming up with solutions forms part of the upcoming performance agreement and development plan in the next performance management cycle. There is section specifically for performance reviews for a more in depth coverage of the subject than dealt with here in the performance management system

Page 119: PMS

The Role of Performance Management in OrganizationsUpdated: 2008-08-21

Performance management is a quickly maturing business discipline. Like its better known siblings—sales and marketing, human resources, supply chain management, and accounting and finance—performance management has a key role to play in improving the overall value of an organization. Wayne Eckerson of The Data Warehouse Institute defines Performance Management as “a series of organizational processes and applications designed to optimize the execution of business strategy.” The focus of this book (and its complimentary volume, The Rational Guide to Monitoring and Analyzing with Microsoft Office PerformancePoint Server 2007) is on the application side of the definition, but it is important to understand how the organizational process works.

This article is an excerpt from The Rational Guide to Planning with Microsoft Office PerformancePoint Server 2007, by Adrian Downes and Nick Barclay, and is property of Mann Publishing Group (978-1-932577-42-6), copyright January 2008, all rights reserved. No part of this chapter may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, electrostatic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

The fitness program described earlier outlines a strategy for following certain recommended exercises and healthy habits, helping you to achieve your objectives (e.g., becoming stronger, lighter, etc.), and leading towards your goal of becoming more fit. Throughout the program, there may be certain targets to strive for, such as 20 more pushups a month, or completing that 20-minute treadmill run at a higher average rate of speed. Your trainer also uses the program to record your progress from visit to visit, providing feedback on your overall performance and determining whether you are on track towards meeting specific objectives.

Feedback is important to us, because it helps us to further understand why we may or may not be meeting specific targets. Feedback can also be used to modify our expectations, and to set new objectives over the course of the program. In business, a similar process takes place:

1. Planning what we would like to happen, based on insights from analysis of trends in our industry and events that impact our business.

2. Executing, by making decisions and taking action, based on the outcomes of planning activities.

3. Monitoring our progress towards a certain time-limited target or objective.

4. Analyzing further to understand why we may or may not be on-track to meet a specific target or objective.

5. Forecast what we think will happen, based on what we have analyzed. Here we build one or more scenarios to help us predict certain outcomes. These outcomes help us to confirm or refute our choice of tactics to meet our objectives.

Figure 1.1 illustrates this process.

Figure 1.1: The Performance Management Cycle.

Page 120: PMS

Similar to our fitness program, where progress is monitored and analyzed in areas such as weight loss or number of repetitions for a given exercise, performance management involves monitoring key performance indicators (KPIs) that measure whether an organization is meeting its objectives and overarching strategy. A KPI in this sense is a measure defined by a business that allows for observation of actual values, as they may emerge from line-of-business (LOB) applications and their comparison to established targets (or budgeted values). If a KPI reveals an actual value that deviates too far from (or in many cases, closely approaches) a pre-defined target, then further analysis is warranted. Discoveries made during analysis should help us plan our next steps, set new (or adjust existing) expectations, and predict what may happen based on our decisions. In larger organizations, data from multiple LOB systems are often centralized within “a single version of the truth” business intelligence (BI) system to optimize KPI monitoring, detailed analysis, and performance reporting. BI systems often (but not always) consist of several layers that work together, helping businesses to:

Integrate and refine data from a variety of applications, systems, and documents into a centralized data mart or data warehouse.

Analyze refined data to gain insight into current performance (monitoring KPIs), potential causes for specific KPI variances (or deviations of actual values from target values).

Report past, current, or forecast conditions to stakeholders.

The goal of a BI system is to ultimately help business people make better, faster decisions. Classically, such decision-making has occurred at higher levels of an organization and been limited to a relatively small number of individuals. However, corporate culture has changed significantly over the last decade, and themes of transparency, accountability, and empowerment have emerged. Performance management frameworks, like Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard method, build on these notions by making all steps in the cycle (illustrated in Figure 1.1) occur at executive, departmental, and operational layers of the modern organization.

Page 121: PMS

Performance Management Cycle

 

Performing reviews is something that is one of the most common forms and parts

of being apart of the workforce. Throughout completing these reports, is making

sure that the employees are well aware of what positives they are adding to the

job with their work and their work ethic, and what areas as a whole they need to

work. The moment that the review is concluded, it's time to begin working and

preparing for the next years reviews by repeating the process of observing. This

process of yearly reviews in this manner is called performance management

cycle.

The reason for this process to be considered a cycle because it continues and

revolves around in a manner that involves a repetitive system that happens

yearly, and in some professional establishments, it happens quarterly. The

reviewing process is one that takes place on a continuing process is which is

used in order evaluate the employees of a company in order to make sure that

they are making the necessary improvements, which is a helping factor to help

show if a person cares about their jobs.

Evaluations is

one of the main ways in which an employer is able to decide whether or not their

employee is able to work along the guidelines of the company's standards that

have been set. Should these standards not be met, it will be viewed through

Page 122: PMS

doing an evaluation where the company's standards will play as the guidelines in

which will be used to judge an employee. In most evaluations, it's common for

employees to not always get a 100% on their reviews, this is frowned upon in

most business and company establishments. From a psychological standpoint

given by many psychologists, by having no criticism of an employee could leave

them feeling stagnant and at a standstill, as though you also don't notice them. It

also has a way of showing that employers aren't holding their employees up to

the company's standards. The routinely aspect of doing evaluations is what is

better known as performance management cycle.

The performance management cycle is responsible for a series of five steps that

goes into performing an evaluation of an employee. The five steps are planning,

execution, assessment, review, and renewal. With the consideration of these five

steps, there are a certain amount of points that are assigned to each category.

With the total points that are added up, the employee receives a certain score.

This score is based upon how each employee does within each of the categories,

based upon positives and negatives that happen to come across the scoring

process. Once this score is totalled, it will then be compared to the scores from

the last evaluation. Any improvement in scores generally results in a raise of

sorts, or sometimes a bonus. In some cases, there are those who have received

a considerable raise and a promotion due to their high scores and improvement.

In the Planning section of the performance management cycle, the employer

gathers all materials that are needed for the evaluation. That includes the

evaluation form for the current reviews, and those that from the past reviews.

From there, the employer is responsible for discussing any questions that they

have about the assessment process, scoring, or anything else that play an

important or non-important role in the matter. Next, a review of the standards of

the company are reviewed, which is always good for both employer and

employee.

In the Execution process of the performance management cycle is the moment in

which the review actually begins. This is the time in which the employer will begin

to discuss and review everything from the last evaluation. From this, the

employer will begin to discuss and go through exactly what will happen during

Page 123: PMS

the evaluation, and discuss what they have noticed on the positive scale of the

employees performance. The employer will pull all of what they have observed

from their past experiences since the last review of the employee and begin

discussing what they've noticed, and how that is a positive impact for both the

company and themselves as a person. While talking about their performance,

and what they have positively seen, they also discuss how that plays a major part

within the company.

The Assessment of the performance management cycle is the portion of

evaluation where both the employer and employee have the opportunity to

discuss the performance on an overall level. This is where any questions and/or

concerns can be brought to light. On both levels, the employee has the

opportunity to discuss how they feel about the company, any problems that they

have had, or anything that they feel would improve their working ethic, or even

improve the company as a whole. Through this discussion, the employer will

have the chance to entertain such notions, and even begin the process of

implementing any plans or solutions that can be put to work in the effort of

helping the employee to further themselves within the company, especially if they

have an interest in gaining a promotion.

The Review portion of the performance management cycle involves the

processing of the entire evaluation, and then there is a discussion of the why the

particular points were given. This is also the time in which the employer will

Page 124: PMS

discuss any problem areas in which they have noticed within the employee. This

could include timeliness to work, dress code problems, completing work, how

they get along with other employees, their work ethic, how they handle their job,

etc. All of these factors, though may seem small to a degree, all play a role in

being scored, and each point can mean the different between getting a

promotion, a raise, and/or a bonus, and in some cases, people getting fired.

The Renewal of the performance management cycle is a simple process in which

the employer has the employee sign a sheet of paper that states that they have

discussed the employees review one on one, and that they are aware of their

assessed score and understand why they have received the score that they have

gotten.

Many business work with a performance management cycle in order to help them

understand and keep a watchful eye on their employees. Through these efforts,

they are able to conduct a business and company that upholds the standards

and levels in which the foundation is made of.

Page 125: PMS

Performance Reporting Under Outcomes & OutputsThis advice on performance reporting under the outcomes and outputs framework has been updated following the publication of 2001-2002 departmental and agency annual reports. It includes some good practice examples.

1. Policy & purpose

The Government has promulgated a set of Performance Management Principles that identify the main features of good practice in performance reporting and management for purposes internal and external to its agencies. There is a requirement that performance reporting within portfolios be reviewed against these principles at least every three years. Various aspects of the Performance Management Principles are discussed further below.

All Australian Government agencies are required to publish performance information in key accountability documents such as Portfolio Budget Statements and annual reports. Performance information should be published for the following major components of the outcomes and outputs framework:

Outcomes: these require indicators of effectiveness, in terms of the contribution of the relevant departmental outputs and administered items to the achievement of the outcome;

Outputs: require indicators of efficiency - the price, quantity and quality of the final output. Administered items: require indicators relating to the achievement of the objectives of the

administered item, be it grants, transfers or benefit payments (for example). The requisite performance information for administered items is often indicated in the associated legislation, policy statements or inter-governmental agreement controlling the item. Most Government programmes are administered items.

The following discussion outlines the purpose of performance information under the outcomes and outputs framework, linking it to other common performance management approaches such as business planning and the balanced scorecard approach.

1.1 Purpose of performance information

Performance information is evidence about performance that is collected and used systematically. It can be collected at many levels depending on the purpose and the structure of each agency.

The internal uses of such information include providing timely feedback on the performance of outputs and administered items so that action can be taken during the budget year to ensure that the expectations of the government and agency can be met. Measures aligned with personal performance agreements can also be used to provide feedback to staff on their contribution to the management of outputs and administered items. Generally, an alignment between an agency´s organisational structure and it´s outcomes and outputs structure is recommended. Experience has shown there are definite advantages in aligning an agency's administrative or financial control structure with its outputs or outcome streams, but there will be a few agencies where this is not practical or cost effective.

Externally, the purpose of performance information is to assist stakeholders and management to draw well-informed conclusions about performance from what is provided in the published

Page 126: PMS

documentation, and provide a sound contribution towards decision-making. In this context, a top-level strategic overview is essential. External reporting is generally less frequent and less detailed than that for internal purposes. Before a budget year commences, it external reporting focuses on foreshadowing the desired or expected performance for that year in the agency´s Portfolio Budget Statements. When the same budget year is over, the reporting of actual performance for that year occurs through annual reports. Candour in disclosure, and action on performance information (for example, redesigning  a process or output where necessary) will add to an agency´s credibility.

This process should be carried out in a transparent way, so that those to whom agencies and governments are accountable can make informed judgements. As stated above, agencies are required to identify their planned performance in their budget documentation (Portfolio Budget Statements and Additional Estimates Statements) and to report on their actual performance in their annual reports.

Guidance on these accountability documents is available on the web sites of the Department of Finance and Administration (in relation to PBS and PAES requirements for all agencies and for annual reporting for Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act bodies) and Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (in relation to requirements for departmental annual reports).

2. Design issues

This section addresses the design issues in developing performance information under the outcomes and outputs framework.

2.1 Performance information & behaviours

Poorly designed or specified performance indicators can result in unintended consequences if the behaviours they encourage are not carefully considered. There is a risk that managers may feel obliged to generate output that is tailored to an artificial or inappropriate target (for example, a specific number of ministerial briefs) or change the nature of their work to make the numbers 'right' (for example, breaking up or amalgamating supplier contracts). It is therefore important to keep this possibility in mind when designing performance indicators. It is also important to stress the inter-relationship of the indicators: meeting a quantity target at the expense of price or quality expectations is not appropriate or desirable.

2.2 Balance & clarity

Performance information will be useful where it is pitched to provide a comprehensive and balanced coverage of a particular outcome, output or administered item. This can be achieved with a concise basket of performance indicators which can be understood, are well-defined, and are cost-effective to collect, store and manage.

2.3 Targets

Performance information should provide perspective. It is most effective where current output performance can be compared qualitatively or quantitatively against specific benchmarks, targets or activity levels where this is appropriate. In a context of continuous improvement, it is desirable that these be of a stretching nature (i.e. demanding significant but achievable improvement) where possible. The extent of "stretch" should be identified explicitly. Activity levels should be realistic.

2.4 Outcomes

Page 127: PMS

Outcome performance information relates to the specific impact that an agency's outputs and administered items have had on the community. Outcomes are often long-term or on-going in nature, and performance information in this area must focus on effectiveness of contribution to achieving the outcome. Outcomes information needs to achieve a balance between addressing progress against milestones or intermediate outcomes and ultimate long-term impacts. It must also measure the unintended impacts of agency outputs or administered items, where relevant. According to the circumstances, outcome reporting can often be complemented by identifying the results of performance audits, reviews or programme or output evaluations. Ultimately, ehat the community, Parliamentarians and the Government are most interested in is results - in the achievement of outcomes. Outcomes constitutionally provide the purpose and level at which funds are appropriated. This is also the level at which the community views the activities of the government.

2.5 Outputs

In addition to reporting on effectiveness in achieving outcomes, output performance information relates to an agency´s efficiency in executing its responsibilities. Output efficiency indicators measure the quality, quantity and price of agency products and services. The aim is to demonstrate through a concise basket of indicators that an agency has addressed the government's purchase requirements in a way that demonstrates overall value for money and value for the community. For internal performance management, it is useful to identify the impact of strategies which have been adopted during the year to achieve or improve performance, and to recognise continuous improvement.

2.6 Administered items

In addition to reporting on the effectiveness of any administered items in achieving outcomes, performance information for administered items will also address - where relevant - the quality, quantity and cost associated with delivery of the item. In some cases this will include information extracted from other jurisdictions (in the case of State or Territory outputs funded by the Australian Government) and in some cases outputs delivered by non-government organisations (eg. Job Network). It will also address transfer payments which meet the Government's requirements. These are most often specified in legislation, inter-governmental agreements, other contractual arrangements, or other expressions of Government policy.

2.7 Stability versus improvement

Agency outcomes, outputs and performance information structures can be expected to evolve with experience to meet contemporary needs and changing policy objectives or priorities. Performance information for any purpose is most effective where trends can be compared over time. However, this needs to be carefully balanced against changes in needs, and the availability of more relevant or more reliable information. Performance information should be regularly assessed for appropriateness through systematic review and evaluation of departmental outputs and administered items and, where necessary, review and evaluation of the Government outcomes they support.

2.8 The performance management cycle

The outcomes and outputs framework provides the basis for agencies to develop robust performance management systems that allow them to continuously improve the way they do business. This gives rise to a cycle of improvement, depicted in the diagram below. The performance management cycle has six stages:

Page 128: PMS

identify the crucial areas of performance; establish benchmarks for achieving the specified outcomes as effectively and efficiently

as possible; develop information systems to generate the appropriate data; report on results and interpret the information to identify areas for improvement; make appropriate changes to management and operations; and revise the relevant benchmarks accordingly (taking into account the need for continuity of

indicators over time).

Performance Management Cycle

 

The performance management cycle interconnects with the wider framework of the Performance Improvement Cycle (PIC), promulgated by the Department of Finance and Administration in March 1998. The PIC is a case-by-case approach to management review and improvement. It aims to encourage managers to actively question the relevance of particular activities and the need to continue with a given set of responsibilities or modes of operating. The PIC has four stages:

Phase One: Review Government Activity;

: Should the Australian Government be involved in the activity?

: Should the activity be devolved to another level of government, privatised or discontinued?

Phase Two: Testing Cost and Effectiveness;

: What is the most efficient way for the Australian Government to be involved in the activity - competitive tendering and contracting, benchmarking, partnering re-engineering, contracting with another agency etc?

Phase Three: Implement Improvements;

: How will improvements be implemented most efficiently?

Page 129: PMS

Phase Four: Review and Evaluation;

: How well did the improvement strategy work and is it still relevant to the current environment? (Repeat phases one and two)

2.9 Performance information under outcomes & outputs, business planning and the balanced scorecard

For those agencies that utilise such management tools, the outcomes and outputs framework 'maps' across two other common corporate management tools - corporate planning and balanced scorecard - in the fashion outlined below. Each approach is concerned with aligning strategy and operations so that they are consistent with the overall purpose of the organisation. The outcomes and outputs approach has a strong focus on performance measurement, especially in terms of the effectiveness of outcomes. Corporate planning helps organisations identify their key result areas and ensure that their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats are clearly identified and dealt with in the organisation's strategies. The balanced scorecard provides a matrix to check the consistency of performance information from all levels in the organisation within the four (or sometimes five) perspectives of customers, internal processes, innovation and financial performance.

Mapping outcomes & outputs to planning and balanced scorecard systems

 

3. Outcome information

Outcome performance indicators focus on the effectiveness of government activity in contributing to specified outcomes. There are two types:

those that relate to the effectiveness of government's contribution to the result, principally through its administered items and its agencies' outputs; and

those that relate to the overall state of the outcome.

In general, since there are limits to the effect government action has on the community, indicators of effectiveness will form a subset of indicators of the overall state of the outcome.

Page 130: PMS

3.1 Information on overall outcome result

Most outcome statements will implicitly include some suggestion of the indicators of their overall achievement. It is desirable to specify at least one or two such indicators for each outcome as a means of reporting on the general trends in the area targeted by the outcome.

This information is useful in describing the broad environment in which the agency is operating and in developing and communicating policy options. Such indicators, however, should not purport to necessarily represent the agency's contribution to the outcome. That information should be contained in the effectiveness indicators discussed below.

3.2 Information on effectiveness

'Effectiveness' refers to the extent to which outputs and/or administered items make positive contributions to the specified outcome. Effectiveness, then, is a function of outputs and administered items being both appropriate and well performing. While it is possible to have an inefficient output or administered item that is highly effective in terms of impacting upon the desired outcome, in practice it is rare for an output that is of, for example, a high per unit cost and low quality to also be effective in realising the desired outcome.

Effectiveness indicators will generally be derived from some characteristic of the outcome and they should be designed to identify as clearly as possible the causal relationship between the outputs and/or administered items and the outcome. These indicators require very careful design and specification. They cannot be as easily characterised as output or administered item indicators and there are few 'generic' indicators of the effectiveness of  outputs and administered items. For long-term planning and policy purposes, however, it is important that the best available effectiveness indicators are identified and reported against. It is therefore up to agencies - in close consultation with their ministers and stakeholders - to identify realistic, useful and relevant effectiveness indicators to help those interested in the agency and/or the administered items the agency manages to better understand their value in terms of specific policy outcomes.

Effectiveness indicators will generally be judged by four criteria:

(i) the degree to which they reflect the terms of the specified outcome;

(ii) the degree to which they relate to the appropriateness of the specified outputs or administered items in contributing to the specified outcome;

(iii) the degree to which they encompass contributions to the outcome by all relevant outputs and/or administered items; and

(iv) the degree to which they account for factors outside the direct or indirect influence or control of the agency and/or government policy mechanisms (i.e., in relation to administered items).

None of these criteria is an absolute. There are few (if any) effectiveness indicators which will always entirely reveal the appropriateness of the output or administered item as well as measure all its contributions - and only its contributions - to the outcome. The intention, however, is to come as close as possible to this ideal.

3.3 Effectiveness information & outcome and output structures

Page 131: PMS

The process of designing indicators of effectiveness can be a useful tool for checking the appropriateness of the overall framework supporting a given outcome and the outputs and administered items designed to achieve it. If, for example, an output is not well specified, it may well prove difficult to identify robust and reliable indicators of its contribution to the outcome. Similarly, if the outcome itself is too general or couched in inappropriate language, then it may not be possible to establish effectiveness criteria that demonstrate the link between an output or administered item (even if the contributing aspects are well specified in their own terms) and the outcome.

The design process for outcomes, outputs and effectiveness indicators and efficiency indicators (and inputs, activities and processes, for that matter) should therefore be iterative, with opportunities to cross-check the fit and alignment of each element of the structure with the others. This learning is iterative and adjustments to inputs, processes or even outputs often occurs over time. This maximises the opportunity for an optimal system to be established.

Within the limits imposed by available resources and time, as well as various extraneous factors, agencies are responsible for establishing an outcome and output structure (including relevant performance indicators) that is as close to optimal as possible. Once a structure has been established, however, there is a need to counterbalance the potential gains in refining it with the risk of diminishing year-on-year comparisons of performance and results.

3.4 Attach effectiveness indicators to outcomes

Effectiveness indicators should reflect the terms of the outcome as much as possible.  This allows for the combined effects of the outputs and administered items to be measured and reported.

In practice, some effectiveness indicators will arise from a specific output or administered item. This may occur where there is a clear one-to-one causal relationship between the outcome and the output or where the optimal means of identifying the achievement of the outcome is through reporting on the separate effects of the various outputs and/or administered items.

Under a slightly different scenario, while one output or administered item may make an appropriately effective contribution to one aspect of an outcome, it may conceivably detract from the realisation of another aspect of the same outcome. This can happen, for example, where the outcome is aimed at striking a balance between competing objectives (for example, economic growth and environmental sustainability). In these cases it is also best to report on effectiveness at the outcome level to account for the differing influences of the relevant outputs and/or administered items.

3.5 Coverage of outcome indicators & accounting for extraneous factors

Most government agencies operate in environments that are complex systems of interconnected factors. Some of these the agency can influence, some it cannot. Even within an agency's scope of operations, there can be competing goals or objectives. As a consequence, many outputs and administered items are necessarily constrained by:

the intrinsic limitations of the agency in terms of its regulatory or policy scope and its resourcing; and/or

the need to balance different objectives.

Under these circumstances, it is important that the effectiveness indicators in combination reflect these different interests. As far as possible, they should also take account of factors that are beyond the direct or indirect control or influence of the agency, whether these are factors arising

Page 132: PMS

from the work of different levels of government, other agencies within the Australian Government or the wider national or global economy. Where it is not possible to 'quarantine' the indicators in this way, the narrative surrounding them should make clear that the agency is aware of the imperfect match between the indicators and the relationship between the outputs and the outcome. A frank, well-based assessment of the agency´s contribution is likely to be respected by readers of annual reports.

The public reporting of effectiveness indicators ought to give Parliament and stakeholders a good indication of how well specific outputs or administered items are, or are not, contributing towards the achievement of an outcome. They should also give a general indication of the overall state of the outcome itself. In this way, both the appropriateness of government outputs or programmes are measured against what they were designed to achieve, and the general state of the outcome area in the community is also monitored.

In some cases, intermediate outcomes (ie. performance information intermediate to the achievement of the desired outcome) may be utilised to offer trend or percentage data or other reliable proxies to illustrate the impact agencies are achieving. For example, the achievement of a particular target or milestone that relates strongly to the government's policy objectives, as specified in the outcome statement, would help indicate the effectiveness of government action.

Some agencies may also wish to highlight in their outcome reporting any significant impacts on the outcome (positive or negative) that are due to major external factors, where relevant - especially where it impacts upon the effectiveness of the agency.

3.6 How many outcome indicators?

As a general rule, the effectiveness indicators should cover the disparate aspects specified in the outcome. For example, if the outcome identifies efficient as well as fair results for the target group, then it would be desirable to specify at least one indicator for each of these qualities. Some outcomes, however, operate at such a high level and imply such a wide range of actual or potential interests to be addressed (for example, the Treasury portfolio has responsibilities that cover the entire national economy), that it may be necessary to concentrate effectiveness information on those aspects that are most pertinent from an accountability and policy point of view. In general, less than two effectiveness indicators for an outcome is unlikely to provide interested parties with enough data to make judgements about the contributions of the departmental outputs and/or the administered items. More than six, however, may confuse the issue by including data that is of diminished relevance to the outcome and/or the outputs and administered items.

3.7 Independent data collection

Wherever possible, data for effectiveness indicators should come from public or at least independent sources. It may be necessary from time to time to commission specific research or analysis of statistical or other data to generate the required measures. It is important for probity and public confidence reasons that the agency not be solely responsible for gathering, maintaining and interpreting the data used in assessing the effectiveness of its own outputs.

4. Output information

Output indicators provide information on the productivity and therefore efficiency of a given output in terms of the combined and interdependent effects of its price, quantity and quality. Each of these three characteristics has an impact on the other, and the mix between them will often be

Page 133: PMS

determined by the balance between the government´s requirements for a certain standard of service or quality of product, and the amount it is willing to fund an agency to produce this.

Output Performance: A Balance Between Quality, Quantity & Price

The following sections discuss price, quantity and quality separately, but their mutual dependence should always be borne in mind when designing, measuring and especially interpreting performance information. An output can only be determined to be efficient when the combined impact of all three characteristics are taken into account. Lastly, agencies should keep in mind that an efficient output is not always an effective output. Indeed, it is possible for an output to perform to a very high level-including in terms of its quality aspects - while its impact on the outcome is negligible or even detrimental. This circumstance will most often arise when the output is not an appropriate or optimal response to the demands of the specified outcome.

4.1 Quality

Quality indicators relate to the specific, immediate characteristics of an output that are not encompassed by price or quantity. Measuring the `quality´ characteristic of an output is not concerned with the degree and nature of the output's contribution to the specified outcome. Be careful not to confuse measures of an output's quality characteristics with measures of its effectiveness on the desired outcome.

The qualitative aspects of an output can be elusive to define, measure and interpret. Quality indicators can relate to tangible, objective criteria (e.g., timeliness, coverage, accuracy, conformity to specifications) and less tangible, interpretive data (such as client satisfaction, peer review or public perception/profile). These aspects will often also have the greatest relevance to those immediately affected by the output and, to a lesser extent, to accountability bodies such as parliamentary committees. It is therefore important that quality indicators:

measure those aspects of the output that are most pertinent to clients, customers or stakeholders;

include both tangible, objective indicators as well as subjective, qualitative information; and

are kept to a minimum number, as it is possible to overload both the user of the information and the agency's capacity to gather and interpret relevant data.

Page 134: PMS

Generally speaking, then, an output would need to have at least two and perhaps up to four or five indicators of quality. Less than two would probably not encompass both the objective and subjective information required, while more than around five would usually either confuse the issue or generate costs in data collection and interpretation that would outweigh the benefits.

4.2 Quantity

In many circumstances, the measurement of quantity is a straightforward matter. This is especially so where the activity in question is a reasonably homogeneous administrative or service function. Examples might include the processing of veterans' benefit claims (where the unit of measurement is the number of claims) or the administration of a grants scheme (where the unit of measurement is the number of grant applications).

Public sector organisations, however, often generate outputs that are not so homogeneous. Policy development and advice is perhaps the most ubiquitous example, but there are others, including: research and development; capabilities or reserves of various types (for example, defence); foreign relations and diplomacy; and regulation. These cases are often analogous to private sector arrangements whereby a client might be paying for a capacity (for example, fast-turnaround legal advice to a specific standard of expertise) rather than one off (for example, drafting a contract) or serial activities where demand is known in advance (for example, processing monthly accounts).

Where there is a relative lack of homogeneity, it is important to select a quantity indicator that will make the most sense when read in conjunction with the price and quality indicators. To build on the example of policy development and advice, a minister may not see the number of policy briefs prepared as being an appropriate metric against which to cast information about the quality or price of an agency's policy advice outputs. This is particularly so if the number of briefs is used as a performance target. More important, and more relevant to the attendant quality and price indicators, would be information about the capacity of the agency's policy areas. This might be measured in terms of officer hours applied to policy work, for example.

4.3 Price

Price refers to the market value of a good or product. This characteristic is largely influenced by the cost of production, distribution and supply (i.e. the inputs), but it can also be determined by demand and the extent to which there is an alternative supply, and what government is willing to pay. Price is therefore the point of balance between the cost of production, the price of alternatives, the quality and quantity to be produced of the chosen output, and the amount the government is willing to pay.

Where an agency seeks a change in funding it needs to comply with the Budget process operational rules as promulgated annually. Further information on costing, pricing and accounting practices can be found at Finance's web based service Accounting and Budgeting Information.

4.4 Demand is not the same as performance

There is a tendency for some agencies to designate as 'performance indicators' factors that are actually measures of demand (for example, number of client phone calls received or number of ministerial briefs called for) rather than performance. This is most common in the area of quantity indicators (for example, client queries, number of ministerial briefings). The relationship between these factors and agency performance can sometimes be marginal at best. While demand data is often of considerable interest in itself, it is not necessarily an indication of agency performance, especially when read in conjunction with quality indicators. Having a 100% client satisfaction

Page 135: PMS

rating, for example, is of diminished relevance if that rating is only among the 50% of clients whose phone calls are actually answered.

4.5 Cross-output indicators

Some agencies find that some indicators derive from factors that cut across outputs. This happens particularly where the outputs are oriented towards the same outcome. On occasion this may be the result of poor specification of the output, or poor design of the data collection arrangements. Sometimes, however, it may be unavoidable. Customer satisfaction measures, for example, often reflect customers' perceptions of the performance of the agency as a whole, rather than individual programmes or outputs. Under these circumstances, it is reasonable to retain such indicators but to identify their cross-output character in the explanation of the indicators or results. Where possible, some apportionment of the respective contributions of the outputs to the performance indicator result should be provided, even if in general terms (for example, by noting that a percentage of responses were from customers who had made no use of a particular output, while another percentage might have used only that particular output).

4.6 Extraneous factors and output delivery

Agencies are generally recommended to report on just the quantity, quality and price of their outputs. There may at times be extraneous factors that affect delivery of an output through one of the three key class of indicators (quantity, quality or price), thereby affecting that agency´s record of efficient performance. It is often not possible, or not even necessary, to account for all extraneous factors that may contribute to or detract from an efficient output. If an outside effect is particularly pertinent to an outputs performance, an agency may want to explain and quantify that impact. Agencies should not report on a factor of marginal relevance to the output.

External factors are generally considered more important where they effect achievement of an outcome, rather than production of individual outputs.

4.7 How many output indicators?

Efficiency is usually best measured by a concise basket of inter-related performance indicators. It can be just as misleading to have too many efficiency indicators as too few, especially if the selected indicators are of marginal relevance, validity or utility. In general, efficiency indicators used for external reporting purposes should be a subset of those generated for internal management purposes. One indicator each for quantity and price should normally be sufficient, while quality measures often require at least two indicators (covering subjective information such as client satisfaction and more objective information such as performance to specifications). More than four quality indicators for an output may confuse or frustrate the reader while adding little to their level of understanding of the output.

4.8 Management information systems for output indicators

Generating information for performance measurement is not cost-free. It is therefore important to consider management information factors when designing indicators. Where possible, the information used should emerge as a natural byproduct of the agency's normal functions and information needs. Many agencies, however, have found that robust and reliable data for output management calls for enhancement of their information and accounting systems, especially in using such tools as activity based costing (ABC) and benchmarking. Much of the information used in output performance indicators must be aggregated up from the level of activities and processes, and allocating overhead and shared resource costs may demand sophisticated mapping of activities and processes. [example]

Page 136: PMS

4.9 Allocation of overheads and shared resources

Overheads and other shared resources are allocated across departmental outputs. The criteria by which this distribution takes place vary from case to case. It is important, however, that where such costs are distributed other than on the basis of direct cost drivers (for example, rates of actual computer usage), the criteria used should relate as closely to 'true' cost drivers as possible (for example, staff numbers for personnel functions, number of telephone, fax and data connections for telecommunications).

5. Administered items information

Performance information for administered items generally arise from the specific circumstances and characteristics of the items themselves. It is often implicit in the relevant legislation or policy documentation what the key performance characteristics should be. A further source of such information would be the terms and conditions attached to grants and the performance criteria stipulated in inter-governmental agreements relating to transfers to the state and territory governments.

Where possible and appropriate, indicators of quantity, quality and cost should be identified. The test of appropriateness should be whether the proposed performance information regime will serve to enhance management decision-making, policy development and public accountability.

6. Examples of good practice

Agencies have taken various approaches to performance reporting under the flexibility allowed by the outcomes and outputs framework.  This is consistent with the devolution of responsibility to agency heads and the different responsibilities and needs of agencies.

The agency annual reports for 1999-00 were the first to be published under this framework.  These reported against the outcomes, outputs and performance indicators that were identified in the 1999-00 Portfolio Budget Statements.  There have been two further complete cycles, with the following discussion centered on the 2001-02 annual reports. The following are presented as examples of good practice.  As in most matters concerning performance reporting, they will include features capable of further improvement.

(a) outcomes reporting

The Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) identifies in its 2001-02 Portfolio Budget Statements (PBS) a range of measures, including forecasts, for each outcome (eg Outcome 1 pp.37-44). These are often independently collected measures, adding to the credibility of the reporting. They are discussed within the annual report, providing trend data where available (eg. Outcome 1 pp.24-29).

The Department of Family and Community Services (FaCS) identifies a comprehensive suite of effectiveness indicators. The strength of the FaCS reporting lies in its analysis/explanation of each indicator's results in the annual report. For example,  effectiveness indicators for Outcome 1 (Stronger families) are identified in the 2001-02 PBS (pp.63-80) and the general approach of these is explained at pages 38-39. The indicators are discussed in the 2001-02 annual report (pp.24-32 in volume 2). There are also a set of environmental indicators providing a broader focus.

(b) outputs reporting

Page 137: PMS

FaCS reporting at output level is also comprehensive, with those for outputs under Outcome 1 identified at pages 63-80 in the 2001-02 PBS under the quality, quantity and price labels; most with targets identified. Activity levels and achievements against quantity and quality/timeliness targets are well presented in the annual report (pp.24-86 of volume 2) for Outcome 1, although this is interspersed with the effectiveness information mentioned above.

The Australian Trade Commission reported consistently in its 2001-02 annual report against output indicators and targets identified in the 2001-02 PBS. For example, the output measures and targets for Outcome 2 are identified in the PBS (p.77) and the end-year results for all outcomes and outputs are summarised at page 9 of the annual report with full output details at Appendix A (pp.114-115).

(c) administered items reporting

DEST's output groups are structured against the department´s administered items, reflecting the fact that these represent over 98% of the department's appropriation.  DEST's administered item measures in the 2001-02 PBS are often accompanied by targets (eg Outcome Group 2.1 pp.65-65).  Reporting in the 2001-02 annual report discusses these measures in sequence showing original targets and results (eg Output Group 2.1 pp.179-180).

(d) strong linkages between 2001-02 Portfolio Budget Statements and annual reports

One feature of the outcomes and outputs framework is that appropriations are now aligned with reporting, through common outcome statements for the Appropriation Bills, Budget and Budget-Related Papers, and annual reports. This did not occur previously. Another feature of the framework is that a `clear read´ is now possible between planned performance in Portfolio Budget Statements and actual performance for the same year as recorded in the corresponding annual reports. The reporting of most Commonwealth agencies has achieved improved focus through this approach. Two examples are provided below.

The Department of Finance and Administration identifies performance indicators and targets in its PBS for outcomes and outputs.  It identifies the same indicators in its annual report, together with the performance result.  It quantifies results against indicators, and often specifically notes where effectiveness and quality indicators have been achieved, surpassed or not met. Quantity indicators show forecast and actual values in the annual report, enabling the reader to make an easy comparison.  For example, see Outcome One in the 2001-02 PBS (pp.38-39) and the 2001-02 Annual Report (pp.23-27).

The Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs identifies performance indicators and targets in its Portfolio Budget Statements (PBS) for outputs but not targets for outcomes. It reproduces the same information in its annual report, adding a result column. For instance, see outcome related information under Outcome One in the 2001-02 PBS (pp.37-38) and the 2001-02 Annual Report (pp. 63-65). Output and administered item information has the benefit of target information with most PBS indicators (pp.38-45), against which performance is reported in the annual report (pp.66-77).

Purpose | How to use this program | The university's expectations regarding performance

Page 138: PMS

management | Definition | Objectives | Principles of developing a performance management plan | Supervisor's responsibility | Available resources

Purpose The purpose of this program is to provide supervisors with a resource to help them implement a performance management plan. While the University does not dictate a specific plan, all supervisors are expected to do some form of performance management consistent with the following guidelines.

Note: Supervisors on campuses with an established performance management program should follow and use campus-specific procedures and forms. Consult the campus Human Resources office for details and clarification.

How to use this program This program is divided into three sections: Introduction, Cycle, and Summary. If you are not familiar with the concept and principles of performance management, first familiarize yourself with all of the content in this Introduction. Then, go through the steps of the Cycle in sequence (starting with "Determine Major Job Duties") and conclude with the Summary. If you are familiar with Performance Management, feel free to go directly to a section to obtain specific information based on your needs. At any time you can look for a term using the search function. Also check out the information under the "Forms" section.

The university's expectations regarding performance management One of the most important functions of managers and supervisors is to effectively manage resources, and one of the most important resources they have is the staff they supervise. Managing them (and consequently their performance) begins with designing the jobs – determining what duties are important to include in a job, what the qualifications are to fulfill those duties and what level of performance is needed to meet the mission of the department. Performance management continues with the filling of the job with the best candidate, the training of the new hire and the continuous coaching to clarify expectations.  

Management of performance is important to being a good supervisor and clarification of expectations and performance feedback is also important to those they supervise. Consequently, all supervisors are expected to participate in a performance management program with their staff. Certain employee groups have specific policies and guidelines for applying the principles of performance management; therefore, supervisors will want to consult the appropriate policy manual. Following are two examples: 

Performance Management policy for Professional and Non-union Service and Support Staff university wide

Performance Appraisal policy for Support Staff at Bloomington and Northwest

Page 139: PMS

Definition Performance management is an ongoing, continuous process of communicating and clarifying job responsibilities, priorities and performance expectations in order to ensure mutual understanding between supervisor and employee. It is a philosophy which values and encourages employee development through a style of management which provides frequent feedback and fosters teamwork. It emphasizes communication and focuses on adding value to the organization by promoting improved job performance and encouraging skill development. Performance Management involves clarifying the job duties, defining performance standards, and documenting, evaluating and discussing performance with each employee.

Objectives The objectives of Performance Management are to:

1. Increase two-way communication between supervisors and employees 2. Clarify mission, goals, responsibilities, priorities and expectations 3. Identify and resolve performance problems 4. Recognize quality performance 5. Provide a basis for administrative decisions such as promotions, succession and

strategic planning, and pay for performance.

Principles of developing a performance management plan Development of a performance management plan should be consistent with the following principles:

1. Performance management is considered a process, not an event. It follows good management practice in which continual coaching, feedback and communication are integral to success.

2. The Performance Management Plan is primarily a communication tool to ensure mutual understanding of work responsibilities, priorities and performance expectations.

3. Elements for discussion and evaluation should be job specific – not generalized personality traits. The major duties and responsibilities of the specific job should be defined and communicated as the first step in the process.  

Page 140: PMS

4. Performance standards for each major duty/ responsibility should be defined and communicated.   

5. Employee involvement is encouraged in identifying major duties and defining performance standards.

6. Professional development should be an important component of the plan. 7. The formal evaluation period should be long enough to allow for full performance

and to establish a history such that evaluations are fair and meaningful. One year is a common evaluation period. 

8. Documentation of performance will occur as often as needed to record the continuum of dialogue between supervisor and employee.  

9. If formal ratings are included, they should reflect the incumbent's actual performance in relation to the performance standard for that major duty. 

10. The supervisor should be evaluated on the successful administration of the plan and ongoing performance management responsibilities.

11. Training for supervisors and employees is encouraged and will be provided by University Human Resource Services.  

12. The Performance Management Plan should be consistent with federal and state laws which address non-discrimination.

Supervisor's responsibilities The supervisor's responsibilities are to:

1. Communicate and clarify major job duties, priorities and expectations. 2. Establish and communicate performance standards. 3. Monitor employees' performance through observation, discussion, etc. 4. Document good and unacceptable performance. 5. Provide continuous coaching and constructive feedback in a timely manner. 6. Hold performance discussions (at least annually). 7. Correct poor performance and reinforce good performance. 8. Help employees to develop skills and abilities for improved performance. 9. Provide necessary information, resources and opportunity to allow

accomplishment of key results.

Available resources Employee and Organizational Development, University Human Resource Services, is available to provide consultation with supervisors interested in developing a Performance Management Plan. Individual and/or group training on all aspects of Performance Management is provided upon request.

 

Page 141: PMS

Are you in control of this performance management cycle? Do you know which levers

can be pulled to manage performance in year?  Are you able to continuously improve

the quality of your forecasting and budgeting by the appropriate use of variance

analysis?

Do you have the necessary internal control system in place to ensure that no nasty

surprises come out of the woodwork? How good is your risk management and

corporate governance?

Good practice is to be confident that your financial statements are complete, accurate

and valid, that your assets are adequately safeguarded and that your operations are

as efficient and effective as possible.

Good practice performance management and internal control

Key BenefitsIdentification of levers that can be pulled to manage performance in year.

Page 142: PMS

Good practice internal control system to manage risks.Reliable management information.

CapabilitiesPrepared the year end financial statements to US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for a US golf company. A prerequisite was the ability to work in French.Implemented and managed effective internal management control systems for a biotech company.Restored the management accounting and reporting of a multinational company division to a professional standard thus enabling the reintroduction of sector cost control.

Performance Management

Talent management has never been easier with the availability of performance

management software. Talent2’s Learning Management System (LMS) is a

proven choice to simplify your performance management processes and track

your employees’ performance plans against your business objectives.

The advantages of the Talent2 LMS performance management software are

clear:

Effective record keeping delivers a transparent audit trail for employees and managers

Automation saves time with repetitive tasks and allows paperless management People are empowered, in turn productivity and satisfaction can improve Decision making is aided with relevant reports and statistics, from micro to macro

organisational views Ability to integrate with your learner development plan for seamless management Assists with customisation of employee training plans rather than a one solution

fits all approach Ease of use and ability to track results encourages repeat use and involvement

You can expect a lot more from the Talent2 performance management solution:

Audit your performance reviews Build your own performance review templates

Page 143: PMS

Map your organisational processes into the Talent2 LMS Automatically assign your employee performance reviews with their manager and

set the frequency of these reviews

Eliminate the performance management paper trail Build your own performance management templates or tailor them for specific

groups Automatically schedule all employees for periodic performance reviews Empower your employees and managers to initiate and schedule their own

appraisals Empower your employees to complete an online self assessment prior to review Allow managers to enter comments and assessments for view by the employee or

for their own record

Centralise talent management Centrally manage and report on organisation-wide performance reviews View detailed employee reports and performance management review comments Produce exception reports at a group or organisational level Generate completion reports and statistics Conduct statistical analysis of employee performance against organisational goals

Complete the cycle – development plan Create your learner development plan Set job-based and personal development targets Identify desired business outcomes and activities Enable an iterative creation and approval process between your employees and

their manager

Performance Management Cycle

Page 144: PMS

 

Customise your training plansTo complete your professional development plan and achieve a customised

curriculum, easily match courses that support your employee’s development plan

outcomes to the learner’s training plan.

The performance management solution has many applications for your business

and Talent2 the necessary expertise to deliver the outcomes you desire.

Page 145: PMS

Enterprise Performance Management (EPM), also known as Corporate Performance Management (CPM) and Business Performance Management (BPM), is a strategic approach to improving business performance.

“Methodologies, metrics, processes, and systems used to monitor and manage the business performance of an enterprise”

as defined by Gartner Inc. “EPM in short represents the strategic deployment of business intelligence solutions”.

The EPM integrated solutions concept was recently conceived to define the actionable solutions that arise when information resides in concentrated sources within an organization. For Bitam, EPM is a top down framework consisting of 3 individual solutions: Business Intelligence, Strategic Planning and Financial Planning. The sole purpose of these combined solutions is to align the tactics, strategy and execution of business plans. The solutions are created on a unique platform utilizing a multidimensional model that supports a diverse array of capabilities that power the information through metrics, analytics, dashboards, and scorecards.

Some of the most known and adopted methodologies on performance management include: six sigma, balanced scorecard, activity-based costing, total quality management, economic value-add, and integrated strategic measurement. However, methodologies on their own cannot deliver results. They fail within the organizations operational processes because of poor execution and the unalignment of action and metrics. Bitam offers a complete suite of software tools that deliver the benefits of implementing and measuring strategic plans correctly.

Page 146: PMS

Resource Documents

Sign up on MY PAGE to receive an email alert when new content is added to this section of the website.In any normal business cycle, everything starts with a plan.  The strategic plan

for an organization routinely outlines the activities and initiatives that will structure

the work of the organization for a specified period of time.  The Central East

LHIN has purposely modified its business planning cycle and started with

engaging the people and communities within the LHIN to identify priorities and

areas for attention.

Documents contained in this

section of the website reflect

the order of the Central East

LHIN Business Planning Cycle

including Community

Engagement, Planning,

Integration, Funding,

Accountability and Performance

Management and serve as a

resource to health service

providers and the larger

community.

Community Engagement Planning Integration  Funding   Accountability   Performance  

Strategic Commissioning and Performance Management Division

Page 147: PMS

We have a range of services which aim to maximise people's independence and enable them to have as much control over their own lives as possible. Using highly trained staff, our services are constantly looking at ways to work in partnership with other organisations in order to develop flexible, responsive services that better meet the needs of the people in the communities we serve.

Our services include: Strategic Commissioning Quality and Procurement Carers and Customer Engagement Intelligence, Improvement and Partnerships

Home CareKim Harlock

Head of Division

IPC framework for joint commissioning and purchasing of public care services.

Page 148: PMS

Step 8 — Connect the Strategic Plan to a Performance Management System

At this point, the strategic plan is nearing completion. However, it must be

connected to a performance management system if it is to create the

accountability necessary for success. The goal of this step is to embed the

strategic plan into the organization's performance management process. In this

way, the expected plan results can be tracked, measured, reported and

evaluated. Also, key accountabilities can be monitored so that tasks are

completed according to the quality and time requirements.

The strategic plan is cascaded down the organization by presenting the expected

contribution of each person at each level to the organization to the overall results.

Pushing the expectations down into the organization assigns responsibility to a

broad cross-section of people who then can see their connections to the

agency's outcomes.

If the organization does not have an effective performance management system,

it should develop one in connection with implementing the strategic plan. The

content and tools in this section will help your organization cascade

accountability down to the individual employee level so that all personnel

understand how to contribute to the success of the organization's strategic plan.

Page 149: PMS
Page 150: PMS

performance at work depend on seven factors: 1) Direction, 2) Personal Capacity, 3) Motivators, 4) Work Design, 5) Information, 6) Performance Feedback, and 7) Resources. This mindmap details the key components associated with these factors.

 

MUNICIPAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

ULUNDI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENT

1. BACKGROUND 3

     

2. PURPOSE OF A PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 3

Page 151: PMS

     

3. MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE OF THE ULUNDI MUNICIPALITY 4

     

4. COMPONENTS OF THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5

     

5. CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS OF A PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

6

     

5.1 Focus 6

5.2 Balance 6

5.3 Stretch 6

5.4 Mobilisation 6

5.5 Latitude 6

5.6 Contracting 7

5.7 Motivation 7

5.8 Measurement 7

5.9 Appraisal 7

5.10 Feedback 7

5.11 Remuneration 7

5.12 Caring 7

5.13 Visual 7

     

6. THE TEN STEP ACTION PLAN TO EFFECT THE ULUNDI PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

8

     

6.1 Assuming Responsibility 8

6.2 Project Team 8

Page 152: PMS

6.3 Participation 8

6.4 Developing the Ulundi Performance Management System 9

6.5 Contractual Commitment and Agreements 13

6.6 Publication of the Performance Management System 13

6.7 Adoption of the System 13

6.8 Monitoring Framework 13

6.9 Performance Evaluation 14

6.10 Reporting on Performance 16

     

7. ACTION, ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND TIMEFRAMES 17

     

8. A WORD ON RECOGNITION 19

     

8.1 Renumeration Policy Guideline 19

     

9. CONCLUSION 20

 

ANNEXURES

Annexure A Municipal Performance Management Framework

 

1. BACKGROUND

The White Paper on Local Government sets out a broad vision for establishing developmental local government, calling on municipalities to find means of confronting the legacy of underdevelopment and poverty within their local areas. Herein recognition is given to integrated development planning, performance management and community participation as crucial mechanisms to achieve this.

Page 153: PMS

In addition, the Municipal Systems Act requires from municipalities to develop their own performance management systems and to set performance targets and to monitor and review their performance based on indicators that are linked to their Integrated Development Plan (IDP). Involving the community in setting indicators and targets and reviewing municipal performance are explicitly required. A critical element in the performance management process is the publication of an annual report on achieved performance for distribution to councillors, staff, the public and other spheres of government. This report needs to incorporate and report on a set of general indicators prescribed nationally by the Minister responsible for local government. Before tabling this report and having it audited by the Auditor-General, municipalities are to conduct an internal audit on performance.

The IDP for the Ulundi Municipality has been adopted and it has now become crucial to develop a Performance Management System suitable to the particular and own circumstances prevalent to the Ulundi Municipality in the quest to give effect to this IDP and achieve its goals and objectives.

2. PURPOSE OF A PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The purpose of a Performance Management System is to assure accountability on the basis of a simple, effective and management tool for the Municipal Manager and as a control tool for the Council. The Performance Management System will assist the Municipal Manager and the Executive Managers in meeting their goals and objectives by having in place a systematic process designed to, articulate and measure employee performance to IDP as well as individual (or team) standards and to help each employee reach her/his full performance potential and IDP responsibilities. A Performance Management System is therefore linked to both day-to-day management responsibilities as well as IDP responsibilities, reinforcing the commitment to deliver based on a fully integrated and publicly approved IDP.

The purpose of the IDP is to ensure that the resources available to the municipality are directed at the delivery of projects and programmes that meet agreed development priorities. Once a Municipality starts to implement the IDP, it is important to check that the delivery is happening in the planned manner, that the Municipality is using its resources most efficiently, producing the quality of delivery envisaged and that the delivery is having the planned effect on the lives of people living in the Municipal area,

To achieve this it is necessary to monitor and evaluate, measure and review the performance of the Municipality against indicators and targets set in its IDP. Performance management will thus assist the Municipality to make immediate, appropriate changes in the delivery and management of resources, identify and overcome major systematic blockages and guide future planning on development objectives and resource use.

Page 154: PMS

Achieving this requires the pro-active development of a Performance Management System and undertaking an annual review of the IDP Plan.

Performance management in local government is a tool to ensure accountability, based on the IDP, its objectives, projects and programmes, of:

The municipality to its constituents, citizens and communities; The Executive Committee to the Council; The Administration to the Executive Committee or Executive Mayor; All line, functional and sectoral managers to the Executive Management

and the portfolio and standing committees; and All employees to the organisation.

The philosophy underlying this system can best be gained through an understanding of the following terms, which characterise the Performance Management System:

Better Performance – The primary goal of the system is improved performance by all employees that will be reflected in their overall performance in meeting the IDP goals.

Builds Desire – Through clearly defined performance outcomes and expectations, shared responsibility, frequent feedback, open communications and challenging work assignments, the system is designed to foster a work environment where employees are internally motivated to do their best every day and to assist their work unit to improve its overall performance in meeting the IDP goals and objectives.

Developmental – A key element of the system is on providing the means for employees to learn more and perform better in their current jobs.

Non-punitive – The system is geared to helping every employee succeed and any employee experiencing performance problems is provided the opportunity, means, and assistance necessary to improve their performance.

Positive – The primary focus of the system is on providing the tools necessary for all employees to achieve their full performance potential.

Shared Responsibility – A successful performance management system requires both input and participation by employees, supervisors, and managers.

Simple – Through user-friendly automation aids, training, and reference material, the system is designed to be easily understood, accessible, and sensitive to time requirements.

3. MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE OF THE ULUNDI MUNICIPALITY

See overleaf

Page 155: PMS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 156: PMS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The management structure of the Ulundi Municipality is indicated in the preceding diagram. The Municipality will enter into Performance Agreements with the Municipal Manager and the individual Executive Managers as part of this Performance Management System and in compliance with the requirements of the Municipal Systems Act. These Performance Agreements will be implemented for each Executive Manager over and above the normal Employment Contracts and will be linked directly to the Performance Management System set out in this document.

For each of the core functions a Performance Charter will be developed, setting out in detail the kind of activities the responsible Executive Manager responsible need to engage in, in order to perform his/her job. These will be consolidated into a Performance Plan per Department with this Performance Plan then becoming the Annexure A to each individual Executive Manager’s Performance Agreement with the Municipality (refer to Appendix A of this document for the various proforma sheets).

4. COMPONENTS OF THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Page 157: PMS

The Performance Management System consists of the following components:

Plan – The Municipal Manager and Executive Committee share the responsibility for developing the project related and individual performance standards. All performance standards consist of outcomes (products or accomplishments) and expectations (measurement of outcomes in terms of cost, quality, quantity, time, etc.).

Monitor – The Municipal Manager and Council observe the performance of the Executive Managers and provide feedback throughout the year, not just at the end of the performance cycle. Executive Managers can provide feedback on how well the Municipal Manager and the Council carry out their performance management responsibilities.

Develop – The Municipal Manger has an open discussion with the Executive Managers to identify their training and other needs for improving his or her job performance.

Performance Summary – A narrative description of the Executive Managers’ performance, prepared by the Municipal Manager with input from the Executive Managers, is given to each Executive Manager in a face-to-face meeting. A performance summary should include: an assessment of the Executive Manager’s effectiveness in meeting his or her goals and objectives, any recognition received and areas of suggested improvement.

Recognition – The Municipal Manager and Council are encourage to reward Executive Managers throughout the year for doing their jobs well. Recognition may occur in a number of ways, i.e. verbal praise, cash awards, and time-off awards.

Page 158: PMS

5. CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS OF A PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The following factors are critical to the sustained success of a performance management system and need to be applied in developing and implementing a Performance Management System for the Ulundi Municipality:

1. Focus

The core service mission, vision, strategic objectives and values of the organisation must be sound and understood by every employee. The employee’s role in the mission and objectives must be discernible and every worker must know what they must contribute to ensure that the strategic intent is realised. Every job must have a clear mission and set of objectives, targets and measures, linked directly to the IDP.

2. Balance

Performance must be planned and measured to ensure balanced performance. Focus must be on agreed internal and external results as well as financial and non-financial results. Customer satisfaction is a key consideration in performance planning and measurements.

3. Stretch

Easy goals are sure to close the individual energy taps sooner that intended. It is essential to induce individuals to set demanding objectives and targets that require more than ordinary effort. Conversely, targets that are clearly unobtainable for various factors will have a demotivating effect on employees. The skill lies in setting goals within these two parameters.

 

 

4. Mobilisation

People are mobilised through challenges such as those fundamentally contained in objectives, standards and targets. Continuously reviewing personal results that need to be achieved and offering training where required sustain momentum. Using a single set of factors that apply to all induces stagnation and inefficient performance management.

Page 159: PMS

5. Latitude

Space for self-direction and prioritisation in the context of the overall mission of the organisation is essential as more value will be realised by the individual. A person like to be asked for his/her opinion, especially where it concerns tasks that they are responsible for. Latitude allows for the development of innovative thinking.

 

6. Contracting

Individuals must enter into a contract with their supervisors to access resources and compensation.

7. Motivation

People need a continuous stream of recognition and support to stay inspired and content with the job. Motivated employees are productive employees.

8. Measurement

A popular saying based on the business wisdom contained in "What gets measured gets done" holds true at all levels and for all jobs in which an employee has to perform. The more specific and accurate the targets and measures are, the better the value of the contributions of employees.

9. Appraisal

It is essential to put a score or value to the achievement of the individual and to be sure that it is contextually ranked and objective. Criteria for appraisal should be mutually agreed upon.

10.Feedback

Feedback induces behaviour change irrespective whether it is positive or negative. Embargoes must be placed on personal attacks that hurt the ego or self-concept of individuals as emotional disengagement is guaranteed in not done.

11.Remuneration

Page 160: PMS

This in the final analysis is the tangible proof that the individual’s contribution was appreciated. Make sure that incentives for performance are differentiated from basic remuneration. Paying for performance is the hallmark of excellence.

12.Caring

This is the invisible compensation for loyalty and commitment. Although these factors are critical they are neglected in the compensation structures of business. Caring is shown through birthday cards, flowers, kindness and small gestures to the family of the employee.

13.Visual

All of the above are of little effect if they are kept locked in filing cabinets. The mission, strategy, values and performance of the organisation and that of teams and individuals should be displayed for all to see.

6. THE TEN STEP ACTION PLAN TO EFFECT THE Ulundi PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The following Ten Steps and sections detail the components of the Ulundi Performance Management System and its development, whilst assigning roles, responsibilities and timeframes required in achieving the adoption of a Performance Management System for the Ulundi Municipality.

STEP 1

1. Assuming Responsibility

The Municipal Systems Act requires that each municipality develop a performance management systems, to set performance targets and to monitor and review their performance based on indicators that are linked to the IDP. For this to be realised it is necessary for the municipality to actually take on this responsibility. In the case of the Ulundi Municipality it is assumed that the responsibility of developing an appropriate Performance Management System has been delegated to the Municipal Manager and the Executive Committee. This Step has therefore already been executed and sets in motion the process of developing a fully-fledged Ulundi Performance Management System.

Success Factors: All, i.e. Factors 5.1 – 5.13

STEP 2

Page 161: PMS

2. Project Team

To facilitate the development of the Ulundi Performance Management System and in compliance with the legislative and regulatory framework, the first and most critical step in the process is the establishment of a project team. The following will apply to the Performance Management System Project Team:

Membership: The Project Team is to be constituted by Executive Managers within the Ulundi Municipality and Councillors that are familiar with the IDP process.

Leadership: This should rest with the Municipal Manager. Responsibilities: The Project Team is responsible for overseeing the

process of developing and implementing the Performance Manager System for Ulundi, providing guidance that is based on the goals, objectives and policies of the IDP and principles of good governance.

Participation: Stakeholders from the Ulundi Municipality and community need to be identified as part of a participation process in the development and implementation of the Ulundi Performance Management System.

Success Factors: All, i.e. Factors 5.1 – 5.13

STEP 3

1. Participation

Once the Project Team has been established, their first task would be to set up a workshop session with (a) all employees of the Ulundi Municipality and (b) all the Ulundi stakeholders to inform them of what the Performance Management System would be, what it would involve and what change it will most likely bring about. This implies that all stakeholders will be identified and a database set up containing all the relevant stakeholder information. Involving the Ulundi stakeholders from the onset of the Performance Management Process will ensure the participation of the Ulundi communities in determining the output of the Municipality in terms of meeting community needs.

Success Factors: 5.1 and 5.13

STEP 4

2. Developing the Ulundi Performance Management System

This means a framework that describes and represents how the municipality’s cycle and performance planning, monitoring, measurement, review and reporting

Page 162: PMS

will happen, be organised and be managed, whilst determining the roles of different role players, i.e.:

Demonstrates how it will operate and be managed from the planning stage up to the stages of performance review and reporting.

Defines the roles and responsibilities of each role-player, including the local community, in the functioning of the system.

Clarifies the process of implementing the system within the framework of the IDP process.

Determines the frequency of reporting and the lines of accountability for performance.

Links the organisational performance to employee performance. Provides for the procedure by which the system is linked with the

municipality’s IDP processes. Show how any general key performance indicators (KPIs) contained in the

Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations, 2001, will be incorporated into the municipality’s planning and monitoring processes.

The minimum requirements of a Performance Management System are:

A consolidated list of development indicators for the IDP objectives. A tabular compilation of the output targets for all IDP projects. A time schedule with dates of major milestones of all projects. A list of performance indicators, which are, not project specific. An action plan including resource requirements for managing the

performance management system, including information flow, timing and responsible actors.

The Project Team needs to plan how the process for developing this System will be managed within the legislative framework. Specifically, they should focus on assessing the current reality, identifying stakeholders that will participate in this process and establishing structures to facilitate the actual development of the System.

 

The Performance Management System consists of the following components:

1. Planning

The Ulundi IDP forms the basis of this component, providing the institutional analysis and assessment of the Municipality’s capacity, ability, resources, systems and procedures in developing and implementing a Performance Management System. Essentially this step involves an assessment of how planning, implementation and monitoring is happening in the Municipality and identifying gaps in terms of planning and performance management

Page 163: PMS

requirements. The development of the Performance Management System will, amongst others, address the identified gaps.

6.4.2 Planning

The Ulundi IDP fulfils the planning stage of the Municipality’s Performance Management System which in turn fulfils the implementation, management, monitoring and evaluation of the IDP. This involves a seamless integration between the IDP planning process and the Performance Management process with the IDP outputs defining what performance is to be managed. The Municipal Manager and Executive Committee share the responsibility for developing the project related and individual performance standards. All performance standards consist of outcomes (products or accomplishments) and expectations (measurement of outcomes in terms of cost, quality, quantity, time, etc.).

The following provides a summary of what a performance plan should entail:

A performance plan is a two-part written document between an employee (or team) and their supervisor, describing what has to be done during the performance cycle, how well it has to be done, and how will accomplishment be measured. This first part of the plan is based on the goals, objectives, projects and priorities of the Ulundi IDP as well as the employees' position description or career level definitions, i.e. his/her day-to-day management responsibilities and functions. The second part identifies training, developmental work assignments, individual development desires and/or other developmental needs proposed for/by the employee for the upcoming cycle.

All plans shall be developed within 30 days of the beginning of the performance cycle.

At an appropriate time during the performance cycle, upward feedback will be utilised to assess supervisor/manager compliance in the development of the plan.

All plans shall include clearly defined outcomes and expectations, clear linkage to organisational goals, Position essential development needs and opportunity for personal and career developmental activities (long term and/or short term).

Each employee shall have a documented performance plan in place within 30 days of the beginning of the performance cycle.

The responsibilities in performance planning include the following:

SUPERVISOR’S RESPONSIBILITY EMPLOYEE’S RESPONSIBILITY

1. Initiate the plan based on the upcoming work assignments of the work unit.

1. Review previous plan and performance summary.

Assure that the plan can be linked to the next 2. Review organisational goals and their

Page 164: PMS

levels' goals. individual role in accomplishing those goals.

Effectively communicate expectations and outcomes to employees.

3. Understand what element of performance will be measured (outcomes) and how it will be measured (expectation).

Identify meaningful training to assist in accomplishing mission.

4. Communicate individual developmental training, desires, and needs prior to the establishment of the plan.

Implementation of the plan within 30 days of the start of the performance cycle.

5. Provide upward feedback regarding jointly developed performance plan.

Maintain official copy of performance plan for continuous feedback.

6. Maintain employee's copy of performance plan for continuous feedback.

An essential part of this performance plan is the individual learning plan. This Plan will indicate the training and development activities required to assist an employee in obtaining the skills and knowledge required in order to advance in his/her career. This is of particular relevance where new competencies are allocate to a Department, over and above the core functions, and the Executive Manager has to be capacitated through training to maintain an agreed upon level of performance in respect of such new competencies. It is critical that employees not be scored negatively during the Performance Evaluation process where they have been allocated new competencies without the opportunity to obtain the appropriate skills and knowledge to fulfill their performance responsibilities in this respect.

Success Factors: 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4

6.4.3 Priority Setting

Priorities, linked to the IDP objectives that need to be achieved are set based on the long-term vision for the Ulundi Municipality. These are based on identified needs and what can realistically be achieved in the current term of office. These priorities would therefore contribute significantly to the achievement of the development vision as contained and detailed in the Ulundi IDP. Also included is a set of internal transformation strategies, priorities and objectives which, when achieved, would enable the delivery of services, local economic development and the realisation of the development vision.

Essentially priorities have already been set in terms of the adopted IDP for Ulundi. These need to be assessed, clustered and agreed upon in order to facilitate the development of the key performance indicators that will follow. Focus should broadly be on:

Page 165: PMS

Infrastructure and service delivery; Social and economic development; Institutional transformation; Democracy and governance; Financial management; and The spatial manifestation of these elements.

All components of the IDP, whether strategies or priority areas, need to be translated into a set of clear, concise and tangible statements of objectives that focus on the results individual employees are expected to achieve in their job. Such statements need to SMART.WW, i.e. Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Time related, Worthwhile and in Writing. In terms of this there is a specific focus on outcome and impact and specific consideration needs to be given to the results desired, the wording and intention of each objective and the scope and nature of the change desired. These can then be translated into performance deliverables, showing the steps that need to be taken in order to achieve each key objective.

Success Factors: 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5

6.4.4 Setting Key Performance Indicators

A Project Implementation Plan is prepared for each IDP priority to be implemented within the current financial year. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are set for each of these individual Project Implementation Plans as measurement units against which progress made in achieving the IDP goals can be gauged. It is thus a measure that is used to provide evidence or proof of whether or not an IDP priority project and the related IDP objectives have been met. Such KPIs must be developed with the following in mind:

The result must be within the control of the incumbent; The indicators must be objectives and observable; and Data must be available for measurement.

Performance or non-performance will be measured against the KPIs and are determined in relation to what the expected outcomes are as set by the KPIs. Various types of indicators are used to set the KPIs, i.e.:

INDICATOR DESCRIPTION SUMMARY EXAMPLE

Input Indicators Efficiency/Cost Measuring economy and efficiency

The unit cost of delivering water to a single household or the amount of time, money or number of people it took the municipality to deliver water to a single

Page 166: PMS

household.

Output Indicators

Effectiveness/Achieve Desired Results/ Quantity

Measuring whether a set of activities or processes yields the desired products. These indicators are usually expressed in quantitative terms, i.e. as a number or a %.

The number of percentage of household that will be connected to electricity as a result of the municipality’s electrification programme.

Outcome Indicators

Impact/How Affects the Community/Quality

Measuring the quality as well as the impact of the products resulting from achieving the overall objectives. In terms of impact the net effect of the products/services on the overall objectives is measured.

Does the service provided to households comply with applicable standards or what % reduction is expected in the number of houses burnt due to the use of other sources of energy as a result of the electrification programme.

Composite Indicators

Relationship between Indicators

Combining a set of different indicators into one index by developing a mathematical relationship between them.

 

Baseline Indicators

Status Quo Showing the status quo or current situation.

Level of poverty, service delivery and infrastructure standards.

Success Factors: 5.1, 5.2, and 5.8

6.4.5 Setting Targets

Performance targets are the planned level of performance or the milestones the Ulundi Municipality will set for itself for each of the KPIs that has been set. These targets are expressed in terms of quality or time and the first step towards setting performance targets is to identify the baseline measurements, i.e. the measurement of each indicator at the beginning of the performance period. In identifying targets to be achieved, the following applies:

The targets need to be realistic, measurable and be commensurate with available resources and capacities.

The public needs to be consulted on their needs and expectations. Politicians need to give clear direction as far as the importance of the

target and how it will address the public needs are concerned. Targets should be informed by the development needs of communities

and the development priorities of the municipality.

Success Factors: 5.3 and 5.4

Page 167: PMS

STEP 5

1. Contractual Commitment and Agreements

Individual performance in the Municipal System today is directly linked to the implementation of a Municipality’s IDP. Once performance targets have been set and agreed upon by the Municipal Manager, Executive Managers and Project Team, decision-makers must then make a contractual commitment to achieve these targets within the agreed upon timeframes. The KPIs and target that have been in relation thereto should be included as Annexure A to the contractual agreement of the Executive Managers and Municipal Manager of the Ulundi Municipality.

Success Factors: 5.6 and 5.13

STEP 6

2. Publication of the Performance Management System

Once the Ulundi Performance Management System and Contractual Agreements have been developed, agreed upon and signed by the Project Team, the Council and the relevant stakeholders, the Municipality must publish this Performance Management System in the local media for any further comment and input. Public approval of the Ulundi Performance Management System is critical to the success of this System as it will (a) indicate the needs that will be addressed, without creating false expectations and (b) confirm the Municipality’s commitment to delivery in terms of their responsibilities

Success Factors: 5.13

STEP 7

3. Adoption of the System

A final draft of the Performance Management System must be prepared by the Project Team, incorporating comments and input received as a result of the publication of this Performance Management System. The Council should adopt the Performance Management System for Ulundi when it is satisfied that the process was handled in accordance with the legislative framework and complies with the requirements of the law.

Success Factors: 5.13

Page 168: PMS

STEP 8

4. Monitoring Framework

The development of the monitoring framework runs parallel to the implementation of the Ulundi IDP and involves a process of making accurate and objective performance observations based on the performance plan's outcomes and expectations and providing timely feedback throughout the performance cycle to encourage maximisation of performance. Monitoring involves the collection of data, providing feedback, making performance observations, documenting results and managing the overall process.

Monitoring in the context of the IDP review refers to the gathering of data into sets of information about certain actions, events and situations throughout the year. Three main bodies of information are important as input into the review process.

Implementation management information: This refers to information that measures progress with the implementation of programmes and projects through a series of indicators such as completion timeframes, use of resources such as money and staff, etc.

Information about the achievement of objectives set in the IDP: This will have to be measured over time in terms of the indicators that have been set to determine whether the outcomes aimed for have been achieved.

New information: This may be generated from internal or external sources and reflects changes to the internal or external context of the Municipal area that impacts in the appropriateness of the IDP and include information such as baseline data on demographics, new policy and legislation, budget information from other spheres of government, more or improved in-depth information about the existing situation and priority issues, information about new developments and trends, changes in the existing situation due to unexpected events such as natural disasters, new investment opportunities, etc.

Information capturing will relate specifically to capturing data and information on the activities of the different line departments and will best be done on an individual IDP project basis. The information required and the frequency of the data and information need to be determined for each individual IDP project and will relate to the nature of the project, its implementation programme and the requirements of the measurement of the KPIs.

This information needs monitoring and recording throughout the year for consideration in the review process. The organizing of data and collation of information is the responsibility of the Municipal Manager or IDP Manager who has to put in place and co-ordinate a process or system for this purpose and designate roles to appropriate persons. Such data and information also needs to

Page 169: PMS

be considered appropriately in the Performance Evaluation process of the Ulundi Performance Management System. Various tools can be used to this end, e.g. a project information/data capture sheet, project close down report, etc.

Success Factors: 5.8, 5.9, 5.10 and 5.11

STEP 9

1. Performance Evaluation

The information gathered through the process of monitoring is assessed to understand its relevance and implications to the priority issues, objectives, indicators and targets. This information should in particular be focused on an analysis and synthesis, which is relevant to the Ulundi IDP.

Performance evaluation will be provided from multiple sources and refers to the analysis of data received from the monitoring system in order to assess performance. The intent is to capture input from those who have had the best opportunity to accurately observe the performance of the Municipal Manager and Executive Managers. In all cases:

The Municipal Manager shall provide input to the performance of the Executive Managers, and the Council input to the performance of the Municipal Manager.

Executive Managers may provide self-observation to supplement the input of the Municipal Manager.

The Municipal Manager may receive anonymous performance management observations from immediate subordinates.

The Municipal Manager shall have the opportunity to provide input to the Executive Managers regarding resources required for performance management application.

Depending on the position, input sources might eventually include peers, other supervisors and stakeholders. At least one of these sources would be included as input. Conducting performance reviews, assisting in improving performance on the basis of analysing measured performance.

Operationally, the act of observing performance and providing feedback is an ongoing and continuous process, occurring during normal interactions at work. Informal sessions can occur weekly or even daily as a way of addressing priorities and achieving outcomes. Frequency of the feedback may vary based on the tenure of the employee or the dynamics of the position. On a formal basis, face to face feedback between the Council, the Municipal Manager and the Executive Managers should be provided and discussed 2 or 3 times per year.

Page 170: PMS

Performance evaluation is based on a scoring system with the Performance Plan as the point of departure. All aspects of performance are evaluated and scored and then consolidated into the Consolidated Score Sheet (refer to Appendix A) to provide a final performance score for each employee that is evaluated. This methodology also closely relates to the amendment of the IDP as it will serve to inform the review phase.

Feedback will be used by an employee to obtain a comprehensive view of performance effectiveness. With this perspective, an employee may need to adjust their priorities, approach, or work style to improve effectiveness. Additionally, feedback may provide useful indicators of potential developmental needs, resource shortcomings and requirements, inadequate policy or strategy, to name but a few .

The responsibilities in the monitoring process involve the following:

SUPERVISOR’S RESPONSIBILITY EMPLOYEE’S RESPONSIBILITY

1. Conduct and provide ongoing performance observations while providing meaningful feedback to employees

1. Conduct and provide meaningful self-observations to supervisor

Conduct face-to-face interview with each employee at a minimum semi-annually.

2. Prepare for face-to-face interviews

Utilise feedback to adjust performance (as related to Performance Management)

3. Utilise feedback to adjust performance

If appropriate, recognise performance, through effective monitoring, in a timely manner during performance cycle.

4. Provide other feedback (team, peer, customer) as appropriate during performance cycle

Provide upward feedback regarding immediate supervisor’s compliance with the Performance Management Process

5. Provide upward feedback regarding immediate supervisor’s compliance with the Performance Management Process

At this point it is also important to assess how performance could be improved. Good and excellent performance need to be maintained and acknowledged in order to meet the needs of citizens and improve their quality of life. Poor performance, however, needs to be specifically addressed and ways and means designed to improve on such performance. The following table gives an indication of the possible causes for poor performance and the strategy that could be chosen in response to redress such poor performance:

 

Page 171: PMS

CAUSE OF POOR PERFORMANCE RESPONSE STRATEGY

Inappropriate structure Restructuring within the organisation

Poor systems and processes Improvements to systems and processes

Lack of skills and capacity Training and sourcing additional capacity

Inappropriate organisational culture Change management and introduce and educational programme

Absence of appropriate strategy Revision of strategy by key decision-makers

Typically, a performance evaluation procedure will include the following:

A formal performance review occurs once a year in June, before the end of the financial year.

The Municipal Manager may request input from customers, i.e. people who are able to comment on performance because they have worked closely with such an Executive Manager, on the Executive Manager’s performance throughout the review period.

The Municipal Manager will prepare ratings of the Executive Manager’s performance against objectives as a result of his/her evidence and customer input.

The Municipal Manager will ask the Executive Manager to prepare for formal appraisal by rating himself/herself against the agreed objectives.

The Municipal Manager and Executive Manager will meet to conduct a formal performance rating and agree on final scores. In the event of a disagreement, the Municipal Manager has the final say with regard to the final score given.

Initially the scoring should be recorded on the scorecard and then transferred onto the consolidated score sheet.

Deadline dates met or not met should be clearly marked.

KPIs that have or have not been supplied as evidence of achieving an objective should also be marked.

Any reasons for non-compliance should be recorded during the review session.

The Municipal Manager should make his/her own notes during the formal review meeting and should assign a score in relation to the weighting assigned to a specific objective.

Only those items relevant for the review period in question should be scored.

The Municipal Manager and Executive Manager should prepare and agree on an individual learning plan and set new objectives, targets,

Page 172: PMS

performance indicators, weightings, dates, etc. for the following financial year.

Poor work performance will be dealt in terms of the incapacity procedure as outlined in the applicable Labour Legislation.

Success Factors: 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 5.10 and 5.11

STEP 10

1. Reporting on Performance

Reporting on performance to the Council and stakeholders in the form of a performance summary is an annual process of documentation and discussion between the Municipal Manager, Executive Committee and Council which is also open for public scrutiny. This annual report is legislatively required and must be available to the public.

The performance summary or report is a consolidation, discussion, and acknowledgement of accomplishments and effectiveness throughout the performance cycle. It provides an assessment of actual achievements based on the outcomes and expectations contained in the performance plan, includes a synopsis of formal feedback received during the performance cycle and contains highlights of developmental activities undertaken during the period. The performance summary represents the review of record for the performance cycle.

At a minimum, the performance summary is an annual process of documentation and discussion between the Municipal Manager and Executive Managers and should occur within 30 days from the end of the performance cycle.

This mechanism of reporting on the performance may be used for:

Identifying developmental needs; Identifying shortcomings in resource availability, institutional capacity,

strategy, etc.; Determining compliance with the agreed upon performance plan; Analysing individual [or team] performance in terms of the IDP goals and

objectives; A basis for individual recognition; A basis for team acknowledgement and recognition; and A point of consolidation of feedback from the performance cycle.

Responsibilities related to reporting on performance and the compilation of the actual performance report or summary include:

SUPERVISOR’S RESPONSIBILITY EMPLOYEE’S RESPONSIBILITY

Page 173: PMS

1. Consolidate data from entire performance cycle

1. Provide meaningful input to assist supervisor/manager in summarising individual accomplishments of the performance cycle

Identify developmental needs for the upcoming performance cycle based on the results of the performance summary

2. Identify developmental needs for the upcoming performance cycle based on the previous cycle

Effectively communicate summary of expectations and outcomes to employee

3. Prepare to discuss summary of expectations and outcomes

Prepare to initiate the next performance plan based on the past performance cycle and upcoming work assignments of the work unit

4. Review feedback obtained during performance cycle and begin to formulate ideas for upcoming performance plan

Success Factors: 5.11, 5.12 and 5.13

7. ACTION, ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND TIMEFRAMES

The following table summarises the previously detailed 10 Steps involved in developing a Performance Management System for the Ulundi Municipality and allocates responsibilities and timeframes to each of these Steps:

REF. ACTION DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBILITY TIMEFRAME

6.1 Accepting Responsibility

The Municipal Manager and Executive Committee accept responsibility for developing the Performance Management System.

This must be done officially and in writing.

Municipal Manager

Executive Committee

Council report to serve ASAP

6.2 Project Team Establishment of Project Team.

Led by delegated official.

Constituted by people involved and familiar with the IDP process.

Steering function. Reporting to the

Municipal Manager.

Identification of stakeholders and establishment of

Municipal Manager

Executive Committee

Simultaneous to report outlined above

Page 174: PMS

structures to facilitate the development of the Performance Management System.

6.3 Participation Workshop session in the process of managing the change process.

Project Team Supported by the Executive Manager: Corporate Services

Within 2 weeks of Council approval initial report

6.4 Develop the Performance Management System

A framework that describes and represents how the municipality’s cycle and performance planning, monitoring, measurement, review and reporting will happen, be organised and be managed, whilst determining the roles of different role players. The following components make up the Performance Management System:

Project Team to submit a report to Council

To be initiated as soon as workshop session has been completed and feedback interpreted

Planning - The IDP fulfils the planning stage of performance management.

Project Team together with Executive Managers

Completed – it is assumed that Interim IDP serves this purpose

  Priority Setting - A set of priorities and objectives based on identified needs, achievable in the current term of office and that would contribute significantly to the achievement of the development vision.

Project Team together with Executive Managers

Completed – it is assumed that Interim IDP serves this purpose

Setting Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Project Team together with Executive Managers

3 days per Executive Manager

Setting Targets Project Team together with Executive Managers

3 days per Executive Manager

6.5 Contractual Commitment and

Based on targets that have been set contractual agreements are finalised for

Project Team together with Municipal Manager and

Within 14 days of finalisation and agreement

Page 175: PMS

Agreements the Municipal Manager and Executive Managers.

Executive Managers of targets

6.6 Publication of the System

The Performance Management System developed and agreed upon is to be published in the local media for comment and input.

Executive Manager: Corporate Services

Within 14 days of signing of contractual agreements and allowing 14 days for comments and input

6.7 Adoption of the System

Final draft of the Performance Management System to be prepared, incorporating comments and input received.

Project Team Within 14 days after the closing date for the submission of comment and input

6.8 Monitoring Framework

Developing a process of: Making accurate and

objective performance observations based on the performance plan's outcomes and expectations.

Providing timely feedback throughout the performance cycle to encourage employees to maximise their performance.

Involving the collection of data, documenting results and managing the overall process.

Project Team together with Municipal Manager and Executive Managers

Simultaneous with development of the Performance Management System

6.9 Performance Evaluation

Conducting performance reviews, assisting in improving performance on the basis of analysing measured performance.

Project Team together with Municipal Manager and Executive Managers

At least twice a year, but preferably quarterly

6.10 Reporting on performance.

Reporting on performance to the Council and stakeholders.

Project Team together with Municipal Manager and Executive Managers

Annually within 30 days after the end of the performance cycle

8. A WORD ON RECOGNITION

Page 176: PMS

To maintain a high level of motivation and performance, recognition needs to be given to employees that achieve their performance goals. This is a means of rewarding employees for sustained outstanding performance and service and providing incentives to continuing to do so. Recognition should be linked to performance outcomes and employees should be recognised or rewarded for being result-oriented and IDP-focused.

To facilitate an appropriate financial rewarding system, the Performance Management System for Ulundi requires a Remuneration Policy to be in place. Within this Remuneration Policy recognition needs to be made of the Performance Management Contracts of the Municipal Manager and the Executive Managers and the implications of these contracts on financial resources, bonus payouts, etc. Based on the Performance Evaluation process and the scoring in terms of this process, the Municipal Manager and Executive Managers will receive their performance bonuses and budgetary provision would be required.

Measures of reward and recognition that can be used include time-off, monetary, and others types of recognition (i.e. tickets to a local event, dinner) and should be focused on:

The ability to recognise a team as well as an individual accomplishment; Achievements based on every day superior contribution as well as high

visibility projects; Recognition based on performance criteria, i.e. there are clear guidelines

on what it takes to be recognised; Monetary and non-monetary; Timely to the event; and Handled at first level of supervision.

8.1 Remuneration Policy Guidelines

The Performance Agreement’s requires that the Ulundi Municipality must have a Remuneration Policy that sets out the link between performance and reward for the Municipal Manager and the Managers.

It is essential that the remuneration policy is clear i.e. there must be no confusion in the minds of the Municipal Manager and the Managers reporting to the Municipal Manager what the remuneration policy is in relation to linking the results of their performance to reward.

In the preparation of a remuneration policy the following aspects need to be taken into account; namely:

Cost of living increase;

Page 177: PMS

Merit increase; and

Outstanding performance

The remuneration policy therefore need to link the results of the performance review to that of the employee’s pay. The option put forward reads as follows; namely:

The Employee receives an annual cost of living increase and a merit / performance bonus for outstanding performance based on the result of his / her performance score.

The option put forward need to consider the following in the preparation of the remuneration policy.

There is a cost of living increase based on the affordability of the Municipality.

A merit increase above the cost of living increase will be awarded to employees who obtain high performance scores. The amount awarded is further dependent on the affordability of the Municipality.

The performance score is obtained using the performance plan.

Should external factors play a major role in impacting negatively on an employee’s ability to meet the required standards of performance, it is at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee whether or not the employee should be entitled to a merit increase.

The merit increase along with the annual cost of living increase will be awarded annually at the beginning of the financial year, after the performance appraisal.

The amount of the merit increase will be determined by the score resulting from the performance appraisal and will be calculated as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Page 178: PMS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9. CONCLUSION

Performance Management in the local municipality is a two way communication process between the municipality and the community that is making use of municipal services. The performance of the municipality is then measure against specific key development priority objectives and performance indicators which have been discussed and analysed and agreed upon during the IDP process.

The Performance Management System put forward is potentially the only area of management that can significantly contribute to the overall municipal performance.

Attached as Annexure A is the Municipal Performance Management Framework for Ulundi. The framework forms an integrated part of the Integrated Development Plan (IDP) process with specific reference to Key Performance Areas (KPA’s ), development objectives, Key Performance Indicators (KPI"s), targets, etc which directly feeds into the vision, objectives, strategies and programmes/projects identified and developed.

The implementation of a Performance Management System for the Ulundi Municipality, as outlined in this document will have the following benefits:

An improvement of Departmental performance in many key areas including stakeholder satisfaction, reduction of procurement lead-times, on-time delivery, employee satisfaction and cost efficiency of all operations;

The delivery of IDP projects and programmes with an evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency in this regard;

Input into the review of the Ulundi IDP; An improved relationship between the Municipal Manager, Executive

Committee, Ulundi Council and Council officials – one built on mutual respect and co-operation;

Page 179: PMS

An assessment process that is uniformly well-received, particularly by stakeholders who are pleased that their needs and expectations are being addressed;

The development of useful information for management; and The creation of an environment that encourages continuous improvement.