PLJ_2011HR051
-
Upload
satish-shukla -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of PLJ_2011HR051
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
1/13
TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST
SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS
TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST
SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS
TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST
SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS
TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST
SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS
TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST
SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST
SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS
TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTSSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS
TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST
SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS
Personal Learning Journal
Organizational Behavior
1/18/2012
Satish Kumar Shukla-2011HR051
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
2/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
2
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
Contents
Lecture-1) ................................................................................................................................................ 3
Lecture-2) ................................................................................................................................................ 4
Lecture:3 ................................................................................................................................................. 5
Lecture: 4 ................................................................................................................................................ 7
Lecture 5) ................................................................................................................................................ 8
Lecture 6) ................................................................................................................................................ 9
Assignment Questions: ...................................................................................................................... 10
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
3/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
3
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
Lecture-1)
Pre Readings:
y What great managers do!y What makes an effective manager!
Observations:
1) While I was interviewing the manager, Mr.Ganpat Chaudhary, at Sindhi Society Gym Restaurant for
my compensation project, I came to know of several facts about his management style. This middle aged
gentleman had managed not to lose a single employee in the last 1 year and had improved the satisfaction
level ofhis employees. When I asked him about his efficient management style, he pointed towards
certain new practices that he had incorporated after joining the restaurant.
He spent less time in the office and more time on the floor, interacting with
different employees. Based on this he understood their strengths, also he emphasized on team structure.
Through these interactions he identified the strengths ofhis employees and deployed them accordingly.
He emphasized on strengths of employees rather than criticizing them. Terms like Boys were used for
the employees, this motivated the employees. He also observed that they expect some returns from the
restaurants, so food was given to them at the end of the day and employee of the month scheme was
brought. Through these simple steps he was able to bring attrition to 0 in last year.
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
4/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
4
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
Lecture-2)Topics Covered:
y Self Efficacyy Self Handicappingy Organization Based Self Esteem
Observations:
I realized that I have a lot of dimensions to myself and would neverhave realized this lest
for the OB class. During the preparation for management, my instructor at the coaching used social
persuasion to improve myself efficacy; this in turn helped me to finally enter into a prestigious institute.
Also, the reflected best self exercise made me realize the fact that I have a lot of strengths and have never
worked upon them, this is turn has made me weak as a whole as too much focus on improving my
weakness has led me to change my personality a lot. This hampered my overall growth.
Also, I realized the importance of inspirational speeches and could relate to the movie
Chak De India and Miracle. Before this class I thought that these things happen in movie only, but
looking back at my own life I have realized that these things have happened as small instances that have
made me achieve wonders.
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
5/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
5
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
Lecture: 3Pre Readings:
y Can you handle failuresy Abrasive Personalityy Personality & Intelligence
Observations:
After going through the articles I tried to apply the personality type to myself and
realized that I am an abrasive personality type. The first personalities that come to my mind are Lee
Iacocca in Chrysler and Steve Jobs in Apple. Also, I can link this kind of personality to another kind of
leadership, Level 4, leadership as mentioned in the book Good To Great by Jim Collins. Below I will
mention some of the similarities I tried to find out among the two concepts:
Traits Steve Jobs (Apple)
1) Extremely Intelligent
2) He was involved in all the process of formulation of projects and even managed thelayout of initial apple stores himelf.
3) Steve Jobs was quick to build new products like Mac computer but he did not respect
his colleagues and as a result his team seldom had members being repeated.
4) Jobs raised the issue of firing Scully because ofhis overwhelming competitive instinctsbut in turn got him fired.
5) After refusal to go ahead withMac computer, Steve Jobs created an own cabin with apirate flag on it and asked for an independent division, whichhe was granted.
Afterh
e joined Apple again,h
e became more matured andh
idh
is private life. So it is difficult to judgewhetherhe did improve himself or not and ifhe did then what were the steps involved. But it is
interesting to see similar type of concepts arising, reading the article of Abrasive Personality I think I can
carefully take a stand as it is a requirement for Level 4 leadership.
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
6/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
6
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
1
References:
1) Good To Great: Jim Collin
2) UTV Bloomberg Documentary on Steve Jobs
1Page:20, Good To Great. The Diagram has been adapted and theconcept of Abrasive personality has been
added.
Level-5:Executive
Level-4:
Effective Leader
Level-3: CompetentManager
Level-2: Contributing TeamMember
Le
ve
l-1: Highly Capable
Individual
Abrasive Personality
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
7/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
7
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
Lecture: 4Topics Covered:
y Transactional Analysisy Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Observations:
My scores in transactional analysis were different in the test because I had undergone this
test once. So this did not fascinate me much. The other test given to which was the MBT indicator, which
showed our personality type. MY personality came out to be ESTJ. I observed a pattern in how the test
emerged and tried to gauge the conclusions, some of the guys and girls were always late in outings and
did not confirm till the last moment, these are the same people who got the personality type as perceived,
so I realized that with these people there is not point to plan anything and that is why many a times it lead
to conflicts because I was a Judgmental personality.
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
8/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
8
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
Lecture 5)Topics Covered:
y Perceptiony Attribution
Observations:
After learning this chapter, I tried to analyze the reason for the perception of my FW guide
Mrs. Kajli Mukherjee towards me. I tried to apply the attribution theory to gauge the reasons forher
judgment towards me as an inefficient individual. She did not take into account whether the factors could
be internal or external. I tried to analyze her on the basis of attribution theory:
Distinctivness: She came late to work, responded me not to come to office and send me mails on
Saturday and Sunday. This shows that she was very unorganized. (LOW)
Consensus: Not everyones feedback can be taken, but Noopal Sharma who had gone to the same
organization for the Fieldwork also reported that Ms. Mukherjee burdened her with too much work and
did not guide much and also reprimanded her. So, I was also reacting the same way as Noopal did by
informing my FieldWork guide about the behavior. (HIGH)
Consistency: She did not provide any feedback on any submission to me but criticized me and did not
give me some strong points to improve. So there was low consistency in terms of not taking me seriously
in FW by my guide. (LOW)
This points out that there was some external reason forher behavior and it could have been that she was
not prepared for a FW intern and was demanding too much without a proper structure which was leading
to a chaotic situation.
Biases in Her Behavior
1) Selective Perception: She was seeing my works and responsibilities only from the organization point
of view and did not listen to my reservations and termed them as excuses.
2) Stereotyping: She judged me on the basis of being a Fresher, without informing me as to what to do
properly she said, I never wanted fresher as interns. So it was in a sense stereotyping that affected her
perception about me.
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
9/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
9
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
Lecture 6)Topics Covered
y Attitudes & Values
During my FieldWork, I decided to apply organizational behavior in all aspects. I tried to see why my
attitude was negative towards my guide in the organization. Applying the ABC model, I came through the
following conclusion:
1) Cognitive: My guide reprimanded my each and every work and pointed mistakes. These mistakes were
trivial and no guidance was given as to how to improve the quality of the work. She emphasized more on
copy pasting the solutions rather than spending time to actually arriving on it.
2) Affective: I do not like my guide; my previous guide ensured that I learnt something every day.
3) Behavioral: I made a complaint of my FW supervisor to the faculties and my enthusiasm for FW also
died down.
These three components collectively combined together to form a negative attitude about my Field Work
Organization
.
NegativeAttitude
Behavioral
Affective
Cognitive
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
10/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
10
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
Assignment Questions:
Q-1) List three values held in high regard by your family. Are these practiced? If not, why not? What is
the effect?
Ans-1) The following three values are kept in high regard by my family:
y Wearing A Sacred Thready Eating only Vegetarian Foody Marrying In The Same Caste
1) Wearing A Sacred Thread: This value is not followed by the third generation of the family. Mainly
because of the living style and the fast paced life in metro cities. As a result the traditions that have to be
carried out daily have been forgotten and the culture of prayers is finished.
2) Eating Only Vegetarian Food: This practice is still widely followed in the family.
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
11/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
11
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
3) Marrying In The Same Caste: This is a value that is more out of social pressure and due to the fear of
being boycotted from the society. So, this value is still adopted by the generation.
Q-2) Interview two managers in your FW organization to find out their three most important values.
Also discuss whether their organization gives them opportunities to practice those values?
Ans-2) Mr. Ravindra Hirejagner: The three most important values listed by Mr. Ravindra were as follows:
y TeamWorky Transparencyy TimeManagement
TeamWork: The team of accounts and human resource management sat on the same floor to improve
the cross functional understanding of teams and increase cooperation among them.
Transparency: A record of every deal with vendors is made and no gifts in any what so ever form are
accepted to maintain the transparency in organization.
Time Management: There is a strong focus on time management and any individual missing the
commitmenthas to face punis
hment for it.
Mrs. Kajli Mukherjee: The three most important values listed by Mrs. Kajli were as follows
y Transparencyy Qualityy Customer Focus
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
12/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
12
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
Transparency: A record of every deal with vendors is made and no gifts in any what so ever form are
accepted to maintain the transparency in organization.
Quality: Each and every process is properly monitored and proper audits are in place to ensure that the
products are ofhigh quality.
Customer Focus: The customer is always kept on high focus. This is ensured throughhigh quality
products.
Q-3)Interview a manager from an organization. Find out which one value, according to him, has
helped the organization acquire its unique identity. Which two values would he like the organization to
practice?
Ans-3) Mr. Harendra Nath Shukla (Assistant General Manager, Grasim Industries Nagda): According to
him, Employee Welfare has been the single most important value of Grasim Industries. Even during the
recession of 2009, Grasim gave increment to its employees and also no Vountry Retirement Scheme hadbeen force upon employees in the past 12 years. Also, the facilities had increased and this had given
Grasim Industries a unique identity. According to Mr. Shukla, this was one of the reasons why most of
the people who joined the organization were people who had families and were above the age of 40. It
had acquired the image of being a retirement heaven. Through this image Grasim is able to leverage on
experience of individuals who join in from different places. Also, the lower rung colleges are approached
for attracting young talent which is then groomed under the experience eyes of senior players. As a result
of practices like these Aditya Birla Group (ABG) has been consistently in the top two employers in India
since 2007.
-
8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051
13/13
Personal Learning Journal: OB1
13
Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051
According to Mr. Shukla the organization should practice:
1) Transparency: He saw this as the only value that Grasim should implement more. Grasim has a
major domination of Marwari jains and baniyas and hence the promotion policies are skewed and not
transparent. So he feels that employees could be more efficient when people are given promotion on the
basis of a transparent process. This will ensure that at the higher echelons of the organization only able
people are having a say.