PLJ_2011HR051

download PLJ_2011HR051

of 13

Transcript of PLJ_2011HR051

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    1/13

    TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST

    SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS

    TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST

    SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS

    TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST

    SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS

    TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST

    SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS

    TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST

    SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST

    SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS

    TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTSSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS

    TISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISST

    SSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTISSTIS

    Personal Learning Journal

    Organizational Behavior

    1/18/2012

    Satish Kumar Shukla-2011HR051

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    2/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    2

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    Contents

    Lecture-1) ................................................................................................................................................ 3

    Lecture-2) ................................................................................................................................................ 4

    Lecture:3 ................................................................................................................................................. 5

    Lecture: 4 ................................................................................................................................................ 7

    Lecture 5) ................................................................................................................................................ 8

    Lecture 6) ................................................................................................................................................ 9

    Assignment Questions: ...................................................................................................................... 10

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    3/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    3

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    Lecture-1)

    Pre Readings:

    y What great managers do!y What makes an effective manager!

    Observations:

    1) While I was interviewing the manager, Mr.Ganpat Chaudhary, at Sindhi Society Gym Restaurant for

    my compensation project, I came to know of several facts about his management style. This middle aged

    gentleman had managed not to lose a single employee in the last 1 year and had improved the satisfaction

    level ofhis employees. When I asked him about his efficient management style, he pointed towards

    certain new practices that he had incorporated after joining the restaurant.

    He spent less time in the office and more time on the floor, interacting with

    different employees. Based on this he understood their strengths, also he emphasized on team structure.

    Through these interactions he identified the strengths ofhis employees and deployed them accordingly.

    He emphasized on strengths of employees rather than criticizing them. Terms like Boys were used for

    the employees, this motivated the employees. He also observed that they expect some returns from the

    restaurants, so food was given to them at the end of the day and employee of the month scheme was

    brought. Through these simple steps he was able to bring attrition to 0 in last year.

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    4/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    4

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    Lecture-2)Topics Covered:

    y Self Efficacyy Self Handicappingy Organization Based Self Esteem

    Observations:

    I realized that I have a lot of dimensions to myself and would neverhave realized this lest

    for the OB class. During the preparation for management, my instructor at the coaching used social

    persuasion to improve myself efficacy; this in turn helped me to finally enter into a prestigious institute.

    Also, the reflected best self exercise made me realize the fact that I have a lot of strengths and have never

    worked upon them, this is turn has made me weak as a whole as too much focus on improving my

    weakness has led me to change my personality a lot. This hampered my overall growth.

    Also, I realized the importance of inspirational speeches and could relate to the movie

    Chak De India and Miracle. Before this class I thought that these things happen in movie only, but

    looking back at my own life I have realized that these things have happened as small instances that have

    made me achieve wonders.

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    5/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    5

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    Lecture: 3Pre Readings:

    y Can you handle failuresy Abrasive Personalityy Personality & Intelligence

    Observations:

    After going through the articles I tried to apply the personality type to myself and

    realized that I am an abrasive personality type. The first personalities that come to my mind are Lee

    Iacocca in Chrysler and Steve Jobs in Apple. Also, I can link this kind of personality to another kind of

    leadership, Level 4, leadership as mentioned in the book Good To Great by Jim Collins. Below I will

    mention some of the similarities I tried to find out among the two concepts:

    Traits Steve Jobs (Apple)

    1) Extremely Intelligent

    2) He was involved in all the process of formulation of projects and even managed thelayout of initial apple stores himelf.

    3) Steve Jobs was quick to build new products like Mac computer but he did not respect

    his colleagues and as a result his team seldom had members being repeated.

    4) Jobs raised the issue of firing Scully because ofhis overwhelming competitive instinctsbut in turn got him fired.

    5) After refusal to go ahead withMac computer, Steve Jobs created an own cabin with apirate flag on it and asked for an independent division, whichhe was granted.

    Afterh

    e joined Apple again,h

    e became more matured andh

    idh

    is private life. So it is difficult to judgewhetherhe did improve himself or not and ifhe did then what were the steps involved. But it is

    interesting to see similar type of concepts arising, reading the article of Abrasive Personality I think I can

    carefully take a stand as it is a requirement for Level 4 leadership.

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    6/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    6

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    1

    References:

    1) Good To Great: Jim Collin

    2) UTV Bloomberg Documentary on Steve Jobs

    1Page:20, Good To Great. The Diagram has been adapted and theconcept of Abrasive personality has been

    added.

    Level-5:Executive

    Level-4:

    Effective Leader

    Level-3: CompetentManager

    Level-2: Contributing TeamMember

    Le

    ve

    l-1: Highly Capable

    Individual

    Abrasive Personality

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    7/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    7

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    Lecture: 4Topics Covered:

    y Transactional Analysisy Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

    Observations:

    My scores in transactional analysis were different in the test because I had undergone this

    test once. So this did not fascinate me much. The other test given to which was the MBT indicator, which

    showed our personality type. MY personality came out to be ESTJ. I observed a pattern in how the test

    emerged and tried to gauge the conclusions, some of the guys and girls were always late in outings and

    did not confirm till the last moment, these are the same people who got the personality type as perceived,

    so I realized that with these people there is not point to plan anything and that is why many a times it lead

    to conflicts because I was a Judgmental personality.

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    8/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    8

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    Lecture 5)Topics Covered:

    y Perceptiony Attribution

    Observations:

    After learning this chapter, I tried to analyze the reason for the perception of my FW guide

    Mrs. Kajli Mukherjee towards me. I tried to apply the attribution theory to gauge the reasons forher

    judgment towards me as an inefficient individual. She did not take into account whether the factors could

    be internal or external. I tried to analyze her on the basis of attribution theory:

    Distinctivness: She came late to work, responded me not to come to office and send me mails on

    Saturday and Sunday. This shows that she was very unorganized. (LOW)

    Consensus: Not everyones feedback can be taken, but Noopal Sharma who had gone to the same

    organization for the Fieldwork also reported that Ms. Mukherjee burdened her with too much work and

    did not guide much and also reprimanded her. So, I was also reacting the same way as Noopal did by

    informing my FieldWork guide about the behavior. (HIGH)

    Consistency: She did not provide any feedback on any submission to me but criticized me and did not

    give me some strong points to improve. So there was low consistency in terms of not taking me seriously

    in FW by my guide. (LOW)

    This points out that there was some external reason forher behavior and it could have been that she was

    not prepared for a FW intern and was demanding too much without a proper structure which was leading

    to a chaotic situation.

    Biases in Her Behavior

    1) Selective Perception: She was seeing my works and responsibilities only from the organization point

    of view and did not listen to my reservations and termed them as excuses.

    2) Stereotyping: She judged me on the basis of being a Fresher, without informing me as to what to do

    properly she said, I never wanted fresher as interns. So it was in a sense stereotyping that affected her

    perception about me.

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    9/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    9

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    Lecture 6)Topics Covered

    y Attitudes & Values

    During my FieldWork, I decided to apply organizational behavior in all aspects. I tried to see why my

    attitude was negative towards my guide in the organization. Applying the ABC model, I came through the

    following conclusion:

    1) Cognitive: My guide reprimanded my each and every work and pointed mistakes. These mistakes were

    trivial and no guidance was given as to how to improve the quality of the work. She emphasized more on

    copy pasting the solutions rather than spending time to actually arriving on it.

    2) Affective: I do not like my guide; my previous guide ensured that I learnt something every day.

    3) Behavioral: I made a complaint of my FW supervisor to the faculties and my enthusiasm for FW also

    died down.

    These three components collectively combined together to form a negative attitude about my Field Work

    Organization

    .

    NegativeAttitude

    Behavioral

    Affective

    Cognitive

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    10/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    10

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    Assignment Questions:

    Q-1) List three values held in high regard by your family. Are these practiced? If not, why not? What is

    the effect?

    Ans-1) The following three values are kept in high regard by my family:

    y Wearing A Sacred Thready Eating only Vegetarian Foody Marrying In The Same Caste

    1) Wearing A Sacred Thread: This value is not followed by the third generation of the family. Mainly

    because of the living style and the fast paced life in metro cities. As a result the traditions that have to be

    carried out daily have been forgotten and the culture of prayers is finished.

    2) Eating Only Vegetarian Food: This practice is still widely followed in the family.

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    11/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    11

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    3) Marrying In The Same Caste: This is a value that is more out of social pressure and due to the fear of

    being boycotted from the society. So, this value is still adopted by the generation.

    Q-2) Interview two managers in your FW organization to find out their three most important values.

    Also discuss whether their organization gives them opportunities to practice those values?

    Ans-2) Mr. Ravindra Hirejagner: The three most important values listed by Mr. Ravindra were as follows:

    y TeamWorky Transparencyy TimeManagement

    TeamWork: The team of accounts and human resource management sat on the same floor to improve

    the cross functional understanding of teams and increase cooperation among them.

    Transparency: A record of every deal with vendors is made and no gifts in any what so ever form are

    accepted to maintain the transparency in organization.

    Time Management: There is a strong focus on time management and any individual missing the

    commitmenthas to face punis

    hment for it.

    Mrs. Kajli Mukherjee: The three most important values listed by Mrs. Kajli were as follows

    y Transparencyy Qualityy Customer Focus

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    12/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    12

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    Transparency: A record of every deal with vendors is made and no gifts in any what so ever form are

    accepted to maintain the transparency in organization.

    Quality: Each and every process is properly monitored and proper audits are in place to ensure that the

    products are ofhigh quality.

    Customer Focus: The customer is always kept on high focus. This is ensured throughhigh quality

    products.

    Q-3)Interview a manager from an organization. Find out which one value, according to him, has

    helped the organization acquire its unique identity. Which two values would he like the organization to

    practice?

    Ans-3) Mr. Harendra Nath Shukla (Assistant General Manager, Grasim Industries Nagda): According to

    him, Employee Welfare has been the single most important value of Grasim Industries. Even during the

    recession of 2009, Grasim gave increment to its employees and also no Vountry Retirement Scheme hadbeen force upon employees in the past 12 years. Also, the facilities had increased and this had given

    Grasim Industries a unique identity. According to Mr. Shukla, this was one of the reasons why most of

    the people who joined the organization were people who had families and were above the age of 40. It

    had acquired the image of being a retirement heaven. Through this image Grasim is able to leverage on

    experience of individuals who join in from different places. Also, the lower rung colleges are approached

    for attracting young talent which is then groomed under the experience eyes of senior players. As a result

    of practices like these Aditya Birla Group (ABG) has been consistently in the top two employers in India

    since 2007.

  • 8/3/2019 PLJ_2011HR051

    13/13

    Personal Learning Journal: OB1

    13

    Satish Kumar Shukla- 2011HR051

    According to Mr. Shukla the organization should practice:

    1) Transparency: He saw this as the only value that Grasim should implement more. Grasim has a

    major domination of Marwari jains and baniyas and hence the promotion policies are skewed and not

    transparent. So he feels that employees could be more efficient when people are given promotion on the

    basis of a transparent process. This will ensure that at the higher echelons of the organization only able

    people are having a say.