PLEASE RSVP BY COB MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2014 Agenda.pdf · PLEASE RSVP BY COB MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2014...

PLEASE RSVP BY COB MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2014 January 2, 2014 Memorandum #2014-01 TO: HRTPO Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) BY: Chair Shepelle Watkins-White RE: CTAC Meeting, January 9, 2014 Attached is the agenda and related materials for the next meeting of the HRTPO Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) scheduled for Thursday, January 9, 2014 from 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. in the Regional Building Board Room, 723 Woodlake Drive, Chesapeake, VA. PLEASE REPLY WITH YOUR RSVP NO LATER THAN COB, MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2014. /kg Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee:

Shepelle Watkins-White, Chair (CH) Angie Bezik (VB) Don Cherry (JC) William Christopher (NO) Theresa Danaher (PO) Barry Dunn (PQ) Gregory Edwards (VB) Jay Ford (VB) Sharyn Fox (NN) Casey Funk (VB) Robbyn Gayer (NO) Richard Green (SU) Carlton Hardy (NN) Yukari Hughes (NN)

Dewey Hurley (WM) Michael Jones (IW) John Kish (CH) Henry Lewis (YK) Randy Lougee (NO) John Malbon (VB) Delceno Miles (VB) Philip Olekszyk (GL) James Openshaw (NO) Allan Parrott (VB) Teresa Schmidt (HA) Kirsten Tynch (PO) Bernie Whitlock (CH)

Copy: Dwight Farmer (HRTPO) Camelia Ravanbakht (HRTPO) Kendall Miller (HRTPO) Brian Chenault (HRTPO) Brian Miller (HRTPO) Keith Nichols (HRTPO)

Dan Bell (FHR) Eric Stringfield (VDOT) TPO Voting Members TPO Voting Alternates TPO Nonvoting Members

HRTPO Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee – January 9, 2014

AGENDA HAMPTON ROADS

CITIZEN TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 9, 2014

CALL TO ORDER 12:00 P.M.

The Regional Building Board Room 723 Woodlake Drive, Chesapeake, Virginia

1. Call to Order

2. Resolution of Condolence

3. Public Comment Period (Limit: 5 minutes per individual)

4. Submitted Public Comments

5. Approval of Agenda

6. Summary Minutes of the October 10, 2013 CTAC Meeting

7. CTAC: Current Status and Future Directions

8. MT-DT-MLK Before and After Study

9. FY 2015 Unified Planning Work Program – Planning Priorities: Draft

10. Hampton Roads Regional Safety Study 2013 Update: Part II – Crash Analysis and Countermeasures: Update

11. Hampton Roads Transportation Fund Candidate Projects: Methodology 12. Future CTAC Meeting Agenda Items

13. For Your Information 14. Old/New Business

15. Adjournment


AGENDA ITEM #1: CALL TO ORDER The meeting will be called to order by the Chair at approximately 12:00 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #2: RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE The CTAC will bestow a resolution of condolence expressing the profound sympathy of the members of the CTAC on the death of Raynor A.K. Taylor for his contributions to the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization. AGENDA ITEM #3: PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD Members of the public are invited to address the CTAC. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. AGENDA ITEM #4: SUBMITTED PUBLIC COMMENTS There are no written public comments. AGENDA ITEM #5: APPROVAL OF AGENDA Members are provided an opportunity to add or delete items from the agenda. Any item for which a member desires an action from the CTAC should be submitted at this time, as opposed to under “Old/New Business”.


AGENDA ITEM #6: SUMMARY MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 10, 2013 CTAC MEETING SUBJECT:

Summary Minutes of the October 10, 2013 CTAC meeting. BACKGROUND:

Summary Minutes of the Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee meeting held on October 10, 2013. Attachment 6 RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Approve the minutes.

HRTPO CTAC Summary Minutes – October 10, 2013 - Page 1

Summary Minutes of the HRTPO Citizen Transportation

Advisory Committee (CTAC) Meeting October 10, 2013

The HRTPO Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) Meeting was called to order at 12:02 p.m. in the Regional Building Board Room, 723 Woodlake Drive, Chesapeake, Virginia, with the following in attendance: HRTPO CTAC Members in Attendance: Shepelle Watkins-White, Chair (CH) John Kish (CH) Bernie Whitlock (CH) Teresa Schmidt (HA) Michael Jones (IW) Don Cherry (JC) Carlton Hardy (NN) Yukari Hughes (NN) Randy Lougee (NO) HRTPO CTAC Members Absent: Philip Olekszyk (GL) Sharyn Fox (NN) William Christopher (NO) Robbyn Gayer (NO) Barry Dunn (PQ)

James Openshaw (NO) Theresa Danaher (PO) Kirsten Tynch (PO) Angie Bezik (VB)* Casey Funk (VB) Delceno Miles (VB) Allan Parrott (VB) Henry Lewis (YK) Richard Green (SU) Greg Edwards (VB) Jay Ford (VB) John Malbon (VB) Dewey Hurley (WM)

HRTPO Staff: Dwight Farmer Camelia Ravanbakht Kendall Miller

Brian Chenault Brian Miller Theresa Jones

* New CTAC Member Angie Bezik (VB) will be approved by the HRTPO Board at its October 17, 2013 meeting; therefore, she is not permitted to vote until the next CTAC meeting.

Others Recorded Attending: Quan Williams (VA New Majority); Ronald Broughton (HRT TRAC) Resolution of Condolence Chair Shepelle Watkins-White recited the Resolution of Condolence that was prepared for the family of Mr. Howard Manly, an original CTAC Member. Public Comment Period There were no public comments.

Attachment 6


Submitted Public Comments There was one submitted public comment submitted by CTAC member Carlton Hardy. Ms. Kendall Miller, HRTPO Public Involvement & Title VI Administrator, noted that HRTPO staff addressed several questions raised by Mr. Hardy with the remaining transmitted to Mr. Eric Stringfield of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) who will provide a response. Mr. Hardy’s comments were also included in the October 2013 HRTPO Board Agenda. CTAC members will be receiving a copy of this agenda with highlighted action items. Approval of Agenda Chair Watkins-White asked for any additions or deletions to the agenda. Hearing none, Ms. Kirsten Tynch Moved to approve the agenda as written; seconded by Ms. Theresa Danaher. The Motion Carried. Summary Minutes of July 11, 2013 CTAC Meeting Chair Watkins-White asked for any additions or corrections to the July 11, 2013 minutes. Hearing none, Ms. Tynch Moved to approve the minutes as written; seconded by Ms. Teresa Schmidt. The Motion Carried. History of CTAC and Membership Update Dr. Camelia Ravanbakht, HRTPO Deputy Executive Director, reported that following the 2007 HRTPO Quadrennial Federal Certification Review, the Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) was established and held its first meeting on March 11, 2010. As outlined in the HRTPO CTAC Bylaws, “The mission of the Hampton Roads Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) is to provide the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO) with a citizen’s viewpoint on regional transportation issues, strategies, funding, priorities, and the decision-making process of the HRTPO.” She indicated that since its inception, the CTAC has served as a strong advocate on behalf of the citizens of Hampton Roads. Through its assistance, the citizens’ voice and viewpoint have been heard by the HRTPO leadership and decision makers through a number of initiatives. Integral to this success has been the efforts and commitment of individual members. In 2013, the HRTPO CTAC welcomed ten new members from seven Hampton Roads cities. With regret, 2013 also brought the passing of two founding CTAC members, Howard F. Manly and Raynor A.K. Taylor. She noted that in September 2013, the CTAC added Angie Bezik to its membership who will receive official HRTPO Board approval at its October 17, 2013 meeting.

Attachment 6


Public Involvement and Community Outreach Activities Ms. Kendall Miller, HRTPO Public Involvement & Title VI Administrator, stated it was an HRTPO priority to continually strengthen its Public Involvement Program by enhancing its relationship with the citizens of Hampton Roads and engaging them during and throughout the development of plans, programs, and other HRTPO initiatives. The HRTPO’s FY 2013 Public Involvement Program included a number of initiatives and activities geared toward achieving this goal, including a revamped Public Participation Plan (PPP), an enhanced Title VI/LEP Plan, the initial development of the HRTPO/Environmental Justice (EJ) Methodology Tool, and the new HRTPO website. She reported that the HRTPO must follow federal mandates that require the HRTPO to implement Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by assuring that all residents of Hampton Roads are represented fairly and not discriminated against in the transportation planning and capital investment process and assure that EJ, as outlined by the 1994 President’s Executive Order, is integrated into the HRTPO’s planning and outreach practices. In an effort to reach out and engage as many members of the EJ community as possible in the decision-making process, the HRTPO has established the Environmental Justice Roundtable. The first meeting was held on March 12, 2012 and contributed to:

• HRTPO 2012 Public Participation Plan • HRTPO 2012 Title VI and Limited English Proficiency Plan • HRTPO LRTP Community Visioning Survey

She noted the second meeting convened on September 12, 2013 with five additional meetings to be held during FY 2014. Ms. Miller reported on the HRTPO’s civic engagement and its increasing presence on Facebook and Twitter Mr. Brian Chenault, HRTPO Community Outreach Planner, reported that HRTPO staff has created a community outreach program that resulted in a number of activities and initiatives throughout FY 2013. He outlined various activities including:

• Community conversations • Presentations to Community Groups • Outreach to interested/affected parties on HRTPO special/technical reports • Participation in various local events

Attachment 6


Mr. Chenault indicated that in FY 2014, HRTPO staff will:

• Continue with its events, meetings/presentations, and special report outreach • Provide a greater social media presence • Provide community webpages • Refine current resources

Ms. Schmidt suggested notifying the respective CTAC member when an item relating to their locality is to be presented at a given CTAC meeting. Dr. Ravanbakht agreed with her recommendation. Mr. Carlton Hardy asked for the definition of Environmental Justice. Ms. Miller replied that Environmental Justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people affected by the HRTPO’s planning activities and programs. It includes, but is not limited to, people of special needs, children, the elderly, minorities, single parent households, and those with limited English proficiency. It is not an established law; however, it is in the spirit of Title VI, part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which assures that all residents are not discriminated against the implementation of any program funded by federal dollars. Mr. Hardy inquired as to whether the volunteer community was considered a part of Environmental Justice as they would be impacted by tunnel tolls. Ms. Miller replied the volunteer community was not in and of itself a part of the EJ community; however, she offered to discuss it further with him after the meeting. Mr. Henry Lewis recommended HRTPO staff publish a schedule of their public presentation itinerary. Chair Watkins-White expressed her gratitude to HRTPO staff for its increased activity in public involvement. 2040 LRTP Visioning Survey Report: Final Ms. Theresa Jones, HRTPO Transportation Engineer, reported that HRTPO staff conducted a Visioning Survey as part of the development of the Vision & Goals for the 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The survey was utilized as a tool to gather public input to assist in defining a vision for the 2040 LRTP and to help identify projects needed to improve the transportation infrastructure in Hampton Roads. The survey began on October 10, 2012 and ran through December 31, 2012. Ms. Jones stated participants were asked 20 questions to help HRTPO staff capture opinions and perspectives on transportation issues across the region with a total of 1,805 responses received and analyzed.

Attachment 6


Key findings from the Survey included:

• Top Transportation Problems in Hampton Roads: o Traffic Congestion o Poor Pavement Condition o Lack of Public Transportation

• How Should Tax Dollars be Spent in Hampton Roads:

o Light Rail o Highway Construction o Passenger Rail

She indicated a copy of the 2040 LRTP Visioning Survey Final Report may be accessed at: http://hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/TTAC090413/090413TTAC-Enclosure%2013-2040%20LRTP%20Visioning%20Survey%20Final%20Report.pdf. Ms. Yukari Hughes inquired as to whether any demographic information was collected from the survey respondents. Ms. Miller replied that this data was not gathered because a valid reason is required to attain such information. She noted that HRTPO staff overlaid demographic information with survey respondents in order to acquire a better understanding of who participated. Mr. Hardy stated the Daily Press had printed that the survey was not statistically valid and asked for clarification. Dr. Ravanbakht replied the survey was web-based and not statistically valid. Chair Watkins-White inquired as to the composition of the survey questions. Ms. Jones replied HRTPO staff used a combination of multiple choice and open ended questions. Ms. Danaher asked how the results fit into the decision making process. Dr. Ravanbakht replied the HRTPO staff updates the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) every four years and engages in numerous outreach efforts. Staff will review suggestions and many will eventually be incorporated into the candidate project list. The projects will then be evaluated and prioritized. Mr. Hardy asked whether an effort had been established to enlist the various Chambers of Commerce to incorporate HRTPO data into their respective legislative packages. Dr. Ravanbakht replied the idea had merit and was worth considering. Dr. Don Cherry asked if the news media was involved in order to promote the survey. Ms. Miller responded affirmatively, and replied that the HRTPO paid to place banner ads on the Pilot-Online, and several news articles were written as a courtesy to the HRTPO. Ms. Delceno Miles commented that the survey was an excellent baseline. She suggested having a greater presence in social media to engage today’s youth.

Attachment 6

http://hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/TTAC090413/090413TTAC-Enclosure%2013-2040%20LRTP%20Visioning%20Survey%20Final%20Report.pdf

http://hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/TTAC090413/090413TTAC-Enclosure%2013-2040%20LRTP%20Visioning%20Survey%20Final%20Report.pdf


HB2313 HRTF Revenues: Resolution Dr. Camelia Ravanbakht, HRTPO Deputy Executive Director, reported that in recent HRTPO Board meetings, the Board was briefed on programming options that would maximize the “regional” component of the HB2313 transportation revenues. The legislation dedicates two revenue streams to the Hampton Roads Transportation Fund (HRTF) and prescribes the HRTPO to have full purview and discretion on how and when to spend these dollars. Beginning in FY 2014, HRTF funding will be approximately $179 million, growing to $234 million in FY 2019, generating approximately $5.5 billion over the next twenty years for regional transportation projects that provide the greatest impact on reducing congestion as prescribed in HB2313. During the July 18, 2013 meeting, members of the Hampton Roads General Assembly Delegation specified the intent was that the HRTF revenues prescribed in the HB2313 legislation would be used, in the most effective manner possible, to fund transportation projects that provide the greatest impact on reducing congestion. They also clarified it was not their intent that the HRTF be used to fund projects in every locality within Planning District 23, but rather to fund projects that are significant to the region as a whole. She stated the purpose of HRTPO Resolution 2013-06, approved by the Board on September 19, 2013, was to confirm the intent of the HRTPO Board regarding the use of HRTF revenues. In a related matter, HRTPO staff is currently developing a list of HRTF candidate projects for the HRTPO Board to consider at its meeting on October 17, 2013. Chair Watkins-White asked whether the HRTPO Board would take action on the HRTF candidate projects at the October meeting. Mr. Dwight Farmer, HRTPO Executive Director, replied affirmatively, and stated the HRTPO Board will be requested to support the package of projects and initiate dialogue with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to work through the details regarding funding and construction. He noted the HRTPO Board will be informed that the package does not preclude bonding or Public-Private Partnerships (P3s), and indicated it will be a long and complex process. Chair Watkins-White suggested the CTAC members consider submitting written comments or attending the HRTPO Board meeting on October 17, 2013. Chair Watkins-White stated that previous prioritization work assisted in establishing the groundwork in terms of HRTF priorities and requested an update for the January CTAC meeting. Future CTAC Meeting Agenda Items Chair Watkins-White highlighted the agenda items for the next CTAC meeting.

Attachment 6


For Your Information Chair Watkins-White noted the items in the For Your Information section of the agenda packet. Old/New Business Ms. Danaher asked whether HRTPO staff had any details regarding a comment that was made at a recent Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) meeting that prompted a letter by Mayor William Sessoms of Virginia Beach. Ms. Miller asked Ms. Danaher for the website that contained the information. Ms. Danaher noted she was unable to locate any specific details on the CTB’s website. Dr. Ravanbakht stated it was her understanding that the letter was in response to a CTB meeting that took place several months ago. Ms. Miles inquired as to the status of creating an Urban Crescent outreach effort. Mr. Farmer replied the Urban Crescent had accomplished its mission. Ms. Angie Bezik asked whether it was worthwhile to maintain the Urban Crescent relationships. Mr. Farmer replied affirmatively. Adjournment

With no further business to come before the Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee, the meeting adjourned at 1:40 p.m.

Attachment 6


AGENDA ITEM #7: CTAC: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS SUBJECT:

A discussion of the current status of CTAC and its membership and possible future directions. BACKGROUND:

The HRTPO CTAC was created in 2009 to represent the public’s interest in committee form. Since its inception, the CTAC has provided the HRTPO with invaluable perspective on the transportation issues facing the Hampton Roads region. Fiscal Year 2013 was one in which 10 new CTAC members were added and old CTAC members’ terms came to a close. Given recent questions posed by some members of the CTAC regarding the CTAC’s role within the transportation planning process at the HRTPO, staff recommends the initiation of a dialogue regarding the CTAC’s direction for Fiscal Year 2014 and beyond. Ms. Kendall Miller, Administrator of Public Involvement and Title VI, will brief CTAC on this item. Attachment 7 RECOMMENDED ACTION:

For discussion and informational purposes.

Bylaws of the HRTPO Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee | Page 1

Bylaws of the HRTPO

Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee Approved: June 16, 2010 Amended: March 21, 2013 ARTICLE I. PREAMBLE The Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) serves as an advisory committee to the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (TPO). The mission of the Hampton Roads Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) is to provide the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO) with a citizen’s viewpoint on regional transportation issues, strategies, funding, priorities, and the decision-making process of the HRTPO. The CTAC will serve as a strong advocate on behalf of citizens by listening to their viewpoints and helping to have their voices heard by the HRTPO leadership and decision makers. The CTAC Chair, as a nonvoting member of the HRTPO Board, will have the responsibility of communicating the work of the CTAC back to the HRTPO Board. In the event of any conflict between these bylaws and those of the TPO, the TPO bylaws shall prevail.

ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) – The advisory committee appointed by the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) to serve in an advisory capacity to the TPO. The CTAC’s purpose is to provide public input to the TPO Board on transportation issues. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) – The MPO for the Hampton Roads MPA. Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) – The geographical area determined by agreement between the MPO for the area and the Governor and in which the metropolitan transportation planning and programming process is carried out. Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) – The policy board of an organization created and designated to carry out the metropolitan transportation planning and programming process. The Hampton Roads TPO is the MPO for the Hampton Roads MPA. Metropolitan Planning Agreement – A written agreement among the MPO, State, and public transportation operators serving the MPA that identifies the mutual responsibilities of those entities in carrying out the metropolitan transportation planning and programming process. Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Programming Process – The federally-mandated continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning and programming process that results in plans and programs that consider all surface transportation modes and supports metropolitan community goals.

Attachment 7


Planning District Commission (PDC) – A political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia chartered under the Regional Cooperation Act by the local governments of each planning district. The purpose of PDCs is to encourage and facilitate local government cooperation and state-local cooperation in addressing regional problems of greater than local significance. Transportation Management Area (TMA) – An urbanized area with a population over 200,000, as defined by the Bureau of the Census and designated by the U.S. Secretary of Transportation, or any additional area where TMA designation is requested by the Governor and the MPO and designated by the U.S. Secretary of Transportation. Urbanized Area (UZA) – A geographical area with a population of 50,000 or more, as designated by the Bureau of the Census. Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) – A statement of work identifying the planning priorities and activities to be carried out within the metropolitan planning area. A UPWP includes a description of the planning work and resulting products, and specifies who will perform the work, time frames for completing the work, and the source(s) of funds.

ARTICLE III. MEMBERSHIP 3.01 General. The CTAC shall consist of up to thirty (30) members, each of whom shall be a resident of a TPO-member locality. The TPO member localities are: the Cities of Chesapeake, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Poquoson, Portsmouth, Suffolk, Virginia Beach, and Williamsburg, as well as the Counties of Gloucester, Isle of Wight, James City, and York. Members shall be appointed by the TPO Board based on recommendations from the TPO Nominating Committee. 3.02. Terms. Initial terms shall be staggered: one-third of the members shall be appointed for one-year terms; one-third of the members shall be appointed for two-year terms; and one-third shall be appointed for three-year terms. In the event that an appointed member does not complete his or her term, then the TPO Nominating Committee shall recommend a replacement for appointment by the TPO Board to serve the unexpired portion of the term. No member shall serve more than two successive terms (even if one of the terms was for less than three years).

ARTICLE IV. VOTING 4.01 General. A motion that has been made and seconded may be approved by a majority vote of the members present, provided, however, that a quorum of a majority of the appointed members is present for the vote. If a quorum is not present, then the vote must be delayed until such time as a quorum is present, or the vote may be held at a subsequent meeting at which a quorum is present. 4.02 Reconsideration. Any member who voted on the prevailing side may make a motion for reconsideration at the meeting during which the vote was taken. Alternatively, such a member may make a motion to reconsider at the next regularly scheduled meeting, but only if the member informed the Chair and the Executive Director, in writing, within three business days of the publication of the minutes, of the member’s intention to make the motion to reconsider. The Executive Director shall provide a copy of any such written notice to all CTAC members. A motion to reconsider cannot be renewed if it has been voted on and defeated, except by unanimous consent of those present at the meeting.

Attachment 7


ARTICLE V. MEETINGS 5.01 Regular Meetings. Regular meetings of the CTAC shall be held quarterly, at 12:00 p.m. on the second Thursday of January, April, July and October of each year. Meetings shall be held in the Regional Building in Chesapeake. The CTAC may change the date, time or location of any regular meeting at any prior meeting and may adjourn any meeting from time-to-time. 5.02 Special Meetings. Special meetings of the CTAC may be called by the Chair at the Chair’s discretion upon five (5) business days’ notice to all members, of the time, place and purpose of the special meeting. In accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, public notice of special meetings shall be given contemporaneously with the notice provided to CTAC members (ref.: Va. Code § 2.2-3707). The contents of the notice and the locations for notice placement shall be as set forth below in subsection 5.04. 5.03 Quorum. A majority of the appointed members of the CTAC shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. 5.04 Notices. Public notice of each regular CTAC or subcommittee meeting shall be given not less than three (3) business days prior to the date of such meeting, in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (ref.: Va. Code § 2.2-3707). Such notice shall provide the date, time, and location of the meeting and shall be posted in both the reception area of the Regional Building in Chesapeake and the administrative offices of the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission. Notice also shall be posted on the TPO Web site and, if feasible, in TPO newsletters. Staff is also charged on an on-going basis with improving and further disseminating notice of meetings in order to encourage and facilitate public participation. 5.05 Meetings Open to the Public. In accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (the “Act”), all meetings of the CTAC or any subcommittees established by the CTAC shall be open to the public unless lawfully convened into a closed session in accordance with the Act (ref.: Va. Code §§ 2.2-3707 and 2.2-3712). No meeting during which CTAC or TPO business is discussed shall be conducted through telephonic or electronic means where the members are not physically assembled. In accordance with the Act, a “meeting” is any gathering of three or more members of the CTAC or any CTAC-appointed subcommittee (unless the subcommittee has only three members, in which case the gathering of two members shall constitute a “meeting”) (ref.: Va. Code § 2.2-3701). 5.06 Public Comment. Time shall be allotted for public comment regarding transportation issues at CTAC meetings. Any person desiring to address the CTAC shall register with the staff of the TPO Executive Director prior to the opening of the meeting. The time limit for speakers is five (5) minutes per person. The Executive Director of the TPO shall assign a staff member to keep time for each speaker. Time cannot be pooled or assigned to any person other than the person who registered to speak. A member of the public may submit written comments or other materials to the Executive Director for distribution to the CTAC. 5.07 Minutes and Materials Furnished to Members. Minutes shall be recorded at all open meetings, and at least one copy of all agenda packets and all materials furnished to members of the CTAC shall be made available for public inspection at the same time such documents are furnished to members of the CTAC, and, when feasible, shall be posted on the TPO Web site prior to the meeting (ref.: Va. Code § 2.2-3707). Minutes shall include a record of any votes taken.

Attachment 7


ARTICLE VI. OFFICERS AND DUTIES 6.01 Officers. The officers of the CTAC shall consist of a Chair and Vice-Chair. 6.02 Chair. The TPO Chair shall appoint one of the members of the CTAC as Chair of the CTAC for a three-year term. The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the CTAC at which the Chair is present, and shall vote as any other CTAC member. The Chair shall have all of the powers and duties customarily pertaining to the office of Chair and shall sign official documents of the CTAC and perform such further duties as may be assigned to the Chair by the TPO Board. 6.03 Vice-Chair. The Vice-Chair shall be a CTAC member and, in the event of the absence of the Chair, or of the Chair’s inability to perform any of the duties of the office of the Chair or to exercise any of the Chair’s powers, shall perform such duties and possess such powers as are conferred upon the Chair until such time as the Chair’s inability to perform has ceased or a new Chair is appointed by the TPO Chair. The Vice-Chair shall perform such other duties as may from time-to-time be assigned to the Vice-Chair by the CTAC Chair, the TPO Chair, or the TPO Board. The Vice-Chair shall be elected by the CTAC members, and the Vice-Chair’s term of office shall coincide with that of the current Chair, provided the Vice-Chair’s term shall end notwithstanding the foregoing on the expiration of the Vice-Chair’s term as a member of the CTAC.

ARTICLE VII. SUBCOMMITTEES 7.01 Subcommittees. The CTAC Chair may create standing or ad hoc subcommittees from time to time as circumstances warrant. Only CTAC members may serve on subcommittees, and the CTAC Chair shall appoint the members who serve on the subcommittees. 7.02 Subcommittee Meetings. The meetings of any standing or ad hoc subcommittee shall be open to the public as described in subsection 5.05, and public notice of such meetings shall be provided as described in subsection 5.04.

ARTICLE VIII. STAFF 8.01 Executive Director/Secretary. The Executive Director of the TPO shall provide staff support to the CTAC and shall plan, organize and direct the activities of the staff in support of the mission and the directions of the TPO Board. As needed, the Executive Director/Secretary shall work in coordination with the CTAC Chair to prepare the agendas for CTAC meetings.

Attachment 7


ARTICLE IX. PROCEDURES 9.01 Parliamentary Procedure. Except as otherwise provided in these rules, the most recent edition of Roberts – Rules of Order, shall be used to conduct all meetings of the TPO and its subcommittees. 9.02 Governmental Agency and Public Body. The CTAC is an “advisory agency,” as that term is used in the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, and it is a “public body,” as that term is used in both the Virginia Freedom of Information Act and the Virginia Public Procurement Act (ref.: Va. Code §§ 2.2-3101, -3701, and -4301). Accordingly, CTAC members shall be subject to the state laws and regulations that govern governmental advisory agencies and public bodies in Virginia, including the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, and the Virginia Public Procurement Act, except where specifically exempted by act of the General Assembly.

ARTICLE X. SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS Any CTAC member may propose amendments to these bylaws by placing such proposed amendments in writing before the CTAC at a CTAC meeting. No vote shall be taken on the proposed amendments until the meeting that follows the meeting at which the written amendments were provided to the CTAC. The public shall be provided access to inspect the proposed amendments. Approval of amendments shall require an affirmative vote of 2/3 of the members appointed to the CTAC, as well approval by the TPO Board prior to effective date thereof.

ARTICLE XI. EFFECTIVE DATE The foregoing bylaws of the HRTPO Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee were adopted by a duly constituted meeting of the HRTPO Board on June 16, 2010, and amended by the HRTPO Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee at its duly constituted meeting on March 13, 2013, following approval by the HRTPO Board at a duly constituted meeting on March 21, 2013.

Attachment 7


AMENDMENTS TO THE BYLAWS OF THE CITIZEN TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE

HRTPO Board and Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee Actions – March 13 and March 21, 2013. Before Amendment: Regular meetings of the CTAC shall be held at 5:00 p.m. on the second Thursday of January, March, May, July, September, and November of each year at a place to be determined by the CTAC Chair. After Amendment: Regular meetings of the CTAC shall be held quarterly, at 12:00 p.m. on the second Thursday of January, April, July and October of each year. Meetings shall be held in the Regional Building in Chesapeake

Attachment 7


AGENDA ITEM #8: MT-DT-MLK BEFORE AND AFTER STUDY SUBJECT:

A briefing on the HRTPO MT-DT-MLK Before and After Study. BACKGROUND:

The HRTPO staff is currently working on the MT-DT-MLK Before and After Study, which contains two parts: Part A - HRTPO staff Before and After Traffic Analysis Study The HRTPO staff plans on completing a before and after study in FY 2015 to determine traffic impacts resulting from tolling the Midtown Tunnel and Downtown Tunnel (expected to begin February 1, 2014). In preparation, HRTPO staff has collected numerous photos/videos as well as peak hour travel time runs (Fall 2012 and Fall 2013) to document “before” travel conditions for existing traffic queues and congestion at key locations – Midtown Tunnel, Downtown Tunnel and I-64/High Rise Bridge. Staff plans on collecting similar data to document “after” travel conditions at the same locations in FY 2015. In addition, staff plans on assisting local jurisdictions re-time traffic signals along key corridors that are anticipated to be impacted by the tolls. Part B – Commuter Toll Pattern Before and After Survey

Tolling begins at both the Midtown and Downtown Tunnels, on February 1, 2014. The tolls for these tunnels will be collected using the E-ZPass system, without traditional toll booths. HRTPO staff is currently working with Christopher Newport University (CNU) to develop a scope of work to conduct a two-part Commuter Toll Pattern Survey in order to assess motorists’ familiarity with the toll and their anticipated behavior in response to the initiation of tolls on February 1, 2014. This first part of the survey would be conducted prior to the initiation of tolls on February 1, 2014. The second part of the survey would focus on motorists’ actual commuting behaviors and response after the tolls have commenced. The results of this survey will provide a baseline of commuter behavior in response to tolling in Hampton Roads. At the January 16, 2014 HRTPO Board meeting, HRTPO staff will recommend the HRTPO Board approve the Cooperative Service Agreement with CNU to conduct the Commuter Toll Pattern Survey. Mr. Dwight Farmer, Executive Director, will brief CTAC on this item. RECOMMENDED ACTION:



AGENDA ITEM #9: FY 2015 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM – PLANNING PRIORITIES: DRAFT SUBJECT:

Establishing regional planning priorities for the next UPWP is planned. BACKGROUND:

In addition to detailing the work associated with HRTPO core functions – the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the Congestion Management Process (CMP), and Public Participation – federal regulations state that the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) shall include a discussion of the planning priorities facing the Metropolitan Planning Aarea (MPA). It is in the determination of these planning priorities that the HRTPO Board ensures its vision and goals are carried forward in the UPWP. The regional planning priorities in the current (FY 2014) UPWP are:

• Transportation Programming • Evaluation of Funding Alternatives • Multimodal Planning

Potential planning priorities for consideration for the FY 2015 UPWP are included in the attachment. Dr. Camelia Ravanbakht, HRTPO Deputy Executive Director, will brief CTAC on this item. Attachment 9 RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Review the attached planning priorities and submit comments to Mike Kimbrel [email protected], by COB on Wednesday January 22, 2014.

mailto:[email protected]

Planning Priorities for Hampton Roads In addition to detailing the work associated with HRTPO core functions – the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the Congestion Management Process (CMP), and Public Participation – federal regulations state that the UPWP for MPOs designated as Transportation Management Areas (TMA) shall include a discussion of the planning priorities of the metropolitan planning area. It is in the determination of these planning priorities that the HRTPO Board ensures its vision and goals are carried forward in the UPWP. Establishing clear direction from the HRTPO Board regarding its priorities allows HRTPO staff to ensure that limited resources (manpower, funding) are properly allocated in the UPWP. The FY 2015 planning priorities for the Hampton Roads TMA are as follows: Transportation Programming Transportation programming involves tracking transportation funds coming to Hampton Roads, selecting projects on which to allocate those funds, and monitoring the status of projects to help ensure transportation dollars are being used efficiently and effectively. HRTPO transportation programming efforts include:

Striving for equity in statewide discretionary transportation funding. Encouraging further integration of MPOs early in the development of the Virginia Six-

Year Improvement Program. Continuing the use of HRTPO project prioritization methodologies to ensure

transportation funds are allocated to projects with the highest impact on congestion relief, safety, and economic vitality.

Continuing to improve the transparency, accuracy, and user-friendliness of the HRTPO TIP.

Continuing the use of performance monitoring – including quarterly reviews of the progress on TIP projects to help ensure that funds are being used effectively.

Attending meetings of the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB). Continuing to improve the region’s’ potential to receive additional federal funding.

In February 2013, the General Assembly approved the first comprehensive overhaul of the way Virginia pays for its transportation system since 1986. The new transportation funding legislation (HB2313) is expected to generate hundreds of millions in new transportation dollars annually statewide and includes regional components that will raise significant new funding each year to be used specifically in Hampton Roads. These new regional transportation revenues will be placed in the Hampton Roads Transportation Fund (HRTF) and, in accordance with the new law, HRTF revenues shall be used solely for new construction projects on new or existing roads, bridges and tunnels as approved by the HRTPO Board. HRTPO efforts related to the HRTF include:

Monitoring monthly income, interest earnings, and expenditures associated with the HRTF.

Assisting the HRTPO Board in the selection of HRTF projects. Monitoring the status of HRTF projects to help ensure effective use of the funds.

DRAFT

Attachment 9

Efficient, User-Focused Investments Even with the new funding provided by HB2313, there will not be enough money to address all the transportation needs in Hampton Roads. It will remain vitally important to invest in transportation projects that provide the best return on investment with respect to congestion relief, safety, and economic vitality. All users of the transportation system – motorist, bicyclist, transit rider, freight hauler – are directly impacted by traffic congestion and safety. Even one who never leaves home is affected by problems in the transportation system because such problems impact the delivery of all goods and services, including emergency services. HRTPO efforts related to ensuring efficient, user-focused transportation investments include:

Continuing the use of HRTPO project prioritization methodologies, which take into account congestion relief, safety, and economic vitality.

Evaluating performance pricing strategies for reducing congestion. Encouraging the implementation of projects known to be particularly cost-effective at

reducing congestion and improving safety, such as the synchronization of traffic signals. Encouraging strategies for clearing crashes and incidents faster. Evaluating operational solutions, including advanced-technologies.

Strengthening Multimodal Planning Federal regulations require that metropolitan transportation planning include both long-range and short-range strategies and/or actions that lead to the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods. Multimodal refers to the variety of available transportation options – highways, transit, freight and passenger rail, waterways, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, etc. – and how those modes are interconnected. Although the HRTPO transportation planning process has long taken into account the various modes of transportation, the HRTPO will strive to strengthen its multimodal planning by:

Continuing freight planning activities – including the findings of a number of HRTPO freight-related studies – to promote safe, secure, fast, and efficient movement of goods.

Continuing strong support of improvements to transit and passenger rail service. Better integrating public transit planning in the next LRTP. Developing an Active Transportation Plan (Bicycle and Pedestrian).

DRAFT

Attachment 9


AGENDA ITEM #10: HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL SAFETY STUDY 2013 UPDATE: PART II – CRASH ANALYSIS AND COUNTERMEASURES: UPDATE

SUBJECT:

HRTPO staff is currently producing Part II of the Hampton Roads Regional Safety Study 2013 Update, which is being prepared using new tools and methods to develop recommendations for improving roadway safety. BACKGROUND:

The Hampton Roads Regional Safety Study, a comprehensive analysis of highway safety throughout the region, was initiated in 2001. HRTPO staff is currently producing the first full update to the original Regional Safety Study. Part I of the Hampton Roads Regional Safety Study 2013 Update reviewed previous HRTPO safety planning efforts, reported the recent trends in roadway safety in Hampton Roads, detailed the characteristics of crashes in Hampton Roads, and specified the number and rate of crashes for each mile of freeway and approximately 600 of the busiest intersections throughout the region. Part II of the Regional Safety Study 2013 Update builds on the results of Part I by using its results to develop ways to improve roadway safety. Sections in Part II will include Efforts to Improve Roadway Safety, Potential for Safety Improvements, General Crash Countermeasures, Countermeasures for High Crash Locations, and Next Steps. This update is being developed using new tools and methods to analyze roadway safety from the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Highway Safety Manual and from the Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research (VCTIR). These organizations produced analytical tools to help determine those locations with the greatest potential for safety improvements. Mr. Keith Nichols, Senior Transportation Engineer, will brief the CTAC on this item.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:



AGENDA ITEM #11: HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION FUND (HRTF) CANDIDATE PROJECTS: METHODOLOGY

SUBJECT:

An update on the methodology used to develop the HRTF Candidate Projects list, including the role of the HRTPO Project Prioritization Tool. BACKGROUND:

During the September 19, 2013 meeting, the HRTPO Board approved a resolution confirming the intent of the Board to use HRTF revenues in the most effective manner possible to fund transportation projects that are significant to the region as a whole and provide the greatest impact on reducing congestion. In addition, the Board directed HRTPO staff to develop a list of HRTF candidate projects for consideration during the October Board meeting. Among the criteria used to determine a project’s eligibility to be included in the HRTF Candidate Projects List was the inclusion of a project in the HRTPO Board approved 2034 Long-Range Transportation Plan. Projects included in the 2034 LRTP underwent a prioritization process whereby they were evaluated, scored, and ranked based on three components: Project Utility, Project Vitality, and Economic Vitality. Projects were also considered for inclusion in the HRTF Candidate Projects list if they met one or more of the following:

• Be supported by HRTPO Resolutions • Be legally eligible • Meet regional project cost threshold of $100 million

During its October 17, 2013 meeting, the HRTPO Board, by way of resolution, formally supported the HRTF candidate projects in order to facilitate coordination and discussions with VDOT and FHWA to refine cost estimates and evaluate financing options and methods of project delivery. Dr. Camelia Ravanbakht, HRTPO Deputy Executive Director, will brief the CTAC on this item. Attachment 11-A: Hampton Roads Transportation Project Priorities

(HRTPO – March 2013) Attachment 11-B: HRTF Project Methodology and Map Attachment 11-C: HRTPO Resolution 2013-09 RECOMMENDED ACTION:


Hampton Roads Transportation Project Priorities

Prepared by HRTPO Staff

Revised March 21, 2013

Attachment 11-A

2034 LRTP Regionally Funded Construction Projects

1

Priori za on Category

Roadway Systems include Interstate, Primary, Urban. Funding is allocated according to roadway system.

Locality Rank in

Roadway System

Priori za on Scores

2034 LRTP Project Cost (in Millions)

Bridge & Tunnel

Projects

Primary Roadway System

Downtown Tunnel/ Midtown Tunnel/MLK Extension (Hampton Blvd to I‐264)

Norfolk/Portsmouth

1 242 $2,100.0

Dominion Blvd (0.05 mi N. of Great Bridge Blvd to 0.75 mi. S. of Cedar Road)

Chesapeake 2 221 $426.0

Urban Roadway System

Lesner Bridge (E. Stra ord Rd to Page Ave) Virginia Beach 1 173 $89.00

Highway Projects

Interstate Roadway System

I‐64 Peninsula Widening (Jefferson Ave (exit 255) to Ft Eus s Blvd (exit 250))

Newport News

1 178 $260.1

Primary Roadway System

Route 17 (George Washington Memorial Hwy) (1.27 mi S. of Lakeside Dr. (Hampton Hwy) to 1.52 mi N. of Lakeside Dr (Dare Rd))

York County 1 202 $32.7

Route 460 (Hampton Roads por on) (Bowers Hill to Zuni)

Suffolk/Isle of Wight

2 187 $1,3961

Route 17 (George Washington Memorial Hwy) (1.52 mi N. of Lakeside Dr (Dare Rd) to Denbigh Blvd)

York County 4 146 $8.0


Lynnhaven Pkwy (Indian River Rd to Centerville Tnpk) Virginia Beach 1 191 $20.4

Route 58 (Holland Rd) (Suffolk Bypass to 0.7 mi. W. Manning Bridge Rd)

Suffolk 2 180 $75.0

Military Hwy at Northampton Blvd Con nuous Flow Interchange

Norfolk 6 157 $49.8

Holland Rd (Nimmo Pkwy to Dam Neck Rd) Virginia Beach 10 141 $25.9

Witchduck Rd (I‐264 to Virginia Beach Blvd) Virginia Beach 11 141 $32.1

Laskin Rd (Republic Rd to Oriole Dr) Virginia Beach 21 114 $66.5

Indian River Rd (Lynnhaven Pkwy to Elbow Rd) Virginia Beach 23 109 $73.4

Atkinson Blvd (Jefferson Ave to Warwick Blvd) Newport

News 24 107 $10.0

Laskin Rd (Oriole Dr to 30th/31st St) Virginia Beach 31 100 $23.1

Elbow Rd/Dam Neck Rd (Indian River Rd to VA Beach Amphitheater)

Virginia Beach 35 98 $49.4

Intermodal Projects


Craney Island Connector (VA‐164 to Craney Island Marine Terminal (Future))

Portsmouth 1 189 $436.0

Transit WATA Administra ve Opera ons Center James City

County N/A N/A $9.0

Passenger Rail

Newport News Mul modal High‐Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Sta ons Development

Newport News

N/A N/A $20.0

N/A ‐ Not evaluated in Priori za on Analysis 1 Updated project cost for the en re Route 460 corridor from Suffolk Bypass to I‐295 in Prince George County/Petersburg. Source: Office of Transporta on Public‐Private Partnerships, VDOT, December 2012

Attachment 11-A

2

2034 LRTP Locally Funded Construction Projects



Locality Rank in

Roadway System

Priori za on Scores


Bridge & Tunnel

Projects


Mills Godwin Bridge (Bridge Road) Suffolk 3 150 $60.0

High Street (Churchland Bridge) Portsmouth 6 132 $23.0

Highway Projects


Seaboard Rd (Princess Anne to Nimmo Pkwy) Virginia Beach 7 155 $8.7

Bridge Road (Godwin Br to Chesapeake City Line) Suffolk 8 154 $90.0

Dam Neck Rd (Holland Rd to Drakesmile Rd) Virginia Beach 19 114 $34.8

Holland Rd (Rosemont Rd to Independence Blvd) Virginia Beach 20 114 $56.5

Dam Neck Rd (Drakesmile Rd to London Bridge Rd) Virginia Beach 22 109 $48.9

Indian River Rd (Centerville Tnpk to Ferrell Pkwy) Virginia Beach 26 104 $74.2

First Colonial Rd (Old Dona on Pkwy to Virginia Beach Virginia Beach 28 103 $51.0

Newtown Rd (Baker Rd to Virginia Beach Blvd) Virginia Beach 32 100 $23.5

West Neck Pkwy Ext'd (Elbow Rd to N. Landing Rd) Virginia Beach 36 98 $49.1

Centerville Tnpk (Indian River Rd to Kempsville Rd) Virginia Beach 39 97 $44.2

Rosemont Rd (Virginia Beach Blvd to Holland Rd) Virginia Beach 40 96 $86.9

Providence Rd (Kempsville Rd to Princess Anne Rd) Virginia Beach 44 92 $63.8

Centerville Tnpk (Kempsville Rd to Chesapeake CL) Virginia Beach 45 90 $28.6

General Booth Blvd (Oceana Blvd to Dam Neck Rd) Virginia Beach 52 86 $37.4

Ferrell Pkwy (Indian River Rd to Indian Lakes Blvd) Virginia Beach 57 82 $33.2

Lynnhaven Pkwy (Holland Rd to Princess Anne Rd) Virginia Beach 59 82 $92.7

Ferrell Pkwy (Indian Lakes to Pleasant Valley Rd) Virginia Beach 60 81 $42.3

Nimmo Pkwy (Indian River Rd & N. Landing Rd to West Neck Pkwy Ext'd)

Virginia Beach 63 74 $41.1

Princess Anne Rd (Upton Dr to General Booth Blvd) Virginia Beach 67 70 $22.9

London Bridge Rd (Dam Neck Rd to Shipps Corner Rd) Virginia Beach 76 66 $40.8

Birdneck Rd (I‐264 to Virginia Beach Blvd) Virginia Beach 85 59 $21.1

Cleveland St (Witchduck Rd to Clearfield Ave) Virginia Beach 86 59 $13.6

Kempsville Rd Intersec on at Indian River Rd Virginia Beach N/A N/A $11.6

First Colonial Rd Intersec on at Virginia Beach Blvd Virginia Beach N/A N/A $28.2

Shore Dr (Marlin Bay Dr to E. Stra ord Rd (bridge Virginia Beach N/A N/A $14.8

Shore Dr (Page Ave to Great Neck Rd) Virginia Beach N/A N/A $12.9

Shore Dr (Pleasure House Rd to Treasure Island Dr) Virginia Beach N/A N/A $18.4

Passenger Rail

Harbor Park Mul modal High‐Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Sta on Development

Norfolk N/A N/A $6.0

N/A ‐ Not evaluated in Priori za on Analysis Attachment 11-A

2034 LRTP Ongoing Transportation Studies

Note: List of studies not in a prioritized order

Unfunded Projects for Future Consideration

3



Locality Rank in

Roadway System

Priori za on Score


Highway Projects


I‐64 (Ft Eus s Blvd to Route 199/exit 242)

Newport News/ James City County/York

County

1 178 $7791

Interstate Interchange System

I‐64/I‐264 Interchange (including Witchduck Interchange)

Norfolk/ Virginia Beach

3 192 $270

I‐64 Interchange Improvement at Ft Eus s Blvd1 Newport News 8 149 $134

Bridge & Tunnel

Projects


I‐64 Southside Widening (I‐64/I‐464 to I‐64/I‐664 at Bowers Hill)

Chesapeake 8 160 $1,0802

1 Updated cost es mate for the en re project corridor from I‐664 in Hampton Roads to I‐95 in Richmond is $4,700 Million ‐ $7,300 Million. Source: VDOT Dra EIS, October 2012 2 Updated planning level cost es mate for the en re I‐64 corridor from I‐464 interchange to I‐664/I‐264 at Bowers Hill is $870 Million. The cost es mate includes $500 Million to replace the High Rise Bridge; It does not include the interchange work at I‐464 or Bowers Hill. Source: VDOT, October 2012

Patriots Crossing

I‐64 Peninsula Corridor

Hampton Roads Bridge‐Tunnel

Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt

High‐Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail

Route 60 Reloca on

Virginia Beach Transit Extension

Skiffes Creek Connector

Croaker Road

Air Terminal Interchange

Longhill Road

I‐64 Southside Widening (including High‐Rise Bridge replacement)

Attachment 11-A

4

"/

"/

!.

"/

p£

!.

!.

p¤

p¤

p¤

"/

"/

§̈¦64

§̈¦564

§̈¦264

§̈¦464

§̈¦64

§̈¦264

§̈¦664

tu60

tu460

tu17

tu58

tu58tu460

OP168

OP199

tu13

S u f f o l kS u f f o l k

C h e s a p e a k eC h e s a p e a k e

V i r g i n i a B e a c hV i r g i n i a B e a c h

I s l e O f W i g h t C o u n t yI s l e O f W i g h t C o u n t y

J a m e s C i t y C o u n t yJ a m e s C i t y C o u n t y

N o r f o l kN o r f o l k

H a m p t o nH a m p t o n

Y o r k C o u n t yY o r k C o u n t y

N e w p o r t N e w sN e w p o r t N e w s

P o r t s m o u t hP o r t s m o u t h

P o q u o s o nP o q u o s o n

W i l l i a m s b u r gW i l l i a m s b u r g

tu13

¬«258

¬«10

Prepared by HRTPO Staff

To Richmond/I-295

To Petersburg/I-295

G l o u c e s t e r C o u n t yG l o u c e s t e r C o u n t y

Hampton Roads Transportation Project Priorities

0 3 61.5Miles

FundedOngoing Studies

"/ Interchange Studies

Roadway Studies

Multimodal Studies

FundedProjects for Construction

!. Planned Intersection Projects

p¤ Planned HSIPR Stations

p£ Planned Transit O&M Center

Planned Roadway Projects

Committed Roadway Projects

Committed Rail Projects

"/ Committed Interchange Projects

!. Committed Intersection Projects

Unfunded Projects forFuture Consideration

"/ Interchanges for Consideration

Roadway Projects for Consideration

Note: The alignment of any project is not set until the final design is completed.

Transportation Projects included in the 2034 Fiscally‐Constrained LRTP

Attachment 11-A

5

2034 Vision Plan

Unfunded Projects

Attachment 11-A

6

2034 Vision Plan—Unfunded Highway Projects

Southeastern Parkway I‐264 Chesapeake Expy Multi 180 $2,500

I‐64 Peninsula Widening Route 199 (Exit 242) Fort Eustis Blvd (Exit 250) Multi 178 $7791

Route 60 Relocated Newport News CL Blow Flats Rd JCC 140 $34

Route 60 Relocated Fort Eustis Blvd James City CL NN 135 $29

Mt. Pleasant Road,

Phase 1Chesapeake Expy Etheridge Rd CHE 134 $26

Cedar Road Albermarle Dr Battlefield Blvd CHE 121 $10

I‐64 North Peninsula

WideningRoute 199 (Exit 242) New Kent County Line Multi 119 $1,098

2

J. Clyde Morris Blvd

(Route 17)I‐64 York CL NN 114 $48

Route 17 (G.W.

Memorial Highway)Newport News CL

Route 171 (Victory

Boulevard)YORK 109 $15

Route 17 (G.W.

Memorial Highway)

Route 173 (Denbigh

Boulevard)

Route 105 (Fort Eustis

Boulevard)YORK 109 $17

Route 17 (G.W.

Memorial Highway)

Route 171 (Victory

Boulevard)Hampton Highway YORK 108 $12

Route 17 (G.W.

Memorial Highway)

Route 105 (Fort Eustis

Boulevard)Coleman Bridge YORK 106 $78

Route 171 (Victory

Boulevard)

Route 134 (Hampton

Highway)Poquoson CL YORK 106 $26

Virginia Beach Blvd Glenrock Rd Newtown Rd NOR 104 $85

Mt. Pleasant Road,

Phase 2Etheridge Rd Centerville Tnpk CHE 103 $20

Route 17 (G.W.

Memorial Highway)

1 mi North of Coleman

BridgeMain Street GLO 102 $89

Oyster Point Road Jefferson Ave Warwick Blvd (Rte 60) NN 101 $65

Brambleton Ave Midtown Tunnel I‐264 NOR 100 $76

Jefferson Avenue (Route

143)Green Grove Lane Fort Eustis Blvd (Route 105) NN 99 $29

Hampton Blvd 21st St 38th St NOR 98 $27

Little Creek Road Tidewater Dr Shore Dr NOR 97 $113

Victory Blvd Wythe Creek Rd York CL POQ 97 $11

South Independence

BlvdHolland Rd South Plaza Trail VB 96 $22

Route 171 (Victory

Boulevard)

Route 17 (George

Washington Memorial

Highway)

Route 134 (Hampton

Highway)YORK 95 $4

Independence Blvd Haygood Rd Northampton Blvd VB 94 $98

Princess Anne Road Providence Rd Salem Rd VB 94 $17

Dam Neck Road Princess Anne Rd Holland Rd VB 90 $31

Liberty Parkway (Patrick

Henry Place)Oyster Point Rd Freedom Way NN 89 $5

Shore Drive Norfolk CL Diamond Springs Rd VB 88 $6

South Church Street Battery Park Rd Talbot Dr IoW 87 $12

Independence BlvdDenbigh Blvd (Route

173)Fort Eustis Blvd (Route 105) NN 87 $12

Rosemont Road Buckner Blvd Lynnhaven Pkwy VB 87 $13

Newtown Road Virginia Beach Blvd Curlew Dr NOR 86 $129

Ironbound Road (Rt.

615)Richmond Road Longhill Connector WBG 86 $4

Hanbury Road Johnstown Rd Battlefield Blvd CHE 85 $16

1,2 Updated cost estimate for the entire I‐64 project corridor from I‐664 in Hampton Roads to I‐95 in Richmond is $4,700 Million ‐ $7,300 Million. Source: VDOT Draft EIS, October 2012

**YOE ‐ Cost estimates are expressed in Year‐0f‐Expenditure (YOE) dollars.

Ongoing Transportation Study

Project Name From To Locality Prioritization ScoreEstimated Cost of Project (YOE**)

(in Millions)

Attachment 11-A

7

2034 Vision Plan—Unfunded Highway Projects (Cont.)

General Booth Blvd Princess Anne Rd Dam Neck Rd VB 84 $117

North Great Neck Road Virginia Beach Blvd Wolfsnare Rd VB 84 $27

Ferrell Pkwy Pleasant Valley Rd Salem Rd VB 82 $31

Coliseum Drive

ConnectorColiseum Dr at Sentara Armistead Ave HM 80 $4

Mooretown Road

Extension

Northern Terminus of

Mooretown RdRochambeau Dr/Croaker Rd JCC 76 $16

Route 17 (G.W.

Memorial Highway)Main Street Ark Rd GLO 75 $35

Holland Road Dam Neck Rd Rosemont Rd VB 75 $57

US 258 Widening US 460 Sunset Dr IoW 71 $12

Laskin Road Great Neck Road Republic Rd VB 71 $47

Sandbridge Road Princess Anne Rd Atwoodtown Rd VB 71 $40

East Crossing of I‐264Constitution Dr

(Extension)South Independence Blvd VB 70 $117

West Neck Road North Landing Rd Indian River Rd VB 69 $5

Shoulders Hill Road

(Route 626)Bridge Rd (Route 17)

Nansemond Pkwy (Route

337)SUF 68 $41

West Crossing of I‐264 Aragona Blvd Bonney Rd VB 68 $51

General Booth Blvd Birdneck Rd Oceana Blvd VB 67 $37

Salem Road Elbow Rd Independence Blvd VB 67 $20

Virginia Beach Blvd I‐264 First Colonial Rd VB 67 $75

West Neck Pkwy Ext'd North Landing Rd Indian River Rd VB 67 $16

Butts Station Road Kempsville Rd Centerville Tnpk CHE 66 $21

Battery Park Road S. Church Street Nike Park Road IoW 66 $146

Route 17 (G.W.

Memorial Highway)Sawyers Mill Rd Moses Grandy Trail CHE 65 $11

Jeanne Street Constitution Dr Independence Blvd VB 65 $7

Skiffes Creek Connector

(Rte 60/143 Connector)

Green Mount Pkwy

IntersectionRoute 143 JCC 64 $35

Waters Road Phase 2 Old Vintage Rd Johnstown Rd CHE 63 $16

North Lynnhaven Road Kings Grant Rd Virginia Beach Blvd VB 63 $10

Silina Drive Rosemont Rd South Lynnhave Rd VB 63 $19

Woodlake Drive

ExtendedWoodlake Dr Battlefield Blvd CHE 62 $6

South Lynnhaven Road Virginia Beach Blvd Lynnhaven Pkwy VB 61 $11

Airport Access Road West RdDominion Blvd (US 17

South)CHE 59 $12

Princess Anne Road Sandbridge Rd Indian River Rd VB 56 $31

Harpersville Road Warwick Blvd (Rte 60) Jefferson Ave NN 55 $122

Indian River Road Elbow Rd North Landing Rd VB 55 $131

Waters Road Phase 1 Washington Dr Old Vintage Rd CHE 50 $12

Indian River Road West Neck Rd North Landing Rd VB 48 $43

Salem Road Elbow Rd North Landing Rd VB 47 $57

Seaboard Road Princess Anne Rd (North) Princess Anne Rd (South) VB 46 $59

Estimated Cost of Project (YOE**)

(in Millions)



Project Name From To Locality Prioritization Score

Attachment 11-A

8

2034 Vision Plan—Unfunded Bridge & Tunnel Projects

2034 Vision Plan—Unfunded Highway Interchange Projects

I‐264/Witchduck Interchange NA NA VB 192 $173

I‐264 EB Ramp from I‐64 WB Curlew Dr Witchduck Rd Multi 179 $97

I‐264/Independence Blvd

InterchangeNA NA VB 168 $250

I‐64/464 Interchange I‐64 EB / Battlefield Blvd I‐464 NB CHE 154 $19

Air Terminal Interchange NA NA NOR 150 $23

I‐64 @ Ft. Eustis Blvd NA NA NN 149 $134

I‐264/Lynnhaven Interchange

Phase II NA NA VB 145 $140

I‐64 Interchange @ Bland

Blvd/Denbigh BlvdNA NA NN 141 $129

I‐64/City Line Interchange and

ArterialI‐64 Centerville Tnpk Multi 114 $105

Chesapeake Expressway

Interchange @ Mt. Pleasant

Road

NA NA CHE 102 $26

Northampton Blvd/Shore Dr

InterchangeNA NA VB 99 $33

I‐64 @ Military Hwy Military Highway Northbound I‐64 Eastbound NOR 80 $29

I‐664/Terminal Avenue

InterchangeI‐664 at Terminal Interchange Jefferson Ave via 12th St. NN 65 $18



Project for Future Consideration

Project Name From To Locality

Estimated Cost of Project

(YOE**)

(in Millions)

Prioritization

Score

Patriots Crossing I‐564 I‐664 & VA‐164 Multi 221 $2,9322

HRBT/I‐64 (8‐lane) I‐64 / I‐664 Coliseum Junction I‐64 / I‐564 Junction Multi 208 $4,0001

Third Crossing: I‐664

WideningI‐64 / I‐664 Coliseum Junction I‐64 / I‐664 Bowers Hill Junction Multi 179 $2,462

MLK Freeway extension

to I‐464I‐264 I‐464 POR 176 $883

Fort Eustis Blvd Bridge

Replacements over Lee

Hall Resevoir

Warwick Blvd I‐64 NN 166 $6

I‐64 Southside Widening

(includes High‐Rise

Bridge replacement)

I‐64 / I‐464 Junction I‐64 / I‐664 Bowers Hill Junction CHE 160 $1,0803

Kings Highway Bridge Governors Wharf Lighthouse Drive SUF 139 $90Warwick Blvd Bridge

Replacement over Lake

Maury

Gatewood Road J. Clyde Morris Blvd NN 135 $7


1 Updated cost estimate for the entire project is $4,800 Million to 7,900 Million. Source: VDOT Draft EIS, December 2012. 2 Updated cost estimate is $3,122 Million ‐ $4,224 Million. Source: VDOT website. 3 Updated planning level cost estimate for the entire I‐64 corridor from I‐464 interchange to I‐664/I‐264 at Bowers Hill is $870 Million. The cost estimate includes $500 Million to replace the High Rise

Bridge; It does not include the interchange work at I‐464 or Bowers Hill. Source: VDOT, October 2012


Project Name From To LocalityEstimated Cost of Project (YOE**)

(in Millions)Prioritization Score

Attachment 11-A

2034 Vision Plan—Unfunded Transit Projects

2034 Vision Plan—Unfunded Intermodal Projects

9

2034 Vision Plan—Unfunded Passenger Rail Projects

VB Fixed Guideway

Transit Project1

Norfolk CL @ LRT

terminusOceanfront VB 204 *See note below

Naval Station Norfolk

Fixed Guideway Transit

Project

Newtown Road Naval Station Norfolk NOR 187 n/a

Fast Ferry Service Newport NewsNaval Station Norfolk

and Norfolk WatersideNN 130 n/a

Peninsula Fixed

Guideway Transit

Project (A3 Alignment)

Christopher Newport

UniversityHuntington Pointe NN 113 n/a

Peninsula Fixed

Guideway Transit

Project (A1 Alignment)

Newport News City

HallDenbigh Blvd NN 111 n/a

* Initial preliminary capital costs for the fixed guideway (light rail & bus rapid transit) alternatives between Newtown Road and Oceanfront via NCRR ROW are $807

Million for Light Rail and $450 Million for Bus Rapid Transit. The costs are no longer current and are being refined as part of HRT's Virginia Beach Transit Extension

Study (VBTES) . Source: HRT website


Project Name From To LocalityEstimated Total Capital Cost of

Project

Prioritization

Score

Finney Ave Flyover Pinner StRoute 13/337 E

Washington StSUF 139 $25

Hampton Blvd (Route 337) Interchange ‐

Int'l Terminal Blvd Gate Improvement

Trouville

Ave/Portor StHampton Blvd NOR 115 $204


Project Name From To Locality

Estimated Cost of Project

(YOE**)

(in Millions)

Prioritization

Score

High‐Speed and Intercity

Passenger RailRichmond Hampton Roads Multi N/A $785 (Tier I FEIS)



Project Name From To LocalityPrioritization

Score

Estimated Total Capital Cost of

Project (YOE**)

(in Millions)

Attachment 11-A

HRTPO Staff

Dwight L. Farmer, P.E.

Executive Director/Secretary

Camelia Ravanbakht, Ph.D.

Deputy Executive Director

LRTP Team

Pavithra Parthasarathi, Ph.D., P.E.

Principal Transportation Engineer

Dale M. Stith, AICP, GISP

Senior Transportation Planner

Theresa Jones

Transportation Engineer

Public Involvement Team

Kendall L. Miller

Public Involvement & Title VI Administrator

Brian Chenault

Community Outreach Planner

Brian Miller

Web & Graphics Designer

Attachment 11-A

264

64

64

264

264464

664

64

64

564

64

64

Voting members include a representative from the following:an elected official from each locality, listed in the map:

*A portion of Gloucester County

is included in the

metropolitan planning

area.

Public Transit Agencies

Hampton Roads

Transit

Williamsburg Area

Transit Authority

State Agencies

Virginia Department

of Transportation

Virginia Department

of Rail and Public

Transportation

Virginia Port

Authority

Virginia General Assembly

Two Members of

the Virginia Senate

Two Members of

the Virginia House

of Delegates

Chief Administrative Officers for all Member Localities

Federal Highway Administration

Federal Transit Administration

Federal Aviation Administration

Virginia Department of Aviation

Peninsula Airport Authority

Norfolk Airport Authority

Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee

Freight Transportation Advisory Committee

Military Liaisons

Invited Participants from the Commonwealth Transportation Board

Non-Voting members include a representative from the following:

Attachment 11-A

Project Utility (Project Effectiveness)

• Congestion

• System Continuity and Connectivity

• Safety and Security

• Cost Effectiveness

• Land Use Compatibility

• Modal Enhancements

• Regional Significance

Economic Vitality (Potential for Economic Gain)

• Total Reduction in Travel Time

• Improved Travel Time Reliability

• Increased Access to High Density Employment

• Improved Travel Times to Defense Installations, Ports, Tourism Areas

• Increase Opportunity

• Impact on Truck Movement

Project Viability(Project Readiness)

• %Funding Committed

• % Design Complete

• Prior Planning Commitment

• NEPA Documents/Decisions

• Right‐of‐Way /Utility Coordination

List of Evaluated, Scored, and Ranked Candidate Projects

2034 Fiscally‐Constrained Long‐Range Transportation Plan

Hampton Roads Transportation Fund (HRTF/HB2313) Candidate Projects

Attachment 11-B

Hampton Roads Transportation Fund (HRTF/HB2313) Candidate Projects

§̈¦64

§̈¦564

§̈¦264§̈¦464

§̈¦64

§̈¦264

§̈¦664

£¤60

£¤460

£¤17

£¤58

OP168

OP199

£¤13

US 460 Relocated§̈¦664

§̈¦564

§̈¦464§̈¦264

§̈¦64

§̈¦264

Prepared by the HRTPO, October 2013

§̈¦64

£¤460

£¤58£¤460

£¤58

£¤17

Source: VDOT/HRTPO

Total Cost of HRTF Candidate Projects: $8,660 Million

I‐64 Southside Widening

$1.7 BillionI‐64 Southside Widening (includes High‐Rise Bridge)

I‐64/I‐264 Interchange Improvements

$310 MillionI‐64/I‐264 Interchange

US Route 460/58/13 Connector

SPSA Overpass at Regional Landfill

HR Executive Airport Overpass

$150 MillionUS Route 460/58/13 Connector

I‐64 Peninsula Widening (Interim 6‐Lane Option)

$160 MillionSegment 2 ‐ Ft. Eustis Blvd (exit 250)to Route 199 East of Williamsburg (exit 242)

$90 MillionSegment 3 ‐ Route 199 East of Williamsburg (exit 242)to Route 199 West of Williamsburg (exit 234)

$150 MillionFt. Eustis Interchange

$100 MillionSegment 1 ‐ Jefferson Ave (exit 255)to Ft. Eustis Blvd (exit 250)1

HR Third Crossing

Bowers Hill Interchange

$3 BillionThird Crossing ‐ I‐664 Wideining (includes Bowers Hill Interchange)

$3 BillionThird Crossing ‐ Patriots Crossing (with Craney Island Connector)2

2 Craney Island Connector will be constructed and funded as partof the port expansion project and therefore will not use HRTF revenues.

1 I‐64 Peninsula Widening Segment 1 ‐ Jefferson Avenue to Ft. Eustis Blvd is fully funded in FY2014‐2019 SYIP and therefore will not use HRTF revenues.

Note: Costs are expressed in Year‐of‐Expenditure dollars, which is a unit of cost that accounts for inflation through the development, construction, and opening of a project.

Attachment 11-B

Attachment 11-C


AGENDA ITEM #12: FUTURE CTAC MEETING AGENDA ITEMS April 2014 Thursday, April 10, 2014

• FY 2015-2018 Transportation Improvement Program: Final • Transit Extension Studies Update: Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) • Transportation District Commission of Hampton Roads (HRT) Advisory

Committees • 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP): Status Update


AGENDA ITEM #13: FOR YOUR INFORMATION A. 2014 SCHEDULE OF CTAC MEETINGS

The remainder of 2014 regular meetings of the CTAC will be held quarterly, at 12:00 p.m. on the second Thursday of April, July, and October. Meetings shall be held in the Regional Building Board Room, 723 Woodlake Drive, Chesapeake, VA. Remaining meeting dates for 2014 are as follows:

• April 10, 2014 • July 10, 2014 • October 9, 2014

B. HRTPO 2014 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA

At its November 21, 2013 meeting, the HRTPO Board approved the 2014 Legislative Agenda for consideration for the 2014 General Assembly Session, which has been organized in the form of an HRTPO Board Resolution (attached). Attachement 13-B

C. SPEAKER WILLIAM J. HOWELL ADDRESSES THE HRTPO

On Monday, December 9, 2013, Virginia House of Delegates Speaker William J. Howell addressed the public, outlining legislative ideas for transportation reform in the Commonwealth. Speaker Howell was joined by several members of the Hampton Roads General Assembly Delegation. Below, are highlights from the speech made by Speaker Howell: Harness technology, innovation and new ideas:

• Build smarter transportation systems to improve performance for drivers. For example, synchronizing traffic signals at intersections can reduce stops by as much as 40 percent, cut gas consumption by 10 percent, cut emissions by 22 percent, and reduce travel time by 25 percent.

• Build systems with real-time data mechanisms will allow us to analyze how traffic moves and better predict what solutions will be needed both in the short- and long-term.

• Alert drivers of congestion before it happens and respond to accidents in seconds, not minutes.


With the filing of legislation creating the “Innovation and Technology in Transportation Fund” to be endowed from existing resources and dedicated to finding new ways to use technology in Virginia’s transportation system, the General Assembly will be called upon to take the following actions:

• General Assembly should ask the Virginia Department of Transportation to update, revise and rewrite their regional “Smart Travel Program” plans. These programs were developed in 2006, which to many of us may not seem like long ago. But at a time when technology changes by the minute, this has been an eternity.

• General Assembly should pass legislation directing the Secretary of Transportation and VDOT to develop statewide goals for the use of technology solutions and to develop an achievable plan of action to reach those goals within the next five years.

Create a consumer-based model that focuses on congestion relief, safety and economic development:

• Virginia should explore further use congestion-relief, performance pricing models similar to those deployed on the I-495 Express lanes

• Virginia should work to streamline, improve and innovate its traffic operations management systems, using technology and data to monitor traffic and congestion

• Virginia should seek to create new, regional ‘accident clearing teams’ in order to prevent large-scale disruptions during peak hours

• General Assembly should form a Transportation Solutions Working Group within the Commonwealth Transportation Board charged solely with the task of brainstorming new and innovative ideas to address congestion relief and turning those ideas into actionable plans that Virginia can implement.

• General Assembly should ask the Virginia Department of Transportation to create a series of congestion-relief pilot zones in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads, similar to the Smart Road in Southwest Virginia in order to test and refine these solutions.

• Commonwealth Transportation Board should develop a comprehensive metrics table

• VDOT should prioritize projects to include these metrics across the state of Virginia

Speaker Howell’s speech may be viewed in its entirety by visiting: http://hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/HR-Speech-for-Release.pdf A video of Speaker Howell’s address may be viewed by visiting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFxnYgDxyeU&feature=share&list=UUauYP2MoS5p4bKPonnvhuCw

http://hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/HR-Speech-for-Release.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFxnYgDxyeU&feature=share&list=UUauYP2MoS5p4bKPonnvhuCw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFxnYgDxyeU&feature=share&list=UUauYP2MoS5p4bKPonnvhuCw


D. 2040 LRTP VISITION STATEMENT AND GOALS At its meeting on November 21, 2013, the HRTPO Board approved the 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Vision Statement and Goals.

The visioning process is an important step in developing a Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) as it provides an opportunity to gain input from locality and other stakeholder technical staffs, as well as the general public, regarding the future transportation system for Hampton Roads. The Vision and Goals for the 2040 LRTP were generated by reviewing survey responses submitted by the public, comprehensive plans from localities, MAP-21 planning factors, and VTrans 2035 guidelines. The draft 2040 LRTPO Vision Statement and Goals were made available for public review and comment from August 28, 2013 through September 27, 2013. No public comments were received. Attachment 13-D

E. HRTPO DRAFT REPORTS UNDER REVIEW

1. Prioritizing Highway Projects for Improvement of Evacuation: Draft Under current conditions, in the event of a hurricane, it is possible that only a portion of the people living in homes in low-lying areas of Hampton Roads will be able to evacuate. Due to the number of households in low-lying areas, and given the current capacity of evacuation highways (including the planned reversal of I-64), it may take 36 hours to clear evacuation highways for a Category 3 storm. However, due to the uncertainty associated with the final path of an approaching storm, local citizens and governments may not begin evacuation 36 hours before the arrival of tropical storm force winds. Therefore, to increase the likelihood of evacuation success, it is desirable to increase the capacity of evacuation highways. Given that no prioritized list of highway projects for improving evacuation exists for Hampton Roads, the purpose of this study (draft attached) is to prepare a prioritized list of highway projects that improve evacuation. The draft version of Prioritizing Highway Projects for Improvement of Evacuation will be made available for public review and comment from January 8, 2014 through January 22, 2014. The draft Prioritizing Highway Projects for Improvement of Evacuation report may be accessed at: http://www.hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/Prioritizing%20Highway%20Projects%20for%20Improvement%20of%20Hurricane%20Evacuation.pdf

http://www.hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/Prioritizing%20Highway%20Projects%20for%20Improvement%20of%20Hurricane%20Evacuation.pdf

http://www.hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/Prioritizing%20Highway%20Projects%20for%20Improvement%20of%20Hurricane%20Evacuation.pdf


2. Positioning Hampton Roads for Freight Infrastructure Funding: Draft MAP-21 legislation included a number of provisions to improve the condition and performance of the National Freight Network and support investment in freight-related surface transportation projects. It places strong emphasis on freight movement and requires participation from States, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), and other stakeholders. States and MPOs that are organized, with data and analyses, will better position themselves for potential funding initiatives in the next authorization. This study analyzed Hampton Roads’ highways that are anticipated to be part of the National Freight Network. It addressed several required elements of the National Freight Strategic Plan [the Hampton Roads portion] where data is available (condition and performance, freight bottlenecks on highways, forecasted truck volumes, major trade gateways). Upon approval by the HRTPO Board, the findings of this regional study will be forwarded to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) [with a copy to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)] in order to assist its development of the National Freight Strategic Plan. The draft version of Positioning Hampton Roads for Freight Infrastructure Funding: MAP-21 and Beyond will be made available for public review and comment from January 8, 2014 through January 22, 2014. The draft Positioning Hampton Roads for Freight Infrastructure Funding: MAP-21 and Beyond may be accessed at: http://www.hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/Map-21%20Freight%20Study%20Draft%20Report.pdf

F. FY 2013 ANNUAL OBLIGATION REPORT

In accordance with federal regulations, within 90 calendar days following the end of the federal fiscal year (the federal fiscal year runs from October 1 through September 30), the state, public transportation operators, and the MPO shall cooperatively develop a listing of projects for which federal funds were obligated during that federal fiscal year. The listing, referred to as an Annual Obligation Report (AOR), shall be published or otherwise made available in accordance with the MPO’s public participation criteria for the TIP. The FY 2013 AOR was posted on the HRTPO website on December 19, 2013. The AOR may be accessed at the following links: http://www.hrtpo.org/page/annual-obligation-report/ http://www.hrtpotip.org/PDFs/FY 2013-Annual Obligation Report.pdf

http://www.hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/Map-21%20Freight%20Study%20Draft%20Report.pdf

http://www.hrtpo.org/uploads/docs/Map-21%20Freight%20Study%20Draft%20Report.pdf

http://www.hrtpo.org/page/annual-obligation-report/

http://www.hrtpotip.org/PDFs/FY%202013-Annual%20Obligation%20Report.pdf


G. HAMPTON ROADS TRANSIT: PROPOSED FARE POLICY CHANGES Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) will hold eight public hearings in January on the proposed fare increases for customers of bus, ferry, light rail and paratransit services, following approval by the agency’s governing board. The public will be asked to comment on a proposal to increase the cost of a single ride by 50 cents while also eliminating some categories of other fares to simplify the agency’s fare structure. To learn more about the Fare Study and access the schedule of public hearings, please visit: http://www.gohrt.com/fares/proposed-fare-policy-changes/

H. HRTPO BOARD MEETING The Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO) Board will meet on Thursday, January 16, 2014 in the Regional Building Board Room. The meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. CTAC members will receive an email highlighting opportunities for public comment on agenda items for the January 16th meeting along with their Board agenda packet.

http://www.gohrt.com/fares/proposed-fare-policy-changes/

Attachment 13-B

2040Long‐RangeTransportationPlan:VisionStatementandGoalsVisionStatement

With an engaged public, the 2040 Long‐Range Transportation Plan sets forth a vision todevelop a well‐balanced transportation system that promotes good quality of life whileenhancingtheuniquecharacterofHamptonRoads.Goals

Supporttheeconomicvitalityofthemetropolitanarea,enablingglobalcompetitiveness,productivity,andefficiency.

Increase the safety of the transportation system for all users, including minimizingconflictsbetweenmotorizedandnon‐motorizedmodes.

Ensurethesecurityoftheregion'stransportationinfrastructureanditsusers.

Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation and improve thequalityoflife.

Considertheimpactoftransportationinvestmentsontheenvironment.

Promotecompatibilitybetween transportation improvementsandplanned landuseandeconomicdevelopmentpatterns.

Increaseaccessibilityandmobilityofpeopleandgoods.

Provideavarietyoftransportationoptionsthataccommodatesallusers.

Increase the coordination of the transportation system, across and betweenmodes, forpeopleandgoods.

Promoteanefficientandreliableregionaltransportationsystem.

Preserveandmaintaintheexistingtransportationsystem.

Engageadiversepublicinthedevelopmentoftheregion’stransportationsystem.

Continue to work towards finding dedicated and sustainable revenue sources fortransportationtoclosethefundinggap.

Attachment 13-D


AGENDA ITEM #14: OLD/NEW BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM #15: ADJOURNMENT

PLEASE RSVP BY COB MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2014 Agenda.pdf · PLEASE RSVP BY COB MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2014...

Documents

Transcript of PLEASE RSVP BY COB MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2014 Agenda.pdf · PLEASE RSVP BY COB MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2014...