Please comply with the Lean Construction Institute’s … 2030 Commitment Report 2010 56 out of 125...

46
Please comply with the Lean Construction Institute’s Usage Policies and Attribution Guidelines at http://www.leanconstruction.org/usage.pdf when using this file. Thank you.

Transcript of Please comply with the Lean Construction Institute’s … 2030 Commitment Report 2010 56 out of 125...

Please comply with the Lean Construction Institute’s Usage Policies and Attribution Guidelines at http://www.leanconstruction.org/usage.pdf

when using this file. Thank you.

Provider Name: Lean Construction Institute

Provider Number – H561

Course Name: Improving the Way We Work: Principles of Lean Design Course Number – 20121010PM

Course Speakers: Laura Lesniewski, Will Loftis, Bernita Beikmann, Jennifer Taylor, Luciana Burdi, Bevan Mace, John Bechtel, Steve DiBartolo, David Riz, Amanda Goolsby Course Date: October 10, 2012

Credit(s) earned on completion of this course will be reported to AIA CES for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non-AIA members are available upon request.

This course is registered with AIA CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. _______________________________________

____

Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.

This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the presentation without written

permission of the speaker is prohibited.

© Lean Construction Institute 2012

Copyright Materials

This session trains participants about the fundamental principles of lean design, such as co-location, team education, and an enlightened perspective about the nature of design. We will touch on lean as it relates to high-performance buildings, and incorporate case studies from participants in projects that used lean methodologies to improve the design of their facilities and change the way they deliver a project in design and construction.

Course Description

Learning Objectives

1) Uncover strategies and pitfalls associated with a Lean Transformation for a public agency including demonstrating results and coordinating implementation of Lean Construction practices to support process improvement. 2) Understand what specific procurement changes are needed for Owners to enable lean delivery of projects and establish a governance structure to enable decision making. 3) Gain an understanding of the need for each team member to reinvent themselves on a continual basis in response to the constant project dynamics and understand how this leads to greater sustainability. 4) Identify critical concepts around team collocation and integrated team dynamics in order to be more fully prepared to optimize the results.

At the end of the this course, participants will be able to:

High-Performance Buildings + Green Rating Systems14th Annual LCI Congress

Arlington VA | 10 October 2012

Laura Lesniewski AIA | BNIM

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 1

Arlington, VA | 10 October 2012

Green RatingGreen Rating SystemsSystems

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 2

Measuring Green | 15 June 2012 | 3

Measuring Green | 15 June 2012 | 4© 2011 Int’l Living Future Institute www.livingbuildingchallenge.org

2030 Challenge: Carbon TargetsCarbon Neutral by 2030:No fossil fuels for energy to operate the building

120 

80 

100 

on

60 

Redu

ctio

20 

40 % R

‐2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 5

Target Year

One Planet CommunityMontreal, Quebec

Zero CarbonReduce building emissions by 100%

Zero WasteReduce construction and solid waste by 98%

Sustainable TransportReduce transport emissions by 71%

Local and Sustainable MaterialsSource at least 30% of materials regionally

Local and Sustainable Food40% of all food from local farms and on site gardens40% of all food from local farms and on‐site gardens

Sustainable WaterReduce municipal water use by 627 liters per day (80% reduction)

Natural Habitats and Wildlife54% of site as natural habitat and greenspaces

Culture and Heritageh l l l d hEnhance local culture and heritage

Equity and Fair TradeOne job for every five units of housing, 15% affordable and fair trade

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 6

Health and HappinessA new standard for healthier, happier lifestyles

Data

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 7

Buildings’ Impact on the EnvironmentDesign and Construction – U.S. Green Building Council, 2006

Contribution of buildings in the U.S.:g

65% of total U.S. electricity consumption >36% of total U.S. primary energy use 30% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions

136 illi t f t ti d d liti t i 136 million tons of construction and demolition waste in the U.S. (approx. 2.8 lbs/person/day)

12% of potable water in the U.S.% o potab e ate t e U S 40% (3 billion tons annually) of raw materials use globally

Measuring Green | 15 June 2012 | 8

Kiowa County Schools8%

yCity of Greensburg, Kansas 48%

Projected Energy Savings

Measuring Green | 15 June 2012 | 9

Kiowa County Schools (K‐12) – Greensburg, Kansas 

percent of building that is daylit

Omega Center for

98%percent of energy

for Sustainable LivingRhinebeck, New York

supplied by on-site renewable energy

100%percent of precipitation managed on-sitemanaged on site

100%percent of percent of construction waste diverted from landfill

Measuring Green | 15 June 2012 | 10

99%

Post-Occupancy Energy Analysis

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 11

AIA 2030 Commitment Report2010

56 out of 125 committed firms reported

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 12

56 out of 125 committed firms reported48% response rate

Predicted Energy Use Intensity2010 v. 2011

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 13

Projects Modeled2010 v. 2011

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 14

Evaluation per Building2030 Challenge

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 15

Evaluation by Project Type2030 Challenge

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 16

Evaluation by Mechanical Engineer2030 Challenge

AABCDEFGHIJJKLMNOP

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 17

net zero LEED 60%60%water

LEED PLATINUMBETTER THAN

BASELINEBETTER THAN

BASELINE

20

BASELINEBASELINE

ONE PLANET COMMUNITIES

20 KBTU/SF

SUSTAINABLEKBTU/SF

zerostormwater2030ZERO

Measuring Green | 15 June 2012 | 18

stormwaterrunoffChallengeWASTE

%

REDUCTION INABSENTEEISM

ELECTRICITY USAGE

6 %

INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY -1.43 Kw/day

9% 60% INCREASE IN ORDERS

EMBODIED CO2

-1,387 mt

Measuring Green | 15 June 2012 | 19LEWIS AND CLARK STATE OFFICE BUILDING 

BANNISTER FEDERAL COMPLEX

OMEGA CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE LIVING

Paradigm Shiftg

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 20

Green Arts DistrictIntegrated Systems

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 21

LEED Regenerative Design Tool

Biomimicry + BNIM – 23 May 2012 | 22

Regenerative Design“Towards a Regenerative Paradigm for the Built Environment” Chrisna du PlessisEnvironment , Chrisna du Plessis

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 23

LessonsLessons LearnedLearned

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 24

Green Buildings and Human HealthU.S. Green Building Council Research

Effects of Green Buildings on Employee Health and Productivity (Singh, Syal, Grady, Korkmaz)

Indoor Air Quality Scientific Findings Resource Bank (Lawrence Berkeley Labs)

Energy Savings and Performance Gains in GSA Buildings (U.S. GSA)

Public Health and Economic Impact of Dampness and Mold (Mudarriof Dampness and Mold (Mudarri, Fisk)

Sound Control for Improved Outcomes in Healthcare Settings (Joseph, Ulrich)

Occupant Satisfaction with Indoor Environment Quality in Green Buildings (Center for Built

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 25http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=77#occupant

Buildings (Center for Built Environment, UC Berkeley)

Sustainability Nears a Tipping PointMIT Sloan Management Review, - Research Report Winter 2012

1970 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2011

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 26

The Impact of Behavior on Carbon EmissionsOne Planet Communities - Bioregional 42% In the UK (BedZED) reductions in carbon:

58% = building envelope, equipment & renewable energy

behavioral change in U.K.

42% = behavior changes (food, personal transport, waste)

In the US (SMV), predicted reductions in carbon: 69% 31% = buildings envelope, equipment & renewable energy69% = behavior changes (food, personal transport, waste)

69% behavioral 

changes in U.S.

Lifestyle and behavior changes are important!

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 27

Trajectory of Environmentally Responsible DesignWilliam Reed, 2006

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 28

Lean + Green

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 29

14 PrinciplesThe Toyota Way, Jeffrey Liker

Long-Term Philosophyg y

1 Decisions based on long-term philosophy, even if p p yagainst short-term financial goals

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 30

14 PrinciplesThe Toyota Way, Jeffrey Liker

The Right Process Will Produce the Right Results

2 Continuous process flow; problems to the surface

3 Pull system to avoid overproduction

4 L l t th kl d4 Level out the workload5 Culture of stopping to fix

problemsproblems6 Standardized tasks7 Visual control

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 31

8 Reliable/tested technology

14 PrinciplesThe Toyota Way, Jeffrey Liker

Add Value to the Organization by Developing Your People and Partners

9 Grow leaders who understand the work, live the philosophy, teach it to othersothers

10 Develop exceptional people

11 Respect extended network of partners; challenge and help them

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 32

help them

14 PrinciplesThe Toyota Way, Jeffrey Liker

Continuously Solving Root Problems Drives Organizational Learning

12 Go and see for yourself13 Make decisions slowly;

implement rapidly14 B l i14 Become a learning

organization through relentless reflection and continuous improvement

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 33

Lean Construction Institute

Collaborate,Really Collaborate

Five Big Ideas

IncreaseOptimize

The WholeRelatedness

Projects as Networks ofCommitment

Tightly CoupleLearning w/ Action

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 34

Conclusions

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 35

ConclusionsGreen Rating Systems

BENEFITS OF GREEN RATING SYSTEMSSYSTEMS:

• Have helped raise awareness• Have begun to help us

predict/measure building performance

• Have helped us positively impact built environmentsbuilt environments

• Have provided industry standards / consistency

• Have raised the bar for someHave raised the bar for some design teams with regard to building performance, material selection, human health

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 36

ConclusionsGreen Rating Systems

PITFALLS OF GREEN RATING SYSTEMSSYSTEMS:

• Have oversimplified some issues• Shift focus from understanding the

overall complexity of true sustainability

• Discourage real integrated thinking / designthinking / design

• Do not really address impacts of behavioral patterns

• Reflect agendas of those thatReflect agendas of those that create them, rather than a true ecological perspective

• Limit achievement (“good enough”)

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 37

ConclusionsIntegrated Design Approach

PARADIGM SHIFT TO REGENERATIVE DESIGNDESIGN:

• Suggests: Integrate, really integrate- Shift emphasis from metrics to

relationships, interconnectivity, and understanding nature’s principles

• Can continue to learn from lean philosophy / methodologiesphilosophy / methodologies

• Requires continued research to support evidence-based learning

• Requires both revolutionary andRequires both revolutionary and evolutionary change- Custom to mass to lean production- Become a learning industry

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 38

g y

Thank You

Laura [email protected]

High-Performance Building + Green Rating Systems | LCI Congress | 10 October 2012 | 39

This concludes The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems Course

Lean Construction Institute [email protected]