PLANNING DECISIONS September 2019 Discharge … › sites › default › files › September...an...

of 25

PLANNING DECISIONS – September 2019

Application No : 16/01161/DOC Decision : Discharge Of

Conditions Location : 59 Rawreth Lane Rayleigh SS6 9QD Proposal : Discharge of Condition 2 on application 15/00376/FUL:

(Submission of External Materials) Demolish Detached Garage to Rear of Site Sub-divide Plot and Construct Detached Three Bedroomed Bungalow

Applicant : Mr Price Application No : 17/00636/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Wallasea Island Wild Coast Project Creeksea Ferry Road

Wallasea Island Proposal : Installation of floating pontoon and jetty at grassland point

and provision of footpath on crest of seawall for passenger ferry

Applicant : RSPB - Mr Jeff Kew Application No : 18/00490/DOC Decision : Discharge Of

Conditions Location : Land Rear Of 40 Mount Crescent Mount Avenue Hockley Proposal : Application to Discharge Conditions 4 (Materials) and 8

(Driveway Materials) in relation to Planning Consent 17/00713/FUL

Applicant : Mr Woodrow Barker Application No : 18/00578/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning

Permission Location : Land Rear Of 18 Ashingdon Road Rochford Proposal : Proposed One Bedroom Bungalow with Parking and

Amenity Space. Applicant : Mr Flowers Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The development by reason of its layout taking into account its close proximity

and relationship with that rear back land area which is to continue to serve 4 flats at 18 Ashingdon Road would appear cramped. The frontage to the dwelling would be dominated by parking space which is to serve un-

of 25

associated residential development with consequential detrimental impacts upon the amenity of the property at this aspect with particular regards to expected levels of outlook and privacy. The proposed development is considered to be at odds with prevailing national and local planning policy guidance that relates to good design and thus conflicts with Chapter 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (achieving well designed places) , policy CP1 of the council's Local Development Frameworks Core Strategy ((adopted December 2011) and policies Dm1 and DM3 of the Framework's Development Management Plan (adopted 16 December 2014) .

2 The development has not demonstrated that the root protection area of the

protected Oak tree the subject of Tree Preservation Order 01/00 can be safeguarded, nor adequate mitigation deployed where it may be affected. It is considered that the method of calculation of the root protection area of this tree is flawed in that the methodology which has been relied upon to define the root protection area relates to development other than residential development where foundation depths would be greater than those applied to garden structures. The development is considered to conflict with Chapter 15 of the National Planning Policy Framework (Conserving and Enhancing the Natural Environment) and Policy DM25 of the Framework's Development Management Plan (adopted 16 December 2014).

Application No : 18/00910/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Lenden Lodge 146 Rectory Avenue Rochford Proposal : First Floor Front Extension and Single Storey Front, Side

and Rear Extensions and Juliet Balcony to Rear Applicant : Mr And Mrs Schofield Application No : 18/00993/LDC Decision : Refuse Lawful

Development Certificate

Location : Greenacres Victor Gardens Hawkwell Proposal : Lawful Development Certificate for the Retention of Use of

Land for Recreational Caravanning, Camping, Storage of Touring Caravans and Siting of One Mobile Home

Applicant : Mr Peter Collins Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The application does not provide information that would substantiate the use

of the site for the purpose of recreational caravanning, camping, storage of touring caravans and siting of one mobile or that the same has been implemented and retained as approved under planning permission granted for the same under 91/00399/F

Application No : 18/01009/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Land Rear Of 1 To 8 Stile Lane Rayleigh Proposal : Two 3 bedroom bungalows with parking Applicant : Eastway Homes Ltd - Mr Oliver Hall

of 25

Application No : 18/01033/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission

Location : 3 Rawreth Hall Cottages Rawreth Lane Rawreth Proposal : Two storey side extension Applicant : Ms Anne Cottis Reason(s) for Refusal

1 Policy DM17 of the Council’s Development Management Document

provides that for dwellings located in the Green Belt, the total size of a dwelling as extended, including any extension which may have previously been added, will not normally exceed the original floor space by more than 25%. Given the scale of the proposed extension and the existing additions to which it would join, the proposal is considered to be excessive, rather than reasonable, resulting in a substantial change in the size of the original property and a substantial increase in bulk, contrary to Policy DM17 and detrimental to the openness of the Green Belt. This is considered to represent a disproportionate addition contrary to paragraph 13 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and is thus considered inappropriate development within the Green Belt. No very special circumstances have been put forward to outweigh harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and it is not considered that any such circumstances exist.

Application No : 18/01129/REM Decision : Application Permitted Location : Land West Of Little Wakering Road And South Of Barrow

Hall Road Little Wakering Proposal : Reserved matters planning application seeking approval of

appearance, landscaping, layout and scale details pursuant to outline planning permission ref: 16/00731/OUT for 120 dwellings with associated open space and parking

Applicant : Sanctuary Homes And Cogent Land LLP Application No : 18/01189/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful


Location : Scaldhurst Farm Lark Hill Road Canewdon Proposal : Application for a certificate of lawfulness for a proposed loft

conversion with flat roof rear dormer Applicant : Mr Gavin French Application No : 19/00019/LBC Decision : Grant Listed Building

Consent Location : 22 South Street Rochford Essex Proposal : Proposal to Re-instate and Convert an Existing Outbuilding

to Provide 2 No. 1-Bed Dwelling Units within the C3 Use Class.

Applicant : Parabar Development Ltd

of 25

Application No : 19/00063/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning

Permission Location : Horseshoe Stables Blountswood Road Hullbridge Proposal : Extend and convert stable to provide dwelling Applicant : Miss C Newbery Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The National Planning Policy Framework at Paragraph 145 indicates that a

local planning authority should regard the construction of new buildings as inappropriate in the Green Belt. Exceptions to this include the extension or alteration of a building provided that it does not result in disproportionate additions over and above the size of the original building. The proposed development would entail an additional element amounting to approximately 29 m2 of additional floor space which would almost double the footprint of the building which would be tantamount to a disproportionate addition thus rendering the development inappropriate by definition. It is considered that the proposed development as a result would cause inevitable harm to Green Belt openness thus undermining one of the five key purposes of including land within it which would conflict with the underlying principles of the National Planning Policy Framework 2019.

2 The building is not considered to be of a permanent or substantial

construction capable of supporting a genuine conversion. It is considered that the proposal by reason of the physical works required to make the building habitable would be substantial and would not fall within the description of what could be considered to be a conversion which involves the use and re use of the existing fabric of a building such that on a proportionate level the retention of existing fabric far outweighs the proportion of new elements introduced to a building. The circumstances of the case fail therefore to comply with the requirements of policy

DM13 of the Local Development Framework's Development Management Plan (2014). No very special circumstances are considered to exists in this case which materially outweigh the harm found by the development in terms of impacts upon Green Belt openness.


Permission Location : The Mill Rear Of 8 St Johns Road Great Wakering Proposal : Proposed change of use of existing buildings to provide 5

No. 1-bed flats with associated parking and amenity space. Including alteration and part demolition of existing buildings.

Applicant : Prestige Pets - Natalie Ellis Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The visitor parking provision fails to meet the standards set out in policy DM30. 2 The proposed centrally positioned shared amenity space totalling 106m2 falls short of the private amenity space of 25m2 per flat requirement set out in Supplementary Planning Document 2.

of 25

Application No : 19/00180/ADV Decision : Application Permitted Location : The Bull Inn 99 Main Road Hockley Proposal : Erection of a totem pub sign with an externally illuminated

header, installation of an externally illuminated pub sign , an illuminated "3D" Bull, a non-illuminated free standing car park sign, a non-illuminated information sign at car park entrance and a non-illuminated directional sign.

Applicant : Greene King Plc Application No : 19/00181/LBC Decision : Grant Listed Building

Consent Location : The Bull Inn 99 Main Road Hockley Proposal : Reinstatement of "The Bull" pub sign on front of building,

the 3-D projecting Bull sign and accessible ramp sign on the side of the building. External lighting affixed to building.

Applicant : Greene King Plc Application No : 19/00203/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning

Permission Location : Canewdon Hall Farm Canewdon Hall Farm Canewdon Proposal : Demolish existing chalet house and construct new dwelling Applicant : Mr & Mrs Robinson Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The application site lies within the Metropolitan Green Belt as identified in the

Rochford District Council Local Development Framework Allocations Plan. The National Planning Policy Framework sets out the general presumption against inappropriate development within the Green Belt. Such development should not be approved except in very special circumstances. Very special circumstances to justify inappropriate development will not exist unless the potential harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations.

The proposed replacement dwelling would fail to meet the criteria set out in

Policy DM21 of the Rochford District Council Local Development Framework Development Management Plan, in that the proposed floorspace would exceed 25% of that of the original dwelling rendering such development inappropriate development by definition contrary to paragraph 145 of the National Planning Policy Framework (February 2019) and Policy DM21 of the Rochford District Council Local Development Framework Development Management Plan.

2 It is not considered that the applicant's position with regards to the permitted

development fall-back position is a valid position, given the significantly greater harm found by the development proposed under this planning application compared to the lesser degree of harm which would arise if the permitted development fallback position were to be implemented. The permitted development fallback position is considered wholly insufficient such that it can be given such weighting that would amount to the very special

of 25

circumstances which would need to exist to clearly outweigh the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and the other harm identified. The development would, therefore, be contrary to Policy DM21 of the Rochford District Council Local Development Framework Development Management Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (February 2019).


Permission Location : 66 Lower Road Hullbridge Essex Proposal : Demolish Existing Building and Construct Three Storey

Building Comprising 3 No. One Bedroomed and 5 No. Two Bedroomed Flats With Parking and Access to Front and Rear

Applicant : Mr Brett Wakeling Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The development by reason of its bulk would appear as an incongruous and

overly dominant structure within the street scene resulting in an overbearing physical presence within the street scene to the detriment of visual amenity. It is considered that the development by reason of its size and scale is incompatible with the scale and character of the built residential form which characterises the street scene at Lower Road and within the wider vicinity thus conflicting with policies DM1 and DM 3 of the Rochford District Council Local Development Framework Development Management plan and the provisions of Supplementary Planning Guidance 2 (House design)

2 The building proposed would be greater in width, depth and height than

number 64 Lower Road adjoining the site. Given this fact together with the close physical relationship which would exist between number 64 and the proposed development, it is considered that the proposed building in terms of its physical mass would amount to an overbearing physical presence from the perspective of the amenity of occupiers to number 64 Lower Road thus conflicting with policies DM1 and DM 3 of the Rochford District Council Local Development Framework Development Management plan and the provisions of Supplementary Planning Guidance 2 (Housing design)

Application No : 19/00262/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful


Location : Havana House Havana Drive Rayleigh Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for

Existing rear single storey kitchen extension, first floor bedroom extension and rear dormer extension

Applicant : Mr Darren Smart

of 25

Application No : 19/00276/NMA Decision : Application Permitted Location : 69 Rayleigh Avenue Eastwood SS9 5DN Proposal : Application for a Non-Material Amendment To Roof

Alterations Approved On 7th March 2019 Under Application No 18/01178/FUL And To Comprise Change To External Materials And Windows

Applicant : Mr Aylott Application No : 19/00279/LDC Decision : LDC Part Permitted

Part Refused Location : Hillcrest Church Road Hockley Proposal : Application for a certificate of lawfulness for a proposed

single storey rear and side extensions with roof alteration of hip-to-gable and insert dormers

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Jacobs 1 That part of the proposed development which is considered to NOT be

lawful and for which a certificate of lawful use or development is REFUSED is;

i ii.) part hip-to-gable roof alteration

Reason for decision (ii): Having regard to this assessment of the limitations and restrictions applicable to development permitted by Class B it would appear that the proposal cannot constitute ‘permitted development’ under the provisions of Schedule 2 Part 1, Class B of the Town and Country Planning (General permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) and therefore, planning permission is required in this case due to the failure to comply with B.1 part (d).

Application No : 19/00313/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 14 Olivers Crescent Great Wakering SS3 0ES Proposal : Front porch extension and garage Applicant : Mrs Jackie Rudd Application No : 19/00336/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning

Permission Location : Brick House Stambridge Road Stambridge Proposal : Proposed attached garage to existing outbuilding Applicant : Mr Peter Hills Reason(s) for Refusal

1. The application site is located in the Metropolitan Green Belt according to

the Rochford District Council Local Development Framework Allocations Map (2014). The proposal by way of further excessively adding to the existing garage/outbuilding would represent a further incremental disproportionate increase in size of the built form in relation to the dwelling. If allowed the proposal would further urbanise the site given the extent of the existing outbuilding to which the proposal would be attached

of 25

and given the outbuilding to the very rear of the site’s curtilage. If allowed the proposal would prove detrimental to the openness of that part of the Green Belt in which the site is situated.

2. The proposed garage would cause harm to the setting and significance of

the heritage asset “Brick House” which is Grade II Listed. The cumulative expansion of the outbuilding would detract from the prominence of the listed building in terms of footprint and scale.



Location : Mallaig Lower Road Hockley Proposal : Lawful development certificate for a proposed single storey

side extension Applicant : Mr & Mrs Wortley Application No : 19/00439/NMA Decision : Refused Non Material

Amendment Location : 14 Goldsworthy Drive Great Wakering Essex Proposal : Non-material amendment to approved application

18/00410/FUL dated 15th August 2018 - for insertion of 2no small windows to the side elevation

Applicant : Miss Jane Ellis

1. It is considered that the proposed additional two windows to the western flank elevation could not be considered to be a non-material amendment to the original planning permission given that they would result in a noticeably different change to the extension approved which could impact on the amenity of neighbours and as a consequence the proposed change cannot be considered to amount to a non-material amendment.

Application No : 19/00445/NMA Decision : Application Permitted Location : 10 Temple Way Rayleigh Proposal : Application for a Non-Material Amendment to Application

Reference 18/00975/FUL: Front and Rear Pitched Roof Dormers and Rear Rooflights to Create Rooms in Roof

Applicant : Mr And Mrs Marsh Application No : 19/00459/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful


Location : Northcroft New Park Road Hockley

of 25

Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for a Proposed Extensions - Proposed side and rear extensions labelled 01 and 02 on the proposed floor plan. Proposed rear extension labelled 03 on the proposed floor plan.

Applicant : Mr & Mrs L Offord

of 25



Location : 79 Clyde Crescent Rayleigh SS6 7SX Proposal : Application for a certificate of lawfulness for a proposed

rooms in roof, hip to gable extended dormer to rear

Applicant : Mr Fernando Garagorri Application No : 19/00475/LDC Decision : Refuse Lawful


Location : 19 Abbey Close Hullbridge Essex Proposal : Application for a Certificate of Lawfulness for Proposed

Single Storey Rear Extension Applicant : Mr M Livings 1. The proposed rear extension would fall to be considered under part (g) of

Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) which requires that conditions as set out in A.4 are met. No application has been submitted as required by the conditions at A.4 and consequently the proposal cannot be confirmed as constituting permitted development.

Application No : 19/00488/NMA Decision : Application Permitted Location : 10 King Henrys Drive Rochford Essex Proposal : Non material amendment application on approved

application: 18/00332/FUL dated 22/06/2019 Two Storey Front Extension and First Floor Rear Extension - lower the pitch of the roof by raising the side walls by 300mm

Applicant : Mr Andrew Wilks Application No : 19/00493/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning

Permission Location : Land Adjacent 14 Hambro Close Rayleigh Proposal : Proposed one two storey building containing two self

contained apartments Applicant : Rochford District Council Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The provision of visitor parking spaces failed to meet the standards set out in

policy

of 25

Application No : 19/00497/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 24 Teignmouth Drive Rayleigh SS6 9PF Proposal : Two Storey Side Extension Applicant : Mr Stone Application No : 19/00517/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Yard Adjacent 44 Purdeys Way Rochford Proposal : Construction of five light industrial warehouse units Applicant : Mr Martin James Application No : 19/00526/DOC Decision : Discharge Of

Conditions Location : 89 Rayleigh Avenue Eastwood SS9 5DL Proposal : Discharge of condition no 8 on approved application

16/01071/OUT: Outline application to demolish existing dwelling and outbuilding and construct 2 no. four bedroomed dwellings, 1 no. five bedroomed dwelling and 1 no. six bedroomed dwelling, all with Garages and Amenity Areas

Applicant : Mr Derek Frost - Frost Homes UK Limited Application No : 19/00551/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 64 Daws Heath Road Rayleigh SS6 7RN Proposal : Two storey front extensions Applicant : Mr & Mrs Flowers Application No : 19/00558/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful


Location : 17 Southbourne Grove Hockley SS5 5EB Proposal : Application for a certificate of lawfulness for a proposed hip

to gable conversion with new rooms in roof and rear facing dormer. New Porch extension

Applicant : Mr Matt Koppit Application No : 19/00567/LDC Decision : LDC Part Permitted

Part Refused Location : Ayrshire The Chase Ashingdon Proposal : Application for a certificate of lawfulness for a proposed

single storey side extension, rear dormer and detached garage

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Cox That part of the proposed development which is considered to not be lawful and a certificate of lawful use of development will NOT BE ISSUED is; Proposed side extension, rear dormer and front porch. REASON:

of 25

1 The proposed side extension would fail to comply with Class A part (j)(iii) and (ja). The proposed front porch would fail to comply with Class D parts (b) and (c). The proposed rear dormer would fail to comply with Class B part (d).

Application No : 19/00569/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 32 Holly Tree Gardens Rayleigh SS6 7BG Proposal : Single storey rear extension with roof lantern. Extend patio

area and construct detached storage building. (Alterations to roof with dormer shown on plans approved under 19/00139/LDC)

Applicant : Miss Ella Golding Application No : 19/00570/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful


Location : 31 Leicester Avenue Rochford SS4 1JL Proposal : Application for a certificate of lawfulness for proposed hip to

gable rear dormer loft conversion, rooflights to front elevation and removal of chimney.

Applicant : Russell Dynamos Application No : 19/00573/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful


Location : 47 Fairview Crescent Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Application for a certificate of lawfulness for proposed

single storey mono-pitched roof rear extension Applicant : Mr Melvyn Lush Application No : 19/00580/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning

Permission Location : Land East Of Little Orchard Cottage Barling Road Barling

Magna Proposal : Erection of single storey stable block and hardstanding for

horses and change of use from agricultural land for land for use for stables

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Dickens 1 The application, by way of the proposed grazing area of only some 0.07

hectares, would fall considerably short of the 0.4 hectares per stable, contrary to policy requirements of part (ii) of Policy DM15 of the Rochford District Council Development Management Plan 2014. Whilst the site benefits from having immediately accessible bridleways and is within a rural location which could provide an alternative to the open space provided. Given that the horses proposed on the site are not ridden, it is not considered that this would be enough to counteract the significant shortfall of the grazing area provided. This application would therefore be contrary to part (ii) of Policy DM15 of the Rochford District Council Development Management Plan 2014.

of 25


Permission Location : Pyne Cottage Trenders Avenue Rayleigh Proposal : Part two/part single storey rear extension

Applicant : Mr Daniel Costen Reason(s) for Refusal

1. Policy DM17 of the Development Management Plan requires that

extensions to dwellings in the Green Belt result in no more than a 25% increase in internal floorspace over that of the original dwelling. The existing extension to the dwellinghouse currently exceeds the 25% limit and the proposed extension would result in additions significantly exceeding the 25 percent limit. The proposal would result in disproportionate additions and amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, contrary to Policy DM17 which would be harmful by definition and would be harmful to the openness of the Green Belt. There are considered to be no very special circumstances

Application No : 19/00583/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 5 Pemberton Field South Fambridge SS4 3BF Proposal : Two Storey Front Extension Applicant : Mr Jeffries Application No : 19/00585/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 1 Elizabeth Avenue Rayleigh SS6 7SH Proposal : Part two/part single storey front, side and rear extension

incorporating garage Applicant : Mr T Pasi Application No : 19/00590/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 7 Southview Road Hockley SS5 5DX Proposal : Construct hip to gable roof extension, flat roofed rear

dormer, single storey rear extension and front porch Applicant : Miss Megan Marney Application No : 19/00594/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning

Permission Location : 25 Hawkwell Road Hockley SS5 4DD Proposal : Demolish existing garage, build new garage, extend roof to

form gable, provide dormers to front and rear, single storey and first floor rear extensions

Applicant : Mr & Mrs S and J Richards

of 25

Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The proposed first-floor rear extension and rear dormer would be significant in

size and result in incongruous, overly dominant additions which would also be of visually unattractive design; the extensions would be out of character with the existing dwelling and would cause harm to visual amenity. The scale of the proposed first floor addition would breach the 45 degree test in SPD2 and would be considered excessive in depth with regard to No. 27 resulting in unacceptable overshadowing. The proposal would be contrary to the parts (x), (ix) and (xi) of policy DM1 of the Development Management Plan.

2. The proposed front dormer incorporating a linking flat roof is considered to be of poor design and the size of the dormer is also significant, with minimal roof verges such that it would appear overly dominant in the roof plane. The dormer would be of poor design and appear as a visually unattractive feature of the dwelling to the detriment of visual amenity contrary to guidance in SPD2 and the Essex Design Guide and part (ix) of policy DM1 of the Development Management Plan.

Application No : 19/00597/LDC Decision : Refuse Lawful


Location : 46 Leslie Road Rayleigh SS6 8PB Proposal : Application for a lawful development certificate for a

proposed single storey extension to the side of the house Applicant : Mr Cox Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The proposed side extension would not comply with part (e) (ii) of Class A of the GPDO (as amended) and therefore does not constitute permitted development under Section 192 of the Town and Country Planning Act (as amended).



Location : 74 Hullbridge Road Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Application for a certificate of lawfulness for a proposed first

floor rear extension Applicant : Mr P Crosley

of 25


Permission Location : Royston Stambridge Road Stambridge Proposal : Rear Conservatory Applicant : Mr P Hendy Reason(s) for Refusal

1. Policy DM17 of the Council’s Development Management Document

provides that for dwellings located in the Green Belt, the total size of a dwelling as extended, including any extension which may have previously been added, will not normally exceed the original floor space by more than 25%. Given the scale of the proposed extension and the existing additions to which it would join, the proposal is considered to be excessive, rather than reasonable, resulting in a substantial change in the size of the original property and a substantial increase in bulk, contrary to Policy DM17 and detrimental to the openness of the Green Belt. The proposal is thus considered to represent a disproportionate addition contrary to paragraph 13 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and is thus considered inappropriate development within the Green Belt. No very special circumstances have been put forward to outweigh harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and it is not considered that any such circumstances exist.

Application No : 19/00603/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 115 Daws Heath Road Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Retain two storey rear extension with roof lantern Applicant : Mr And Mrs Reid Application No : 19/00606/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning

Permission Location : 51 Highams Road Hockley SS5 4DF Proposal : Proposed two storey front, side and rear extension and

alterations to both first floor and all elevations for additional living space

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Smart Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The proposed two storey extension and first floor front extension, by reason of

its siting, scale and bulk would create an unduly dominant and incongruous form of development that does not relate well to and would have a detrimental impact upon the host dwelling and the streetscene. Therefore, the development would be contrary to policies DM1 and DM3 of the Development Management Plan and the NPPF.

2 The proposed development, sited close to the boundary and with a height of

7m would overshadow the garden of and would have an over-dominant impact upon the outlook enjoyed by the occupiers of the adjacent property, no.49 Highams Road. Therefore, the development would be contrary to policies DM1 and DM3 of the Development Management Plan.

of 25


Permission Location : 119 Springwater Road Eastwood SS9 5BW Proposal : Single Storey Side Extension & raising the ridge height to

incorporate Loft Conversion with Rear Dormer. Applicant : Ms S Leech Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The proposed alterations to the roof would result in an incongruous design,

the unbalancing of the semi-detached pair with the proposed higher eaves and ridge line would appear out of place in the street scene with the dwelling appearing distinctly top heavy and out of character with the host dwelling and the surrounding area contrary to parts (ix) and (xi) of policy DM1.

Application No : 19/00610/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 67A Branksome Avenue Hockley SS5 5PG Proposal : Erect part single, part two rear extension and single storey

side extension. Erect first floor front gable ends and dormer window. Lay out balcony. Convert garage into habitable accommodation and alter front elevation (Amended proposal)

Applicant : NJ Carpentry Ltd Application No : 19/00614/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 1 Belgrave Close Rayleigh SS6 9GD Proposal : Erect front porch and single storey rear extension and erect

outbuilding Applicant : Mr Brooks Application No : 19/00615/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 27 Wedgwood Way Ashingdon SS4 3AS Proposal : Erect single storey front and side extension incorporating

front canopy Applicant : Mr & Mrs W & S Collings Application No : 19/00619/DOC Decision : Discharge Of

Conditions Location : Shangri-La West Caravan Park Kingsmans Farm Road

Hullbridge Proposal : Discharge conditions 4 (surface water drainage scheme ), 5

(tree impact assessment), 6 (foul water drainage) and 7 (Unilateral Undertaking - Financial Contribution) attached to planning permission 18/00285/FUL

Applicant : Mr M Annis

of 25

Application No : 19/00624/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 14A Albert Road Rayleigh SS6 8HN Proposal : Single storey side extension Applicant : Mr & Mrs Jones Application No : 19/00625/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 16 Central Avenue Ashingdon SS4 3BQ Proposal : Single storey side extension Applicant : Mr & Mrs Michael Borthwick Application No : 19/00630/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 65 Philbrick Crescent West Rayleigh SS6 9HX Proposal : Demolish existing rear extension and existing first floor

bedrooms. Erect single storey rear extension and create first floor and convert garage into habitable accommodation

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Beaney Application No : 19/00633/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 20A Oak Walk Hockley SS5 5AR Proposal : Convert garage into habitable accommodation and alter

front elevation Applicant : Ms V Osborn Application No : 19/00634/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 20A Oak Walk Hockley SS5 5AR Proposal : Extend existing dormer Applicant : Ms V Osborn Application No : 19/00649/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 19 Mount Avenue Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Alter hipped roof to form gable end and erect front and rear

flat roof dormers and erect single storey rear extension Applicant : Miss Laura Jaggers Application No : 19/00636/LDC Decision : Refuse Lawful


Location : Glenville Rayleigh Downs Road Rayleigh Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for a

Proposed siting of a Mobile Home Applicant : Miss Kerry Walsh Reason(s) for Refusal 1 The proposed mobile home would not exert the mobility needed to meet the

definition of a caravan, within the meaning of the Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960 (hereafter 'the 1960 act').

of 25

2 The drawings submitted may exceed the limits of the dimensions stated under

Section 29 of the 1960 Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act but this cannot be fully determined due to insufficient drawings submitted with the application that are not to scale.

2 The proposed mobile home would not be incidental to the dwellinghouse and

would not constitute operational development. The proposal would therefore constitute development within the meaning of Section 55 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and planning permission would be required.

Application No : 19/00650/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 74 High Road Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Convert garage to habitable room. Applicant : Mr And Mrs Bloxham Application No : 19/00645/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Beecroft House Lambourne Hall Road Canewdon Proposal : Proposed contemporary outbuilding to be used as a games

room. Applicant : Mr Rob Webb - Bearded Builders UK Application No : 19/00654/NMA Decision : Refuse Planning

Permission Location : 6 Langham Drive Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Application for a non-material amendments comprising

enlargement towards front, change to roof design and add window to front to single storey side addition approved on 22nd June 2018 under application ref:18/00423/FUL

Applicant : Mr B Jones Reason(s) for Refusal

1 It is considered that the revisions would not be non-material amendment in so far as the proposed changes involve a significant proportional increase in the footprint of the extension and change to the roof form which would be noticeably different to the development approved and could have the potential to be considered differently in respect of relevant planning policy.

Application No : 19/00656/LDC Decision : Application Permitted Location : 27 Broadlands Road Hockley SS5 5DT Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for a

Proposed use loft conversion with hip to gable roof extension and rear dormer

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Wall

of 25

Application No : 19/00657/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission

Location : 8 Kenilworth Gardens Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Construct Front Porch With Extended Roof Over Bay

Window and First Floor Rear Extension Applicant : Mr Paul Topp Reason(s) for Refusal

1. The proposed first floor rear extension, by virtue of the flat roofed form and

impact on neighbouring dwellings through overshadowing, would not achieve a high standard of design contrary to parts (ix), (x) and (xi) of Policy DM1 of Rochford District Council's Development Management Plan (2014), Policy CP1 of the Council's Core Strategy (2011) as well as Rochford District Council's Supplementary Planning Document 2 Housing Design (January 2007).

Application No : 19/00661/LDC Decision : LDC Part Permitted

Part Refused Location : 129 Rectory Road Hawkwell SS5 4LL Proposal : Lawful development certificate for proposed to erect two

side extensions Applicant : Mr & Mrs Kern 1 That part of the proposed development which is considered NOT to be

lawful and for which a certificate of lawful use or development is NOT ISSUED is; Northern flank side extension

The reason that the northern flank side extension would not be permitted development is that the extension would fall contrary to part (e) of Class A of the GPDO (as amended).

Application No : 19/00664/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 10 Monksford Drive Hullbridge Essex Proposal : Two storey side extension Applicant : Miss Buckfield Application No : 19/00667/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful


Location : 131 Grove Road Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for

proposed loft conversion Applicant : Mr Lewis Brennan

of 25

Application No : 19/00668/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 131 Grove Road Rayleigh SS6 8RD Proposal : Demolition of existing detached garage to rear. Proposed

single storey side and rear extension including new open front porch

Applicant : Mr Lewis Brennan Application No : 19/00672/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 135 Hockley Road Rayleigh SS6 8BQ Proposal : Proposed single storey rear extension. Applicant : Mr & Mrs Collis Application No : 19/00676/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 49 Ashingdon Heights Ashingdon Essex Proposal : Construct single storey rear extension Applicant : Mr & Mrs Hill Application No : 19/00679/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Birches Hall Road Rochford Proposal : Proposed second floor rear dormer and alterations to

existing first floor rear dormer. Applicant : Mr D Thomas Application No : 19/00683/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval of

Details Not Required Location : Northcroft New Park Road Hockley Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear

Extension. Projection 8m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 3m, Maximum Height 4m

Applicant : Mr & Mrs L Offord Application No : 19/00681/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 11 Ashworths Ashingdon SS4 3EF Proposal : Pitched roof dormer at first floor front elevation; new

window at ground floor to replace garage door; conversion of integral garage and new bi-fold doors to rear.

Applicant : Mr A Joy Application No : 19/00686/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Land North Of 137 Green Lane East Of Flemings Farm

Road Eastwood Proposal : Proposed Agricultural Building for Use as Hay Store Applicant : Mrs Ruth Wright

of 25

Application No : 19/00687/LDC Decision : Refuse Lawful Development Certificate

Location : 361 Eastwood Road Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Application for a lawful development certificate for a

proposed rear extension Applicant : Mr M Bolton Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The proposed rear extension would fail part (f) and fall to be considered under part (g) of Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) which requires that conditions as set out in A.4 are met. No application has been submitted as required by the conditions at A.4 and consequently the proposal cannot constitute permitted development.

Application No : 19/00688/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 356 Little Wakering Road Barling Magna Essex Proposal : Extend rear dormer to existing loft conversion and add

gable wall Applicant : Mr M Whitworth Application No : 19/00691/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 26 London Hill Rayleigh SS6 7HP Proposal : Construct single storey rear extension and install new

windows to existing elevation. Applicant : Mrs Tanya Gregory Application No : 19/00693/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval

Required - Refused Location : 3 Warren Close Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear

Extension. Projection 4m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 2.48m, Maximum Height 3.518m

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Treanor 1 In accordance with the provisions of Class A, Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the

Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015, I hereby confirm that Prior Approval is REFUSED as the proposed rear extension would not comply with the conditions, limitations or restrictions applicable to development permitted by Class A which exceeds the limits in paragraph A.1(j) but is provided for by paragraph A.1(ja). This is because the extension would attach to an existing single storey rear/side extension and when taken together would form a wraparound extension that would have a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse.

of 25

Application No : 19/00694/DOC Decision : Discharge Of Conditions

Location : 56 Greensward Lane Hockley SS5 5HA Proposal : Discharge of Conditions 3, 7 and 11 of planning permission

19/00098/FUL dated 6th June 2019 Applicant : Mr Styles Application No : 19/00698/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 8 Park Gardens Hawkwell SS5 4HE Proposal : Single storey flat roof rear extension, and alter flat roof to

incorporate a front porch roof above front entrance, alter fenestration and install timber cladding.

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Holcombe Application No : 19/00699/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 8 Park Gardens Hawkwell SS5 4HE Proposal : Single storey flat roof rear extension, first floor side

extension over existing garage, and alter flat roof to incorporate a front porch roof above front entrance alter fenestration and addition of timber effect cladding and new render.

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Holcombe Application No : 19/00702/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 69 Upway Rayleigh SS6 8AA Proposal : Proposed ground floor rear extension with alterations to

existing ground floor flat roofs. Conversion of garage to habitable space.

Applicant : Ms M Huxen And Mr C Groombridge Application No : 19/00704/DOC Decision : Discharge Of

Conditions Location : The Old Parsonage Ironwell Lane Hawkwell Proposal : Application to discharge condition no. 3 ( external

materials) to development comprising part single/part two storey extension and detached garage approved on 26th April 2019 under planning ref: 19/00126/FUL

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Bill Carter Application No : 19/00707/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 4 St Andrews Road Rochford Essex Proposal : Rebuild oak frame flat roof and skylight Applicant : Mr John Lowrie

of 25

Application No : 19/00710/DOC Decision : Discharge Of

Conditions Location : 3 Ashworths Ashingdon Essex Proposal : Application to Discharge of Condition 3 (external materials)

to first floor front extension approved on 16th July 2019 under application ref : 19/00472/FUL

Applicant : Mr & Mrs K & E Peters Application No : 19/00711/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval of

Details Not Required Location : 12 Daws Heath Road Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear

Extension. Projection 5m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 3m, Maximum Height 4m

Applicant : Andrea Fallis Application No : 19/00714/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval of

Details Not Required Location : 24 The Bramleys Rochford Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear

Extension. Projection 4.5m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 3m, Maximum Height 4m

Applicant : Daniel Grimwood Application No : 19/00719/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval

Required - Refused Location : 19 Hawkwell Chase Hawkwell Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear

Extension. Projection 4.5m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 2.85m, Maximum Height 3.4m

Applicant : Mr Adrian Eaves 1 In accordance with the provisions of Class A, Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the

Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015, I hereby confirm that Prior Approval is REFUSED as the proposed development does not comply with the conditions, limitations or restrictions applicable to development permitted by Class A which exceeds the limits in paragraph A.1(e), (j) and (ja). This is because the proposed extension would attach to an existing two storey side extension forming a wraparound extension that would front a highway contrary to part (e) with a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse contrary to parts (j) and (ja).

of 25

Application No : 19/00718/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 20 Eastview Drive Rayleigh SS6 9NY Proposal : Two storey side extension and additional front dormer

window and single storey rear extension with roof lanterns Applicant : Mr Matthew Lyon Application No : 19/00729/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 51 Hamilton Gardens Hockley SS5 5BX Proposal : Single storey rear extension Applicant : Mr Kieran Western Application No : 19/00757/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval Refused Location : 1 Highfield Crescent Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear

Extension. Projection 5.5m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 2.7m, Maximum Height 3.2m

Applicant : Mr David Hopper 1 In accordance with the provisions of Class A, Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015, I hereby confirm that Prior Approval is REFUSED as the proposed development does not comply with the conditions, limitations or restrictions applicable to development permitted by Class A which exceeds the limits in paragraph A.1(j) and (ja). The proposed rear extension would also extend off part of an original side wall. As the proposed extension would be greater than half the width of the original building, it would not be lawful. It will therefore be necessary to apply for Planning Permission for the extension proposed as it cannot be constructed lawfully under Permitted Development Rights. Application No : 19/00763/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval of

Details Not Required Location : The Lodge Loftmans Farm Creeksea Ferry Road Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear

Extension. Projection 6m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 3.15m, Maximum Height 3.3m

Applicant : Mr Phil Kingston Application No : 19/00761/DOC Decision : Discharge Of

Conditions Location : 42 Golden Cross Road Ashingdon SS4 3DG Proposal : Discharge of condition 9 on approved application

19/00208/FUL: Demolish existing dwelling and construct pair of semi detached dwellings

Applicant : Hilton Homes

of 25

Application No : 19/00775/NMA Decision : Refused Non Material

Amendment Location : 2 Pemberton Field South Fambridge Rochford Proposal : Application for a non-material amendment following a grant

of planning permission 19/00505/FUL dated 12th August 2019 - Allow to provide terrace balcony to maximise expansive views over.

Applicant : Mr & Mrs Sexton

1 It is considered that the revisions would not be non-material amendments in so far as the proposed changes involve a significant proportional increase in the depth and width of the balcony which would be noticeably different to the development approved and would have the potential to cause harm to the amenity of neighbouring residents. It could have the potential to be considered differently in respect of relevant planning policy.

2

Application No : 19/00819/NMA Decision : Application Permitted Location : 3 The Westerings Hawkwell SS5 4NX Proposal : Application for a non-material amendment following a grant

of planning permission 19/00425/FUL dated 17/07/2019 - High level port-hole window included to rear single storey extension.

Applicant : Mr Lewis

PLANNING DECISIONS September 2019 Discharge … › sites › default › files › September...an...

Documents

Transcript of PLANNING DECISIONS September 2019 Discharge … › sites › default › files › September...an...