PLANNING APPLICATION FOR A RENEWABLE … Ash Silo – the fly ash silo framework stores the ... Fire...

Rolton Kilbride Hams Hall Renewable Energy Centre, Faraday Avenue, Coleshill, Warwickshire Statement of Community Consultation

03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173

CONTENTS:

Page No:

1. INRODUCTION 2

2. THE PLANNING APPLICATION 4

3. PROMOTING THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN CONSULTATION 8

4. PUBLIC EXHIBITION EVENT DETAILS AND FEEDBACK 11

5. PROJECT TEAM DESIGN RESPONSE TO PUBLIC, STAKEHOLDER AND WCC

CONSULTATION FEEDBACK 14

6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 17

APPENDIX 1: SITE LOCATION PLAN 19

APPENDIX 2: SITE LAYOUT 20

APPENDIX 3: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY 21

APPENDIX 4: STAKEHOLDER MEETING PRESENTATION MATERIAL 22

APPENDIX 5: LEAFLET DROP 23

APPENDIX 6: MEDIA ALERT 24

APPENDIX 7: EXHIBITION MATERIAL 25

APPENDIX 8: HAMS HALL WEBSITE PAGES 26

APPENDIX 9: COMPLETED QUESIONNAIRES 27

APPENDIX 10: COMPLETED LEAFLET DROP FEEDBACK FORMS 28


02 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 2

1. INRODUCTION

1.1 This document provides a statement of community consultation in support of an

application for planning permission for a Renewable Energy Centre (REC) at Hams

Hall, Faraday Avenue, Coleshill, Warwickshire.

1.2 The Renewable Energy Centre (REC) will employ an Advanced Conversion

Technology (ACT) (gasification) which is supported by Government and is part of a

number of renewable technologies being deployed in the UK. ACT/Gasification is a

process to generate power and heat from Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) together with

other pre-treated wastes. RDF is a product which is pre-treated then shredded,

dehydrated and/or compressed from municipal solid waste and industrial and

commercial waste and when heated to very high temperatures breaks down to

provide a gas which is utilised in a boiler to create steam which drives a steam

turbine to produce electricity and heat. It is a clean, modern and hi-tech approach

to producing energy, with a proven track record.

1.3 The development will have the capacity to process up to approximately 150,000

tonnes of waste per annum. As well as the RDF the feed stock will include using

residual commercial and industrial waste (CIW) together with an element of

municipal solid waste (MSW) i.e. residual waste where all the practicable recycling

has been completed. The plant will not accept hazardous or clinical waste.

1.4 The proposals include:

Generation of up to 14.5 megawatts gross of electricity - the equivalent of

powering over 26,000 homes on a continual basis

The plant is capable of accepting 150,000 tonnes of waste per annum which

would otherwise go to landfill

The main building is approximately 24 metres tall and will have a single,

taller chimney stack of 52m

Landscaping proposals will be included within the scheme along the site

frontage onto Faraday Avenue to enhance the existing environment by

planting trees.

1.5 This statement of community consultation provides detailed information regarding

the pre-application consultation, which has been undertaken prior to the

submission of the planning application seeking permission for the development.


02 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 3

1.6 The role of the pre-application process is not to seek to persuade or cajole people

into supporting a project or application. Rather, it is to provide appropriate

opportunities and environments within which people can communicate their

concerns, or aspirations about the development, and have those issues and

aspirations recorded and reported to those who are engaged in devising and

designing the development project, or are directly involved in the decision-making

process to enable them to address concerns wherever possible.


02 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 4

2. THE PLANNING APPLICATION

2.1 The planning application is being submitted to Warwickshire County Council as the

relevant Planning Authority for the development site.

Site Context

2.2 The Application Site comprises 1.96 ha of land located within the Hams Hall

Distribution Centre, off Faraday Avenue in the Coleshill area of Warwickshire.

APPENDIX 1: PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT

2.3 The Hams Hall Distribution Park extends to the east, south and south-west of the

Application Site, with industrial units immediately to the east and south beyond

Faraday Avenue. Notable (large-scale) occupiers of the Hams Hall Distribution Park

include a BMW Plant, Sainsbury’s Distribution Centre and Wincanton Group

warehouse to the east, the Hanson/Thermalite block-making facility to the north-

east and the DHL Exel Supply Chain to the south. Immediately to the west of the

Application Site is an electricity sub-station beyond which is a car parking facility

associated with Birmingham Airport. To the north, the land is occupied by further

hardstanding, the northern extent of which falls beyond the allocated industrial

estate and within Green Belt.

2.4 The nearest residential properties are Orchard Cottage and Newlands Farm located

circa 540m to the west and those adjacent to the Church of St John the Baptist

circa 680m to the north-east. The nearest settlements include Lea Marston circa

1km to the north, Whiteacre Heath circa 1.4km to the east, Water Orton circa

1.5km to the south-west, Curdworth circa 1.7km to the west and the northern

extent of Coleshill circa 1.4km to the south, all of which are separated from the

Application Site by a combination of industrial units, the railway line, tree belts,

River Tame and/or the strategic highway network including the M42 motorway.

The Proposed Development

2.5 The site has been chosen for a number of reasons; including:

It is located within an existing industrial site

No statutory designated areas within the site

A sustainable location with good transport links

Close to other local businesses where power could be supplied to them if

required.


02 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 5

2.6 The Proposed Development includes a Renewable Energy Centre (REC). There will

also be a small number of ancillary buildings and structures to support the REC.

APPENDIX 2: SITE LAYOUT

2.7 The REC is capable of accepting approximately 150,000 tonnes per annum of

Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) (a waste product that following pre-treatment is

shredded, dehydrated and/ or compressed) as well as an element of residual

commercial and industrial waste (CIW) together with an element of municipal solid

waste (MSW) i.e. residual waste where all the practicable recycling has been

completed. The facility will not accept hazardous or hazardous clinical waste.

2.8 The electricity produced from the REC will have a capacity to produce a gross

14.5MW of electricity. The technology employed by Hams Hall Energy will involve

a two-stage system, which initially gasifies the waste to produce synthetic gas. This

gas is then transferred to a second stage where it burns more efficiently as a fuel.

The process allows for efficient control of emissions and improved performance

generally as an energy solution.

2.9 The proposed REC is made up of the following principal elements:

A main building – this will house the majority of the process plant and will

have a number of silos to the rear and a flue stack to the east of the building,

all waste material will be unloaded inside the building. At its highest point,

the main body of the building will be 24m high and 87.96m long x 72.7m

wide with a floor area of 5725m2. The flue stack contains a walk around

platform for continual air quality monitoring access and consists of a metal

framework. The stack will have a height of 52m and a diameter of 2.8m.

Waste Storage Bunker - Wastes are deposited into an 8m deep waste

bunker with a capacity of 820m3 (which has a maximum of 4 days of waste

storage thus complying with fire regulations and stopping build-up of heat

from waste gasses) where shredding and separating takes place and any

ferrous material is taken out;

Turbine Room – this will be a smaller separate building 15.6m high, with

a base of 30m x 11m. A short section of pipe line will connect the main

building and the turbine generator building;

Air cooled condenser fans – have a height of 23.4m with a footprint of

39.62 x 15.76m;

Bottom Ash bunker – the bottom ash is stored in a bunker measuring 10m

x 12m x 5m with a capacity of 600m3. This material is inert and can be


02 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 6

reused as an aggregate or used for an engineering material in landfill. It

complies with current European legislation;

Fly Ash Silo – the fly ash silo framework stores the residue from the flue

gas cleaning system and measures 10.5m x 5.15m and 19.5m high. The

ash is removed in a safe manner by attaching an umbilical hose to a tanker

and can be either reused /recovered or disposed of at licensed landfills. The

handling, storage, treatment and reuse/disposal of this material is highly

regulated;

Fire Water Tank - a fire water tank would be included to the south of REC

building. The tank has a 17m diameter and a height of 6.75m with a 1 million

litre capacity;

Pump Room – the pump house is next to the fire water tank and has a

height of 3.2m with a footprint of 6.09m x 4.59m; and

Technical / Control room and Workshop – will be located within the east

side of the main building.

2.10 In addition, the external site areas will include:

Two weighbridges (both in and out);

Site entrance and circulation roads;

18 car parking spaces including 2 disabled bays;

Provision for cycling spaces.

2.11 The REC will bring a range of benefits and environmental improvements to the site

and its surroundings as well as social benefits; including:

Proven technology with outstanding operational and environmental

performance and very low emissions;

Conversion of non-recyclable, non-hazardous waste into renewable energy,

displacing landfill and fossil fuels;

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions;

Compliance with Government policy and the EU Waste Framework Directive

to provide sustainable, renewable energy production close to use;

Job creation across a variety of skills and levels of expertise with

employment opportunities for local people;

Reusing and transforming an existing industrial site and enhancing with

landscape planting;


02 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 7

Production of lower cost renewable energy for local businesses with

connections to local energy users via underground cable; and

Clear progression in the transition to a low-carbon economy with grid carbon

offset.

2.12 To enable the LPA, statutory consultees, other interested parties and local residents

to make informed comments and decisions about the proposed REC at Hams Hall,

Coleshill, the planning application is accompanied by the following documents:

Application Form

Schedule of Drawings

Planning Statement

Design and Access Statement

Environmental Statement


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 8

3. PROMOTING THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN CONSULTATION

3.1 The Applicant has engaged in a series of public consultation and promotional events

to include and inform the local and wider community of the development proposals

and understand any concerns, seeking to address where possible. The steps

undertaken to date are summarised below:

Development of communications strategy

3.2 Stakeholder engagement and activity strategy – The communications agency

CubanEight prepared a detailed analysis of relevant stakeholders, elected

councillors, parish Councils, other developers and media. This was used to devise

a programme of individual briefings, community meetings, public events and media

alerts, to maximise the distribution of information to the public and allow for

dialogue and regular updates via a dedicated website.

3.3 The communications timeplan initially focussed on Warwickshire County Council

and North Warwickshire Borough Council elected members, followed by Lea

Marston and Water Orton Parish Councils and the wider public and the media.

Meetings and information were also offered to relevant stakeholders.

APPENDIX 3: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY

Activity

Stakeholder meeting – On 3rd May 2016, Rolton Kilbride and communications

agency CubanEight met with four key stakeholders to give an overview and

presentation of the proposals. They were: Mr Jeff Brown, the Head of Planning at

North Warwickshire Borough Council; Councillor Joan Lea, County councillor and

Borough councillor; Councillor David Reilly, Borough councillor and Chair of Lea

Marston Parish Council and Peter Fowler, former County councillor. Questions were

asked about air quality, the height and visibility of the stack and about the public

consultation event.

APPENDIX 4: STAKEHOLDER MEETING PRESENTATION MATERIAL

3.4 Leaflet drop – Leaflets were sent out on 27th and 28th April 2016 to residents

within a 2km zone of the site as well as those businesses within the Hams Hall

Distribution park area. This amounted to circa. 1,000 households and 200

businesses. The leaflets gave an overview of the project, invited the public to the

exhibition and encouraged postal feedback.

APPENDIX 5: LEAFLET DROP


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 9

3.5 Media Alert – On 29th April 2016, in advance of the public exhibition, a press notice

was released to raise awareness of the development proposals. This was issued to

the Coleshill Gazette, Coleshill Post, Nuneaton News, Rugby Advertiser and BBC

Coventry and Warwickshire website.

APPENDIX 6: MEDIA ALERT

3.6 Public Exhibition Event - On Wednesday 4th May 2016 (2.30-8.30pm), a public

outreach event was organised at the Lea Marston Hotel. On hand to explain the

project were:

Project Developer - Rolton Kilbride

Associate Environmental Planner - Pegasus Group

Principal and Consultant Air Quality Specialists - AQC

Senior Transport Planner - Curtins

One Technology Specialist – Energos

APPENDIX 7: EXHIBITION MATERIAL

Additional Stakeholder Consultation

3.7 Project website – a project website (hamshallenergy.co.uk) was created to

provide stakeholders with further sources of information about the REC. The

website includes tabs about who the project team are; local benefits; frequently

asked questions, and includes a contact page. The website is regularly updated, as

are the frequently asked questions.

APPENDIX 8: HAMS HALL WEBSITE PAGES

3.8 Statutory consultees - In addition to public community participation, the project

team consulted with various stakeholders during the development stage of the

project. Statutory Consultees included:

Warwickshire County Council;

North Warwickshire Borough Council;

Environment Agency

Natural England.

3.9 Pre-Application Advice - The Applicant engaged in a pre-application consultation

process with Warwickshire County Council (WCC) prior to the submission of the

planning application. The advice received was broadly supportive of the proposals

in principle, including guidance setting out the planning policy context that an

application would be judged against and an indication of the documentation


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 10

necessary to support an application. The pre-application comments received can

be found within the Planning Statement that accompanies this planning application.

3.10 Other feedback – The project website included both email and phone contact

details. As of 3rd June 2016, no enquiries have been made.

Monitoring and Evaluation

3.11 Throughout the consultation period, the activity and feedback have been constantly

monitored and evaluated to inform further activity. This ensures that the

communications allow for appropriate information to be disseminated, specific

concerns to be addressed and to ensure that stakeholders have access to the

correct information in a timely manner.

3.12 The Applicant is continuing to offer update briefings to all relevant councillors and

Parish Councils, and will continue to liaise with local media to publicise the

submission of the planning application.


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 11

4. PUBLIC EXHIBITION EVENT DETAILS AND FEEDBACK

4.1 The following section describes the feedback during the engagement process.

4.2 Public Exhibition Event Feedback

4.3 Approximately 50 local residents attended the public exhibition event; their

interests are documented in Table 1 below:

Resident/Location Interest

Whitacre Heath Air quality due to the prevailing wind, noise from

the plant and odour

Male 36-55 Noise and smell

Male 70 Air quality

Female 36-55 Noise, pollution and visibility of the stack

Male 56-70 Noise

Male 56-70 HGV access

Female 56-70 Course presentation

Table 1 – Area of interest by those attending the public exhibition event

4.4 Specific information about the proposed scheme and the energy technology was

provided on large exhibition boards (see Appendix 7). The display boards also

included information about site selection and scheme benefits. Images were

displayed of similar energy plants currently in operation.

4.5 The display boards also included information on what types of environmental

surveys were commissioned as well as information about the applicant (Rolton

Kilbride), communications agency (CubanEight) and the applicant’s agent (Pegasus

Group).

4.6 To maximise attendance, the consultation covered hours during the daytime as well

as the evening on a week day (the event was held from 2.30pm to 8.30pm).

4.7 Questionnaire forms were available at the exhibition which included a mix of

scheme specific questions and more general ones about renewable energy and

space for any other comments and suggestions about the scheme. Those attending

the exhibition could either complete the forms on the spot or take them away with

them and post them or email back to the project team.


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 12

4.8 A total of 12 questionnaires were completed following the public exhibition on 4th

May 2016. Comments covered matters such as air quality and traffic concerns and

the feedback was mostly in favour of the development proposals.

APPENDIX 9: COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES

4.9 The first four questions of the comments form were more generally based relating

to support or opposition of climate change, Government renewable energy targets

and utilising non-recyclable waste to produce energy. The fifth question asked

participants to rank how supportive they were of the proposals for the REC on the

site on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being least supportive and 5 being most supportive). Of

the 12 comments forms which were completed, four residents scored the proposals

as a 5 (most supportive), three residents scored the proposals as a 4, two residents

scored the proposals as a 3 (neutral) and one resident scored the proposals as a 1

(closest to least supportive). Two residents declined to tick a box but their other

comments were generally supportive of the idea of the scheme.

4.10 The results demonstrate that seven out of twelve residents were in favour of the

Proposed Development; two residents were neutral and only resident was not in

support.

4.11 Additional questions on the comments forms allowed participants to explain their

grading of question 5 and space for further comments and suggestions.

Leaflet Drop Feedback

4.12 Following the leaflet drop on the 27th and 28th April 2016 which was circulated to

around 1,000 homes and 200 businesses, a total of 8 comments forms were

received via the tear away free post section of the leaflet. The comments received

were largely opposed to the scheme with one strongly in support.

APPENDIX 10: COMPLETED LEAFLET DROP FEEDBACK FORMS

4.13 The most common concerns about the development were:

Air pollution and odours;

Additional traffic generation;

Noise and vibration; and

Visual issues

4.14 Those supportive of the development were in favour of:

Green energy creation;


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 13

Reduction of waste going to landfill;

Improving the area and benefits to the community; and

Energy security.


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 14

5. PROJECT TEAM DESIGN RESPONSE TO PUBLIC, STAKEHOLDER AND WCC

CONSULTATION FEEDBACK

5.1 As discussed in Section 4, the response from those attending the public exhibition

event were mainly positive and supportive of the development proposals. The

feedback section from the leaflet drop was both positive and negative.

5.2 The Environmental Statement results and findings of Chapter 5 Air Quality; Chapter

6 Townscape and Visual; Chapter 7 Traffic and Transportation; and Chapter 10

Noise and Vibration will provide reassurance to those local residents who have

stated these as areas they are concerned about.

5.3 The air quality assessment has demonstrated that the Proposed Development will

not have a significant impact on dust and particulate matter levels during

construction (including demolition) with the recommended mitigation applied.

Odour and bioaerosol emissions will be kept to a sufficiently low level such that the

local effects will be insignificant. The overall operational air quality impacts are

judged to be not significant. This judgement takes account of the uncertainties in

future predictions of road traffic emissions, and the worst-case assumptions applied

in the dispersion modelling assessment.

5.4 The townscape and visual assessment has concluded the nature of the Proposed

Development, together with the context provided by the land uses surrounding the

Application Site, are considered to be appropriate to the setting and townscape

character of the site. The Proposed Development would not result in any significant

effects on local landscape or townscape features or elements, and would not have

any significant effects on visual amenity as experienced from locations within the

local area.

5.5 The traffic and transport assessment has concluded the Proposed Development can

be accommodated without any unacceptable detriment to the environmental effects

of traffic. The inclusion of mitigation measures at both construction and operational

phases would reduce the effects and impacts of the development further. A

Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) would be prepared so that

appropriate environmental management practices are followed and submitted to

the Local Planning Authority prior to the commencement of on-site works.

5.6 The noise assessment has concluded noise levels associated with the operation of

the Proposed Development are anticipated to be low and below a level which would

result in any significant adverse noise impacts, with noise associated with the


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 15

operation resulting in a negligible effect at surrounding properties. The construction

phase of the Proposed Development would not give rise to any adverse noise

impacts at surrounding properties either.

5.7 In conjunction with advice from WCC it was deemed important that the external

appearance of the plant should make a statement as the gateway to Hams Hall

Distribution Centre whilst being appropriate for the area. Several iterations of the

architectural detailing and materials were undertaken for the REC with the final

design ensuring that the building followed a similar design palette to that found

locally to consist of mainly a coloured cladding system.

5.8 A tree belt has been introduced on the southern boundary of the REC building which

integrates landscaping proposals into the overall design to screen visible elements

from the south (further details are provided within the accompanying Design and

Access Statement).

5.9 The Proposed Development meets the expectations of those who were supportive

of it and Chapter 13 of the ES which considers socio-economic effects has

demonstrated a number of positive benefits to the local community. The Proposed

Development will provide in the region of 100 to 130 additional jobs in the

construction sector during the construction phase and provision of 20 jobs during

the operational phase. The jobs will include elementary jobs during both the

operational and construction phases. The provision of a different range of jobs

locally may meet the needs of some local residents. The provision of a Jobs Fair

event that will enable local people to meet contractors and the operators for both

the construction phase and operation phase will also facilitate further local

employment.

5.10 Investment in construction, operation and maintenance will create indirect effects

including generating work for local tradesmen. The increase of the local disposable

income (for employees of the facility and tradesmen) will have induced effects on

local economy while the provision of lower priced sustainable energy for local

businesses, reducing business costs may be used to expand or enhance businesses

(including new jobs and/or increased wages).

5.11 Overall the design iteration process following the community, stakeholder and pre-

application consultation exercise has responded to the consultation process where

the Applicant has demonstrated they have listened and responded appropriately to

local residents and the Council’s views and revised the proposals accordingly.


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 16

5.12 The final design layout of the REC has been fixed to ensure any effects on the

environment are minimised. The scheme offers many benefits as highlighted in the

supporting planning application documentation.


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 17

6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

6.1 This document provides a statement of community consultation in support of an

application for planning permission for a Renewable Energy Centre (REC) which

uses a modern Advanced Conversion Technology (ACT) process called gasification

at Hams Hall Distribution Park, Faraday Avenue, Coleshill, Warwickshire.

6.2 The Proposed Development site extends to 1.96 hectares and comprises an REC

which will be capable of accepting 150,000 tonnes of non-hazardous residual waste

per annum which may otherwise go to landfill or be exported abroad and has the

capacity to generate up to 14.5 megawatts gross of electricity plus circa 1.5

megawatts of heat.

6.3 This statement of community consultation provides detailed information regarding

the pre-application consultation which has been undertaken prior to the submission

of the planning application seeking permission for the development.

6.4 The Applicant has engaged in a series of public consultation and promotional events

to include and inform the local and wider community of the development proposals.

6.5 A considered strategy to engage with local stakeholders was carefully delivered

from the outset and comprised a press release, stakeholder meeting; a leaflet drop

and invitation to a public exhibition where members of the design team as well as

air quality and transport consultants were on hand to answer any queries.

6.6 A total of approximately 50 people attended the public exhibition at Lea Marston

Hotel on Wednesday 4th May 2016. A total of 12 questionnaires were completed

following the public exhibition. Comments covered matters such as air quality and

traffic concerns and the feedback was mostly in favour of the development

proposals. Those completing the questionnaire were asked to rank how supportive

they were of the proposals for the REC on the site on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being

least supportive and 5 being most supportive). Of the twelve comments forms

completed the results demonstrate that seven out of twelve residents were in

favour of the Proposed Development; two residents were neutral and only resident

was not in support.

6.7 Following the leaflet drop on the 27th and 28th April 2016 which was circulated to

around 1,000 homes and 200 businesses, a total of 8 comments forms were

received via the tear away free post section of the leaflet. The comments received

were largely opposed to the scheme with one strongly in support.


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 18

6.8 The feedback following the community, stakeholder and pre-application

consultation exercise has been considered in the design iteration process and the

final design and layout of the REC to ensure comments such as concerns over

environmental effects including air quality and transport issues were taken account

of.

6.9 The REC will bring a range of environmental and socio-economic benefits to the site

and its surroundings as well as the local community.

6.10 The site landscaping proposals comprise planting new trees along the southern

boundary of the Proposed Development resulting in a net gain in the tree resource

within the Application Site.

6.11 The Proposed Development will provide in the region of 100 to 130 additional jobs

in the construction sector during the construction phase and provision of 20 jobs

during the operational phase. The jobs will include elementary jobs during both the

operational and construction phases and the provision of a different range of jobs

locally which may meet the needs of some local residents.


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 19

APPENDIX 1: SITE LOCATION PLAN

PLANNING | DESIGN | ENVIRONMENT | ECONOMICS


03 JUNE 2016 | PD | CIR.K.0173 Page | 20

APPENDIX 2: SITE LAYOUT

PLANNING APPLICATION FOR A RENEWABLE … Ash Silo – the fly ash silo framework stores the ... Fire...

Documents

Transcript of PLANNING APPLICATION FOR A RENEWABLE … Ash Silo – the fly ash silo framework stores the ... Fire...