Plan Summary Preview - Toyota BoshokuSigned Certification.pdf 19/12/2013 11:09:11 AM Company Name...
Transcript of Plan Summary Preview - Toyota BoshokuSigned Certification.pdf 19/12/2013 11:09:11 AM Company Name...
Plan Summary PreviewCompany Details
Report Details
ActivitiesContactsSelect the Facility Contacts
Facility ContactsPlease assign the appropriate contact under each category below.
Organization Validation
Environment Canada
Company Legal Name
Toyota Boshoku Canada Inc.
Company Address
45 Southfield Drive, Elmira (Ontario)
NPRI ID
11773
Facility Name
Toyota Boshoku Canada
Facility Address
230 Universal Road, Woodstock (Ontario)
Update Comments
Public Contact: *
Jason Dittburner
Highest Ranking Employee
Norimichi Adachi
Person responsible for Toxic Substance Reduction Plan preparation
Lloyd Hipel
Page 1 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:02:59 PM
Company and Parent Company InformationCompany Details
Mailing Address
Physical Address
Parent CompaniesEmpty
Environment Canada
Company Legal Name: * Toyota Boshoku Canada Inc.
Company Trade Name: * Toyota Boshoku Canada Inc.
Business Number: * 850793365
Delivery Mode
PO Box
Rural Route Number
Address Line 1 45 Southfield Drive
City * Elmira
Province/Territory ** Ontario
Postal Code: ** N4S 7W3
Address Line 1
City
Province/Territory **
Postal Code **
Additional Information
Land Survey Description
National Topographical Description
Page 2 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:02:59 PM
Facility ValidationThe information in this section was copied from the Single Window Information Manager (SWIM) at the timethe plan summary was created. Please verify the information and update it where required. Please note thatany changes made here will only be reflected in this plan summary. To ensure updates reflected in futurereports, please ensure the information is updated in SWIM. After making updates in SWIM, return here andclick the "Refresh" button to trigger a reload of the SWIM information. Please note all previously entered datawill be modified.
Facility Information
Facility Mailing Address
Physical Address
Environment Canada
Facility Name: * Toyota Boshoku Canada
NAICS Code: * 332999
NPRI Id: * 0000011773
ON Reg 127/01 Id
Delivery Mode
PO Box
Rural Route Number
Address Line 1 230 Universal Road
City * Woodstock
Province/Territory ** Ontario
Postal Code: ** N4S 7W3
Address Line 1 230 Universal Road
City Woodstock
Province/Territory ** Ontario
Postal Code ** N4S7W3
Additional Information
Page 3 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:02:59 PM
Geographical Address
Contact ValidationThe information in this section was copied from the Single Window Information Manager (SWIM) at the timethe plan summary was created. Please verify the information and update it where required. Please note thatany changes made here will only be reflected in this plan summary. To ensure updates reflected in futurereports, please ensure the information is updated in SWIM. After making updates in SWIM, return here andclick the "Refresh" button to trigger a reload of the SWIM information. Please note all previously entered datawill be modified.
ContactsPublic Contact
Mailing Address
Environment Canada
Land Survey Description
National Topographical Description
Latitude ** 43.12770
Longitude ** -80.71050
UTM Zone ** 17
UTM Easting ** 523547
UTM Northing ** 4775036
First Name: * Jason
Last Name: * Dittburner
Position: * Plant Specialist
Telephone: * 5196022121
Ext
Fax 5194219958
Email: * [email protected]
Delivery Mode
PO Box
Page 4 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:02:59 PM
Highest Ranking Employee
Mailing Address
Person responsible for the Toxic Substance Reduction Plan preparation
Environment Canada
Rural Route Number
Address Line 1 230 Universal Road
City * Woodstock
Province/Territory ** Ontario
Postal Code: ** N4S7W3
First Name: * Norimichi
Last Name: * Adachi
Position: * President
Telephone: * 5194217556
Ext
Fax
Email: * [email protected]
Delivery Mode
PO Box
Rural Route Number
Address Line 1 230 Universal Road
City * Woodstock
Province/Territory ** Ontario
Postal Code: ** N4S7W3
Page 5 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:02:59 PM
Mailing Address
EmployeesEmployees
Copy of Certifications of PlanCopy of Certifications of Plan
Upload DocumentA copy of the certification statement(s) from the Highest Ranking Employee and the Licensed Planner(s), forthe Toxic Substance Reduction Plan for which the Plan Summary is being submitted are required. Pleaseupload a single document containing all certifications. Do not upload any certification statements that are dated after December 31. If this applies, click "?" (Help)
Environment Canada
First Name: * Lloyd
Last Name: * Hipel
Position: * Project Manager
Telephone: * 5195785100
Ext
Fax
Email: * [email protected]
Delivery Mode General Delivery
PO Box
Rural Route Number
Address Line 1 1 Union Street
City * Elmira
Province/Territory ** Ontario
Postal Code: ** N3B 3J9
Number of Full-time Employees: *
515
Page 6 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
for more information.
Plan Summary SubmissionElectronic Submission
Substances141-78-6, Ethyl acetate141-78-6, Ethyl acetate
Substances Section DataStatement of IntentAre the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?
Use
Environment Canada
Comments
Website address where the Plan Summary is posted for the public
File Name Date
Signed Certification.pdf 19/12/2013 11:09:11 AM
Company Name
Toyota Boshoku Canada Inc.
Facility Name
Toyota Boshoku Canada
Report Submitted By (authorized delegate)
Jason Dittburner
I, the authorized delegate, acknowledge that by pressing the "Continue" button, I am electronicallysubmitting the facility TRA Plan Summary for the identified facility.
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
Page 7 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Creation
Objectives, Targets and DescriptionObjectives
Use TargetsWhat is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at thefacility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Environment Canada
Toyota Boshoku Woodstock intends to reduce the use of ethyl acetate through improved inventorytechniques, improved operating practices.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
Not created.
Objectives in plan: *
Toyota Boshoku Woodstock intends to reduce the use of ethyl acetate through improved inventorytechniques, improved operating practices.
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of targets
Page 8 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Creation TargetsWhat is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at thefacility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Reasons for Creation
Toxic Reduction Options for ImplementationDescription of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Environment Canada
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
As a formulation component
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
Contained in adhesive used at the facility.
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
This substance is not created at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
No, we are implementing
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If youanswered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
Page 9 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Materials or feedstock substitutionEmpty
Product design or reformulationEmpty
Equipment or process modificationsEmpty
Spill or leak preventionEmpty
On-site reuse, recycling or recoveryEmpty
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniquesOtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Optimize pick-up tube depth to use more adhesive per drum, thereby reducing the inventory quantityrequired.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.43 2
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 10 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Timelines
OtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Page 11 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Estimates
Environment Canada
Other
Describe the option: *
Track number of cycles per adhesive drum to maximize adhesive usage per drum.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
1.07 5
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Page 12 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Timelines
OtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Tilt adhesive drum to maximize adhesive use per drum, thereby reducing inventory quantity required.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.43 2
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at the
Page 13 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Timelines
Good operator practice or trainingOtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Environment Canada
facility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Page 14 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Estimates
Environment Canada
Other
Describe the option: *
Optimization of spray pattern and differential thickness settings.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.43 2
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Page 15 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Timelines
67-56-1, Methanol67-56-1, Methanol
Substances Section DataStatement of IntentAre the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?
Use
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
Best available options that are currently technically & economically feasible.
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0211
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0211
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
New Plan
Page 16 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Creation
Objectives, Targets and DescriptionObjectives
Use TargetsWhat is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at thefacility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Environment Canada
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
Toyota Boshoku Woodstock intends to reduce the use of methanol through product design, improvedinventory techniques, improved operating practices.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
Not created.
Objectives in plan: *
Toyota Boshoku Woodstock intends to reduce the use of methanol through product design, improvedinventory techniques, improved operating practices.
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
Page 17 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:00 PM
Creation TargetsWhat is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at thefacility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Reasons for Creation
Environment Canada
No timeline target years
or
Description of targets
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
As a formulation component
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
Contained in an adhesive used at the facility.
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
This substance is not created at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Page 18 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
Toxic Reduction Options for ImplementationDescription of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Materials or feedstock substitutionEmpty
Product design or reformulationChanged product specificationsWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
No, we are implementing
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If youanswered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Changed product specifications
Describe the option: *
Eliminate adhesive requirement for attaching components.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.14 12
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 19 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
Timelines
Equipment or process modificationsEmpty
Spill or leak preventionEmpty
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Page 20 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
On-site reuse, recycling or recoveryEmpty
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniquesOtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Optimize pick-up tube depth to use more adhesive per drum, thereby reducing the inventory quantityrequired.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.02 2
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 21 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
Timelines
OtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Track number of cycles per adhesive drum to maximize adhesive usage per drum.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.05 4
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
Page 22 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
Timelines
Environment Canada
reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Page 23 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
OtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Tilt adhesive drum to maximize adhesive use per drum, thereby reducing inventory quantity required.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.02 2
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 24 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
Timelines
Good operator practice or trainingOtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Optimization of spray pattern and differential thickness settings.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.02 2
Page 25 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
Timelines
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Page 26 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
NA - 31, Heptane (all isomers)NA - 31, Heptane (all isomers)
Substances Section DataStatement of IntentAre the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?
Use
Environment Canada
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
Best available options that are currently technically & economically feasible.
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0211
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0211
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
New Plan
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
Toyota Boshoku Woodstock intends to reduce the use of heptane through improved inventory techniques,improved operating practices.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Page 27 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
Creation
Objectives, Targets and DescriptionObjectives
Use TargetsWhat is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at thefacility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Creation TargetsWhat is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at the
Environment Canada
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
Not created.
Objectives in plan: *
Toyota Boshoku Woodstock intends to reduce the use of heptane through improved inventory techniques,improved operating practices.
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of targets
Page 28 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
facility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Reasons for Creation
Toxic Reduction Options for ImplementationDescription of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Environment Canada
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
As a formulation component
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
Component of adhesive used at the facility.
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
This substance is not created at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
No, we are implementing
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If youanswered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
Page 29 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:01 PM
Materials or feedstock substitutionEmpty
Product design or reformulationEmpty
Equipment or process modificationsEmpty
Spill or leak preventionEmpty
On-site reuse, recycling or recoveryEmpty
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniquesOtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Optimize pick-up tube depth to use more adhesive per drum, thereby reducing the inventory quantityrequired.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.17 2
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 30 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:02 PM
Timelines
OtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Page 31 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:02 PM
Estimates
Environment Canada
Describe the option: *
Track number of cycles per adhesive drum to maximize adhesive usage per drum.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.43 5
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the
Page 32 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:02 PM
Timelines
OtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Tilt adhesive drum to maximize adhesive use per drum, thereby reducing inventory quantity required.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.17 2
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 33 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:02 PM
Timelines
Good operator practice or trainingOtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Page 34 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:02 PM
Estimates
Environment Canada
Other
Describe the option: *
Optimization of spray pattern and differential thickness settings.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.17 2
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Page 35 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:02 PM
Timelines
NA - M09, PM10 - Particulate Matter <= 10 MicronsNA - M09, PM10 - Particulate Matter <= 10 Microns
Substances Section DataStatement of IntentAre the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?
Use
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
Best available options that are currently technically & economically feasible.
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0211
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0211
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
New Plan
Page 36 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:02 PM
Creation
Objectives, Targets and DescriptionObjectives
Use TargetsWhat is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at thefacility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Environment Canada
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Not used.
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
Toyota Boshoku Woodstock intends to reduce the creation of PM10 through product design, equipmentmodification, and training and improved operating practices.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
Objectives in plan: *
Toyota Boshoku Woodstock intends to reduce the use of PM10 through product design, equipmentmodification, and training and improved operating practices.
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
Page 37 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:02 PM
Creation TargetsWhat is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at thefacility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Reasons for Creation
Environment Canada
No timeline target years
or
Description of targets
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
This substance is not used at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
As a by-product
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Created as a by-product of natural gas combustion, welding, plastic injection moulding, and cooling towerprocesses.
Page 38 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:02 PM
Toxic Reduction Options for ImplementationDescription of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Materials or feedstock substitutionEmpty
Product design or reformulationModified design or compositionWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
No, we are implementing
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If youanswered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Modified design or composition
Describe the option: *
Reduced weld length to minimum length required.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.05 5
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 39 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:03 PM
Timelines
Equipment or process modificationsOtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Page 40 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:03 PM
Estimates
Environment Canada
Other
Describe the option: *
Switch to two-speed fan during periods of low cooling demand to reduce drift from cooling tower.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.19 21
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Page 41 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:03 PM
Timelines
OtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
2
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Install VFD on welding exhaust fans.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.01 1
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at the
Page 42 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:03 PM
Timelines
Spill or leak preventionEmpty
On-site reuse, recycling or recovery
Environment Canada
facility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
2
Page 43 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:03 PM
Empty
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniquesEmpty
Good operator practice or trainingOtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Automate AMU use (using master key or control system).
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.00 0.3
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 44 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:03 PM
Timelines
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
2
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
Best available options that are currently technically & economically feasible.
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0211
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0211
Page 45 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:03 PM
NA - M10, PM2.5 - Particulate Matter <= 2.5 MicronsNA - M10, PM2.5 - Particulate Matter <= 2.5 Microns
Substances Section DataStatement of IntentAre the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?
Use
Creation
Objectives, Targets and DescriptionObjectives
Environment Canada
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
New Plan
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxicsubstance at the facility: **
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **
Not used.
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxicsubstance at the facility?: *
Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **
Toyota Boshoku Woodstock intends to reduce the use of PM2.5 through product design, equipmentmodification, and training and improved operating practices.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **
Objectives in plan: *
Toyota Boshoku Woodstock intends to reduce the creation of PM2.5 through product design, equipmentmodification, and training and improved operating practices.
Page 46 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:03 PM
Use TargetsWhat is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at thefacility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Creation TargetsWhat is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at thefacility? *
What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *
Reasons for Use
Environment Canada
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of targets
No quantitytarget
Quantity Unit
or
No timeline target years
or
Description of Target
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *
This substance is not used at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **
Page 47 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:03 PM
Reasons for Creation
Toxic Reduction Options for ImplementationDescription of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Materials or feedstock substitutionEmpty
Product design or reformulationModified design or compositionWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *
As a by-product
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **
Created as a by-product of natural gas combustion, welding, plastic injection moulding, and cooling towerprocesses.
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *
No, we are implementing
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic SubstanceReduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If youanswered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Modified design or composition
Describe the option: *
Reduced weld length to minimum length required.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 48 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:03 PM
Timelines
Environment Canada
0.04 8
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Page 49 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:04 PM
Equipment or process modificationsOtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
1
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Switch to two-speed fan during periods of low cooling demand to reduce drift from cooling tower.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.00 0.4
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 50 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:04 PM
Timelines
OtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
2
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Install VFD on welding exhaust fans.
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
Page 51 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:04 PM
Timelines
Environment Canada
reduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.01 1
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Page 52 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:04 PM
Spill or leak preventionEmpty
On-site reuse, recycling or recoveryEmpty
Improved inventory management or purchasing techniquesEmpty
Good operator practice or trainingOtherWhich activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Estimates
Environment Canada
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
2
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *
Other
Describe the option: *
Automate AMU use (using master key or control system).
N/A tonnes %
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will bereduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.00 1
Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 53 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:04 PM
Timelines
Environment Canada
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facilitywill be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
N/A years
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxicsubstance:
1
Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
Best available options that are currently technically & economically feasible.
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the useand creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxicsubstance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
Page 54 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:04 PM
Environment Canada
TSRP0211
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reductionplan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *
TSRP0211
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *
New Plan
Page 55 of 55 Printed on 01/06/2017 7:03:04 PM