Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next...

15
PIPER25: WORKFORCE INVOLVEMENT DAY Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation

Transcript of Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next...

Page 1: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

PIPER25: WORKFORCE INVOLVEMENT DAY

Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation

Page 2: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation

Page 3: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CO

NTR

OL

OF

WO

RK

Page 4: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CO

NTR

OL

OF

WO

RK

Permits to work

Recommendations 32 – 38 (volume 2)

38. Copies of all issued permits to work should

be displayed at a convenient location and in a

systematic arrangement such that process

operating staff can readily see and check

which equipment is under maintenance and

not available for operation.

Page 5: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CO

MP

LAC

ENC

Y

The risk of a prolonged high pressure gas fire

14th

October 1986 – report by Elmslie Consultancy Services Inc for

Occidental

“These pipelines, especially the gas pipelines, would

take hours to depressurise because of their capacity.

This could result in a high pressure gas fire on the cellar

deck would be virtually impossible to fight and the

protection systems would not be effective in providing

the cooling needed for the duration of the

depressurisation.”

Page 6: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CO

MP

LAC

ENC

Y

Safety case

Recommendations 1-13 (volume 2)

4. The safety case should be a demonstration

that so far is reasonably practicable the

exposure of personnel on the platform to

accidental events and their consequences has

been minimised.

Page 7: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CO

MM

UN

ICA

TIO

N

Page 8: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CO

MM

UN

ICA

TIO

N

Emergency centres and systems

Recommendations 62 - 70 (volume 2)

64. The regulations and related guidance notes

should promote an approach to emergency

systems:-

(i) Which provides to a high degree the ability

of these systems to survive severe accident

conditions; and

(ii)Which applies to communications systems

the fail-safe principle

Page 9: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CO

MP

ETEN

CY

The OIM

Page 10: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CO

MP

ETEN

CY

Command in emergencies

Recommendations 97 - 99 (volume 2)

99. There should be a system of emergency

exercises which provides OIMs with practice

in decision-making in emergency situations,

including decisions on evacuation. All OIMs

and their deputies should participate regularly

in such exercises.

Page 11: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CU

LTU

RE

Page 12: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CU

LTU

RE

Pipeline emergency procedures

Recommendations 71 - 72 (volume 2)

72. Operators should be required by regulation

to institute and review regularly a procedure

for shutting down production on an installation

in the event of an emergency on another

installation which is connected to the first by a

hydrocarbon pipeline where the emergency is

liable to be exacerbated by continuation of

such production

Page 13: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CO

MM

ITM

ENT

Individual Management

Regulator Company

Page 14: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

CO

NC

LUSI

ON

Page 15: Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation · Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation. Piper Alpha: The challenge for the next generation . C ONTROL OF RK. C ONTROL

Questions?