Pipeline Project GK-Teras Paper update

8/7/2019 Pipeline Project GK-Teras Paper update

1/17


2/17

16/10/2010

2

Overview

Gunung Kembang Pipeline Project,SSE Block Indonesia

PT Medco E&P Indonesia

Operation Areas

SULAWESIKALIMANTAN

SUMATRA

Merangin

SimenggarisBengaraTarakan

Senoro-Toili

NunukanSembakung

Bangkanai

Yap en

Block AUS Gulf of Mexico

OmanLibya

CambodiaYemen

Tunisia

PAPUA

JAWALematang

SS Extension/Kampar

Rimau

Jakarta

Jeruk

Bawean


3/17

16/10/2010

3

South Sumatra Working Area

Project Background& Scope of Work



4/17

16/10/2010

4

Project BackgroundPT Medco E&P Indonesia has commitment to supplyadditional gas of 15 BBTUD (13.5 MMSCFD) tocustomers, and Gunung Kembang field need to deliver up o .

The existing Gunung Kembang (GK) Teras pipelinehas capacity of 20 MMSCFD

Upgrading the pipeline capacity of GK-Teras toaccomodate the additional gas up to15 MMSCFD

Project Scope of Work

Installation 8 SP 9Teras pipeline 15 km (Segment -1)

Installation 6 Gunung Kembang-SP 9 pipeline 17 km(Segment-2)

River Crossing Keruh (108 m) and Tarum (204 m)

Testing and Certification

The schedule : December 2009 to August 2010


5/17

16/10/2010

5

Pipeline Schematic SSE Block

New Pipeline Project GK-Teras

Pipeline Engineering



6/17

16/10/2010

6

Engineering Code & Standards

ASME B31.8 : Gas Distribution and Transportation

ASME B16.5 : Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, Steel,

Nickel Alloy and other Special Alloy

API RP 14C : Recommended Practice for Analysis,

Design, Installation, and Testing of BasicSurface Safety Systems

API RP 1104 : Welding of Pipeline and Related Facilities

Pipeline Capacity

Pipeline Capacity

8"(existing)

8"(new)

8" and 6"(new)

1Option 1G. Kembang = 830 psigTeras = 620 psig

20 MMSCFD 20 MMSCFD - 40 MMSCFD

2Option 2G. Kembang = 830 psigTeras = 620 psig

20 MMSCFD - 15 MMSCFD 35 MMSCFD

DescriptionNoo a

Capacity


7/17

16/10/2010

7

Design Parameters

Description Data

Fluid GasFluid density 21.10 lb/ft3 (337.99 kg/m3)Maximum operating pressure 850 psig (5.86 Mpa)Maximum operating temperature 120 F (48.89 C)

Pipeline Detail and Material Selection

Description GK - SP9 Segment SP9 - Teras Segment

Pipe material CS API 5L Gr. B Sch. 40 CS API 5L Gr. B Sch. 40Outside Diameter 6.625 inch (168.275 mm) 8.625 inch (219.075 mm)Wall thickness 0.28 inch (7.112 mm) 0.322 inch (8.18 mm)

Length of pipe 17 km 15 kmCorrosionProtection Polyethylene Wrapping Tape Polyethylene Wrapping Tape


8/17

16/10/2010

8

Schematic Drawing

River Crossing


9/17

16/10/2010

9

Road Crossing

Cleaning

Commissioning

Dewatering

Hydrostatic Testing

Gauging

Gas In

Drying and Purging


10/17

16/10/2010

10

Construction ProjectManagement


Project Management Process

Source: Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)


11/17

16/10/2010

11

Initiating Issued Project Service Agreement ( PSA ) between

Technical Services Division (project executor) andpera on sse wner

PSA consists of: Project Objective

Project Scope of Work Project Schedule

Project Budget

Project Organization

Planning

Master Schedule

SegmentSegment- -11 on early May 10on early May 10

SegmentSegment- -22 on early Sept 10on early Sept 10

Using existing material from other lower-priority projectsCombination 8 15 km Segment -1 & 6 17 km Segment-2


12/17

16/10/2010

12

Planning - OrganizingForming the project team (internal), creating a WBS, andallocating resources (manpower, equipment & material)

Work Breakdown Schedule (WBS)Work Breakdown Schedule (WBS) :a) Engineering (8%)b) Land acquisition (20%)c) Procurement (25%)

d) Construction andCommissioning (45%)

e) Handover (2%)

ro ec xecu onro ec xecu on ra egy nra egy nonon--In-house EngineeringIn-house Project ManagementIn-house Material ProcurementSeparately Service Contract: Fabrication, NDT, Equipment, Hydrostatic

Executing

Pipeline Sections for ConstructionPipeline Sections for Construction

8 Segment-1 on stream early May 20106 Segment-2 : Part 1 started construction on April 2010

Part 2 started construction on June 2010


13/17

16/10/2010

13

Controlling S Curve ProjectWEIGHTFAC TO R W 0 W 1 W 2 W 3 W 4 W 5 W 6 W 7 W 8 W 9 W 10 W 11 W 1 2 W 1 3 W 14 W 1 5 W 1 6 W 1 7 W 1 8 W 19 W 2 0 W 2 1 W 1 8 W 19 W 2 0 W 2 1 W 2 2 W 2 3 W 24 W 2 5 W 2 6 W 2 7 W 28 W 2 9 W 3 0 W 3 1 W 3 2 W 33 W 3 4 W 3 5

% 7 / 12 1 4 /1 2 2 1 /1 2 2 8/ 1 2 4 / 1 11/ 1 1 8 / 1 2 5 / 1 1 / 2 8 / 2 1 5/ 2 2 2 / 2 1 / 3 8 / 3 1 5 / 3 2 2 / 3 2 9 / 3 5 / 4 1 2 / 4 1 9 / 4 2 6 / 4 3 / 5 1 0 /5 1 7 / 5 2 4 / 5 3 1 / 5 7 / 6 1 4 /6 2 1 / 6 2 8 / 6 5 / 7 1 2 /7 1 9 / 7 2 5 / 7 1 / 8 8 / 8 1 5/ 8 2 2 / 8 2 9 / 8

1 ENGINEERING 8,001,1 Survey 1 Lot 0,80 0 ,4 8 0, 321.2 Basic Design 1 Lot 1,20 0, 18 0, 54 0,40 0,081.3 Drawing 1 Lot 1,20 0, 11 0, 20 0,26 0,29 0, 22 0,10 0, 021.4 MTO 1 Lot 1,60 0,24 0, 72 0,53 0, 111 ,5 A s Bu il t Dr aw in gS P IX -T er as 1 L ot 1,60 0 ,96 0 ,6 41 ,6 A s Bu il t Dr aw in gG K- SP IX 1 L ot 1,60 0, 48 0, 88 0, 24

2 LANDACQUISITION 20,002 ,1 L an d ac qu is it io n an d So zi al i ta ti on 1 Lo t 20,00 0,80 1,40 2,00 2,40 2,60 2,80 2,60 2,20 1,40 1,00 0,40 0,40

3 PROCUREMENT 25,00

Des-09 Jun-10 Jul-10 Agust-10N O. DE SCR IP TI ON Q TY & UN IT

Mei-10 Apr-10Jan-10 Mar-10Feb-10

3 ,1 C ontracting 0,203 .1 .1 W el di ng , He av yE qu ip me nt 1 L ot 0,10 0,00 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,00 0,00 0,003 .1 .2 R iv er C ro ss in gS . Ta ru m 1 L ot 0,10 0,00 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,00 0,00 0,003,2 Materials 24,80

3 .2 .1 P ip e 6" A PI 5 L Gr .B S ch . 40 E RW 1 .4 50 J ts 7,44 0,45 1,12 1, 34 1,56 1, 49 0, 97 0,37 0,153.2.2 Pipe8"API5LGr.BSch.40ERW 1.250 Jts 9,10 1, 36 4,09 3,00 0, 643.2.3 Instrument 1 Lot 1,49 0,06 0,13 0,19 0,22 0,28 0,22 0,18 0,12 0,04 0,033.2.4 PipeFittings 1 Lo t 2,48 0,10 0,22 0,32 0,37 0,47 0,37 0,30 0,20 0,07 0,053.2.5 Closure12" 2 Ea 0,73 0,03 0,07 0,09 0,11 0,14 0,11 0,09 0,06 0,02 0,013.2.6 Closure10" 2 Ea 0,50 0, 03 0, 07 0,09 0,10 0, 10 0,06 0, 02 0, 013.2.7 WrappingTape 2.400 Roll 3,07 0,18 0,46 0, 55 0,65 0, 61 0, 40 0,15 0,06

4 CONSTRUCTIONWORK+ COMMISIONING 45,008"TERAS-SP IX SEGMENT(15 Km) 18,00

4,1 CivilWork 6,304 .1 .1 P re par ing the ROW 1 5 Km 2,21 0,33 0, 99 0,73 0, 154 .1 . 2 P ig L /R F ou nd at io n Te ra s & SP I X 1 L ot 0,63 0, 19 0, 35 0, 094.1.3 Ditching 15 Km 0,95 0,14 0,43 0, 31 0,074 .1 .4 B ac kf il li ng & Co mp ac ti ng 1 5 K m 2,52 0, 38 1,13 0, 83 0, 184,2 Mechanical Work 0,90

4.2.1 F abr ic at e &I ns ta ll P ig L/ R 8" 1 L ot 0,90 0 ,2 7 0 ,4 95 0 ,1 354,3 PipelineWork 9,00

4 .3 .1 R iv er C ro ss in gS . Ke ru h 1 L ot 1,80 0, 27 0,81 0, 594 0, 126 04.3.2 Stringing 1.250 Jts 0,45 0, 14 0, 25 0, 074 .3 . 3 Wel di ng & X -R ay C he ck in g 1 .2 50 J ts 4,23 0, 55 1,18 1, 44 0, 85 0,214 .3 .4 W ra pp in g& Ho li da yT es t 1 5 K m 0,90 0,12 0, 25 0, 31 0,18 0,054.3.5 Lowering 15 Km 0,45 0, 14 0, 25 0, 074 .3 .6 F lu sh in g& Hy dr ot es ti ng 1 L ot 0,45 0,454.3.7 Dewatering 1 Lot 0,36 0,364.3.8 Drying 1 Lot 0,36 0,364,4 Instrument Work 0,90

4 .4 .1 Ins ta ll Ins tr um ent 1 Lo t 0,90 0 ,5 4 0 ,364,5 COMMISIONING 1 Lo t 0,45 0,454,6 INSPECTION& CERTIFICATION 1 Lo t 0,45 0, 27 0 ,1 8

6"GK- SPIXSEGMENT(20Km) 27,004,1 CivilWork 9,45

4 .1 .1 P re par ing the ROW 1 7 Km 4,25 0, 47 0,94 1,15 1,02 0,51 0,17

4 .1 .2 Pi gL /R F ou nd at io nG K& SP I X 1 Lo t 0,95 0, 28 0, 52 0, 144.1.3 Ditching 17 Km 1,42 0,21 0,64 0,47 0,104 .1 .4 B ac kf il li ng & Co mp ac ti ng 1 7 K m 2,84 0,85 1,56 0,434,2 Mechanical Work 1,35

4.2.1 F abr ic at e &I ns ta ll P ig L/ R 6" 1 L ot 1,35 0 ,8 1 0 ,5 44,3 PipelineWork 13,50

4 .3 .1 R iv er C ro ss in gS . Ta ru m 1 L ot 3,92 0,59 1,77 1,30 0, 274 .3 .2 R oa dCr os si ng SP VIII 1 Lo t 0,80 0, 24 0, 44 0, 124.3.3 Stringing 1.450 Jts 0,68 0, 20 0, 37 0, 104 .3 . 4 Wel di ng & X -R ay C he ck in g 1 .4 50 J ts 2,70 0,16 0,41 0, 49 0,57 0,54 0,35 0,14 0,054 .3 .5 W ra pp in g& Ho li da yT es t 1 7 K m 2,03 0,26 0,57 0,69 0,40 0, 104.3.6 Lowering 17 Km 1,35 0,41 0,74 0,204 .3 .7 F lu sh ing & Hy dr ot es ti ng 1 L ot 0,68 0,684.3.8 Dewatering 1 Lot 0,68 0,684.3.9 Drying 1 Lot 0,68 0,684,4 Instrument Work 1,35

4 .4 .1 Ins ta ll Ins tr um ent 1 Lo t 1,35 0 ,8 1 0 ,5 44,5 COMMISIONING 1 Lo t 0,68 0,684,6 INSPECTION& CERTIFICATION 1 Lo t 0,68 0,68

5 HANDOVER & CLOSEOUT 1 Lo t 2,00 0,66 0,30 0,14 0,90

GRANDTOTAL 100,000,00 0,48 0,61 2,11 5,39 5,53 6,05 6,63 6,32 5,20 4,25 4,15 4,48 2,97 2,51 1,39 0,61 0,99 1,49 1,52 2,86 2,51 1,94 1,55 1,91 2,22 1,93 2,12 2,78 1,56 1,97 3,09 2,66 2,00 1,25 1,22 0,68 1,35 0,82 0,900,00 0,48 1,09 3,20 8,59 14,12 20,18 26,80 33,13 38,32 42,58 46,73 51,21 54,19 56,70 58,09 58,70 59,69 61,18 62,70 65,56 68,07 70,00 71,55 73,46 75,68 77,61 79,73 82,50 84,07 86,04 89,13 91,79 93,79 95,05 96,26 96,94 98,29 99,10 100,00,00 0,00 3,00 6,00 6,97 6,97 3,49 2,96 3,01 2,07 2,50 1,42 2,12 6,11 5,86 4,47 2,18 2,37 2,72 2,14 1,65 3,50 3,41 2,89 2,76 1,35 1,36 0,88 0,68 0,41 0,84 1,07 0,56 1,19 1,49 0,82 0,58 0,58 1,29 2,310,00 0,00 3,00 9,00 15,97 22,94 26,43 29,39 32,40 34,48 36,98 38,40 40,53 46,64 52,50 56,96 59,15 61,52 64,24 66,38 68,02 71,53 74,94 77,83 80,60 81,95 83,31 84,19 84,87 85,28 86,12 87,19 87,75 88,94 90,43 91,25 91,84 92,41 93,70 96,01

-0 ,5 1 ,9 5 ,8 7 ,4 8 ,8 6 ,3 2 ,6 - 0, 7 - 3 ,8 - 5 , 6 - 8, 3 -10,7 -7 ,6 - 4 ,2 - 1, 1 0 ,5 1 ,8 3 ,1 3 ,7 2 ,5 3 ,5 4 ,9 6 ,3 7 ,1 6 ,3 5 ,7 4 ,5 2 ,4 1 ,2 0 ,1 - 1, 9 - 4 ,0 - 4 , 9 - 4, 6 - 5 ,0 - 5 , 1 - 5, 9 - 5 ,4 - 4 , 0

INCREMENTALACTUAL

PLANNING

AHEAD/BEHIND

INCREMENTAL ACCUMULATIVE

( + / - ) ACCUMULATIVE

Controlling - Problem

1) There was a problem during pig cleaning (segment-1):the pig was stuck for 1 week (April-May).

2) Legal administration of ROW caused delay:1) the start of the project part-2 for 3 weeks (July)

2) the completion of the segment-2 for 7 weeks (Sept-Oct).

3) Material wrapping tape delivery (segment-2) wasdelayed for 5 weeks (July-August) impact to backfillingprogress


14/17

16/10/2010

14

Controlling Overcoming

hydrostatic test.

2) Local inhabitants invite into the works and negotiationvia local officer.

3) Provide additional resources (manpower andequipment) for fast track the project.

Closing - Lesson Learns

Right of Way Procurement & Project

(ROW)

Advance Project

Socialization toStakeholder

Process

Proper Planning

Strategy

Conduct cost-benefit analysis

Maintaincoordination toStakeholder during the projectexecution


15/17

16/10/2010

15

Project Benefit &Conclusion


Cost Benefit Analysis

a.a. Engineering ValueEngineering Value

8 15 km and 6 17 km instead of 8 32 km

1,970,883.35$ 2,442,316.90$

8" 15km & 6" 17km8" 32km

1,970,883.35$ 2,442,316.90$

8" 15km & 6" 17km8" 32km

Saving 20% of material cost

471,433.54$ 471,433.54$


16/17

16/10/2010

16

Cost Benefit Analysis (2)b.b. Project Cost (excluding material)Project Cost (excluding material)

In House vs EPC Contract

Saving 20% of EPC

Average ($ / km-inch) TotalIn House 8.387,39 1.862.000,00 EPC Contract * 10.526,53 2.336.889,39

474.889,39 * f rom other similiar medco's projects

c.c. TotalTotal sasavingving comparecompared d to EPCto EPC : : 2020%%(engineering, material, construction)

Opportunity Benefit

Capacity Pipeline after Segment 1 on stream

Price: USD 4 / Mbtu

8" GK-Teras Existing 20

68" Segment 1 (New) 268" - 6" GK-Teras (New) 35

Potential capacity gain from on stream Segment 1 = USD 224K4K / day/ day

PotentialPotential revenuerevenue after after total GKtotal GK TerasTeras onon streamstream = USD= USD 60K60K / day/ day


17/17

16/10/2010

17

ConclusionPipeline Gunung Kembang Teras Projecthas been successful delivering gas sales,and met the sectional project time frame

.

In-house execution saved 20% comparedto EPC contract with strong contributionfrom Engineering value and ProjectManagement

By completion of this project is expectedincreasing the potential gas sales revenueup to USD 60,000/day

Thank You

Pipeline Project GK-Teras Paper update

Documents

Transcript of Pipeline Project GK-Teras Paper update