Pillars of Heaven
Transcript of Pillars of Heaven
Pillars of Heaven
6th International Conference on High Energy Density Laboratory AstrophysicsMarch 11 – 14, 2006
Marc Pound University of Maryland
Jave Kane, Bruce Remington, Dmitri RyutovLawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Akira MizutaMax-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics
How do pillars form?
Pillars (elephant trunks) common
Formation mechanism unclear
Instabilities at cloud interface?
Pre-existing dense cores?
Observations of morphology alonecannot distinguish between models.
H+
Formation Mechanism ExamplesAblative Rayleigh-Taylor instability
e.g., Spitzer (1954); Frieman (1954); Axford (1964); Mizuta et al. (2005)
(linear RT damped by recombination)See Dmitri Ryutov’s poster
Shadowing Instabilitye.g., Williams (1999)
Dense core/Cometary globulee.g., Reipurth (1983); Bertoldi & McKee (1990);
Lefloch & Lazareff (1994); Williams et al (2001)
In most of these scenarios, the formationtimescale for L ~ 0.5 pc is a few X 105 yr
Measure received power W as a function of frequency; Antenna temperature TA= W/k. Doppler shift gives radial velocity.
θ ~ 0.2 – 10'' δV ~ 0.1 km/s
CO(J=1–0) is the primary observational surrogate for H2
Horsehead Nebula
0.5 pc
Radiotelescopes
Datacubes
Can slice cube in multiple ways, take moments, etc.Position-velocity cuts are important diagnostic tool.
What the observations tell us (model constraints)
Observables
Temperature
Velocity
absolute
gradient
dispersion
line shape
Magnetic Field
Derivables
Density
Mass
Pressure
thermal
turbulent
Column density
Timescales:
Dynamical
Evaporation
... 40 K
... 25 km/s
... 2-10 km/s/pc
... 1 km/s
... complex
... ??
... 105 cm-3
... 800 Msun
(dyne cm-2)... 10-10
... 10-8
... 1022 cm-2
... 105 years
... 107 years
See Robin Williams poster
Measuring the B Field: If it wasn't for bad luck...Magnetic pressure can provide cloud support; Field orientation gives clues to formation history.
● Hope for future observations
● Plane-of-sky orientation via dust polarization at sub-mm.
● Line-of-sight strength via Zeeman effect in spectral lines.
Poor weather for 2 seasons in a row, then instrument was decommissioned.
Initial maps show OH emission too weak to measureZeeman effect with current instruments.
● Dust polarization with Submillimeter Array or CARMA● Zeeman with CARMA or EVLA● Velocity anisotropy in CO (Heyer 2006): NO NEW OBS REQUIRED!
Our Model (details in Jave's talk)We have developed a comprehensive 2-D hydrodynamic model that includes:
Energy deposition and release due to the absorption of UV radiation
Recombination of hydrogenRadiative molecular coolingMagnetostatic pressureGeometry/initial conditions based on
Eagle observationsTry to match Pillar II since it appears
the simplest.
See Akira Mizuta's poster
log10(ρ)
starcloud
positions in pc
t = 0
t = 100 kyr
t = 250 kyr
The Objective To go from this...
R, Z, VR, VZ, ρ...to this.
X, Y, VZ, F
We need to create synthetic observations (datacube)by ''observing'' the model. (See my last HEDLA talk)
Synthetic Observations – very briefly
BIMA millimeter array
Interferometers measure the Fourier Transform of the sky brightness distributionAs Earth rotates, antennas pairs trace out ellipses in the Fourier domain, sampling different spatial frequencies. Longer baselines give higher spatial resolution. Orient model on sky to match Eagle. Sample it with the same uv coverage. FFT and deconvolveusing the known point spread function. u
v
Example uv coverage
Comparison: Total Intensity
Size and shape reasonably match
Gap behind model “head”
Not enough material in model “tail”
More closely resembles top of Pillar I ?
Synthetic Map Real Map
Comparison: Velocity Field (Long axis)
Velocity gradient is roughly correct. Not enough material in model tail. Velocity dispersion too small in model (Line width too narrow).
5 km
/s
~ 1 pc
Comparison: Velocity Field (short axis)
Model shows signature of “inside-out shear”; data cut not so obvious.Model has limb brightening, data do not.
3 km
/s
~0.3 pc
My Ideal Scaled Laser Experiment
● Real molecular clouds have structure.
● Velocity, velocity, velocity!Measure pillar internal velocities with spectrometer or VISAR
See Paula Rosen’s poster
M ~ 10
Re ~ 5x108
Clumps, filaments, inter-clump gas
My Ideal Scaled Laser Experiment
● Real molecular clouds have structure.
● Velocity, velocity, velocity!Measure pillar internal velocities with spectrometer or VISAR
See Paula Rosen’s poster
M ~ 10
Re ~ 5x108
Clumps, filaments, inter-clump gas
“The question you need to ask yourself is Do I feel lucky?”
My Ideal Scaled Laser Experiment
● Real molecular clouds have structure.
● Velocity, velocity, velocity!Measure pillar internal velocities with spectrometer or VISAR
See Paula Rosen’s poster
M ~ 10
Re ~ 5x108
“Well, do ya, punk?
Clumps, filaments, inter-clump gas
Summary Our model can adequately represent much of the real input astrophysics of the Eagle.
Gross physical properties of pillars (size, shape, velocity gradient) reproduced. Details need work.
Eagle pillars more complicated than simple case considered.
Use synthetic observations to identify best models. Use best models to design laser experiments.
Models applicable to many astronomical objects. We have good data already for Eagle, Horsehead, Pelican nebulae.
Hubble/NICMOS
AdvertisementThe Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy
(CARMA)
Merger of BIMA and OVRO mm arrays atnew high site. Operational in mid-2005.
Order of magnitude improvement in imaging fidelity over existing arrays.
Steps to create synthetic observations1) Orient model properly on sky: rotation θ and inclination i.
2) Taper model brightness according to field of view response function & mosaic pattern.
3) Sample with actual uv coverage of observations to create Fourier domain visibilities.
4) Add noise due to receivers and atmosphere. Note this is done in the Fourier domain.
5) Grid the visibilities and FFT back to image domain.
6) Deconvolve image with ''dirty'' beam (Airy pattern). This is the CLEAN algorithm.
7) Reconvolve CLEAN components with ''clean'' Gaussian beam, add back in residuals.
Tools: NEMO dynamics toolbox, MIRIAD interferometry package
SuccessesBasic shape reproduced
Correct final densities reproduced:
n(H2) = 103 – 105 cm-3
Correct velocity gradient reproduced:
VY sini ~ 3 km/s/pc, compare with 2.2 km/s/pc in Pillar II
CaveatsNo radiative transfer – brightness assumed proportional to mass in pixel.Comparing 2D model to integrated 3D datacube – need a full 3D or cylindrical model to examine velocity field and pillar substructure.
Testing the Rayleigh-Taylor Instability
No change in g or inclination i, can match data.
A classic RT spike (incompressible, semi-infinite layer thickness) in free fall under pseudo-gravity g has velocity of form:
V(X) – V0 = [ 2 g ( X – X0 ) ]1/2
Again with the Rayleigh-Taylor Instability!Classic RT has constant density, therefore constant
column density (# emitters along line of sight).
Data show large variations in H2column density (clumpiness).
The BIMA Millimeter Array
● Observations at λ=1 and 3 mm
● Earth-rotation aperture synthesis
● Ten 6.1 meter dishes
● Interferometric baselines as long as 2 km
● Resolution of 0.2'' at 1 mm
● Compact configuration for mapping large-scale structure
● 4 configurations like VLA
● Mosaicing large fields
Premier imaging millimeter-wave telescope
How long will the Horsehead last?
evaporation timescaletevap= M / (dM/dt)
mass loss rate due to photoionizationdM/dt = 2�r2 ci mpni
Lyman continuum absorbed in layer comparable to cloud radiusni = (LLyC / 4�αB)1/2 r-1/2 d-1
tevap ~ 5 Myr
...plug in the numbers, turn crank...
Molecular clouds
Agglomerations of molecular material with masses 102 to 106 Msun
Located primarily in galactic spiral arms
Where stars form
Dominated by turbulence
Clumpy structure
Temperatures ~ few X 10K
Volume densities ~ 103 – 107 cm-3
Primarily H2 with traces of:
CO – 10– 4
dust – 10– 2
Bell Labs
10 pc
Orion GMC