Photometric detection of the starlight reflection by a “Pegasi” planet Martin Vannier (1),...
-
Upload
allan-chambers -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Photometric detection of the starlight reflection by a “Pegasi” planet Martin Vannier (1),...
Photometric detection of the starlight reflection by a
“Pegasi” planet
Martin Vannier(1), Tristan Guillot(2), Suzanne Aigrain(1)
(1) ESO, Chile(2) OCA, France(3) Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge, UK Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
A description of two proposals in the
Corot Additional Programme
2 proposals in the Corot Additional Programme(M. Vannier, T. Guillot, S. Aigrain)
● I: Observation of the starlight reflected by a “Pegasi” planet ➢Phase B
● II: Photometric detection of “Pegasi” planets in the seismo field➢Accepted
Photometric detection of the starlight reflection by a “Pegasi” planet
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
Photometry of Star+Planet varies with planetary phase
Principle
In a perfect simple world :
⇨ Periodical variations of the photometry
Photo
metr
ic v
ari
ati
on (
ppm
)
Planetary signal
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
Amplitude of the signal (homogeneous reflection, circular orbit):
S=1/2 A sin(i) (Rpl/a)2
A: Albedoi: orbital inclination Rpl: planetary radiusa: orbital distance
⇨Degeneracy between A, i, (R) ⇨constrains the parameters space
Signal / fundamental noise
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
● Amplitude of the signal:
S=1/2 A sin(i) (Rpl/a)2
➢ “Pegasi” are much favored
E.g.: HD46375 (target for Prop. II), a=0.04 AU, Rpl=1.3 Rjup
⇨ S= a few 10-5
● Photon Noise: B=1/sqrt(Nph) with Nph photons per sample. E.g.: mV=7.9
Sample =3h ⇨ B=4 10-6, SNR=30
● Instrumental (white) noise also nulls out
Photo
metr
ic v
ari
ati
on (
ppm
)
Stellar activity
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
E.g.: simulations of HD46375 (S. Aigrain) : A fairly quiet K1 IV star, RMS=170 ppm
Planet (i=/6, A=0.5)
(Dotted: Star alone)
Planet + Star + photon noise
Spectral Analysis with known orbital period and phase (Prop. I)
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
➢ Stellar activity exceeds the signal in amplitude, including at the (known) orbital frequency
➢ Fit with a sine, to best match both the amplitude and phase at the orbital frequency.
In the case of HD46375, the precision on the amplitude of the planetary reflection would be:⇨ 30% for a 20-days short run⇨ <10% for a 150-days run
Sine fit
Planetary signal
Measured signal,including stellar activity
Field of View and Target (Prop. I)
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
HD46375:
- in FOV- K1 IV type-star- a=0.04 AU- mV=7.94
Favorable planet-host stars and the Corot “eyes”
Field of View and Target (Prop. I)
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
HD46375:
- K1 IV type-star- a=0.04 AU- mv=7.94- in FOV
Together with short-run primary target HD46558 in seismo field
➢ Phase BPegasi-planet target HD46375(cross)
together with primary target HD46558
Proposal IIPotential for new detections
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
Number of detection =
Number of objects observed 60 (10 per season)
× Proportion hosting a Pegasi planet1%
× Fraction of these for which the planetary reflection signal can be distinguished from the stellar activity. Largely unknown... 1/3 ??
0.2 ??⇨ Not much, but potentially high value result at a free cost !
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
Orbital frequency
Sine fit (frequency, amplitude, phase) on a HD46375-type star: ⇨ Precision over 150 days: <10% on the amplitude of the planetary reflection
5% on its period
Spectral Analysis with unknown orbital elements
Coping with stellar activity for new detections
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
● Depends on rotational velocity, colour index and age of the star
● Used simulations for MS stars with: type = F5 to K5, rotational period = 5 to 40 days
● Sine fit on a 150-days serie with two free parameters(*) yields:
➢ a precision on the amplitude ranging from 20% to a few % (depending on S.T) for slow-rotating stars (P=40 d)
➢ strongly degraded precision for fast rotators (prohibitive for P≤15 d)
➢ a number of local minima ⇨ fake alarms or dubious cases
(*) Orbital period and phase. A fixed ⇨ amplitude = f(period)
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
⇨A potential for new detection of Pegasi planets around low-activity stars of the seismo field. But...
Further work to be done...Need for:
● A better simulation including:- eccentric orbit, albedo depending on the planetary
phase (⇨ peaked “Mercury-type” reflection)
- estimated stellar activity representative of the actually observed population
- a smarter fit algorithm
● RV follow-up to raise the ambiguity on the dubious cases
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
For a circular orbit and a homogeneous albedo:
S=1/4 A (Rpl/a)2 (1-sin(i)*cos(2 pi t/P))
But the variations or not sine in case of :
⇨eccentric orbit
⇨surface albedo depends on the orbital configuration
Planetary signal as a function of time
Planetary signal + Fundamental Noise???
Corot Week 2005 Ubatuba, Brazil, 2-6 Oct.
Dominated by photon noise: B=1/sqrt(Nph) with Nph: stellar flux, time
E.g.: HD46375 SNR =