Philosophy of Mathematics
-
Upload
rey-john-rebucas -
Category
Education
-
view
52 -
download
0
Transcript of Philosophy of Mathematics
![Page 1: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Philosophy of
Mathematics
By: Rey John B. Rebucas
3D3
![Page 2: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is Philosophy of Mathematics?
The philosophy of mathematics is the branch of philosophy that studies the philosophical assumptions, foundations, and implications of mathematics (Hilbert,1996).
Studies the nature of mathematical truth, mathematical proof, mathematical evidence, mathematical practice, and mathematical explanation (Russell, 1997).
![Page 3: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Ontology for Mathematics: “Being”
Ontology studies the nature of the objects of mathematics.
It is the claim that mathematical objects exist independently of their linguistic expression.
“What we are talking about.” What is a number? What is a point? line? What is a set?
![Page 4: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Epistemology for Mathematics: “Knowing”
Epistemology studies the acquisition of knowledge of the truth of a mathematical statement.
“whether what we are saying is true.” Does knowledge come from
experience and evidence? Does knowledge come from argument
and proof? Is knowledge relative or absolute?
![Page 5: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
According to Plato,
knowledge is a subset of
that which is both truths
and beliefs.
![Page 6: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Classical Views on
the Nature of
Mathematics
Plato (c.428–347 B.C.)
He included mathematical
entities—numbers and
the objects of pure geometry such as points, lines, and circles—among
the well-defined, independently existing eternal
objects he called Forms.
![Page 7: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Aristotle (384–322
B.C.)
He rejected the notion of Forms being separatefrom empirical objects, and maintained
instead that the Forms constitute parts of objects.
LeibnizHe divided all true
propositions, including those of
mathematics, into two types: truths of fact, and truths of reason,
alsoknown as contingent and analytic truths,
respectively.
![Page 8: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Immanuel Kant (1724–
1804) He introduced a new classification of(true) propositions:
analytic, and nonanalytic, or
synthetic, which hefurther subdivided
into empirical/truth, or a posteriori, and non-empirical, or a
priori.
![Page 9: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PURE MATHEMATICS
is the analysis ofthe structure of pure space and
time, free from empirical material.
APPLIED MATHEMATICS
is the analysis of the structure of space and time,
augmented by empirical material. .
![Page 10: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Four Schools of Mathematical
Philosophy In the first decades of the
twentieth century, three non-platonistic accounts of mathematics were developed:
1.logicism, 2. formalism, 3. intuitionism, and4. predicativism
![Page 11: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1. LOGICISM
It holds that mathematics is reducible to principles of pure logic.
![Page 12: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Richard DedekindDedekind’s “logicism” embraced allmathematical concepts: the concepts of number—natural, rational,real, complex—and geometric concepts such as continuity.
![Page 13: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Logicism, a mathematical truth and logical demonstration go hand in hand.
Quine (1995)
![Page 14: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Frege (1884)Frege's Basic Law V: {x|Fx}={x|Gx} ≡
∀x(Fx ≡ Gx)
Frege devoted much of his career to trying to show how mathematics can be reduced to logic.
The Foundation of Arithmetic, a logico-mathematical
investigation into the concept of number.
![Page 15: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2. FORMALISM is the view that
much or all of mathematics is devoid of content and a purely formal study of strings of mathematical language/
medium of formal symbols.
![Page 16: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
David Hilbert In 1899, he published his
epoch-making work Grundlagen
der Geometrie (“Foundations of Geometry”). He developed toanalyze the deductive system of Euclidean geometry—we might call itthe rigorized axiomatic method, or the metamathematical method.
![Page 17: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
On the formalist view, a minimal requirement of formal systems of higher mathematics is that they are at least consistent.
Hilbert aims theprovision of a new foundation for mathematics by representing its essential form within the realm ofconcrete symbols.
For example:2 + 2 = 4
would count as a realproposition, while there exists an odd perfect number would count as an ideal one/real or concrete.
![Page 18: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Kurt Gödel He demonstrates his celebrated Incompleteness Theorems, that
there would always be real propositions provable by ideal means whichcannot be proved by concrete means. He allows finite
manipulations of suitablychosen abstract objects in addition to the concrete ones Gödel hoped tostrengthen finitistic metamathematics sufficiently to enable theconsistency of arithmetic to be demonstrable within it.
![Page 19: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
3. INTUITIONISM It holds that
mathematics is concerned with mental constructions and defends a revision of classical mathematics and logic.
![Page 20: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Intuitionism rejects non-constructive existence proofs as ‘theological’ and ‘metaphysical’.
φ ∨ ¬φAccording to intuitionism, mathematics
is essentially an activity of construction. The natural numbers are mental
constructions, the real numbers are mental constructions, proofs and theorems are mental constructions, mathematical meaning is a mental construction.
![Page 21: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
L.E.J. Brouwer(1882-1966)
Brouwer heldthat mathematical theorems are synthetic a priori truths. He maintained, in
opposition to the logicists (whom he called “formalists”)
that arithmetic, and so all mathematics, must derive from the intuition of time.
![Page 22: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Arend Heyting (1898–1980) A mathematical
theorem expresses a purely empirical fact, namely, the success of a certain construction.
“2 + 2 = 3 + 1”
![Page 23: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
4. PREDICATIVISM There emerged in
the beginning of the twentieth century also a fourth program.
Due to contingent historical circumstances, its true potential was not brought out until the 1960s.
![Page 24: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Poincaré-Russell A sound definition of
a collection only refers to entities that exist independently from the defined collection. Such definitions are called predicative.
Paradox about the collection C of all mathematical entities that satisfy ¬x∈ x.
![Page 25: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Weyl (1918) He developed a
philosophical stance that is in a sense intermediate between intuitionism and platonism.
He took the collection of natural numbers as unproblematically given.
![Page 26: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
New Views In Recent Decades
![Page 27: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Structuralism
which holds that mathematics is the study of abstract structures.
Non-eliminative version of structuralism holds that there exist such things as abstract structures.
An eliminativeversion tries to make do with concrete objects variously structured.
![Page 28: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Nominalism denies that there are any
abstract mathematical objects and tries to reconstruct classical mathematics accordingly.
![Page 29: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Fictionalism is based on the idea that, although
most mathematical theorems are literally false, there is a non-literal (or fictional) sense in which assertions of them nevertheless count as correct.
![Page 30: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Mathematical Naturalism
urges that mathematics be taken as a sui generis discipline in good scientific standing.
![Page 31: Philosophy of Mathematics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58ed64a11a28ab6b678b469d/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Rey John B.
Rebucas
BEEDGen. Ed.
3D3