1

Philosophical Foundations of Organization & Management Theories

2

1. Paul R. Carlile and Clayton M. Christensen (2004), The Cycles of Theory

Building in Management Research , Boston : Boston University.

2. Adrianna Kezar(2006) , TO USE OR NOT TO USE THEORY: IS

THATTHE QUESTION? in J.C. Smart , Higher Education: Handbook of

Theory and Research, Vol. XXI, 283–344.

3. Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi and GeorgeW. Hay(2004) , Actionable Knowledge

and Scholar-Practitioners: A Process Model of Theory-Practice Linkages ,

Systemic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 17, No. 3.

4. Ghoshal Sumantra (2005), Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good

Management Practices, Academy of Management Learning & Education,

Vol. 4, No. 1, 75–91.

5. Alan Sheldon(1980) , Organizational Paradigms: A Theory of Organizational

Change , Organizational Dynamics, Winter 1980.

6. Peter R.J. Trim and Yang-Im Lee(2004) ,A reflection on theory building and

the development of management knowledge ,Management Decision, Vol. 42,

No. 3/4, pp. 473-480.

7. John G. Wacker(1998) , A definition of theory: research guidelines for

different theory-building research methods in operations management,

Journal of Operations Management, No.16 pp. 361–385.

8. William McKinley(2010), Organizational Theory Development: Displacement

of Ends?, Organization Studies , 31(01): 47–68.

9. Ajit Nayak(2008),On the Way to Theory: A Processual Approach,

Organization Studies 29(02): 173–190.

10. Gerald F. Davis & Christopher Marquis (2005), Prospects for Organization

Theory in the Early Twenty-First Century: Institutional Fields and

Mechanisms, Organization Science 16(4), pp. 332–343.

11. David Denyer, David Tranfield and Joan Ernst van Aken (2008), Developing

Design Propositions through Research Synthesis, Organization Studies

29(03): 393–413.

12. Gerald F. Davis (2010), Do Theories of Organizations Progress?,

Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 690-709.

13. Davis and Marquis(2005), Prospects for Organization Theory in the Early

Twenty-First Century, Organization Science ,16(4), pp. 332–343.

3

14. Béatrice Lallé (2003), The Management Science Researcher between Theory

and Practice, Organization Studies 24(7), 1097–1114.

15. Paula Jarzabkowski, Susan Albers Mohrman and Andreas Georg Scherer

(2010), Organization Studies as Applied Science: The Generation and Use of

Academic Knowledge about Organizations Introduction to the Special Issue,

Organization Studies ,31(09&10), 1189–1207.

16. Alexander Nicolai and David Seidl (2010), That's Relevant! Different Forms

of Practical Relevance in Management Science, Organization Studies

31(09&10) ,1257–1285.

17. Nic Beech, Robert MacIntosh and Donald MacLean (2010), Dialogues

between Academics and Practitioners: The Role of Generative Dialogic

Encounters , rganization Studies, 31(09&10) ,1341–1367.

18. Tim Newton (2010), Knowledge and Practice: Organization Studies within a

Historical and Figurational Context, Organization Studies ,31(09&10), 1369–

1395.

19. André Spicer and Steffen Böhm (2007), Moving Management: Theorizing

Struggles against the Hegemony of Management, Organization Studies

,28(11), 1667–1698.

20. MICHAEL A. HITT & PAUL W. BEAMISH & SUSAN E. JACKSON &

JOHN E. MATHIEU (2007), BUILDING THEORETICAL AND

EMPIRICAL BRIDGES ACROSS LEVELS: MULTILEVEL RESEARCH

IN MANAGEMENT, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 50, No. 6,

1385–1399.

21. ALBERT A. CANNELLA & RAMONA L. PAETZOLD (1994), PFEFFER'S

BARRIERS TO THE ADVANCE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SCIENCE: A

REJOINDER, Academy o/ Management Review , Vol. 19, No. 2. 331-341. 22. T. Marshall Egan (2002) , Grounded Theory Research and Theory Building ,

Advances in Developing Human Resources ,Vol. 4, , No. 3 ,pp. 277-295.

23. Jeffrey Pfeffer (1993), Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science:

Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable, The Academy of

Management Review, Vol. 18,, No. 4 , pp. 599-620.

24. WENDY K. SMITH & MARIANNE W. LEWIS(2011),TOWARD A

THEORY OF PARADOX: A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF

ORGANIZING, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 381–

403.

4

25. Davis Ralph C. (1958)A philosophy of management, The Journal of

Insurance , Vol. 25 ,No. 3, pp. 1-7.

26. Weiherich Heinz (1993) , Management: science ,theory and

practice,MacGraw-Hill.

27. Peron Michel and Peron Monique (2003) , Postmodernism and the socio-

economic approach to organizations, Journal of Organizational Change

Management ,Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 49-55.

28. NORMAN JACKSON and PIPPA CARTERt (1995) , THE "FACT" OF

MANAGEMENT, Scand. J. Mgrat, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 197-208.

29. Mary E. Boyce (1996), Organizational story and storytelling: a critical

review, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 5-

26.

30. Andrew G. Walder (1978),ORGANIZATIONS: SOCIAL STRUCTURE.

AND HISTORICAL CHANGE Toward an Historical Sociology of

Organizations, University of Michigan.

31. Michael Schwartz(2001), ―Management as the Spirit of the Modern Age‖ ,

Journal of Business Ethics , 29: 189–198.

32. Barbara Czarniawska (),Has Organization Theory a Tomorrow?,

Organization Studies 28(1), 27–29.

33. Robert P. Gephart Jr(1996) , Postmodernism and the future history of

management: Comments on history as science , Journal of Management

History , Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 90-96.

34. Robin Holt and Frank Mueller (2012) , Wittgenstein, Heidegger and Drawing

Lines in Organization Studies , Organization Studies , 32(1), 67–84.

35. Patrick Reedy and Mark Learmonth (2011) , Death and Organization:

Heidegger's Thought on Death and Life in Organizations , Organization

Studies , 32(1), 117–131.

36. Deena Weinstein and Michael A. Weinstein (1998) , Is postmodern

organization theory sceptical?, Journal of Management History, Vol. 4 , No. 4

, pp. 350-362.

37. PER OLOF BERG (1989) , POSTMODERN MANAGEMENT? FROM

FACTS TO FICTION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE , Scand. J.

Management Vol. 5. No. 3. pp. X1-217.

38. Joep P. Cornelissen and Mario Kafouros (2008) , Metaphors and Theory

Building in Organization Theory: What Determines the Impact of a

Metaphor, British Journal of Management, Vol. 19, 365–379.

5

39. Dobuzinskis Laurent (1997) , Historical and epistemological trends in

public administration , Journal of Management History, Vol. 3 No. 4, 1997,

pp. 298-316.

40. Ajnesh Prasad (2009),Contesting Hegemony through enealogy: Foucault and

Cross Cultural Management Research, International Journal of Cross

Cultural Management , 9, 359.

41. Edward Barratt (2008), The later Foucault in organization and management

studies, Human Relations , Vol. 61(4), 515–537.

42. JOHN HASSARD (1994) , POSTMODERN ORGANIZATIONAL

ANALYSIS: TOWARD A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, Joumat of

Management Studies, 31:3.

43. Ralf Davis (1958) , philosophy of management , The journal of insurance ,

vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 1-7.

44. Amitai Etzioni (1960) , Two approaches to organizational analaysis : a

critique and a sugesstion , Administrative Science Quarterly , vol. 5 , No. 2 ,

pp. 257-278. 45. Dennis K. Mumby (1997),Modernism, Postmodernism, and Communication

Studies: A Rereading of an Ongoing Debate , Communication Theory, PP. 1-

28. 46. Philip Hancock and Melissa Tyler (2001) , Managing Subjectivity and the

Dialectic of Self-Consciousness: Hegel and Organization Theory ,

Organization , 8, 565.

47. Craig P. Dunn and Troy N. Chapman (2008) , Comparative Management

Philosophies: Michael E. Porter, Tom Peters, and Fred E. Fiedler , Western

Washington University.

48. Bryan C. Taylor (2004) , "Postmodern Theory" in Engaging Organizational

Communication Theory and Research by: Mumby , pp. 113-140.

49. Philip Selznick (1948) , Foundation of the theory of organization, American

Sociological Review , vol.13, No. 1, pp. 25-35.

6

50. Tim Goles and Rudy Hirschheim(2000), The paradigm is dead, the

paradigm is dead. . .long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and

Morgan, Omega, 28 ,249±268.

51. Wolfgang Pindur and Sandra E. Rogers and Pan Suk Kim (1995) , The

history of management: a global perspective, Journal of Management History

Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 59-77.

52. Chester S. Spell(2000) , Where do management fashions come from, and how

long do they stay? , Journal of Management History, Vol. 5 No. 6, pp. 334-

348.

53. Rocky J. Dwyer (2005), Formal organizations in contemporary society: The

relevance of historical perspectives, Management Decision, Vol. 43 No. 9,

pp. 1232-1248.

54. Nell Tabor Hartley (2006) , Management history: an umbrella model ,

Journal of Management History, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 278-292.

55. Gazendam, Henk W.M. (1993). Conceptual analysis and specification of

Morgan‘s metaphors using the CAST method , Variety Controls Variety: On

the Use of Organization Theories in Information Management. Groningen:

Wolters-Noordhoff.

56. Yvon Pesqueux(1994) ,Discussing the company: model, metaphor and image

,Management Decision , 37/10 , 817±824.

57. James G. March (2007) , The Study of Organizations and Organizing Since

1945 , Organization Studies , 28(1), 9–19.

58. Matthias Huehn (2008) , Paradigms in Management , Working Paper, No. 9.

59. Calvin Morrill (2008) , Culture and Organization Theory , the American

Academy of Political and Social, Aug 20.

60. Joep P. Cornelissen and Mario Kafouros (2008) , The Emergent

Organization: Primary and Complex Metaphors in Theorizing about

Organizations, Organization Studies , 29(07) ,957–978.

61. MATTHEW J. LAMBERT(2006), A review of Images of Organization, by

Gareth Morgan, 2006. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

62. Tom Elfring and Henk W. Volberda , Schools of Thought in Strategic

Management: Fragmentation, Integration or Synthesis.

63. Joep P. Cornelissen (2006) , Making Sense of Theory Construction:

Metaphor and Disciplined Imagination , Organization Studies, 27(11) , 1579–

1597.

64. Colman McMahon (2011) , Management Theories ―Contemporary

Approaches‖ Lecture 8.1.

65. Colman McMahon (2011) , Management Theories ―Contemporary

Approaches‖ Lecture 7.2.

7

66. Dilay Rabinson (2005), Thinkers for the 21th century? , Training Journal

,January.

67. Kavous Ardalan, (2007),"Corporate governance: a paradigmatic look",

International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 34 Iss: 8 pp. 506 – 524.

68. Peter F. Drucker , Management's New Paradigms. 69. Richard Scott (2002), Organizations as Rational, Natural, and Open Systems

, Prentice-Hall.

70. Willy Mccourt (1991) , Discussion Notes: using metaphors to understand and

to change organizations: a critique of Gareth Morgans approach,

Organization Studies , 18/ 3 , pp. 511-522.

71. Mary Jo Hatch, Ann L. Cunliffe(2006) , Organization Theory: Modern,

Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives, Oxford.

72. Morgan, G. (1998), Images of Organization, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Publications.

73. Łukasz Sułkowski (2010) , Two Paradigms in Management epistemology ,

Journal of Intercultural Management ,Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 109–119.

74. Gibson Burrell and Gareth Morgan (2005),Sociological Paradigms and

organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life,

Ashgate Publishing Limited.

8

75. Pierre Cossette (2002) , Analysing the thinking of F.WW. Taylor using

cognitive mapping , Management Decision , Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 168-182.

76. Danielle S. Beu and Nancy H. Leonard (2004) , Evangelism of great works in

Management How the gospel is spread , Management Decision ,Vol. 42 No.

10, pp. 1226-1239.

77. Stephanie C. Payne and Satoris S. Youngcourt and Kristen M. Watrous

(1995) , Portrayals of F.W. Taylor across textbooks, Journal of

Management History, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 385-407.

78. Fariss-Terry Mousa and David J. Lemak(2009)The Gilbreths‘ quality system

stands the test of time , Journal of Management History ,Vol. 15 , No. 2, pp.

198-215.

79. STEPHEN P. WARING (2010) , Peter Drucker, MBO, and the Corporatist

Critique of Scientific Management.

80. Jill R. Hough, and Margaret A. White (2001), Using stories to create change:

The object lesson of Frederick Taylor's ''pig-tale'' , Journal of Management

,27 , 585–601.

81. Katia Caldari (2007) , Alfred Marshall‘s critical analysis of scientific

Management, Euro. J. History of Economic Thought, 14,1 55 – 78.

82. WILSON John F. and THOMSON Andrew W. (2006), A Managerial

Rationality? Scientific Management and the Organization of Knowledge,

1880-1915The Making of Modern Management: British Management in

Historical Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press,p.176.

83. Wasim Al-Habil (2010) , The development of the concept of the "one best

method" in public administration , Journal of public administration and

policy research ,Vol. 2(6) , pp. 96-102. 84. Shane J. Ralston , Scientific Management and Pragmatism in PA

Theory:Taylor and Dewey as Strange Bedfellows.

85. Yonatan Reshef (2001), Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856 - 1915) Principles of

Scientific Management.

86. EDWIN A. LOCKE(1982) ,The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An

Evaluation, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 7, No. I, 14-24.

87. Frederick Winslow Taylor(1911), The Principles of Scientific Management.

88. Hindy Lauer Schachter, (2010),"The role played by Frederick Taylor in the

rise of the academic management fields", Journal of Management History,

Vol. 16 , No. 4 pp. 437 – 448.

3D

9

89. Mildred Golden Pryor and Sonia Taneja(2010) , Henri Fayol, practitioner

and theoretician – revered and reviled, Journal of Management History,Vol.

16, No. 4, pp. 489-503.

90. Donald Reid(1995) , Reading Fayol with 3D glassesJournal of Management

History, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 63-71.

91. 57. Michael J. Fells(2000) , Fayol stands the test of time Journal of

management History ,Vol. 6No.8, pp. 345-360.

92. Lee D. Parker and Philip Ritson(2005) , Fads, stereotypes and management

gurus: Fayol and Follett today, Management Decision,Vol. 43 No. 10, 2005,

pp. 1335-1357.

93. Lee D. Parker and Philip A. Ritson (2005) , Revisiting Fayol: Anticipating

Contemporary Management, British Journal of Management, Vol. 16, 175–

194 .

94. DANIEL A. WREN and ARTHUR G. BEDEIAN (2009),THE EVOLUTION

OF MANAGEMENT THOUGHT, JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.

95. Daniel A. Wren and Arthur G. Bedeian and John D. Breeze (2002) , The

foundations of Henri Fayol‘s administrative Theory , Management Decision

,40/9 , 906-918.

96. Demetrios Argyriades(2010) , From Bureaucracy to Debureaucratization? ,

Public Organiz Rev , 10:275–297.

11

97. 63.Stephen Karberg (1980) , Max Webers types of rationality : cornerstones

for the analysis of rationalization processes in history , The American

Journal of Sociology , VOL.85 N.5 pp.1145-1179.

98. 64. George Ritzer(2007) , The Weberian Theory of Rationalization and the

McDonaldization of Contemporary Society.

99. 65. George Psathas , The Ideal Type in Weber and Schutz.

100. 67. Harro M. Ho¨pfl (2006) , Post-bureaucracy and Weber‘s ―modern‖

bureaucrat , Journal of Organizational Change Management , Vol. 19, No. 1,

pp. 8-2.

101. 68. SVEN ELIAESON (2000) , MAX WEBER‘S METHODOLOGY: AN

IDEAL-TYPE , Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 36(3),

241–263 .

102. 71. Richard S. Bolan(1999) , Rationality revisited An alternative perspective

on reason in management and planning, Journal of Management History,

Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 68-86.

103. Milan Zafirovski (2008) , Classical and neoclassical conceptions of

rationality—Findings of an exploratory survey ,The Journal of Socio-

Economics, 7, 789–820.

104. Mark R. Rutgers(1999) , Be rational! But what does it mean? A history of

the idea of rationality and its relation to management thought,journal of

Management History, Vol. 5 No. 1 , pp. 17-35.

105. HEINZ K. KLEIN and RUDY HIRSCHHEIM(19919) , RATIONALITY

CONCEPTS IN INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT

METHODOLOGIES, Accting., Mgmt. &Info. Tech., Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 157-

187.

106. M. Shamsul Haque(1997) , INCONGRUITY BETWEEN BUREAUCRACY

AND SOCIETY IN DEVELOPING NATIONS: A CRITIQUE, PEACE &

CHANGE, Vol. 22 , No. 4, 432–462.

107. Nancy DiTomaso (1993) , WEBER‘S SOCIAL HISTORY AND ETZIONI‘S

STRUCTURAL THEORY OF CHARISMA IN ORGANIZATIONS:

IMPLICATIONS FOR THINKING ABOUT CHARISMATIC

LEADERSHIP , Leadership Quarterly, 4(3/4), 257-275.

108. Keith Tribe (2007) , Talcott Parsons as translator of Max Weber‘s basic

sociological categories, History of European Ideas, 33 , 212–233.

109. STEPHEN CUMMINGS and TODD BRIDGMAN(2011),The Relevant Past:

Why the History of Management Should Be Critical for Our Future ,

Academy Management Learning & Education, Vol. 10, No. 1, 77–93.

110. Michael Lounsbury and Edward J. Carberry (),From King to Court Jester?

Weber‘s Fall from Grace in Organizational Theory , Organization Studies ,

26(4) , 501–525.

111. Pursey Heugens (2005) , A Neo-Weberian Theory of the Firm , Organization

Studies , 26(4) , 547–567.

112. Eric J. Walton () , The Persistence of Bureaucracy: A Meta analysis Of

Weber‘s Model of Bureaucratic Control , Organization Studies , 26(4) , 569–

600.

113. Gyorgy Gajduschek (2003) , Bureaucracy: Is It Efficient? Is It Not? Is That

The Question? : Uncertainty Reduction: An Ignored Element of Bureaucratic

Rationality, Administration & Society , 34 ,700.

11

114. Allen (2004) , EXPLORATIONS IN CLASSICAL SOCIOLOGICAL

THEORY , Authority and Rationality—Max Weber (German, 1864–1920) ,

143- 184.

115. Kivisto (2007) , CLASSICAL SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, The

Weberian Theory of Rationalization and the McDonaldization of

Contemporary Society by: George Ritzer, pp.41 -59. 116. Grey (2008) , Studying Organizations: Bureaucracy and Scientific

Management ,pp.21-43.

117. Philip Selznick (1943) , an approach to atheory of bureaucracy , American

Sociological Review , vol. 8 , No. 1, pp. 47-54.

118. Somchat Visitchaichan , Revisiting Weber's Theory of Bureaucracy and its

Usefulness for Analyzing Organizational Structures and Issues , Mahidol

University International College, Salaya Campus. Nabonpathom, Thailand .

119. Bureaucracy and Formal Organizations.

120. Thomas Burger (1998) , Max Weber's Methodology in Its Place,

International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, Vol. 12, No. 2 , pp.277-

291.

121. George Psathas , The Ideal Type in Weber and Schutz.

122. Demetrios Argyriades (2010) , From Bureaucracy to Debureaucratization? ,

Public Organiz. Rev., 10 , 275–297.

123. Richard H. Hall (1963), The concept of Bureaucracy: an empirical

assessment , American Journal of Sociology , vol. 69 , No. 1, pp. 32-40.

124. Fritz Sager and Christian Rosser(2009) , Weber, Wilson, and Hegel:

Theories of Modern Bureaucracy , Public Administration Review , November

- December , pp. 1136- 1147.

125. Bureaucracy , rationalization and organization theory.

126. Stephen Kalberg () , Max Weber type of rationality : cornerstones for the

analysis of rationalization processes in history, American Journal of

Sociology , vol. 85 , No. 5, pp. 1145-1179.

12

127. Behrooz Kalantari(2010) ,Herbert A. Simon on making decisions: enduring

insights and bounded rationality ,Journal of Management History, Vol. 16,

No. 4, pp. 509-520.

128. Gerry Kerr(2007) ,The development history and philosophical sources of

Herbert Simon‘s Administrative Behavior , Journal of Management History

,Vol. 13 , No. 3, pp. 255-268.

129. Peter L. Cruise (1997) , Are proverbs really so bad? Herbert Simon and the

logical positivist perspective in American public administration, Journal of

Management History, Vol. 3, No. 4 , pp. 342-359.

130. Floris Heukelom (2006) ,What Simon Says, Tinbergen Institute.

131. Gustavo Barros (2010) , Herbert A. Simon and the concept of rationality:

Boundaries and procedures , Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, vol. 30,

No. 3 (119), pp. 455-472.

132. Herbert A. Simon (1955) , A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , The

Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 99-118.

133. Herbert A. Simon (1972) , Theories of Bounded Rationality , Decision and

Organization, pp. 161-176.

134. Herbert A. Simon (1962) , The Architecture of Complexity , Proceedings of

the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 106, No. 6, pp. 467-482.

135. Herbert A. Simon (1972) , Theories of decision making in Economics and

Behavioral Sciences , American Economic Review , Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 253-

283.

136. Jesper Simonsen (1994) , Herbert A. Simon:Administrative Behavior: How

organizations can be understood in terms of decision processes , Computer

Science, Roskilde University.

137. Stefano Fiori (2008) , Herbert A. Simon and Contemporary Theories of

Bounded Rationality , University of Turin.

138. Herbert A. Simon (1946) , The Proverbs of Administration , Public

dministration Review, Vol. 6, No. 1., pp. 53-67.

X و Y

13

139. Kevin T. Mahoney and David B. Baker(2002) , Elton Mayo and Carl Rogers:

A Tale of Two Techniques, Journal of Vocational Behavior 60, 437–450 .

140. Van Nostrand Reinhold , Hawthorne Revisited , the papers delivered at the

Hawthorne symposium eventually incorporated in a book to be published by

Van Nostrand Reinhold.

141. Terns 0. J. Ananaba (1981) , MANAGEMENT BY MOTIVATION,

Engineering Management International, 1 ,63-71.

142. Ansfied B. Weinert (1986) , Testing Argyris‘ Theory of Organizational

Behavior, Journal of Management Studies, August 1986.

143. Charles M. Carson(2005) , A historical view of Douglas McGregor‘s TheoryY

, Management Decision, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 450-460.

144. Kelly Dye and Albert J. Mills and Terrance Weatherbee(2005) , Maslow:

man interrupted: reading management theory in context , Management

Decision, Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 1375-1395.

145. James C. Dingley(1997) , Durkheim, Mayo, Morality and Management ,

Journal of Business Ethics , 16: 1117–1129.

146. Edgar Schein(2011) Douglas McGregor: theoretician, moral philosopher or

behaviorist? An analysis of the interconnections between assumptions, values

and behaviour , Journal of Management History ,Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 156-164.

147. Thomas C. Head (2011) Douglas McGregor‘s legacy: lessons learned, lessons

lost ,Journal of Management History,Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 202-216.

148. Kyle Bruce and Chris Nyland () , Elton Mayo and the Deification of Human

Relations , Organization Studies, 32(3), 383–405.

14

149. James C. Dingley (1997) , Durkheim, Mayo, Morality and Management ,

Journal of Business Ethics ,16 , pp.1117–1129.

150. Fritz J. Roethlisberger (1941) , The Hawthorne Experiments , Harvard

University Press.

151. Andrea Gabor and Joseph T. Mahoney (2010), Chester Barnard and the

Systems Approach to Nurturing Organizations , City University of New

York.

152. Dave McMahon and Jon C. Carr(1999) , The contributions of Chester

Barnard to strategic management theory, Journal of Management History,

Vol. 5, No. 5 , pp. 228-240.

153. Milorad M. Novicevic, Leigh Ann Bynum and Mario Hayek And Tony

Fang(2011),Integrating Barnard‘s and contemporary views of industrial

relations and HRM , Journal of Management History ,Vol. 17 ,No. 1, pp. 126-

138.

154. Hui Chen, Miguel Baptista Nunes, Lihong Zhou, Guo Chao Peng,

(2011),"Expanding the concept of requirements traceability: The role of

electronic records management in gathering evidence of crucial

communications and negotiations", Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 63 , Iss: 2 , pp.

168 – 187.

155. Joseph T. Mahoney (2002) , the relevance of Chester I. Barnards teachings to

contemporary management education , Interntional J. of Org. Theory &

Behav., 5 (1 & 2) , 159-172.

156. Lee D. Parker and Philip Ritson(2005) , Fads, stereotypes and management

gurus: Fayol and Follett today, Management Decision,Vol. 43 No. 10, 2005,

pp. 1335-1357.

157. Brian R. Fry and Lotte L. Thomas (2004) , Mary Parker Follett: assessing

the contribution and impact of her writings, Journal of Management History,

Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 11-19.

158. Dafna Eylon (1998) , Understanding empowerment and resolving its paradox

Lessons from Mary Parker Follett , Journal of Management History, Vol. 4,

No. 1, pp. 16-28.

159. Ellen S. OConnor (2000) , Decades ahead of her time : advancing

stakeholder theory through the ideas of Mary Parker Follett , Journal of

Management History, Vol.6, No. 4, pp. 167-190.

160. Melissa A. Schilling (2000) , Integrating Follett: history , philosophy and

management , Journal of Management History ,Vol.6, No. 5, pp. 224-242.

161. Mark Mendenhall and James Macomber and Marc Cutright (2000) , Mary

Parker Follett: prophet of chaos and complexity , Journal of Management

History, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 191-204.

162. Lori Verstegen Rayan and Matthew A. Rutherford (2000) , Mary Parker

Follett: individualist or collectivist or both , Journal of Management History,

Vol. 6, No.5, pp. 207-223.

163. Narendra K. Sethi (1962), Mary Parker Follett pioneer in management

theory ,J.A.M, December.

164. Camilla Stivers (2006), Integrating Mary Parker Follett and Public

Administration , Public Administration Review,May / June.

165. Richard Jung (1983) , The Structure of Social Action In Memory of Talcott

Parsons, the Systemgroep Nederland Conference on Problems of Actors and

Actions, Amsterdam NL, April 1983.

15

166. Bradby(2011) , SOCIAL THEORY AND THE SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH

AND MEDICINE , pp.21-40.

167. John Holmwood, Functionalism and its critics , Historical Developments and

theoretical approaches in Sociology , vol. 2.

168. Nicos Mouzelis , poststructural theories, Historical Developments and

theoretical approaches in Sociology , vol. 2.

169. Talcott Parsons (1951), The Social System , Collier – Macmilan Limited.

170. Talcott Parsons (1951), An Outline of the Social System , in: classical

sociology theory , by: C. Calthtun et al., Blackwell Publishing , 2007.

171. Paul J. DiMaggio and WALTER w. Powell (1983) , The Iron cage revisited :

institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields ,

American Sociological Review , vol. 48 , No. 2 , pp. 147 – 160.

172. W. Richard Scott (2004) , Institutional Theory: Contributing to a

Theoretical Research Program, Chapter prepared for Great Minds in

Management: The Process of Theory Development, Ken G. Smith and

Michael A. Hitt, eds. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

173. Philip Selznick (1996) , Institutionalism "Old" and "New" , Administrative

Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 2, 40th Anniversary Issue (Jun., 1996), pp.

270-277.

174. W. Richard Scott (1987) , The Adolescence of Institutional Theory ,

Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4. (Dec., 1987), pp. 493-511.

16

175. John Barton and Tim Haslett (2007) , Analysis, Synthesis, Systems Thinking

and the Scientific Method: Rediscovering the Importance of Open Systems ,

Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res. 24, 143-155 (2007).

176. Dante P. Martinelli (2001) , Systems Hierarchies and Management, Systems

Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res.18, 69-82 .

177. 101. Jennifer Wilby(2006) , An Essay on Kenneth E. Boulding‘s General

Systems Theory: The Skeleton of Science , Systems Research and Behavioral

Science Syst. Res. 23, 695-699.

178. Yan Zexian (2007) ,A New Approach to Studying Complex Systems ,Systems

Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res. 24, 403-416 .

179. Terence Love and Trudi Cooper(2007) , Complex built-environment design:

four extensions to Ashby , Kybernetes Vol. 36 No. 9/10, 2007.

180. Peter K. Manning (2008),Goffman on Organizations , Organization Studies ,

29(05) , 677–699.

181. Brian Whitworth (2009) , A Brief Introduction to Sociotechnical Systems ,

Copyright © 2009, IGI Global, distributing in print or electronic forms

without written permission of IGI IGI Global is prohibited.

182. BRUCE D. FRI EDMAN AND KAREN NEUMAN ALLEN , Systems

Theory, FRAMEWORKS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE.

183. A. H. Van Der Zwaan (1975) , the sociological systems approach: a critical

evaluation , Int. J. Prod. Res. , vol. 13 , No.2 , pp. 149 -163.

184. Thaddus E. Weckowicz (2000) , Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1901-1972): A

Pioneer of General Systems Theory, University of Alberta.

185. Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1950) , ―An Outline of General System Theory,‖

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Aug., 1950),

pp. 134-165.

186. W. ROSS ASHBY (1957) , AN INTRODUCTION TO YBERNETICS ,

CHAPMAN & HALL LTD.

187. Wolfgang Hofkirchner ,Ludwig von Bertalanffy Forerunner of Evolutionary

Systems Theory, University of Salzburg.

188. Charles François (1999) , Systemics and Cybernetics in a Historical

Perspective , Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst Res. 16, 203-219.

189. Alexander Laszlo and Stanley Krippner () , Systems Theories: Their Origins,

Foundations, and Development, J.S. Jordan (Ed.), Systems Theories and A

Priori Aspects of Perception. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1998. Ch. 3, pp.

47-74.

17

190. FRED LUTHANS (1973) , THE CONTINGENCY THEORY OF

MANAGEMENT:A path out of the jungle, BUSINESS HORIZONS the

University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

191. David J. Lemak (2004) , Leading students through the management theory

jungle by following the path of the seminal theorists :A paradigmatic

approach , Management Decision, Vol. 42, No. 10, pp. 1309-1325.

192. C. John Tarter and Wayne K. Hoy(1998) , Toward a contingency theory of

decision making , Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp.

212-228,

193. LEX DONALDSON ,The Normal Science of Structural Contingency Theory ,

HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATION STUDIES.

194. WESLEY D. SINE and HITOSHI MITSUHASHI and DAVID A. KIRSCH

(2006) , REVISITING BURNS AND STALKER: FORMAL STRUCTURE

AND NEW VENTURE PERFORMANCE IN EMERGING ECONOMIC

SECTORS, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1, 121–132.

195. Lex Donaldson , THE CONTINGENCY THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL

DESIGN: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES , The contingency

theory of organizational design.

196. Sang M. Lee and Fred Luthans and David L. Olson (1982), a management

science approach to contingency models of organizational , The Academy of

Management Journal , vol. 25 , No. 3, pp. 553 – 566.

18

197. Barbara Levitt and James G. March (1988) , Organizational Learning ,

Anuual Review of Sociology , vol. 14 , , pp.319 -340.

198. Zhang Jing and Faerman Sue R. (2003) , Divergent Approaches and

Converging Views: Drawing Sensible Linkages between Knowledge

Management and Organizational Learning , Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii

International Conference on System Sciences.

199. Abdel-Moteleb Abou-Bakr and Woodman Mark (2007) ,Towards a

Knowledge Management System Development Method: Critique of Some

Relevant Theories and Methodologies ,Journal of Information & Knowledge

Management, Vol. 6, No. 1 , pp.33–43.

200. Ingie Hovland (2003),Knowledge Management and Organisational

Learning: An International Development Perspective , London: Overseas

Development Institute.

201. Brenda Barker Scott (2011),Organizational Learning: A Literature Review ,

IRC Research Program.

202. Philip H. Mirvis (1996) , Historical foundations of organization learning ,

Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 13-31.

203. Peter Pawlowsky (2001),Management science and organizational learning ,

Dierkes, M.; Berthoin-Antal, A.; Child, J.; Nonaka, I. (Eds.): Handbook of

Organizational Learning and Knowledge , Oxford University Press.

204. Smith, M. K. (2001) 'Peter Senge and the learning organization', the

encyclopedia of informal education.

205. Svetlana Ńajeva (2010) , THE ANALYSIS OF KEY ELEMENTS OF

SOCIO-TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM,

ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 15.

206. Americo Nobre G.G. Amorim (2007) , Virtual Organization Theory: Current

Status and Demands , Amorim, A. N. G. G., in IFIP International Federation

for Information Processing, Volume 251, Integration and Innovation Orient

to E-Society Volume 1, Wang, W. (Eds), (Boston: Springer), pp. 1-8.

207. French Steven (2009) Critiquing the language of strategic management

,Journal of Management Development, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 6-17.

208. Chen H. Chung (1999) , It is the process: A philosophical foundation for

quality management, Total Quality Management, 10:2, 187-197.

19

209. Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, Andrew D. Brown and Linda L. Putnam (2006) ,

Introduction to the Special Issue ‗Making Sense of Organizing: in Honor of

Karl Weick‘, Organization Studies, 27(11),1573–1578.

210. Karl E. Weick, Kathleen M. Sutcliffe and David Obstfeld (2005) , Organizing

and the Process of Sensemaking , Organization Science ,Vol. 16, No. 4, pp.

409–421.

211. Terry L. Amburgey and Hayagreeva Rao (1996) , Organizational Ecology:

Past, Present, and Future Directions , The Academy of Management Journal,

Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 1265-1286.

212. JOEL A. C. BAUM AND ANDREW V. SHIPILOV (2006),Ecological

Approaches to Organizations , Handbook of Organization Studies by:Clegg.

213. Ruth C. Young (1988), Is population ecology a useful paradigm for the

study of organizations? ,The American Journal of Sociology , vol. 94 , No. 1 ,

pp. 1-24.

214. Jo Ann M. Pinto (2005), The Population Ecology Paradigm: Review And

Critique , Journal of Business & Economics Research , Volume 3, Number

10.

215. Michael T. Hannan and John Freeman (1977), The population ecology of

organizations ,The American Journal of Sociology , vol. 82, No. 5 , pp. 929-

964.

216. Peng Wen-shien (2008) , A CRITIQUE OF FRED W. RIGGS‘ ECOLOGY

OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION , International Public Management

Review ,Volume 9, Issue1, pp. 213-226.

217. Vincent Ferraro (1996) , Dependency Theory: An Introduction , Mount

Holyoke College , South Hadley.

218. Harriet Friedman and Jack Wayne (1977) , Dependency Theory : A Critique,

Canadian Journal of Sociology, vol. 2, No. 4, pp.399- 416.

219. Emerson Wagner Mainardes and Helena Alves and Mario Raposo (2011) ,

Stakeholder theory: issues to Resolve , Management Decision, Vol. 49, No. 2,

pp. 226-252.

220. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt (1989) ,Agency Theory: an assessment and review ,

The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57- 74.

21

PowerPoint