Philip A. Davidson, MD Heiden Davidson Orthopaedics 2012

Treating Injured Knees and Shoulders:Cartilage Restoration and

Joint Resurfacing offering solutions for patients of all ages

Philip A. Davidson, MDHeiden Davidson Orthopaedics

2012

Cartilage Restoration and Joint ResurfacingA wide realm between…..

Arthroscopic debridement Traditional TKA

The problem:29 y.o. mother of 3Former elite skier

Goals of Cartilage Restoration &Joint Resurfacing

– Relieve pain– Optimize function, sport

and activities– Improve mechanics– Long lasting – Prevent or limit future

degenerative dhanges– Retain future options

surgically – Principles extend to many

joints

Cartilage Restoration and Joint Resurfacing Treatments: …THE BIG PICTURE• Debridement (clean up)• Marrow stimulation• Biological Restoration

– Biologic grafts – Biosynthetics– Scaffolds– Cellular therapy

• Prosthetic Resurfacing– Metals and Plastics– Inlay Arthroplasty– Onlay Arthroplasty – Total Joint

Goal of Cartilage RestorationRestore Specialized Articular Cartilage

Marrow Stimulation • Techniques

- Drilling- Picking- Abrasion- Microfracture

• Marrow stimulation results:- Fibrocartilage

• Limited potential with increased age, injury chronicity

• Cheap, fast, easy – Short term efficacy seductive.

Biological Options

• Cell Therapy• Osteochondral Grafts

– Autogenous• Limited use

– Allograft• Juvenile Cartilage Grafts

– Minced grafts• Biologically Active

Scaffolds

Bone and Cartilage Grafts• Autograft (self donor)

– No donor needed– Limited availability– Small lesions only– Repair Broken Cartilage

• Allograft (OCA)– Human Donor– Very effective – Young patients– Handle Bone loss – Larger lesions

• Generally > 2 cm²

OCA– When is this done?• Larger defects • Deeper defects• Bone loss• Patellofemoral • Younger Patients• Osteochondritis• Otherwise healthy joint

OCA donor tissue

• Fresh Stored ( < 30 days)• Germ Surveillance• Donor Testing/Screening • Limited Availability• Expensive• No game day decisions• No anti-rejection drugs

OCA- Procedure

What if biologics will not or cannot work? …too large, no longer “young”, obese, smoking,

……..Or just plain worn out

Prosthetics - Joint Resurfacing

Biologic or Prosthetic Resurfacing ????

Key decision making point• Multifactoral decision

– Lesion/Cartilage nearby– Patient Factors – Age (biological)– Comorbidities– Joint Status – Resources

Decision Making – Bio vs. ProstheticJoint Shape

• Biologic Solutions are less likely to work in joint which has lost shape or is “crooked”

Transitional thinking from biologics to prosthetics

• Once planning progresses to resurfacing need conceptual framework

1. Inlay2. Onlay3. Bone sacrificing

( traditional)

Inlay Joint Resurfacing

Inlay Resurfacing • Accommodates different

shapes and sizes • Intraoperative surface

mapping• Preserves anatomy,

minimal bone resection• Ways to think about

Inlay:– “filling a cavity” – “new tiles on the floor”– “patching a tire”

Inlay Resurfacing: Anatomical Reconstruction

• Accommodate complicated curvatures

• Minimally invasive procedure allows for other reconstructions at same time

• Inlay Arthroplasty is stable • Accounts for different sizes

and shapes of persons and joints

Inlay – Contoured Articular Prosthesis

• Geometry based on patient’s native anatomy

• Intraoperative joint mapping

• Account for complex asymmetrical geometry

• Extension of biological resurfacing

Inlay- Platform Technology

• Multiple Joints• Multiple sizes and

shapes• Metallic Inlay in

conjunction with stud or set-screw

• Poly (special plastic) Technology uses cement in socket

Patellofemoral (knee cap joint) Inlay Resurfacing • Trochlea alone or Bipolar • Traditional prostheses

limited success and rarely used

• Inlay device allows for realignment easily, as no overstuffing

• Inlay device can handle very advanced PF DJD and morphologic variability

Traditional PFA

Inlay PFA

Case # 1 – 42 year old female

Case #1

Inlay Unicompartmental resurfacing arthroplasty

aka….UniCAP™scope assisted Uni, AKR , etc..

Cementation

UniCAP case example – medial knee resurfacing 46 year old cyclist

UniCAP – medial knee resurfacing

Minimum 5-year results of focal articular prosthetic resurfacingfor the treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage defectsin the knee. Becher, C. et.al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg . DOI 10.1007/s00402-011-1323-4. June, 2011.

• 21 patients, mean age 54 yrs, minimum f-u 5 yrs, small focal unipolar lesions• KOOS scores improved significantly (P < 0.005)

– pain (51.1 to 77.6), – symptoms (57.9 to 79.5),– ADL (58.8 to 82.4), – Sports (26.3 to 57.8)

• Tegner activity level– improved significantly (P< 0.02) from 2.9 to 4.

• SF-36(physical) increased by 15.2 to 46.9 compared to the preoperative value• 16/21 of the would have the operation again. • Radiographic results:

– solid fixation, preservation of joint space and no change in the osteoarthritic stage.

Inlay Shoulder Resurfacing

ANATOMIC INLAY RESURFACING FOR GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS

Clinical Results in a Consecutive Case Series

Shoulder Resurfacing Study-Patient Population

• N = 48– Males – 29– Female – 19

• Mean age at surgery– 61 years

• Follow-up– 3 years

HemiCAP in OA • Concurrent Procedures– Rotator Cuff Repair

• 12– Subacromial Decompression

• 25– Distal Clavicle Resection

• 23– Biceps Tenodesis

• 2– Biceps Tenotomy

• 21– Capsulolabral Repair

• 5– Hardware Removal

• 1

Simple Shoulder Test

VAS Pain

NO reported loosening of implant in the shoulder

No signs of

- Device disengagement- Progressive

periprosthetic radiolucency

- Implant subsidence

Osteoarthritis treatment: Resurfacing!

• Removal of bone spurs

• Soft tissue releases• Treat ALL conditions

of shoulder

CONCLUSIONS Shoulder Resurfacing with HemiCAP for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

• Short term (3 year) results very encouraging

• Restoration of native anatomy

• Comprehensive pathology treatment is key

• Excellent option for primary OA of Shoulder

Combining Inlay and Onlay Technologies

Case #232 year old female rancher

• Neutral alignment

• Told she needed a TKA

• Healthy, ideal body weight

Radiographs

Resurfacing & Alignment• Must know alignment,

potentially correct or accommodate with resurfacing

• Must have long leg standing films available

• Inlay does not restore joint height

• Onlay can offer more joint height restoration

Onlay Resurfacing ArthroplastyA Uni or Partial by any other name???

• Onlay optimizes fit of implant to bone

• Onlay minimizes bone resection

• Onlay accounts for alignment and patient specific anatomy using pre-op data acquisition

Onlay Resurfacing • Very little bone cut off• Implants custom

made from CT scan• More accurate fit may

increase longevity• Accommodate

morphologic variability, “odd sizes and shapes”

Case #4Onlay

Biologic Treatment - Injured Worker

Prosthetic Resurfacing Procedures

• Outpatient or one night stay

• Full WB immediately• Full ROM immediately• Appropriate for

“younger” patients and high demand boomers

Updating Traditional TKA• Pre op limb imaging can yield data about bone shape , size

and alignment• Alignment, sizing and intended corrections can be

precisely calculated preoperatively • This digital information can be used to plan, create cutting

guides and manufacture implants• Increases precision• Increases efficiency by: decreasing OR time, instruments,

and inventory • May lessen or obviate the need for intraoperative

navigation systems• Saves time and money while potentially making

outcomes more predictable and ultimately better.

Updating Traditional TKA

• Pre-op templated cutting guides/blocks

• Avoid/minimize intraoperative intra and extra medullary alignment guides

• These traditional guides can be used as “double-check”

Updating Traditional TKA

• Bicruciate preserving resurfacing devices

• Onlay 3 compartments

• Pre-commercial prototype

Closing thoughts…..Joint Resurfacing

• Excellent Option for many, but not all, patients

• Retain future options – as much as possible– Resurfacing may be a

bridging procedure• Maximize Outcomes

– Equal, or better than traditional treatments

• Offering additional options to patients that may have had few alternatives to Total Joint

Future Trends– “Geographic” , biologic , or

large area contoured resurfacing for DJD

– Combining biologics with prosthetics

– Enhanced biomaterials for resurfacing implants, nanotechnology

– Decreasing the time and costs associated with patient specific implants and instruments

– Both patient demand and cost containment will drive the need for more precise, less invasive joint resurfacing

Thank You [email protected]

Office: 435-615-8822www.orthoparkcity.com

Philip A. Davidson, MD Heiden Davidson Orthopaedics 2012

Documents

Transcript of Philip A. Davidson, MD Heiden Davidson Orthopaedics 2012