PHD Work

14
J.E. Garcia RTN – December 03 PHD Work PHD Work SCT beam test analysis: Tracking efficiency, noise occupancy, collected charge, S/N but also several studies: tracking with standalone SCT, dependencies on incidence angle, studies with LHC-like bunch structuring…

description

PHD Work. J.E. Garcia. RTN – December 03. 2. Typical SCT beam test setup with different types of modules. Setup. Scintillator Trigger. Telescopes. Telescopes. 180 GeV pion Beam. Light tight, thermally insulating box. Modules inside the beam test box. J. E. Garcia. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of PHD Work

J.E. Garcia RTN – December 03

PHD WorkPHD Work

SCT beam test analysis:Tracking efficiency, noise occupancy, collected charge, S/N but also several studies: tracking with standalone SCT, dependencies on incidence angle, studies with LHC-like bunch structuring…

Light tight, thermally insulating box

Telescopes

180 GeV pion Beam

Telescopes

Scintillator Trigger

Modules inside the beam test box.

SetupSetup 2

SCT Beam test results

Typical SCT beam test setup with different types of modules

J. E. Garcia RTN – December 03

Variation of efficiency and noise occupancy with comparator threshold. Horizontal lines are the ATLAS specifications.

• After 10 years the SCT will receive up to 2·1014 neq/cm2. Radiation causes damage on the module.

– Radiation creates defects – Type inversion – Electronics noise and leakage current increase

• Resolution is measured. SCT modules are almost single-strip. The detector pitch is 80 m in order to avoid charge sharing and preserve a good resolution.

Beam test studiesBeam test studies 3

SCT Beam test results

~ 23 m

J. E. Garcia RTN – December 03

• The Lorentz angle has been measured using a 1.56 T magnet and different incidence angles. The most sensitive parameter to these changes is the cluster size

L = 3.3 º 0.3 º (at 150 V)

Beam test… (II)Beam test… (II) 4

SCT Beam test results

• Signal to noise ratio for the SCT modules is 14.

• The median charge observed on binary SCT prototypes is around 3.4 0.2 fC

S-Curve

J. E. Garcia RTN – December 03

The pulse shape can be reconstructed from beam test data and compared with the theoretical response of the shaper

• For reconstructing tracks only the position measurements of the irradiated SCT modules are used. The beam telescope is only read out for comparison. Example of a reconstructed event

SCT ModulesTelescope

Tracking studyTracking study 5

SCT Beam test resultsJ. E. Garcia RTN – December 03

effic

ienc

y• The tracking efficiency depends on threshold. The maximum efficiency is 97 % obtained at a threshold of 1.2 fC for a bias over 450 V.

• Fake rate is kept below 10-3 independent of the bias voltage on the detector.

J.E. Garcia RTN – December 03

PHD WorkPHD Work

SCT beam test analysis:Tracking efficiency, noise occupancy, collected charge, S/N but also several studies: tracking with standalone SCT, dependencies on incidence angle, studies with LHC-like bunch structuring…

Little Higgs Searches:Capability of the ATLAS detector to find particles predicted by the Little Higgs Models. In particular new gauge bosons in the channels: WH W H and ZH Z H

Particle SpectrumParticle Spectrum

Little Higgs Searches

7

0,+,++

WH , ZH

T

AH1 TeV

Z ,Wh

t

M

scalar sector gauge sector

topsector

v’ ’ 1

new couplings

J. E. Garcia RTN – December 03

Littlest Higgs modelSU(5) SO(5)Gauge sector [SU2U1]2

Only 1 Higgs doubletOnly 1 Higgs doublet

• Arkani-Hamed et al., JHEP 207 (2002) 34

Phenomenology

• Han et al., Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 95004• Burdman, Perelstein, Pierce,hep-ph/0212228

Strategies at LHC 8

q

W

b T

q’

q’

q1

W+

q2

q’

W+

1

2

++q

q

ZH

++++ TT ZH

VBF mechanismVBF mechanism (v’)2

v’ should be small ++ WW++WW++

large SM bkglarge SM bkg

Wb fusionWb fusion (1)2

1 1 but

suppressed by b-quark PDF.

T bW, bW, ttZZ clear signalclear signal

qq annihilationqq annihilation (cot)2

Wide range in cot possible.ZH

ee++ee--

clear signal

Little Higgs SearchesJ. E. Garcia RTN – December 03

ZH Zh with h bb 9

hh

ZH

ZZ

l +

l -

bbbb

2 TeVhh

bb

bbZH

ZZ

l +

l -

1 TeV

Cuts

Background: Z + jets

Cuts

|| < 2.5 (jets and leptons)

PT(Z) > 250 GeVPT(h) > 250 GeVb-tagging

|| < 2.5 (jets and leptons)

PT(Z) > 500 GeV PT(h) > 500 GeV b-tagging

Little Higgs SearchesJ. E. Garcia RTN – December 03

Signal and background 10

b-tag: b = 40%, Ru = 100 Inside mass window:S = 15 SB = 8 B

= 5

b-tag: b = 50%, Ru = 100 Inside mass window:S = 195 SB = 16 B

= 50

M(ZH) (GeV)

MZ = 1 TeVH

M(ZH) (GeV)

MZ = 2 TeV

H

L = 3·105 pb-1

cot = 0.5L = 3·105 pb-1

cot = 0.5

Eve

nts

Eve

nts

Little Higgs SearchesJ. E. Garcia RTN – December 03

Discovery region ZDiscovery region ZH H Zh Zh 11

L = 3·105 pb-1

S/B > 5 N > 10

h(120) bb

ZH Zh l +l - bbWH Wh l bb

Little Higgs SearchesJ. E. Garcia RTN – December 03

J.E. Garcia RTN – December 03

PHD WorkPHD Work

SCT beam test analysis:Tracking efficiency, noise occupancy, collected charge, S/N but also several studies: tracking with standalone SCT, dependencies on incidence angle, studies with LHC-like bunch structuring…

Little Higgs Searches:Capability of the ATLAS detector to find particles predicted by the Little Higgs Models. In particular new gauge bosons in the channels: WH W H and ZH Z H

b-tagging studies:b-tagging performance of the ATLAS detector for high pT jets applied to the Little searches and for the benchmark channels W H(120) and W H(400). Using the signed impact parameter b-tagging algorithms.

mh = 200 GeV

BR(h W+W-) =

74 %BR(h ZZ) = 26

%

ZH Zh 13

q

q

cot cot 2

(cot cot 2) 2

(cot )

(cot = 0.5) mh = 120 GeV

BR(h bb) = 66

%BR(h ) = 0.2

%

ZH

hh

ZZ

Rat

io

0.5

Little Higgs SearchesJ. E. Garcia RTN – December 03

b-tagging 14

< pT (b)> = 220 GeV < pT (bb)> = 800 GeV

115

0.5

MZ = 1 TeVH

MZ = 2 TeVH

~ 100

0.4

Little Higgs SearchesJ. E. Garcia RTN – December 03