Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

41
Phase Stability 1

Transcript of Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

Page 1: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

Phase Stability

1

Page 2: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

DG = DH – T DS

Supercool/Superheat/Supersaturate

At the equilibrium m elting /freezing point or equilibrium

concentration for precipitation the driving force for phase

separation, DG = DH – T DS = 0. So a phase will only form by

lowering the tem perature below the m elting point or increasing

the concentration above the solubility lim it. This is related to

“critical slowing down”. At the critical point nothing happens, or

anything can happen, there is no therm odynam ic direction for

the process.

Cooling below the m elting point produces a supercooled liquid,

raising the concentration above the saturation lim it produces a

supercritical solution. You can also heat a solid above the

equilibrium m elting point and produce a superheated solid.

The rate of phase separation depends on two factors:

DG and kinetics. Kinetics slows exponentially at lower

tem peratures D ~ exp(K/(T-T0)). The therm odynam ic driving

force, exp(-DG/kT), decays at higher tem peratures, so a

m axim um in grow th rate results below the equilibrium in the

super cooled liquid state.

2

Page 3: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

Kauzm ann Paradox, a therm odynam ic basis for the glass transition

The entropy of the liquid becom es sm aller than the entropy of the

solid at the Kauzm anntem perature, TK. This could be the infinite cooling glass transition tem perature.

3

Page 4: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

Superheating and M eltingSuperheating can occur since m elting occurs at surfaces and if the surfaces are stabilized then superheated solids can be produced

Grow th of a liquid phase relies on grow th of a m echanical instabilityA m echanical instability w ill not spontaneously grow if it occurs in a m eta-stable region in T and P:(dG/dx)=0 defines equilibrium or binodal; (d2G/dx2) = 0 defines the m etastable lim it or spinodal(d3G/dx3) = 0 defines the critical point

G = -ST + Vp, dG = -SdT + Vdp(d2G/dp2)T = (dV/dp)T < 0 and (d2G/dT2)p = -(dS/dT)p < 0

First requires that the bulk m odulus be positive,

Second requires positive heat capacity, (dS/dT)p = Cp/T > 0

Shear m odulus goes to 0 at

highest possible supercritical solid

4

Page 5: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

Therm al (energy) fluctuations are the basis of therm odynam ics

M ap of energy in 3d space at one tim e slice

https://upload.wikim edia.org /wikipedia/com m ons/2/2a/Quantum _Fluctuations.gif

Therm odynam ic Hypothesis:

System s are always probing free energy space (tem perature, com position, pressure, m agnetic field, electrical field, energy, extent of reaction, etc.) through random fluctuations. This

enables the attainm ent of the lowestfree energy at an equilibrium state.

This hypothesis leads to consideration of the partial derivatives of free energy

as defining features in free energy space particularly critical points (d3G/dx3=0; d2G/dx2=0; dG/dx=0), equilibrium (binodal) points (dG/dx=0), and spinodal points (d2G/dx2=0).

5

Page 6: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

The book considers first a reversible chem ical reaction A <=> BCyclohexane from boat to chair conform ation for instance

As tem perature changes you can observer a different m ix of states, E = kBT ~ 2.5 kJ/m ole at RTBut fluctuations allow for 0.1 % boat conform ation. At 1073K 30% boat. Probability is exp(-E/kT).

The percent in boat can be m easured using NM R spectroscopy.

Chair Chair

Boat

TransitionState

M etastable

TransitionState

The equilibrium point depends on tem perature,

kBT

6

Page 7: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

Extent of reaction would be the conversion from chair (A) to boat (B), for instance, at a tem perature T. The m inim um , (dG/dx) = 0 is the equilibrium

point. The free energy plot can be concave up (stable equilibrium ) concave down (unstable), flat (critical point/tem perature), and other shapes

A <=> B

Gibbs-Duhem Equation

Affinity

At tem perature T, the reaction is like a spring bouncing between

A and B oscillating about the equilibrium point since any deviation from equilibrium increases the free energy.

7

Page 8: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

8

a) Stable dG/dx = 0b) Unstable

c) Spinodal d2G/dx2 = 0d) M etastable (This can depend on your vantage point)

Page 9: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

9

Affinity as a Taylor series in the reaction coordinate

z is a fluctuation in a reaction coordinate, T, p, m , x , etc.

At equilibrium the affinity is 0 so = 0

If then the equilibrium is stable

Page 10: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

10

Construction of a Phase Diagram Based on Fluctuations

Consider the Hildebrand M odel

Binodal phase equilibria is defined by

xA = 1-xB

Spinodal is defined by

Critical Point is defined by

d3G m/dxB3 = RT(1/(1-xB)2 - 1/xB2) = 0 or xA = xB = 0.5

Using this com position in d2G m/dxB2 = 0 yields

Page 11: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

11

Hildebrand Equation

Page 12: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

12

If W = -A + BT, and the entropy term is sm all (for polym ers for instance) B is non-com binatorial entropyPhase separation occurs on heating: Lower Critical Solution Tem perature (LCST)

Flory-Huggins Equation

fA is the volum e fraction of AN A is the num ber of “c” units in A

nc is the total num ber of c volum e units in the systemC is an average of A and B unitsVolum e fraction has replace m ole fractionc is an average interaction energy per c site per RT

c ~ W /RT

Sym m etric blend N A = N B

Entropy part is sm all since N i ~ 100,000c ~ a - b/T leads to LCST behavior, a is non-com binatorial entropy, b is the enthalpy of specific

interactions that leads to m iscibilty

2 Phase

1 Phase

Page 13: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

13

Since cN depends on 1/T specifying cN specifies the tem perature. Large cN is low tem pearature.

Page 14: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

14

Page 15: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

15

Joon Roe

Page 16: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

16

Spinodal

BB

Page 17: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

17

Spinodal

BB

Page 18: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

18

Page 19: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

19

Higgins JS, Cabral JT A Thorny

Problem? Spinodal Decomposition in Polymer Blends M acromolecules 534137−4140 (2020)

Page 20: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

20

Series expansion of the free energy density yields,

Positive second derivative leads to increase (Stable)Negative to decrease (Phase Separation)

Page 21: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

21

Diffusion in Nucleation and Grow th and in Spinodal Decom position

Fickian diffusion down a concentration gradient

Spinodal diffusion up a concentration gradient driven by free energy

Page 22: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

22

Phase grows from fluctuations

Higgins JS, Cabral JT A Thorny Problem? Spinodal Decomposition in Polymer Blends M acromolecules 53 4137−4140 (2020)

Page 23: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

23

Activation Barrier for Nucleation and Growth

Balance between bulk and surfaceFree energies

(Next chapter)

Different relative bulk to surface free

energies (sm all to large)

Rate of Nucleation

Page 24: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

24

Critical Scattering

A polym er chain in a m elt is a

random walk like a diffusion

path so M ass ~ size2

By Bragg ’s law size is related to

inverse angle

d = 2/(l sinq)

Reduced angle is q = 4p/l sinqIntensity (S) scales with M ass

So S ~ q-2

Then a plot of 1/S vs q2 should

be a line that reflects the

inverse of contrast at q = 0

At the critical point contrast

goes to ∞ so 1/S goes to 0.

Deuteration provides contrast

for neutrons, l = 10Å.

Page 25: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

25

Page 26: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

26

Page 27: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

27

Page 28: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

28

Page 29: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

29

Page 30: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

30

Page 31: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

31

Page 32: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

32

Page 33: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

33

Page 34: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

34

Page 35: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

35

Page 36: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

36

Page 37: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

37

Page 38: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

38

Page 39: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

39

Page 40: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

40

Page 41: Phase Stability - University of Cincinnati

41