Phase 2 of new ARVs TAF (TFV prodrug) - Study 292-0102 - Study 299-0102.
Transcript of Phase 2 of new ARVs TAF (TFV prodrug) - Study 292-0102 - Study 299-0102.
Phase 2 of new ARVsTAF (TFV prodrug)
- Study 292-0102- Study 299-0102
Design
Objective– Primary endpoint : non inferiority of D/C/F/TAF at W24: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL
by intention to treat, snapshot analysis (lower margin of the 2 sided 95% CI for the difference = -12%)
– Secondary endpoints : HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48, safety, tolerability
D/C/F/TAF STR 800/150/200/10 mg QD
DRV 400 mg x 2 + COBI + F/TDF placebos QD
DRV 400 mg x 2 + COBI 150 mg + F/TDF 200/300 mg QD
D/C/F/TAF STR QD placebo
Randomisation*2 : 1
Double-blind
Adults ≥ 18 yearsARV-naïve
HIV RNA > 5,000 c/mLCD4 cell count >
50/mm3
eGFR ≥ 70 mL/minSensitive to DRV,
FTC and TDF
* Randomisation was stratified by HIV RNA (< or > 100,000 c/mL) and race (black or nonblack)
Study GS-US-299-0102: D/C/F/TAF QD STR vs DRV + COBI + F/TDF QD
N = 50
N = 100
W24 W48
Mills A, JAIDS 2015,epub ahead of printGS-US-299-0102
D = darunavir ; C = cobicistat ; F = FTC
D/C/F/TAFN = 103
DRV + COBI + F/TDFN = 50
Median age, years 31 36
Female 8% 6%
Black 35% 34%
HIV RNA (log10 c/mL), median 4.7 4.6
HIV RNA > 100,000 c/mL 22% 14%
CD4 cell count (/mm3), median 368 433
CD4 < 200 per mm3 10.7% 20%
eGFR (Cockroft-Gault), mL/min, median 116 110
Discontinuation by W48 19 (18%) 8 (16%)
For investigator’s discretion 1 0
For adverse event 2 2
Lost to follow-up / Withdrew consent 10 / 4 4 / 2
Non-compliance 2 0
Baseline characteristics and patient disposition
Study GS-US-299-0102: D/C/F/TAF QD vs DRV + COBI + F/TDF QD
Mills A, JAIDS 2015,epub ahead of printGS-US-299-0102
Response to treatmentHIV RNA < 50 c/mL, ITT, snapshot analysis
D/C/F/TAF DRV + COBI + F/TDF
171/196
174/195
96/112
104/117
703/753
680/750
25
50
100
7574.8 74.0
%
Adjusted difference(95% CI) =
3.3% (- 11.4 ; 18.1)
76.784.0
Primary analysis, W24(Overall)
0
W48
Adjusted difference(95% CI) =
-6.2% (- 19.9 ; 7.4)
D/C/F/TAF DRV + COBI+ F/TDF
Virologic failure 16% 12%
No data 8% 4%
Outcome at W48
D/C/F/TAF DRV + COBI+ F/TDF
W24 + 186 + 139
W48 + 231 + 212
p : not significant
CD4/mm3 response
Study GS-US-299-0102: D/C/F/TAF QD vs DRV + COBI + F/TDF QD
Mills A, JAIDS 2015,epub ahead of printGS-US-299-0102
Study GS-US-299-0102: D/C/F/TAF QD vs DRV + COBI + F/TDF QD
D/C/F/TAFN = 103
DRV + COBI + F/TDF N = 50
Virologic failure 6 (5.8%) 2 (4%)
No emergence of resistance to TDF, FTC or DRV
Criteria for resistance testing– Confirmed virologic failure : 2 consecutive HIV RNA > 50 c/mL and an HIV
RNA > 400 c/mL at or after W8– Second, confirmatory, sample, tested for resistance
Resistance data at week 48
Mills A, JAIDS 2015,epub ahead of printGS-US-299-0102
D/C/F/TAF DRV + COBI + F/TDFGrade 3-4 AE 6.8% 8.0%
AEs (all grades) in ≥ 10% of patients in either group
Diarrhea 21.4% 26%
Upper respiratory tract infection 15.5% 14%
Fatigue 13.6% 18%
Nausea 12.6% 10%
Rash 11.7% 8%
Flatulence 4.9% 12%
Pain in extremity 7.8% 10%
Vitamin D deficiency 1.9% 10%
Vomiting 3.9% 10%
Serious AEs 4.9% 4.0%
AE leading to discontinuationN = 2Rash;
Substance dependance
N = 2Worsening of diarrhea ;
Proximal renal tubulopathy
Study GS-US-299-0102: D/C/F/TAF QD vs DRV + COBI + F/TDF QD
Adverse events by W48
Mills A, JAIDS 2015,epub ahead of printGS-US-299-0102
Renal outcome at W48D/C/F/TAF DRV + COBI + F/TDF P
Mean (95% CI) change from baseline in creatinine, mg/dL
+ 0.06 (0.04 - 0.08) + 0.09 (0.05 - 0.14) 0.053
Median decrease in eGFR (Cockroft-Gault), mL/min
-2.9 -10.6 0.017
Median change in urine retinol binding protein/creatinine ratio, mg/g
+ 9% + 54% 0.003
Median change in urine beta-2 microglobulin/creatinine ratio, mg/g
-42% +2.3% 0.002
Median change in urine albumin/creatinine ratio, mg/g
-13.1%-22.6%
0.17
Median change in urine protein/creatinine ratio, mg/g
-8.22% -27.52%0.19
Median change in fractional excretion of phosphates
+ 2.4% + 1.8% ns
Emergent dipstick proteinuria 32% 34% ns
Study GS-US-299-0102: D/C/F/TAF QD vs DRV + COBI + F/TDF QD
Mills A, JAIDS 2015,epub ahead of printGS-US-299-0102
Mean percentage change from baseline in bone mineral density (DEXA)Total hip Lumbar spine
-0.53-0.84
-2.09
-3.82
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
P < 0.001 P < 0.001
W24 W48
-1.09-1.57-3.82
-3.62
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
P < 0.001 P = 0.003
W24 W48
Bone sub-study outcome at W48D/C/F/TAF DRV + COBI + F/TDF P
BMD decline > 3% in hip 18.3% 61.7% < 0.001
BMD decline > 3% in lumbar spine 32.5% 55.3% 0.002
P1NP (bone formation) increase + 4.7% + 52.5% < 0.001
CTx (bone resorption) increase + 23.2% + 74.4% < 0.001
P1NP : pro-collagen Type 1 N-terminal propeptide ; CTx : C-terminal telopeptide
Study GS-US-299-0102: D/C/F/TAF QD vs DRV + COBI + F/TDF QD
Mills A, JAIDS 2015,epub ahead of printGS-US-299-0102
D/C/F/TAFDRV + COBI + F/TDF
Median change in fasting metabolic parameters at Week 48
D/C/F/TAF DRV + COBI + F/TDF P
Total cholesterol, mg/dL + 40 + 5 < 0.001
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL + 26 + 4 < 0.001
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL + 7 + 3 0.009
Total cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio 0.0 -0.2 0.15
Triglycerides, mg/dL + 29 -5 0.007
Serum glucose, mg/dL + 5 + 7 0.33
Initiation of lipid lowering agent by W48 6.8% 8%
Study GS-US-299-0102: D/C/F/TAF QD vs DRV + COBI + F/TDF QD
Mills A, JAIDS 2015, epub ahead of printGS-US-299-0102
Study GS-US-299-0102: D/C/F/TAF QD vs DRV + COBI + F/TDF QD
Mills A, JAIDS 2015,epub ahead of printGS-US-299-0102
Conclusion– D/C/F/TAF had significantly improved renal and bone safety
parameters than DRV + COBI + F/TDF in antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-1 infected subjects :
• Less proteinuria• Less change in hip and spine BMD
– Study limitations• Small sample size• Each participant had to take 5 tablets (double-blind) not optimal for
patient’s adherence and retention in the study• Few women enrolled
– This D/C/F/TAF STR offers a promising option for initial HIV treatment, with
• The high barrier to resistance of DRV• And the potential for improved long-term renal and bone safety with TAF