Peter Winch portfolio_01-17

21
URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN PORTFOLIO PETER WINCH 2017 resources, patterns, transformations

Transcript of Peter Winch portfolio_01-17

  • URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN PORTFOLIOPETER WINCH2017

    resources, patterns, t ransformat ions

  • December 2016 Tashiding, India

    resources, patterns, t ransformations

    What are the assets of a place and its region? What patterns can be uncovered at the scale of the block, the neighborhood, the city?How can limited resources be used to produce multiple and valuable public benefits? I seek to shape places and guide development in a way that sustains cities as functional, beautiful, and humane.

    contents

    ABU DHABI - Public Realm Implementation StrategyApril 2009

    DETROIT - Cobo ConfluenceApril 2007

    Station Area Planning

    Waterfront

    Growth AlternativesTURLOCK - General Plan UpdateDecember 2009

    TASHIDING - Hotel PemaDecember 2016

    Urban Intensif icationSAN DIEGO - Mission Valley Community PlanApril 2016

    PALMDALE - TOD Framework PlanDecember 2015

    Parks and TrailsPACIFICA - General Plan/Local Coastal PlanMarch 2014

    KOLKATA - MaharajDecember 2016

    Drawings

    Public Realm

    Corridor Revital ization

    VENICE - Venice for TomorrowNovember 2006

    Citywide Vision

    CHICAGO - Garfield Boulevard: Vital ChicagoDecember 2006

    SchoolsPORTLAND - Schools, Families, HousingJune 2008

    MUMBAI - Mumbai Mill LandsDecember 2005

    NEW ENGLAND - Rethinking FreewaysDecember 2005/Ongoing

    Studies

  • Existing Conditions and Opportunities on Large SitesWestfield Mission Valley, Westfield Mission Valley West, and Park Valley CenterFenton Marketplace

    Dyett & Bhatia was selected by the City of San Diego to lead the commu-nity plan update for Mission Valley, a major transportation corridor and a regional retail cluster. Centered along the San Diego River and a Trolley line, the community has great promise for ecological enhancement, recreation, and higher-intensity urban develop-ment.

    Our map-based analysis of existing conditions and investigation of key issues, published in separate reports in early 2016, coverr a broad range of topics. Our studies of the potential for urban-scale development on large retail commercial sites is summarized here.

    Diagrams produced collaboratively with Angela Wang and Mark Chambers at D&B.

    San Diego April 2016Mission Valley Community Plan Update

    URBAN

    IN

    TEN

    SIF

    ICAT

    ION

    San

    Die

    go

  • 23

    UPTOWN

    LINDA VISTA

    SERRA MESA

    CLAIREMONTMESA

    GREATERNORTH

    PARK

    MID-CITY:CITY HEIGHTS

    TIERRASANTA

    MID-CITY:NORMAL HEIGHTS

    KEARNYMESA

    NAVAJO

    MID-CITY:KENSINGTON-

    TALMADGE

    MissionBayPark

    MissionBay

    EL CAJON BLVD

    38TH

    ST

    ADAMS AVEADAMS AVE

    I-5 I-8

    I-805

    I-15

    163

    163

    15

    I-8

    FRIARS RD

    QU

    ALCO

    MM

    WY

    LINDA

    VIST

    A RD

    ULRIC ST

    MO

    REN

    A B

    LVD

    EL CAJON BLVD

    TEXA

    S ST

    MIS

    SIO

    N C

    ENTE

    R RD

    JUAN ST

    W WASHINGTON ST

    MISSIO

    N VILLAGE DR

    SAN DIEGO MISSION RD

    ROSE

    CRAN

    S ST

    SUNSET BLVDFA

    SHIO

    N VA

    LLEY RD

    UNIVERSITY AVE

    PARK

    BLV

    D

    GENESEEAV

    E

    LINDA V

    ISTAR D

    NAPA ST

    FRIA

    RSRD

    MU

    RRAY

    RID

    GE

    RD

    CA M DELA RE

    INA

    CLAIREM

    O N

    TD

    R

    FRIARS R

    D

    30TH

    ST

    VI

    A LAS

    CU

    MBR

    ES

    MORENA BLVD

    EAST

    MIS

    SIO

    N B

    AY D

    R

    CAM

    DEL R

    IO NORT

    H

    MADISON AVE

    MIS

    SIO

    NG

    ORG

    ERD

    43RD

    ST

    44TH

    ST

    45TH

    ST

    MEADE AVE

    35TH

    ST

    MADISON AVE

    IDA

    HO

    ST ORANGE AVE

    OH

    IO S

    T

    COW

    LEY WAY

    KAN

    SAS

    ST

    MILTON ST

    HOWARD AVE

    DEN

    VER

    ST

    OSLER ST

    HA

    MIL

    TON

    ST

    GEO

    RGIA

    ST

    POLK AVE

    COM

    STOCK ST

    FULTON ST

    HAW

    LEY

    BLVD

    MONROE AVE

    MIS

    SISS

    IPPI

    ST

    RONDA AVE

    32N

    D S

    T

    36TH

    ST

    PINE ST

    GREY

    LIN

    G D

    R

    CIVITA

    BLVD

    ILLI

    ON

    ST

    41ST

    ST

    MEL

    BOUR

    NE D

    R

    39TH

    ST

    MA

    RYLA

    ND

    ST

    CAM

    PUS

    AVE

    TRIA

    S ST

    IBIS

    ST

    GRAN

    DVIEW

    ST

    LAURETTA ST

    KELLY ST

    CONGRESS ST

    COLU

    SA ST

    CANT

    ERBU

    RY D

    R

    PHYLLIS PL

    SANTO

    RD

    IRVINGTON A

    VE

    FRAZEE RD

    CAMIN

    O D

    EL ESTE

    ARBOR DR

    MADISON AVE

    POLK AVE32N

    D S

    T

    IOW

    A S

    T

    42N

    D S

    T

    34TH

    ST

    37TH

    ST

    LINCOLN AVE

    GESNER ST

    LITTLEFIELD ST

    DORC

    AS ST

    W MONTECITO WAY

    RIOS A

    NDI

    EGO

    DR

    GLIDDEN ST

    MA

    RLBO

    ROU

    GH

    DR

    FALC

    ON

    ST

    FORT STOCKTON DR

    W LEWIS ST

    KURTZ ST

    FI

    ELD

    ST

    GA

    LVES

    TON

    ST

    BURG

    ENER BLVD

    FAIR

    MO

    UN

    T AV

    E

    FENTON PKY

    SEA W

    OR

    LDD

    RIV

    E

    !"#

    #$%#

    FRANKLIN RIDGE RD

    MISSIONVALL EY R D

    RiverwalkGolf Course

    QualcommStadium

    Fig 2-5: Potential Opportunity Sites

    0 3,000 6,0001,500

    FEET

    Data Source: City of San Diego, 2015; SANGIS Regional GIS DataWarehouse, 2015. (www.sangis.org)Dyett & Bhatia, 2015

    This map/data is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressor implied, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of mercantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Note: This product may contain information from the SANDAG RegionalInformation System which cannot be reproduced without the writtenpermission of SANDAG. This product may contain information reproduced with permission granted by RAND MCNALLY & COMPANYto SanGIS. This map is copyrighted by RAND MCNALLY & COMPANY.It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether forpersonal use or resale, without the prior, written permission of RAND MCNALLY & COMPANY.

    Copyright SanGIS 2009 - All Rights Reserved. Full text of this legal noticecan be found at: http://www.sangis.org/Legal_Notice.htm

    Trolley Stops

    Light Rail

    Freeways

    Ramps

    Streams/Creeks

    Opportunity Sites

    Vacant/Undeveloped Parcels

    Low Assessed Value Ratio (< 0.75)

    Medium Assessed Value Ratio (0.75 - 1.5)

    Low Floor Area Ratio (< 0.35)

    Medium Floor Area Ratio (0.35 - 0.7)

    Qualcomm Stadium Site

    Specific Plans

    FEMA Flood Areas

    100 Year Floodplain

    100 Year Floodzone

    Planning Area Parcels

    Lakes/Ponds/Bays

    Mission Valley CommunityPlan Boundary

    Community Planning Areas

    !"# $%&'( )

    %*&+

    !"# $%&'( )

    %*&+

    !"#$%&

    '()%*

    &+

    Figure 2-6: Potential Opportunity Sites

    Conceptual Development on Aging Shopping Center Site

    Potential Opportunity Sites

    I created this model and graphic for the Pacifica General Plan Update,addressing similar conditions.Future development anticipated to occur at a lower intensity thanin Mission Valley.

    FAR Diagram

    Map produced collaboratively with Isha Bhattarai and Rajeev Bhatia at D&B.

    URBAN

    INTEN

    SIFIC

    ATION

    San

    Die

    go

  • Palmdale Blvd

    Palmdale Blvd

    Proposed Sierra Hw

    y Alignm

    ent

    Technology Dr/Avenue P8

    E Avenue P12

    Yucca ElementarySchool

    PalmdaleSchoolDistrict

    E Avenue P / Rancho Vista Blvd

    14

    138

    10th St E

    5th St E

    3rd St E3rd St E

    E Avenue Q3

    E Avenue Q7

    Division St

    ExistingPalmdaleTransportationCenter

    ExistingPalmdaleTransportationCenter

    Desert Sands Park

    PalmdaleRegionalMedicalCenter

    ExistingRetailCluster

    LANCASTER LANCASTER

    PALMDALEAIRPORT

    E Avenue Q

    E Avenue Q6

    E Avenue Q3

    CivicCenterCivicCenter

    FUTURE HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR

    LOS ANGELES

    LOS ANGELES

    Sierra Hw

    y

    PALMD

    ALE STATION

    PLATFORM

    S AND

    TRACKS

    PotentialFutureConventionCenter

    StationPlaza

    9th St EProposed Sierra Hw

    y Alignm

    ent

    P

    P

    P

    P

    P

    P

    High Density Residential (HDR)(30 - 60 du/ac)

    Commercial (C) (FAR: Max. 1.0)

    Low Density Residential (LDR)(Max. 6 du/ac)

    Medium Density Residential (MDR)(6 - 16 du/ac)

    Medium-High Density Residential(MHDR) (16 - 30 du/ac)

    Transit Corridor Mixed Use (TCMX)(18 - 40 du/ac; FAR: 0.6 - 2.0*)

    Transit Village Mixed Use (TVMX)(40 - 80 du/ac; FAR: 1.0 - 3.5*)

    Downtown Mixed Use (DMX)(Max.120 du/ac; FAR: 1.5 - 5.0*)

    Business Mix (BM) (FAR: Max. 1.0)

    Industrial (IN) (FAR: Max. 0.5)

    Public Facility (PF) (FAR: Max. 1.0)

    Potential Future Open Spaceand Recreation

    Open Space and Recreation (OSR)

    Existing/Future(Conceptual)Major Street

    Existing/Future(Conceptual)Minor Street

    California High Speed Rail (Conceptual)

    XpressWest High Speed Rail(Conceptual)

    Metrolink Rail

    Union Pacic Railroad

    Potential Future High Capacity Transit

    Palmdale Multimodal StationPlatforms and Tracks (location subject to change)

    Palmdale Multimodal StationOverlay Zone

    TOD Overlay Zone

    High Speed Rail Right of Way(subject to change)

    Landmark

    Potential Parking Garage

    Green Connection

    New or Enhanced Street Crossings

    New or Enhanced Pedestrian/Bike Connection

    Air InstallationsCompatible Use Zones:Accident Potential Zone II

    Study Area

    P

    * Total FAR for all land uses. Additional density/intensity allowed with bonus.

    0 1400

    FEET

    700350

    Figure 3-2:TOD Land Use Plan

    Palmdale Blvd

    Palmdale Blvd

    Proposed Sierra Hw

    y Alignm

    ent

    Technology Dr/Avenue P8

    E Avenue P12

    Yucca ElementarySchool

    PalmdaleSchoolDistrict

    E Avenue P / Rancho Vista Blvd

    14

    138

    10th St E

    5th St E

    3rd St E3rd St E

    E Avenue Q3

    Division St

    ExistingPalmdaleTransportationCenter

    ExistingPalmdaleTransportationCenter

    PalmdaleRegionalMedicalCenter

    ExistingRetailCluster

    PALMDALEAIRPORT

    E Avenue Q

    E Avenue Q6

    E Avenue Q3

    CivicCenterCivicCenter

    FUTURE HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR

    Sierra Hw

    y

    PotentialFutureConventionCenter

    StationPlaza

    LANCASTER LANCASTER

    LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES

    PALMD

    ALE STATION

    PLATFORM

    S AND

    TRACKS

    Desert Sands Park

    Proposed Sierra Hw

    y Alignm

    ent

    P

    P

    P

    P

    P

    P

    35 Feet

    45 Feet

    55 Feet

    85 Feet

    N/A

    Additional 5 Feetwith Ground Floor Commercial Use

    Existing Major Street

    Future Major Street (Conceptual)

    California High Speed Rail(Conceptual)

    XpressWest High Speed Rail(Conceptual)

    Metrolink Rail

    Union Pacic Railroad

    Potential Future High Capacity Transit

    Palmdale Multimodal StationPlatforms and Tracks (location subject to change)

    Palmdale Multimodal StationOverlay Zone

    TOD Overlay Zone

    High Speed Rail Right of Way(subject to change)

    Landmark

    Potential Parking Garage

    Air InstallationsCompatible Use Zones:Accident Potential Zone II

    Study Area

    P

    Additional Height with Bonus

    Maximum Building Heights

    0 1400

    FEET

    700350

    Scale BoxArea=10 acre

    Figure 3-3:Maximum Building Heights

    POTENTIAL MULTIMODALSTAION FACILITIES

    Desert Sands Park

    STATIO

    N P

    LATFO

    RM

    S

    StationPlaza

    DOWNTOWN

    MIXED-USE

    DISTRICT

    High CapacityTransit

    ImprovedStreetscape

    AVENUE QAVENUE Q

    TECHNOLOGY DR / AVENUE P8TECHNOLOGY DR / AVENUE P8

    5th ST E

    5th ST E

    DIVISIO

    N ST

    DIVISIO

    N ST

    3rd ST E

    3rd ST E

    SIER

    RA

    HW

    YSIE

    RR

    A H

    WY

    PR

    OP

    OSE

    D SIE

    RR

    A H

    YWA

    LIGN

    ME

    NT

    PR

    OP

    OSE

    D SIE

    RR

    A H

    YWA

    LIGN

    ME

    NT

    PALMDALE BLVDPALMDALE BLVD

    AVENUE Q3AVENUE Q3

    AVENUE Q6AVENUE Q6

    New/EnhancedStreetConnections

    New/Pedestrian/BikeConnections

    14

    10th ST E

    10th ST E

    10th ST W

    10th ST W

    PRESERVED

    & ENHANCED

    NEIGHBORHOOD

    NEW TRANSIT- ORIENTEDNEIGHBORHOOD

    CivicCenter

    Palmdale RegionalMedical Center

    PotentialFuture

    ConventionCenter

    Future California High Speed Rail

    Future California High Speed Rail

    Metrolink

    Metrolink

    Future High Desert CorridorFuture High Desert Corridor

    To Antelope Valley Mall, Lancaster

    ToPalmdale Airport

    To 47th StreetTo Los

    AngelesTo

    Los Angeles

    GREEN CONNECTION

    TOD

    Overlay Z

    one Study Area

    INDUSTRIAL

    COMMERCIAL

    DISTRICT

    TRANSIT

    VILLAGE

    MIXED-USE

    DISTRICT

    TRANSIT

    VILLAGE

    MIXED-USE

    DISTRICT

    Future X

    press West

    High Speed Rail

    Future X

    press West

    High Speed Rail

    TRANSITCORRIDORMIXED-USE DISTRICT

    BUSINESS MIX

    NEW

    TRANSIT-

    ORIENTED

    NEIGHBORHOOD

    Figure 1-3:Palmdale TOD Study Area Concept Diagram

    Palmdale Blvd

    Palmdale Blvd

    Technology Dr/Avenue P8

    E Avenue P / Rancho Vista Blvd

    14

    138

    10th St E

    5th St E

    3rd St E3rd St E

    E Avenue Q3

    Division St

    ExistingPalmdaleTransportationCenter

    ExistingPalmdaleTransportationCenter

    PalmdaleRegionalMedicalCenter

    ExistingRetailCluster

    PALMDALEAIRPORT

    E Avenue Q

    E Avenue Q6

    E Avenue Q3

    9th St E

    CivicCenterCivicCenter

    FUTURE HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR

    Sierra Hw

    y

    PotentialFutureConventionCenter

    LANCASTER LANCASTER

    LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES

    PALMD

    ALE STATION

    PLATFORM

    S AND

    TRACKS

    Proposed Sierra Hw

    y Alignm

    entProposed Sierra H

    wy A

    lignment

    P

    P

    P

    P

    P

    P

    Transit Corridor Mixed Use

    Transit Village Mixed Use

    Downtown Mixed Use

    Required Active Street Frontage

    Existing/Future (Conceptual)Major Street

    California High Speed Rail(Conceptual)

    XpressWest High Speed Rail(Conceptual)

    Metrolink Rail

    Union Pacic Railroad

    Potential Future High Capacity Transit

    Palmdale Multimodal StationPlatforms and Tracks (location subject to change)

    High Speed Rail Right of Way(subject to change)

    Landmark

    Potential Parking Garage

    Study AreaP

    Entertainment Focus

    TOD Land Use Plan Designation

    Active Street Frontages

    0 1400

    FEET

    700350

    Scale BoxArea=10 acre

    Figure 3-4:Required Active StreetFrontages andEntertainment Areas

    Concept Diagram

    ExistingPalmdaleTransportationCenter

    ExistingPalmdaleTransportationCenter

    FUTURE HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR

    S

    LANCASTER

    Proposed Sierra Hw

    y Alignm

    ent

    Transit Corridor Mixed Use

    Transit Village Mixed Use

    Downtown Mixed Use

    Required Active Street Frontage

    Existing/Future (Conceptual)Major Street

    California High Speed Rail(Conceptual)

    XpressWest High Speed Rail(Conceptual)

    Metrolink Rail

    Entertainment Focus

    TOD Land Use Plan Designation

    Active Street Frontages

    Figure 3-4:Required Active StreetFrontages andEntertainment Areas

    Palmdale TOD Overlay Zone Land Use Framework Plan Public Review Draft November 2015

    Photo 3-10: High density and intensity development around the Station Area creates the opportunity for an engaging public space that serves as a gathering place for the community.

    LU-G-13 Parking Design and Management. Design parking facilities and implement parking policies that support a dense, walkable environment at street level.

    Implementing Policies

    General Plan Revisions LU-I-16 Palmdale Multimodal Station as Downtown Focus.

    Revise General Plan Policy L3.2.1 in the Land Use Element to promote the Palmdale Multimodal Station area as a focus for downtown-scale

    contemporary design and amenities, and functions optimally for users. e station should feature:

    A building form that helps to dene Palmdales future identity;

    Smooth connections between High Speed Rail and Metrolink platforms;

    Access from both the west and east sides of the rail corridor;

    Adjoining public plazas that successfully integrate the future station with surrounding districts and provide memorable, comfortable, and accessible public space;

    A high-quality pedestrian environment around the station, with strong pedestrian connections to the local street network;

    Direct access to local buses as well as future high-capacity transit along Avenue Q;

    Direct access for passenger pick-up and drop-o and taxi and rideshare services; and

    Active commercial uses integrated into the station itself.

    LU-I-18 Palmdale Transportation Center. Support

    1 Introduction

    is Land Use Plan provides a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) framework to guide future development in the area surrounding the Palmdale Transportation Center and the future Palmdale Multimodal Station. e Plan envisions a vibrant urban core and walkable mixed-use neighborhoods that enable healthy, sustainable lifestyles.

    Palmdale, a fast-growing high desert exurb, lies along two planned high-speed rail lines. Dyett & Bhatia led a team to develop transit-oriented development (TOD) policies to guide the transformation of the future station area and the corridor to the west.

    Our TOD Land Use Framework Plan includes a concept diagram and three regulatory maps, shown here. Together with detailed policies, these maps are intended to result in the integration of transportation infrastucture with a high-quality public realm, and the development over time of a vibrant urban district.

    Maximum Building Heights

    Land Use Plan

    Required Active Uses and Entertainment Areas

    Diagrams produced collaboratively with Angela Wang and Liz Schmidt at D&B.

    Photos show examples of vital urban spaces and desirable urban building form.

    December 2015Palmdale, CaliforniaPalmdale TOD Framework Plan

    Palm

    dale

    STA

    TIO

    N A

    REA

    PLA

    NN

    ING

  • Development Area

    A:Southeast

    Only

    B:NorthwestEmphasis

    C:Most

    Compact

    D:ModerateCompact

    Infill 5,000 3,500 5,000 4,000Southeast Expansion Areas 10,100 3,200 5,900 4,900Northwest Expansion Areas 8,500 4,200 6,400Total Potential New Units 15,100 15,200 15,100 15,300Average Gross Density(units/acre) 8.0 9.1 9.0 7.4

    Alternative

    Alternative Land Use ScenariosProduced collaboratively with Sophie Martin, Leslie Gould and Mark ChambersAlternative A: Southeast Only Alternative B: Northwest Emphasis Alternative D: Moderate Compact

    Streets and Open SpaceRivermark, Santa Clara

    Land UseRivermark, Santa Clara

    Scale ComparisonRivermark / SE Expansion Area

    Development Potential by Alternative and by Area

    For Turlock, a fast-growing city in Californias Central Valley, we developed growth scenarios that varied in the location and intensity of new development outside current city limits. All the options shared core ideas: the creation of compact new neighborhoods and a unifying system of parks and pathways.

    We evaluated the alternatives for their implications for infrastructure investments, farmland and other issues. With community feedback, we built the new General Plan around the preferred land use alternative. The Plan was adopted in 2012, and received an award from the American Planning Association.

    We studied good precedents for compact neighborhood develop-ment. Rivermark, in Santa Clara, features sensitively-designed pocket parks (left) and a mix of housing types (right).

    Tu

    rlock

    GRO

    WTH

    ALTER

    NTIA

    VES

    Turlock General Plan UpdateDecember 2009Turlock, California

  • 6-17PACIFICA GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

    De

    vil

    sS l

    ide

    Tra

    i l

    Milagra RidgeTrail

    Pier to Ridge Trail

    Sharp ParkTrail

    Mori Ridge Trail

    Baquiano Trail

    Cattle Hill Trail

    Sweeney

    R idge Trail (Bay Area Ridge Trail)

    San Pedro ValleyTrail

    PedroPointTrail

    Coas

    tal T

    rail

    Coas

    tal

    Trai

    l

    Montar

    a Mou

    ntain T

    rail

    Weller Ranch Trail

    Hazelnut Trail

    Old SanPedro Mountian Rd

    P a c i f i c

    O c e a n

    400

    300200

    100

    100

    500

    600

    700

    400

    500

    300

    100200

    300 400500

    600

    700

    600

    400300

    200

    100 500

    600700

    200

    300

    400500

    600700

    800

    900 1000

    1100

    1200

    100

    100

    200

    200

    300

    100

    300

    100

    11001000

    900

    800

    700600

    400 500600

    700

    800900

    1000 11001200

    300

    800

    200

    900800

    700600

    500

    700600

    500

    400300300400

    500

    400

    500

    400

    400

    300200

    100

    400

    300

    200

    100

    500

    600 700

    200

    100

    800900

    10001100

    1100

    1000900

    800700600

    500

    1100

    1000

    700

    600

    800700

    600500

    400300

    400300 500600700

    800

    300200300

    400

    500

    600

    200

    400

    300200100

    400

    400500

    600

    700

    800

    9001000

    1100

    300

    200300

    200

    300

    400500600

    700

    800

    900

    100

    200300

    400

    300

    400

    400

    300

    200

    100

    500

    100

    200300

    400

    500

    100200300

    400

    500

    900

    1220D

    ev

    i l s

    Sl i

    de

    T

    un

    ne

    l

    Figure 6-3:Trail System

    0 1/2 11/4

    MILES

    2

    Existing Trails

    Existing On-StreetTrail Routes

    Proposed Trails orTrail Improvements

    Proposed On-StreetTrail Routes

    Existing Trail Heads

    Trail Heads to beImproved

    Existing SR 1 Crossing

    Proposed SR 1 Crossing

    Regional Open Space

    Neighborhood, Districtand Pocket Parks

    Golf Course

    Beach

    Other Protected Open Space

    Partial Conservationwith Development

    School Playfields

    City Limits

    Planning Area

    Source: City of Pacifica, 2008; San MateoCounty, 2009; Dyett & Bhatia, 2013.

    100 ft Contour

    GAT EWAY DR

    FIRECREST AVE

    INVERNESS DR

    MONTEREY

    RD

    PALM

    ETT OO

    AVE

    MANORDR

    SKYLINE BLVD

    GLEN

    COURT

    MONTEREY RD

    PALM

    ETTO

    AV

    E

    EDGEMAR DR

    MIL

    LER

    AVE

    AVALON DR

    OCEA

    NA

    BLVD PALOMA AVE

    TALBOT AVE

    BRADFORD WAY

    SHAR

    P

    PARK RD

    MOANA WAY

    LUNDYW

    AY

    FAIRWAY DR RIDGEWAY DR

    BEA

    CH

    BLVD

    REINA DEL MAR AVEROCKA

    WAYBEACHAVE

    TERRANOVABLVD

    EVERGLADES DR

    ODDS

    TAD

    BLVD

    CRES

    PIDR

    LERIDAWAY

    CR ESPIDR

    SEV

    ILLE

    DR

    MANZA

    NITA

    DRALICA NTE DRLIND A MAR BLVD

    ROSITA RD

    ADOB

    E R

    D

    PERA

    LTA

    RD

    DESO

    LO

    LINDA MAR BLVD

    FASSLERAVE

    PARK

    LINCOLN

    GRAN

    D A

    VE

    WES

    TBO

    ROUG

    H

    KING

    DR

    SKYLINE BLVD

    MILAGRA DR

    HIC

    KEY

    BLVD

    ESPL

    AN

    AD

    EAV

    E

    MANORDR

    ROBERTS

    RD

    SHAR

    PPA

    RK

    RD

    SEASIDE DR

    CLARENDON RD

    SAN JOSE AVEPacifica

    Pier

    M i l a g r aR i d g e

    ( G G N R A )

    S h a r p P a r kG o l f C o u r s e

    M o r i P o i n t( G G N R A )

    S h a r pP a r k

    S w e e n e yR i d g e

    ( G G N R A )

    San Pedro Val leyCounty Park

    Pedro PointHeadlands(GGNRA)

    SharpPark

    Beach

    RockawayBeach

    PacificaState Beach

    NorthernCoastalBluffs

    (GGNRA)

    P e n i n s u l aW a t e r s h e d

    ( S F P U C )

    FasslerRidge

    CattleHill

    McNee RanchState Park

    SanchezAdobe

    Harry Dea n Trail

    Figure 6-2: Trail System

    6-16 PACIFICA GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

    6.2 TRAIL SYSTEM

    Existing Trails in the Planning Area

    e Planning Area has miles of trails through GGNRA land in San Pedro Valley County Park, and along the coast, including segments along City streets. Historically, the City has sought to create a system that includes a coastal trail, a ridgeline trail, and lateral trails connecting the ridgeline to the coast, as shown in Figure -.

    Coastal TrailPacificas Coastal Trail currently runs almost the length of the Planning Area, from the Daly City boundary to Pedro Point Shopping Center. e route follows Palmetto Avenue alongside the North-ern Coastal Bluffs, turns onto Esplanade Avenue through the West Edgemar-Pacific Manor neigh-borhood, and follows Palmetto again through West Sharp Park. e trail then branches into two paral-lel routes. e western route travels along the levee between Sharp Park Golf Course and Sharp Park Beach, and then east along the north side of Mori

    Point. e eastern route follows Francisco Boulevard south, meeting the other trail at the Mori Point trail-head. From this point, the Coastal Trail follows a path alongside Highway and then arcs west along the restored section of Calera Creek in the Rocka-way Quarry site. After a short on-street segment in the Rockaway Beach district, the trail follows a path over the Rockaway Headlands and then along the inland side of the dunes at Pacifica State Beach. e trail currently comes to an end at the south end of the beach.

    Ridge Trailse Sweeney Ridge trail, a segment of the Bay Area Ridge Trail, extends from the Portola Gate at the boundary of the Peninsula Watershed in the south to Milagra Ridge in the north. Lateral trail connec-tions exist along Mori Ridge and Cattle Hill to the west, and the Sneath Lane right-of-way to the east. Trailheads with parking lots are at Milagra Ridge and Skyline College to the north and northeast, Shelldance Nursery off of Highway to the west,

    The Coastal Trail runs nearly the length of the City, including this segment along the dunes at Pacifica State Beach.

    6

    OP

    EN

    SPA

    CE

    AN

    D C

    OM

    MU

    NIT

    Y FA

    CILIT

    IES

    6-25PACIFICA GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

    POLICIES

    Policies included in both the General Plan and Local Coastal Land Use Plan are indicated with a .

    Guiding Policies

    OC-G- Coastal Access and Recreational Opportunities. Provide maximum coastal access and recreational oppor-tunities for all people consistent with public safety and the need to protect public rights, rights of property owners, and natural resource areas from overuse, including access at each point identified on Figure -.

    OC-G- Management of Public Access. Pro-vide public access in a manner that takes into account the need to regulate the time, place, and manner that access is provided, based on such factors as topo-graphic and site constraints; the fragility of natural resources; and the privacy of adjacent residential uses.

    OC-G- Distribution of Public Coastal Facilities. Continue to distribute public facilities, including parking areas or facil-ities, so as to mitigate against the impacts of overcrowding or overuse by the public of any single area.

    Implementing Policies

    OC-I- Public Shoreline Access. Continue to ensure that new development does not interfere with the publics right of access to the sea at locations identified in the Local Coastal Land Use Plan and where public access to the sea has been acquired through historic use or legislative au-thorization.

    Public access locations are shown on the Open Space and Trails map and in the Public Access and Recreation chapter of the Local Coastal Land Use Plan.

    Promote potential trail improvements by GGNRA to create controlled public access to the bluffs while protecting Northern Coastal scrub and other vegetation (top). The City is planning improvements to the public access point south of the San Fran-cisco RV Park (middle). Ensure permanent public access to Rocka-way Beach, and pursue opportunities to enhance it (bottom).

    6-20 PACIFICA GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

    to enhance recreational use of Sharp Park and provide public access in a wooded area unique in Pacifica.

    OC-I- Harry Dean Trail. Improve and extend existing trails connecting City-owned parks and open spaces in Pacificas northern neighborhoods to reach Skyline Boulevard on the east and Westline Drive along the Northern Coastal Bluffs.

    OC-I- Pier to Ridge Trail. Develop a direct pedestrian route between the Sharp Park Beach Promenade and upper Sharp Park Road, also connecting the West and East Sharp Park neighborhoods. Improve-ments should include:

    A new trail extending east from the top of Talbot Road to Sharp Park Road, with a public access easement;

    Pedestrian improvements and trail sig-nage along Talbot Road and San Jose or Santa Rosa Avenue; and

    Replacement or rehabilitation of the Highway over-crossing to enhance pedestrian access between the West and East Sharp Park neighborhoods.

    OC-I- San Pedro Valley Trail. Develop a pedestrian route between Pacifica State Beach and San Pedro Valley County Park through the Linda Mar and West Linda Mar neighborhoods, including enhance-ment of the San Pedro Terrace right-of-way; sidewalk improvements and signage along Rosita Road; and connections to the Sanchez Adobe and Old San Pedro Mountain Road.

    OC-I- Enhanced Visitor Services at Shell-dance Nursery. Support the proposal for enhanced visitor services at the Shell-dance Nursery site, including an educa-tion/visitors center, additional parking, and better access, to be implemented by GGNRA.

    Develop a direct pedestrian route between the Sharp Park Beach Promenade and upper Sharp Park Road (top). Connect the Por-tola Expedition Camp with the San Francisco Bay Discovery Site on Sweeney Ridge, giving visitors the experience of this historic route (middle). Support the development of a new Highway 1 over-crossing at Mori Point, enhancing the Shelldance Nursery location as a central point from which to explore Pacificas trail system (bottom).

    6-6 PACIFICA GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

    Distribution (Acres per 1,000 Residents)Pacifica requires developers to dedicate land or pay an in-lieu fee to provide park land at a ratio of five acres per , residents. e citywide ratio (. acres per ,) includes school grounds. Distribu-tion standards by park type are provided in ranges to give the City flexibility to respond to opportunities and adapt to potentially changing circumstances.

    Recreation Facilities and Needs

    Athletic Fields and CourtsCity parks include five baseball fields and two soccer fields. School sites provide another tennis courts, baseball or softball fields, eight soccer fields, four foot-ball fields, three gyms, two full tracks, and two swim-ming pools. e Jean E. Brink Pool, located at Oceana High School, is home to the City of Pacificas aquatics program. e pool at Terra Nova High School is not open to the public. Pacificas two high schools have renovated athletic facilities at both campuses.

    Pacifica youth participate at high levels in league sports, including two soccer and three baseball leagues. Currently, local sports leagues may use the Citys fields for free but may take responsibility for maintenance. e leagues pay a fee to the school dis-tricts for use of those fields, often using grant money from parent organizations. ere is a shortage of fields for both organized play and general commu-nity use.

    Playgrounds

    Pacifica currently has playgrounds within its dis-trict, neighborhood and pocket parks. West Edge-mar-Pacific Manor, much of West Sharp Park, West Fairway Park, Rockaway Beach, and Pedro Point, as well as much of Linda Mar and Park Pacifica, are not within walking distance of a playground.

    Other Amenities

    Many parks have fields where dogs can play or be walked on-leash, and an off-leash dog park has been developed at Sanchez Park. Dogs also are allowed off-leash at Esplanade Beach. A bocce ball court has been built at the community center, with donated funds and services.

    Parks and Recreation Priorities

    According to the California Parks and Recreation Society, the most valued feature of parks is the pres-ervation of and access to outdoor spaces, particularly minimally-developed areas in a nearly natural state and areas with facilities for childrens play and for exercise and group sports. Parks also provide a sense of social connectedness. e desire for natural areas is abundantly met in Pacifica.

    Pacifica has a good inventory of park land. Because population growth is expected to be slow during the planning period, little new land is needed. Fiscal constraints, meanwhile, make park maintenance a

    Oddstad Park occupies a mostly wooded 20 acres on a ridge in Linda Mar (left). Pacifica Skate Park could become part of an enhanced community gathering place with diverse attractions (right).

    Parks, Open Space and Trails

    Coastal Access

    Pacifica, lying along the coast south of San Francisco, has a community torn between the need for more tax revenue and the strong desire to preserve open space. D&Bs plan emphasized the opportunity to make the most of the natural setting for both local quality of life and economic development. We gave detailed attention to creating a cohesive and legible trail system connecting the ridges with the coast, and to create clusters of activity with a rich sense of place.

    While Pacifica has a wealth of open space, active parks are in short supply. The Plan features detailed policies for enhancing existing parks and commu-nity amenities.

    Finally, the Plan includes a managed retreat strategy for public land, includ-ing the cherished Sharp Park, to adapt to sea level rise while preserving both recreation and habitat.

    Maps produced collaboratively with Isha Bhattarai and Mark Chambers.

    Support bluff trail development on GGNRA land

    Pursue small bluff-top park if feasible

    Improve public access and restore bluff conditions

    Maintain public parking as part of redevelopment of City-owned property

    Ensure public accessProvide public trail to overlook point as part of development or land conservationProvide additional signage and amenities at Crespi Drive parking lot

    Improve new segment of Coastal Trail along former railroad berm

    Trail and access improvements expected under GGNRA management

    March 2014Pacica General Plan and Local Coastal Plan

    PARKS A

    ND

    TRAIL

    SP

    acif

    ica

    Pacica, California

  • 0 160 320 480 64080Meters

    [0 160 320 480 64080

    Meters[Block Transformation Diagrams

    Produced collaboratively with Doron Serban

    Circulation Network With New Midblock Connections Street Rights-of-Way as Civic Land ReserveThe Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council (UPC) hired a consulting team including Dyett & Bhatia to develop implementation tools for its ambitious Abu Dhabi Plan 2030. Our teams focus was on the citys core.

    The Public Realm Implementation Strategy defines a connected network of streets and features policies to prioritize the pedestrian, provide a tapestry of public spaces, and manage parking.

    My role included concept develop-ment, graphics, plan writing, and coordination with the larger project team.

    Abu Dhabi, UAE

    PUBLIC

    REA

    LMA

    bu

    Dh

    ab

    iAbu Dhabi CBD Public Realm Implementation StrategyApril 2009

  • PORTLAND

    BEAVERTON

    REYNOLDS

    CENTENNIAL

    NORTHCLACKAMAS

    SCAPPOOSE

    PARKROSE

    DAVIDDOUGLAS

    TIGARD-TUALATIN

    RIVERDALE

    VANCOUVER

    EVERGREEN

    O L D T O W N /C H I N AT O W N

    P O R T S M O U T H

    A R N O L DC R E E K

    V E R N O N

    K I N G

    S T. J O H N S

    D O W N -T O W N

    L L O Y DD I S T R I C T

    S U N D E R L A N D

    G O O S EH O L L O W

    N O R T H W E S T

    P O W E L L H U R S T -G I L B E R T

    N O R T H W E S TH E I G H T S

    C E N T E N N I A L

    B O I S E

    W O O D L A W N

    H U M B O L D T

    P E A R L

    H O L LY W O O D

    C O R B E T T /T E R W I L L I G E R /

    L A I R H I L L

    H O M E S T E A D

    B R I D G E T O N

    H AY D E NI S L A N D

    Alliance

    Astor

    Lane

    Scott

    Clark

    Peninsula

    Rieke

    Vestal

    SittonGeorge

    Winterhaven

    Hayhurst

    Binnsmead

    Maplewood

    Rosa Parks

    Forest Park

    Ockley Green

    RonRussell

    DavidDouglas

    Clarendon-Portsmouth

    Roosevelt

    Chief Joseph

    Beach

    Jefferson

    Humboldt King

    Woodlawn

    Faubion

    Vernon

    Sabin

    Alameda

    Irvington

    Boise-Eliot

    YWA at Tubman

    Hollyrood

    GrantFernwood

    Beaumont

    Rigler

    RosewayHts Madison

    Lee

    PrescottParkrose

    Parkrose

    SacramentoRussell

    Shaver

    MargaretScott

    GlenfairMenloPark

    VenturaPark

    FloydLight

    CherryPark

    MillPark

    Bridger

    LincolnPark

    WestPowellhurst

    EarlBoyles

    GilbertHts

    HaroldOliver

    Alder

    LynchView

    LynchWood

    FourCorners

    AliceOtt

    GilbertPark

    Lent

    Kelly

    Woodmere

    Whitman

    MarysvilleArleta

    Woodstock

    LewisDuniway

    Llewellyn

    Sellwood

    Grout

    Creston

    Franklin

    AtkinsonRichmond

    Cleveland

    Hosford

    Abernethy

    Glencoe Mt. TaborSunnyside

    Laurelhurst

    Buckman

    BensonDa Vinci

    Wilson

    Gray

    Jackson

    CapitolHill

    Stephenson

    Markham

    Bridlemile

    SylvanAinsworth

    Chapman

    MLC

    Lincoln

    JamesJohn

    Riverdale

    Fir RidgeCampus

    Helensview

    Marshall

    Children in NeighborhoodsCity of Portland

    2000

    SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Elementary school

    LEGEND

    N

    K-8 or other

    Middle school

    High school

    N E I G H B O R H O O D

    District alternativeprogram

    2.3 to 11.4%

    11.5 to 17.8%

    17.9 to 21.9%

    22.0 to 25.9%

    26.0 to 33.2%

    Children 0-17 as % of neighborhood population, 2000

    Schools, Families, HousingAn Initiative of the Portland City Council

    June 2008

    PORTLANDBEAVERTON

    REYNOLDS

    CENTENNIAL

    NORTHCLACKAMAS

    PARKROSE

    DAVIDDOUGLAS

    TIGARD-TUALATIN

    RIVERDALE

    LAKE OSWEGO

    SCAPPOOSEVANCOUVER

    EVERGREEN

    Alliance

    Astor

    Lane

    Scott

    Clark

    Peninsula

    Rieke

    Vestal

    SittonGeorge

    Winterhaven

    Hayhurst

    Binnsmead

    Maplewood

    Rosa Parks

    Forest Park

    Ockley Green

    RonRussell

    DavidDouglas

    Clarendon-Portsmouth

    Roosevelt

    Chief Joseph

    Beach

    Jefferson

    Humboldt King

    Woodlawn

    Faubion

    Vernon

    Sabin

    Alameda

    Irvington

    Boise-Eliot

    YWA at Tubman

    HollyroodGrant

    Fernwood

    Beaumont

    Rigler

    RosewayHts

    Madison

    Lee

    Prescott

    ParkroseParkrose

    SacramentoRussell

    Shaver

    MargaretScott

    GlenfairMenlo

    ParkVenturaPark

    FloydLight

    CherryPark

    MillPark

    Bridger

    LincolnPark

    WestPowellhurst

    EarlBoyles Gilbert

    Hts

    HaroldOliver

    Alder

    LynchView

    LynchWood

    FourCorners

    AliceOtt Gilbert

    Park

    Lent

    Kelly

    Woodmere

    Whitman

    MarysvilleArleta

    Woodstock

    LewisDuniway

    Llewellyn

    Sellwood

    Grout

    Creston

    Franklin

    AtkinsonRichmond

    Cleveland

    HosfordAbernethy

    Glencoe Mt. TaborSunnyside

    Laurelhurst

    Buckman

    Benson Da Vinci

    Wilson

    Gray

    Jackson

    CapitolHill

    Stephenson

    Markham

    Bridlemile

    Sylvan

    Ainsworth

    Chapman

    MLC

    Lincoln

    JamesJohn

    Riverdale

    Fir RidgeCampus

    Helensview

    Marshall

    Housing AffordabilityCity of Portland

    2004

    SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Elementary school

    LEGEND

    N

    K-8 or other

    Middle school

    High school

    N E I G H B O R H O O D

    District alternativeprogram

    Households at80% AMI can afford to own

    Housing affordabilityby neighborhood(median home price, 2004)

    Households at100% AMI can afford to ownHouseholds at100% AMI cannotafford to own

    Schools, Families, HousingAn Initiative of the Portland City Council

    June 2008

    PPS

    BEAVERTON

    REYNOLDS

    CENTENNIAL

    NORTHCLACKAMAS

    SCAPPOOSE

    PARKROSE

    DAVIDDOUGLAS

    TIGARD-TUALATIN

    RIVERDALE

    VANCOJVER

    EVERGREEN

    O L D T O W N /C H I N AT O W N H A Z E LW O O D

    W I L K E S

    G L E N F A I R

    C E N T E N N I A L

    L E N T S

    R O S E W AY

    C O N C O R D I A

    P O R T S M O U T H

    B R E N T W O O D -D A R L I N G T O N

    H U M B O L D T

    W O O D L A W N

    Alliance

    Astor

    Lane

    Scott

    Clark

    Peninsula

    Rieke

    Vestal

    Sitton George

    Winterhaven

    Hayhurst

    Binnsmead

    Maplewood

    Rosa Parks

    Forest Park

    Ockley Green

    RonRussell

    DavidDouglas

    Clarendon-Portsmouth

    Roosevelt

    Chief Joseph

    Beach JeffersonHumboldt King

    Woodlawn

    Faubion

    Vernon

    Sabin

    AlamedaIrvington

    Boise-Eliot

    YWA at Tubman

    Hollyrood

    GrantFernwood

    BeaumontRigler

    RosewayHts

    Madison

    Lee

    Prescott

    ParkroseParkrose

    SacramentoRussell

    Shaver

    MargaretScott

    GlenfairMenlo

    ParkVenturaPark

    FloydLight

    CherryPark

    MillPark

    Bridger

    LincolnPark

    WestPowellhurst

    EarlBoyles Gilbert

    Hts

    HaroldOliver

    Alder

    LynchView

    LynchWood

    FourCorners

    AliceOtt Gilbert

    Park

    Lent

    Kelly

    Woodmere

    Whitman

    MarysvilleArleta

    Woodstock

    LewisDuniway

    Llewellyn

    Sellwood

    Grout

    Creston

    FranklinAtkinson

    Richmond

    Cleveland

    HosfordAbernethy

    Glencoe Mt. TaborSunnyside

    Laurelhurst

    Buckman

    BensonDa Vinci

    Wilson

    Gray

    Jackson

    CapitolHill

    Stephenson

    Markham

    Bridlemile

    Sylvan

    Ainsworth

    Chapman

    MLC

    Lincoln

    JamesJohn

    Riverdale

    Fir RidgeCampus

    Helensview

    Marshall

    Poverty ShiftCity of Portland

    1990-2000

    SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Elementary school

    LEGEND

    N

    K-8 or other

    Middle school

    High schoolDistrict alternativeprogram

    -518 to -273

    Change in poorpopulation, 1990-2000(census tracts)

    -272 to -53

    -52 to 116

    117 to 367

    368 to 875

    Schools, Families, HousingAn Initiative of the Portland City Council

    June 2008

    Portlands largest school district had experienced ten years of declining enroll-ment, while districts on the outer east side struggled to keep pace with growth. Families with children had moved out from close-in neighborhoods, and housing affordability and choice were important factors.

    Schools, Families, Housing, an initiative spearheaded by Commissioner Erik Sten, aimed to make all Portland neighborhoods work well for families with children. I helped to convene stakeholders around partnership opportunities, and produced a series of maps to discover and express the relationships between school enrollment and housing affordability, school facilities and neighborhood infrastructure.

    Rosa Parks Elementary School (top) was built as part of the creation of a mixed-income neighborhood on a large public housing site.

    Schools, Families, HousingJune 2008 Portland, Oregon

    Po

    rtla

    nd

    SCH

    OO

    LS

  • PORTLAND

    BEAVERTON

    REYNOLDS

    CENTENNIAL

    NORTHCLACKAMAS

    SCAPPOOSE

    PARKROSE

    DAVIDDOUGLAS

    TIGARD-TUALATIN

    RIVERDALE

    VANCOUVER

    EVERGREEN

    Meek/Alliance

    Astor

    Lane

    Scott

    Clark

    Peninsula

    Rieke

    Vestal

    SittonGeorge

    Brooklyn/Winterhaven

    Hayhurst

    Binnsmead

    Maplewood

    RosaParks

    ForestPark

    Ockley Green

    RonRussell

    DAVIDDOUGLAS

    Clarendon

    ROOSEVELT

    Chief Joseph

    BeachJEFFERSON

    HumboldtKing

    WoodlawnFaubion

    Vernon

    Sabin

    Alameda

    Irvington

    Boise-Eliot

    TubmanHollyrood

    GRANTFernwood

    Beaumont

    Rigler

    RosewayHts MADISON

    Lee

    PrescottPARKROSE

    Parkrose

    SacramentoRussell

    Shaver

    MargaretScott

    GlenfairMenloParkVenturaParkFloyd

    Light

    CherryPark

    MillPark

    BridgerLincolnPark

    WestPowellhurstEarl

    Boyles

    GilbertHts

    HaroldOliver

    Alder

    LynchView

    LynchWood

    FourCorners

    AliceOtt

    GilbertPark

    Lent

    KellyWoodmere

    Whitman

    MarysvilleArleta

    Woodstock

    Lewis

    Duniway

    Llewellyn

    Sellwood

    Grout

    Creston

    FRANKLIN

    AtkinsonRichmond

    CLEVELAND

    HosfordEnvironmental/Abernethy

    Glencoe

    Mt. Tabor

    Sunnyside

    Laurelhurst

    Buckman

    BENSONDa Vinci

    WILSON

    Gray

    Jackson

    CapitolHill

    Stephenson

    Markham

    Bridlemile

    Ainsworth

    Chapman

    MLC

    LINCOLN

    JamesJohn

    RIVERDALE

    FIRRIDGE

    MARSHALL

    PortsmouthBall

    Kenton Applegate

    Rose CityPark

    Kellogg

    Smith

    Edwards

    Wilcox

    Youngson

    Enrollment Change bySchool and School District

    City of Portland2001-02 to 2006-07

    LEGEND

    N

    -25.1% to -100%

    Schools, Families, HousingAn Initiative of the Portland City Council

    June 2008

    Public Schools by Enrollment Change, 2001-02 to 2006-07

    -49.9% to -25.0%

    -24.9% to 0

    0 to 25.0%

    25.1% +

    School Districts by Enrollment Change, 2001-02 to 2006-07

    10.1% to 25.7%

    0 to 10.0%

    -4.9% to 0

    -13.6% to -5.0%

    Closed school

    New school

    Former program/current program

    PORTLAND

    BEAVERTON

    REYNOLDS

    CENTENNIAL

    NORTHCLACKAMAS

    SCAPPOOSE

    PARKROSE

    DAVIDDOUGLAS

    TIGARD-TUALATIN

    RIVERDALE

    VANCOUVER

    EVERGREEN

    Alliance

    Astor

    Lane

    Scott

    Clark

    Peninsula

    Rieke

    Vestal

    SittonGeorge

    Winterhaven

    Hayhurst

    Binnsmead

    Maplewood

    Rosa Parks

    Forest Park

    Ockley Green

    RonRussell

    DavidDouglas

    Clarendon-Portsmouth

    Roosevelt

    Chief Joseph

    Beach

    Jefferson

    Humboldt King

    Woodlawn

    Faubion

    Vernon

    Sabin

    Alameda

    Irvington

    Boise-Eliot

    YWA at Tubman

    Hollyrood

    GrantFernwood

    Beaumont

    Rigler

    RosewayHts

    Madison

    Lee

    Prescott

    ParkroseParkrose

    SacramentoRussell

    Shaver

    MargaretScott

    GlenfairMenloPark

    VenturaPark

    FloydLight

    CherryPark

    MillPark

    Bridger

    LincolnPark

    WestPowellhurst

    EarlBoyles

    GilbertHts

    HaroldOliver

    Alder

    LynchView

    LynchWood

    FourCorners

    AliceOtt

    GilbertPark

    Lent

    Kelly

    Woodmere

    Whitman

    MarysvilleArleta

    Woodstock

    Lewis

    Duniway

    Llewellyn

    Sellwood

    GroutCreston

    Franklin

    AtkinsonRichmond

    Cleveland

    Hosford

    Abernethy

    Glencoe Mt. TaborSunnyside

    Laurelhurst

    Buckman

    BensonDa Vinci

    Wilson

    Gray

    Jackson

    CapitolHill

    Stephenson

    Markham

    Bridlemile

    SylvanAinsworth

    Chapman

    MLC

    Lincoln

    JamesJohn

    Riverdale

    Fir RidgeCampus

    Helensview

    Marshall

    Sidewalks Around Schoolsand Safer Routes to Schools

    City of Portland2002, 2008

    SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Elementary school

    LEGEND

    N

    K-8 or other

    Middle school

    High schoolDistrict alternativeprogram

    1 to 10%

    96 to 100%

    Schools, Families, HousingAn Initiative of the Portland City Council

    June 2008

    Sidewalks aroundschools

  • MichiganCentralStation

    NewConventionCenter

    OldTigerStadium

    CoboCenterFootprint

    Michigan Ave.

    I-75

    I-75

    AmbassadorBridge

    DOWNTOWNDETROIT

    Ann ArborChicago

    DearbornDTW

    Ohio

    Ontar io

    NWSuburbs

    NESuburbs

    New CenterSouthf ie ld

    WindsorToronto

    N

    River

    Rouge

    Lodge

    Conner Cr.

    River f

    ront BelleIsle

    RegionalGreen

    Network

    DTW

    RoyalOakSouth-

    field Warren

    WINDSOR

    DETROIT

    Chicago

    Toronto

    RegionalTransit

    MICHIGAN

    WO

    ODW

    ARD

    JEFFERSON

    LODGE

    DowntownTransit

    LibraryTransitCtr

    BROA

    DWAY

    WASH

    INGT

    ON

    WOO

    DWAR

    D

    County

    City

    MuseumWelcomeCenter

    Symmetriesand

    Asymmetries

    1 mile1/2

    1/4

    N

    Site Plan: South of Michigan3-D Model: Downtown

    Produced Collaboratively

    Symmetries andAsymmetries

    Cobo Move as Catalyst Project

    Regional Transit

    DiagramsRegional Green

    RenderingProposed 3rd Street

    Retail Center

    Downtown Transit

    The vision includes high-quality transit (middle), restoration of Michigan Central Station (bottom), and a great riverfront (facing page).

    Fort

    Jefferson

    Michigan

    Woodw

    ard

    Broadw

    ay

    Washington

    3rd StreetRetail

    West RiverfrontDistrict

    PublicRiverfront

    My proposal for downtown Detroit aims to create transit accessibility, high-quality public space, legibile urban structure, a great riverfront, and a vivid international connection. I drew upon plans pairing infrastructure and cultural regeneration (Bilbao), great waterfront parks (Chicago) and the transformation of freeway corridors (Seoul).

    The plan hinges on relocating the Cobo convention center to a site adjacent to the abandoned rail station. This action would be coordinated with transit and open space systems at the regional scale. The current Cobo site would be integrated into a coherent public riverfront and a new downtown residential district.

    This was my final studio project at the University of Michigan.

    Cobo ConuenceApril 2007Detroit

    WAT

    ERFR

    ON

    TD

    etr

    oit

  • 100 200 500 1000 ftN

    Key Program Elements

    Illustration: Public Riverfront

    RenderingsHart Plaza and new canopy (top)Washington Blvd. from Jefferson (bottom)

    infrastructure public facilitiesand spaces

    privatedevelopment

    Existing

    Proposed

    Existing

    Proposed

    Existing

    Proposed

    Washington

    DetroitMuseum

    PublicRecreation

    Jefferson Blvd.

    Expo Ctr

    River levelplaza

    Street levelplaza Amphi-theater Canopy

    PublicDock

    IntlWelcomeCtr

    Hotel

    RenaissanceCenter

    West Riverfrontdistrict

    Gardensand Lawns

    Wooodw

    ard

    WATER

    FRO

    NT

    Detro

    it

  • Section: Regional Node Section: Neighborhood Node

    3-D Model

    Garfield Boulevard Site Plan

    Design Guidelines

    SketchesRegional Node

    Neighborhood Node

    Bulk Controls

    Produced collaboratively

    Streetwall and plazas define the edge of Garfield Blvd.

    Sidewalk-facing active uses support State St. commercial character

    160 maximum height along

    State St.

    Setback above 25 to provide buffer from traffic noise for upper-level usesMy plan for Garfield Boulevard intends to transform

    a depressed urban arterial into a stimulating, diverse environment with strong and clearly articu-lated transportation and design links to the larger city. The proposal would reconfigure the boulevard to create distinctive public spaces and enhance an experience of rhythm. The boulevard would be heterogeneous in form and use. A variety of new housing choices for neighborhood residents and newcomers would be introduced. Preliminary design guidelines cover the functional characteris-tics of program and circulation and the formal categories of bulk and architectural expression. This project was completed for an urban design studio at the University of Michigan.

    1000 ft500200100

    bb

    b b

    a a

    aa

    Gareld Boulevard: Vital ChicagoDecember 2006Chicago

    CO

    RRID

    OR R

    EVIT

    ALI

    ZAT

    ION

    Ch

    icag

    o

  • Narrative strip (photocollages)

    TRANSPORTATION HUB LIONS GATE NEW PARKS NEW VIEWS BAGGAGE PORTAGE

    CITY OF TRAVELERSOPEN SHUTTERS RESIDENCES FOR RESIDENTSMORE SPACE FOR THE WATERARRIVAL BY WATER

    For a studio project, we were asked to develop a concept that would support a spectacular event and a long- term reinvigoration of Venice. My proposal seeks to exploit opportunities for big change, and also to respond sensitively to the particular beauty and dynamics of Venice.

    Small moves, dispersed throughout the city or acting through its citizens, act as a cushion beneath larger strategic moves which reorganize transportation infrastructure and create new districts and parks. The changes concern the relationship between tourism and residency, and aim to make the Venice experience better in both categories.

    CITYW

    IDE V

    ISIO

    NV

    en

    ice

    Venice for TomorrowNovember 2006Venice, Italy

  • Hotel Pema (this page)Traveling in rural India, I was intrigued by the common occurrence of buildings which served as both home and business. I chose one of these build-ings as my subject for a composite drawing bringing together a site plan, floor plan, front and rear elevations, and 3-D view. These are rendered in pen, colored pencil and marker.

    Maharaj (facing page)I was delighted by this street corner scene in Kolkata and its social environ-ment. I was also interested in the biodegradable clay cups and banana-leaf dishes. Ive tried to capture these aspects in my drawing.

    September 2016Hotel Pema: Restaurant, Snack Shop, and Home

    December 2016Tashiding, India

    DRAW

    ING

    STash

    idin

    g

  • Maharaj tea and snack shopDecember 2016Kolkata, India

    DRAW

    ING

    SK

    olk

    ata

  • AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY

    2000 2001 2002

    ena-BJP did not protect GKSS and RMSS call for

    d sale proceeds. MOA rules, to put it in a level agree that regulation of ability of textile industry MILL LAND POLICY.

    lls managements rehabilitation uld be reopened, 1500 workers eme is resisted by GKSS, which already promised and failed to ILLS.

    pany, a Ruias venture, opens in Phoenix cial annex, after Ruias premise of opening nter for workers. Workers protest, are joined d given press attention. Business owner

    ng singled out unfairly. RMSS offi cial points workers are being paid. PHOENIX MILLS, TION.

    At Hindoostan Mills in Mahalaxmi, Thackerseys sold land for development of 39-storey Kalpataru Heights luxury high-rise, built between 1997 and 1999. This and other towers, and the new entertainment emphasis, are back-drop for gushing new report on Parels prospects. HIN-DOOSTAN MILLS, GENTRIFICATION.

    Reliance becomes citys largest housing owner with pur-chase of development rights at three mills. 3 lakh sq ft of housing will be built on Shaktis 2 ha property adjoin-ing Mahalaxmi railway station. Svadeshi, owned by the Tatas and located in Kurla, is to be partially redeveloped, supposedly as part of a rehabilitation package. Victo-ria Mills, part of the so-called Golden Triangle in Parel, would be jointly developed with the Govanis. SHAKTIMILLS, SWADESHI MILLS, VICTORIA MILLS, MUMBAI REAL ESTATE.

    Mumbai BMC plans to relax its industrial location con-trols, and boost permitted FSI at the same time. INDUS-TRIAL LOCATION POLICY.

    Balanced article in Business India reasons that succes-sive governments of both leading parties have pleaded helplessness in confronting illegalities, and have tried to milk the lucrative development potential while ostensibly protecting the interests of workers. Interviewed mill own-ers affi rm they have no intention to run mills in Mumbai, a

    .segatnavdasrotcesmoolrewopehtybenodnussenisubGKSS points to the few mills that remain profi table as evidence to the contrary. All parties want government to

    .scimonocednuosnodesabycilopahtiwdrawrofpetsMILL LAND POLICY, TEXTILE INDUSTRY.

    Maharashtra government under new Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh sanctions the sale of 140 acres of excess land by NTC mills in Mumbai, and is expected to follow with permission for private and state-run mills. The integrated approach of the Correa report is mentioned. A deal for private mills is expected to follow. In anticipation, MOA says it has been trying valiantly to revive mills (see confl icting statement above!), and RMMS says govern-ment should ensure that all viable mills remain in opera-tion. RMMS also proposes creation of tripartite commit-tee to monitor use of sale proceeds. There is doubt that the expected drop in land prices will materialize. MILL LAND POLICY, NTC MILLS.

    Editorial affi rms Maharash-tra government decision to allow NTC land sale, and ar-gues that land use formula of DC rules should be adhered to, but that proceeds should not be required to be used for on-site mill moderniza-tion. Rather, workers should be taken care of and industry should be supported where it can succeed. MILL LAND POLICY, NTC MILLS.

    Articles examine the integrated approaches to mill land development recommended by the recent Maharashtra subcommittee report, and alternatives by Neera and Arvind Adarkar. The latter recommends that a 600-acre area be planned as a whole, and that millowners one-third share should include both retained industrial uses and new commercial ones. Further, millworkers should get jobs and housing in the area. MILL LAND POLICY.

    National government set to legalize contract labor, which article argues is already the lifeblood of Indian economy. Change anticipated to give contract workers a voice, (while undermining the power of labor unions.) NATION-AL INDUSTRIAL POLICY.

    Landmarc Citi, a 4 lakh square foot leisure complex on the Sriram Mills site, quietly opens its fi rst phase, with go-karts. SRIRAM MILLS.

    Indian Property Research report fi nds that land prices have fallen in Mumbai, and the city remains desirable for international business. Parel is the new favored offi ce location, for its funky and fl exible spaces, lower prices and location. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS.

    Maharashtra Chief Minister Deshmukh announces new textile policy for private mills, a revision of the DC rules. Now, mill owners would be able to sell 30% (rather than

    .tnempolevederronoitazinredomrofdnalriehtfo)%51Resulting new commercial development would be re-quired to employ retrenched mill workers, and displaced chawl dwellers would have to be provided replacement housing units. A tribunal would be set up to oversee mill modernization and relocation plans, and use of proceeds to fi rst pay workers. MILL LAND POLICY.

    Frontline article assesses the cultural and political his-tory of the mill lands question, and suggests that the new policy is as good an offer as mill workers have seen in decades, but that its promise could be tragically hollow if history is a guide. MILL LAND POLICY, TEXTILE IN-DUSTRY, GIRANGAUN CULTURE.

    States Town Planning department holds public review of new textile land policy, and is moving forward in expedited fashion. Relief and anticipation, but caution that property prices wont immediately fall, that Mumbais textile indus-try cant be cured by modernization alone, and that if the

    .noitatnemelpmituobayrrowdluohsew,ediugasitsapMILL LAND POLICY.

    Swadeshi Mills proposes selling 48 acres from its old complex in Kurla, for development of hi-tech space. The state is the putative buyer, and proceeds would go to

    .stbeddnasrekrowyapot,tnuoccaderetsinimda-truocSWADESHI MILLS.

    Colin Cunningham, architectural historian, proposes comparative study of British and Indian textile mills, and offers idea of converting engine houses to community halls. MILL LAND POLICY, CONSERVATION.

    New policy for private mills still pending; speculation that it is being delayed until after upcoming election, and/or to prevent a rapid fall in land prices. Mafatlal Mills workers agonize, with no pay since September when the mill closed despite recent modernization. They are grim about their chances in the new economy. MILL LAND POLICY, MA-FATLAL MILLS.

    Report on Reliances investment in redevelopment projects at Victoria Mills, Standard Mills, and Sadhana Mills. Redevelopment of Standard Mills, in Prabhadevi, was stalled in 1998 when the builder was killed, but now completion of the three Chaitanya Towers is expected in four months. Sadhana Mills redevelopment has stalled; the builder has run out of money. VICTORIA MILLS, STANDARD MILLS, SADHANA MILLS, MUMBAI REAL ESTATE.

    In Art India, Darryl DMonte briefl y relates Mill Lands chronicle, the stop-go policy that predominated until re-cent revision of DC rules, and the alternative policies rec-ommended by the Correa committee and by the Adarkars and Das. He emphasizes the conservation potential of mill structures. MILL LAND POLICY, CONSERVATION.

    Phoenix Mall, a 3 lakh sq ft retail and entertainment com-plex, opens in the old Phoenix Mill. PHOENIX MILLS.

    Chief Minister Deshmukh calls for govtion of mills that fail to submit revival sctextile policy adopted in 2001. This wouprovisions of the Urban Land Ceiling ancritics see it as easier said than donPOLICY.

    Mill LandsFigure-Ground Plan

    Location Map

    From Roof of ITC Grand Central Hotel, MumbaiPhoto Series

    The great concentration of textile mills in central Mumbai is the subject of a story of deindustrialization, deregula-tion, real estate speculation, labor and environmental activism, and the failure of government to administer rules or provide leadership.

    A 1991 policy established terms for legal redevelopment of mill lands, ensuring that two-thirds of the land be reserved for public housing and open space. In 1996, architect Charles Correa recommended that these public amenities be planned as a whole, and sought to show how this could have profound public benefits.

    The one thirds policy was continually evaded, and the recommendation for coordinated planning was never followed. As an independent study at the University of Michigan, I created a detailed timeline tracing the course of this missed opportunity.

    Timeline (detail)Mumbai December 2005Mumbai Mill Lands

    Mu

    mb

    ai

    STU

    DIE

    S

  • AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY

    2000 2001 2002

    ena-BJP did not protect GKSS and RMSS call for

    d sale proceeds. MOA rules, to put it in a level agree that regulation of ability of textile industry MILL LAND POLICY.

    lls managements rehabilitation uld be reopened, 1500 workers eme is resisted by GKSS, which already promised and failed to ILLS.

    pany, a Ruias venture, opens in Phoenix cial annex, after Ruias premise of opening nter for workers. Workers protest, are joined d given press attention. Business owner

    ng singled out unfairly. RMSS offi cial points workers are being paid. PHOENIX MILLS, TION.

    At Hindoostan Mills in Mahalaxmi, Thackerseys sold land for development of 39-storey Kalpataru Heights luxury high-rise, built between 1997 and 1999. This and other towers, and the new entertainment emphasis, are back-drop for gushing new report on Parels prospects. HIN-DOOSTAN MILLS, GENTRIFICATION.

    Reliance becomes citys largest housing owner with pur-chase of development rights at three mills. 3 lakh sq ft of housing will be built on Shaktis 2 ha property adjoin-ing Mahalaxmi railway station. Svadeshi, owned by the Tatas and located in Kurla, is to be partially redeveloped, supposedly as part of a rehabilitation package. Victo-ria Mills, part of the so-called Golden Triangle in Parel, would be jointly developed with the Govanis. SHAKTIMILLS, SWADESHI MILLS, VICTORIA MILLS, MUMBAI REAL ESTATE.

    Mumbai BMC plans to relax its industrial location con-trols, and boost permitted FSI at the same time. INDUS-TRIAL LOCATION POLICY.

    Balanced article in Business India reasons that succes-sive governments of both leading parties have pleaded helplessness in confronting illegalities, and have tried to milk the lucrative development potential while ostensibly protecting the interests of workers. Interviewed mill own-ers affi rm they have no intention to run mills in Mumbai, a

    .segatnavdasrotcesmoolrewopehtybenodnussenisubGKSS points to the few mills that remain profi table as evidence to the contrary. All parties want government to

    .scimonocednuosnodesabycilopahtiwdrawrofpetsMILL LAND POLICY, TEXTILE INDUSTRY.

    Maharashtra government under new Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh sanctions the sale of 140 acres of excess land by NTC mills in Mumbai, and is expected to follow with permission for private and state-run mills. The integrated approach of the Correa report is mentioned. A deal for private mills is expected to follow. In anticipation, MOA says it has been trying valiantly to revive mills (see confl icting statement above!), and RMMS says govern-ment should ensure that all viable mills remain in opera-tion. RMMS also proposes creation of tripartite commit-tee to monitor use of sale proceeds. There is doubt that the expected drop in land prices will materialize. MILL LAND POLICY, NTC MILLS.

    Editorial affi rms Maharash-tra government decision to allow NTC land sale, and ar-gues that land use formula of DC rules should be adhered to, but that proceeds should not be required to be used for on-site mill moderniza-tion. Rather, workers should be taken care of and industry should be supported where it can succeed. MILL LAND POLICY, NTC MILLS.

    Articles examine the integrated approaches to mill land development recommended by the recent Maharashtra subcommittee report, and alternatives by Neera and Arvind Adarkar. The latter recommends that a 600-acre area be planned as a whole, and that millowners one-third share should include both retained industrial uses and new commercial ones. Further, millworkers should get jobs and housing in the area. MILL LAND POLICY.

    National government set to legalize contract labor, which article argues is already the lifeblood of Indian economy. Change anticipated to give contract workers a voice, (while undermining the power of labor unions.) NATION-AL INDUSTRIAL POLICY.

    Landmarc Citi, a 4 lakh square foot leisure complex on the Sriram Mills site, quietly opens its fi rst phase, with go-karts. SRIRAM MILLS.

    Indian Property Research report fi nds that land prices have fallen in Mumbai, and the city remains desirable for international business. Parel is the new favored offi ce location, for its funky and fl exible spaces, lower prices and location. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS.

    Maharashtra Chief Minister Deshmukh announces new textile policy for private mills, a revision of the DC rules. Now, mill owners would be able to sell 30% (rather than

    .tnempolevederronoitazinredomrofdnalriehtfo)%51Resulting new commercial development would be re-quired to employ retrenched mill workers, and displaced chawl dwellers would have to be provided replacement housing units. A tribunal would be set up to oversee mill modernization and relocation plans, and use of proceeds to fi rst pay workers. MILL LAND POLICY.

    Frontline article assesses the cultural and political his-tory of the mill lands question, and suggests that the new policy is as good an offer as mill workers have seen in decades, but that its promise could be tragically hollow if history is a guide. MILL LAND POLICY, TEXTILE IN-DUSTRY, GIRANGAUN CULTURE.

    States Town Planning department holds public review of new textile land policy, and is moving forward in expedited fashion. Relief and anticipation, but caution that property prices wont immediately fall, that Mumbais textile indus-try cant be cured by modernization alone, and that if the

    .noitatnemelpmituobayrrowdluohsew,ediugasitsapMILL LAND POLICY.

    Swadeshi Mills proposes selling 48 acres from its old complex in Kurla, for development of hi-tech space. The state is the putative buyer, and proceeds would go to

    .stbeddnasrekrowyapot,tnuoccaderetsinimda-truocSWADESHI MILLS.

    Colin Cunningham, architectural historian, proposes comparative study of British and Indian textile mills, and offers idea of converting engine houses to community halls. MILL LAND POLICY, CONSERVATION.

    New policy for private mills still pending; speculation that it is being delayed until after upcoming election, and/or to prevent a rapid fall in land prices. Mafatlal Mills workers agonize, with no pay since September when the mill closed despite recent modernization. They are grim about their chances in the new economy. MILL LAND POLICY, MA-FATLAL MILLS.

    Report on Reliances investment in redevelopment projects at Victoria Mills, Standard Mills, and Sadhana Mills. Redevelopment of Standard Mills, in Prabhadevi, was stalled in 1998 when the builder was killed, but now completion of the three Chaitanya Towers is expected in four months. Sadhana Mills redevelopment has stalled; the builder has run out of money. VICTORIA MILLS, STANDARD MILLS, SADHANA MILLS, MUMBAI REAL ESTATE.

    In Art India, Darryl DMonte briefl y relates Mill Lands chronicle, the stop-go policy that predominated until re-cent revision of DC rules, and the alternative policies rec-ommended by the Correa committee and by the Adarkars and Das. He emphasizes the conservation potential of mill structures. MILL LAND POLICY, CONSERVATION.

    Phoenix Mall, a 3 lakh sq ft retail and entertainment com-plex, opens in the old Phoenix Mill. PHOENIX MILLS.

    Chief Minister Deshmukh calls for govtion of mills that fail to submit revival sctextile policy adopted in 2001. This wouprovisions of the Urban Land Ceiling ancritics see it as easier said than donPOLICY.

    Mu

    mb

    ai

    STU

    DIES

  • Merritt Parkway (CT 15), Greenwich I-95 frontage street, Stamford CT 8, Bridgeport Merritt Parkway spur, Orange

    I-95, Milford

    I-91, Hartford

    The Interstate Highway SystemIn 2006 the U.S. interstate highway system reached its fiftieth anniver-sary. As a graduate student, I undertook an independent study of limited-access highways: how they have been viewed by urban theo-rists, the forms they have taken, and the ways in which they have struc-tured our development patterns and our experience of place.

    Highway engineers led in the creation of the 41,000-mile system, but modern planning concepts of blight removal and downtown revitalization had a major influence on the location of design of urban freeways. Behind the logic of efficient and safe traffic movement, freeways have been part of an intentional restructuring of urban space.

    Reflections on FreewaysPlanning thinkers of the Progressive era imagined a synergy between parkways--a new type of roadway introduced around New York City--and a dispersed settlement pattern.

    The real effects of freeways on the urban fabric provided an early challenge for the emerging area of urban design, in the context of freeway revolts in the late 1960s and 1970s. Recent years have seen invigorated thinking about the interac-tions between transportation networks and land use patterns, including the role of freeways.

    The environmental and cultural impacts of freeways have been widely commented on. Lewis Mum-ford was early to celebrate the potential for limited-access highways in the landscape, but by 1962 lamented the thinly spread conglom-eration of homes, shopping centers, and factory sites adrift in a vast sea of car parks...[and] the constantly multiplying expressways and clover-leafs and space-eating traffic inter-changes. Some have seen in those interchanges a process of cultural standardization and loss. Others view freeway environments as prototypical shapes or even monuments in the contemporary world.

    Rethinking FreewaysI have continued to develop an argument about how the American freeway system can be changed, to better address and connect with cities, towns and landscapes. The principles I propose include the integrity of urban and rural environ-ments; complexity and diversity in the transportation system; and a new focus on the possibilities of land reclaimed from the freeway system.

    Southern New EnglandI focus my observations on the freeways of southern New England. This region has been a laboratory for new forms of highways, and thinking about highways, from Patrick Geddes vision for the townless highway to Kevin Lynchs ideas for designing highways to produce legibility at the scale of the modern urban region; and from the early parkways to the Big Dig. As a region with many small and compact old cities, it is rife with the conflicts between urbanism and highways.

    Photo SeriesIn the fall of 2005 I spent four days driving the freeways of southern New England, documenting the formats and the patterns, and keeping my eyes and mind open.

    Rethinking FreewaysDecember 2005/Ongoing New England

    New

    En

    gla

    nd

    STU

    DIE

    S